Eugene and all,
Are you proposing this scheme for admin_levels?
(first row is Eugene's proposal as I understand it)
2 -- 2 - National Border (this is a worldwide convention, so there will be no
3 -- 4 - Regions
4 -- 6 - Provinces
5 -- Districts?
6 -- 8 - Cities and municipalities
8 -- 9 -
Hi maning,
Actually, I mentioned in my e-mail that I have specifically excluded
congressional districts[1] from the discussion since these do not specify
administrative boundaries. Aside from the pork barrel, the representatives
don't *administer* their territories. I think these should be tagged
I'm good with May 16.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I've posted the tagaytay mapping party announcement to several people,
mailinglist and my blog.
Please help in populating more information in the tagaytay mapping
party page to help
Hi,
I will try my best to clear my schedules on the morning of May 16 so I can
at least meet with you guys in person. Might not be able to map much as I
will be on my way to Batangas by noon. Where is our meeting place?
thanks
ed
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:53 PM, maning sambale
Alright, sige lets post an announcement (blogs, OSM diary,
mailinglist, yahoogroups).
On 4/30/09, Nacario Neil nbnaca...@yahoo.com wrote:
good to go
- Original Message
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009
good to go
- Original Message
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Reviving plan(s) for Tagaytay Mapping party
Last call for confirming the date:
May 16 in Tagaytay
Is the
I suggest somewhere here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=14.102332lon=120.951185zoom=18layers=B000FTF
We can choose among the restaurants there for the meeting place (one
where there's beer and free wifi).
Is it too crowded during weekends?
@ ed: I posted the mapping party announcement in
Hi Marloue,
Slightly off-topic question. Since you're from Davao City, are residents of
the city adamant about insisting that Davao City is separate from Davao del
Sur? *Some* people from Zamboanga City are positively vocal (and sometimes
actually hostile!) whenever people say they are part of
Hi maning,
For your second question, well Ian and I are already converting and
implementing the borders in Metro Manila as relations (though the
admin_levels are still not finalized).
For example, see this relation for Brgy. Urdaneta in Makati:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/103686
Or
Nice! I better start adding marikina boundaries then (well until we
agree on the proposal)
cheers,
maning
still at work! midway to finishing the image processing.
For example, see this relation for Brgy. Urdaneta in Makati:
http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/103686
Or this relation
I created a separate thread for this to give focus to the original
topic.
What I said is actually true, in March 1, 1937 (but Araw ng Dabaw is in
March 16) Davao City is inaugurated by President Manuel L. Quezon as a
chartered city by then Davao City is separated from Davao del Sur.
Unlike Davao
I guess the DPWH is the agency that should know about these things?
I'm not actually familiar with the Manila East,South,North road system. I'm
just familiar (somewhat) with the Radial and Circumferential Road system of
Metro Manila.
As a bit of trivia, did you know that Republic Act No. 8224 (
Eugene / seav,
Yes, the southern part of Davao City and the northern part of Davao del
Sur is the boundary in the province of Sta. Cruz. If you notice here
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=6.9742lon=125.3851zoom=12layers=B000FTF
there is no boundary between Sta. Cruz and Davao City yet, I am looking
This is interesting. Maybe we should compile these road (renaming) updates
to get everybody informed (or at least understand the actions of MMDA as
they don't tend to explain why they rename all those street signs). Does it
mean that Katipunan Ave E.Rodriguez Ave (pasig) no longer exist? Are
Well, you can actually see the MMDA signs side by side with Quezon City and
Pasig City signs with conflicting names.
In my experience, people will use whatever damned name they choose. So
Katipunan Ave. will still be Katipunan Ave. no matter what the lawmakers
say. And the LRT-1 station is still
At the risk of reopening earlier very lengthy discussions - this suggestion
seems to me to be an unnecessary misuse of the tag highway=cycleway which
has an accepted and fairly well agreed meaning. It also seems to be a prima
facie case of tagging for the renderers! Surely it is the rendering that
2009/4/30 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
At the risk of reopening earlier very lengthy discussions - this suggestion
seems to me to be an unnecessary misuse of the tag highway=cycleway which
has an accepted and fairly well agreed meaning. It also seems to be a prima
facie case of tagging
On Wednesday 29 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
I'm looking for a way to map restrictions for a zone. This
includes things like maxspeed, maxweight and parking restriction.
