David Luff wrote:
Whilst on the subject of initialisation order, currently the tile manager
gets initialised before an initial position is set. This means that it
loads a set of tiles centered on lat/lon of 0,0, and then loads a set of
tiles at the correct location. In conditions of limited visib
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
How interesting... I was just about to ask about this kind of thing.
First of all, congrats to Curt and to the mother for the baby. And now
to my question.
Thanks. :-) Today is a day I'm struggling to get through with very little
sleep so hopefully no one will ask me to
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:40:39 +0100 (CET), Frederic BOUVIER
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A correct solution would be to find out why HAVE_WINDOWS_H is not defined
Thanks for the tip!
I added "-DHAVE_WINDOWS_H" to my CXXFLAGS environment variable, defining
HAVE_WINDOWS_H.
Martin Spott wrote:
"Hello Martin, For the time being, we are going to stick with the 0.9.2
version because it works. The protocol we use is the UDP-based external
FDM. We form the structure NetFDM as defined in the FlightGear header
net_fdm.hxx and then send it to the UDP socket. We had problems i
Martin Spott wrote:
Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not an advocate of this company but
I can partially follow their move: If there were _one_ network protocol
that doesn't picture internal data structures of FlightGear but that
was designed with the goal of a universal network protocol in mind,
Martin Spott wrote:
Very wise :-) I'd be a bit concerned that NOAA might close their
service if they realize an increasing amount of requests from the same
host for the same airfield within a too short timeframe.
Wouldn't it make sense to evaluate the timestamp of each dataset and
delay the next
Hi Erik,
I'm Flying along at 3500' doing about 115 kias. There's a scattered cloud
layer about 800' below me, however, it is outrunning me in the same
direction I'm going. This amount of cloud movement can't be right, so I
assert there is a bug in the cloud movement code somewhere. Just for
David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm Flying along at 3500' doing about 115 kias. There's a scattered
cloud layer about 800' below me, however, it is outrunning me in the
same direction I'm going. This amount of cloud movement can't be
right, so
Martin Spott wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to put it into a separate thread - similar to
the preloading of scenery chunks ?
Yup, that and making smooth transitions when the weather does change would
be the next two logical steps in the process.
Regards,
Curt
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent Vehicle
David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
A simple list of id's of metar stations. We can use this list to mark
which airports have corresponding metar data so we don't flood the
noaa site
with bogus queries.
It might be a good idea actually to add lat/lon/elev of each stati
Just in case anyone is scratching their heads over this nonsense commit, I
think I made a procedural mistake on my end ... missed one change in my
commit last night, then had to rechange the file to get it to work
correctly this morning.
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent Vehicles La
Seamus Thomas Carroll wrote:
I am trying to update my autopilot route code to reflect the latest
changes. I read a set of points from a table in a database.
I used to use globals->get_route()->add_waypoint( *wp );
to add the waypoints and then I would activate the autopilot by calling,
globals-
Erik Hofman wrote:
I haven't had any thoughts on how to update the weather while flying
around other than the fact that it might be a good idea to have
hexagonal cloud chunks each representing (a mix of) the reported cloud
base at distant metar stations.
Ok, this was just too tempting to not foo
Erik Hofman wrote:
Indeed, the code reads the metar code at startup only.
Ok, this is useful enough if you want to shoot approaches to a specific
airport.
I had it setup to fetch the data every reset (handy for getting the
right weather when changing airports, but unfortunately at this time
every
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'll try and check in my changes shortly.
Ok, committed. Now what we *really* need is a mechanism to update weather
condtions as we fly based on the nearest weather station.
I vote for some sort of simple approach that just warps the values when
ever they change.
David Megginson wrote:
Yes, it needs to be cleaned up and properly documented. The idea is
that you can have an environment manager that sets the values under
/environment as you fly. The hard-coded manager right now uses the
/environment/config values; I assume (though I haven't checked) that
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Sunday 22 February 2004 00:43:
Right now KBOS has reduced visibility (2.5 miles), but it's not showing up
in FG. Also the temp and pressure and dewpoint is not showing up in FG
either. /environment/metar/ is getting populated correctly, but
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Curtis L. Olson -- Sunday 22 February 2004 00:43:
Right now KBOS has reduced visibility (2.5 miles), but it's not showing up
in FG. Also the temp and pressure and dewpoint is not showing up in FG
either. /environment/metar/ is getting populated correctly, but
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Does the weather fetching code address pressure, temperature and
visibility? Right now it just appears to be updating clouds and winds.
