Re: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
FAQ On 3/5/03 5:48, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4 Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us change our domain name from London_city to londoncity without the underscore. This is to avoid any future DNS problems. The idea is to phase out the NT domain after moving all our servers to the new win2k domain. Thanks for your help _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange NAV crash diag
Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up... On 3/5/03 9:16, Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'm looking for some assistance. Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log, life went: 45 - Scan Engine Failure. HRESULT = 0x80004005. This error occurred while scanning the attachment play.exe of message unknown located in unknown. 68 - Unable to initialize Scan Engine. The virus definitions may be missing or corrupt. Perform a LiveUpdate to retrieve the latest virus defintions. 110 - The process navesp.exe failed to start (0xC009008A). 167 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE terminated unexpectedly. 168 - The process NAVECTRL.EXE was restarted. 68, 110, 167, 168, 68, 110, 167, ... This goes on until the app log fills up -- then the machine started to beep. The beeps were rapid enough that I couldn't login (no real keyboard response) so I connected to the machine from my desktop, stopped the exchange and NAV services. I tried a remote shutdown (PSTOOLS and my own app that calles the API) but no luck -- finally I hit the reset button -- ugh! OK, machine comes back up, I resize app logs and bring the machine down and up normally. By the time I'm back up and running it's 3:50. OK, life goes on... At 4:38 I get 2 X.400 entries Info first, warning second: 270 - A permanent error has occurred with Entity /O=TECH SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=CONFIGURATION/CN=SERVERS/CN=EX1/CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB. Entity is a Message Object is a Normal Priority Message. Object: 0633. Message ID: C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD Content length: 3381, External Trace information (first 100 bytes) = 308063806180130255536280130120130D5465636820536F6674776172653180 800D3033303330343231333831375A82010083020600, PDU dump reference 1 [MTA SUBMIT 15 74] (14) And 290 - A non-delivery report (reason code transfer-failure and diagnostic code undeliverable-mail-recipient-deceased) is being generated for message C=us;A= ;P=tech software;L=EX10303042138GJTJN7LD. It was originally destined for DN:/o=TECH SOFTWARE/ou=TECH/cn=CONFIGURATION/cn=SERVERS/cn=EX1/cn=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB§DDA:EX=/O=TECH SOFTWARE/OU=TECH/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=INTERNET DOMAIN ADMIN599E3495599E3495599E349577EE8281045431; (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 19 136] (12) And life goes on... At 5:10 DrWatson reports: The application, store.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 03/04/2003 @ 17:10:20.734 The exception generated was c005 at address 77FCBB23 (RtlFreeHeap) STORE CRASHES I look at services, sure enough store is down, and IMC is on it's way down. Lots of later messages from IMC, SA, and ES about unexpected errors -- probably because store isn't there. G I restart Store and restart IMC, log playbacks go ok and I appear good at this point. Ideas? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572, it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is actually the Mx record for that domain. On 3/5/03 9:38, Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into mail.xx.com 25 When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, 572 Relay not authorized Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Try telnetting to post 25... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Yes, here is what I get.. Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on port 23: Connect failed I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Gregory Householder Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on retrying and saying connection was dropped by remote host. Is there anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Well, their Mx record points to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net, which seems to accept mail for the domain in question. Connected to mail-fwd.ameritech-hosting.net. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net SMTP RS ver 1.0.63s helo foo.bar 250 mail10b.sbc-webhosting.net Hello 216.30.136.98 [216.30.136.98], I'm listening mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender ok rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient ok quit On 3/5/03 11:19, Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The domain name is rsaarchitects.com if that will help. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572, it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is actually the Mx record for that domain. On 3/5/03 9:38, Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did that after sending the last email. It gives me the same error from multiple internet connections when I try using telnet into mail.xx.com 25 When I try telnet xx.com 25 it says, 572 Relay not authorized Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Try telnetting to post 25... -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain Yes, here is what I get.. Connecting To mail.xxx.com...Could not open a connection to host on port 23: Connect failed I can email them from my home account without any problems though. And when I try to telnet I get the same error from home. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Gregory Householder Subject: RE: Problems Emailing one Domain I have a problem email one domain. They can receive emails from everyone else outside my domain and we can send to everyone outside my domain except for this one domain. In my SMTP queue it just keeps on retrying and saying connection was dropped by remote host. Is there anything on my side that could be causing this problem? Have you tried a manual telnet session to that domain's mail server to see what the actual error is? -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA responses to attempt such a thing. Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses, especially when working with known domains. (e.g. Dell in Austin or government workers for the City of Detroit) Still, though unlikely to occur we generally don't change our home answering machines to reflect that we are going to be out of town either. On 3/5/03 11:37, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. Cheers, Allison On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the following: Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MAC Outlook client errors
http://is.curtin.edu.au/help/hfiles/hfile01.htm Conversion failure of attachment, resulting in undeliverable messages If an Office document attached to an email message has been edited and saved while attached to the message, the message may be returned undeliverable when sent to a user external to Exchange via the Internet Mail Connector. The following error message will be generated: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: email and fax (Sent by senders name) 09:55 Sent: 29/08/2001 12:54 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 29/08/2001 12:55 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=AU;a= ;p=CURTIN;l=EXMSB04-010829045428Z-12491 MSEXCH:IMS:CURTIN:BENTLEY:EXMSB01 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed There is no problem if the message is sent to recipients within the Exchange environment: it only occurs when the message is processed by the Exchange Internet Mail Connector. The problem will also occur on a PC if a message which was generated in the above circumstances is sent to a PC user and that user forwards the message to a recipient via the Exchange IMC. The work around for this problem is: Users should only attach finished, saved documents to email messages. Always save attachments to disk before editing, and reattach to message after saving changes. On 3/5/03 12:17, The Geek Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just added a E2K system into an existing 5.5 site. Same routing groups. When I moved the mailboxes to the E2K system, MAC Outlook users sometimes get this error. After a resend some of them go through, some NEVER do. None on the MS Outlook users do get this error ever. These are to outside SMTP addresses, not internal. Internal never fails. Is the a good place for MAC Outlook info?, MS site is not it! Why are the MAC clients getting this. Kurt, any clue about this error message? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: FW: BASMC Baylor Health 0503 Sent: Today, 5:07 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Ted McAfee (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed Lauren Law (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed Quay Lutrell (E-mail) on Today, 5:10 PM The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=mcpub;l=EX2K-030304000713Z-1386 MSEXCH:IMS:mcpub:mail:MAIL 0x80070057 (00050311) Conversion to Internet format failed _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop. I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them actually happening is extremely low. On 3/5/03 13:14, Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary reply to every message rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged unique messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Limits [was Re: OOO...]
