On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>
>>> Gary Poster wrote: [snip]
>>>> I personally think these efforts do not make the potential
>>>> consens
On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Thomas Lotze, are you happy enough with this to still help with the
>> implementation?
>
> I am indeed. This isn't the ideal solution I had hoped for, but it is a
> big step in a good direction from my point of view a
Yeah, I was thinking that too, as a "I don't have time to think hard about
this" little daydream.
Actually I believe you would want to subclass InterfaceClass and make your new
zope.component.Interface an instance of the new InterfaceClass and specify
zope.interface's Interface as something i
On Jan 22, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 22:44, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> I also don't know of any applications running on the other frameworks,
>>> which is why it's so empty there.
>>
>> Schoo
On Jan 26, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> I got tired of seeing things like
>
> /home/mg/tmp/buildout-eggs/zope.testing-3.8.6-py2.5.egg/zope/testing/testrunner/debug.py:23:
> DeprecationWarning: zope.testing.doctest is deprecated in favour of the
> Python standard library doctest m
On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's this week's summary.
>
> For those of you who can't/don't participate in those meetings, there's
> the open question about how useful you consider my summaries to be.
> Please tell!
I read them and appreciate them. Thank
Hi David. I'm not sure. The person who might have a better idea is Zvezdan,
who has been cc'd.
Gary
On Mar 31, 2010, at 6:02 PM, David Glick wrote:
> Hello,
> In Aug. 2008 Juan Pablo Giménez asked [1] on this list about merging his
> work [2] on adding support for the authorize.net Automated
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 9 (25 JULY 2003)
Welcome to the ninth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter you don't
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 10 (5 SEPTEMBER 2003)
Welcome to the tenth Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter you
WELCOME TO THE ZOPE 3 NEWSLETTER: ISSUE 11 (23 DECEMBER 2003)
Welcome to the eleventh Zope 3 newsletter. Information about Zope 3
and newsletter contributions and suggestions can be found at the
bottom of this newsletter.
GLOSSARY FOR THE UNINITIATED
Encounter a term in this newsletter y
Hi Christian. What are the (possibly) pertinent elements to the changes
in your sandbox?
Gary
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope-dev mailinglist and you have been the last ones touching code
in Products/DateIndex.
This
That sounds possible. I added support of Python 2.3 datetime, and while
I tried to handle alternate timezones correctly I may have failed. I'll
try to look at this later today.
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on
Christian: I think I saw and fixed the problem, if your machine's local
time is GMT. Could you please cvs up the test and see if the issue is
resolved?
Thanks
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope
Christian Theune wrote:
... the problem ... seems fixed by the changed
test.
Yay!
So I'll mark this as "resolved" in my mental collector. Thanks for
bringing this to my attention, and sorry it caused you grief.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMA
+1
Jim Fulton wrote:
What do people think about alternative 4?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zop
Jim Fulton wrote:
Given that, I still prefer context#dc to context/##dc.
+1, also in preference to "/#" and the other options I've seen.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
SUMMARY:
The Zope.org Subversion repository now has a sandbox area for
collaboration by contributors. This area has no constraints for
checkins except those listed in the contributors agreement, and is
intended to promote experimentation and easy, quick sharing.
Details and how-to are below.
D
On May 30, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 30. Mai 2005 12:35:22 -0400 Chad Whitacre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dear all,
I am wondering what mechanism the Zope team uses to manage the
copyright/license boilerplate at the top of every file. Is this
handled
manually or i
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/
ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository
I already spoke with Philipp on IRC about this, but for the record,
and speaking pers
While I don't agree with the +1 voters, I understand and appreciate
their arguments. That said...
On Nov 23, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3
doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just
inert cod
On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Zope 2 depends on Zope 3, via Five. Zope 3 does not depend on
Zope 2.
A very good point, but one which makes me feel that Zope 2
shouldn't be merged in with Zope 3 ;-)
Actually, yes, all of my points were ma
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
What test failed here?
Go to ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
This url:
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Click on the 'log' link for the failed test. In
Zope Corp has released nine new packages as standalone Zope 3
projects on zope.org. Three are completely new to the zope.org
repository, and six were previously part of the zc Sandbox on zope.org.
