On 04/18/12 02:42 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
El 2012-04-18 19.22, Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph.D escribió:
hi
may be one could add
in solaris resource control used to be project based
one need to setup project and limit the resoure pool
then assign the poll to zone.
it is not easy to
Never seen this failure before.
Is it possible that you ran out of disk space?
For reference, which opensolaris build (cat /etc/release, and uname
-v). Did you do any upgrading? If so, from which prior build?
It seems that you've lost your /etc/zones/index file. Perhaps there is
a
Look for unmount on this page:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19797-01/817-1592/gjwmp/index.html
On 04/ 6/11 06:18 AM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed 06 Apr 2011 at 02:33AM, Ketan wrote:
I was testing of migrating the solaris10 zone to solaris 11 express zone. I
used cpio to create the
When pooladm -c is done to commit the configuration, it will try and
satisfy the min/max constraints of all psets.
In your case, there are plenty of cpus, so pset1 gets 5 cpus. If you
had more psets configured, there might not be enough cpus to give pset1
5 cpus.
If the pset.min off all
Do you mean zone_caps? You are looking at project_caps.
On 12/13/10 01:50 AM, Ketan wrote:
Ok got it .. but still if i want to check what's current usage by a whole
zone/project for locked-memory what would be the best way .. i 'm using
kstat -c project_caps -n 'lockedmem*'
but with this
On 11/18/10 12:38 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/19/10 09:12 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
What build are you upgrading from?
134 through 134b as recommended in the release notes.
Is this during the attach -u portion of the upgrade for each zone?
It happens after rebooting into the new BE. I
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Steve Lawrence
stephen.lawre...@oracle.com wrote:
Now, if you want to account for cpu utilization by children,
why not use the pr_ctime member of the psinfo structure?
As far as I understand it, that collects cpu for child processes
Peter Tribble wrote:
Looking at the recent zonestat arc case reminded me of something
I've been meaning to ask for a while.
In the case, it says:
prstat polls /proc, and will not account for
cpu used by short-lived processes.
and
Extended accounting must be used to
compute
Did you try:
# zoneadm attach -z bibcmi4 -d rpool/zones/bibcmi4/ROOT/zbe-2
-d is an ipkg specific option.
-Steve L.
Gerard Henry wrote:
hello all,
i need to move zones from serv1 to serv2. Every server is os2009.06 b111b
On serv1, i have, after detach:
serv1 # zfs list -r
Try zfs-discuss.
Ketan wrote:
We are having a server running zfs root with 64G RAM and the system has 3 zones running oracle fusion app and zfs cache is using 40G memory as per
kstat zfs:0:arcstats:size. and system shows only 5G of memory is free rest is taken by kernel and 2 remaining
The bug mentions that this can also impact a nevada zone that was p2v'ed.
Should you fix usr/src/lib/brand/native/zone as well?
-Steve
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129
Minor nit. You could use != POC_STRING, put the Z_NO_ENTRY in the {}, and
put the success case after. Not a required change.
LGTM.
-Steve
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:28:52PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I expanded my webrev to include my fix for
6910339 zonecfg coredumps with badly formed
I recommend using libumem on the application.
Some folks were nice enough to write about it.
http://blogs.sun.com/pnayak/entry/finding_memory_leaks_within_solaris
http://blogs.sun.com/dlutz/entry/memory_leak_detection_with_libumem
-Steve
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:09:11PM +0200,
a memory leak and on local zone there is ?!
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I recommend using libumem on the application.
Some folks were nice enough to write about it.
[1]http://blogs.sun.com/pnayak/entry/finding_memory_leaks_within_solaris
[2]http://blogs.sun.com/dlutz/entry
Looks a lot like 6894901. Can you try build 128?
-Steve
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:48:52PM -0500, Glenn Brunette wrote:
As part of some Immutable Service Container[1] demonstration that I am
creating for an event in January. I have the need to start/stop a zone
quite a few times (as part
Feature. It is the F_WRLCK operation which takes the lock. I suppose this
avoids having to deal with stale lock files from dead zoneadm's.
Similar for the door. The door file is he who fattaches, not he who
creates the door file.
