physical phenomena have
differing causes--the issue is in what's apparent and what really is the cause.
I tend to agree with Axil. His comment that if you look deep enough (the
picture will make sense) is the basis for scientific investigation.
Bob Cook (Stalecookie) (My first respon
Harry--
A photon--light is thought to be an electric field and an orthogonal magnetic
field which oscillate with an amplitude and frequency characteristic of the
energy of the photon, and propagate through space empty space at the speed of
light c. There is no charge that creates the magnetic
Dave--
I suspect that most of the theory is Yeong Kim's and the experimental
description is from John Hadjichristos of DGT.
Kim had proposed the BEC idea some time ago.
I find Kim's theory quite reasonable. The ability to predict the rate of
reactions is significant and the importance o
Dave--
One other idea is that the early failure of many of the P-F effect experiments
did not pay attention to the magnetic field present in P-F's original
experiment. Hagelstein's current lectures at MIT point this out indirectly by
displaying the arrangement of the electrodes in the cells-
Alan--
I watched the Hagelstein 5th day lecture last night. With respect to the
NiH system some of his optic and sonic coupling arguments went over my head.
I did understand the electron shielding argument associated with overcoming
the coulomb repulsion issue in the Ni matrix. Its not appar
He-3.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: H Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
I would be surprised that Focardi did not monitor He-3
stimulate a quantum system with fixed input frequencies, various
crystals and impurities may not help.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems
-Original Message-----
Harry--
Frenchette--the new reporter of the MIT seminar, stated the following:
"In the case of nickel the hydrogen forms tight clusters. It does not
occupy the voids in the lattice as in palladium. This may explain the higher
temperatures which are observed with the Hot Cat. (my conjecture)
imo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Also I suspect that the nano Ni that is produced is pretty pure. That may
be why Rossi uses it and may be the reason other researchers do
Bob--Bob Cook here
Your comments are revealing. I believe quantum systems that are big enough to
handle the energy fractionation that Hagelstein identifies in his lectures are
a requirement for any solid state nuclear reaction. A thermal conductor to get
the heat out is also necessary
Fran--
I agree fully.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:36 AM
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems
IMHO grain size and geometry of these "other" alloys
he APS establishment.) However, it would not be the first time I was
wrong. A mentor once said "it takes $1,000,000 worth of mistakes to make a
good engineer," and that was in the late 60's. Luckily I do not have to worry
about the issues Hagelstein and others make
Ed--Bob Cook here--
Another question is if D is formed in the Ni-H system as you propose, why not
the generation of He-4 as in the Pd system without the nasty fragmentation or
fission of the Ni?
The key to controlling the Rossi process maybe controlling the formation of D.
The energy
is a waste of time.
Ed Storms
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
Eric--
Your bring up some interesting questions about the Rossi reactor. The
information I have included come from Rossi and Focardi's international patent
application noted below.
1. Is
Jed--
Thanks for the observations of Clarke--its is an optimistic observation as are
many regarding LENR. The pessimistic ones don't seem to be coming up as often.
Bob --an old optimist
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, Februar
Ed--Bob Cook here
Thanks for you response. I need a little more time to think about your ideas.
I need to look at the respective products you identify and the likely other
respective fission pieces to see if I agree with what you say makes sense.
Just roughly thinking, I would expect a
Ed--Bob Cook here
Spin states of a quantum system reflect the angular momentum of the system and
hence the energy associated with that angular momentum. High spin quantum
numbers reflect the higher energy of the system. The allowable states are
quantized. In magnetic fields the direction of
Jones-- Bob Cook here--
I doubt there was no connection. I would guess the work at SPAWAR became a
black project. LENR clearly has potential for ship propulsion and other
high energy density fuel needs in the Navy.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
Eric--Bob Cook here--
It may be that laser radiation at selected frequencies could activate organic
Ni compounds selectively based on the mass of the Ni isotope. The activation
may be ionization or other molecular changes to increase or decrease solubility
and the opportunity for separation
: [Vo]:MIT Course Day 5 -- NiH Systems
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
I think you have the decay scheme for Ni-59 wrong. It has a 76,000 year
half life and decays by electron capture as you said.
