Also, in case you missed it, the recent typhoon took out a cable in Taiwan,
which has made the internet even slower than usual in the Philippines.
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/170126/typhoon_morakot_severs_three_undersea_internet_cables.html
maning sambale wrote, On Thursday,
Here's my two cents regarding this:
I don't favor using addr:city, addr:village, is_in to specify where a POI
is. Here are the cons:
1. Duplication of info with admin borders (and potential mismatch issues)
2. Increased data size with respect to tags (which makes planet dumps
larger)
On the
Hmmm, I think the guys from the Tagalog Wikipedia can help since they've
been translating interface texts in TranslateWiki.
This is a simple though labor-intensive task. By this time, most of the
languages below should have short articles about each country in their
respective Wikipedias. The
I don't favor using addr:city, addr:village, is_in to specify where a POI
is. Here are the cons:
1. Duplication of info with admin borders (and potential mismatch issues)
I agree, my previous address edits includes only housenumbers and
associated street. And then I added the admin_level
To correct myself:
I am not against ditching the is_in tag,
I am not in favor of ditching the is_in tag
On 8/14/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't favor using addr:city, addr:village, is_in to specify where a POI
is. Here are the cons:
1. Duplication of info with
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Morten Kjeldgaardm...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
I think it is time to separate tagging of traffic laws into a separate
namespace from purely geographical map features. The information is
useful, but the current concept of OSM tagging is not designed to deal
with it
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
The instructions at the top of the pages could also mention the
official_name:* tags - I don't know if these are approved in any way
but I found they were on some of the nodes and I thought it was a good
idea to
Hi!
This discussion seems to be going the same way as it always does - in
circles. :-)
So I'd like to try again for a more general statement and summary.
The need for change
First of all, we would need to agree that there actually is a problem
and that we need to (re)define something to
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Nopekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
The need for change
First of all, we would need to agree that there actually is a problem
and that we need to (re)define something to clarify it. There have again
been many mails along the line It is easy and can all be done
The multilingual-country-list[1] tool reveals a bunch of nodes that
are tagged place=country but aren't so by anyone's definition. For
example the uninhabited Bassas da India atoll[2].
There are also various overseas territories of the UK which should
probably use some other tagging to
Just to confuse matters further:
In England:
Cyclists are forbidden on public footpaths (a legally defined term that is
not synonymous with path or footpath). There is no signage indicating
this - it is just the law. However, a landowner may permit cyclists -
without giving them any rights. This
Hi Steve,
Steve Hill schrieb:
A recent purchase of an Android phone has lead me to play with AndNav2 and
OpenRouteService. However, in some cases I get some unexpectedly crazy
routes.
OpenRouteService doesn't seem to understand the highway=road tag. So
presumably if your destination
Roy wrote
Which do you think more appropriately separates legal issues from
geographical map features, the highway=path or
highway=footway/cycleway scheme?
I would say 'neither' - use the designated tag for the legal designation
and something else (I dare not say what!) for the geographical
... and in England you are forbidden to cycle on all designated footways
unless explicitly allowed! It neatly makes the point about regional
differences.
Mike Harris
_
From: Gustav Foseid [mailto:gust...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 August 2009 19:04
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re:
Useful summary (wish I had seen it before I just posted mine!) ... I agree -
mostly - with unjoining designated in solution 1 ... I am less happy
with introducing =official as we already seem to have made some recent
progress in Ekkehart's direction with the use of designated.
Mike Harris
On 12/08/2009, at 10:38 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
But if there is no default for foot, then what is
routing software to do? If it uses the way, the default is yes, and
if
doesn't, it's no. So the notion of no default does not make at lot of
sense to me.
...
With highway=path, the wiki
Hi,
What might be an unambiguous way to tell that some cycleway is NOT designated?
In theory if bicycle=designated means what it says then bicycle=yes might mean
that yes, it is a cycleway, but no, it is not a designated cycleway. However, I
feel that bicycle=yes means more often that nobody has
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:58:36PM +0200, Lambert Carsten wrote:
That often leads to inconsistencies, but
inconsistent is not necessarily bad.
Exactly, no need to 'force' junctions to have connecting roads on the same
layer. If you really believe in the 'middle of the junction theory' let
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Pieren wrote:
No, there is no problem if you accept that some values are implied by
default for the whole world (e.g. foot=no for highway=motorway) and
some need a default value by country/region which can be documented on
the wiki (highway=cycleway + foot=yes/no).
