Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

2018-06-08 Thread castarritt
Those MU-MIMO numbers look pretty weak.  The only one I've seen that bad on
our network turned out to be defective.  What does the VC sounding look
like under stats/radio?  Do you have a bunch of VCs that are un-tracked?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Joe Novak  wrote:

> This doesn't tell you what group the users are apart of, more about how
> often you are able to group users on the downlink.
>
> https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/450m-slot-grouping-help/
> td-p/71749
>
> 2nd post,
>
> " What the table shows is actually like a "histogram" of how many SMs are
> grouped together, not *which* group the SMs are in.  In your case, about
> 2/3 of the time there are 5 SMs, and 1/3 of the time 4 SMs are grouped
> together.  Occassionally, you get 6 together."
>
>
> Also see the follow up Matt shared: https://community.
> cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/PMP450M-Grouping-Question/td-p/61580
>
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:
>
>> Beyond the grouping, I would like to know the various azimuths so I know
>> how well or poorly we've aimed the Medusa.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> 
>>
>>
>> On 6/8/2018 12:41 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On the statistics, you can see the mummy groupings, so this means my
>> users are mostly in 2,3,4 elements of the MUMIMO sector? Is there a way to
>> physically know were most users are located within the sector?�
>>
>> �
>>
>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

2018-06-08 Thread Joe Novak
This doesn't tell you what group the users are apart of, more about how
often you are able to group users on the downlink.

https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/450m-slot-grouping-help/td-p/71749

2nd post,

" What the table shows is actually like a "histogram" of how many SMs are
grouped together, not *which* group the SMs are in.  In your case, about
2/3 of the time there are 5 SMs, and 1/3 of the time 4 SMs are grouped
together.  Occassionally, you get 6 together."


Also see the follow up Matt shared:
https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/PMP450M-Grouping-Question/td-p/61580


Joe

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> Beyond the grouping, I would like to know the various azimuths so I know
> how well or poorly we've aimed the Medusa.
>
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 6/8/2018 12:41 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote:
>
>
> On the statistics, you can see the mummy groupings, so this means my users
> are mostly in 2,3,4 elements of the MUMIMO sector? Is there a way to
> physically know were most users are located within the sector?�
>
> �
>
> *Gino A. Villarini*
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>
>
>


Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

2018-06-08 Thread Bill Prince
Beyond the grouping, I would like to know the various azimuths so I know 
how well or poorly we've aimed the Medusa.



bp


On 6/8/2018 12:41 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote:


On the statistics, you can see the mummy groupings, so this means my 
users are mostly in 2,3,4 elements of the MUMIMO sector? Is there a 
way to physically know were most users are located within the sector?


*//*

*/Gino A. Villarini/*

President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968





[AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

2018-06-08 Thread Gino A. Villarini

On the statistics, you can see the mummy groupings, so this means my users are 
mostly in 2,3,4 elements of the MUMIMO sector? Is there a way to physically 
know were most users are located within the sector?

[cid:61A79637-3867-42F3-8E88-7EE2B8D9793D]



Gino A. Villarini


President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

[cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]


Re: [AFMUG] 450m power

2018-02-01 Thread Gino A. Villarini
we are using netonix IDC Sw to a Eltek rectifier.. Works like a charm

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Ty 
Inc <t...@franklinisp.net<mailto:t...@franklinisp.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 8:07 AM
To: "memb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>" 
<memb...@wispa.org<mailto:memb...@wispa.org>>, 
"af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450m power

Good morning,

Looking for an all in one, but reliable, power source for 4 - 450m aps per 
tower.

I have heard netonix a few times but I have also heard about some issues with 
these devices and their support not being that great.

Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online: www.surfici.net

VIA WIRELESS


[AFMUG] 450m power

2018-02-01 Thread Tyson Burris
Good morning,

Looking for an all in one, but reliable, power source for 4 - 450m aps per 
tower.

I have heard netonix a few times but I have also heard about some issues with 
these devices and their support not being that great.

Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online: www.surfici.net

VIA WIRELESS


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2018-01-06 Thread Steve Jones
you should work directly with packetflux to get this going on the bench,
replicate everything you can (cable length, ground, etc). Cambium is not
going to be as malleable

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com>
wrote:

> Andreas, I am doing the same thing.  I really like Forrest Rack injector,
> so I might hold off on that to power and sync it, but I am definitely going
> to run fiber into it.  I am looking at options to do this, and was
> wondering if you came up with a good idea or tap system that you think will
> work to run fiber into the sfp ports?  I might splice a 12 strand loose
> tune on the ground in a breakout box and then use rugged patch cords to the
> radio on top?  I would like to use a tap system but I haven’t found one yet
> that has a duplex lc jumper?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Criag.
>
>
>
> *Craig R. Schmaderer*
>
> *CEO | Skywave Wireless, Inc.*
>
> *Ph: 402-372-1975 <(402)%20372-1975> | Fax: 402-372-1058
> <(402)%20372-1058>*
>
> *Direct: 402-372-1052 <(402)%20372-1052>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian
> (List Account)
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 31, 2017 2:38 AM
> *To:* af <af@afmug.com>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> You can also power a medusa with any PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync, forgot
> to mention this.   Power+Ethernet, but not sync (the 450m doesn't support
> old-style canopy sync).
>
>
>
> Shouldn't be a problem at that length for power, not so much ethernet (but
> use a 56V power supply).   And a lot cheaper than a CMM5.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:06 PM, David M <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote:
>
> here is the link on cambiums site
>
> according to this it has 1.8A per channel/port
>
> https://3fdumf3rqw5xx4mjgywguwz9-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-
> content/uploads/2017/09/SS_CMM5_022117v1.pdf
>
> so I dont see an issue with running all 4 ports with medusa for power ..
> .add the controller and now u can turn those ports on and off remotely.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/29/2017 10:43 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
>
> We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of
> "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
>
> Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
>
> If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of
> similar polarity and connect direct to the power supply.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andreas Wiatowski
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with
> fibre.  To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we
> can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have
> the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of
> upto 500ft!
>

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2018-01-05 Thread Craig Schmaderer
Andreas, I am doing the same thing.  I really like Forrest Rack injector, so I 
might hold off on that to power and sync it, but I am definitely going to run 
fiber into it.  I am looking at options to do this, and was wondering if you 
came up with a good idea or tap system that you think will work to run fiber 
into the sfp ports?  I might splice a 12 strand loose tune on the ground in a 
breakout box and then use rugged patch cords to the radio on top?  I would like 
to use a tap system but I haven’t found one yet that has a duplex lc jumper?

Thanks, Criag.

Craig R. Schmaderer
CEO | Skywave Wireless, Inc.
Ph: 402-372-1975 | Fax: 402-372-1058
Direct: 402-372-1052



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List 
Account)
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 2:38 AM
To: af <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

You can also power a medusa with any PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync, forgot to 
mention this.   Power+Ethernet, but not sync (the 450m doesn't support 
old-style canopy sync).

Shouldn't be a problem at that length for power, not so much ethernet (but use 
a 56V power supply).   And a lot cheaper than a CMM5.

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:06 PM, David M 
<dmilho...@wletc.com<mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:

here is the link on cambiums site

according to this it has 1.8A per channel/port

https://3fdumf3rqw5xx4mjgywguwz9-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SS_CMM5_022117v1.pdf

so I dont see an issue with running all 4 ports with medusa for power .. .add 
the controller and now u can turn those ports on and off remotely.



On 12/29/2017 10:43 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600<tel:(866)%20727-4138>
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com><mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of 
"ch...@wbmfg.com"<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> 
<ch...@wbmfg.com><mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com"<mailto:af@afmug.com> 
<af@afmug.com><mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
To: "af@afmug.com"<mailto:af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com><mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138<tel:(866)%20727-4138> x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or st

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-31 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
You can also power a medusa with any PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync, forgot
to mention this.   Power+Ethernet, but not sync (the 450m doesn't support
old-style canopy sync).

Shouldn't be a problem at that length for power, not so much ethernet (but
use a 56V power supply).   And a lot cheaper than a CMM5.

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:06 PM, David M <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote:

> here is the link on cambiums site
>
> according to this it has 1.8A per channel/port
>
> https://3fdumf3rqw5xx4mjgywguwz9-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-
> content/uploads/2017/09/SS_CMM5_022117v1.pdf
>
> so I dont see an issue with running all 4 ports with medusa for power ..
> .add the controller and now u can turn those ports on and off remotely.
>
>
>
> On 12/29/2017 10:43 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
>
> We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of
> "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
>
> Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
>
> If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of
> similar polarity and connect direct to the power supply.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andreas Wiatowski
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with
> fibre.  To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we
> can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have
> the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of
> upto 500ft!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 <(866)%20727-4138> x-600
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread David M

here is the link on cambiums site

according to this it has 1.8A per channel/port

https://3fdumf3rqw5xx4mjgywguwz9-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/SS_CMM5_022117v1.pdf

so I dont see an issue with running all 4 ports with medusa for power .. 
.add the controller and now u can turn those ports on and off remotely.




On 12/29/2017 10:43 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:


We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com <http://www.silowireless.com/>

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or 
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


*From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" 
<ch...@wbmfg.com>

*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
*Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
*To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.

Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?

If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of 
similar polarity and connect direct to the power supply.


*From:*Andreas Wiatowski

*Sent:*Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM

*To:*af@afmug.com

*Subject:*[AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with 
fibre.  To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if 
we can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does 
anyone have the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and 
gell filled) of upto 500ft!


Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com <http://www.silowireless.com/>

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca <http://www.canwisp.ca>

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or 
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.






Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread David M

Where have u been sleeping :)

Medusa is the beast MassMUMIMO radio

MUHAHAHAHAH!



On 12/30/2017 9:50 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:


The 450M needs 50w? I thought only the AirFiber needed that much 
power.�� Keep in mind that this cable is 23G.� Without running the 
numbers, I�m pretty sure that still works and if it doesn�t, Chuck�s 
would.


Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Yeah but it requires over 50W iirc �vs a UBNT AP 8-10w

*From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net 
<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM
*To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Isn�t the 450m 48v?

Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi 
AP� just saying!


*From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net 
<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
*To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.� We just connected a 
Ubiquiti Unifi radio at 490� and it�s running fine. We used Primus 
direct burial cable for this run.


Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Andreas Wiatowski
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with 
fibre.� To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if 
we can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.� Does 
anyone have the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and 
gell filled) of upto 500ft!


Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com <http://www.silowireless.com/>

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca <http://www.canwisp.ca>

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or 
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.






Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
The syncbox junior Aux port that Neil mentioned is what we recommend for
most people if they are powering the radios in another way.   If you use
this for sync, then I don't see any reason why you couldn't just hardwire
the appropriate pins in a CAT5 cable to a 56V power supply and skip the
CMM5 altogether.   This of course would prevent remote power control unless
you used something like a packetflux PDU to control the power.