It's good that you seem to know your way around these nuclear transi
Eric--Bob here
I looked at the link and have now seen a list of cross sections for the Ni-59,
P reaction. I must study the protocol for measuring the specified cross
sections to understand the sig and dsig data. Off hand I do not understand
these labels. My guess is that the energies listed
you suggest for the splitting of Pd and Ni. A couple references
would be good.
When do you expect to finish your book on the subject? If you have a partial
bibliography of references, maybe that would give me the pertinent leads.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Edmund
Jones--
Why do you say the patent appears to be photoelectric?
It seems to identify another way of loading a Pd or other metal with D or H
or both at the surface of the metal and inducing solid state fusion of the
loaded materials--probably D based on what the inventers say.
Bob
- Ori
Eric---Bob here--
I agree with your assessment. However, it does imply fusion of D and in fact
uses the term "fusion". The following is a copy (translated from German with
some mistakes) of the paragraph 12 of the patent :
"Particularly preferably, the cathode material has been found to p
Jones--Bob Cook here--
I saw that mention also and planned to follow up to address some of Ed concerns
about it not being possible.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:MIT Course
Eric--
I agree with your observation about Jones and Ed. In their give and take just
before this message I was not sure who was saying what. The > symbol seemed to
have no significance as to who was talking.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vorte
Eric, Jones and Ed--Bob Cook here--
Note that Pam Mosier Boss and Larry (the radiation count specialist consultant
for SPAWAR) talked about the CR-39 scheme for monitoring radiation from the
Pd-D system they worked with. (This was 2009 at the U of Mo.) They saw
evidence of tritium, neutrons
Foks0904, Brian and Jones--Bob Cook here--
Thanks for the reference to spin coupling.
If electrons love to pair up in atoms because of spin coupling, why not
protons in a metal lattice quantum system? Kim seems to think that D's with
integral spin can get together at significant tempera
Bob Higgins--Bob Cook here--
I agree with your logic regarding 100% efficient fractionating as possible. As
I noted in an earlier comment Mosier-Boss etal at SPAWAR saw two separate
reactions, the one LENR with no radiation being D-D going to He-4. It was also
the dominant reaction that
A better scheme to extract energy from the Coriolis force is the spinning earth
creates is to erect a windmill or your sailboat in the trade winds which are
caused by this effect.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Blaze Spinnaker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, February
Dave--Bob Cook here
Pd has one of the highest magnetic susceptibility of any metal. The electrons
line up in an applied field to establish a very large B field in the Pd matrix.
The susceptibility determines the relative intensity of the internal and
external magnetic fields. I am not sure
Jones--Bob Cook here--
Your message rings true to me. Here are some additional comments and
thoughts/conjectures.
I first did NMR experiments in my senior year, 1961, at Ed's alma mater,
and we were ever increasing the magnetic field to get better signals and
absorption of RF input
Jones--Bob Cook here--
Good work..
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spin this ...
To backtrack from a post 3 months ago. The Rabi frequencies.
We did not know what to make of it, back then, e
Blaze--
I would not touch big oil with a 10 foot pole.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Blaze Spinnaker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%
Also, anyone notice that XOM
Lou--
Bob Cook here-
Do you know if the Bose thermal bath that the second referenced report talks
about is the same thing as a Bose -Einstein Condensate (BEC)?
Bob
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spin this ...
Perhaps
Nigel and Hoyt--Bob here--
I would say the trade winds are a good example of the extraction of energy from
the rotation of the Earth. Heat certainly is generated and Man has used these
winds to cross the oceans for years.
Nigel, what is the external body in the case of trade winds that is pre
Blaze--Bob here--
I would not touch coal with a 20 foot pole.
What about natural gas--does it have any future?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Blaze Spinnaker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi b
Jones--Bob Cook here--
I am not real up on what happens at the Curie point. Axil had some comments
on that issue.
It will take a little time to digest what you say below. However, I agree
with your last sentence. The complexity includes the coupling with spin of
all the particles in the
Jones--Bob Cook here--
I know the Zeeman effect and studied it way back when. The Stark effect I
am not familiar with, however it sounds like it splits an energy state of
the quantum system to introduce different resonance frequencies as
influenced by the local electric field. It may also
Axil and Ed--Bob here--
Note that I assumed that electrons also were around when the 4 H reaction took
place. The electrons react with the assembled system of particles to make
neutrons as required to conserve spin in the reaction and to get to a low
energy ground state consistent with an inc
Blaze--Bob here--
If you follow Rossi's blog, he has already considered the potential of Sterling
engines. I agree with Bob Higgins that small is not bad. I could use one in
my off-grid home in Alaska. Even a small thermo-electric device hooked to the
NANOR would be useful.