That's what is used and set right now (but only at startup):
pressure, temperature, dewpoint, visibility, cloud elevation and coverage,
win
This month's edition of PC Pilot (http://www.pcpilot.net) has a nice 6 page
review of FlightGear. They include tons of screen shots and say a lot of
nice things. I *think* you can find PC Pilot in large bookstores like
Barnes and Noble, or you can order online from their site. It's a nice
ma
In case any one is interested, here is what I was up to this week. :-)
Born 12 minutes after arriving in the hospital and less than one hour after
the first contraction. Yikes! Everyone is doing great.
http://www.flightgear.org/~curt/Photos/AmeliaEsther/
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
how often, does it update as you fly, does it
pick the closest airport as you fly, etc. etc.?
AFAIK, live weather is only set once for the start airport, and never
updated. This may change in the future. :-)
I notice that the cloud layers are moving. At one point it almo
Erik Hofman wrote:
Thanks to Melchior I and David M. I was able to implement live weather
support in FlightGear today.
For now it can be used by specifying:
--prop:/environment/params/real-world-weather-fetch=true
Erik, do you have any further explanation of this feature ... where does it
get t
David Megginson wrote:
In honour of Curt's return to changing diapers, here's an
aviation-related scatological story:
http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2002/10/03/askthepilot13/index.html
Maybe I should put up a web page for all my personal scatological stories
(along with pictures.) :-)
Cu
Hi, quick announcement ... baby! Amelia Esther, 8lbs 1oz, born 6:12am this
morning, less than 1 hour from first contraction to delivery. 12 minutes
from arrival at the hospital to delivery. Everyone is doing good. I'll be
pretty much offline for a couple days. If I have any pending business
Erik Hofman wrote:
I get a permission denied. This has to wait until Curtis fixes this.
Hi, the directory group ownership should be updated. If you remember which
files need their tags changed, you should be able to go ahead and change
them now.
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent Veh
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
For the moment, libtar is not compilable with MSVC. There are a lot of unix
specific typedef and include files that are not in the compat library.
There are patch for win32 but I think they assume CygWin.
Anyone know of any alternate tar extraction libs?
Curt.
--
Curtis Ols
Installing scenery can be a bit of a chore for people who are new to our
project and don't know exactly how everything is supposed to be layed out
on disk.
This weekend I've hacked up a little helper app that is intended to be a
"sibling" to Bernie's fgrun. I've tentatively called it "fgadmin"
Honest, I'm not writing a windows virus here. :-)
I am working on an fltk app to make it easier to install / uninstall 10x10
.tar.gz scenery chunks. I have the install part mostly working (via libtar
/ libz) so now I am looking at uninstalling.
For unix I can do a depth first traversal of the
Norman Vine wrote:
I certainly hope you are not planning on publishing the 'position' as reported
by the FDM for things like collision detection and related instrumentation
such as a radar display with out some kind of 'adjustment'
No-digging-necessary'ly-yr's
Collision detection could be an intere
Tony Peden wrote:
PS. I'm just wondering if you have any thoughts on my earlier question, i.e.
whether what's being patented has to be something non-obvious?
Amazon: One-click ordering.
I think the answer is no.
Even if it's something that has to be non-obvious, that only means you have
to conv
David Megginson wrote:
Thanks -- that did the trick. The plane is actually flying well, and
I'm starting to feel tempted to go back and do more work to make it a
fully-usable alternative to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#na 172 -- after all, it would be
nice for users to be able to fly a light single w
I want to share some news that I'm very excited about.
For February and March I am being paid 50% time by ATC Flight Simulators
(http://www.atcflightsim.com) to do some work for one of their specific
projects.
They are building several simulators for a customer that will be a
combination of th
If anyone is interested in creating external scripts to remotely drive or
monitor FlightGear, I have committed some convenience functions (perl) to cvs.