The cambium sync card for the rackinjector is coming, will be up for
pre-orders (hopefully early) next week, 99% sure shipping by the end of
January.  There will be a detailed explanation of the exact schedule up on
the web site when we put the units up for preorder.   We were going to have
them up this past week, but we decided we didn't need to book the income in
2017 since the tax man is already taking too much from us in 2017.

We'll give that a month or two of being in the field then will likely
release this circuitry in a powerinjector form factor for the 450i/450m.

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Andreas Wiatowski <
andr...@silowireless.com> wrote:

> I don’t have a CMM5. I have been using CMM4 and Packetflux over the
> years.  I didn’t know PF had a Medusa capable unit on the market…I will
> take a look.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <
> ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM
>
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> Do  you already have the CMM5?  If not I would use Packetflux.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andreas Wiatowski
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <
> ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
>
> Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
>
> If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, j

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread Bill Prince
The 450M is more like 70 watts in actual use. Not all the time, but it 
has to be factored in.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/30/2017 7:50 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:


The 450M needs 50w? I thought only the AirFiber needed that much 
power.�� Keep in mind that this cable is 23G.� Without running the 
numbers, I�m pretty sure that still works and if it doesn�t, Chuck�s 
would.


Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Yeah but it requires over 50W iirc �vs a UBNT AP 8-10w

*From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net 
<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM
*To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Isn�t the 450m 48v?

Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi 
AP� just saying!


*From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net 
<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
*Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
*To: *"af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.� We just connected a 
Ubiquiti Unifi radio at 490� and it�s running fine. We used Primus 
direct burial cable for this run.


Rory

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Andreas Wiatowski
*Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with 
fibre.� To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if 
we can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.� Does 
anyone have the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and 
gell filled) of upto 500ft!


Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com <http://www.silowireless.com/>

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca <http://www.canwisp.ca>

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended 
solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure. 
If you are not the intended recipient of this message or their agent, 
or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please 
immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, 
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or 
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.






Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread Seth Mattinen

On 12/30/17 7:50 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
The 450M needs 50w?  I thought only the AirFiber needed that much power. 
Keep in mind that this cable is 23G.  Without running the numbers, I’m 
pretty sure that still works and if it doesn’t, Chuck’s would.





The 450m is like 7x radios in a single case.


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-30 Thread Rory Conaway
The 450M needs 50w?  I thought only the AirFiber needed that much power.   Keep 
in mind that this cable is 23G.  Without running the numbers, I'm pretty sure 
that still works and if it doesn't, Chuck's would.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Yeah but it requires over 50W iirc  vs a UBNT AP 8-10w

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Isn't the 450m 48v?

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi AP... just 
saying!

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.  We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi 
radio at 490' and it's running fine.  We used Primus direct burial cable for 
this run.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Gino A. Villarini
Yeah but it requires over 50W iirc  vs a UBNT AP 8-10w

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Isn’t the 450m 48v?

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi AP… just 
saying!

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.  We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi 
radio at 490’ and it’s running fine.  We used Primus direct burial cable for 
this run.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Andreas Wiatowski
Thanks Neil!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Neil Smellie 
<n...@corebroadband.ca>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:05 PM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Andreas

We used these

SYNCBOX JUNIOR AUX PORT VERSION

Works like a charm

Neil



On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> 
wrote:
Do  you already have the CMM5?  If not I would use Packetflux.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600<tel:(866)%20727-4138>
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of 
"ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>" 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138<tel:(866)%20727-4138> x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.




--
Neil Smellie
Core Broadband Inc.
Interactive North
27 Dominion Street
Bracebridge ON P1L 2A6
705-224-2673 ext 102


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Neil Smellie
Andreas

We used these

SYNCBOX JUNIOR AUX PORT VERSION

Works like a charm

Neil



On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Do  you already have the CMM5?  If not I would use Packetflux.
>
> *From:* Andreas Wiatowski
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
> We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 x-600 <(866)%20727-4138>
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <
> ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
>
> Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
>
> If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of
> similar polarity and connect direct to the power supply.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andreas Wiatowski
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)
>
>
>
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with
> fibre.  To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we
> can power the M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have
> the answer to this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of
> upto 500ft!
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> 1-866-727-4138 <(866)%20727-4138> x-600
>
> http://www.silowireless.com
>
> Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV
>
>
>
> Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
>
> CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
>
> WISPA http://wispa.org
>
> Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
>
> Paris Chamber of Commerce
>
> Cambridge Chamber of Commerce
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
> The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely
> for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information and may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not
> the intended recipient of this message or their agent, or if this message
> has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by
> reply email and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
> dissemination, copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>



-- 
Neil Smellie
Core Broadband Inc.
Interactive North
27 Dominion Street
Bracebridge ON P1L 2A6
705-224-2673 ext 102


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Andreas Wiatowski
I don’t have a CMM5. I have been using CMM4 and Packetflux over the years.  I 
didn’t know PF had a Medusa capable unit on the market…I will take a look.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Do  you already have the CMM5?  If not I would use Packetflux.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread chuck
Do  you already have the CMM5?  If not I would use Packetflux.  

From: Andreas Wiatowski 
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

 

Cheers,

 

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

 

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca 

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

 

 

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. 

 

 

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

 

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.  

Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?

If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

 

From: Andreas Wiatowski 

Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

 

Good Morning,

 

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

 

Cheers,

 

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

 

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca 

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

 

 

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. 

 


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Andreas Wiatowski
We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5.

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.
Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

From: Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Rory Conaway
Isn't the 450m 48v?

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi AP... just 
saying!

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.  We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi 
radio at 490' and it's running fine.  We used Primus direct burial cable for 
this run.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Gino A. Villarini
Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi AP… just 
saying!

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory 
Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.  We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi 
radio at 490’ and it’s running fine.  We used Primus direct burial cable for 
this run.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread chuck
I would work out ohms law on it to make sure.  
Do you need to run data over the CAT 5?
If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar 
polarity and connect direct to the power supply.

From: Andreas Wiatowski 
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

 

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

 

Cheers,

 

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO

Silo Wireless Inc.

1-866-727-4138 x-600

http://www.silowireless.com

Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

 

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:

CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca 

WISPA http://wispa.org

Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce

Paris Chamber of Commerce

Cambridge Chamber of Commerce

 

 

_

The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. 

 


Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Rory Conaway
If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine.  We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi 
radio at 490’ and it’s running fine.  We used Primus direct burial cable for 
this run.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com<http://www.silowireless.com/>
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



[AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

2017-12-29 Thread Andreas Wiatowski
Good Morning,

We have a couple of large towers where we will be installing 450M with fibre.  
To power we, would like to use the CMM5 , but we are unsure if we can power the 
M sufficiently over such a long CAT 5 run.  Does anyone have the answer to 
this? We could see cat5 runs (Shielded and gell filled) of upto 500ft!

Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
1-866-727-4138 x-600
http://www.silowireless.com
Wireless | Fibre | VoIP | PBX | IPTV

Silo Wireless is a Proud Member of:
CanWISP http://www.canwisp.ca
WISPA http://wispa.org
Brantford Brant Chamber of Commerce
Paris Chamber of Commerce
Cambridge Chamber of Commerce


_
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for 
the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and 
may be legally protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message or their agent, or if this message has been addressed to you in 
error, please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this 
message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.



Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

2017-08-29 Thread Carl Peterson
The SFP port is licensed.
I'm not sure if this is/was an issue with the SFP port or something else.
I had set it to get DHCP in the lab to make it easier to transition to the
field.  When I finally got back into it, it had taken the DHCP address it
had gotten in the lab and disabled the DHCP state...  Not sure if this is
supposed to be a feature... or perhaps I did it accidentally.  The link was
coming up fine at layer 1 but I wasn't seeing anything in the mac table.

  In any case, I'm going to leave it on copper for the time being as we are
way overloaded on that sector and need to start moving customers over to
the 450M.  If/when cambium supports out of band management on the 450M I'll
try moving payload over to the SFP and running management over the copper
port or I'll wait till I get another one in the lab and test it out with
bidi again and put it through its paces before moving this one back over to
fiber.


On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Roland Houin  wrote:

> you will need a license to use the sfp port.
>
> roland
>
>
> > What are the default pins on a 450m with POE out set on the aux port. It
> is
> set to use the SFP but I'm getting nada on that port even with a patch
> cable
> and their SFP. It links fine but is sending zero packets. Hopefully with a
> reset it will at least work on the copper port. <
>
>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707


Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

2017-08-28 Thread Roland Houin
you will need a license to use the sfp port.

roland


> What are the default pins on a 450m with POE out set on the aux port. It is
set to use the SFP but I'm getting nada on that port even with a patch cable
and their SFP. It links fine but is sending zero packets. Hopefully with a
reset it will at least work on the copper port. <



Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

2017-08-28 Thread George Skorup
I don't think there's default plug support on the aux port. Because it's 
not needed. Same as the 450i. Give it a quick 1-2 second power cycle. 
That will make the boot loader pause for I think 30 seconds. Open your 
browser to 169.254.1.1 and you'll see the reboot to defaults option. You 
might have to power cycle once, leave it on for about 10 seconds, and 
then do the 2 second cycle. Been a while since I had to do that on a 450i.


On 8/28/2017 12:38 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:

What are the default pins on a 450m with POE out set on the aux port.  It is 
set to use the SFP but I'm getting nada on that port even with a patch cable 
and their SFP. It links fine but is sending zero packets.  Hopefully with a 
reset it will at least work on the copper port.




[AFMUG] 450M default pins

2017-08-28 Thread Carl Peterson
What are the default pins on a 450m with POE out set on the aux port.  It is 
set to use the SFP but I'm getting nada on that port even with a patch cable 
and their SFP. It links fine but is sending zero packets.  Hopefully with a 
reset it will at least work on the copper port.

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-17 Thread George Skorup
I went through about a dozen SMs on 14.2.1 and 15.x where an upgrade key 
appeared to work the first time, change QoS settings and reboot, but 
they'd boot back up saying it was invalid and the QoS would be capped at 
the previous license tier. Apply the key and QoS again, reboot and then 
it was fine. Cambium couldn't reproduce it. But the last handful I've 
done over the past few months have worked the first time. Maybe it was 
just those radios. I have no freakin clue.


On 8/17/2017 11:34 AM, Carl Peterson wrote:
So after getting the 450M upgraded, it now has the option to use 
EITHER the SFP port or the copper port.  Using fiber for payload and 
coper for management doesn't seem to be an option, at least yet.


Bidi SFPs seem to work fine.  My uncoded FS ones show up like:

SFP Part Details :  
Fiberstore SFP-GE-BX, serial number N0707260011, date code 170727


The SFP port on the 450M is not set in the center of the hole but 
rather sits closer to the antenna side so clearance is going to be an 
issue with some SFPs.  The kit has what appears to be a custom 
machined extended metal gland which does a pretty good job of fixing 
the design flaw with the SFP port.