Possibly an offshoot of the inability to accurately report mailbox sizes over 2GB in the UI? On 3/5/03 14:24, Matt Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would you really want to have a user synching a 2 GB file over a 56k dial-up line... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrade problem 5.5 2k
Ah... Forgot to run NTDSNoMatch eh? You can disconnect a mailbox and connect it to another. Then disconnect the disabled mailbox enabled user account which has your mailbox and connect it to your own. On 3/5/03 19:43, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone seems to be fine except me. The problem is that it pointed my user to a different mailbox. This mailbox is just for daily delivery of data files so no one else is affected. But, it gave me its e-mail address and alias, everything but the logon name. The account that I got now has no e-mail address. This I can fix but how can I get my mailbox back? Or am I screwed? The original 5.5 server got the upgrade so everything should be there but how can I link back to it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail routing question
This is done on the SMTP virtual server. Out of the box, only authenticated users are allowed to relay. You can allow an IP or group of IPs to relay on the relay restrictions button I believe. On 3/5/03 21:20, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that no one could route mail other than my internal network. But at the same time I was able to have a computer in another state on a different network connect and send an e-mail to everyone on our network at all was fine, everyone got the e-mail from the computer out of state. But as soon as I added an outside address to the list of our internal addresses the entire message would fail with relaying restricted. But I was able to add that particular domain as a always relay list. So at this point if anyone tried to relay and had any domains listed that were not either my local domain or the one domain listed it would fail and all was well. How do I do that on 2k? I am in a real bind here. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Looking for Outlook productivity book
I found this to be fairly useful... http://www.davidco.com/products.php http://www.davidco.com/productDetail.php?id=43IDoption=9SID=55ce07dfb7c781 2cb4303fac4fdae315 Of course like any system, working it is the most important component. On 3/4/03 8:25, Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for a book that talks about how to setup and use Outlook, and all of it's features, in a way that maximizes time management and personal productivity. Does anyone know if such a book exists? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via another IMS at another company Which logs are these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
What do the event logs say? On 3/4/03 9:38, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step? Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via another IMS at another company Which logs are these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server
I believe you've gained additional information for the 'things not to do in Exchange' list. Sorry. :( On 3/3/03 22:43, Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000 Server http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170 Is there any tricks or workaround to move an exchange server 2000 to a different admin group ? By mistake our ex2k server has been installed in the wrong admin group. The Goal of that was to be able to delegate some administrative task to an Admin only to that ex 2000 server. And protect the other ex2k server... We want to avoid having to reinstall the ex2k server if possible... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moved Mailboxes not acting right
DNS configuration problem? On 3/3/03 8:03, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added a new server to our site, I moved Mailboxes to it and now it appears that those mailboxes are only able to send and receive messages to people that are on their Server. After about 12 hours I get a message stating: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. I've done mailbox moves before and never had this issue, anyone got any ideas? Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange Server 2000 SP3 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA
Install and SSL certificate. Map port 443 on the external firewall interface to the internal IP address of the intranet server. Assign a DNS name to the external IP address if one doesn't already exist for it. Connect to https://dns_name/exchange On 2/28/03 6:14, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks. My network is an nt domain but I hope to migrate to windows 2000 soon. I run exchange 5.5 on an NT4 box with OWA installed on our intranet server. This server is a windows 2000 box. To access mailbox via OWA users have to do three things. 1 Open a dial up connection to any ISP 2 run a program called symantec to create a VPN tunnel via the internet 3 connect to the following address Http://server19/exchange. Server19 being our intranet server hosting OWA. What we now want to achieve is to eliminate the second step and make it possible for users to access their mail from any computer without installing symantec vpn. Can anyone help with the steps to achieve this. The setup of my network is as follows Internal network with all the servers including exchange server and intranet server to the left. The Symantec raptor firewall in the middle and the internet to the right. Thanks a million. __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Send on behalf of
The phrasing of the question and terms used based on the question as asked are ambiguous. Delegate permissions is sufficient for 'send on behalf of' rights, if that checkbox is marked. Send As permissions are another set of permissions and can only be granted via the Exchange admin. On 2/28/03 11:46, Nikki Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that this is true. Delegate permission is sufficient for send as rights. (You don't even need to give them any specific permissions, in fact you could give them none permissions on all folders, and by virtue of their name being present in the Delegates window they will be able to Send As that entity.) Nikki -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send on behalf of You need to give them Send As permissions from Exch Admin -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 SP 4.0 I am setting up a mailbox that people will need to add to their folder list. They will need to then reply from that mailbox. I have set these people as delegates to the new mailbox and granted them Editor permissions to all folders. When these people go to reply, they get you do not have permissions to send on behalf... This doesn't work like I want to... I do not want to make people co-owners of the mailbox as that is too much security.. What am I missing here? Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused.. In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it. On 2/28/03 15:31, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are tired of seeing the will you allow dialog box and want to put a .dll in their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if anyone had installed this and if there are any pitfalls I need to avoid. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
On 2/28/03 17:40, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this then... http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm I'm aware of the functionality, but have not implemented it (and don't plan to). I much prefer the use of redemption, since it can get around all of the possible prompts AFAIK and isn't limited to just the XP client. The server based forms work with Exchange (all versions) and OpenMail I believe. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help With LDAP Query
On 2/28/03 17:38, Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a query that looks like this for use with RBDL: LDAP://mtvex00/o=TestOrg;(((objectClass=organizationalPerson))(postalAddre ss =OverThere)(!givenName=CR*));cn,adspath;subtree Now then, this works fine to add people to a DL. However, if I go in and manually add an organizationalPerson who's postalAddress=OverThere, and who's givenName does = CR*, it is not being removed. Any ideas? RBDL is inherently unreliable when it comes to removing addresses from lists (see archives for a bunch of my posts on using the product .. Somewhere in late 1999 I think). When I used it, I ran a script to remove all members from the list first, immediately followed by running RBDL to rebuild the DL. Used it each night around 2AM and there was a window of 20 minutes or so where the DLs were a bit in flux, hence the 2AM run time. AFAIK that script is still running at the company where I installed it and building the DLs nightly. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Two email addresses - How to swap without using ExchangeAdmin ?
Have them send as the second account using a client configured with the secondary SMTP address (e.g. OE). Create a web form to allow them to send. On 2/27/03 3:10, Andrew Hedges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We are in the process of migrating a third party from Notes 5 to Exchange 5.5. As part of the migration, the users will need to be able to send emails from DomainX.com as well as DomainY.com for some time. I have had a play with the email addresses and although I can set multiple email addresses that a user can use, they can only send on the Address that is set as the 'Reply-To' Address within the Exchange Administrator. I have tried using the 'From' field and entering the other email address for the user, but it just resolves the name and sends as the 'Reply-To' email address. Is there any other way around this, short of giving our users two email boxes on the server and telling them to switch between the two? Any ideas gratefully appreciated, as I have to go live this weekend! Many thanks, Andrew Hedges Senior Network Analyst UnumProvident DDI: 01306 873449 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Health Insurance Awards 2002 - voted by Advisers - Most Innovative New Product for Elixia 123 - Best Group Income Protection Provider for an unprecedented fifth year running! Visit our website at http://www.unumprovident.co.uk -Confidentiality Notice- This Communication and the information it contains:- (a) Is intended only for the person(s) or organisation(s) named above and for no other person(s) or organisation(s) (b) May be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please contact us immediately by email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global address book
Use restricted address book views. On 2/27/03 6:14, Vas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all Quick question, I have added another Recipients group in Exchange 5.5. Is there anyway to exclude these mailbox's/users from the Global Address list Cheers Vas Constantinou MCP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA and forwarding attachments
No version of Outlook (nor do most mail clients) support the inclusion of the attachment in replies. When you forward a message with an attachment what behavior do you see? On 2/27/03 7:04, Elmerick, Ralph H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that OWA supports the sending and receiving of attachments ( Oh yea, Exchange 5.5 SP4) however does it support the forwarding of an attachment. In other words if a user has received an attachment in an email and then the user replies to the message for forwards the message on to another Exchange mailbox should OWA support that and send that attachment onto the forwarded user. If so then there is a bug and I need to fix it. Thanks. Ralph H. Elmerick NT/Exchange Administrator 330-471-3409 ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Setting Mailbox Rights via LDAP.