Bob
- Orig
Harry and Dave--Bob Cook here--
Keep in mind that the law is that angular momentum must be conserved. However
systems with angular momentum can also have significant energy that can be
changed to heat.
Take two planets in the solar system with direction of rotation in opposite
directions
Jed etal--Bob Cook here--
I was impressed with Swartz's presentation on the 5th day of the MIT lectures
series. He seems like a real enthusiastic researcher and inventor with a very
significant invention, although small, based on a LENR process, whatever it
turns out to be, The fact th
always true. He also states that angular energy can be converted into other
forms or energy including heat. Can you demonstrate a closed system where
this is not the case?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Feb 10, 2014 10:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo
Jones--Bob Cook Here--
Can you show how the p-e-p reaction as you understand it conserves spin?
I would think that the newly fused particle, whatever it is, would have 1/2
or 3/2 spin--I do not know.
If a positron is emitted, its spin would be -1/2 I think. That would make
the new
ocess.
Ed Storms
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 12, 2014, at 3:00 PM, "Bob Cook" wrote:
Jones--Bob Cook Here--
Can you show how the p-e-p reaction as you understand it conserves spin?
I would think that the newly fused particle, whatever it is, would have
1/2 or 3/2 spin--I do not know.
Axil—Bob Cook here--
I would note that the discussion in Wikipedia applies to a hydrogen molecular
QM system. The individual protons retain their 1/2 spin. When a Hydrogen
enters a matrix it may remain as a molecule or it may enter as an ion. If
there is an ionization process available, it
Axil—Bob Cook here-
That sounds possible from the spin part.
How does the double proton form? I think the electrons and the two protons
may all react in the QM Ni system at the same time (< 10 x e-18 sec.)
Bob
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:54 AM
To: vorte
Axil—Bob Cook Here—
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I say in LENR that the double proton(spin 0) fusion happens then after this
fusion occurs an electron (spin -1/2) capture comes next (reverse beta decay)
the spin of 1/2 is removed by an electron neutrino.
Axil I
Ed --Bob Here-
I have assumed spin--angular momentum--is conserved. Are you saying forget
about that conventional thinking--that angular momentum is not
conserved in the lenr new nuclear process?
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:52 AM
To
Dave—Bob Cook Here--
The electron neutrino may have high energy and 1/2 spin for sure.
I think high energy electron neutrinos have be seen coming from the Sun.
Bob
From: David Roberson
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:20 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: a note from Dr
Jones--
You sound like you must be Dan Brown in real life.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 10:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect
Dyslexic correction of previous post: &qu
, February 17, 2014 7:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Jones-- You sound like you must be Dan Brown in real life.
Well, Bob - if I was getting royalties from Di Vinci code, they would go to
Beene
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 7:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Jones-- You sound like you must be Dan Brown in real life.
Well, Bob - if I was getting royalties from Di Vinci
Axil—Is this just the uncertainty principle in action?
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 10:38 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Slow quantum packets can tunnel thru high Coulomb barrier
More...
The spin produced by slow light will also be squeezed. When the position
Axil-
The squeezing of a H molecule or a proton inside a Ni body-centered cubic cell
may change the angular momentum of the trapped entity and facilitate spin
coupling with one or more different Ni nuclei, and transmutation to a lower
energy, if such a state is available with the particles
It is still remote.
_
Arnaud,
First, off - I am not an expert in NMR and that is why I have been
quizzing Bob Cook about a subject that came up as far back as 1990 - in an
effort to explain the excess energy of LENR - and the lack of detectability
of
the necessary energy to make a
nuclear transition probable.