With the license applied, the Board Model shows up like:

Board Model :   
C050045A102A
P005208
P005208



Could be because I went to the license url a second time when I first 
set it up and there was still no SFP option showing in the GUI.



Cost for the kit is ~$300 which included the SFP worth $10, the gland 
worth $30 (only because they have to have them custom machined to get 
around the design problem), and $260 license to use the port.



On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Jon Langeler 
<jon-ispli...@michwave.net <mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote:


How much is it?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


On Aug 16, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net
<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:


It still blows my mind that use of the SFP port requires a license.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>

<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>

*From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com
<mailto:cpeter...@portnetworks.com>>
    *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied
it, but I can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or
any way to tell it to use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid
and missing something?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson
<cpeter...@portnetworks.com <mailto:cpeter...@portnetworks.com>>
wrote:

Thanks Mark,

Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the
glands that come with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've
ordered the 450M kit and I'll see how it fits and test out
BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated DC-DC +48V bus at
the site at least for now unless someone else wants to test
them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish
everyone would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at
least on gear costing multiple Ks.

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh
<m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:

Carl,

I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and
for some reason I misread this as a discussion of 820’s
and not 450M.

The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to
fit in the 450m.   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at
the moment.  We are supposed to be getting 4 in tomorrow
and I can try it and let you know if it fits.

We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC
supplies through a CMM5

And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I
have not tried a BiDi SFP yet.

Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the
head :-)

Mark


On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson
<cpeter...@portnetwor

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-17 Thread Carl Peterson
So after getting the 450M upgraded, it now has the option to use EITHER the
SFP port or the copper port.  Using fiber for payload and coper for
management doesn't seem to be an option, at least yet.

Bidi SFPs seem to work fine.  My uncoded FS ones show up like:

SFP Part Details :
Fiberstore SFP-GE-BX, serial number N0707260011, date code 170727

The SFP port on the 450M is not set in the center of the hole but rather
sits closer to the antenna side so clearance is going to be an issue with
some SFPs.  The kit has what appears to be a custom machined extended metal
gland which does a pretty good job of fixing the design flaw with the SFP
port.

With the license applied, the Board Model shows up like:

Board Model :
C050045A102A
P005208
P005208


Could be because I went to the license url a second time when I first set
it up and there was still no SFP option showing in the GUI.


Cost for the kit is ~$300 which included the SFP worth $10, the gland worth
$30 (only because they have to have them custom machined to get around the
design problem), and $260 license to use the port.


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
wrote:

> How much is it?
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>
> It still blows my mind that use of the SFP port requires a license.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------
> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
> Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied it, but
> I can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell
> it to use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid and missing something?
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mark,
>>
>> Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come
>> with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll
>> see how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated
>> DC-DC +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to
>> test them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone
>> would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing
>> multiple Ks.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Carl,
>>>
>>> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason
>>> I misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>>>
>>> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the
>>> 450m.   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed
>>> to be getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>>>
>>> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a
>>> CMM5
>>>
>>> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a
>>> BiDi SFP yet.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>>>
>>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>>>
>>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?
>>>
>>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and
>>> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In this day and age…
>>>>
&g

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-16 Thread Jon Langeler
How much is it?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Aug 16, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> 
> It still blows my mind that use of the SFP port requires a license.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
> 
> Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied it, but I 
> can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell it to 
> use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid and missing something?
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Thanks Mark,
>> 
>> Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come 
>> with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll see 
>> how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated DC-DC 
>> +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to test them 
>> out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone would just 
>> support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing multiple Ks. 
>>  
>> 
>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Carl,
>>> 
>>> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason I 
>>> misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>>> 
>>> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the 450m.  
>>>  I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed to be 
>>> getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>>> 
>>> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a CMM5
>>> 
>>> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a 
>>> BiDi SFP yet.
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Matt,
>>> 
>>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>>> 
>>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>>> 
>>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground? 
>>> 
>>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and SFP 
>>> and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.  
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> In this day and age… 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett 
>>>> <af...@ics-il.net>
>>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>> 
>>>> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> 
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>>> 
>>>> The Brothers WISP
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>> 
>>>> President
>>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: "Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>> 
>>>> Carl –
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
>>>> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>>>> 
>>>> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The 
>>>> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, 
>>>> and the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>&

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-16 Thread Mike Hammett
It still blows my mind that use of the SFP port requires a license. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 


Got the SFP kit and entitlement. Created the license and applied it, but I 
can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell it to 
use the SFP port. Am I just being stupid and missing something? 


On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson < cpeter...@portnetworks.com > 
wrote: 



Thanks Mark, 


Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come with 
Siklu radios which are too big. I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll see how it 
fits and test out BiDa. I'm planning on adding an Isolated DC-DC +48V bus at 
the site at least for now unless someone else wants to test them out for awhile 
on -48. Kind of a PITA though. Wish everyone would just support + and - 48DC on 
a DC terminal, at least on gear costing multiple Ks. 


On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh < m...@amplex.net > wrote: 





Carl, 


I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason I 
misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M. 


The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the 450m. I 
don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment. We are supposed to be getting 
4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits. 


We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a CMM5 


And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a BiDi 
SFP yet. 


Sorry for the misinformation. To many voices in the head :-) 


Mark 








On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson < cpeter...@portnetworks.com > wrote: 


Matt, 


While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions. 


1) What are the supported POE pinouts? 


2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground? 


It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and SFP and 
-48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear. 


On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 




In this day and age… 


From: Af < af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net 
> 
Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM 
To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 





A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 









Gino A. Villarini 
President 
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 


 

From: "Matt Mangriotis" < matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 



Carl – 


1) Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA module 
(not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one… 
2) Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit. The kit consists 
of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the entitlement 
key to apply the license to the radio. 


Matt 

From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson 
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 



1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run? Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber. Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked? 




2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed. Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector? 














-- 



Carl Peterson 

PORT NETWORKS 
401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 
Baltimore, MD 21202 
(410) 637-3707 










-- 



Carl Peterson 

PORT NETWORKS 
401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 
Baltimore, MD 21202 
(410) 637-3707 





-- 



Carl Peterson 

PORT NETWORKS 
401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 
Baltimore, MD 21202 
(410) 637-3707 


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-15 Thread Sean Heskett
Yeah check the release notes but I think  15.1 was the first version to
support SFP.

15.1.1 is the latest

-Sean


On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:35 AM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
wrote:

> "SFP kits (part numbers C65L008A and C65L009A) are required for
> SFP port connectivity. SFP port is not supported in system release 15.0/
> 15.0.0.1."
>
> Perhaps also not in 15.0.1
>
> I'll try new firmware.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied it, but
>> I can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell
>> it to use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid and missing something?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Mark,
>>>
>>> Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come
>>> with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll
>>> see how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated
>>> DC-DC +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to
>>> test them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone
>>> would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing
>>> multiple Ks.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Carl,
>>>>
>>>> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some
>>>> reason I misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>>>>
>>>> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the
>>>> 450m.   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed
>>>> to be getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>>>>
>>>> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a
>>>> CMM5
>>>>
>>>> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried
>>>> a BiDi SFP yet.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Matt,
>>>>
>>>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>>>>
>>>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>>>>
>>>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?
>>>>
>>>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and
>>>> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In this day and age…
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett <
>>>>> af...@ics-il.net>
>>>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
>>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>>>
>>>>> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-15 Thread Carl Peterson
"SFP kits (part numbers C65L008A and C65L009A) are required for SFP
port connectivity. SFP port is not supported in system release 15.0/15.0.0.1
."

Perhaps also not in 15.0.1

I'll try new firmware.


On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
wrote:

> Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied it, but
> I can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell
> it to use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid and missing something?
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mark,
>>
>> Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come
>> with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll
>> see how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated
>> DC-DC +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to
>> test them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone
>> would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing
>> multiple Ks.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Carl,
>>>
>>> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason
>>> I misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>>>
>>> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the
>>> 450m.   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed
>>> to be getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>>>
>>> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a
>>> CMM5
>>>
>>> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a
>>> BiDi SFP yet.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>>>
>>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>>>
>>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?
>>>
>>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and
>>> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In this day and age…
>>>>
>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett <
>>>> af...@ics-il.net>
>>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>>
>>>> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>>>> President
>>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>>
>>>> Carl –
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering abou

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-15 Thread Carl Peterson
Got the SFP kit and entitlement.  Created the license and applied it, but I
can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell it
to use the SFP port.  Am I just being stupid and missing something?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Mark,
>
> Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come
> with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll
> see how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated
> DC-DC +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to
> test them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone
> would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing
> multiple Ks.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:
>
>> Carl,
>>
>> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason
>> I misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>>
>> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the
>> 450m.   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed
>> to be getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>>
>> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a
>> CMM5
>>
>> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a
>> BiDi SFP yet.
>>
>> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Matt,
>>
>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>>
>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>>
>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?
>>
>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and
>> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In this day and age…
>>>
>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett <
>>> af...@ics-il.net>
>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>
>>> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>>> President
>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>
>>> Carl –
>>>
>>>
>>> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for
>>> BIDA module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>>>
>>> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The
>>> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and
>>> the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) I 

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Carl Peterson
Thanks Mark,

Was wondering about that gland, it looks a lot like the glands that come
with Siklu radios which are too big.  I've ordered the 450M kit and I'll
see how it fits and test out BiDa.  I'm planning on adding an Isolated
DC-DC +48V bus at the site at least for now unless someone else wants to
test them out for awhile on -48.  Kind of a PITA though.  Wish everyone
would just support + and - 48DC on a DC terminal, at least on gear costing
multiple Ks.

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:

> Carl,
>
> I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason I
> misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.
>
> The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the 450m.
>   I don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed to be
> getting 4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.
>
> We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a CMM5
>
> And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a
> BiDi SFP yet.
>
> Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
>
> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
>
> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?
>
> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and SFP
> and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In this day and age…
>>
>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett <
>> af...@ics-il.net>
>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>
>> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>
>> Carl –
>>
>>
>> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for
>> BIDA module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>>
>> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The
>> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and
>> the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>>
>>
>> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the
>> SFP port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any
>> limitation as to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so
>> we can just run clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have
>> to waste fiber.  Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not
>> worked?
>>
>>
>> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very
>> little space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium
>> gland in whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special
>> gland with room for the SFP and connector?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Carl Peterson
>
> *PORT NETWORKS*
>
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>
> Baltimore, MD 21202
>
> (410) 637-3707
>
>
>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Mark Radabaugh
Carl,

I apologize, I was working on a 820C project earlier and for some reason I 
misread this as a discussion of 820’s and not 450M.