For some time we have had a telnet.pl script which takes care of the tricky
bits of interfacing to a remote copy of FlightGear. This gives you
Martin Spott wrote:
With other words: Kalman filters enable you exact guessing of the
picture where mathematical equations don't do the job because you have
too many unknown parameters compared to the number of input sources.
I believe the autopilot mailing list archive contains a lot of useful
exp
Vivian Meazza wrote:
My model of the Hawker Hunter has been forwarded to Curt off-list. It’s
not quite finished: in fact there’s quite a bit that could be done, but
it’s quite usable. I look forward to any comments or suggestions for
improvements you might have.
The Hawker Hunter has been commit
Norman Vine wrote:
My guess is that at some point Kalman filters with revolutionize FlightGear's
simulated control systems very much like they have revolutionized control
systems in the 'modern' world :-)
Kalman filters are generally for filtering noisy / imprecise sensor input,
estimating sense
Hi Richard,
I think I generally agree with Eric. And as long as there aren't any
upstream implications for the FlightGear project, there's really no reason
why you can't split things up any way that makes sense.
If it were purely my decision, I'd split up the FlightGear project
downloads into
There is a nice review of FlightGear on http://lockergnome.com. I couldn't
find it at first until I looked in the web site referrers list. The direct
link is here:
http://channels.lockergnome.com/windows/
This may be one of those sites where older stuff is pushed towards the
bottom and e
David Megginson wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
Windmill (i.e. zero torque) speed is 450 RPM.
Windmill drag at that speed is 47N, about 10.5 pounds of force, or
about 5 equivalent horsepower at that airspeed.
When you shut down the engine in YASim, the propeller does not windmill
-- it just slowly spi
David Culp wrote:
When I zero out my integral and derivative terms, it seems that the
proportional term is doing nothing.
This can happen because of the anti-integrator wind up logic. If the
magnitude of the proportional output is outside of the min/max range, it
get's set to zero. In these ca
David Culp wrote:
In xmlauto.cxx, from line 456:
// Calculates proportional error:
ep_n = beta * r_n - y_n;
if ( debug ) cout << " ep_n = " << ep_n;
if ( debug ) cout << " ep_n_1 = " << ep_n_1;
// Calculates error:
e_n = r_n - y_n;
if ( deb
Andy Ross wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The real fun comes from practicing with only one engine running
[...] There are some real world effects that are important for
training which I don't think we model well on existing twins.
The main one that comes to mind is that with an engine out the
Jon Berndt wrote:
On a related note, I'd like to figure out how to make FlightGear more
useful
for ME practice -- I don't think either of the main FDM's does a very good
job on single-engine, but I don't have any real experience to
compare them with.
?? This is confusing on several fronts. You d
David Culp wrote:
Beat me to it :) Here are two other calculations you'll need, vertical speed
error and mach error.
Hi David,
The reason we needed extra special handling of heading errors is that to
drive the PID module we want the error to be +/-180. Without some sort of
hack you could have
Jim Wilson wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jim Wilson wrote:
That sounds like it might be the right way to do it. Is it better to use a
general flag like that or to have one that is specific to indicated heading as
in the old autopilot code?
Does this work f
Jim Wilson wrote:
It is indeed! Is the altitude hold working for you? I'm finding that the
first stage is outputing values that ocilate from max to min and back in
probably 5 or 6 (not timed yet) cycles. Anyway, I haven't looked at the code
or adjusted any of the parameters yet. I just wanted t
Jim Wilson wrote:
That sounds like it might be the right way to do it. Is it better to use a
general flag like that or to have one that is specific to indicated heading as
in the old autopilot code?
Does this work for the designers (Curt et al), using configuration properties
to manipulate the beh
Jim Wilson wrote:
Roy Vegard Ovesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
The obvious thing you missed is the fact that newauto.cxx is no longer
used, it has been removed from the makefile. So many of the properties
under "/autopilot/config/" do no longer apply.
Yes, but that doesn't solve the problem.
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I'll try to put it on a vertex reducing diet - what is a reasonable target?
It's a very complex model though, with a number of moving parts.
Once I've cleaned it up a bit, I'll send it to Curt off list - it'll be a
few days though.
