In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2015 18:26:17 -0600:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
The search term I used was charged particle spectrometer. One entry that looks
promising is http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029554X7290434X
The journal itself would likely also contain more
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:44:20 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I cannot answer all of these questions. It would be great if we had a
direct line to Dr. Piantelli to ask him - perhaps we could work that out in
the future. But, he is a critical resource to his funding company,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
So now he is in the position of having to invent, design, construct, and
validate such a sensor before he can quantify these particles. His lab is
not equipped to make such a sensor - its development probably requires
...relativistic hydrogen. Shaken not stirred... I mean warped not welled.
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat,
co-author Andrea Rossi
-Original
I cannot answer all of these questions. It would be great if we had a
direct line to Dr. Piantelli to ask him - perhaps we could work that out in
the future. But, he is a critical resource to his funding company,
Nichenergy, and his health is failing. Keep in mind that Piantelli has
been
Thanks Robin. Can you give me the leads you found and/or the search terms
you used so I can be sure to find the ones you saw? I will follow up with
additional searching. If I can find some that appear to fit with
Piantelli's experiment, I will forward them to him and offer to make
contact with
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
This suggests that something nuclear is happening in the branch of the
reaction that results in the ejection of the 6 MeV proton to supply the
proton with its 6 MeV of energy.
The impression I've taken away from what
I wrote:
it might be good to work backwards from known and plausible reactions;
e.g., a proton being stripped off of a deuterium nucleus and hopping over
to the lattice site.
Sorry, that should have been a neutron being stripped off of a deuterium
nucleus, which would lead to the proton that
I believe as follows:
The magnetic fields produced by SPP solitons catalyze nuclear reactions in
matter that this field falls upon. The soliton is PUMPED by heat photons.
The soliton produces two kinds of magnetic photons: real and virtual. The
power of the anapole magnetic field is
-Original Message-
The argument can be made that there was NEVER enough lithium present in
the Lugano reactor to provide the reported net energy gain (1.5 MW-hrs) over
32 hours- even if 100% of the lithium was consumed and converted into
helium.
For the record - The total Lugano Fuel
The amount of nickel Ni62 in the fuel load doubled from some unknown
combination of lighter elements. This fusion process should have released a
huge amount of nuclear binding energy. It is possible that the only thing
that lithium did was donate its neutron to the Nickel 58 to turn it into
Nickel
This is not what Cook and Rossi are now saying. They are claiming in this
so-called “mainstream physics” paper, that lithium + proton fusion to helium
accounts for the gain.
If neutrons were involved there would be neutron activation, a widely known
phenomenon - not seen at Lugano.
It
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:45:31 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Well, Piantelli may not be saying it is a hydrino because he doesn't look
at it that way. He has black box evidence that the Ni and the H- anion
nuclei coalesce producing a specific set of branched outcomes, one of
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
He calls them Hydrinohydride. The smallest is for p = 24. I.e. 24 times
smaller than normal H-. For greater values of p (i.e. further shrunken), the
second electron is unbound, according to his formula, so there is no
Hydrinohydride for larger
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:04:29 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
I cannot pretend to be a spokesman for Dr. Piantelli's theory. I have a
couple of observations from this theory that I still cannot internally
justify (from my own limited understanding of nuclear physics). The
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:48:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
which is why even small pitchblende samples make the Geiger
counter go wild.
Try putting a sheet of paper between the Geiger counter and the pitchblende. I
think you will find that it makes a huge difference. Most
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:53:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
If neutrons were involved there would be neutron activation, a widely known
phenomenon - not seen at Lugano.
[snip]
Indeed, the reaction:
Al27 + Li7 = Al28 + Li6 + 0.475 MeV would produce radioactive Al28 with a
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:54:53 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
He calls them Hydrinohydride. The smallest is for p = 24. I.e. 24 times
smaller than normal H-. For greater values of p (i.e. further shrunken), the
second
Some pitchblende contains radium how emits gammas.
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:31:35 +1000, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:48:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
which is why even small pitchblende samples make the Geiger
counter go wild.