The glands I called out earlier are probably not going to fit in the 450m.   I 
don’t have a 450M I can try it in at the moment.  We are supposed to be getting 
4 in tomorrow and I can try it and let you know if it fits.

We have powered the 450m with both +48V and -48V DC supplies through a CMM5

And since we are talking about a 450m and not a 820c, I have not tried a BiDi 
SFP yet.

Sorry for the misinformation.   To many voices in the head :-)

Mark


> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> Matt,
> 
> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.
> 
> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts?
> 
> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground? 
> 
> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and SFP 
> and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.  
> 
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com 
> <mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>> wrote:
> In this day and age… 
> 
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of 
> Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
> <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
> To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
> 
> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> 
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> 
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>  <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
> 
> 
>  <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> 
>  
> 
> Gino A. Villarini
> 
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com 
> <mailto:matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
> 
> Carl –
> 
>  
> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
> 
> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
> consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
> entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
> 
>  
> Matt
> 
>   <>
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
> Behalf Of Carl Peterson
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
> 
>  
> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
> port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
> to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
> clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  
> Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?  
> 
>  
> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
> space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
> whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
> for the SFP and connector? 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Carl Peterson
> 
> PORT NETWORKS
> 
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
> 
> Baltimore, MD 21202
> 
> (410) 637-3707 
> 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Carl Peterson
Matt,

While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions.

1) What are the supported POE pinouts?

2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground?

It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and SFP
and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear.

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:

> In this day and age…
>
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett <
> af...@ics-il.net>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>
>
>
> *Gino A. Villarini*
> President
> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>
> --
> *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
> Carl –
>
>
>
> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA
> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>
> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The
> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and
> the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
>
>
> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the
> SFP port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any
> limitation as to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so
> we can just run clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have
> to waste fiber.  Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not
> worked?
>
>
>
> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little
> space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland
> in whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with
> room for the SFP and connector?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Gino A. Villarini
In this day and age…

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Mike 
Hammett <af...@ics-il.net<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>



Gino A. Villarini


President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

[cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png]


From: "Matt Mangriotis" 
<matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Carl –


1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…

2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.

Matt

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?

2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector?






Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Micah Miller
At least it's got SFP ports :P

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --
> *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
> Carl –
>
>
>
> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA
> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>
> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The
> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and
> the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
>
>
> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the
> SFP port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any
> limitation as to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so
> we can just run clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have
> to waste fiber.  Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not
> worked?
>
>
>
> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little
> space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland
> in whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with
> room for the SFP and connector?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Micah Miller
Network/Server Administrator
Network Business Systems, Inc.
Phone: 309-944-8823


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Mike Hammett
A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 



Carl – 

1) Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA module 
(not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one… 
2) Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit. The kit consists 
of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the entitlement 
key to apply the license to the radio. 

Matt 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson 
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs 


1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run? Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber. Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked? 



2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed. Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector? 








Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Mark Radabaugh
We routinely run Bidi optics in the 820c’s with no issues.   Our usual vendor 
is FlexOptics, which can be programmed to mimic pretty much any locked optic, 
but we just run a generic profile on them.  They work fine though Cambium 
doesn’t provide any SFP diagnostics (as far as I know they don’t provide 
diagnostics with the branded optics either).

N82L014 PTP 820 Glands_x5_Kit gets you 5 of these:





The ID of the threaded end is big enough to clear the face of the SFP even 
though the SFP protrudes slightly from the radio.

Mark

> On Aug 3, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Matt Mangriotis 
> <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA.  However, if you 
> mean BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support this, but have plans to 
> add this support (via software) in the near future.  I don’t yet have a 
> release this support is targeted for, but it will be on the roadmap once we 
> do.
>  
> Hope this helps.
>  
> Matt
>  
>  
> Carl –
>  
> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
> consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
> entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>  
> Matt
>  
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
> Behalf Of Carl Peterson
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>  
> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
> port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
> to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
> clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  
> Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?  
>  
> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
> space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
> whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
> for the SFP and connector? 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Carl Peterson
Thanks Matt, yes, I meant BiDi.  Assuming they aren't locked to Cambium
SFPs, I'm not sure what would be different about it.  Guess I could just
try coding a Bidi SFP the same as the cambium SFP that comes with the kit
and test it.

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:39 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Are we totally stuck with Cambium only optics?
>
> *From:* Matt Mangriotis
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:35 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
>
> *Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA.  However, if you
> mean BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support this, but have plans to
> add this support (via software) in the near future.  I don’t yet have a
> release this support is targeted for, but it will be on the roadmap once we
> do.*
>
>
>
> *Hope this helps.*
>
>
>
> *Matt*
>
>
>
>
>
> Carl –
>
>
>
> 1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA
> module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…
>
> 2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The
> kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and
> the entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Carl Peterson
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] 450M SFPs
>
>
>
> 1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the
> SFP port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any
> limitation as to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so
> we can just run clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have
> to waste fiber.  Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not
> worked?
>
>
>
> 2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little
> space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland
> in whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with
> room for the SFP and connector?
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread chuck
Are we totally stuck with Cambium only optics?

From: Matt Mangriotis 
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:35 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA.  However, if you mean 
BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support this, but have plans to add this 
support (via software) in the near future.  I don’t yet have a release this 
support is targeted for, but it will be on the roadmap once we do.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Matt

 

 

Carl – 

 

1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…

2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.

 

Matt

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

 

1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?  

 

2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector? 




 

 


Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Matt Mangriotis
Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA.  However, if you mean 
BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support this, but have plans to add this 
support (via software) in the near future.  I don’t yet have a release this 
support is targeted for, but it will be on the roadmap once we do.

Hope this helps.

Matt


Carl –


1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…

2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.

Matt

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?

2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector?





Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Matt Mangriotis
Carl –


1)  Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA 
module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one…

2)  Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit.  The kit 
consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the 
entitlement key to apply the license to the radio.

Matt

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Carl Peterson
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the SFP 
port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any limitation as 
to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so we can just run 
clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have to waste fiber.  Has 
anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not worked?

2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little 
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland in 
whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with room 
for the SFP and connector?





[AFMUG] 450M SFPs

2017-08-03 Thread Carl Peterson
1) I know you need to buy cambiums SFPs to get the license to unlock the
SFP port on the 450M, but once the license is applied, is there any
limitation as to what SFPs you can run?  Would much prefer to use BIDA so
we can just run clearshield simlex with SC SOCs on it and so we don't have
to waste fiber.  Has anyone tested other SFPs in it and have any not
worked?

2) The SFP cage is flush with the exterior of the case and has very little
space in the antenna side of the cage so you can't screw the cambium gland
in whith an SFP installed.  Does the SFP kit come with a special gland with
room for the SFP and connector?


Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-08-01 Thread Carl Peterson
Has anyone powered the 450M via a netonix 48VH port?  I've got one in my
lab it would be the easiest way for me to power up to test and config but
the majic smoke inside the 450M is mighty expensive and I don't wan't to
let any out.  Not sure if I want to run it in production as 80W is a lot of
load to add to a Netonix just so I can reboot remotely.

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
wrote:

> Sounds like the perfect path!
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> The currently shipping recommendation if you want to use all packetflux
> gear:
>
> PowerInjector Plus Sync, in combination with a Syncbox Junior Aux Port
> (seems like you've already figured it out).
>
> This also applies to the cards for the almost shipping rackinjector.
>
> In a couple months there will also be the option of a card for the
> rackinjector which does the new style sync for the 450m.  Once this ships,
> we will likely look at how to do this in a form factor which is better
> suited for the smaller enclosures.
>
> -forrest
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>
>> Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.
>>
>>
>>
>> I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2
>> amps per channel.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>>
>>
>>
>> That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.
>>
>>
>>
>> bp
>>
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>>
>> OK SyncBox Junior works for me.
>>
>> �
>>
>> Would this power supply be OK?
>>
>> �
>>
>> http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g
>>
>> �
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> �
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>> Behalf Of *George Skorup
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>>
>> �
>>
>> The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that
>> is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I
>> don't remember.
>>
>> That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
>> traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
>> that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
>> 70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
>> Cambium Sync.
>>
>> Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
>> Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power
>> the radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
>> PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
>> hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
>> powering + GigE and you should be fine.
>>
>> On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>>
>> What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?
>>
>> �
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707


Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread Jon Langeler
Sounds like the perfect path!

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Mar 23, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) 
> <li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> 
> The currently shipping recommendation if you want to use all packetflux gear:
> 
> PowerInjector Plus Sync, in combination with a Syncbox Junior Aux Port (seems 
> like you've already figured it out).
> 
> This also applies to the cards for the almost shipping rackinjector.
> 
> In a couple months there will also be the option of a card for the 
> rackinjector which does the new style sync for the 450m.  Once this ships, we 
> will likely look at how to do this in a form factor which is better suited 
> for the smaller enclosures.
> 
> -forrest
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>> Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps 
>> per channel.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
>> 
>> 
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>>  
>> 
>> That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>  
>> On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>> 
>> OK SyncBox Junior works for me.
>> 
>> �
>> 
>> Would this power supply be OK?
>> 
>> �
>> 
>> http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g
>> 
>> �
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> �
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>> 
>> �
>> 
>> The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is. 
>> AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't 
>> remember.
>> 
>> That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving 
>> traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with 
>> that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a 
>> 70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support 
>> Cambium Sync.
>> 
>> Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS. 
>> Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power the 
>> radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A 
>> PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or 
>> hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair 
>> powering + GigE and you should be fine.
>> 
>> On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>> 
>> What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?
>> 
>> �
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>   
> 


Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
The currently shipping recommendation if you want to use all packetflux
gear:

PowerInjector Plus Sync, in combination with a Syncbox Junior Aux Port
(seems like you've already figured it out).

This also applies to the cards for the almost shipping rackinjector.

In a couple months there will also be the option of a card for the
rackinjector which does the new style sync for the 450m.  Once this ships,
we will likely look at how to do this in a form factor which is better
suited for the smaller enclosures.

-forrest

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:18 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:

> Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.
>
>
>
> I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps
> per channel.
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>
>
>
> That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.
>
>
>
> bp
>
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
>
> On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>
> OK SyncBox Junior works for me.
>
> �
>
> Would this power supply be OK?
>
> �
>
> http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g
>
> �
>
> Adam
>
> �
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *George Skorup
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync
>
> �
>
> The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is.
> AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I
> don't remember.
>
> That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
> traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
> that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
> 70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
> Cambium Sync.
>
> Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
> Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power
> the radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
> PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
> hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
> powering + GigE and you should be fine.
>
> On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>
> What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?
>
> �
>
>
>



-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>


Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread George Skorup
The PowerInjector+Sync, the regular GigE 4 & 8 port injector as well as 
the single port GigE injector will all do 2A using 4-pair powering. 2 
pairs +, 2 pairs -, 1A per pair = 2A forward, 2A return.