Crmb-s.zip http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm On 2/27/03 7:37, Cartier, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order to create mailboxes, I set LDAP attributes in ADS, relying on RUS that actually creates the mailboxes. Only, it seems that the Mailbox Rights are not set correctly when the Mailbox gets created. The SELF permissions are missing. Does anyone know what LDAP attribute has to be set when creating a new Mailbox, or how to change these rights with LDAP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Forged headers using my domain
You can change domains or add additional domains to individual users mailboxes but there's nothing that will stop anyone who wanted to from forging mail as coming from your domain if they like. This is the nature of SMTP. On 2/27/03 8:02, Dave Vantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Several weeks ago I posted a problem I was having with NDR's bouncing back to bogus random email accounts in my domain (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) These are coming from a variety of advertisers and I have been grouping them as they arrive and there are currently 12 different organizations. Because they are all different I believe that some bulk email company is handling the mail for these companies. Today one our consultants forwarded me this email. I am not sending out email to this address... I have got a couple of these just yesterday. Could someone be sending stuff using my account as a starting point? Me -Original Message- From: Mail Administrator To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/26/2003 9:18 PM Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the addresses and re-mail the message): SMTP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you feel this message to be in error. ATT11670.TXT (ADV)time share Someone now seems to be doing bulk emailing but now using a legitimate address from our domain. This is getting to the point of being ridiculous. Any spammer, it would seem, can take any legitimate address and begin an email campaign and let that domain worry about any of the bounces as well as disgruntled users receiving the email and thinking it was from us. If we decide to change our email domain to something else can both old and new email addresses be resolved to a single individual/mailbox for some period of time then drop the one being used by bulk mailers. I am also in the midst of upgrading to AD in order to move to E2k so am unclear of all the impact this may have. Also is there anything that can be done to try to mitigate this issue in the future. Thanks -Dave Vantine _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failed delivery
Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR... On 2/27/03 8:49, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, We have a situation where exchange 5.5 users are subscribed to a list as supplied by a unix listmanager. When a message is sent to this list, there are 240 members, there always seem to be a number of failures, which appear to be random. Any ideas why? I have looked for events in the logs after switching on all logging for mta, is, transport etc, but nothing useful. They are not over their mailbox limit, they do not all have inbox rules, so I am baffled. Ex5.5 sp4 plus fixes, NT 4etc thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Failed delivery
What do SMTP logging and message tracking on the Exchange server indicate? On 2/27/03 9:09, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a problem because there aren't any being received. Tests from the list server machine indicate a positive helo and response, so no obvious smtp problem!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 February 2003 15:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Failed delivery Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR... On 2/27/03 8:49, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, We have a situation where exchange 5.5 users are subscribed to a list as supplied by a unix listmanager. When a message is sent to this list, there are 240 members, there always seem to be a number of failures, which appear to be random. Any ideas why? I have looked for events in the logs after switching on all logging for mta, is, transport etc, but nothing useful. They are not over their mailbox limit, they do not all have inbox rules, so I am baffled. Ex5.5 sp4 plus fixes, NT 4etc thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change Even default
If you edit the items being imported, you can set their time to busy. On 2/27/03 12:56, Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I could find. Under the calendar options all I have is Show week numbers in the date Navigator, use Microsoft Schedule+ as my primary calendar - grayed out, and Always use local Calendar. Then I can change the back color. When I choose add holidays' I do not get any options to select it just imports them. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default I believe you can change the holidays' import properties before you import them to do that, can't you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default Sorry that was not through enough. When you create an event on the calendar you can show your time as free, busy, tentative, or out of office. It defaults to free. Well I am trying to get it to default to busy. Reason being I am trying to get all the holidays to show time as busy. It would be a big pain to go through the calendar and click on the event and then show the time as busy. Although I could probably be done doing that by now. :-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default Say what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Even default Outlook 2k sp1 Is it possible to change the default show time from Free to Busy? TIA, Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change Even default
http://www.slipstick.com/dev/olforms/holiday.htm On 2/27/03 13:25, Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You wouldn't by any chance know of a link that would show how to set the time to busy would you? What fields mean what in the text file? I see subject being the first field, start and end date the second field. I tried to put in Busy in the third but that didn't work. I have looked at MS site and did a google search. TIA, Brett -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Change Even default If you edit the items being imported, you can set their time to busy. On 2/27/03 12:56, Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I could find. Under the calendar options all I have is Show week numbers in the date Navigator, use Microsoft Schedule+ as my primary calendar - grayed out, and Always use local Calendar. Then I can change the back color. When I choose add holidays' I do not get any options to select it just imports them. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default I believe you can change the holidays' import properties before you import them to do that, can't you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default Sorry that was not through enough. When you create an event on the calendar you can show your time as free, busy, tentative, or out of office. It defaults to free. Well I am trying to get it to default to busy. Reason being I am trying to get all the holidays to show time as busy. It would be a big pain to go through the calendar and click on the event and then show the time as busy. Although I could probably be done doing that by now. :-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Even default Say what? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Even default Outlook 2k sp1 Is it possible to change the default show time from Free to Busy? TIA, Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved in health care, patient information is not a priority. Nice that it is in your organization, but yours is the exception rather than the rule I assure you. Think insurance companies care about patient confidentiality? Hell, they don't even care about patients. Security second to the pentagon? Perhaps taking a page from their book and setting up public and private networks initially would have solved these types of issues. If protecting patient data had been a priority from the get go, I'd expect this would already be in place. Instead, maintaining that confidentiality was an idea given lip service to while measures were put in place which were known to trade off security for expediency. As noble as your organization's intentions are, a thimble full of wine in a barrel of sewer water, still gets you a barrel of sewer water. That's why extremely restrictive regulations were enacted. On 2/26/03 7:19, Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I take exception to your comments in your second paragraph that the reality is that companies don't really care about protecting patient data. I work in a hospital and have met many people from other hospitals through seminars, meetings, etc. To say that we don't care is patently false. Patient confidentiality is a priority, second only to patient care. Our hospital has zero tolerance for PHI disclosure. A nurse blabs to someone about a patient and boom! she's fired. I know, I've seen it happen. The trouble with HIPAA is that they seem to want hospitals and healthcare organizations to be almost as secure as the Pentagon. Our administration hired a big name outfit to give their recomendations. I had to read through 23 documents from them. And some of them, the suggestions, were insane. One suggested (although it said it was optional) searching all purses and bags that patients or visitors to the hospital. I guess they're afraid someone would sneak in a floppy to be used to copy patient data. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403 http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403 , but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