Try putting a
A sheet of paper makes no difference whatsoever. A sheet of aluminum foil
doesn't make much difference but a nickel coin blocks most of this small
sample. The Gamma Scout is picking up x-rays which are not stopped by paper
(even though alpha particles themselves would be). However, to be fair - a
In follow-up hypothetical analysis of the Lugano measurements, consider
this. Look at what it means for the ICP-MS assay of the fuel to have 94.1%
7Li and 5.9% 6Li. With 100mg of LiAlH4 fuel source, the fuel source had
17.2mg of 7Li and 1.08mg of 6Li. If one *presumes* that 6Li is not being
Hi Bob, I have a different interpretation of what happens. Maybe this will
be useful for you:
The idea is simple. What is the easiest way to make small clusters of
atoms? Use the analogy with water vapor. Heat, say, Ni or Pd. Very small
clusters have its shape determined by the boundary, just
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:12:11 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
The ICP-MS analysis is a full volume analysis and showed both Li isotopes near
equal in percentage in the ash.
Just a thought: If the Li was acting as a nuclear catalyst, shuttling back and
forth between Li6-Li7,
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
In follow-up hypothetical analysis of the Lugano measurements, consider this.
Look at what it means for the ICP-MS assay of the fuel
, 2015 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:57:00 -0700:
Hi,
Eric--
One additional idea.
What we have been considering is the formation of 8Be and its decay into
two alpha particles
maybe is it intepreted from the budget that Elforsk allocated for those
tests...
230k (eur) per year 2013 and 2014 as far as I remember.
more precisely
Budget ECAT 2012 200 kkr, 2013-2015 2000 kkr/year.
I imagine that even if fully given for the team, it goes to their
university/lab?
2015-04-09
:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:09 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
In follow-up hypothetical analysis of the Lugano measurements, consider
this. Look at what it means
: Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:24:18 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The Li nucleus becomes excited, but it cannot simply convert directly to
beryllium without
...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:57:00 -0700:
Hi,
Eric--
One additional idea.
What we have been considering
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:24:18 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The Li nucleus becomes excited, but it cannot simply convert directly to
beryllium without an energetic emission to compensate for the kinetic energy
which caused the fusion.
All p+Li7 reactions that have been
Piantelli's theory says that H- anions are responsible for the Ni-H LENR
reaction. According to his theory, the H- anion, as a composite fermion,
enters the Ni atom much as would a muon. Somehow (and Piantelli doesn't
say how) the large H- anion must become a compact negatively charged object
It would not be fair to criticize the Lugano team for not measuring the gas
in their experiment. Rossi lent them a reactor that was not designed for
sampling the product gas. After the experiment, the seal had to be broken
open (there are various descriptions of how this happened). To have
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:57:00 -0700:
Hi,
Eric--
One additional idea.
What we have been considering is the formation of 8Be and its decay into two
alpha particles with only spin energy involved.
As I have suggested before, two anti-parallel spin He* particles may
From: torulf.gr...@bredband.net
May be of interest.
https://fys.kuleuven.be/iks/ns/files/thesis/raabephdthesis.pdf
-
This is a provocative paper on the He-6 halo nucleus. The spin energy of the
halo is found in the 500 keV range. Maybe that is why
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 8 Apr 2015 11:07:16 -0700:
Hi,
Li7 may give up a neutron to become Li6. If Li6 also gives up a neutron, it
would become Li5 which immediately decays into He4 plus a proton.
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that
From: Bob Higgins
Ø To have measured the gas left in the reactor at the end, the whole reactor
would have to be placed in a large ulta-high vacuum system with mechanical
feedthru attachments designed to break the seal on the reactor while inside the
UHV.
No way. Hot tapping machines
they
were all consumed in the subsequent LENR reaction. That seems unlikely to
me.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:09 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat
one.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
I don't get it. 8Be has zero nuclear spin and 4He has zero
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
isospin is a product of the strong force and of the quarks inside the protons
and neutrons. It is fixed no matter how the atoms spins. An atom might
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates
the entire scenario since Li-7 is NOT depleted according to the Lugano
report - but instead is converted to Li-6.
What I drew from the report was the only thing that can
Bob,
Axil is correct in that the Be-8 and He-4 cannot project large spin energy
transfer. It does not help that spin can be anti-parallel when it is based on 0
spin particles to begin with (they would not decay if that was the case) …
however…
There is an interesting isotope of helium,
In the one example in which we have a full accounting of the element
percentage in the fuel and also as transmuted in the ash is the DGT
transmutation assay provided in the ICCF-17 paper. In that assay, there
was a large percentage increase in light elements including lithium,
beryllium, and
as well as energy.)