On 3/23/2017 2:18 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:


Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.

I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 
amps per channel.


Adam

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

OK SyncBox Junior works for me.

�

Would this power supply be OK?

�

http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g

�

Adam

�

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
*Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

�

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell
that is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might
support it, I don't remember.

That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and
receiving traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux
PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with that is, you're interrupting
power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a 70W load (the 450m).
Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support Cambium Sync.

Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a
UGPS. Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in
and go. Power the radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A
supply. A PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE
injector boards. Or hell, even his single-port GigE injector.
Anything that support 4-pair powering + GigE and you should be fine.

On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?

�





Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread SmarterBroadband
Looks like the POWERINJECTOR PLUS SYNC - GIGABIT VERSION does 2 amps.

So that and a large Meanwell PSU would be one way to power 4 450M.

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

 

Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.

 

I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps
per channel.

 

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

 

That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 

On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

OK SyncBox Junior works for me.

�

Would this power supply be OK?

�

http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g

�

Adam

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

�

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is.
AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't
remember.

That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
Cambium Sync.

Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power the
radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
powering + GigE and you should be fine.

On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?

�

 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread SmarterBroadband
Yea only one.  450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!!  Hence this 100 watt POE.

 

I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps
per channel.

 

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

 

That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.

 

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 

On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

OK SyncBox Junior works for me.

�

Would this power supply be OK?

�

http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g

�

Adam

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

�

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is.
AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't
remember.

That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
Cambium Sync.

Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power the
radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
powering + GigE and you should be fine.

On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?

�

 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread Bill Prince

That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:


OK SyncBox Junior works for me.

Would this power supply be OK?

http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g

Adam

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
*Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that 
is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support 
it, I don't remember.


That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and 
receiving traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux 
PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with that is, you're interrupting power 
(the sync pulse) while trying to run a 70W load (the 450m). Forrest 
said he's working on new stuff to support Cambium Sync.


Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS. 
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. 
Power the radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A 
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector 
boards. Or hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that 
support 4-pair powering + GigE and you should be fine.


On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?





Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread SmarterBroadband
OK SyncBox Junior works for me.

 

Would this power supply be OK?

 

http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g

 

Adam

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

 

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is.
AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't
remember.

That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
Cambium Sync.

Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power the
radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
powering + GigE and you should be fine.

On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?

 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread Darren Shea
We’re using the PacketFlux SyncBox Junior Aux Port and the Cambium official
“AC+DC Enhanced Power Injector”. Can’t remotely power-cycle, but it is
pretty stable (other than the random SM session drops).

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

 

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is.
AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't
remember.

That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving
traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. Problem with
that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while trying to run a
70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new stuff to support
Cambium Sync.

Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS.
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power the
radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. Or
hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 4-pair
powering + GigE and you should be fine.

On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:

What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?

 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread George Skorup
The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that 
is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, 
I don't remember.


That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and 
receiving traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync. 
Problem with that is, you're interrupting power (the sync pulse) while 
trying to run a 70W load (the 450m). Forrest said he's working on new 
stuff to support Cambium Sync.


Probably the best option right now is a SyncBox Junior Aux. Or a UGPS. 
Enable UGPS power on the Aux port in the radio, plug it in and go. Power 
the radio with whatever. GigE-POE-APC and a 56VDC/2A supply. A 
PowerInjector+Sync. Or Forrest's 4-port or 8-port GigE injector boards. 
Or hell, even his single-port GigE injector. Anything that support 
4-pair powering + GigE and you should be fine.


On 3/23/2017 11:51 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:


What POE�s and Sync are people using with 450M?





[AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

2017-03-23 Thread SmarterBroadband
What POE's and Sync are people using with 450M?



Re: [AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread Adam Moffett
Interestingthe VC limit had never been a practical limit the whole 
time I used Canopy.  I guess we're saying it could be now?




-- Original Message --
From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 3/6/2017 6:51:23 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M

The VC limit is still 238 on 2.5ms framing. 5ms framing cuts that in 
half. The HP channel enabled on an SM also sucks up a VC, so keep that 
in mind.


On 3/6/2017 5:35 PM, Dan Petermann wrote:

Maximum amount of SMs.

The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of 
bandwidth before reaching that limit.


With the 450M having a potential of 3-4 times the bandwidth capacity, 
the number of VCs available may become a limit. Right now we hit 60-70 
customers per AP before the downlink utilization is hitting max 
capacity. With three times the bandwidth available, 180-210 customers 
becomes doable. If 10-15% has our voip service, that cuts the 
available VCs down and limits the amount of customers that can be 
installed.


Will that happen? Probably not, and if so, thats a good problem to 
have.


I�m curious if the max SM count has been increased.

On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

I don't think there is an answer.  Or are you asking what is the 
maximum number of SMs it will register to?

At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200.

Or are you asking about loading and performance?

-Original Message- From: Dan Petermann
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M

How many SMs can a 450M handle?

I can�t seem to find the answer in the manual






Re: [AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread Trey Scarborough

I can say it works fine with 130+ that's what we have on up to so far.


On 3/6/2017 5:51 PM, George Skorup wrote:
The VC limit is still 238 on 2.5ms framing. 5ms framing cuts that in 
half. The HP channel enabled on an SM also sucks up a VC, so keep that 
in mind.


On 3/6/2017 5:35 PM, Dan Petermann wrote:

Maximum amount of SMs.

The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of 
bandwidth before reaching that limit.


With the 450M having a potential of 3-4 times the bandwidth capacity, 
the number of VCs available may become a limit. Right now we hit 
60-70 customers per AP before the downlink utilization is hitting max 
capacity. With three times the bandwidth available, 180-210 customers 
becomes doable. If 10-15% has our voip service, that cuts the 
available VCs down and limits the amount of customers that can be 
installed.


Will that happen? Probably not, and if so, thats a good problem to have.

I�m curious if the max SM count has been increased.

On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

I don't think there is an answer.  Or are you asking what is the 
maximum number of SMs it will register to?

At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200.

Or are you asking about loading and performance?

-Original Message- From: Dan Petermann
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M

How many SMs can a 450M handle?

I can�t seem to find the answer in the manual









Re: [AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread George Skorup
The VC limit is still 238 on 2.5ms framing. 5ms framing cuts that in 
half. The HP channel enabled on an SM also sucks up a VC, so keep that 
in mind.


On 3/6/2017 5:35 PM, Dan Petermann wrote:

Maximum amount of SMs.

The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of bandwidth 
before reaching that limit.

With the 450M having a potential of 3-4 times the bandwidth capacity, the 
number of VCs available may become a limit. Right now we hit 60-70 customers 
per AP before the downlink utilization is hitting max capacity. With three 
times the bandwidth available, 180-210 customers becomes doable. If 10-15% has 
our voip service, that cuts the available VCs down and limits the amount of 
customers that can be installed.

Will that happen? Probably not, and if so, thats a good problem to have.

I�m curious if the max SM count has been increased.

On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:


I don't think there is an answer.  Or are you asking what is the maximum number 
of SMs it will register to?
At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200.

Or are you asking about loading and performance?

-Original Message- From: Dan Petermann
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M

How many SMs can a 450M handle?

I can�t seem to find the answer in the manual




Re: [AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread Dan Petermann
Maximum amount of SMs. 

The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of bandwidth 
before reaching that limit. 

With the 450M having a potential of 3-4 times the bandwidth capacity, the 
number of VCs available may become a limit. Right now we hit 60-70 customers 
per AP before the downlink utilization is hitting max capacity. With three 
times the bandwidth available, 180-210 customers becomes doable. If 10-15% has 
our voip service, that cuts the available VCs down and limits the amount of 
customers that can be installed. 

Will that happen? Probably not, and if so, thats a good problem to have. 

I’m curious if the max SM count has been increased.

On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> I don't think there is an answer.  Or are you asking what is the maximum 
> number of SMs it will register to?
> At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200.
> 
> Or are you asking about loading and performance?
> 
> -Original Message- From: Dan Petermann
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:11 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] 450M
> 
> How many SMs can a 450M handle?
> 
> I can�t seem to find the answer in the manual 



Re: [AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread Chuck McCown
I don't think there is an answer.  Or are you asking what is the maximum 
number of SMs it will register to?

At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200.

Or are you asking about loading and performance?

-Original Message- 
From: Dan Petermann

Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450M

How many SMs can a 450M handle?

I can�t seem to find the answer in the manual 



[AFMUG] 450M

2017-03-06 Thread Dan Petermann
How many SMs can a 450M handle?

I can’t seem to find the answer in the manual

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread Chris Wright
I can attest to it. Some customers who were fringe at 2x leapt to 6x 
modulation, at least one went from 2x to 8x.  450 AP @ 40 degree sector -> 450M 
AP.

Chris Wright
Network Administrator

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Mangriotis
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

I would suggest trying it.  The 450m also has 5-6 dB better uplink sensitivity. 
 When you add the uplink beamforming gains to this, you'll see uplink 
modulation improvements in nearly all the SMs on the sector.  Others can chime 
in with their experiences, but there's enough evidence of this, that I am 
confident in it.

Matt (@CambiumMatt)

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

> IIRC, the 450m does not have the active filter like the 450i. They are 
> instead relying on the beam-steering to combat the noise.

That's a bit disappointing.  We have sites that have PTP450 backhauls and 
PMP450 AP's in 5 ghz band on same tower.


Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread Matt Mangriotis
I would suggest trying it.  The 450m also has 5-6 dB better uplink sensitivity. 
 When you add the uplink beamforming gains to this, you'll see uplink 
modulation improvements in nearly all the SMs on the sector.  Others can chime 
in with their experiences, but there's enough evidence of this, that I am 
confident in it.

Matt (@CambiumMatt)

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:31 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

> IIRC, the 450m does not have the active filter like the 450i. They are 
> instead relying on the beam-steering to combat the noise.

That's a bit disappointing.  We have sites that have PTP450 backhauls and 
PMP450 AP's in 5 ghz band on same tower.


Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread Matt
> IIRC, the 450m does not have the active filter like the 450i. They are
> instead relying on the beam-steering to combat the noise.

That's a bit disappointing.  We have sites that have PTP450 backhauls
and PMP450 AP's in 5 ghz band on same tower.


Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread George Skorup
IIRC, the 450m does not have the active filter like the 450i. They are 
instead relying on the beam-steering to combat the noise.


On 2/17/2017 11:31 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:


Hi Craig

We had a 450 fail a while back and we replaced it with a 450i. The 
customers connections improved so we see the 450i as an upgrade.  I 
don�t know if it was just due to the new sector being better or some 
magic in the radio.  The two main towers where we have 450 are very 
noisy, maybe it is the adaptive filter doing its thing?