Vivian, for a first release I wouldn't worry
Richard Bytheway wrote:
A question. When defining a cascade controller, is it important that the
early stages of the controller go before the later stages in the config
file?
Yes, this is the optimal arrangement.
> Alternatively, do the individual PID controllers get processed in
the order they ap
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I've been amusing myself for the last couple of months creating a 3d model
of the Hawker Hunter. It's as accurate as I can make it, with a few minor
fudges for YASIM. Some views are at:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/vmeazza/FlightGear/fgfs-screen-004.jpg
http://myweb.tiscali.c
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
I've slapped together a short document on controller tuning.
[ snip ]
Thanks Roy!
For everyone: I've integrated this into a larger document which attempts to
explain the basic ideas behind control theory and then describes the
specific PID algorithm we have implimented
Hi John,
Try configuring with out the -with-weathercm option. Someone might need to
go in and do some clean up there possibly.
Curt.
John Wojnaroski wrote:
It's me again ;-)
There has been a fix applied to both configure.ac and
src/Cockpit/panel.cxx. Make rue those files are up to date and
Fred,
I just committed a variation of this (assuming I understood the problem
correctly hopefully this will fix it.) Otherwise just holler.
Curt.
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
John Wojnaroski wrote:
There has been a fix applied to both configure.ac and
src/Cockpit/panel.cxx. Make rue those files a
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Small glitch at run time :
route = 0D7673D8
Failed to load autopilot configuration:
fgfsbase/Aircraft/Generic/generic-autopilot.xml
CVS Updated and no generic-autopilot.xml
Gaahhh! I swear I added that file. Ok, it's there now. Sorry about that.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson I
Norman Vine wrote:
Hmm... 1 hour 08 minutes on a weekend
Was any discussion really wanted :-)
Being a volunteer and doing this on weekends and evenings, I've got to move
quickly when I do get the chance. I've been working hard on this and
trying to factor in comments and suggestions made o
David Culp wrote:
Comments? Any objections to committing my updates?
It looks great, and I think the sooner it gets commited the better, so we'll
have plenty of time to work with it before 0.9.4.
I already have a wish list :) mach hold, and vertical speed hold.
Ok, it's been at least an hour a
Jon Berndt wrote:
Yes this is where it gets complicated. There are modes that are obviously
relevant to mere flight dynamics, such as attitude hold, heading select,
wings level, terrain following, etc. -- and even these use *sensor* inputs
as opposed to actual FDM aircraft state data. The other mo
Jon Berndt wrote:
Does this make it any easier to bypass the FlightGear autopilot (and perhaps
soon-to-exist) FCS system, so the FDM could provide this functionality, if
desired - perhaps by simply not including an autopilot/FCS file or
definition through your new method? This is very important to
I'm tempted to commit my autopilot changes to cvs.
Here's what I have done so far.
- I've implimented Roy's suggested PID algorithm. Compared to what we had,
this algorithm is better behaved, is much more configurable, and much more
tunable. It can be made to do a much better job of easing in
Andy Ross wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available.
Oh no! Curt's infected.
We have to kill him now.
Is that Oregon's answer to affordable universal health coverage? :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Martin Spott wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Occasionally, a tile can reference 3d models that require calling
ssgLoadXYZ() ... things like building, bridges, etc. When the threaded
tile loader runs into any of these, it will push the object onto a separat
David Luff wrote:
There seems to be a problem with the fogging on my machine (Linux, NVidia card). When the sun is in, or just out of, the field of view, the fog disappears and visibility is perfect. This is most easily seen by starting at dawn or dusk, and with a low visibility (eg 5000), climb
Ok, I'm abusing my powers here to ask a really [OT] question. If anyone
objects, you definitely wouldn't be out of line. But it's easier to ask
forgiveness than permission, right? :-)
I have some really old, as in ancient ventura publishing files that I'd be
interesting at cracking open and a
David Luff wrote:
Could someone please clarify my understanding of the threaded tile loader?
I'll take a stab at it. :-)
My initial pre-conception before reading the code was that the loader
thread would simply load the data from disk, and pass off a memory buffer
containing an image of the disk c
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
I don't think this should be part of the PID algorithm. I think we
should use your hack and apply it to the setpoint to the v/s or pitch.