I don't doubt that one of your company's biggest priorities now is regulatory compliance as it relates to the protection of patient information. If those involved in the health care industry had really been concerned about protecting this data for the sake of the patients themselves, wouldn't the safeguards already be in place? On 2/26/03 10:27, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I work for a Insurance company. One of our biggest priorities is the protection of patient information. Don't generalize a whole industry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved in health care, patient information is not a priority. Nice that it is in your organization, but yours is the exception rather than the rule I assure you. Think insurance companies care about patient confidentiality? Hell, they don't even care about patients. Security second to the pentagon? Perhaps taking a page from their book and setting up public and private networks initially would have solved these types of issues. If protecting patient data had been a priority from the get go, I'd expect this would already be in place. Instead, maintaining that confidentiality was an idea given lip service to while measures were put in place which were known to trade off security for expediency. As noble as your organization's intentions are, a thimble full of wine in a barrel of sewer water, still gets you a barrel of sewer water. That's why extremely restrictive regulations were enacted. On 2/26/03 7:19, Chinnery, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I take exception to your comments in your second paragraph that the reality is that companies don't really care about protecting patient data. I work in a hospital and have met many people from other hospitals through seminars, meetings, etc. To say that we don't care is patently false. Patient confidentiality is a priority, second only to patient care. Our hospital has zero tolerance for PHI disclosure. A nurse blabs to someone about a patient and boom! she's fired. I know, I've seen it happen. The trouble with HIPAA is that they seem to want hospitals and healthcare organizations to be almost as secure as the Pentagon. Our administration hired a big name outfit to give their recomendations. I had to read through 23 documents from them. And some of them, the suggestions, were insane. One suggested (although it said it was optional) searching all purses and bags that patients or visitors to the hospital. I guess they're afraid someone would sneak in a floppy to be used to copy patient data. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403 http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403 http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403 , but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html
Re: duplicate emails
Are these CRs alternate recipients for mailboxes? On 2/26/03 11:06, Michael Ahlfont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example the email that you sent to me I recieved in my mailbox and a copy is sent to my yahoo account. This copy is duplicated. If this email was internal it would not be duplicated. I didn't check message id and not sure how to. I believe I would need message tracking enabled for that. Im familiar with 5.5 but I need to read up on the exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: Michelle Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: duplicate emails I'm not sure that I understand your question. The custom recipients are people outside your organization that are represented in your GAL, correct? If so, then I'm not sure why you're concerned about mail that people outside your company are getting from other people outside your company. Also, have you checked to see if the duplicate messages have the same message ID? -Original Message- From: Michael Ahlfont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: duplicate emails Hello all We have recently upgraded from exchange 5.5 to 2000. Friday we placed the OWA server is outside the firewall and switched it to do the routing of smtp email. Since we made the switch Friday night, the custom recipients receive duplicate emails only from emails generated outside the company. Emails generated from within the company are not duplicated. Any ideas on what is happening? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
On 2/26/03 11:30, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just my opinion on why it happened. From what I understand a few bad apples had some mishaps with patient information, the media gets a hold of this, blows it out of proportion, Blows what out of proportion? Insufficient safeguards on patient data? What would be a significant reaction to the unauthorized sharing of thousands of medical records? Is oops, we're terribly sorry a sufficient level of accountability for such actions? Shouldn't others in the medical industry have risen up saying, we've spent millions of dollars putting safeguards in place to protect patient privacy and this rogue entity needs to be punished severely? But they didn't.. I wonder why. Perhaps because none of them were really doing anything to protect this data. a few rep and senators decided to do something about this, because now it's been blown into this massive problem that threatens to destroy our society as we know it. It's this level of sarcasm and complete lack of understanding of why the public is concerned about their information being shared inappropriately which lead to regulations being put in place. Thus HIPPA was born. It's HIPAA. The safeguards were already in place, the industry was doing a good job creating solutions to protect patient data, but a few people screwed it up. Really? If the safeguards were in place then why are there companies making tons of cash off of implementing solutions to ensure HIPAA compliance? HIPAA compliance is one of the largest sources of IT spending anywhere at the moment. I fail to see how that can be if the safeguards are already in place. Even with HIPPA in place those same people will be out there to screw things up, they'll find one way or another, and thus something like HIPPA v2 will happen, with the cycle continuing on and on. And this is a bad thing why? With the insurance side of this, protection of patient information is extremely important. Since if you screw up once and someone out there finds out about, there are a ton of other agents out there that will be more then happy to take that account away from you. Well, first of all.. There's the all important if someone finds out. It's certainly possible that there are hundreds (nay thousands, nay tens of thousands) of incidents which have occurred which the public will never find out about. The reality is that disclosure of patient data among the largest insurers is unlikely to result in to large of a change in the status quo. Look at all the bad press Ford took for the Pinto in the 70's, yet they are still going strong. Why should we expect that a large insurer would suffer a dissimilar fate? Besides technology the bigger problem is the social side of patient data protection. Look at Kevin Metnick(spelling?), he used peoples trust in other people, against them to get the information that he wanted. What's going to stop someone from doing this? That's the biggest problem that being faced today. Social engineering is a problem. That it is the biggest problem is a debatable point. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: public folders
Given the restraints imposed... Write a server side script to send a
notification including the details deemed relevant.
On 2/25/03 3:09, Green, Jacky {PGI~Welwyn} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have set up several moderated calendars that are accessible via the Public
Folders (running Exchange 5.5). The idea being that anyone of a group of
people could make a booking, and if approved it would be entered into the
calendar. There are several calendars (e.g. Meeting Room 1, Meeting Room 2,
etc). This side of things works fine.
The problem is that when a calendar entry arrives in the inbox of the
moderator, there seems to be no way of knowing which calendar the booking is
for. You can see who made the booking, but it cannot be easily approved and
moved to the appropriate calendar, as the email makes no mention of the
moderated folder it is coming from.
I don't want Users to have to type in manually which Meeting Room they are
booking, and I don't want to use Mailboxes instead of Public Folders for the
Meeting rooms.
Does anyone know how I can include more details so the moderator is aware of
the calendar the message relates to?
many thanks
Jay Green
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Decoding /Encoding of incomming attachment in E55
Friggin Lyris Remove the sendmail server from the mix and have mail delivered directly to the Exchange server... Does the problem persist? On 2/25/03 9:15, Insite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, there is only one way in, the incoming mail bounce at a Sendmail server that just passes the mail to my Inbound IMS that takes care of the decoding. and sorry, no it´s randomly, happens to different senders in different domains and as I mentioned, it doesn´t happen all the time for one perticular sender, sometimes the same attachment is readable sometimes not, that´s why I suspect my Exchange IMS. I have actually had the same sender send the same mail to 2 different Exchange system, ie two different reciviers in the same mail, not 2 different mail, both recievers on Exchange sp4 systems. The attachment that arrives in my customers system is then sometimes, not always messed up, the same mail with the attachment to the other Exchange system never gets messed up, always readable! In the IMS there´s nothing to configure for incoming mail, Exchange 5.5 is MIME 1.0 aware and should not have any problem with decoding incoming mail that is true to MIME 1.0 information in the header, or?? Outgoing configuration is the usal stuff, ISO-8859-1, MIME, plain text Regards, Björn -- From: Ryan, Ben[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: den 25 februari 2003 15:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Decoding /Encoding of incomming attachment in E55 Do you have two possible routes into your mail system? This would explain the inconstancy and would point to one of these routes being incorrectly configured. Does this happen for all users sending to you or for just one domain? Ben -Original Message- From: Insite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 February 2003 12:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Decoding /Encoding of incomming attachment in E55 Hi, I wonder if anyone has seen this problem before and could point me in the right direction for a solution. Hasn´t found anything on TechNet or the Archives that explains this, or even better comes up with a solution. When my users recieves external mail with attachment the attachment randomly gets messed up. It´s most .doc and .pdf attachments, but also .xls and .ppt files that experince this problem. The strange thing is, if you ask the sender to do another try a little later the attachment looks ok, ie you can open and read it. The problem seems to occur while the incoming file gets decoded by the IMS. Whe have for a long time suspected the antivirus software to interfer, but the problem remains after stopping that software. This is how a Word file can look when its currupt ///spcEAOSAdBAAA8BK/EAAABAAA ZCkAAA4AYmpiav3P/c8dBBYALjYAAJ+lAACf pQAAZCUAAAD//w8A AAD//w8AAAD//w8AAGwAAOQA 5OQA5ADkAOQA5BQA APgAggQAAACCBIIEggQA We have found out that if you takes such a file into for instance WinZip, you can save it to disk in UUENCODE format, rename the file to .doc and then open it with Word. Guess I dont have to tell you what my users tells me if I suggest that! :) The thing is, why isn´t this a consistent problem, the same sender can resend the attachment and everything goes fine! Any hints would be very welcome, because I am struggeling with this one! Exchange 5.5 sp4 Regards, Björn Nilsson, EDS _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll drag in Hybrids ... It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. While I agree hydrogen engines maybe more friendly...they do produce pollution AND the infrastructure you correctly point out which is not there really WILL in fact produce pollution to make the pieces/stuff required for the cleaner part. Let me ask this..IF say you put a refrigerator in a sealed room...plug it in...leave the Fridge door openwhat happens in the room? there no free lunch...just more healthy... ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Except that none of our clients have heard about PGP. That's one of the problems with HIPPA, the solutions they want don't exist for a device that was developed back in the 60's (I think I got the time right, I'm not going to check though). It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. Same thing with e-mail and encryption. That's one of the reasons HIPPA deadlines keeps getting pushed back. Then with a solution like PGP you have to teach the users how to use it. That's a nightmare that I don't ever want to repeat again. Hell half of the users I taught have a hard time figuring out what the start button is, and it's right there in front of their face. The big problem with HIPPA was that it was designed by bureaucrats (who BTW were probably the same users that have a hard time with the start button thing) that wanted to do something to protect the people that vote for them. Except there wasn't a major problem to begin with. Sure there were a few slight mishaps here and there, but the industry was doing a fine job of learning from those mistakes and creating new solutions to prevent those from happening again. In addition to the design problems with HIPPA, you have the fact that it's become so bloated that no one knows exactly what it is or what you need to do. While you run into some so called HIPPA expert that says you need to do one thing, you can always find another that says you don't need to do that. Flat out HIPPA needs to go, and be replaced by something that's a little more well thought out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Yup. But PGP is one of the most widely deployed encryption packages and has software for various client and server packages. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson
Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
What if the shipping company uses hydrogen fuel cells? On 2/25/03 18:39, Patrick R. Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HIPAA does provide detail for securing non-electronic transmission of Personal information. Basically -- it has to be sealed and trackable (Rewgistered mail, UPS, FedEx, etc.) There is information and instruction available at http://www.hipaa.org and http://www.ahima.org. AHIMA also provides a series of online classes for $1100 which provide a form of individual IT HIPAA accreditation. -Patrick R. Sweeney http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:09 PM Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT Not an expert on the science behind this essay http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224=easterbrook022403 http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403 , but the idea of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only byproduct argument a bit disingenuous. Course as I said, I'm not an expert on the subject so I'm certainly open to knowing where the levels of hydrogen needed for such a thing would come from. Perhaps instead of replacing HIPPA, those companies subject to its regulations need to rethink how and why patient data would need to leave their environment and design secure systems (which e-mail aint) to facilitate that transmittal. Course the reality is companies aren't really interested in protecting patient data, just in being compliant with the various regulatory agencies which govern them. So, following the cheapest route to compliance they encounter the reality that cheap aint easy. On 2/25/03 16:06, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I knew I shouldn't have used that example, cause I knew somewhere we were going to get into a debate about it. In addition I should have said Hydrogen Fuel Cells which is what I was thinking of when I made the statement. As far as the pollution: Fuel cells efficiently convert hydrogen fuel and oxygen from the air into electricity. Hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (HFCEVs) emit only water vapor from their exhaust pipes. Demonstrations of HFCEVs have been successful and this technology is expected to displace internal combustion engines in the 21st Century. Which I got from pretty much the first thing I could google up here: http://www.hydrogencomponents.com/altfuel.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption-OT Chris Im curious how do you figure this statement? Next thing you'll drag in Hybrids ... It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. While I agree hydrogen engines maybe more friendly...they do produce pollution AND the infrastructure you correctly point out which is not there really WILL in fact produce pollution to make the pieces/stuff required for the cleaner part. Let me ask this..IF say you put a refrigerator in a sealed room...plug it in...leave the Fridge door openwhat happens in the room? there no free lunch...just more healthy... ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Except that none of our clients have heard about PGP. That's one of the problems with HIPPA, the solutions they want don't exist for a device that was developed back in the 60's (I think I got the time right, I'm not going to check though). It's the same problem you have with cars today. Gasoline engines produce pollution, so to change this we could move to hydrogen engines which are pollution free. But the infrastructure isn't there. Same thing with e-mail and encryption. That's one of the reasons HIPPA deadlines keeps getting pushed back. Then with a solution like PGP you have to teach the users how to use it. That's a nightmare that I don't ever want to repeat again. Hell half of the users I taught have a hard time figuring out what the start button is, and it's right there in front of their face. The big problem with HIPPA was that it was designed by bureaucrats (who BTW were probably the same users that have a hard time with the start button thing) that wanted to do something to protect the people that vote for them. Except there wasn't a major problem to begin with. Sure there were a few slight mishaps here
Re: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
Like the usernames and passwords wouldn't still be sent in plain text. lol On 2/24/03 1:05, Keith Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One option regardless of port mapping is to hide the exchange access deep down in some cryptic folder structure, to access you then have a url like http://ipaddress/xkjJ4w9lqj4xp/j295hF6KJpwqz/lo5Jd9balvq3X/exchange, and turn OFF directory listing... I think the exchange OWA scripts need changing but it should work and this is one method I've thought of for 'hiding' an OWA instance. Of course it's almost useless if you don't have the URL to click on in the first place, which probably 99% of the time people will use OWA from a public machine! You could use an easier folder path to remember, but is less secure... YMMV Rgds, Keith. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 February 2003 00:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 The PIX will do what you want, but what's the use... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
Microsoft's Certificate server is free, assuming one already owns the OS, which you do if you are running Exchange. Looking back through his original post he was discussing mapping port 80 to port 8080 because he thought (correctly) that port 80 is a pretty insecure way to do OWA. On 2/24/03 9:52, Keith Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: er. yes, but you can use https for that (anyone know of a free cert provider?). The point was that it sounded like the guy wanted to 'hide' his OWA implementation, and this is one way of doing so. Keith. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 February 2003 15:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Like the usernames and passwords wouldn't still be sent in plain text. lol On 2/24/03 1:05, Keith Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One option regardless of port mapping is to hide the exchange access deep down in some cryptic folder structure, to access you then have a url like http://ipaddress/xkjJ4w9lqj4xp/j295hF6KJpwqz/lo5Jd9balvq3X/exc hange, and turn OFF directory listing... I think the exchange OWA scripts need changing but it should work and this is one method I've thought of for 'hiding' an OWA instance. Of course it's almost useless if you don't have the URL to click on in the first place, which probably 99% of the time people will use OWA from a public machine! You could use an easier folder path to remember, but is less secure... YMMV Rgds, Keith. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 February 2003 00:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 The PIX will do what you want, but what's the use... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! Raj _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of user who have access to Calendar
What's the underlying objective? On 2/24/03 10:38, Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am wondering if anyone can help me with this request... I am trying to find out if there's a way to retrieve calendar permission list from a mailbox. I have several thousands mailboxes and I need get this information quick. Does anyone know if there's a util or program to do this??? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2002 Thank you!!! Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: List of user who have access to Calendar
Not sure if script director from MicroEye has reporting capabilities or not, but it's the only app I know that deals with folder permissions in bulk. Note to self: Grant permissions to self on CEO's calendar using multiple nested DLs. On 2/24/03 13:32, Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My mgmt wants to know how many people's calendar this user has access to for some reason, but I can't tell you for what... Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: List of user who have access to Calendar What's the underlying objective? On 2/24/03 10:38, Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I am wondering if anyone can help me with this request... I am trying to find out if there's a way to retrieve calendar permission list from a mailbox. I have several thousands mailboxes and I need get this information quick. Does anyone know if there's a util or program to do this??? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2002 Thank you!!! Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA not working