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Craig Schmaderer
*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 6:17 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

Adam, do you need more processing power or the uplink noise filter? 
 My 450 are performing just fine.  I don't see a huge reason to 
upgrade just to a 450i. I have a few that will go to a full 450m this 
year. Just curious on your thoughts.




*From:*Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net <mailto:li...@sbb.net>>

*Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:40:10 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

J

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:36 PM
*To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

Welcome back comrade

On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <li...@sbb.net 
<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote:


Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs
450i integrated sector?

I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or
better than the new integrated sector version of the 450i.

I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of
upgrading to 450i, but with the 450m limited being available I am
considering going in that direction saving another clime in a year
or so.

I just don�t know what the performance of the m antenna would be
like on sector mode.

Thanks

Adam





Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread SmarterBroadband
Hi Craig

 

We had a 450 fail a while back and we replaced it with a 450i.  The
customers connections improved so we see the 450i as an upgrade.  I don't
know if it was just due to the new sector being better or some magic in the
radio.  The two main towers where we have 450 are very noisy, maybe it is
the adaptive filter doing its thing?

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Craig Schmaderer
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 6:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

 

Adam, do you need more processing power or the uplink noise filter?  My 450
are performing just fine.  I don't see a huge reason to upgrade just to a
450i. I have a few that will go to a full 450m this year. Just curious on
your thoughts. 

 

  _  

From: Af < <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of
SmarterBroadband < <mailto:li...@sbb.net> li...@sbb.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:40:10 PM
To:  <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector 

 

:)

 

From: Af [ <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On
Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:36 PM
To: Animal Farm < <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

 

Welcome back comrade

 

On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <li...@sbb.net
<mailto:li...@sbb.net> > wrote:

Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i
integrated sector?

 

I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better than
the new integrated sector version of the 450i.

 

I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of upgrading to
450i, but with the 450m limited being available I am considering going in
that direction saving another clime in a year or so.

 

I just don't know what the performance of the m antenna would be like on
sector mode.

 

Thanks

 

Adam



Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-17 Thread Craig Schmaderer
Adam, do you need more processing power or the uplink noise filter?  My 450 are 
performing just fine.  I don't see a huge reason to upgrade just to a 450i. I 
have a few that will go to a full 450m this year. Just curious on your thoughts.



From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:40:10 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

:)

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:36 PM
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

Welcome back comrade

On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband" 
<li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote:
Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i integrated 
sector?

I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better than 
the new integrated sector version of the 450i.

I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of upgrading to 450i, 
but with the 450m limited being available I am considering going in that 
direction saving another clime in a year or so.

I just don’t know what the performance of the m antenna would be like on sector 
mode.

Thanks

Adam


Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-16 Thread SmarterBroadband
:)

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:36 PM
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

 

Welcome back comrade

 

On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <li...@sbb.net 
<mailto:li...@sbb.net> > wrote:

Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i integrated 
sector?

 

I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better than 
the new integrated sector version of the 450i.

 

I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of upgrading to 450i, 
but with the 450m limited being available I am considering going in that 
direction saving another clime in a year or so.

 

I just don’t know what the performance of the m antenna would be like on sector 
mode.

 

Thanks

 

Adam



Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-16 Thread Jaime Solorza
Welcome back comrade

On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband"  wrote:

> Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i
> integrated sector?
>
>
>
> I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better
> than the new integrated sector version of the 450i.
>
>
>
> I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of upgrading to
> 450i, but with the 450m limited being available I am considering going in
> that direction saving another clime in a year or so.
>
>
>
> I just don’t know what the performance of the m antenna would be like on
> sector mode.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Adam
>


[AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

2017-02-16 Thread SmarterBroadband
Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i
integrated sector?

 

I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better than
the new integrated sector version of the 450i.

 

I have a couple of locations with old 450 I was thinking of upgrading to
450i, but with the 450m limited being available I am considering going in
that direction saving another clime in a year or so.

 

I just don't know what the performance of the m antenna would be like on
sector mode.

 

Thanks

 

Adam



Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-13 Thread Super WISP
WAV has the CMM5, POE, and 450M Units in stock.

Mark Chamerlik
Strategic Account Manager-East Coast
[cid:image001.jpg@01D14A33.56536AF0]
630-818-1004 OFFICE
815-822-4490 CELL
ma...@wavonline.com<mailto:ma...@wavonline.com>
www.wavonline.com<http://www.wavonline.com/>

For additional assistance: email 
tea...@wavonline.com<mailto:tea...@wavonline.com>

NEW: 2016 IMPROVEMENTS TO WAV’S BUSINESS 
MANAGEMENT<http://www.wavonline.com/news/system-improvements.aspx>
[Description: twitter-logo-100x100.png]<http://twitter.com/#!/WAVonline/> 
[Description: fb-logo-100x100.png] 
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/WAV-Inc/290775077620146>

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Yuchasz
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 6:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Forest,
We are really excited about this product as well. I have actually held off on 
quite a few orders making due with older equipment while we waited for this new 
product. Let us know when we can get on the list…

Brandon


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List 
Account)
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:22 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Very very close...

I'll be taking pre-orders as soon as I have a confirmed ship date on the 
enclosures, and am confident that I don't have a major design issue on the 
latest set of circuit boards (looking good so far).   I'm expecting this to 
happen in the next week or so, but I can't be 100% confident yet.

The ship dates after that will depend on the arrival of the enclosures and the 
final circuit boards.



On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Craig Schmaderer 
<cr...@skywaveconnect.com<mailto:cr...@skywaveconnect.com>> wrote:
Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready!  I want now!


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Ken 
Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and PCTel/Maxrad via 
executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that, since I had experience 
with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not comment further since this 
list is public and I don’t want to get sued.  I will note that if I remember 
correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was 
evident in his dealings with coworkers.


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf 
Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year at their 
request due to their deal with Earthlink)

I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.

[he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:


  1.  WB is taking advantage of Motorola.
  2.  WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!)
  3.  WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars.
  4.  Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty.
  5.  Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger.
  6.  (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw a 
waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).

[he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)

I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.

He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  I 
repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I finally had to 
hang up on him .



--
Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com<mailto:forre...@imach.com> | 
http://www.packetflux.com<http://www.packetflux.com/>
[https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/linkedin.png]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
 [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/facebook.png] 
<http://facebook.com/packetflux>  
[https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/twitter.png] 
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-13 Thread Daniel White
I’m way late to this thread… but ConVergence does have the CMM5 controllers and 
56VDC injectors in stock.



The 29VDC injectors are still a bit of a ways out.



Daniel White

Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

ConVergence Technologies

Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590

 <mailto:dwh...@converge-tech.com> dwh...@converge-tech.com



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m



Cambium would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling 
kids!



On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com 
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com> > wrote:

I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5.



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM


To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m



All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it will not 
pass certain specs.



But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge suppressors as the 
first line of defense.

If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade performance.



From: Ken Hohhof

Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM

To:  <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m



Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec sheet.  David, 
can you post a photo of your setup?



It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate 
controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 8 ports 
with integral controller.



Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, in 1U 
rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?



You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge protection 
like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 unit if it takes a hit.  
If you still use a separate surge protector, like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf 
modules, does the double surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?



The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 450i/450m, as well 
as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever power supply you connect to 
the module?  As opposed to generating the appropriate voltages internally from 
the 48V input?





From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m



If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products to go 
with it.

Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the base or 
control point.

Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within highly 
dense areas.

Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design and 
stackable ports for up to

32 controlled ports from one controller.





On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 <tel:(312)%20205-2519>  Office

574-220-7826 <tel:(574)%20220-7826>  Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net 
<mailto:j...@velociter.net> > wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?



Thanks,

Josh



--






---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-12 Thread Brandon Yuchasz
Forest,

We are really excited about this product as well. I have actually held off on 
quite a few orders making due with older equipment while we waited for this new 
product. Let us know when we can get on the list…

 

Brandon

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List 
Account)
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:22 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Very very close...

 

I'll be taking pre-orders as soon as I have a confirmed ship date on the 
enclosures, and am confident that I don't have a major design issue on the 
latest set of circuit boards (looking good so far).   I'm expecting this to 
happen in the next week or so, but I can't be 100% confident yet.

 

The ship dates after that will depend on the arrival of the enclosures and the 
final circuit boards.   

 

 

 

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com> 
wrote:

Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready!  I want now!

 

  _  

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m 

 

I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and PCTel/Maxrad via 
executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that, since I had experience 
with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not comment further since this 
list is public and I don’t want to get sued.  I will note that if I remember 
correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was 
evident in his dealings with coworkers.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year at their 
request due to their deal with Earthlink)

 

I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.

 

[he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:

 

1.  WB is taking advantage of Motorola. 
2.  WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!) 
3.  WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars. 
4.  Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty. 
5.  Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger. 
6.  (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw 
a waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).

 

[he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)

 

I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.

 

He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  I 
repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I finally had to 
hang up on him .




-- 


Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602

 <mailto:forre...@imach.com> forre...@imach.com |  <http://www.packetflux.com/> 
http://www.packetflux.com

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>   <http://facebook.com/packetflux>   
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux> 

  <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose>   
<http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
   
<http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
 



Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-12 Thread Dave

yeah sorry my S4 is crap LOL


On 01/12/2017 01:18 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:

Wow, blurry AF

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on 
behalf of David Milholen <dmilho...@wletc.com 
<mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 1:36 PM
To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com>>

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Ok,
 Here are some pics and yes to everything but the trip part because i 
have not tested that yet.



*//*

*/Gino Villarini/*

President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

On 01/11/2017 11:35 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


Comparison to CTM2 might be apples to oranges, since it doesn�t 
support �CambiumSYNC� and probably can�t power a 450m.


On price, another comparison would be the new modular Packetflux 
SyncInjector just coming out, although the first version will not 
have CambiumSYNC.


Lacking a spec sheet or a user guide, I wonder about some features we 
get with CTM2 or SyncInjector:


- can you remotely enable/disable power and sync to each port?

- does it monitor current or power consumption per port?

- does it have remotely resettable fuses per port?

I know that after a storm, sometimes we have ports in a TRIP state 
from overcurrent, but reset the electronic fuse and it comes back to 
life.


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 8:16 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Negative,

Notice the green ports in the front for making your direct 
connections to a DC source.


This design works well for us since all of our sites now have a 29v 
and 48v supply system.


When we add one of these to an older site for upgrade we will leave 
the cmm4 for the 29v gear


and install the cmm5 for the newer 450i/m gear. As we swap out older 
450 gear to 450i or M we will


just add more controller modules. Which is much less than paying 
another 1800+ for a whole cmm4 or ctm2


I have one site that has 3 cmm4 and the 3rd is only using one port.

Keep in mind the idea is to move to more capacity at your own pace 
without going back every 6months to upgrade.