This means that we need some sort of if ... then functionality. I just
started looking at Nasal, and I think that could be used for s
Jon Berndt wrote:
My understanding is that they will be doing a lot of thrust
vectoring ... lots of research is/has been done in that area.
Curt.
No. This paper describes tests on a B-747, C-17, and MD-11 using propulsion
only:
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/DTRS/1999/PDF/H-2331.pdf
Differential thrus
Lee Elliott wrote:
Just a bit more grist for the mill - as if it were needed:)
One of the type of up-coming generations of a/c are likely to be controlled by
thrust alone. No moving control surfaces and probably tailess.
What I haven't figured out yet is if the concept's relying upon a very sim
Cameron Moore wrote:
Yes, we can actually. Just filter out this in Mailman:
^X-Mailer:.*Outlook
Problem solved. ;-P
Must fight ... the ... urge ... to ...
Disclaimer. We love our outlook users, just not the virus and security
problems that seem to plague this particular piece of soft
Jim Wilson wrote:
Just a thought :-)
I got lectured once in a job interview (that obviously did not go well for
me.) The interviewer didn't like my answer on the future of computer
security. He asserted that in 6 months (this was > 10 years ago) that all
security problems would be solved becau
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:13:44 -, Richard Bytheway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That would be the responsibility of the autopilot designer. If he/she
designed a control structure that used two separate
controllers that acted
on the ailerons, that would be his/her problem.
Innis Cunningham wrote:
This is what I dont understand what is wrong with the current system
which can do heading,V/S,wing leveler,vor/loc(nav),approach,and
autothrottle
are these not accurate enough?.
Also how much more computing power will be required for what ever extra
detail may be involved.A
David Luff wrote:
tilemgr.cxx contains the following block of code (lines 178 - 181):
xrange = (int)(vis / tile_width) + 1;
yrange = (int)(vis / tile_height) + 1;
if ( xrange < 1 ) { xrange /= 1; }
if ( yrange < 1 ) { yrange = 1; }
It looks to me like there might be a stray / sign
Erik Hofman wrote:
Well, here is a standard that *you* can actually try to influence ...
BTW. XML makes extending the existent layout without influencing the
previous versions possible by nature.
All that would need to happen is for someon to write a plib reader/writer
for the xgl format and then
Martin Spott wrote:
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just read about an XML based 3d file format:
http://www.xglspec.org/
We might want to keep an eye on that.
I must admit that I didn't understand the advantage over existing 3D
object/scene description file formats,
I wonder if this is
Snyder Adam D Civ AFRL/VACD wrote:
Not really, I just need to find a way to clean-up when I am finished.
Here's one option. If you put all your code inside a class, then you
should be able to put your clean up stuff into the class destructor. That
should automatically be called when the program
Lee Elliott wrote:
I've been giving quite a bit of thought to look-ahead algorithms for terrain
following. The most straight forward way would be to take a number of
look-ahead samples each frame, and simply take the highest point as the
target alt.
Taking a lot of samples each frame can't be
David Culp wrote:
This thread is scaring me. I hope we aren't deciding to hard-wire the
autoflight inputs from panel instrument output?
The input choice will be strictly optional, right?
Figures, I just finished screwing the cowl back on ...
The whole point of defining the autopilot via xml is
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
And I firmly believe that we _should_ use the instrument values because
in my mind using /position/... and /velocities/... would be "cheating",
theese perfect values are _not_ available in the real world.
I definitely agree. We should have instrument values well modeled
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Let me share my thoughts about the autopilot:
* I would like to see the autopilot move from c++ code into the
instrument configuration xml-files.
This is my general plan. Right now I have the autopilot config in a
separate .xml file
* The autopilot should get input fro
Tim Jelliffe wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a general question regarding the creation of a model. I have been
working on creating a model of a Learjet 55, using CATIA V5. This is
mainly because I used this during my degree and am basically familiar
with it. I am also determined to have a model which i
Lee Elliott wrote:
Hello All,
I'd like to propose a change to the way that the Terrain Following (TF) agl
value is set and controlled.