Perhaps if you had mentioned the troubleshooting steps you'd taken so far, poor Jacob would not have wasted his valuable time telling you to do something you had already done. On 2/24/03 15:16, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could not find any error in the event logs and I have re-start the services many time. After the user enter the username and password. It like the browser is trying to open the inbox. Have any seem this before? Thank You -Original Message- From: Jacob Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA not working Take a look at your event logs and re-start the services. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA not working NT4 Exchange5.5 I just found out that my OWA was not working. I was only able to get to the logon screen. I enter my password and username and then that was it the browser just stay on the logon screen. It was working about two day ago. I have not done anything new to this box. Where should I start with this problem? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) System Administrator/DBA Senior Aerospace Jet Products (858) 278-8400 EXT. 250 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515
That would be a better solution, best is subject to some debate. Simply using SSL for all of the protocols in question would likely be better as well. On 2/22/03 10:52, Ryan Finnesey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would the best solution be to use a ISA Box and also a PIX? Ryan, -Original Message- From: Patrick R. Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 It will take the hacker five, maybe six seconds longer to run a port scan. -Patrick R. Sweeney http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:35 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 The PIX will do what you want, but what's the use... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 OWA Cisco PIX 515 Hello Everyone, Here is a scenario: Exchange 2000 FE and BE configuration behind a PIX 515 firewall. FE Server is just for OWA, so that External users can access their email offsite. It works perfectly with the necessary ports enabled( 80,443,143,993).However, it is not desirable to leave 80 accessible due to potential security risk. My long-term solution is an ISA Server in the DMZ. In the interim, is there a way to configure the PIX 515 for Port address translation? I am speculating that on the PIX we can assign a different port number( e.g. port 8800..any port)and let the PIX resolve/translate/forward all requests to Port 80. My Network Administrator does not think the PIX 515 is compliant. Is there anyone in this group who has a similar environment? Thanks and happy Friday! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files zipped when sent out
I've used it for my own messages in the past and understand they have a number of very large customers who are using it and liking it. Had lunch with the owner of the company a couple of weeks ago and talked about their next version insert NDA here. On 2/21/03 8:01, Dave Vantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just took a look at this and it looks pretty good. It would seem like it could save considerable space in the message store and create a very good way to organize attachments via is search capabilities. Anyone using it and have any pro's/con's Thanks -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out ZipOut http://www.microeye.com On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files zipped when sent out
There are apparently some server based compression tools, but I've never used them, so can't comment on them. On 2/20/03 23:38, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Chris... those are for outlook 2000 and 2002.. How about outlook 97? We have quite a number of outlook 97. Thank you Cheers! Carine -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out ZipOut http://www.microeye.com On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files zipped when sent out
We had the same thing as you silly. On 2/21/03 9:04, Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could at least tell us what you had for lunch. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:01 AM Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out I've used it for my own messages in the past and understand they have a number of very large customers who are using it and liking it. Had lunch with the owner of the company a couple of weeks ago and talked about their next version insert NDA here. On 2/21/03 8:01, Dave Vantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just took a look at this and it looks pretty good. It would seem like it could save considerable space in the message store and create a very good way to organize attachments via is search capabilities. Anyone using it and have any pro's/con's Thanks -Dave Vantine -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out ZipOut http://www.microeye.com On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PST over 2Gig repair notes...
IIRC there is a solution for Ol2K as well... Included in an SR or on the officeupdate site? www.slipstick.com probably has a link. One would think that a combination of the last good backup of the PST file + Deleted Items Retention would have made the tale of woe unnecessary. Not that $500 is expensive, but the money would clearly be better served adding hard disk to the IT MP3 server. On 2/20/03 8:53, Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We had a user try to clean up his server mailbox by dragging everything into his PST. He is using Outlook 2000, which was quite happy to stuff messages into the PST until it was destroyed. tale of woe Is there any way to prevent Outlook 2000 from overstuffing a PST?? I am pretty sure that Outlook 2002 pops up a warning or something when you are about to get into trouble. It seems like this huge flaw in outlook should have been addressed by a service pack. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recovery Server NT Backup.
Assuming you have an NT4 domain infrastructure yes. On 2/20/03 10:23, Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 5.5 SP4 We have a backup recover system we built to recover mailboxes. It's running 2000 and we have been able to restore to it, but we have had two occurrences when we told NT backup to restore to the our backup system, but the back started shutting down services on the originating system and trying to restore the Dir.EDB to the originating system. I know I didn't tell it to restore the Dir but only the info store, so I'm at a loss as to why it tried to restore back to the originating. This happened one other time as well. So what I would like to do to insure this does not happen again, is to restore to the local box without it being on the wire and insure it's not going back to the originating. My problem is that even though the tape drive is on the box it will not restore if I unplug it from the wire. Do I need to get a BDC and that box on a hub and then disconnect the hub from the wire for it to restore? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files zipped when sent out
ZipOut http://www.microeye.com On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Server and Firewalls
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Well, that and that I wouldn't be using a site connector over the Internet. On 2/18/03 8:04, Tristan Gayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use a VPN for this scenario every time. - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 09:29 To: Exchange Discussions Hello I have a Windows NT 4 domain with two Exchange Servers 5.5. The two servers are located in two different geographical sites, and connect through a Site Connector. The Exchange servers are also domain controllers. I am configuring the firewall between the two sites (they connect through the internet). I came across a lot of articles in MS Knowledge Base. In one article (154596 - Configure RPC Dynamic Port Allocation to Work with Firewall), it states that I can set a range of TCP ports over 1024 (preferably over 5000) for dynamic ports needed for RPC communication (in addition to port 135). In other articles related to Exchange server (notably the following: 176466 - TCP Ports and Microsoft Exchange: In-depth Discussion; 155831 - Setting TCP/IP ports for Exchange and Outlook Client Connections Through a Firewall; 161931 - Configuring MTA TCP/IP Port # for X.400 and RPC Listens; 148732 - Setting TCP/IP Port Numbers for Internet Firewalls), they tell you how to allocate static ports to the various Exchange services. Now the question is: If I set a range of TCP ports (say from 5000 to 5020) as stated in article 154596, and make these ports available on the firewall, will it be sufficient as all the Exchange services use RPC communication or do I still need to allocate static ports for these services? In the latter case, should these ports fall in the range that I allowed in Windows NT RPC communication or should they be outside this range? In other words, will Exchange use ports in this range or is this range restricted for Windows NT Services (DHCP, WINS, NetBIOS sessions, etc.)? Thank you for your help. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration Scenario