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make
2009/8/13 Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de:
Proposal #2: Introduce offical dedication
Leave old tags as they are and accept that foot/cycleway and designated
are as fuzzy as described above. Clarify that these tags only give
information on possible use, but not about the legal situation.
Introduce a new
I'm afraid I have just been completely overwhelmed by this thread and
the other similar ones over the last couple of weeks while trying to
have a life too. I am also conscious that it is a discussion that
reignites in different guises every few months. I apologise if I'm
repeating what's
I think the underlying problem with path is that it creates overlapping
definitions. Among data users there is a strong preference for tag
combinations to be hierarchical, and I think that preference is reasonable.
While having to deal with doctor and doctors is only a mild pain, trying
to deal
On 13/08/2009, at 10.20, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Morten
Kjeldgaardm...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
I think it is time to separate tagging of traffic laws into a
separate
namespace from purely geographical map features. The information is
useful, but the current
David Earl wrote:
My feeling is that what we are missing is largely country-specific
defaults. Or rather we have failed to recognise this in the
documentation, but it is what pretty much everyone is doing in practice
already, and that's got a lot going for it.
If cycleway does mean
On Thursday 13 August 2009 00:31:23 Lauri Kytömaa wrote:
Lambert Carsten wrote:
sense. Even though the smaller road ends at the edge of the larger road
not the middle of the road.
Inside the crossing area the roads overlap, neither ends there - you're
on both roads. But you're not on the
Neither is acceptable. How long do you want style-sheets to get?
Plus - what languages are all these tags going to be documented in? How many
languages do I have to read to make sense of them all?
Somehow we need to get to a common-enough definition that we can all live
with. Which is not to
Richard Mann wrote:
Neither is acceptable. How long do you want style-sheets to get?
A list of values mapped to a certain style doesn't strike me as
particularly complicated to implement. Especially as these lists can be
compiled with the help of national communities. I assume if you set up a
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
The multilingual-country-list[1] tool reveals a bunch of nodes that
are tagged place=country but aren't so by anyone's definition. For
example the uninhabited Bassas da India atoll[2].
There are also various overseas territories of the UK which should
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Therefore I would explicitly recommend that the way starts at the
turn-stile following the direction of passing through it, as you will
never turn back once passed, while you might always turn back before
you pass it.
You can add this to the wiki as a recommendation
On Thursday 13 August 2009 10:56:03 Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com
wrote:
The instructions at the top of the pages could also mention the
official_name:* tags - I don't know if these are approved in any way
but I found they were on some
Pieren schrieb:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:08 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
The instructions at the top of the pages could also mention the
official_name:* tags - I don't know if these are approved in any way
but I found they were on some of the nodes and I thought it was a
Hi Guys,
Its time to jump-start the Local Chapters working group. Jochen has kindly
revamped the wiki page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters) so if you have
interest in a local chapter, please read it and add your details to the
relevant section.
I'm proposing having
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Nick Black wrote:
* Give potential Local Chapter leaders and other community members the
change to discuss the proposed agreement
My biggest concern now is the mixture of not-for-profit and democratically
lead organisation. It is a big concern for me that the actual
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
If you need help translating country names for your language and
Also unicode CLDR is good source.
http://cldr.unicode.org/
Lauris
2009/8/13 Jonas Häggqvist ras...@rasher.dk:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that
To be more explicit see this link:
http://unicode.org/cldr/data/common/main/
Lauris
2009/8/13 Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns lafr...@gmail.com:
Also unicode CLDR is good source.
http://cldr.unicode.org/
Lauris
2009/8/13 Jonas Häggqvist ras...@rasher.dk:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
Jonas Häggqvist schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
If you need help translating country
On 13/08/09 16:50, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote:
Also unicode CLDR is good source.
http://cldr.unicode.org/
My reading of the terms of use says we probably can't use it as it
requires that the copyright notice remains attached to any copies of the
data.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
To me it seems standard MIT license. Maybe someone could contact them
about country name data import into OSM and ask special permision?
Lauris
2009/8/13 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu:
On 13/08/09 16:50, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote:
Also unicode CLDR is good source.
http://cldr.unicode.org/
2009/8/13 Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns lafr...@gmail.com:
To me it seems standard MIT license. Maybe someone could contact them
about country name data import into OSM and ask special permision?