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, What is your
]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should have
been found, Rossi suddenly reveals that yes, we found it but are just now
taking the opportunity to reveal that we
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should have
been found, Rossi suddenly reveals that yes, we found it but are just now
taking the opportunity to reveal that we found it.
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates the
entire scenario since Li-7 is NOT depleted according to the Lugano report - but
instead is converted to Li-6.
First of all, there is a
May be of interest.
https://fys.kuleuven.be/iks/ns/files/thesis/raabephdthesis.pdf
On
Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:51:24 -0700, Jones Beene wrote:
FROM: Bob
Higgins
Jones, What is your evidence for your statement:
The
Lugano isotope data, even if it could be believed, completely negates
the
. (It
should involve the conservation of angular momentum as well as energy.)
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
FROM: Jones Beene [1]
TO:
vortex-l@eskimo.com [2]
SENT: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:51 AM
SUBJECT: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
Jones, we DO know that there is a large imbalance in the distribution of
7Li in the ash. Look at the difference between the SIMS results which
provide isotopic analysis of the material near the surface, and the results
of ICP-MS which is a bulk analysis of the particle. The surface shows
change
From: Bob Cook
I am not surprised that He has not been reported from the Lugano E-Cat test
heretofore.
Bob – As someone who is dedicated to seeking answers to the most important
problem facing society in the coming decades – how to get off of addiction to
fossil fuel - you should be
Blaze- Disregard previous numbers. I’ll try to calculate the internal pressure
at day 30 another way. The point remains that if lithium fusion is responsible
for the gain, lots of helium needs to have been produced and the reactor
probably could not have tolerated the pressure.
From:
From: Bob Higgins
Jones, we DO know that there is a large imbalance in the distribution of 7Li in
the ash.
I agree with that – as far as it goes.
The problem is that the imbalance is entirely consistent with having mixed pure
Li-6 isotope with LAH containing the natural ratio
Well on second look, at day 32, the internal helium pressure at 1200 C is about
2000 psi if indeed the Lugano excess heat calculation was correct (it wasn’t)
which could arguably have been tolerated by the reactor. About 0.03 moles of
helium would have been produced at 8 MeV per atom to give
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Levi and his team were reportedly paid half a million bucks ...
Do you have a source for this that goes into more detail?
Eric
Jones, it is possible that helium was observed and was originally
discounted as error. That happens.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Surprise, surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should
have been found, Rossi
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Ø Jones, it is possible that helium was observed and was originally discounted
as error. That happens.
Not when this much claimed energy has been seen.
Think about the implications. The Lugano experiment supposedly generated 2 kW
excess for 30+ days. This is
Amazing that some folks have no trouble accepting 16 MeV is the source of
LENR energy but quickly discount that 500 keV of spin energy can impart
linear momentum due to centripetal disruption of weakly bound particles.
-Spin Cartel
I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already
suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit back and make
countless guesses without ever studying or investing in actual experiment … I
think he is feeling the heat on his toes now and casting
Cook's theory is good, indeed, It would be wonderful if Cook's theory was
mainstream. But it isn't, even though he is fighting for it for 4
decades...
physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already
suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit back and make
countless guesses without ever studying or investing in actual experiment … I
think he
Peter--
Thanks for the heads up on the Cook-Rossi paper.
The most important observation IMHO is the caption for Figure 5, specifically,
...two alpha particles (D), which are released with 17 MeV of angular
momentum, but without gamma radiation.
The smoking gun is the huge energy of the
: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already
suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit back and make
countless guesses without ever studying or investing
of sound within the nuclear structure.
Frank Znidarsic
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 6:38 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I would
...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 6:38 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already
suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit
and transfers
its excess energy via spin coupling, one spin quanta or so at a time.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Like so many
Bob Cook,
Could that possibly explain the high magnetic field reported by the
discredited DGT experiments, or was that discredited too?
Like so many LENR theories, the Cook theory of the LENR reaction is not
fundamental. Like almost all other LENR theories, it deals with the
emergent results of the fundamental LENR reaction without explaining the
cause of the observed experimental results.