All ports are gige with built in surge on each port. The CTM2 or the 
Cmm4 has never failed me on protection.


On 1/10/2017 5:16 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:

Is that it's power supply hanging off of the back?

On 1/10/2017 5:14 PM, Dave wrote:

Thats all there is that I could find or get at this time. I
am sure more to follow.

On 01/10/2017 12:14 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:

Through online chat I asked Cambium the other day for a
spec sheet.  All they gave me was the quick start guide.
Attached.

On 1/10/2017 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium
documentation on the CMM5.

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of
*ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM
        *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection
built in or it will not pass certain specs.

But you need replicable/expendable  robust external
surge suppressors as the first line of defense.

If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will
not degrade performance.

*From:*Ken Hohhof

*Sent:*Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM

*To:*af@afmug.com

*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can
get us a spec sheet.  David, can you post a photo of
your setup?

It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports,
plus a separate controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers. 
Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 8 ports with

integral controller.

Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and
a controller, in 1U rackmount?  Are you using the
controller?  Does it exist yet?

You mention surge protection, does that mean it has
integral surge protection like the CTM2?  Downside
would be frying a whole $1000 unit if it takes a hit.
If you still use a separate surge protector, like
maybe Chuck�s APC shelf modules, does the double
surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?

The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs
   

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-12 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Very very close...

I'll be taking pre-orders as soon as I have a confirmed ship date on the
enclosures, and am confident that I don't have a major design issue on the
latest set of circuit boards (looking good so far).   I'm expecting this to
happen in the next week or so, but I can't be 100% confident yet.

The ship dates after that will depend on the arrival of the enclosures and
the final circuit boards.



On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Craig Schmaderer <cr...@skywaveconnect.com>
wrote:

> Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready!  I want now!
>
>
> --
> *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
> >
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m
>
>
> I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and
> PCTel/Maxrad via executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that,
> since I had experience with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not
> comment further since this list is public and I don’t want to get sued.  I
> will note that if I remember correctly, his PhD was actually in
> Experimental Psychology, and this was evident in his dealings with
> coworkers.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m
>
>
>
> Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I
> had with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to
> be listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year
> at their request due to their deal with Earthlink)
>
>
>
> I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is
> not worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . .
> email.
>
>
>
> [he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for
> the most part erroneous as listed below:
>
>
>
>1. WB is taking advantage of Motorola.
>2. WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!)
>3. WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars.
>4. Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty.
>5. Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz
>stinger.
>6. (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just
>draw a waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he
>meant antenna pattern).
>
>
>
> [he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd
> party listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)
>
>
>
> I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and
> consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with
> the launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He
> indicated that I could not do that, I told him to just watch me.
>
>
>
> He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued
> dialog.  I repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I
> finally had to hang up on him .
>
>


-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-11 Thread Craig Schmaderer
Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready!  I want now!



From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and PCTel/Maxrad via 
executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that, since I had experience 
with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not comment further since this 
list is public and I don't want to get sued.  I will note that if I remember 
correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was 
evident in his dealings with coworkers.


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year at their 
request due to their deal with Earthlink)

I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.

[he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:


  1.  WB is taking advantage of Motorola.
  2.  WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!)
  3.  WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars.
  4.  Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty.
  5.  Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger.
  6.  (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw a 
waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).

[he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)

I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.

He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  I 
repeated multiple times, "please remove me from the website".  I finally had to 
hang up on him .


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-11 Thread Ken Hohhof
I seem to remember there was a connection between Motorola and PCTel/Maxrad via 
executive Marty Singer.  I was shocked when I saw that, since I had experience 
with Mr. Singer when I was at Tellabs.  I will not comment further since this 
list is public and I don’t want to get sued.  I will note that if I remember 
correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was 
evident in his dealings with coworkers.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year at their 
request due to their deal with Earthlink)

 

I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.

 

[he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:

 

1.  WB is taking advantage of Motorola. 
2.  WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!) 
3.  WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars. 
4.  Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty. 
5.  Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger. 
6.  (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw 
a waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).

 

[he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)

 

I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.

 

He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  I 
repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I finally had to 
hang up on him .



Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-11 Thread Chuck McCown
Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had 
with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be 
listed on their third party website.  (I held H pol for over a year at 
their request due to their deal with Earthlink)
   
  I told him that the meager amount of traffic we get from the web site is not 
worth the royalty.  And again rehearsed the points of the . . . . . . email.



  [he] then gave me a litany of particulars that I found offensive and for the 
most part erroneous as listed below:



a.. WB is taking advantage of Motorola. 
b.. WB currently gets all advantages that Cascade gets.  (Oh, Really!) 
c.. WB too small to get same deal as MTI, Maxrad and Mars. 
d.. Maxrad, MTI and Mars pay zero royalty. 
e.. Motorola does not trust or suspects our data on our 900 MHz stinger. 
f.. (He said the wave form might not be accurate and how could we just draw 
a waveform like that.  They cannot believe the waveform.  I presume he meant 
antenna pattern).


  [he] said Mot was talking to Equinox about getting FCC approval and 3rd party 
listings.  (Equinox is a competitor of WB as is Mars, Maxrad and MTI)



  I told [him] to please remove our listing from the Motorola web site and 
consider the agreement terminated.  I told him that we were proceeding with the 
launch of all products including H pol on all frequencies.  He indicated that I 
could not do that, I told him to just watch me.



  He would not terminate the call and continued to press for continued dialog.  
I repeated multiple times, “please remove me from the website”.  I finally had 
to hang up on him .


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread David Milholen

Negative,

Notice the green ports in the front for making your direct connections 
to a DC source.


This design works well for us since all of our sites now have a 29v and 
48v supply system.


When we add one of these to an older site for upgrade we will leave the 
cmm4 for the 29v gear


and install the cmm5 for the newer 450i/m gear. As we swap out older 450 
gear to 450i or M we will


just add more controller modules. Which is much less than paying another 
1800+ for a whole cmm4 or ctm2


I have one site that has 3 cmm4 and the 3rd is only using one port.

Keep in mind the idea is to move to more capacity at your own pace 
without going back every 6months to upgrade.


All ports are gige with built in surge on each port. The CTM2 or the 
Cmm4 has never failed me on protection.




On 1/10/2017 5:16 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:

Is that it's power supply hanging off of the back?

On 1/10/2017 5:14 PM, Dave wrote:
Thats all there is that I could find or get at this time. I am sure 
more to follow.



On 01/10/2017 12:14 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
Through online chat I asked Cambium the other day for a spec sheet.  
All they gave me was the quick start guide.

Attached.

On 1/10/2017 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5.

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it 
will not pass certain specs.


But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge 
suppressors as the first line of defense.


If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade 
performance.


*From:*Ken Hohhof

*Sent:*Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM

*To:*<mailto:af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com

*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec 
sheet.  David, can you post a photo of your setup?


It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a 
separate controller, plus a UGPS? Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from 
LMG which is 8 ports with integral controller.


Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, 
in 1U rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?


You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge 
protection like the CTM2? Downside would be frying a whole $1000 
unit if it takes a hit.  If you still use a separate surge 
protector, like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf modules, does the double 
surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?


The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 
450i/450m, as well as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever 
power supply you connect to the module?  As opposed to generating 
the appropriate voltages internally from the 48V input?


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of 
products to go with it.


Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at 
the base or control point.


Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity 
within highly dense areas.


Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design 
and stackable ports for up to


32 controlled ports from one controller.

On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net>
wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh

--
imap://installe...@imap.foxvalley.net:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E80429?header=quotebody=1.1.2=image001.jpg





--




--


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread Josh Reynolds
Cambium would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling
kids!

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m
>
>
>
> All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it will
> not pass certain specs.
>
>
>
> But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge suppressors as
> the first line of defense.
>
> If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade
> performance.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ken Hohhof
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m
>
>
>
> Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec sheet.
> David, can you post a photo of your setup?
>
>
>
> It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate
> controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 8
> ports with integral controller.
>
>
>
> Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, in 1U
> rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?
>
>
>
> You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge
> protection like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 unit if
> it takes a hit.  If you still use a separate surge protector, like maybe
> Chuck’s APC shelf modules, does the double surge protector degrade Ethernet
> performance?
>
>
>
> The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 450i/450m, as
> well as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever power supply you
> connect to the module?  As opposed to generating the appropriate voltages
> internally from the 48V input?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *David Milholen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m
>
>
>
> If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products
> to go with it.
>
> Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the
> base or control point.
>
> Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within
> highly dense areas.
>
> Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design and
> stackable ports for up to
>
> 32 controlled ports from one controller.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:
>
> No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
>
> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
>
> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office
>
> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell
>
> jbroadw...@converge-tech.com
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net> wrote:
>
> Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> --
> [image: cid:image001.jpg@01D26B2F.ED944D80]
>


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread David Milholen

Ken,

 I have not fully reviewed the specs but from what I gather the voltage 
is passive and the 29v has to have 29v supply.


This gives it a more segmented service that is deserved by the cambium 
gear connected to it. I like the idea of no moving


parts. I have always been a Mil-spec kind of person because when working 
in the elements I have seen what happens to even the most hardened gear 
in the most extreme environments.


I have seen what happens to a guyed tower after 30yrs of service. Shear 
vibration of the guy wires can break down the joints from where they 
connect. Metal begins to thin due to rust no matter


how good the galvy coat is.



On 1/10/2017 5:32 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


Thanks, that explains a lot.  So the controller exists.  And it can go 
side-by-side with an injector.


And that�s quite a honkin� heat sink.  So it�s more than 1U high.  Do 
you think it generates regulated 56V (or 29.5V for the other version) 
from 48V in?  If not, why the big heat sink?  To be able to power 450m?


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Dave
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 5:13 PM
*To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] 450m

see attached..
�they are a bit pricey but no more than a CTM2 fully loaded.
The difference is support for the 450m and other 450i devices as well 
as its modular
some site may not need more than 4 control points some of mine require 
12 or more
but those are sitting on cmm4s with only hopes of ever reaching 100Mb 
port speed.
I will be able to add to this design without buying a whole ctm2 or 
cmm4 just one module at a

time. So, there is some money saved by this design for new deployments.
The cambium gige Surge or lpu� depending on which radio I am using 
will get an external protection near the

radio. Depending on cable runs we will add one near the entry ports.



 Forwarded Message 

*Date: *



Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:06:13 -0600

*From: *



Dave <dmilho...@wletc.com> <mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>

*To: *



davidm <dav...@wletc.com> <mailto:dav...@wletc.com>

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


--


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread Ken Hohhof
Thanks, that explains a lot.  So the controller exists.  And it can go
side-by-side with an injector.

 

And that’s quite a honkin’ heat sink.  So it’s more than 1U high.  Do you
think it generates regulated 56V (or 29.5V for the other version) from 48V
in?  If not, why the big heat sink?  To be able to power 450m?