These three packages are brand new to zope.org.
zc.shortcut
Our (second) take on the symboli
Hey. Thanks for your return thoughts.
- Original Message -
From: "emf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gary Poster wrote:
> > * I need the ability to store arbitrary properties for each virtual
host.
> > In particular, the correlary of my current work is to provide
s again.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Dieter Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gary Poster writes:
> > Hi. My main project right now is actually to build a VHM replacement
for
> > myself to solve some needs I had.
> > .
> > * I need
Hi all. I have a folder-like product that holds some other objects that are
not products--like the users in a user folder, their class definition is in
the same product (and file) as their parent folder. Unlike users in the
user folder, my subobjects actually have use a tabbed Zope UI themselves
Hi all. The Virtual Host Folder I released currently has a lot of the
features you want, and is getting a number of other ones. I think it is
worth a look, but then, that's just me. It replaces the VHM. I need to
specify the interface, such as it is, but ...
1) The currently released one is ve
Hi everyone.
OK. I'm stumped. I'm doing funky tricks here to create an alias
functionality somewhat similar to a transparent folder. In the belief that
brevity begets more possibility for answers, I won't tell you more, but just
get straight to the chase:
Zope 2.5, CMF 1.2 (but I'm using the
Hey Chris. Thanks for the response.
From: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maybe silly questions, but: Do you call InitializeGlobals() on ObjectX's
> class (usually at the end of the module where it's defined)?
Hmm. No...do you mean Globals.InitializeClass? I do that.
> Does ObjectX
If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for
inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder 0.5.1,
and needs just a bit more spiffing.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Lennart Regebro
Sent:
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gary Poster wrote:
> >
> > If there is any interest in spiffing the Virtual Host Folder up for
> > inclusion in Zope 2.6, I'll do the work. It requires Ordered Folder
0.5.1,
> > and needs just a bit more
If the VirtualHostFolder is included, that will mean OrderedFolder is also
incorporated in 2.6. I think OrderedFolder should be added as its own item
to the proposed features list for individual consideration.
Then the question of "Resources" arises.
That is Stephan's product, not mine, and it
From: "Joachim Werner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi!
>
> What kind of problems does OrderedFolder have? There is no OS-specific
code
> AFAIK. It is possible that there are browser-specific issues in the
> frontend. But those would be easy to fix ...
Hi :-)
In certain circumstances, if you install
From: "Stephan Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If OF will make it in the core, the ZBabel stuff will be taken out of it
in
> anyway, since no part of Zope has something like that in it. I am also
> tempted to say that only the ordering module should go in (maybe the limit
> as well), since other fu
From: "Max M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am just pretty unshure about this approach though, so I am fishing for
> anything like it. The closest thing I have found was in the "Transparent
> Folder" product.
The Alias element of my Virtual Host Folder does something similar as well.
I can tell you th
Hi.
1) If the projects for which I have volunteered are accepted as a goal for
Zope 2.6 then I have some work cut out for me, and I'd like to try to
schedule the necessary time intelligently and early. Any ideas on when the
"grocery list" will be evaluated?
2) If we had a brief Zope 2.6 style g
Does OrderedFolder do what you want? See
http://demo.iuveno-net.de/iuveno/Products/OrderedFolder (item 3 in the list
of features). It may or may not be a standard folder feature in 2.6 as
well.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
In my own casual experimentation, Zope worked okay by itself on Mandrake
Linux 8.2b4 with Python 2.2, but ZEO refused to work.
For what it's worth.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>
> > Are you planning to up the python version
I almost 100% agree with Casey--and hallelujah for him writing it, because
that means I don't have to. ;-)
I agree that
we ought to trash frames
we ought to use strict xhtml 1.0
we ought to rely on CSS for all graphic elements
(correlative) we ought to not use *any* shims or non-logical
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 03:44 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> > > ...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
> > > some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
> > > and get to a final "plan". I didn't get much (any?) response :(
By the way, Brian, if I can with the remaining
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:04, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> There are a few products on zope.org for integrating with CVS. Look
> through the downloadable products. I think there are CVSFolder and
> ZCVSFile (or something like that), maybe more.