Saying that, I don't see a problem with the unlock/fdetach
This feature exists in nevada, (nevada global to nevada zone), and is
currently being backported to s10u9.
-Steve L.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:41:03AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao wrote:
hi
Is there p2v in s10 to move from physical host to zone env?
It seems that cpio of the apps directory
It limits the amount of physical memory that can be pinned by a zone by
mlock() or shmat(SHM_SHARE_MMU). These are typically done by databases
or performance critical apps.
locked memory cannot be paged out.
-Steve L.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:25:01AM -0700, Ketan wrote:
So for what purpose
There is a kstat. Look at the output of:
$ kstat -c project_caps -n 'lockedmem*'
-Steve L.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:43:03AM -0700, Ketan wrote:
But there is one more thing if i set max-rss i can test it and see the task
under specified project does not exceeds the specified rss value but
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:20:14AM -0700, Ketan wrote:
Can anyone answer my questions
1. Whats the difference between project.max-locked-memory and max-rss.
And out these 2 which is the preferred way of limiting the physical memory in
a project or zone.
max-rss limits both pageable and
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:43:05AM +0200, Martin Rehak wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 2009.07.23 14:34:22 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:14:55AM +0200, Martin Rehak wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 2009.07.22 12:32:01 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
The issue is that from
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 09:14:55AM +0200, Martin Rehak wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 2009.07.22 12:32:01 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
The issue is that from the global zone context (non-zlogin), stuff like
symbolic links to something like /etc could copy files from the global
zone.
I don't
The issue is that from the global zone context (non-zlogin), stuff like
symbolic links to something like /etc could copy files from the global
zone.
I'm not sure why this is dangerous in this case, as we are only reading
from the zone, as cpio does not traverse/open sym links, it just copes the
If you want to configure the ip addresss within the zone with
sysidcfg/hostname.* files, then you need to use exclusive ip stack zones:
zonecfg -z zweb$Z set iptype=exclusive
-Steve L.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 03:55:27PM -0700, Patrick J. McEvoy wrote:
the only thing that comes to mind
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:00:28PM +0200, William Roche wrote:
Hello Vladi,
Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system providing
r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.
NFS mount in your local zones of a file system shared by the global zone is
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:59:04 -0700
From: Steve Lawrence stephen.lawre...@sun.com
To: Rich Teer rich.t...@rite-group.com
Cc: Zones discuss zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Weird Solaris 8 container problem
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Steve Lawrence wrote:
That's correct. You need only install the 1.0.1 SUNWs?brandk package for
each, which enable the brand(s).
Cool. So I don't need to install the packages under the 1.0 tree before
I
S8C and S9C do not run on sxce or opensolaris. They can be hosted on
Solaris 10, using any filesystem which supports zones, including zfs.
-Steve L.
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:06:10PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install a Solaris 8 branded zone on a 280R running
SXCE
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:12:00PM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hi Steve,
S8C and S9C do not run on sxce or opensolaris. They can be hosted on
Solaris 10, using any filesystem which supports zones, including zfs.
Thanks for confirming the bad news
be able to use mdb -k on the live system, and issue dcmds similar
to the comments of 6272846. No need to force a crashdump or take a live
crashdump.
-Steve L.
Derek
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Steve Lawrence
[1]stephen.lawre...@sun.com wrote:
zsched is always unkillable
they are not public.
Is that something you can pass along?
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Steve Lawrence
[1]stephen.lawre...@sun.com wrote:
* *I already tried killing the zoneadmd process and issuing the halt
and all
* *it does is start back up the zoneadmd process and hang
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:22:25PM -0500, Jeff Victor wrote:
Thanks for the great feedback Gael. Comments below.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Gael gael.marti...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jeff Victor jeff.j.vic...@gmail.com wrote:
Some questions:
1. Do you
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 04:12:19PM -0500, Jeff Victor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Steve Lawrence stephen.lawre...@sun.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:22:25PM -0500, Jeff Victor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Gael gael.marti...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4
:
physical: 4G
[swap: 6G]
Is that correct?
I just reread the documentation about swap and from that it's not clear
to me that swap in the zone configuration is used that way
regards
Bernd
Steve Lawrence wrote:
Swap limits how much of the systems total memory (ram
Swap limits how much of the systems total memory (ram + disk) can be reserved.
