Hi Jim,
there is a ZODB 3.8.2 release but there is no SVN tag for 3.8.2.
Also the 3.8 branch does not contain the information from the
release notes that are present on PyPI. You missed to commit
your local SVN changes?
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG \ ZOPYX & Friends
Charlottenstr.
And what has this to do with ZODB?
-aj
On 04.09.09 05:54, tsmiller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am POSTing from qooxdoo using the io2.HttpRequest and somewhere in the
> transport my data is getting messed up. My data leaving the client is a
> valid stringified dictionary (data = qx.util.Json.stringify(
On 14.09.09 13:27, Chris Withers wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
>>
>>> Sadly, when you're trying to figure out which folder is using all the
>>> space on a disk that's running out of space, that's not practical...
>>>
>> How about simply writing a script that crawls the ZODB and gi
Am 25.09.09 16:54, schrieb Pedro Ferreira:
> Hello,
> I was trying to migrate a machine from 3.8.1 to 3.9.0, but I'm getting
> the following error:
>
> """
> 2009-09-25T16:34:35 (2606) new connection ('137.138.4.155', 45551):
>
> 2009-09-25T16:34:35 (137.138.4.155:45551) received handshake 'Z309
Hi there,
we are in the situation that we are running Zope 2.11 with heavily
patched ZODB 3.8 with this extension:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zodb/+spec/dm-pack-optimization
While packing a storage we figured out that this extension is
not compatible with the ZODB "versions" feature - mean
Am 30.09.09 15:03, schrieb Chris Withers:
>
> PS: Andreas, I could have taken your usual approach and just shouted
> at you to use Google since Jim already helped me through this about a
> month ago ;-)
The usual approach is: looking at the sources..but this script does not
seem to be part of the
Am 07.11.09 18:25, schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> Hi.
>
> I've been playing around with the new "cache-size-bytes" setting to
> limit the ZODB cache sizes.
>
> My ZODB 3.9.3 (Zope 2.12 / Plone) config had a setting of
> cache-size-bytes to 128mb and a cache-size of one million (to
> effectively disab
ound it pretty
amazing, fast and reliable. Especially the replication support looks good
and the sharding functionality (although still alpha or beta) appears
promising. But the speed has its price: only atomicity for single
document entities.
Andreas
Andreas Jung mailto:i...@zopyx.com&g
The project - at least enterprise-level projects - requires are careful
choice of the tools and backends. The ZODB is the golden bullet for all
and everything. Depending on the data model and the project needs you
have to
look at relational database or NOSQL databases as alternatives.
And as you w
Am 09.12.09 16:54, schrieb Pedro Ferreira:
> We could use an OOBTree instead... but something less
> complex would suffice... any suggestions?
OOBTrees are complex?
-aj
<>___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>>> What is zc.beforestorage?
>> Look at its PyPi page
>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.beforestorage
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
There is also dm.historical when you need to deal with earlier versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> I propose to drop Python 2.4 support in ZODB 3.10, mainly so I can use
> the with statement to clean up the code.
>
> Any objections?
No objections from the Zope 2 side.
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we have some huge ZODB file storage (60-80 GB each) and we want
to split the storage into a number of smaller storage (easier
to handle for backup and packing). The storages themselves only
contain a few (Zope 2) folders - let's say folders
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we had in the past several issues with hour-long outages of our
ZEO servers. The reasons are pretty easy: with have several big
storages (60-80GB) and in case of a cluster failures we were not able
to shutdown the ZEO servers in a clean way.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Andreas Jung
> wrote:
>> we had in the past several issues with hour-long outages of our
>> ZEO servers. The reasons are pretty easy: with have several big
>> storages (6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>>> Another issue is that, as things are now, while an index is being
>>> saved, no transactions can be committed. This is less serious now
>>> that saving indexes is much faster, however, saving a large index
>>> may still take se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I am trying to check a Data.fs as used under Zope 2.10 for Poskey errors.
Running fsrefs gives me the following:
pl...@diaweb06:/data/zeo_buildout$ bin/zopepy
./parts/zope2/utilities/ZODBTools/fsrefs.py labor.fs.kaputt
Traceback (most rece
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sidnei da Silva
> wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> Your error looks quite similar to:
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/zodb-dev@zope.org/msg02207.html
>>
>> Maybe it's the same issue?
