dmarc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Brotman, Alex
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Laura Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree walk max depth concern and impact on reporting for domain owners working as expected Scott Kitterman
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [dmarc-ietf] Introducing DSAP/ATPS for Improved Email Authentication Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Brotman, Alex
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Barry Leiba
  • [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject Matthäus Wander
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] General-purpose domains with users from the general public MUST NOT use p=reject Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC is designed to break mail, Example of Indirect Mail Flow Breakage with p=reject? John R Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Weakening of enforcement concern Neil Anuskiewicz
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC Douglas Foster
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) Eric D. Williams
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] THIS IS ABUSE (it might be) John R Levine
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] AOL-compatible mailing lists Emanuel Schorsch
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] not really such a thing as AOL-compatible mailing lists Wei Chuang
• [dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Apr 9 06:00:05 2023 John Levine
• Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Jesse Thompson
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Jim Fenton
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Matthäus Wander
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Matthäus Wander
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Laura Atkins
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Jim Fenton
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposed text for p=reject and indirect mail flows Hector Santos

• Later messages