When this limit is hit, allocations, such as malloc, will fail. Physical
memory limits resident memory. When this limit is hit, the zone will page
pages in memory to disk swap.
In general, your example config is only
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:20:43AM -0500, Dr. Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) wrote:
anyone know when the brandz for s10 will be out?
e.g. running s10 with opensolaris zone?
No target has been set for this. We cannot reasonably manage such a
project until s10 begins taking less change. The
The other way that the global zone identity normally leaks through to the
non-global zones is through the system's hostid. So if you compare the
output of `/usr/bin/hostid` with `for e in $allglobalzones ; do ssh $e
/usr/bin/hostid ; done`, you can easily see which global zone matches your
I think you need this or later:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=666context=SSTFZRuid=swg21254543loc=en_UScs=utf-8lang=en
Some ibm docs:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmreadme.doc/readme_server541.html
During the zone installation and after the zone is installed, the zone's ZBE1
dataset is explicitly mounted by the global zone onto the zone root (note, the
dataset is a ZFS legacy mount so zones infrastructure itself must manage the
mounting. It uses the dataset properties to determine which
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:54:14PM -0700, Jordan Brown wrote:
[ Which brain-dead mail client turns all of the spaces in the Subject
into tabs? ]
Zones folks: the current proposed answers to this problem involve
moving system/filesystem/local into milestone/single-user. That was
The list of use cases is really pretty simple:
1) Administrator has in hand a patch that says install in single user
mode. What does this administrator do? The answer seems self-evident:
take the system to single-user mode (either by booting the system in
single-user mode using boot
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:01:43PM -0700, Jordan Brown wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
A. Make patchadd verify that the system is in single user milestone when
installing a single-user patch.
That's a non-starter. *Many* of our customers ignore our recommendation
to install patches
So you want to be able to interrupt any boot to any milestone, and instead do
the patch processing if a patch is pending. You basically want to interrupt
the current milestone, and instead just boot to filesystem-local and do the
patching.
The question is, can the smf milestone be changed
2. Create patch-install-milestone, which depends on patch-install-service
below.
The patch-install-milestone could also depend on single-user and
filesystem-local so that it is generally useful for admins manually
installing patches as well, even if they don't have
By default, a zone does not have privilege to snoop:
http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/snoop_zoney_zone
Could just be a network config/routing issue. Can you ping 10.5.185.103?
Can you access other network services, like ssh?
-Steve L.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 03:01:37PM -0700, Russ
The only way that you can get *that* guarantee is by using the
milestone mechanism to limit the system to a particular milestone, as
you suggest.
In fact, argh. This problem affects even your proposed scheme. By the
time that your patch-test-service is running, there could (in
You could try:
s8 cpio patch:112097-08
s8 compress patch:108823-02
s8 flar patch:109318-39 (requires some other patches)
You could be hitting 4384301, fixed in 109318-12, which was obsoleted
by the flar patch above.
-Steve L.
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 04:58:40PM -0400,
My guess is that your zones lack /var/ruby.*
Did you install ruby+friends in the global zone using packages, from
a tar file, or from source compilation? A package install from the global
zone should install the package contents into all zones, properly handling
/usr verses /var.
If your means
As of s10u4, (and nevada build 56?) rcapd (and prstat -ZJTta) account for
shared memory (both sysV, anon, and text) between processes in the same zone,
project, etc.
-Steve L.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Brian Smith wrote:
My reading of the documentation is that if I try to cap
Hey Darren,
Are you interested in drafting an arc fasttrack for these interface additions?
Do you see zoneadm being used as:
# zoneadm boot myzone -s
That would be:
- myzone is an operand to zoneadm that comes after the subcommand.
This is not compliant with getopt or clip
Are you running sparc or x86? On x86, you can use Xen or Virtualbox today
to run s10 guests. On sparc, you can use ldoms on sun4v. If you indeed need
a zones-based solution, please elaborate on your requirements.
-Thanks,
-Steve L.