>
> Ah, good poin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Andreas Jung
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sidnei da Silva
>>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to the ZODB 3.10 release notes we will have dedicated
processes on the ZEO server side for each client connection. What will
be the major benefits of this change?
Our typical scenario is like this: we run 5-6 ZEO servers where each
server ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> According to the ZODB 3.10 release notes we will have dedicated
>> processes on th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
a customer site is running Plone 3.3 w/ plone.app.blob.
While creating a 'File' instance we get the following error:
2010-04-26T13:17:07 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog 1272277027.360.157502129415
http://www.deisa.eu/test-project/conversions/@@gen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could this be related to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/224169
?
Andreas
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi ther
ons of the target file before actually trying to
write it back.
Andreas
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Could this be related to
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zodb/+bug/224169
>
> ?
>
> Andreas
>
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Andreas Jun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The current backup strategy for backing up a Data.fs with blob storage
seems to be using repozo for the Data.fs and rsync for the blob storage.
Rsyncing the blob storage makes only sense when it would be possible to
restore a particular blob file for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
>
>
> Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 4:46:46 PM, you wrote:
>
> JF> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>>> Hello Jim,
>>>
>>> Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 1:37:19 PM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> JF> On Tue, May 11, 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Gabriel
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are hosting a big ZEO based zope site and encountered a problem with a
>> limited size of file descriptors (FDs) of the ZEO server.
>>
>> Scenario
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Andreas Gabriel
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pedro Ferreira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are receiving occasional error messages such as:
>
> """
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cds_indico-0.97_rc1-py2.4.egg/MaKaC/webinterface/rh/base.py",
>
> lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pedro Ferreira wrote:
>
>> http://www.zopyx.de/blog/checking-your-zodb-storages-for-poskey-errors
>>
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. Unfortunately, it seems like this script only works for 64
> bit oids... which doesn't seem to be the case.
>
huh?
works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Do you know that Zope 2.10 won't work with ZODB 3.9? If so, I'm
>>> curious why?
>> Zope 2.10 includes ZODB 3.7 by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we are currently investigating options for a large-scale solution
where the machines (ZEO clients and ZEO server) should be separated
across two data centers. Incoming traffic should be balanced between
both data centers. Automatic failover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aran Dunkley wrote:
> I'm
> wondering what you guys, the core developers, think of the
> practicalities of Plone in P2P, for example could ZODB use a DHT as its
> storage layer? what kind of querying is required on the DHT?
No idea what "P2P" means to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aran Dunkley wrote:
> I mean P2P as in using a DHT (distributed hash table) for its storage
> layer so that it can run in a network composed only of the client users
> with no web-server, the same way that the file-sharing programs such as
> azzureus a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Villemade wrote:
> Hey Andreas,
>
> I think it makes sense if the storage backend is hosted on-premise (hence
> private cloud), and i think that's what Aran is thinking about.
> They could have Plone->ZODB->Storage backend in the same datacenter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Villemade wrote:
> Hey Andreas,
>
> I don't know much about Aran's project, so you are right to wonder the
> necessity to have yet another storage backend.
> Maybe he has needs and requirements that can't be fulfilled by the current
> backends.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aran Dunkley wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> It's looking like Plone/ZODB would need too much modification and
> testing at the current time to move in to P2P.
Neither Plone nor ZODB require modifications. You need a cloud-aware
storage suitable to be used as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stéphane Klein schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use a Persistent Ordered dict.
> I use OrderedDict (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict).
> How can I append Persistent mechanism to this OrderedDict class ?
What is the particular problem? As loo
Running Plone 4.0.5, Zope 2.12, ZODB 3.9.5.
Occasionally I receive the following error after starting my instance
after the first request.
There is no way to recover out other than restarting the
instance...then everything is fine.
I don't know why this happens from time to time...any clue?
Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
> What does the code of the dgho...UserDataSchemaProvider class look
> like? I'm assuming it's similar to the one from plone.app.users that
> looks like:
>
> class UserDataSchemaProvider(object):
> implements(IUserData
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Jup - basically a stripped down version of
>>
>> http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/collective.examples.userdata/trunk/collective/examples/use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> The question is more why this error is happening from time to time after
>> the startup after the first request - this scares me a bit. I also
>>
I have a customer site (Plone 3.0.6) causing an error during packing:
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish
Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in mapply
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 42, in call_object
Module , line 3, in _facade
Module AccessControl.requestmethod, line 64,
Jim Fulton wrote:
2011-07-14 13:36:22 INFO Z2 Shutting down
That error message seems rather weird. WTF SIGINT?
Likely caused during the Zope shutdown amd unrelated).
Use multi-zodb-check-refs with the -r option to get a database of
reverse references.
Use that do figure out what's refe
Jim Fulton wrote:
I wouldn't normally suggest what I'm about to suggest, but I think you
have enough ZODB foo. :)
I would try adding a new bucket with that oid. Maybe you can even
stuff it in the connection cache to avoid committing it to the
database. I'm not sure off hand what the steps re
Hi there,
this month is Poskey-error fixing month - so I can across a different
problem with another site.
Environment: Zope 2.12.18, Plone ZODB 3.9.5, Plone 4.0.7
Plone gives us the following error:
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 127, in publish
Module ZPublish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The ZODB basically does only append to the database file (Data.fs).
Only packing (e.g. through zeopack) will write a new (and smaller)
Data.fs file containing the referenced "life" objects.
- -aj
刘一新 wrote:
> I found that the size of the storage file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Very cool and excellent work.
Andreas
Stephan Richter wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> as you might have seen from my checkins on Friday, I released
> mongopersist. In short, it implements a persistence backend in
> MongoDB (that, with a little bit of effo
PYTHONPATH=/soft/Plone/Zope-2.10.9-final-py2.4/lib/python/ZEO
This is wrong. You must not include the package itself into the PATH
(that's why it is call path). /lib/python is good enough
-aj
Ricardo Dias Marques wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting an error when trying to run zeopack (zeopack.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am receiving the following weird error with a fresh Plone 4.2b2
sandbox during development tests. At least the "Versions" error message
confuses me since the installation including ZODB Data.fs file
is usually fresh.
Andreas
File
"/home/ajung/.bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The issue was possibly caused by a regression with the sauna.reload
add-on for Plone...now checking a new version of sauna.reload.
- -aj
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I am receiving the following weird error with a fresh Plone 4.2b2
> sandbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikko Ohtamaa wrote:
> sauna.reload increases your changes of corruption Data.fs as it
> forcefully restarts Zope instance very often and makes other bad things
> happen.
I would say that the sauna.reload 0.4.1+2 versions were the primary
reason fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
a customer made the observation that that ZEO clients
became inconsistent after some time (large CMF-based application
running on Zope 2.12 afaik). Customer made some investigation and
noticed that the ZEO invalidations have been queued (in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Andreas Jung
> wrote:
>> a customer made the observation that that ZEO clients became
>> inconsistent after some time (large CMF-based application running
>> on Zope 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed a strange behavior with packing a storage having lots of data
in a blob storage (Plone 4.2, Zope 2.13).
I had a large Plone site (5 GB of data in blobstorage) in a dedicated
storage. I removed the Plone Site object and packed the storage thr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Andreas Jung
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I noticed a strange behavior with packing a storage having lots of
>> data in a blob
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Andreas Jung
>>> wrote:
>>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we have a Plone 4.2 setup running ZEO with 3 application servers
and a non-shared blob setup, ZODB3-3.10.5-py2.7-linux-i686
We see massive amounts of the following error message on every
application server. The application servers are confi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Andreas Jung
> wrote: Hi there,
>
> we have a Plone 4.2 setup running ZEO with 3 application servers and
> a non-shared blob setup, ZODB3-3.10.5-py2.7-linux-i686
>
> We see m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is an official API and/or a way to iterate
> through all objects in a ZODB database. I found an implementation at
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2002-October/003483.html,
> but I w
--On 29. Mai 2005 11:29:06 +0200 Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, den 21.05.2005, 17:38 +0200 schrieb Christian Heimes:
Grab the Zope2 sources and read lib/python/OFS/Image.py. Zope's
OFS.Image.Image class (and also Zope3's implementation) is using a so
called possible
--On 27. Juni 2005 11:56:13 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Sidnei da Silva]
I would expect a 2.8.1 soon, as in no longer than 3 weeks from now tops.