Currently, when TF mode is selected, the current a/c agl value is used but I'd
like to change this so that this value is set, and can be changed via the
proper
David Culp wrote:
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 08:29 am, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
FlightGear has been offered free .org booth space and a possible speaker
slot at the Linux User & Developer Expo 2004. This is Oct 20-21 at the
Olympia Exhibition Centre in London, UK. You don't necessaril
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:21:24 -0600,
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
For any of you interested in doing IRC, Nic Fischer has given us a
channel on his IRC server. Just connect up to irc.flightgear.org an
For any of you interested in doing IRC, Nic Fischer has given us a channel
on his IRC server. Just connect up to irc.flightgear.org and join the
#flightgear channel.
Regards,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent Vehicles Lab FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christopher S Horler wrote:
I don't use many cvs commands, but one I use a fair bit is log. However
I've never figured out how to make it only display the last e.g. 5 log
entries or from a certain date... if it doesn't do it it should...
I don't know if there is a command to display the last 5 log
Innis Cunningham wrote:
I guess this question is for David Megginson or Erik Hofman.
I would like to have the ability to turn instruments on and
off in the 2D panel XML file is this already possible.If so how?.
If not would it be a big job to add it to the panel XML code.
Thanks for any idea's.
You
David Luff wrote:
OK, that's a definate now :-)
Ok, so far here is what I have:
- Al West can definitely be there.
- David Luff can definitely be there.
- Jon Stockhill probably will be at the show and probably can help with the
booth.
- Matthew Law thinks he can be there but needs to clear it w
Martin Spott wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FlightGear has been offered free .org booth space and a possible speaker
slot at the Linux User & Developer Expo 2004. This is Oct 20-21 at the
Olympia Exhibition Centre in London, UK. You don't
FlightGear has been offered free .org booth space and a possible speaker
slot at the Linux User & Developer Expo 2004. This is Oct 20-21 at the
Olympia Exhibition Centre in London, UK. You don't necessarily need to be
a developer to help with the booth, but a moderate working knowledge of
Fli
Andy Ross wrote:
So which wheels get controlled by the parking brake on the bo105,
harrier, or 747? :)
This same subject just came up a few days ago. The real bug is that
we're trying to associate brake controls with individual wheels, which
is just wrong. The only standard for brakes in aircraft
Victoria Welch wrote:
I'm thinking I want to get into building panels for FG aircraft.
Either I am missing it or the tools for the job are vi, gimp, an
XML reference and all the FG header files ?!?
Any comments or suggestions appreciated!
I'll chime in with a couple comments.
First off, ye
t,
Thanks for the response. I went through config log (~=2500 lines :)
and am no more enlightended - see below :-(.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 14:14, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Vikki,
I don't see -lglut listed on the link command line. You probably
want to rerun the configure script and mak
Hof Markus wrote:
nice layout... is this a faked frame rate? ;-)
if not pretty good. how come?
Probably because Eric runs on sgi hardware. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Intelligent Vehicles Lab FlightGear Project
Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota
Vikki,
I don't see -lglut listed on the link command line. You probably want to
rerun the configure script and make sure that the glut test there succeeds.
If not, then look in your config.log to see exactly what failed.
Regards,
Curt.
Victoria Welch wrote:
Hi Folks,
A couple days or so
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Walking thru some code yesterday, I noticed the following:
In tilemgr.cxx at lines 319 and 321 there are two entries for adding taxi
lights. Is that what is intended?
Yeah you are right, there is a problem there. I have checked in a fix to CVS.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson Inte
Lee Elliott wrote:
Heh - it seem to me that most of the kids here (UK) just speak pretty bad
english;)
That depends on how you look at it. You could say that english is whatever
english speaking people are speaking these days. Or you could flip that
around and come up with some defined structu
We probably should steer away from the political discussion stuff (on this
forum) before we forget we are working on an open source simulator. :-)
Curt.
Christian Mayer wrote:
David Megginson schrieb:
JD Fenech wrote:
This is pretty sad.
It's times like this when I start to consider relocatin
David Megginson wrote:
Actually, if you're approaching a runway from about 90 degrees, it's the
taxiway lights that you can see -- the runway lights are invisible until
you're right overhead.
Yes, it's a subtle effect and you may not notice it unless you are
looking for it specifically, but all
901 - 1000 of 2882 matches
Mail list logo