There are probably more complete sources like the wikipedia page
titles which the toolserver page even
David Earl wrote:
So I say: keep it simple, keep it compatible. Carry on with the simple,
established tags we already have, but just clarify the default use
classes which apply to each highway tag, PER COUNTRY, and tag exceptions
to these according to evidence on the ground. Add specific legal
Hi,
Stefan de Konink wrote:
For this legal reason Stichting Vrijschrift or Stichting OpenGeo could
never apply. Hence there are no 30 members and even with 30 contributors
their is no democratic saying on anything.
I think this only shows that we must not carve any rules in stone -
On 13/08/2009 18:20, Norbert Hoffmann wrote:
David Earl wrote:
So I say: keep it simple, keep it compatible. Carry on with the simple,
established tags we already have, but just clarify the default use
classes which apply to each highway tag, PER COUNTRY, and tag exceptions
to these
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/8/13 Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns lafr...@gmail.com:
To me it seems standard MIT license. Maybe someone could contact them
about country name data import into OSM and ask special permision?
There are probably more complete sources like the wikipedia page
titles
On 08/13/2009 01:24 PM, David Earl wrote:
realise we are missing a use case (say we discover motorways in Ecuador
permit learner drivers to use them [please don't tell me this isn't the
case - it's only an example]) we have to add tags to every other highway
you don't even have to go that far
Maarten Dammers schrieb:
Hi Peter,
Peter Körner schreef:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
I see you created your
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:37, Alex Mauerha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 08/13/2009 01:24 PM, David Earl wrote:
realise we are missing a use case (say we discover motorways in Ecuador
permit learner drivers to use them [please don't tell me this isn't the
case - it's only an example]) we have
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:24 PM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
So what you're saying is that
- each editor and data consumer has to have its own set of national
rules and defaults rather than defining them centrally (so inevitably
they'll end up different);
- we have to
I thought I'd spend some time on adding name:bo (i.e. in Tibetan) tags
for places in Tibet. I was thinking of copy-pasting the place names
from Wikipedia (guess that's ok), as my knowledge in Tibetan is just
as limited as everybody else's. It's just that I can't find a way to
enter Tibetan text. I
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Nick Black wrote:
I'm proposing having an open call on Monday 17th August at 6pm BST at which
anyone interested can talk through their comments or concerns, as we did in
Amsterdam during SOTM. I know that this is short notice and that 6pm BST
doesn't work for a lot of
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
David Earl wrote:
If cycleway does mean something different in Germany than it means in
UK, why do we try to use the same tag/value in the first place? Why
don't we use, e.g., Radweg for Germany? (Or differentiate with
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those
Maarten Deen schrieb:
Peter Körner wrote:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make
2009/8/13 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
Neither is acceptable. How long do you want style-sheets to get?
Plus - what languages are all these tags going to be documented in? How many
languages do I have to read to make sense of them all?
Somehow we need to get to a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Richard
Mannrichard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
The deprecation of footway/cycleway was
voted on (by not many people, but nevertheless), and the deprecation was
rejected, but some people don't seem to be able to take no for an answer.
It was? Maybe
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:33 PM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
So my feeling is we should document what collection of users a
particular highway tag applies to by default IN EACH COUNTRY (including
things like under 12 or not on a Sunday if that's the normal
situation). Then
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Norbert
Hoffmannnhoffm...@spamfence.net wrote:
I say: forget all defaults and store all those values in the database.
Those only partly documented defaults are the cause of the discussed
problems.
+1. Everyone seems to agree that the current use of
David Earl wrote:
So what you're saying is that
- each editor and data consumer has to have its own set of national
rules and defaults rather than defining them centrally (so inevitably
they'll end up different);
The editors must have some way to set defaults, the consumers will get a
full
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a
bad thing???
If it is millions time the same thing, yes. Look another thread
speaking about TIGER import clean-up.
Of course, llama access
2009/8/13 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
How do you know what is legal vs conventional? Except if you are in
a privileged position, it can only be from evidence on the ground, in
which case what would you do different in most cases?
I don't think it requires a privileged position in a
Roy Wallace wrote:
Differentiate with prefixes? Messy... If cycleway means A in
Germany and B somewhere else, then cycleway is not a good tag.
Instead, we should explicitly tag A where it applies and tag B
where it applies.
This would mean to totally get away from the concept of highway
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Nopekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
First of all, we would need to agree that there actually is a problem
and that we need to (re)define something to clarify it. There have again
been many mails along the line It is easy and can all be done following
existing
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority,
but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database.
Yes, it is. In PERU.
I'd be quite happy to know whether I can ride my llama down my street
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jukka
Rahkonenjukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Hi,
What might be an unambiguous way to tell that some cycleway is NOT designated?
