users  

Messages by Date

• 2014/04/25 Re: Compile 3.2.0 fails on CentOS 6.5 Sebastiano Pilla
• 2014/04/25 Re: Compile 3.2.0 fails on CentOS 6.5 Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/04/25 Compile 3.2.0 fails on CentOS 6.5 Sebastiano Pilla
• 2014/04/21 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Maximilian Mehnert
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Axel Rau
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Mark Felder
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/04/16 Re: configuration of forward secrecy possible? Mark Felder
• 2014/04/16 configuration of forward secrecy possible? maximilian . mehnert
• 2014/04/04 Re: Weird activity log in Thunderbird Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/04/03 Re: Weird activity log in Thunderbird Benjamin Yates
• 2014/03/30 Weird activity log in Thunderbird james
• 2014/03/28 Re: plaintext passwords in the database Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/28 Re: plaintext passwords in the database Axel Rau
• 2014/03/27 Re: plaintext passwords in the database Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/24 Re: plaintext passwords in the database Axel Rau
• 2014/03/21 Re: auto-expunge feature? Mark Felder
• 2014/03/21 Re: auto-expunge feature? Axel Rau
• 2014/03/21 Re: auto-expunge feature? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/21 auto-expunge feature? Mark Felder
• 2014/03/20 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/20 Re: Upgrading to 3.2.0 on Apple OS X Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/19 Re: Upgrading to 3.2.0 on Apple OS X Paul Préfontaine
• 2014/03/18 Re: Upgrading to 3.2.0 on Apple OS X Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/18 Re: Upgrading to 3.2.0 on Apple OS X Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/17 Re: plaintext passwords in the database Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/17 plaintext passwords in the database Mark Felder
• 2014/03/14 Re: [Diverted: post from non-subscriber] Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2014/03/14 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? feld
• 2014/03/14 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? Marc dirix
• 2014/03/14 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/14 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? Marc dirix
• 2014/03/14 Re: wrong "To"; whose fault? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/14 wrong "To"; whose fault? feld
• 2014/03/12 OpenSMTPD config example Mark felder
• 2014/03/11 Re: 3.2.0 After 10 days uptime: STARTTLS problem on submission port Lee Garrett
• 2014/03/11 Re: 3.2.0 After 10 days uptime: STARTTLS problem on submission port Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/11 3.2.0 After 10 days uptime: STARTTLS problem on submission port Axel Rau
• 2014/03/11 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/11 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Axel Rau
• 2014/03/11 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/03/10 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/09 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Mark Felder
• 2014/03/09 Re: aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Mark Felder
• 2014/03/09 aox 3.2.0 clean install woes Mark Felder
• 2014/03/06 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2014/03/05 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/05 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/03/05 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Mark Felder
• 2014/03/05 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Axel Rau
• 2014/03/05 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Mark Felder
• 2014/03/01 Re: a search question Martin Rode
• 2014/03/01 Re: a search question Marc dirix
• 2014/03/01 a search question Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/25 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup james
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup james
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/23 Re: aox vacuum overhaul, splitup james
• 2014/02/22 aox vacuum overhaul, splitup Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/22 Re: Memory leak(s)? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/22 Re: Memory leak(s)? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/22 Re: Memory leak(s)? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/22 Memory leak(s)? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/17 Tag it! (Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/17 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Mark Felder
• 2014/02/17 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/02/16 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Mark Felder
• 2014/02/14 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Mark Felder
• 2014/02/07 Re: Troubles with delete Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/02/06 Troubles with delete james
• 2014/01/28 Re: Shared mailboxes / folder performance Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/01/28 Re: Shared mailboxes / folder performance Sebastian Schlatow
• 2014/01/28 Re: Shared mailboxes / folder performance Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/28 Shared mailboxes / folder performance Sebastian Schlatow
• 2014/01/28 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/28 IMAP extensions support for ANNOTATEMORE, METADATA and ANNOTATE Sebastian Schlatow