I want to avoid having to place those tags on all the roads inside
the zone, specially for
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
For example in our local park bikes can go on all the paths, but there
are some specific divided cycle paths too. (We
Risk?!
Misuse how?
Dave
My idea:
highway=cycleway OR (highway=footway,bicycle=permissive) don't care which
(so will be picked up by bike-orientated maps)
*and*
foot=designated
designation=public_footpath
so that foot orientated renderers like Freemap will pick it up as a public
right of
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:36:43AM +0100, James Stewart wrote:
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
Sure.
For example in our local park bikes can go on
Jacek Konieczny schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:36:43AM +0100, James Stewart wrote:
There are lots of paths that are primarily footpaths, but bikes can go
on them. I think that cycleway is best kept for paths that are
designed and designated for bicycles.
Sure.
For
According to http://maps.cloudmade.com/ it is not possible to drive by car
from Stensättaregatan (58.41685269735186 15.595479011535645) to
Skräddaregatan (58.41647059846362 15.597131252288818). Is there some
problem in the tagging of the streets or is it because the routing is a
little too good at
The new text is available at
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ and includes diff
versions so that you can see clearly what changes are made.
A summary of changes and the Open Data Commons comment process lasting
up until May 6th is described here:
Moved to Talk.
Jochen Topf wrote
Sent: 30 April 2009 8:41 AM
To: d...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
The discussion on using Cloudmade routing on the OSM website points to a
deeper question: What is the OpenStreetMap project and how do we want
to present it on
Etienne Chové a écrit :
Dears,
I wrote a python class to communicate with OSM API (read, write,
update). For interested users, informations are here [1].
May I put sources on the dev server ?
Here it is :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/src/modules/OsmApi.py
--
Etienne
It comes down to what you think is meant by highway=cycleway. If you think
that it means a cycle superhighway, then obviously you don't want to apply
that to a shared-with-pedestrians route. But cycle superhighways are pretty
rare, and highway=cycleway is used much more widely than that. I've come
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Greg Troxel
and you define the relation to
say that all ways in some area of some type should be in the relation.
You try to use relations to define a category but :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
Pieren
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Mario Salvini wrote:
If such paths are designated for foot ans bicyle as well, why don't you
tag them both as designated?
highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated ( or footway
+bicycle=designated or cycleway+foot=desiganted)
I do that, when
I feel like there's something slightly missing. Perhaps needs a mention of
ever-more-accurate data, with the implication that it remains permanently
and very-intentionally open to improvement by new people who see details
that have been missed.
I don't see OSM as providing data, more providing a
Richard Mann wrote:
... I've come to the view that cycleway should be used
if someone's gone to the trouble to make it good enough to cycle on, and
nobody's obviously objecting.
I'd agree with that. As a non-cyclist I don't feel somehow
discriminated against because somewhere that I walk
Hi Jochen Andy,
There is however a danger in leaving interpretation of the data solely to
closed source projects (e.g. Cloudmade) : Because there is no agreement in
the community on the exact meaning of many of our tags, it is possible that
people may tag for the closed source project. Even
I'll focus on the coexistence vs. zone-only aspect, because most of the
other problems can indeed be solved or mitigated by choosing a decent
zone representation and throwing in some editor support and documentation.
Ben Laenen wrote:
- zonal mapping makes it more difficult to write software
Man! This should be a featured image:
http://toposm.com/ma/?zoom=15lat=42.26621lon=-71.02104layers=B000
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog:
On Thursday 30 April 2009, you wrote:
So you assume that well-designed, liberally licensed (!= GPL) Open
Source libraries will exist for all major programming languages and
platforms soon? Well, until then, I'll continue to assume that the
goal of OSM data being used in creative and unexpected
Hi everyone
in my opinion OSM should not try to compete with mapping websites by
offering more and more tools for using maps. This is because I think
such an endeavour would have three problems: First, how to decide
which of the hundreds of tools out there are integrated on the OSM
website and
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map layer,
especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used (for raw paths as
you describe them). The dark grey dashed lines in Mapnik seem a good
starting point.
If path was rendered then the problem kinda goes away - use
Christoph Böhme wrote:
Hi everyone
in my opinion OSM should not try to compete with mapping websites by
offering more and more tools for using maps. This is because I think
such an endeavour would have three problems: First, how to decide
which of the hundreds of tools out there are
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map layer,
especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used
Every time it gets discussed, it becomes *less* clear how it's being
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different website
altogether.
