Thanks for this!
Looks like that test failure is incidental and not symptomatic of
changes made to ZODB. I think Tres may have said that it can be
fixed by merging in a fix from the Five HEAD, but I don't know this
for fact first-hand.
It's encouraging that most of the tests pass but the
I lied. Due to completely preventable circumstances, this merge won't
be done tonight; instead, it will be done tomorrow evening.
- C
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 16:41 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> [Chris McDonough]
> > Thanks for this!
>
> Not required, so long as I get to thank
x27;ll
work it out, but I've got my nose in Subversion documentation at the
moment.
On Oct 27, 2005, at 1:09 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I lied. Due to completely preventable circumstances, this merge won't
be done tonight; instead, it will be done tomorrow evening.
- C
On Mon,
Jim redid the way Zope trunk stitches in Zope3 since you last looked
at this, and that can create some mechanical problems (of the kinds
you're seeing, in fact). The svn docs probably won't help.
Suggestion (which is repetition of what I suggested before this
happened, but we'll gracefully let t
On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
svn:externals suck. A lot. As Tim suggested, you could throw away
this check out and start over. A simpler thing you could do is to
remove the zope directory and do an svn up.
That sounds reasonable, but I've done both of those things and no joy
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 10:12 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> Ah, it's the properties on lib/python that are screwing us here! Chris, throw
>
> svn revert lib/python
>
> into the mix too. That got me unstuck. The problem is that both Jim
> and I (at least) changed the set of externals listed in l
ratively.
That said, all existing tests pass and I did do some interactive
stress-testing of the sessioning mount point, both of which made me feel
comfortable enough to go ahead and do the merge.
Enjoy,
- C
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:53 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 10:12 -04
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 17:18 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
> > This merge has been done.
> >
> > Since "zopectl test " no longer appears to do the right
> > thing
>
> Could you be more specific?
Your checkin after I did the merge
Nobody has yet reported a memory leak symptom against any particular
piece of Zope 2.8.X yet, AFAIK.
On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Dan Pozmanter wrote:
Ahoy,
I was poking around in _Acquisition.c, and noticed my memory
usage spiked.
Returning to the vanilla code (2.8.2-final), I noticed
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:14 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
> >
> >
> > Farce?
>
> We aren't running the real configure.
If you mean autotool
I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
supposed to make the branch. I have just gone ahead and made it.
But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.
- C
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:
Yep, it's a free-for-all again. ;-) Although probably it's better to
create a branch and get some consensus before merging it as opposed to
landing stuff directly on the trunk.
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 22:14 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:59:45PM -0500, Ch
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >
> >>Chris McDonough wrote:
> >>
> >>>I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
&
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> --On 13. November 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > I appreciate that you were trying to help.
> > I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)
> >
> >
>
> svn delete should solve that problem
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:07 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Branches aka new features should be merged into the
> HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but
> be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state and to be able to cut a
> release branch at any time.
Yup
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not. But there
> needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness.
To create the branch or a beta release? I realize there's a desire to
tie these acts together but still don't ful
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:07 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not. But there
> > needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness.
>
> To create the br
FWIW, a patched setup.py that appears to compile all known Z2 and Z3
extensions successfully (at least it completes and Zope starts) which
doesn't use any zpkg extensions is available at
http://www.plope.com/static/misc/setup.py . I took this from the old
"setup.py" before Phil checked in his zpkg
On Nov 20, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
[Intended for zope-dev actually...]
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Ok I got to the reasons for that, it all dates back to the origins of
SecurityInfo in December 2000 when it originally had methods that did
the work of both declareProtected and
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Conflicts and how they interact with the database and sessioning
machinery
is my hot button right at the moment )-: I Hope I have not
included too much information.
I ran a quick report and we see about 1000 conflicts per hour at
about 1200
These are order of magnitude numbers and are
highly variable. The 1% number is way bigger than I am
comfortable with
although I have no basis to scale my expectations. I'd be much
happier were
it a couple of orders of magnitude smaller.