There's this bug which I would consider 'serious' and another issue with
the last-minute inclusion of BTreeFolder2 breaking CMF 1.
--On 29. Juni 2005 10:38:27 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Andreas Jung]
The Plone guys asked about a 2.8.1 release for end of July/start of
August which should not be a problem. Since they are working on making
Plone 2.1 work with Zope 2.8 there is a good chance that f
--On 21. September 2005 12:33:47 +0200 Tóth Zoltán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello!
Can I change Zope Object Database to PostgeSQL database?
Why do you want to do that? As far as I know there is no dedicated
storage for available for Postgres except using frameworks like Ape
or SQLStora
place, practicaly in postgesql in another server.
thanx
Zoli
- Original Message - From: "Andreas Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tóth Zoltán" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ZODB-Dev] Change ZODB to PostgreSQL data
--On 13. Oktober 2005 00:52:02 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If one thread writes to an object on one connection, and another thread
does the same on another connection, then one calls transaction.commit(),
will the all the changes in both connections be commited? Is there a
--On 13. Oktober 2005 01:45:30 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed that if a ZEOServer client doesn't have the definition for an
object's class, it loads it as a broken object. Is there any way to fix
the broken object by obtaining the class source from the server?
Yo
--On 13. Oktober 2005 01:33:14 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 13. Oktober 2005 00:52:02 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If one thread writes to an object on one connection, and another thread
does the same on anothe
--On 13. Oktober 2005 02:44:34 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand that, but my point was when you call transaction.commit(),
you don't necessarily know what you're committing. One thread may be
ready to commit. Another may not be. If one thread calls
transaction.abo
--On 13. Oktober 2005 02:54:51 -0400 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But what if the client doesn't know what sources it's supposed to have?
What if it only has a limited understanding of the objects, and needs to
load certain objects on the server from scratch. Is this really a
n
--On 13. Oktober 2005 09:51:22 +0200 Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
While it would certainly be nice if the ZEO server could deliver
codeobjects too. In Theory and with much much bad hackery (overwriting
__import__ and friends) it could be possible. Jim?
This would especially b
--On 13. Oktober 2005 09:46:43 +0100 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Sounds like a total insane idea to me to use ZEO to distribute code :-)
Yeah, 'cos ZODB-based Script (Python)'s and ZPT's aren't "code" :-P
We ar
Possibly a stupid question:
Last night the European clocks switched back to winter-time.
So the ZODB might see multiple timestamps (and unordered transaction) from
transactions happened between 2am and 3am...just for curiosity: is there a
risk getting an inconsistent ZODB?
Andreas
pgp2eIOfcTL
--On 30. Oktober 2005 22:17:44 -0500 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Second, time-stamp skew doesn't lead to inconsistency.
Fleshing out a bit, ZODB uses time.gmtime() as a starting point, not
necessarily as its final timestamp. When generating a new tid, if
time.gmtime() is <= the l
--On 4. Dezember 2005 16:32:50 -0500 Chris Spencer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an existing way to search for objects in ZODB based on criteria?
For example, how could I retrieve all instances of a particular class, or
all objects with a __dict__ key equal to "value"?
You mean ZCat
--On 9. Dezember 2005 12:05:23 +0500 Victor Safronovich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello zodb-dev!
Is this a correct behaviour?
from BTrees.IIBTree import IIBTree
t = IIBTree(map(None,range(5),range(5)))
list(t.keys())
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
k = t.keys()
list(k)
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
del t[0]
list(
--On 9. Dezember 2005 12:53:25 +0500 Victor Safronovich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andreas Jung,
Friday, December 9, 2005, 12:17:36 PM, you wrote:
AJ> That's different from my instance (Zope HEAD):
You are right :), i use ZODB 3.1.5. Ok, i try on ZODB 3.4.0 this
--On 4. Januar 2006 14:38:13 -0500 Tamas Hegedus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no
stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense.
Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone ZCatalo
--On 4. Januar 2006 15:11:37 -0500 Tamas Hegedus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am not a programmer. This is the source of all my problems. I just did
not have the patient (and knowledge) to learn to develop zope
applications. But I want to stick with Python and I need a transparent
(object) dat
--On 9. Januar 2006 16:35:31 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If that is the case then I intend to:
1. move the definitions of zope's specific levels (trace and blather)
into a more prominent place (ZODB also defines these levels, but it has
to be an independent package),
--On 9. Januar 2006 10:55:21 -0500 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB package
that actually uses these levels.
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
Sufficently enough for me. BLATHER & TRACE can be merged to DEBUG
and PROBLEM to either WARN|ERROR. This should be even enough for Zope.
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:40:26 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:25, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently
--On 10. Januar 2006 10:51:04 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I find all this fairly self-evident and highly useful, and se
absolutely zero reason for removing them, when they are so useful.
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
We're now wor
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:09:32 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
How do you mean? As far as I can see, all the levels are still there in
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:44:31 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't have an opinion on solution yet.
What I want is something easy to use wher you can just import a log
method or object and make a function. I don't want to set things up,
because if we need to set things up
--On 10. Januar 2006 12:20:14 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This means basically keeping zLOG since it is only a very thin logging
module wrapper. So why did we deprecate zLOG? :-)
Did we? It was impl
Hi,
I have the following code in side a Plone app. The intent of this method is
to perform a logging of changed Archetype fields. This code basically works
but under some unknown circumstances I get error below where the
transaction module seems to be None?! There is no product refreshing
en
--On 26. Mai 2006 01:46:26 -0300 David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am curious how folks are handling authentication for ZEO in a general
way (client against the server). Is is common to attempt to use
user/passwords from acl in zope as a means of creating a lists for
authenticating agai
--On 26. Mai 2006 16:47:41 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2006, at 16:43, Benji York wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
You could use a firewall to allow incoming ZEO connection only
from authorized IP address...shou
--On 23. Juni 2006 14:27:52 +0200 Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I know it is not easy, but I need some advices to keep our bosses
happy at the planning stage of our application.
The application we are planning is a document management application
which follows documents i
--On 23. Juni 2006 16:05:49 +0200 Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AJ> We run a CMS with several ZEO storages using FileStorage with up 300k
AJ> different objects per storage.
May you mention some or some sites on the internet that run Zope/ZODB
to have some examples?
Since ZODB is
--On 23. Juni 2006 17:51:35 +0200 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTrees perform best when keys' prefixes are randomly distributed.
So if your application generates keys like 'foo001', 'foo002',... you'll
get lots of conflicts. Same for consecutive integers in IOBTree.
hm..
--On 24. Juni 2006 08:53:43 +0200 Roché Compaan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am curious what other strategies besides QueueCatalog you employ? Do
you ever use multiple backends for your apps? How do you decide that
this data belongs in a relational backend? How structured must the data
be, o
--On 24. Juni 2006 21:08:03 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-6-24 09:24 +0200:
...
One particular app that I have been working on uses very complex queries
with lots of join etcit would be hard model to implement such
queries on top of th
--On 25. Juni 2006 21:33:21 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-6-24 22:36 +0200:
...
The ZODB model (object data stored in a storage with behaviour
coded in the clients) is powerful enough to simply
implement the relational databas
--On 26. Juni 2006 14:02:20 +0100 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
BTrees perform best when keys' prefixes are randomly distributed.
So if your application generates keys like 'foo001', 'foo002',... you'll
get lots of conflicts. Same for consecutive integer
--On 16. August 2006 10:52:51 +0200 Adam Groszer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Dieter,
Do you think that's possible?
This is not the question. With some effort you can develop almost
everything...you just have to find a volunteer and a budget :-)
-aj
pgpsTnNtwrvDx.pgp
Description: PGP
--On 11. September 2006 16:20:31 -0500 "Edward K. Ream"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Several of Leo's users have suggested that Leo could use the zodb instead
of reading and writing files.
Leo?
-aj
pgpYVlVr2dugO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
--On 17. November 2006 20:23:07 -0800 Mark Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi All! This is a great list!
I have been having trouble importing a custom XML Article that I have
previously Exported
and have been getting this error:
IndexError: list index out of range
The traceback:
*
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