I disagree. OSM doesn't need a faked-up website to show what can be
done. There's plenty of real places using the data for real
full ack
some tags are too confusing ...
on a lighter note: from tagwatch
typo or protest against a very_horrible tag ;-)
smoothmess horrible (4), impassable (1)
On 30 Apr 2009, at 8:59 , Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
On Thursday 30 April 2009, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'd support that highway=path needs to be rendered in the cycle map
layer, especially now it's becoming clearer how it's being used
Every time it gets
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Paul Johnson a scris:
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Renaud MICHEL schrieb:
I didn't find an answer in the wiki, how should I tag roads that
are one way for motorized vehicles but two way for bicycle?
The documented and established way to
2009/4/30, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
Every time it gets discussed, it becomes *less* clear how it's being
used to me. And I'm mightily concerned that the 10 people discussing
it on these lists might be in no way representative of the 14,990
people who are mapping paths and aren't
Hi,
Alan Wright wrote:
I'm not only thinking of the standard slippy-map, but contour layers,
routing, poi's, etc, etc.
Contrary to what some people make you believe, OSM does not have contour
layers or elevation data. There's much talk about a possible sister
project (open elevation map?
Ouch, that's bad.
i thought they'd contain some actual data, size implied that.
I wonder if anybody knows a way to render the 16 German federal states
(Bundesländer)? Actually that's what i want to do in the end..
Is there a way to find out what is in a Shapefile? Like that i can write
Hi,
Torsten Mohr wrote:
Is there a way to find out what is in a Shapefile?
Use a GIS program like QGIS to open and display the shapefile and you
can see what's there!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
Fully agree - and this seems to be in the spirit of most current practice
...
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: James Stewart [mailto:j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk]
Sent: 30 April 2009 11:37
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of footways with bicycle=yes
There are
Mario - perhaps inadvertently, but importantly - raises a separate issue for
those of us who like the tag designation= . This tag is afaik a more recent
introduction than designated= . Although the intention was much the same in
each case the wiki descriptions are subtly different. My personal
... Part way with James but recognising Jacek's point it would need adding
bicycle=permissive or bicycle=yes as appropriate so that the cycle renderers
pick up. Where appropriate (e.g. often in the UK) the use of
designation=public_footpath (meaning that the default is bicycle=no unless
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 April 2009 17:00
To: Richard Mann
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of footways with bicycle=yes
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Richard Mann
I could more or less go with this too - but perhaps only if we could adopt
more widely the use of designation= (or designated= - see earlier post!) to
allow the definition of legal status (mostly in the UK admittedly) for those
of us who are public rights of way workers. Is there a case for adding
... Hmm! Interesting alternative approach ... Not sure what I think ...
Worth discussing ... By now everyone who cares knows that I like the
designation= tag as it solves a lot of problems for me but that is equally
compatible with Ben's approach as with any other.
Mike Harris
-Original
I'm one of the people mapping paths (since March) who scans this list,
and I have to say that I'm confused. Although part of that may be
because I'm new to OSM and not just to the matter of how to deal with
tagging and rendering things. And part of that may because a lot of the
tagging conventions
Hi all,
Andy has sorted out a venue for the Sunderland Mapping Party this weekend.
It's a couple of miles North on the seafront of Seaburn.
Saturday 2nd Sunday 4th May
Approx. 10am to 5pm each day
Marriott Hotel, Queens Parade, Sunderland, SR6 8DB Phone: 44 191 5292041.
Map
Hello, Torsten. I think the 16 german federal states (lander) are available as
a shapefile in lots of different places. Here is one example:
http://wetnet.net/~we7u/xastir/maps/shapefile/Germany/
That is a shapefile (compressed) with 16 polygons, and you also have the
population and
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different website
altogether.
I disagree. OSM doesn't need a faked-up website to show what can be
done. There's plenty of real places using the data for
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_image_proposals#TopOSM
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:27 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Man! This should be a featured image:
http://toposm.com/ma/?zoom=15lat=42.26621lon=-71.02104layers=B000
Alan Wright wrote:
Sent: 30 April 2009 9:43 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] What is OSM and what isn't?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alan Wright
alanwright.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think OpenStreetMap needs a shop window - perhaps a different
website
Just a small correction to Gregory's note, Sunday is of course May 3rd.