• 2014/01/28 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/01/28 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/28 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/01/28 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/27 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2014/01/27 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/22 Re: 3.2.0 ready to roll Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2014/01/15 3.2.0 ready to roll Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/12/09 Re: oid of citext too late Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/12/09 Re: oid of citext too late Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/12/09 Re: oid of citext too late Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/12/09 Re: oid of citext too late Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/12/09 Re: Unexpected warning? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/12/09 Re: oid of citext too late Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/12/07 Unexpected warning? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/12/06 oid of citext too late Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/26 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/26 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2013/11/26 IMAP THREAD command Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/24 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/24 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Axel Rau
• 2013/11/22 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? james
• 2013/11/22 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/22 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/22 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/22 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Usman Malik
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Lee Garrett
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Marc dirix
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: Special folders Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/11/21 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/11/20 Re: web mail for masses - scaling archiveopteryx - active development? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2013/10/11 Re: aox 3.2 and the list fubar Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/10/10 Re: aox 3.2 and the list fubar sean dreilinger
• 2013/10/10 Re: test Mark Felder
• 2013/10/10 aox 3.2 and the list fubar Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/10/10 Re: [Diverted: post from non-subscriber] Flushing queue with 5.x.y error / status failed Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2013/10/10 [Diverted: post from non-subscriber] Flushing queue with 5.x.y error / status failed Axel Rau
• 2013/10/10 test Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2013/08/30 aox ssl ciphers Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/30 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/30 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Martin Rode
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: THREAD before 3.1.4? Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: THREAD before 3.1.4? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Axel Rau
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 THREAD before 3.1.4? Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: issues with git head Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: issues with git head Axel Rau
• 2013/08/29 Re: aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Axel Rau
• 2013/08/29 aox views are too flexible to be usable — I think Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: issues with git head Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/29 Re: issues with git head Mark Felder
• 2013/08/29 Re: issues with git head Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/08/28 Re: issues with git head Mark Felder
• 2013/08/17 Re: New version ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/05/23 Re: "pthread problem"? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/05/23 "pthread problem"? Jim Rowan
• 2013/03/18 Re: 3.1.3 views Vegard Vesterheim
• 2013/03/13 Re: 3.1.3 views Vegard Vesterheim
• 2013/01/28 Re: Special folders Mark Felder
• 2013/01/27 Re: Special folders Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/26 Re: Special folders Mark Felder
• 2013/01/21 Re: Weird fail when restoring a backup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/21 Re: Weird fail when restoring a backup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/20 Re: Weird fail when restoring a backup james
• 2013/01/20 Re: Weird fail when restoring a backup Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/20 Re: process or threads Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/19 Weird fail when restoring a backup james
• 2013/01/19 Re: weird Message-Id issue Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/19 Re: weird Message-Id issue Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/19 Re: weird Message-Id issue Mark Felder
• 2013/01/19 Re: weird Message-Id issue Axel Rau
• 2013/01/18 weird Message-Id issue Mark Felder
• 2013/01/18 Re: process or threads Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 2013/01/18 Re: process or threads Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/17 Re: process or threads Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 2013/01/17 Re: huh jg
• 2013/01/17 Re: huh Mark Felder
• 2013/01/17 Re: huh Axel Rau
• 2013/01/17 Re: huh Mark Felder
• 2013/01/17 Re: huh Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/17 Re: process or threads Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/11 Re: huh jg
• 2013/01/11 Re: issues with git head Mark Felder
• 2013/01/11 Re: Commit 8 january Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/11 Re: Commit 8 january jg
• 2013/01/11 Re: Commit 8 january Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/10 Re: Commit 8 january Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 2013/01/07 issues with git head Mark Felder
• 2013/01/01 Re: IMAP quota Performance Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2013/01/01 Re: LMTP stuck? Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2012/12/31 Re: LMTP stuck? Mark Felder
• 2012/12/31 Re: LMTP stuck? Arnt Gulbrandsen

• Earlier messages
• Later messages