>
> However, most version control tools are difficult
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 22:13, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2002, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> > Hi Shane. I've been thinking about Zope versioning, and I also did a
> > bit of list searches for past discussions on this general topic. One
> > problem that seems pertin
I agree with Chris: *wow*!
[re the original explanation]
...
> I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
> parts.
Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to
convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record sequences escaped me
a bit. Thi
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some
nice use cases for this.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
ye?
Phil
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:08:41 -0500, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of
some nice use cases for this.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.
I would be very interested in taking a look. :-)
Too bad the jabber library you used is unmaintained.
Thanks
Gary
cguardia wrote:
I have used Zope+Jabber in the past, with an old version of a jabber library that seems to be unmaintained as of now. I copied the library code into a python product
Interesting. Thanks.
Interesting also that they are no longer (or not yet?) listing it on
their products page.
Gary
Alastair Burt wrote:
Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2003-03-31):
Is anyone working on Jabber integration with Zope? I can think of some
nice use cases for this
The certification is in preparation and there will be a workshop in
July where the first documents are drafted together with the TUEV and
our people, who include Aroldo Souza-Leite, Steve Alexander, some
other people and me. If you want to know more about the certification
please see http:
On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Julien Anguenot wrote:
Hi there,
I worked on a Zope-2.9 branch of off the CVS HEAD for zasync this
week.
It over there:
http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/browser/vendor/zasync/branches/z29-nux/
awesome!
The customer is currently testing out an application using
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make
people not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope-dev.
Okay, who act
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Of the two, this seems more believable. It also may be the best we
can do. However, I still don't like it. :-)
- Zope 5 will be the application server generally known as
Zope. It
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Benji York wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, my proposal would be to tone down the vision to what we have
already: a co-evolving Zope 3 and Zope 2, with Zope 2 following
and Zope 3 leading (or Zope 2 driving Zope 3 forward, however you
want to see it). No rena
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Are you kidding?
No, I'm not kidding.
+1 to what Martijn said in this email (not quoting the whole thing to
save precious bandwith).
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.
On Sep 8, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Grig Gheorghiu wrote:
Just thought I'd bring this to your attention:
http://agiletesting.blogspot.com/2006/09/pay-attention-to-new-with-
keyword.html
This is fixed in the 3.3 branch and the trunk. However, I don't know
of a distribution with the changes.
Gar
On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Wondering if someone could tell me the difference between an OOSet
and an OOTreeSet?
They seem to have different interfaces and yet seem to be used in
similar circumstances in PluginIndexes/common/UnIndex.py...
I'm looking for a
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi Gary,
Gary Poster wrote:
What should I be using?
TreeSet.
Interesting, okay, so how should I work around this bogosity?
Is this a bug?
>>> from BTrees.OOBTree import OOTreeSet,OOSet
>>> for i in OOSet((1,2,3)): p
On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
TypeError: argument to reversed() must be a sequence
The fact that this works for the OOSet is an implementation accident.
As discussed elsewhere in t
On Mar 2, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Okay, so I want a persistent, ordered sequence which is quick to
find items in and which doesn't re-store the whole sequence when
an item is inserted or removed.
What should I be using?
Ordered, as in sorted
On Jan 16, 2008, at 3:19 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
- can these proxies be used to keep track of a traversal path in
much the same way (although no seperate containment and context
chains needed) as the old Zope 2 acquisition wrappers did?
We generally assign
These changes sound great.
I just looked for your checkins in the checkins list. I didn't find
them. If I recall correctly, this usually happens if the committer is
not subscribed to the list and has not been blessed by an admin to let
the messages through anyway.
So, if I'm right, it w
I did a five-minute skim of the checkin but hope to look a bit more
tomorrow. Hopefully Marius, Benji, Albertas, or someone else who has
actually done work on this package will take a look and chime in.
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer durations
and intervals ex
On Mar 10, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
[...]
Doctest/unittest holy war: bah. I've heard the arguments, I don't see
either side as perfect, and I've made my choice. I'm very fine with
others having different opinions and choices.