Hope to see some of you on Sat or Sun.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Gregory
Sent: 30 April 2009 7:56 PM
To: Talk
Richard Mann wrote:
Why not tag it as a cycleway? Then it will display as a cycleway. How is
it different from anything else that might be tagged as a cycleway?
At least when I'm trying to decide, I ask two questions: 1) Does it
allow bicycles, and 2) Is it wide enough for two cyclists going
Richard Mann wrote:
It comes down to what you think is meant by highway=cycleway. If you
think that it means a cycle superhighway, then obviously you don't want
to apply that to a shared-with-pedestrians route.
Depends on jurisdiction, of course. One problem OSM has with handling
Oregon and
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Mario Salvini wrote:
If such paths are designated for foot ans bicyle as well, why don't you
tag them both as designated?
highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated ( or footway
+bicycle=designated or
Proposal page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/surface_unification
Proposal discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/surface_unification
Please read the talk-page before commenting on this!
Introduction:
This proposal should improve the current
MapOf [1], which is called from the export tab on the main map page,
currently only produces an error instead of nice, big Osmarender maps.
Stefan
[1] http://tah.openstreetmap.org/MapOf/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Colin Marquardt wrote:
2009/4/30 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Stephan Plepelits wrote:
In my opionion we should produce a page with featured applications,
with a link from the mainpage (before Help Wiki i would propose).
Last year
Lennard schreef:
YRS wrote:
Weet iemand waarom Mapnik ons dorpcentrum ineens laat onderlopen? Het is
door een soort eiland doordat de omsluitenden vaarten op elkaar uit
Het is waarschijnlijk een van de verschijnselen van het proces van snel
updaten van de kaart. Een van de
While this may not change to much in AU for OSM, it's still an interesting ruling - particuarly the possible future review of the Telstra v Desktop Marketing decision.
IceTV won their appeal against Channel 9 over the reuse of 9's TV guide.
Hallo Allerseits,
bin neu hier und lese jetzt erst ein paar Tage mit.
Mario Salvini schrieb, am 29.04.2009 2:55 Uhr:
[...]
außerdem gibts in Zone-30 Bereichen eigentlich keine extra ausgeführten
benutzungspflichtigen Radwege ;)
Das stimmt so in keinem Fall pauschal. In HH gibt eine
Guenther Meyer schrieb, am 29.04.2009 0:00 Uhr:
Am Dienstag 28 April 2009 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
was spricht dagegen, das gleich entsprechend mit z.B. maxspeed=50 oder
maxspeed=100 zu taggen?
wozu ein zusaetzlicher key?
Der punkt ist das ein maxspeed=100 auf der Landstraße von einem
Keine
Am Donnerstag, 30. April 2009 01:12:17 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Aus der Frage was ist mit der internationalen Gueltigkeit besonders in
Laendern ohne Datenbank-Direktive haben sich die ODC-Leute etwas
herausgewunden, siehe http://www.opendatacommons.org/faq/licenses/ - das
Argument geht etwa
Garry schrieb:
Was bitte spricht dagegen,*eine* Fahrbahn [1] auch als *einen* way zu
mappen, wie es bei Openstreetmap schon seit Ewigkeiten üblich ist?
Es ist bei OSM genauso auch schon seit Ewigkeiten üblich
Autobahnaufahrten getrennt zu erfassen!
Und das kommt doch genau daher, weil sich
Moin,
hab vor kurzen eine Interview für Zeit Online gegeben.
Ihr findet es unter:
http://www.zeit.de/online/2009/18/openstreetmap-anders
Hoffe ich hab nicht zuviel blödsinn erzählt.
Insbesondere ist das mit dem Fossgis nicht ganz so rübergekommen wie ich es
mir gewünscht (= Der Fossgis ist
Am 30.04.09 schrieb Garry garr...@gmx.de:
Darin dass man dafür sorge tragen muss dass nicht gleich wieder am
Berührungspunkt von der Auffahrt auf die Einfahrt
geroutet werden kann, die optische Kontrolle ist aufwendiger, in den
Anwendungen muss mehr Aufwand getrieben
werden für eine
Tobias Wendorff wrote:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Wenn sich jemand fuer das Thema besonders interessiert, lohnt sich
sicher auch die Anreise von etwas weiter weg - ggf. helfen wir gern bei
der Vermittlung einer Uebernachtungsmoeglichkeit.