I would be too. It's considerably difficult when
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 04:56 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> I think Martin Aspeli is not the only one who still has no clue on how to
> move forward
> beyond a certain Fivization of his Zope 2 products. If you do, then that's
> great, but I
> don't think everyone is in that fortunate si
On Nov 24, 2005, at 8:37 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I recall a slightly different discussion I was involved in. I
remember Zope 2 core developers worrying about the inclusion of
Five in Zope 2.8; they were worried they'd need to maintain its
codebase.
I was one of these people. Since the
On Nov 24, 2005, at 6:42 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 24 November 2005 01:39, Chris McDonough wrote:
- There doesn't seem to be as much of a commitment in the
Z3 community to backwards compatibility as
there is for Z2. Notes like Stephan's last one where
he says &q
On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:25 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
2005/11/24, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Interestingly, you can raise things that don't subclass Exception in
python. This was discussed before, and I firmly agree with, that zodb
conflicts should _not_ sublcass exception. That way, ther
+1
On Dec 1, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
I've improved the logging of ConflictError in Zope 2.9 and trunk.
http://svn.zope.org/?rev=40454&view=rev
Now you'll get two things:
- logs at level BLATHER for each conflict, but it may be retried
- log at level ERROR when the conflict
I initially gave Florent's proposal a +1 because frankly I'm kinda
sick of answering people's questions about conflict "errors" (this
deserves some treatment in docs actually). But I do agree that it is
useful to be able to see conflict errors in non-blather logs when you
*do* know what th
On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:00 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Please vote for the level at which you want to log retried conflict
errors. These are the ConflictErrors that aren't returned to the
user but automatically retried by the Zope publisher.
1. Do you want these ConflictErrors retried logs t
On Dec 3, 2005, at 11:08 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 3 Dec 2005, at 15:57, Paul Winkler wrote:
One thought that occurs to me is to replace httplib.HTTPConnection
with
a mock object of some sort that allows easy verification of its
input.
So we assume that httplib works, as a proper unit t
FYI: These tests appear to be failing due to a race in the tests
they're exercising that could be exposed if the machine was under
heavy load or just particularly slow.
On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:01 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Dec 13
Code would be good.
Note that changing the transientobject conflict resolution algorithm
won't get rid of all write conflict errors, because the BTree-based
indexes in the transient object container will still conflict during
a "bucket split" and other situations that I can't exactly recall
Trimmed zodb-dev off the cc list.
On Dec 15, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
The systems are running a Zope/ZEO combination with a store
configuration
of:
#
# Temporary storage database (for sessions)
name temporary storage for sessioning
mount-point /t
Looks good!
On Dec 15, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I would like to merge this patch to all the branches back to Zope 2.7,
anyone would care to review or is against it?
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1976
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com
__
On Dec 20, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Dennis Allison wrote:
The interaction between sessions, conflicts, and persistence is a bit
confusing. I am still trying to understand the code in depth.
One thing is for sure, request.SESSION and/or request['SESSION']
must be
persistent for things to work. M
+1 on all.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 1:52 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
for next release we plan to replace several parts with the
corresponding components from Zope 3 (e.g. ZPT´). Philipp is
working on a proposal on that issue. In addition I would like to
get rid of some old stuff that is no lo
On Dec 20, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Paul Winkler wrote:
- HelpSys - from a programmers view pretty much useless and not very
helpful. I consider to replace it with something more useful
(not sure
we can re-use apidoc from Zope 3 in some way, perhaps the inclusion
of Dieter's Docfinder might
On Dec 20, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Speaking of eggs, could you please add this to the 2.10 wiki? :-)
Done...
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encodi
On Dec 20, 2005, at 3:29 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
If so, the question then becomes: timetable and plan for deprecating
HelpSys. I don't think we can simply rip out registerHelp() in 2.10
unless we have deprecation warnings in 2.9; and a useful deprecation
warning requires something in place we ca
On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
But I'm not sure I understand you.
Are you saying that in order to use Basket, my product can't call
registerHelp()?