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:41:29AM +1000, Rodney Lindner -
Hey Jerry,
Does this address this comment in 6621020:
This appears to point out at least one bug in zlogin, namely that it
keeps stdout_pipe[1] and stderr_pipe[1] from noninteractive_login()
open when returning to the parent.
Basically, I think the filer expected to see something like:
It seems to me that the first comment in the NOTES section of fork(2) would
only apply to vfork().
??
-Steve
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:31:58PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Hi,
I just stumbled over this:
Edward Pilatowicz schrieb:
- nit: in start_zoneadmd(), instead of:
if
In the global zone, do you have two ip addresses (one on vnet0, one on vnet1)
or is vnet1 configured as standby?
Steve L.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:12:35AM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 13:56 -0700, Steve Lawrence wrote:
It is documented here:
http://docs.sun.com
This appears to be the affect of selecting an interface that is a member
of an ipmp group in the global zone.
It is documented here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/z.admin.task-60?l=koa=viewq=multipathing
The behavior you are seeing is not specifically documented, but it seems
/usr/bin/tar on solaris 10.
My comment was incorrect. I was referring to the preservation of hard links.
I need to investigate the status of this in the various verions of tar.
Thanks,
-Steve L.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Steve Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED
the only
stable way of solving this issue.
Regards,
Mehmet
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Steve Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently don't have p2v support for native zones. Future work for
this
is under consideration, but no timeframe
zone reboot is required.
-Steve L.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:20:40PM +0100, Terry Smith wrote:
Hi
When adding dedicated-cpus to a zone does the configuration take effect
immediately or is a zone reboot required?
T
___
zones-discuss mailing
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:11:12AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
Looks like the environment contained in /etc/default/init is
read and set
by startd and init. Since zlogin'ed processes are not child
of startd or init
in the zone, they do not have these environment
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:17:42PM -0600, Mike Gerdts wrote:
I just got a chance to start playing with the capped memory resource
controls in build 56. At first blush, this looks to be *very* good
stuff. My initial testing included some very basic single process
memory hog tests and multiple
The short answer is no.
When a processor is transfered from one pset to another, no RCM event is
generated in the global zone, or in any non-global zones. RCM events are only
generated when DR operations take place.
The rcm_daemon only runs in the global zone, as part of the sysevent:default
Good question. These are essentially virtual system
requirements.
What is the behaviour of Solaris intended to be when someone
makes these changes (or attempts to make them) on a system
that has no swap space?
All systems have reservable swap space. Systems with no swap
devices use
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:02:48PM -0800, Gary Winiger wrote:
First off, sorry for the stutter in the spec update mail.
The project team didn't supply a summary of the changes, so I'll be
asking for one in a follow on.
I've addressed your comments way below. Here is my change
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:28:31PM -0800, Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 31 Oct 2006 at 03:24PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
It seems reasonable to amend this case to say:
1.
Any process with priv_sys_resource running in the global zone's
system project (project 0) will not subject
I am working on a new spec. I have an unanswered question from the
discussion:
The SIZE column will also be changed to SWAP for prstat
options a, T, and J, for users, tasks, and projects.
The reason for not changing this column in the default output would be
helpful.
I have a
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:36:45AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
Given a lack of supportive feedback, I'm going to revoke the proposed
amendment
below. To mitigate a zone admin setting a problematic swap limit on the
global
zone, we will enhance zonecfg to:
1
I'm not sure it is within the domain of this case to to tell admins what they
should and shouldn't use the global zone for.
In any event, we are making it easy for admins to manage swap limits for zones
via zonecfg.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:58:24PM -0800, Michael Barto wrote:
After all thus
problem.
-Steve
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:24:18PM -0800, Steve Lawrence wrote:
I'm looking for this case to define how to preserve the current
model of unlimited unless one asks for a limit model in the
global zone. I believe it is important from a system
Would it be reasonable to propose special treatment of the global project 0
for all project and zone rctls? Once could argue that capping system
daemons
can only lead some sort of undesireable system failure.
This would of course exempt all global zone system daemons from resource
Comments inline. I've snipped stuff not relevant to comments.
4. prstat(1m) output changes to report swap reserved.
INTERFACE COMMITMENT BINDING
prstat(1m) output Uncommitted Patch
This case proposes changing
70 matches
Mail list logo