Wäre eventuell auch ein LiveStream mit Webcam und Chat
Hallo!
Die Wanderkarte ist vorübergehend offline. Wird wohl ein paar Tage
dauern bis sie auf ein neues Webhosting umgezogen ist.
bye
Nop
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Martin Simon schrieb:
Keine Anwendung sollte derart scharfes Abbiegen von motorway_link auf
motorway_link erlauben - allein schon um fehlerhafte Daten abzufangen.
Die hellsehende Anwendung als Lösung aller Probleme, prima. Einfacher
wäre es vielleicht, das existierende Abbiegeverbot auch
Hallo,
Sven Anders wrote:
Ist denn z.B. die GPL in allen Teilen der Welt verbindlich?
Vermutlich nicht. Aber die GPL hat (soweit ich weiss) uns gegenueber den
Vorteil, dass sie in grossen Teilen der Welt auf Copyright gestuetzt
sein kann.
Wenn jemand in Nordkorea die GPL verletzt und ein
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 schrieb Mario Salvini:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 schrieb André Reichelt:
Stefan Dettenhofer (StefanDausR) schrieb:
maxspeed=motorway:DE
Ist die angabe des Straßentypes denn
SteMo schrieb:
Hallo Allerseits,
bin neu hier und lese jetzt erst ein paar Tage mit.
Mario Salvini schrieb, am 29.04.2009 2:55 Uhr:
[...]
außerdem gibts in Zone-30 Bereichen eigentlich keine extra ausgeführten
benutzungspflichtigen Radwege ;)
Das stimmt so in keinem
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Sind die gelben Autobahnen nicht auch klar/eindeutig über
highway=trunk + motorroad=yes zu erkennen? Könnte man auch als
eindeutiges Kriterium deklarieren.
Überall da wo highway=motorway ODER highway=trunk + motorroad=yes
UND kein maxspeed-Tag gilt --
Gary68 wrote:
aber: trotz des letzten rekords ein neuer höchststand bei den offenen
bugs...
Wobei anzumerken wäre dass es sich bei einem großen Teil davon gar nicht
um bugs im eigentlichen Sinne handelt. Hier in meiner Gegend handelt es
sich oft nur um Kommentare ala hier wird Ende 2009
Hallo!
Am 30. April 2009 01:12 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Aus der Frage was ist mit der internationalen Gueltigkeit besonders in
Laendern ohne Datenbank-Direktive haben sich die ODC-Leute etwas
herausgewunden, siehe http://www.opendatacommons.org/faq/licenses/ - das
Argument
So verkommt der maxspeed - tag zur Bedeutungslosigkeit weil jeder was
neues dazu erfindet und die Anwendungen gar nicht so schnell
hinterherkommen die neuen Tags zu erlernen um noch was sinnvolles
damit
anfangen zu können...
Um so besser - dann entsteht wenigsten gar nicht erst
Hi,
Stefan Schwan wrote:
If this is of concern to you your only real alternative is to not
make the database available
..ist dann schlüssig (und kein herumwinden) wenn man zum einen
bejaht das man eine Lizenz (also kein PD) möchte, und zum anderen
einsieht, dass es Ecken auf dieser Welt
Hallo,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
(*) Es braucht dazu nicht einmal einen Schurkenstaat. Es gibt bereits
OSMer, die aus Protest angekuendigt haben, das Planetfile
Vertragsabschluss-Klausel weiterzuverteilen. Dies waere zwar ein
^--- ohne
Bye
Frederik
hi.
tja, die bugs bekomme ich ja von einer anderen quelle. mitja baut das
aber gerade neu, evtl. kann er sowas noch einbauen.
ciao
gerhard
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 12:44 +0200, Jens Herrmann wrote:
Gary68 wrote:
aber: trotz des letzten rekords ein neuer höchststand bei den offenen
bugs...