In theory if bicycle=designated means what it says then bicycle=yes might mean
that yes, it is a cycleway, but no, it is not a
El Jueves, 13 de Agosto de 2009, Liz escribió:
I can't even decide if I don't know BST
so could you tell us in UTC too?
BST = British Summer Time = UTC+1
So, 6 PM BST = 17:00 UTC.
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
mE ENCANTA CUANDO NO ME DOY
Peter Körner schrieb:
Hello OSM folks
For the integration of osm into the wikipedia there will be localized
maps in all languages that have their own wikipedia. The problem is,
that a lot of countries are not translated yet.
To get an overview over the status and make translating those
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-)
We have a database, let's populate it. The wiki is to help instruct
people how to best populate the database - it should not be a part of
the database itself.
but this is not real map-information but it is
2009/8/13 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
surface earth Probably the same as surface=ground
should be change to the same as surface=dirt
yes, clean up a little bit: dirt, mud, earth, ground seem all the same
to me (I personally prefer ground).
... and it is NOT assumed
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs that you could use to mark the status of the
mapping at certain places.
I find I sometimes have to skip roads, tracks or paths, because I am
too tired, don't have time, or that I'm going at good
Hi!
Roy Wallace schrieb:
If footway/cycleway is fuzzy in terms of current usage (and I
believe it is), then +1. But I would personally prefer that
designated mean signed. This stays true to mapping what is on the
ground, and separates legal issues from geographical/physical
features, as
Morten Kjeldgaard schrieb:
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs that you could use to mark the status of the
mapping at certain places.
I find I sometimes have to skip roads, tracks or paths, because I am
too tired, don't have
there is something better already
http://openstreetbugs.schokokeks.org/
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dkwrote:
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs that you could use to mark the status of the
mapping
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Nopekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Clarification: What I meant is: Designated only for ways legally dedicated
to one mode of travel. Usually that means individually road-signed, but it
could also be done for a whole area like a nature reserve with a declaration
for all
I think there's a good point of having the redundancy of name:xx tags
even when it is the same as the name tag, because that makes the
translated names more safe. For the Swedish translations I saw several
names that were marked as OK even though they weren't translated. It's
too easy to read
2009/8/13 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
I thought I'd spend some time on adding name:bo (i.e. in Tibetan) tags
for places in Tibet. I was thinking of copy-pasting the place names
from Wikipedia (guess that's ok), as my knowledge in Tibetan is just
as limited as everybody else's.
2009/8/14 Erik Lundin erik.lun...@aol.se:
I think there's a good point of having the redundancy of name:xx tags
even when it is the same as the name tag, because that makes the
translated names more safe. For the Swedish translations I saw several
names that were marked as OK even though they
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
but this is not real map-information but it is legal information you
could also get from different sources. If a way is legally a cycleway,
all the laws and
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
The general format, which could be extended to all kinds of access
restrictions, is:
X:K = L;V, where
X = the standard tag (maxspeed, or access, or bicycle, etc.)
K = the kind of condition
L = the value of the
I've seen todo=job used for this purpose. And todo tags show up in
a number of verification tools, so it will be brought to people's
attention.
Stephen
2009/8/14 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk:
I realized when mapping today that it would be very useful to have a
set of OSM status POIs
Vikas Yadav schrieb:
I made this icon for JOSM.
My not an artist.
This is the top with walls on both sides.
Hi Vidas!
I'm not an artist as well.
Anyway, I've took your icon as an inspiration (your icon looked blurred
when scaled down to 16*16 pixels) and added a similar one to the JOSM
--- On Thu, 13/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I can't even decide if I don't know BST
so could you tell us in UTC too?