If a theory cannot explain EVERY aspect
to compute the velocity of sound within the nuclear structure.
Frank Znidarsic
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 6:38 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea
Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
Bob,
There are other silly errors besides the confusion over nitrogen. Any paper,
even a preprint
Jones Beene writes. this paper is cannot be taken seriously. A waste
of time.
I wish you wouldn't just damn the paper out of hand but give some
reasons of just why it is wrong. I don't have the knowledge of nuclear
reactions that some others do here, but most of the theories seem far
from
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Bob,
There are other silly errors besides the confusion over nitrogen. Any paper,
even a preprint, can be understandable and yet meaningless – when
In my understanding about the LENR process, I have borrowed Dr. Kims idea
about the Bosenova as the way that the energy contents of the soliton is
recycled back into the thermal invirnment of the reactor. After the
bosenova explodes, the electrons and the soft x-rays and XUV are decoupled
or
so at a time.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
Like so many LENR theories
to the rest of the particles in the locale
(coherent system), including the electrons.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Figure 5
Jones Beene,
You are deliberately misleading about Rossi getting his degree
on-line. He got his PhD from Milan University. He did take an
on-line course in chemical engineering later, in order to learn about
that. Seems to be a reasonable thing to do.
You make much of the lack of theory
which was not understood at the
time the miracle was noted.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
From: Bob Cook
From: Bob Cook
Note that the paper says the energy is angular momentum not kinetic energy of
the alphas. Angular momentum energy is spin energy. The alphas move away with
essentially no kinetic energy normally associated with non-solid state or
non-coherent systems
Bob,
But
energy via spin coupling, one spin quanta or so at a time.
Bob Cook
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil mailto:janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Here is where Norman Cook and Rossi demonstrate a basic lack of understanding
of nuclear physics.
To be precise – as mentioned before, two alpha particles released from Be
decay are indeed gamma free
The gamma from Be8 is weak, only 46 KeV.
In Italy the title ‘Dr’ does not imply a PhD or medical degree, but only a
basic (undergraduate) degree.
From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net]
Sent: 07 April 2015 22:20
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
:* *Axil Axil* janap...@gmail.com
*To:* *vortex-l* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 8:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
Like so many LENR theories, the Cook theory of the LENR reaction is not
fundamental. Like
of the ideas Cook and Rossi have presented.
Bob Cook (no relation to N. Cook)
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I wanted to show
in the locale (coherent system), including the electrons.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
Charles Francis
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22Charles+Francis%22
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:00:04 -0700
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20150407
In Italy the title ‘Dr’ does not imply a PhD or medical degree, but only a
basic
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36817/SimulationNuclearTransmutationPresentation.pdf?sequence=2
Simulation of the Nuclear Transmutation Effects in LENR ... the
presentation form ICCF-18
Cook states as follows: Interestingly, Ni61 was not strongly depleted–
apparently
Hi Bob,
The possibility you've been drawing attention to, that the result of the
decay of the [8Be]* compound nucleus into two 4He nuclei with little linear
momentum and a great deal of angular momentum makes for an interesting
thought experiment. Out of curiosity, I calculated the energy that
I don't get it. 8Be has zero nuclear spin and 4He has zero nuclear spin.
How can a nuclear reaction involving them have huge annular momentum?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
The possibility you've been drawing attention to, that the result
The isospin in a nuclear reaction is conserved. The quantum law is called
the conservation of isospin.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't get it. 8Be has zero nuclear spin and 4He has zero nuclear spin.
How can a nuclear reaction involving them have
Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
Hi Bob,
The possibility you've been drawing attention to, that the result of the
decay of the [8Be
physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
Rossi
I don't get it. 8Be has zero nuclear spin and 4He has zero nuclear spin. How
can a nuclear reaction involving them have huge annular momentum?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bob
...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:16 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author
Andrea Rossi
I don't get it. 8Be has zero nuclear spin and 4He has zero nuclear spin.
How can a nuclear reaction involving them have
with the decay of the 8Be
nucleus. The two LENR processes would be similar in this regard.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Also I do not know of any reason that He* could not happen with each new
He* spinning in opposite direction with respect to a magnetic field and
slow down incrementally with angular momentum distributed to the coherent
94 matches
Mail list logo