Or are you saying that when installed via Basket, registerHelp()
does nothing? That's fine.
Yep, the latter currently...
_
Hmmm... I *think* I just fixed this.
On Dec 21, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
...
Failure in test test_checkPermission_proxy_roles_limit_access
(AccessControl.tests.testZopeSecurityPolicy.C_ZSPTests)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "c:\python24\lib\unittest.py", l
On Dec 22, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 20. Dezember 2005 16:41:37 -0500 Chris McDonough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
But I'm not sure I understand you.
Are you saying that in order to use Basket, my product
I'm looking for opinions here..
The next major Zope 2 release and perhaps the next major Zope 3
release will support the loading of packages and (for Zope 2)
Products from Python "Egg" files. See http://peak.telecommunity.com/
DevCenter/PythonEggs for an overview.
This provides the follow
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:16 AM, Stefane Fermigier wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm looking for opinions here..
The progenitor of Eggs (Phillip Eby) suggests that this is too
implicit. He suggests instead that people who install packages
should
use a program which implicitly ins
AFAIK, there is no Data.fs.in file anymore and the "OFS.Application"
logic creates all the objects it needs at startup time.
Quickstart text is in lib/python/App/dtml/zope_quick_start.dtml (it's
not read from ZODB at all).
- C
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:26 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Does anyone k
That's fine. It moved to plope.com because it was under pretty heavy
development and zope.org was (and probably still is) too slow to be
responsive when lots of writes were done. IIRC its DAV was broken
too. It's not under development at all anymore, so it can move back,
at least until
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 09:09:02 -0500 Chris McDonough
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The question is this: do you think there should be an explicit
"install"
step for egg packages/Products or do you think it should be
The next tick will happen regardless, because "handle" invokes a
publisher thread (it doesn't block).
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
What happens if the request started by clockserver takes a long
time or hangs?
Will the next tick start a new one anyway, or will it b
Forwarding to the list for "chewing"... ;-)
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 10:08 AM 12/22/2005 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
The progenitor of Eggs (Phillip Eby) suggests that this is too
implicit. He suggests instead that people who install packages
sh
On Dec 22, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
The question is this: do you think there should be an explicit
"install" step for egg packages/Products or do you think it should be
possible to just put eggs on your PYTHONPATH (and perhaps adjust a
config
sqlite is public domain code, FWIW. I doubt this is incompatible
with the ZPL. It would just require an acknowledgement from ZC that
it's "safe" to be included in a Zope distro.
- C
On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 22. Dezember 2005 11:42:30 -0330
Kudos for releasing these packages -- they all look interesting and
potentially useful.
Agreed, bravo!!
- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related l
gt; http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
--
Chris McDonough Digital Creations, Inc.
Publishers of Zopehttp://www.zope.org
""" Killing hundreds of birds with thousands
It should work just like a normal mapping.
If it doesn't, and if you can reproduce the bug, we can fix it.
- C
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Enge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:52 AM
Subject: [Zope-dev] PersistentMapping
> Hi,
>
> I'm
Someone (Shane?) claimed that 2.4.1 removes this "optimization".
- Original Message -
From: "R. David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "George Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Z2.log file not showing use
> What would the reaction be to changing this behavior. I have written some
> code that automatically populates the index when it is added. I personally
> think that reindexing every index just to populate one is grossly
inefficient.
I think populating only one index on add is a great idea... the
ML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>
--
Chris McDonoughZope Corporation
http://www.zope.org http://www.zope.com
"Killing hundreds of birds wi
You may want to ask these questions on the zodb-dev list instead of on
here... more likely to get the answers in a timely way..
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dieter Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:4
ev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
>>** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
>>(Related lists -
>> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>>
&g
this case, the HTML).
I haven't had a chance to look further at the problem unfortunately.
--
Chris McDonoughZope Corporation
http://www.zope.org http://www.zope.com
"Killing hundreds of birds with thousands of stones"
_
Possibly dumb question - Are there binary distributions of v 1.1.8 of
cygwin1.dll available from cygwin.org anywhere or should I compile it
from source? I looked around for a while on there and it seems that I'd
need to use CVS to check out a 1.1.8-tagged branch and compile to get
back to tha
___
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
Maybe... it's a guess.