Bob Cook
-Original Message-
From: Arnaud Kodeck
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:56 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect
Ni61 is the only odd isotope of Ni and
Jones--
The K could be a supplier of heavy eletrons per the W-L theory. I have no
idea how its radioactive decay could influence a LENR, unless it were by the
spectrum of lattice vibrations caused by the K-40 decay. Is the energy
sufficient? The K-40 gamma may be degraded by the lose
Alan--
Any good theory added freely to general understanding of LENR should make
National news.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dr. Stoyan Sarg steps up
From: "Blaze Spinnaker"
Sent: Mo
Jones and Axil--
Axil--Your link to Frydman is a great find—Note his bio below in the item you
identified. His connections to the U of Mo and U of Ill is more than
coincidence.
Paired protons may be what enters the Ni matrix.
A varying external magnetic field which creates a 0 B field in t
folks that worked with the Knight field may know the
answers, having already done the experiment.
Bob
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Knight Field
From: Bob Cook
Paired protons may be what enters the Ni matrix
Jones-Axil, Ed, etal
Check out the current (Feburary) issue of Scientific American--page
32--regarding the radius of the proton. Seems the wave functions overlap
better than one might have concluded from old theory.
The researchers have interesting connections to active long-term LENR theory
Axil--
How do you get wind of all these good items?
Bob
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
A 10^16 magnetic field will deconfine the quarks in t
Jones--nice work--
This is not to much different from my original guess as to the reaction of
d-d in Pd matrix. Only I guessed the resulting He nucleus was excited in a
high spin state and fractioned the energy by spin coupling to the other
particles in the system.
I did not know about quan
John--
What does SR stand for or mean?
Bob
From: John Berry
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 3:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Homopolar generators and the truth of magnetism
Here we go again...
I have strongly argued that according to SR, magnetic fields occur due to
relative
Jones--Bob here.
Due to two emergent memes coming together at the same time, one wonders if
Andrea Rossi was paid in Bitcoins :-)
I do not think so.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:20 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Is there an echo in here?
Jones--Bob here.
Due to two emergent memes coming together at the same time, one wonders if
Andrea Rossi was paid in Bitcoins :-)
I do not think so.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:20 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Is there an echo in here?
Jones--you wrote:
>The only way the USA could have achieved the same reliable nuclear program as
>France did is essentially with Socialism, and a national policy for nuclear.
>Having coal made that policy impossible here – so we did not do that, and now
>the cost of nuclear is through the roof.
Jones--
I make the same mistake frequently.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Is there an echo in here?
-Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook
Jones--Bob here.
Due to two emergent me
the environment and safety
of the people.
I agree with your assessment completely.
Bob Cook
From: Alain Sepeda
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Vortex List
Subject: Re: [Vo]:BrightSource
The socialism (some explain that Gaulism is right-winged socialism, a kind of
paternalist
Jed--
What about gold?
Bob
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is there an echo in here?
H Veeder wrote:
If people stopped valuing flowers, the tulip bulb would cease to have value.
True, but people have valued flowers
Fran and Axil--
Don’t forget the Chiral effect
http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf a quote from
the previous link:
“In strong magnetic field quarks and antiquarks pair more effectively!
S.P. Klevansky and R. H. Lemmer ('89); H. Suganuma and T. Tatsumi ('91) -
eff
sion
of larger virtual particles is the underlying cause for all catalytic action..
I guess my primary objection to Axils point is that he understated the
importance of the geometry and the interaction to the magnetic field.
Fran
From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wedn
Fran--
I am not sure I understand what Axil thinks was his blunder.
Maybe he will explain further.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:My personal brilliant blunder
VERY INTE
Ed--
You stated--
>If the limitations imposed by chemistry are applied to what is actually
>observed, the explanation becomes much clearer.
What limitations do you have in mind?
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund
Fran--
On further reflection and careful reading, I do not think Axil considers he has
blundered--only Mario.
Mario's blog does not say boo about LENR as far as I can tell.
He is interesting, nevertheless. Here is one of his statements:
"Some fallacies are very seductive, and avoiding them
cathodes' atomic structure) where nuclear effects can then
manifest.
Regards,
John
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ed--
You stated--
>If the limitations imposed by chemistry are applied to what is actually
observed, the explanation bec
Ed--
I agree with Axil. I just wrote some other comments regarding this item. They
basically say the same thing about HUP and PEP.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The elephant in the room,
ground
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTaiIkQTmEc
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ed--
You said--
>Trying to fit QM to the lattice is a waste of time.