On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Matthew Grant wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 20:54 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
I did have one somewhat trivial thought. I generally prefer
durations
and intervals expressed as datetime.timedeltas myself, because they
convey their meaning without having to
On Apr 3, 2008, at 7:09 PM, Malthe Borch wrote:
On 04/04/2008, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
zope.security uses RestrictedPython, iirc...
For untrusted python, yes –– but is anyone using this (in Zope 3)?
Yup.
Gary
___
Zope-Dev mailli
Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link from
this page to the failure output (to address "works for me" issues, as
well as for a quick triage).
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/l
On Jun 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Gary Poster wrote:
Hey Christian. Thanks for this. It would be nice to have a link
from this page to the failure output (to address "works for me"
issues, as well as for a quick triage).
...but I found 'em by digging around on the site, so, m
On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've watched my buildbot send out notifications for a while and
pondered how
to make them available to more people.
We really need something like this. Thanks.
A sug
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a
level
to run the tests at. Then buildbot could run all tests at level X
and
below and you could put the tr
Hi Juan.
Certainly we'd hate to see an unnecessary fork.
Are you a Zope Contributor?
I don't keep up with all the preferred mechanisms for external
contributors, so we'll ask around if not.
You'll have to make some license assignments (to Zope Foundation and
contributors, I believe) and a
Sorry Juan; been busy, Jim's been unavailable, and I'm out of the
office today. I intend to get back to you next week.
Gary
On Aug 8, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Juan Pablo Gimenez wrote:
El lun, 04-08-2008 a las 19:31 -0400, Gary Poster escribió:
Hi Juan.
Certainly we'd hate to see
If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or http://download.zope.org/simple
indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest),
you will get a 404 error.
Looking at PyPI and the zope.org index, it is evident why.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.app.authentication/3.4.3 on
On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:32 PM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
> Gary Poster a écrit :
>> If you use the http://download.zope.org/ppix or
>> http://download.zope.org/simple
>> indexes and try to get zope.app.authentication 3.4.3 (the newest),
>> you will get a 404 error
On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Benji York wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> lotze.de> wrote:
>> The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the
>> current implementation is inefficient for large collections because
>> it
>> uses a Per
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>
> [zc.blist]
>> To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.
>
> As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this
Great! Thank you!
> unless
> th
On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
> wrote:
>> Thanks Tres and Sidnei,
>>
>> My questions were intended to go to the list anyway.
>>
>> Can we take a branch from the launchpad mirror and bind it back
>> directly at
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
>&g
On Apr 16, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
...
>> So, with that in mind I today went on to zc.buildout, trying to port
>> it to Python 3 by ripping out any usage of zope.testing. Also, the
>> standard development
On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
> I propose the following adjustment:
>
> try:
> container = context.__parent__
> except AttributeError:
> container = ILocation(context).__parent__
+1
Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Jul 22, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:38, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> Am I doing something wrong? I have a dedicated python 2.6, and run
>> python2.6 dev.py and then bin/test.
>
> I looked through the tests again, and some of the tests are clearly an
> e
On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> zc.recipe.egg 1.3.0 fails badly with
>
> While:
> Installing supervisor.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/Users/ajung/sandboxes/occ/eggs/zc.buildout-1.5.0-py2.6.egg/zc/buildout/buildout.py",
> line 1784, in main
>getattr(bu
On Aug 23, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>> zc.recipe.egg 1.3.0 fails badly with
>>
>> While:
>> Installing supervisor.
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/Us
On Aug 23, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
>>
>> On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>>
>>> zc.recipe.egg 1.3.0 fails badly with
>>>
>>> While:
>>> Install
On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gary Poster wrote:
>
>> 1.3.1 has change and is released.
>>
>
> On it's failing in a different way:
>
> An internal error occurred due to
On Aug 23, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Gary Poster wrote:
>>
>>> 1.3.1 has change and is released.
>>>
>
On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a test section in buildout (version 1.5.2) which uses the environment
> option to get os.environ configs into the test script.
> But the environment configuration does not show up in the generated script.
>
> The recipe I use
101 - 185 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