Anthony Baxter wrote:
>>>>Chris McDonough wrote
>>>>
>>I'd be tempted to suspect the BTrees module setstate code.
>>
>
> Yeah? This is something that you'd expect to see with it?
>
> Anthony
>
Have you read the CST documentation? Particularly the "Using Session
onStart and onEnd Events" section?
- Original Message -
From: "Godefroid Chapelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:31 AM
Subject: CoreSessionTracking
tion may not
> come up until you deal with the system problem. See your application log for
> information on the error that lead to this problem.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Zope-Dev maillist -
This is unrelated to Michael's original problem, but...
> However, I kinda find this funcitonality a bit useless since the two
> objects are not all that independent. All it allows (since you are not
> allowed yet to have two session_id_mgr) is to set different varialbes
> with different timeout
Hi mark,
Which OS, and which Zope version? I dont have an answer at all right
now, but I'd like to start collecting info. If anybody else has this
problem, can they also provide platform and Zope version?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
PU usage, swap usage, etc.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ToleratingHangsAndLeaks
... another proposal for extending Zope with a mode where it would
restart itself every so often or as it determines its in a
pathological state.
Thanks!
--
Chris McDonough
>/home/morten/zope_instances/usr2/local/Zope-bcr/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/Catalog.py,
>>line 614, in _indexedSearch
>> File
>>/home/morten/zope_instances/usr2/local/Zope-bcr/lib/python/SearchIndex/UnIndex.py,
>>line 453, in keyForDocument
>>KeyError: (see above)
>>
>>
>>Any clues?
&g
You should be able to pass the database into a thread object and
obtain a connection from it in order to manipulate the underlying
database like so:
class YourThread(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, db):
self.db = db
def run(self):
threading.Thread.run(self)
previous ones. If there is redundancy, that can be worked
>>out.
>>
>>
>>>So, if there is interest, i would propose to collect some ideas and
>>>comments about how a better Catalog should look like, how it could be
>>>
> best
>
>>>im
There are also set objects like OOSets and IISets that can be used in
intersection and union operations as documented in the BTrees module.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey P Shell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Nove
Joseph,
Sorry about not getting back sooner on this... it's been a long time.
> I haven't yet investigated the feasability of an implementation. However,
> it would be nice to have 3 out-of-the-box choices for acl_users
> folders:
>
> - the current acl_users folder
>
> - a new acl_users folde
>
>
>
> ___
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
&
> FYI
> I finally have a Cygwin compiled Zope running in a Cygwin enviroment.
> This is with the very latest Cygwin distribution augmented by a locally
> compiled Cygwin as represented by the current Cygwin CVS files.
Cool! This is excellent. This means that I stand a shot at getting rid of
200
> No I forgot to mention that this is with a locally compiled Python
> that hasn't had threading disabled.
Oh ok... when possible I will give it a roll and I'll try to document the
problems I have so we can compare notes.
Thanks!
- C
___
Zope-Dev
do this in the debugger:
import Zope
app = Zope.app()
app.fixupZClassDependencies(rebuild=1)
get_transaction().commit()
exit the debugger and restart, see what happens.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 12, 200
> Tim McLaughlin wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Chris, I'll hold on to that for a rainier day. I just worked
> > this one out in a very roundabout way ;)
> >
> > A product had gotten copied in that moved a Product class from one
> > module to another even though everything else was the same. It seems
> >
Hi Lennart,
I suggest sending your plea for bug reporting as well as the bugfixes
themselves to Ken Manheimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). He is the person responsible
for creating the replacement for the collector.
Thanks for the bugfixes!
- C
- Original Message -
From: "Lennart Regebro" <[E
Note that I was able to get Zope up and running using Cywin after:
- upgrading to the most recent snapshot Cywgin dll (cygwin1-20011016.dll),
which was as easy as copying the file over the existing 1.3.3 version of
cywin1.dll. I didn't futz with building anything Cygwin-related out of CVS.