I would note that the latt
NR.
Ed Storms
Some background
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTaiIkQTmEc
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ed--
You said--
>Trying to fit QM to the lattice is a waste of time.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Ed--
You said--
>Trying to fit QM to the lattice is a waste of time.
I would note that the lattice is a QM system and, although complicated, obeys
the various laws of QM inclu
exclusion principle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
Axil--
Can the electrons pair up to form a Bose particle to avoid the PEP considering
they are free electrons and not in a QM system where PEP acts? I am thinking
of a plasma like
Axil--
How would you measure such a magnetic field inside a NCE? It must be deduced
by other than direct measurement I would guess. However, if possible, it would
be conclusive as to your soliton/crack idea.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Frida
Axil--
Check this out---
http://phys.org/news/2014-02-hidden-electrons.html
It sounds like pressure may make the electrons react with lattice of a metal
oxide in an unusual way yet to be explained--
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, Februa
Axil--
Your next avocation or vocation should be science fiction writing or at least
advising...also consider consulting for Hollywood.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Continuous spin particles
Jones Bob here--
You indicated the following:
>>Chris did not mention SPP implying that he probably does not know of
the plasmon polariton mechanism. It's too late now even though applications
can be altered and augmented (but one loses priority).
Has anyone you know mentioned SPP in a p
Fran and Jones--
Maybe they make a thin substrate ( that H diffuses through, gouge out a line
with a laser beam or electron beam, lay in the nanotubes and then make
layers of the nanotube filled substrate film, sandwich these between good
heat conductors with high magnetic susceptibility and f
Jones--
Thanks.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Dirty Dozen Basic routes to thermal gain for hydrogen
in a lattice
-Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook
Jones Bob here--
You ind
graphene under low temperature and ambient pressure.
Scientific reports 3(1148) FREE). Also they form Dirac cones which I gather,
although I know nothing about them myself, are interesting.
cheers, ken
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
Fran and Jones--
Maybe they mak
Terry--
Sounds like a good idea for the thief--steal the bitcoins, destroy them and
increase the worth of the ones you have in another exchange. The ones that
remain may be worth a lot more, or maybe nothing. It will be interesting to
see what happens to bitcoin mining activity.
Bob
-
magnetic field represented in the coupling expression.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Dirty Dozen Basic routes to thermal gain for hydrogen
in a lattice
-Original Message-
From
"Jones Beene"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 9:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Dirty Dozen Basic routes to thermal gain for hydrogen
in a lattice
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Jones Bob here--
You indicated the following:
>> Chris did not mention SPP implying
Dirty Dozen Basic routes to thermal gain for hydrogen
in a lattice
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Jones Bob here--
You indicated the following:
>> Chris did not mention SPP implying that he probably does not know of
the plasmon polariton mechanism. It's too late now even th
Jones--
We may have to wait for Ed's book.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:"Christopher H. Cooper"
From: Edmund Storms
Nice thought Kevin. Chris and I collaborated to
Ed--
Regarding your comment copied from below--"No amount of discussion about
magnetic fields, hidden electrons, particle spin, etc is useful unless it can
show exactly what needs to be done to cause the reaction to occur in the first
place. " --I agree. However, you seem to always take on a
bly
due to Brown's influence.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
Jones--
Refeerences used in Brown's 2007 paper are as follows:
>>
[1] G. Kurizki, A. Kofman, V.Yudson, Phys. Rev. A53 R35-R38 (1996).
[2] J.Brown, arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608292
[3] H.Krimmel, L. Schimmele
Jed--
Who makes the 1% or more mark up on foreign currency exchanges anyway? Why is
it not an exchange based on the current international rate with no markup for
the common trader? It seems there may be a monopoly in that currency exchange
business.
Bob Cook
- Original Message
, V.Yudson, Phys. Rev. A 53 R35-R38 (1996).
[3] Y. Todate, S.Ikeda, Y.Nakai, A. Agui, Y.Tominaga, J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 5
7761–7770 (1993).<<
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Edmund Storms
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Sent: Saturday, March 01
James and others--
The rumor has it that Industrial Heat, Rossi's underwriter, is negotiating with
a Chinese Co to produce his reactors. It may or may not be true.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Lennart Thornros
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2
1 - 100 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