And PF Permissions, custom permissions on folders (similar to delegate permissions Tristan mentioned), replying to old e-mails, modifying reoccurring meeting requests, synchronization of OST files, downloading of OAB files, etc. Green Field migrations are nice when you can get them, but there's a non-trivial level of work involved if one wants to make it transparent to users. Sometimes it's worth the effort to make that happen though. On 2/18/03 8:12, Tristan Gayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You also need to think about the outlook delegates, single instance storage as well as the support calls (I don't know your IT level and numbers of users) when they can't logon. Also I think that the workload for you is probably more than the benefits (if there are any to have in reality) that a sensibly planned and executed migration. Tris - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 February 2003 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions How is this method overly burdensome for end-users. All they will have to do, if my testing has been correct, is change their Outlook profile to point at the new server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions While it is a fine tool for directory integration, I don't think LDSU is the complete answer to any migration. For example, it does not move mail. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jacob Jeong Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Scenario LDSU (from HP/Compaq and I have worked with someone who wrote that programit will do pretty much everything when it comes to import and export) might be the answer for all of your questions. It will cost you but not that much. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration Scenario I wouldn't propose that I know enough about what you're doing to make a recommendation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nuzman Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migration Scenario Ed, For Exchange I agree with you. How about a Novell 4.11 to AD migration? That one I'm doing clean. Norris - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: RE: Migration Scenario I seldom believe a fresh start is worth the extra effort required of end users to deal with it. I believe it's usually easier to delete the legacy junk you don't want to keep, something you should have been doing all along through normal maintenenace. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bennett, Joshua Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migration Scenario Hello all, Just wanted to bounce my plan for migrating from Ex 5.5 to 2000 to get some feedback. I plan to bring up AD and EX2000 totally separate of the existing production NT4/Ex5.5 multi-master domain structure (we are slimming down from 8 NT domains to 1 AD Forest w/ 1 domain). I plan so migrate the NT user accounts SID history and mail-enable all the new AD accounts. I then plan to disable the IMC in Ex5.5 and export all the users mailboxes to PST files and re-import them to their new Ex2K mailboxes. The same will be done for all PF that we will carry forward. I am thinking along these lines because I feel that an ADC will import too much old legacy junk that we don't want on the new mail system. Am I missing any gotcha's here? Does what I propose to do sound feasible? Thanks in advance for any an all advice offered. Josh Bennett Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer Cotelligent, Inc. 401 Parkway Drive Broomall, PA. 19008 610-359-5929 www.cotelligent.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Re: Exchange2000 to a new server
This has been discussed 20+ times in the last 6 months, check your archives for some excellent insight on this topic. On 2/18/03 11:14, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it operational in the new box? any other considerations? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange2000 to a new server
Other than the Q article in the URL referenced below? On 2/18/03 19:16, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Those steps seems to be ok if the servername will be different, in this case the server name must stay the same because this client routes their emails trhough another company and that *other* company uses the long email address to route the messages, and because the clients *wants* to keep it the same to avoid modifying the LMHOST files on remote dialers. Do you know of a set of instructions to do the move server to a new one and keep the same name? thanks, -ER -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2000 to a new server Always the easiest way to do this is http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm. Why do you feel you must retain the old server name? That is seldom if ever really necessary. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it operational in the new box? any other considerations? thanks, =er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Routing for one internal system
Add an entry to the list of 'hosts and clients with these IP addresses' for the IP address of the host to relay. On 2/17/03 12:18, Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having difficulty finding information on this either in MS's Knowledgebase or in the various books I have: We have routing turned on on our Exchange 5.5 box (latest SP's, etc.) but have it set so that relaying is not allowed via the recommended method (set for Hosts and clients with these IP addresses checked on, but no entries made to the list). We need to have one internal server be able to send SMTP through this box, though. We're using PHP's Sendmail module (and PERL's as well) to mail the results of form entries. However, since relaying is essentially turned off, only internal mail will work. Is there a way to leave the relaying settings as-is but have a one-IP exception to the rule? I hate to open up the relaying at all, but we need to get this working. Can anyone shed any light on this problem? What can I do to get relaying working from one IP only? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: e3k FE - e2K BE
That sounds correct and would be consistent with past behavior. On 2/17/03 16:22, Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scenario 1: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and access mailboxes on Ex2000, you get the Ex2000 OWA interface (not the E3k rich or basic). Scenario 2: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and Titanium back-end server you get the new OWA interface. Is this right or should I be looking for new eyeballs since I see the E2K OWA scheme using E3K OWA FE server? Bry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ex 2000 Migration test -1018 after move mailbox.
-1018 error point towards hardware errors on the server. Make sure you have the latest bios, drivers and firmware for your hardware and contact the HW vendor for additional support if needed. On 2/16/03 20:34, Phil Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, We're currently testing our planned migration from Ex 5.5 SP4 to EX 2000 SP3 in our test lab. After moving mailboxes from EX5.5 to Ex2000 we get -1018 errors with On-line defrags etc, tried eseutil to repair but this made things worst and we couldn't mount the store. Did the test migration again and still have -1018 error on the EX2000 server so we move the mailboxes back to Ex 5.5 server and all On-line defrag test pass on the Ex 5.5 server. I'm thinking disk errors on the EX2000 server but all test have passed here apparently. Has anyone experienced this issue with the Private information store becoming corrupt with mailbox move to Ex2000? Cheers, Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange 550 error
Real domain names would be the only way we could possibly provide more info now. On 2/12/03 13:39, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI - If you check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a Generic protocol error (SMTP error). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Swing / Swing back Upgrade question....
I'd swing to 5.5 and then swing back to an upgraded E2K server. No hard reason why, just feels better all other things being equal. On 2/13/03 13:17, Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At the very beginning of the year I finally managed to install Win2k and AD into our environment (more management concerns than technical stopped me in the past)... Everything with that upgrade went pretty smoothly... Now it's time to upgrade our Exch 5.5 SP4 server to Exchange 2K... When all is said and done, we want to have Exch 2K running on the same hardware that our present Exch 5.5 install. Instead of doing a direct upgrade, I'm under the impression that doing a swing / swing back style upgrade would be better as I need to upgrade HD space on the server in the process... I have a temporary machine that should be able to handle the load as the swing server for a week or two while I rebuild the present Exch box... Since the temporary machine is really only a workstation with 1Gb RAM and an IDE RAID, and is normally only part of my test environment, I don't want to leave Exch on it permanently Unless someone can tell me why this approach is a bad idea the question I have is this: Should I make the temporary swing server an Exch 5.5 server or go ahead and make the move to Exchange 2000 on the swing machine? I'm looking for pro's and cons of either method. Thanks in advance for any advice! Joe Pochedley If you have time to do it twice, you had time to do it right in the first place. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: insufficient space to store all of your rules
Archives. On 2/11/03 20:28, Anthony Roark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange, I have many rules set in outlook. After activating all of them I get the following message: there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. Once I re-open the Rules Wizard I notice some rules have been deactivated. Has anyone seen this before? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange 550 error
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook2000
Outlook? www.slipstick.com On 2/12/03 9:27, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been installing Outlook 97 with the extension and then do the upgrade to 2000. How can I install outlook 2000 without doing the upgrade? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recall: IIScan / exmerge
I should hope so. On 2/12/03 10:35, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Liddil would like to recall the message, IIScan / exmerge. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Offline backup of Exch2k - options
Not sure who suggested that, but I'd put them on the short list for the next layoffs. On 2/12/03 10:22, HOLLIDAY, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have a remote office connected via T1. They have their own server (Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to 10Gb. Running an online backup (nightly) over the T1 is taking waaay too long. It's been suggested that we perform an offline backup, bring the stores back online, shoot the backed up files down the T1 later. I have the procedure to this using eseutil (Q296788), but I would like to know if anyone else has any other options. TIA, Eric Holliday Exchange Administrator Corporate Information Systems Logistics Management Institute McLean, VA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Holidays gone in Outlook
Is slipstick.com down? On 2/12/03 10:40, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I found that the .txt file needs updating. How can I do this from Exchange 2000 to all clients? Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: James Liddil Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays gone in Outlook I find that holidays stop appearing in Outlook 2000 after Dec 31 , 2002. In XP things are fine. What is broken? Or what am I not doing? Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Offline Folders