- re
Hope it's OK to continue crossposting this thread.
> also of note
> http://apache.dev.wapme.net
Grabbed the bindist earlier today. ;-) I wanted to torture test the Zope
session manager under the cygwin-built Zope using ab, which is good
real-world threading test. It appears that neither ab nor
> One thing I haven't seen mentioned is that cygwin seems to impose
> a noticeable performance hit for an application running under it,
> compared to a "native" port.
Zope seems pretty slow under Cygwin. I can't really put a figure on it
because of the problem I'm having using "ab" against it so
> I posted a serious bug- Zope throws an exception after trying to
> resolve a transaction conflict three times. The discussion was
quickly moved
Posted to where? I see this message in neither Zope-Dev@ nor Zope@.
> line and I was told this is not a problem- Not a problem? Give me a
break!!
> T
> I posted the bug at 11/30/2001 11:17 AM...
That's less than two hours ago. I didn't get the mail nor do I see it
on Zope-dev. Is your assertion that I or someone else prevented it
from showing up on Zope-dev? Who exactly was it that told you it
wasn't a problem, and in what manner did they
There won't be any more discussion about this issue from me.
- C
- Original Message -
From: "Clark OBrien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:48 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] FW: Zope & optimistic transactions.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> The session management framework (formerly known as CoreSessionTracking, now
> it is in the core and just called Session) is another example, if my first
> look was right. The API seems to have changed a lot between the last CST and
> the final Session release that is part of 2.5 beta. O.k., the
risks to the Zope core
> development (rash action and messed up stuff happening once every while),
> in exchange for a lot more active contributors.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martijn
>
>
> ___
>
AFAIK, OOSet is a set of objects and IISet is a set of integers.
That's the simplest usage of them. Anything beyond that you'll need
to experiment.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL
heart.
Zope2 is familiar and fairly well understood.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Martijn Faassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECT
> > The other thing is that
> > the core coders at Zope Corp are the only ones that can get
around the
> > fishbowl if they so desire.
>
> Here! Here!
Not really. I couldn't, at least.
- C
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.z
- Original Message -
From: "Martijn Faassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2
This isn't a Catalog error, it's a ZODB error. It appears that your
ZODB data has beome inconsistent. You might want to try to run
fsrecover.py against it after making a backup to see if it detects any
errors.
- Original Message -
From: "Joachim Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL P
You folks should turn on "big M" logging (via -M) and see if you see a
pattern to when the system dumps core. You can use the
utilities/requestprofiler script to analyze the big M log.
- Original Message -
From: "Harald Koschinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daniel Duclos" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I am forwarding this message to ZODB-dev, as it is more appropriate
there.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Kratz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:17 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] corrupted data.fs
> Hello all,
>
> My apologies if this is not a
nt
>
>
> ___
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://li
___
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/
ow to
> handle.
>
--
Chris McDonoughZope Corporation
http://www.zope.org http://www.zope.com
"Killing hundreds of birds with thousands of stones"
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.
The broken pipe error should be caught. Patches accepted, if you've
got the time.
Thanks,
- C
- Original Message -
From: "Leonardo Rochael Almeida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "zope-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:47 AM
Subject: [Zope-dev] browser closing connec
I also had this problem at one point but could not reproduce it.
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher N. Deckard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:43 AM
Subject: [Zope-dev] zope collector is broken
> I tried submitting a new issue to the
These failure reports are alarming, but I haven't seen
anything like them, and of course we can't fix what we can't
find. If anybody can make the problem recur repeatably, we
can almost certainly fix it.
Sorry,
- C
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001 10:03:36 +0100
Dirk Datzert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Excellent analysis, many thanks Sean! This is much-needed info for
people whom are attempting to scale.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:36 PM
Subject: [Zope-dev] 100k+ objects, or...Improving Performance of
BTreeFo
801 - 900 of 1351 matches
Mail list logo