3am AEST...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
but this is not real map-information but it is legal information you
could also get from different sources. If a way is
Morten Kjeldgaard schrieb:
I find I sometimes have to skip roads, tracks or paths, because I am
too tired, don't have time, or that I'm going at good speed downhill
and don't want to stop. I've tried to make mental notes to return and
map those missing roads at a later time but as time
2009/8/14 Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de:
Morten Kjeldgaard schrieb:
I find I sometimes have to skip roads, tracks or paths, because I am
too tired, don't have time, or that I'm going at good speed downhill
and don't want to stop. I've tried to make mental notes to return and
map those
2009/8/14 Colin Marquardt cmarq...@googlemail.com:
2009/8/13 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
I thought I'd spend some time on adding name:bo (i.e. in Tibetan) tags
for places in Tibet. I was thinking of copy-pasting the place names
from Wikipedia (guess that's ok), as my knowledge
I am wondering about how pedestrian and car entrances to parking
garages should be tagged. For instance, there are two large
underground parking garages in Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario,
one new and one relatively old. Each is located underneath an outdoor
playing field and has several
Beste Talk'ers,
Dit kwam ik tegen op NU.nl
http://www.nuzakelijk.nl/beurs/2059283/kaartenfabrikant-and-ziet-mobiele-toekomst.html
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas de Lange
Hoofdorganisator Software Freedom Day Nederland
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0_KiVdIOtc
http://softwarefreedom.nl/
Op www.jijendeoverheid.nl staat de volgende uitnodiging:
Een klein aantal overheidsdatabronnen zijn vandaag de dag openbaar, dit
worden er steeds meer. een aantal voorbeelden zijn te vinden op
http://vrijedata.nl/
http://www.overheid20.nl/werkruimte/48/Open%20Overheidsdata
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, samsa wrote:
Is dat niet iets voor OSM-ers, om op te reageren?
We staan er tussen ;)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Howdy,
Vandaag live gegaan. De eerste (alpha) release van mijn.openstreetmap.nl (voor
meer info zie [1]). Hier is het mogelijk om snel en eenvoudig je eigen kaart
te maken voor op je website.
Ik heb getracht het geheel een beetje gebruikersvriendelijk te maken, wat
redelijk gelukt is, al zeg
Klinkt goed! Ik ga meteen kijken
Een kleine tip; als je mailt en je stopt er lange url's in, escape deze
dan met
http://blog.openstreetmap.nl/index.php/2009/08/13/osm-kaartjes-op-je-website-appeltje-eitje/
Anders worden ze afgebroken en raken je url's twisted...
Roeland Douma schreef:
En dan maar hopen dat iedereen een standaard compliant mailclient
gebruikt want ik merk bij de Garmin service dat héél veel mensen
mailclients hebben die de afsluitende '' in de URL gooien waardoor de
webserver een 404 not found teruggeeft.
Ik heb dan ook voor de Garmin service in de .htaccess
Hallo Roeland,
Erg leuk idee :)
Wat commentaarpuntjes:
* Schaalbalkje + pijltjes voor navigatie. Niet iedereen gebruikt
automatisch de muis, evt. i.c.m. shift om snel in te zoomen.
* Initiele breedte / hoogte in de textboxen komt niet overeen met de
kaart. Dus ook al verander je daar niets,
Beste Talk-nl-ers,
Tijdens mijn rondje fietsen door Purmerend vandaag meteen even POI's gemarkeerd
met mijn GPS voor de coffeeshops (ik was er toch). Nu dacht i dat we hier mooi:
softdrug.openstreetmap.nl ofzo voor zouden kunnen gebruiken (samen met
toerist.openstreetmap.nl) daar het wel leuk
Frank,
Dank je wel :)
Over de schaalbar/zoombar zat ik ook nog te denken. Maar dan zou ik dus een
appart voorbeeld iets moeten hebben. Want die zitten er nu nog niet op
standaard (omdat de meeste mensen gewoon een kaartje willen van hier zit ik op
het industrieterrein o.i.d.)
De initiele
Hoi,
De blog is weer van een nieuwe wordpress voorzien. Grijp je kans mail
rullzer of mij voor een account en ga verder met bloggen ;) Problemen mag
je ook bij ons kwijt :)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Roeland Douma wrote:
secondary binnen de bebouwde kom: misschien om het iets duidelijker te
maken: (grote) verbindings wegen tussen wijken in een stad.
Daar zit wat in, maar de 'officiele' ringwegen zouden er dan ook onder
vallen.
Misschien moeten we grote steden en
Vooral bij Stefan uiteraard ;)
On Thursday 13 August 2009 21:53:18 Stefan de Konink wrote:
Hoi,
De blog is weer van een nieuwe wordpress voorzien. Grijp je kans mail
rullzer of mij voor een account en ga verder met bloggen ;) Problemen mag
je ook bij ons kwijt :)
Stefan
signature.asc
Ziet er goed uit Roeland, en handig vooral. Ik heb het getest op Opera, en
het werkt perfect. Als je Franks advies volgt en er balkjes en pijltjes bij
zet, dan zou ik het op prijs stellen als het wel mogelijk blijft om de
kaartjes zonder balkjes en pijltjes op de website te zetten :)
Nog een
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