Am 30. April 2009 12:26 schrieb Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
Überall da wo highway=motorway ODER highway=trunk + motorroad=yes
UND kein maxspeed-Tag gilt -- maxspeed=unlimited=no=none
das gilt weiterhin auch überall dort, wo Du ausserorts baulich
getrennte Spuren und keine explizite
Hallo,
Am 30. April 2009 13:31 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Um die Tatsache, dass es mit dem Vertragskonstrukt - im Gegensatz zum
Copyright-/DB-Recht-Konstrukt - moeglich sein koennte, unsere Lizenz
beim Transit durch einen Schurkenstaat (*) wegzuwaschen und danach ein
Moin,
mit JOSM 1565 unter WinXP (und auch MacOSX) bekommt ich beim Hochladen
einer größeren Bearbeitung einen Abbruch mit dem Fehler
java.lang.NullPointException.
Kleine Bearbeitungen kann ich nach wie vor hochladen.
Ein Versuch mit der letzte JOSM Stable 1529 brachte auch einen Abbruch,
aber
Am 30. April 2009 09:02 schrieb Sven Anders s...@anders-hamburg.de:
Führt vielleicht zu weit: Kann ich nicht eine ausgediente Bohrinsel irgendwo
im Atlantik kaufen und dort mein eigenes Land mit eigenen Gesetzen ausrufen?
im Prinzip ja, praktisch aber nicht so relevant, da Du für echte
Am 30. April 2009 13:11 schrieb Stefan Schwan stefan.sch...@googlemail.com:
Wenn es weder Copyright, noch DB-Direktive gibt, dann ist es um den
Rechtsstaat eines Landes offenbar nicht sonderlich gut bestellt.
Das ist eine Ideologiefrage, die obige Aussage kann man m.E. so nicht
stehen lassen.
Raimond Spekking schrieb:
Moin,
mit JOSM 1565 unter WinXP (und auch MacOSX) bekommt ich beim Hochladen
einer größeren Bearbeitung einen Abbruch mit dem Fehler
java.lang.NullPointException.
Kleine Bearbeitungen kann ich nach wie vor hochladen.
Ein Versuch mit der letzte JOSM Stable 1529
hi,
mal ein paar daten, wen's interessiert:
- die web site hat diesen monat ~10GB transfer gehabt
- unangefochten interessieren sich die meisten leute für die slippy mit
den unmapped places (246 hits)
- danach kommen diesen monat die relation checks (215)
- relation diffs (170)
- oberpfalz stat
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
das stimmt nicht. Siebdruck ist nicht nur schöner, sondern auch
deutlich aufwendiger (man braucht ein Sieb für jede Farbe), man kann
dafür aber richtig gute Farbe benutzen, die perfekt wasserfest und
UV-resistent ist und daher weder ausbleicht noch verwäscht etc.
Hallo,
Stefan Schwan wrote:
Wenn ich morgen jemand auf meinem Fahrrad durch die Stadt fahren sehe,
dann verlange ich das zurück - auch wenn der Fahrer nachweisen kann,
dass er es aus dem Urlaub im Schurkenstaat mitgebracht, oder auf dem
Flohmarkt gekauft hat.
Da hast Du das Gesetz auf Deiner
Moin Frederik,
* Die Sache mit dem oder eine neuere Version der Lizenz wurde
insofern praezisiert, als dass da nun steht eine neuere Version,
die dem Geiste dieser Lizenz entspricht;
warum macht man dort denselben Fehler wie in der gfdl? Diese any-
later-Klausel ist im deutschen (auch CH und
Hallo,
Rainer Knaepper wrote:
* Die Sache mit dem oder eine neuere Version der Lizenz wurde
insofern praezisiert, als dass da nun steht eine neuere Version,
die dem Geiste dieser Lizenz entspricht;
warum macht man dort denselben Fehler wie in der gfdl? Diese any-
later-Klausel ist im
Am 30. April 2009 10:23 schrieb Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Die hellsehende Anwendung als Lösung aller Probleme, prima. Einfacher
wäre es vielleicht, das existierende Abbiegeverbot auch einzutragen.
Dann gibts nämlich kein Gerate mehr, sondern eine klare Aussage: hier
nicht reinfahren.
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Alles in allem scheint mir diese 1.0-Version eine vernuenftige
Weiterentwicklung auf dem ODbL-Weg zu sein - wenn man den Weg denn
ueberhaupt insgesamt fuer den richtigen haelt.
Ich finde das alles komplett überbewertet, solange nicht klar ist,
ob unsere Daten überhaupt
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