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 5:13 PM
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 450m

 

see attached..
�they are a bit pricey but no more than a CTM2 fully loaded. 
The difference is support for the 450m and other 450i devices as well as its
modular 
some site may not need more than 4 control points some of mine require 12 or
more
but those are sitting on cmm4s with only hopes of ever reaching 100Mb port
speed.
I will be able to add to this design without buying a whole ctm2 or cmm4
just one module at a
time. So, there is some money saved by this design for new deployments.
The cambium gige Surge or lpu� depending on which radio I am using will
get an external protection near the 
radio. Depending on cable runs we will add one near the entry ports.





 Forwarded Message  


Date: 

Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:06:13 -0600


From: 

Dave  <mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com> <dmilho...@wletc.com>


To: 

davidm  <mailto:dav...@wletc.com> <dav...@wletc.com>

 

 
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
 


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread Brian Sullivan

Is that it's power supply hanging off of the back?

On 1/10/2017 5:14 PM, Dave wrote:
Thats all there is that I could find or get at this time. I am sure 
more to follow.



On 01/10/2017 12:14 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
Through online chat I asked Cambium the other day for a spec sheet.  
All they gave me was the quick start guide.

Attached.

On 1/10/2017 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5.

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it 
will not pass certain specs.


But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge 
suppressors as the first line of defense.


If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade 
performance.


*From:*Ken Hohhof

*Sent:*Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM

*To:*<mailto:af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com

*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec 
sheet.  David, can you post a photo of your setup?


It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate 
controller, plus a UGPS? Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 
8 ports with integral controller.


Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, 
in 1U rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?


You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge 
protection like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 
unit if it takes a hit.  If you still use a separate surge 
protector, like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf modules, does the double 
surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?


The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 
450i/450m, as well as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever 
power supply you connect to the module?  As opposed to generating 
the appropriate voltages internally from the 48V input?


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of 
products to go with it.


Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at 
the base or control point.


Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity 
within highly dense areas.


Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design 
and stackable ports for up to


32 controlled ports from one controller.

On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net>
wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh

--
imap://installe...@imap.foxvalley.net:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E80429?header=quotebody=1.1.2=image001.jpg





--




Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread Dave
Thats all there is that I could find or get at this time. I am sure more 
to follow.



On 01/10/2017 12:14 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
Through online chat I asked Cambium the other day for a spec sheet.  
All they gave me was the quick start guide.

Attached.

On 1/10/2017 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5.

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it 
will not pass certain specs.


But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge suppressors 
as the first line of defense.


If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade 
performance.


*From:*Ken Hohhof

*Sent:*Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM

*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>

*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec 
sheet.  David, can you post a photo of your setup?


It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate 
controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers. Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 
8 ports with integral controller.


Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, in 
1U rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?


You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge 
protection like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 
unit if it takes a hit.  If you still use a separate surge protector, 
like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf modules, does the double surge protector 
degrade Ethernet performance?


The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 450i/450m, 
as well as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever power supply 
you connect to the module?  As opposed to generating the appropriate 
voltages internally from the 48V input?


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of 
products to go with it.


Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at 
the base or control point.


Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within 
highly dense areas.


Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design 
and stackable ports for up to


32 controlled ports from one controller.

On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net
<mailto:j...@velociter.net>> wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh

--
imap://installe...@imap.foxvalley.net:143/fetch%3EUID%3E.INBOX%3E80429?header=quotebody=1.1.2=image001.jpg





--


Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread chuck
All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it will not 
pass certain specs.  

But you need replicable/expendable  robust external surge suppressors as the 
first line of defense.  
If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade performance.  

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec sheet.  David, 
can you post a photo of your setup?

 

It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate 
controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 8 ports 
with integral controller.

 

Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, in 1U 
rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?

 

You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge protection 
like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 unit if it takes a hit.  
If you still use a separate surge protector, like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf 
modules, does the double surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?

 

The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 450i/450m, as well 
as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever power supply you connect to 
the module?  As opposed to generating the appropriate voltages internally from 
the 48V input?

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products to go 
with it.

Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the base or 
control point.

Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within highly 
dense areas.

Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design and 
stackable ports for up to

32 controlled ports from one controller.

 

 

On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

  No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

  Jeff Broadwick 

  ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

  312-205-2519 Office

  574-220-7826 Cell

  jbroadw...@converge-tech.com


  On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net> wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

 

Thanks,

Josh

 

-- 



Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread Ken Hohhof
Looks like a stealth product.  Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec sheet.  David, 
can you post a photo of your setup?

 

It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate 
controller, plus a UGPS?  Wowzers.  Compare to CTM2 from LMG which is 8 ports 
with integral controller.

 

Can you get 2 of the 4-port modules, or 1 module and a controller, in 1U 
rackmount?  Are you using the controller?  Does it exist yet?

 

You mention surge protection, does that mean it has integral surge protection 
like the CTM2?  Downside would be frying a whole $1000 unit if it takes a hit.  
If you still use a separate surge protector, like maybe Chuck’s APC shelf 
modules, does the double surge protector degrade Ethernet performance?

 

The compatibility chart show it can work with 56V APs like 450i/450m, as well 
as 29V APs like 450.  I’m assuming it’s whatever power supply you connect to 
the module?  As opposed to generating the appropriate voltages internally from 
the 48V input?

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products to go 
with it.

Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the base or 
control point.

Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within highly 
dense areas.

Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design and 
stackable ports for up to

32 controlled ports from one controller.

 

 

On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick 

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com> 


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net 
<mailto:j...@velociter.net> > wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

 

Thanks,

Josh

 

-- 




Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2017-01-10 Thread David Milholen
If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products 
to go with it.


Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the 
base or control point.


Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within 
highly dense areas.


Just got our first one in yesterday and love the new modular design and 
stackable ports for up to


32 controlled ports from one controller.



On 12/30/2016 9:33 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com 

On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide > wrote:



Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh



--


Re: [AFMUG] 450M and 5.4ghz?

2017-01-04 Thread Sean Heskett
As soon as the FCC grants approval.  Which should be "soon".

If I were a betting man I'd say 1-2 months.

-Sean


On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:02 PM Sam Lambie  wrote:

> When is it slated to operate in the 5.4 band?
>
>
> --
> --
> *Sam Lambie*
>
>
> Taosnet Wireless Tech.
>
>
> 575-758-7598 Office
>
>
> www.Taosnet.com 
>
>
>


[AFMUG] 450M and 5.4ghz?

2017-01-04 Thread Sam Lambie
When is it slated to operate in the 5.4 band?


-- 
-- 
*Sam Lambie*
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com 


Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

2016-12-30 Thread Ken Hohhof
Is that the “grounding gland” same as on the LPU kits we used to use for
PTP400/500/600?  Look in your junk pile and you might have a bunch of those
glands that came with the LPU kits.  I installed most of them indoors or in
cabinets and didn’t use the premade jumpers with glands that came with them.

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

 

Yeah, those aren't perfect, but they work. Glad those worked for you too.
Took me like 3 hours of scouring catalogs to find those. I was initially
searching for a plastic PG16, but you have to have the short base threads
like Cambium's version or it will run into the circuit board on a 450i. Not
sure about 450m, but I'm guessing it's similar.

On 12/30/2016 2:43 PM, Darren Shea wrote:

I bought 10 of these the other day:
http://www.newark.com/lapp-kabel/52015810/cable-clamp-gland/dp/19M8609

�

They are shorter, and the rubber bushing inside has a bigger hole, so
we�ll need to work harder to seal it, but it is a heck of a lot cheaper
than the official Cambium gland.

�

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Heide
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 9:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

�

What are you guys using for a secondary cable gland for the 450m. I am not
looking to pay $300 for a 10 pack through a a cambium vendor for part #
N65L033A.

�

Thanks,

Josh

 



Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

2016-12-30 Thread George Skorup
Yeah, those aren't perfect, but they work. Glad those worked for you 
too. Took me like 3 hours of scouring catalogs to find those. I was 
initially searching for a plastic PG16, but you have to have the short 
base threads like Cambium's version or it will run into the circuit 
board on a 450i. Not sure about 450m, but I'm guessing it's similar.


On 12/30/2016 2:43 PM, Darren Shea wrote:


I bought 10 of these the other day: 
http://www.newark.com/lapp-kabel/52015810/cable-clamp-gland/dp/19M8609


They are shorter, and the rubber bushing inside has a bigger hole, so 
we�ll need to work harder to seal it, but it is a heck of a lot 
cheaper than the official Cambium gland.


*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Joshua Heide
*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 9:53 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

What are you guys using for a secondary cable gland for the 450m. I am 
not looking to pay $300 for a 10 pack through a a cambium vendor for 
part # N65L033A.


Thanks,

Josh





Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

2016-12-30 Thread Darren Shea
I bought 10 of these the other day:
http://www.newark.com/lapp-kabel/52015810/cable-clamp-gland/dp/19M8609

 

They are shorter, and the rubber bushing inside has a bigger hole, so we'll
need to work harder to seal it, but it is a heck of a lot cheaper than the
official Cambium gland.

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Heide
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 9:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

 

What are you guys using for a secondary cable gland for the 450m. I am not
looking to pay $300 for a 10 pack through a a cambium vendor for part #
N65L033A.

 

Thanks,

Josh



Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2016-12-30 Thread Bill Prince
You Illinois guys get dense rain. On the west coast, we see maybe 3-4 db 
fade on a 10 mile link in the worst rain.


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/30/2016 8:52 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


450i and 450m do not.

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Joshua Heide
*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it 
for long term use but just getting started is fine.


Thanks,

Josh

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick 
- Lists

*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 7:34 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net 
<mailto:j...@velociter.net>> wrote:


Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh





Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2016-12-30 Thread Bill Prince
I suspect that the metal case really makes GPS reception a problem. They 
could mount the antenna externally I suppose, but OTOH, you'd like to 
use one GPS source per site. Putting a GPS receiver in every radio flies 
in the face of the single-source problem.



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 12/30/2016 8:52 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:


450i and 450m do not.

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Joshua Heide
*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it 
for long term use but just getting started is fine.


Thanks,

Josh

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick 
- Lists

*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 7:34 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net 
<mailto:j...@velociter.net>> wrote:


Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

Thanks,

Josh





Re: [AFMUG] 450m

2016-12-30 Thread Ken Hohhof
450i and 450m do not.

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Heide
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it for long 
term use but just getting started is fine.

 

Thanks,

Josh

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

 

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source.

Jeff Broadwick

ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

312-205-2519 Office

574-220-7826 Cell

jbroadw...@converge-tech.com <mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com> 


On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide <j...@velociter.net 
<mailto:j...@velociter.net> > wrote:

Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone used it?

 

Thanks,

Josh



  1   2   3   4   >