NoOST=3 On 2/12/03 11:46, McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 5.5. Windows 2000, Outlook 2000. I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message.. 7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar' 7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff' 7:46:32 [80070057-501-0-322] 7:46:32 The client operation failed. 7:46:32 Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store However, Offline folders are not enabled under Tools - Services or Tools - Options. We've rebuilt her profile a couple of times, didn't help. If Offline folders aren't enabled, why would it be trying to synchronize??? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange 550 error
Microsoft's definitions are sometimes interesting. Where the Mx records point generally doesn't matter... http://mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexre q=viewarticleartid=2 might help you to troubleshoot. On 2/12/03 13:39, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris - Thanks for the info - looks like it could be an MX issue as the MX record for the customer points to oldcustomername.com not newcustomername.com (although both names are still valid). FYI - If you check out MSKB 284204, it does say that 550 maps to a Generic protocol error (SMTP error). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Strange 550 error It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic). Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the basic SMTP commands in RFC821 will allow you to confirm this for yourself if you'd like.[1] [1] Essential skills to pick up, now is as good a time as any. On 2/12/03 7:42, Jeffrey Dubyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an issue with an Exchange 2000 SP3 server where an email sent from inside the Exchange organization is not getting to some recipients in a specific domain. I have logging turned up, and found a strange message: 550+not+local+host+recipientdomain.com,+not+a+gateway The 550 error maps to a generic protocol error (SMTP error), but I can't make heads or tails out of the rest of the message. What is strange is that the domain comes up successfully in nslookup and from the Exchange server, I can connect via telnet to port 25. The users have had no trouble sending email to this recipient at this domain before or since, except for this most important email (or course). There was no NDR, no nothin' - just seems like the email went into a black hole. Thanks for any assistance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange replication as fallback server
You really need better consultants... There are a number of possible solutions in and around the question you've posed including MSCS and GeoClusters. A listing of some additional solutions in this space is available at www.mail-resources.com in the web links | server | high availability portion of the site. -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 2/11/03 6:56, Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list We have Exchange Server 2000 Enterprise SP3 on a Windows 2000 Server SP3. We have asked different consultants and searched on google and MS KB but not found out whether this can be done at all We are wondering if there is any possibility to create a secondary Exchange Server as a replicate for the purpose of having a fallback system in the event of a disaster. This fallback system should contain all address lists, private mailboxes and public folders so that if the main server falls out, we could in a relatively short time switch to the fallback server. Can this be accomplished from Exchange Server or with a third party software or not at all ? Thanks for any comments Freddie -- Freddie Soerensen Conares Metal Supply Limited Tel : +423 235 5040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.conares.com E-mail returned to sender -- insufficient voltage. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: servername limited same as in 55?
Why would anyone want to do this exactly? On 2/7/03 16:10, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+sp3 1 Org Hi All We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems folders, dls) once rehomed can we just rename the servername fom B to A and expect exchange2000 to work? we remember that In 5.5 the servername should not be rename it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pfbackup utility
What the is a pfbackup utility? Is it some 3rd party product? If so, what does the vendor say? On 2/10/03 2:12, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The pfbackup is installed but not showing up in the outlook file menu Does any one know how to manually remove the pfbackup utility from outlook OR Does any one know how to show up the pf backup utility in file menu of outlook. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stripping MIME Header
Roflmao somewhere a firewall admin needs a beatin. On 2/10/03 8:24, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If a firewall smtp filter (say, WatchGuard) was stripping the MIME Headers off of all outgoing emails, would this effectively strip off the attachments? Ever since our partner company installed this firewall we can get no attachments from them. The logs show: [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header Received 837348 02/07/03 16:42:53 smtp-proxy[12849] [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header X-MS-TNEF-Correlator 837358 02/07/03 16:42:53 smtp-proxy[12849] [10.54.200.13:1508 216.141.241.27:25] removing unknown or denied header X-Mailer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Veritas BLB
SIS support is nice, but still not necessary for my needs. On 2/10/03 12:51, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Internet.com said this got rejected. So I'll try again. I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 = hours on the phone with veritas fixing everything. They are so backed up that = any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper level tech = support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned that it can do BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any input on this? I already have read the BLBs are bad stuff. But I'm interested to see = what people have say. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reference for providing access to custom db from Exchange
www.slipstick.com www.slovaktech.com writes solutions like this for customers all the time. Mention my name and get my standard 0% discount. On 2/10/03 18:19, Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to create a public contacts folder that contains the contacts from a custom internal CRM database. I know I can export the contacts to Exchange, but I prefer a linking solution, where changes to the CRM app are reflected in Exchange, and records in Exchange are either locked or reflected in the custom database. I don't know if this is possible, or even where to start looking. Can anyone give me any pointers? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange replication as fallback server
Yes, that's one of the products listed at the URL I mentioned. On 2/11/03 10:22, TWU-Durham, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: www.doubletake.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange replication as fallback server You really need better consultants... There are a number of possible solutions in and around the question you've posed including MSCS and GeoClusters. A listing of some additional solutions in this space is available at www.mail-resources.com in the web links | server | high availability portion of the site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange replication as fallback server
Can do what? Deploy DoubleTake?[1] [1] Unable to parse horribly designed flash interface to figure out what else it might be.[2] [2] A web designer somewhere needs a beatin. On 2/11/03 10:21, Drew Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: warning -- small-self-promotion alert/ Rapidapp can do this as well. www.rapidapp.com /warning Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange replication as fallback server www.doubletake.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange replication as fallback server You really need better consultants... There are a number of possible solutions in and around the question you've posed including MSCS and GeoClusters. A listing of some additional solutions in this space is available at www.mail-resources.com in the web links | server | high availability portion of the site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pfbackup utility
A personal folders tool? Bah Who would need one of those? On 2/11/03 11:19, Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's from MS http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/pfbackup.aspx What the is a pfbackup utility? Is it some 3rd party product? If so, what does the vendor say? On 2/10/03 2:12, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The pfbackup is installed but not showing up in the outlook file menu Does any one know how to manually remove the pfbackup utility from outlook OR Does any one know how to show up the pf backup utility in file menu of outlook. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange
I use domain\username for my authentication and it works just fine. Haven't tried it with the SMTP address (can't at the moment either unfortunately). On 2/11/03 15:22, Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I have Exchange 2000 SP3. One of the customers has Macs and they are using the mail applet that comes with Mac OS X (POP3/SMTP) They are reporting that often they can't send mail using our Exchange 2000 front-end servers. They get a pop-up error: the SMTP server exchange.hosting.innerhost.com rejected the password for user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please re-enter your password or cancel. (I have changed the username for the purpose of this post) We require SMTP Authentication on our servers. Is there something special about the Macs? (like the format of the username, or maybe it does not like the @ sign) Or is Mac mail just not compatible with Exchange? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WARNING! OWA 5.5 E2K
It's not the MS Exchange legacy DN? Call PSS back and tell them to find the attribute(s) in question, they can and if they won't ask them who they'd like to escalate the call to. You'll likely be able to set those attributes programmatically. On 2/11/03 16:02, Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A word of warning! If you plan on using Exchange 5.5 OWA to access E2K mailboxes, DO NOT GO NATIVE E2K! Any new users created after going native will not be able to access their mailbox via OWA 5.5. We opened a PSS call on this and Microsoft confirmed that this will not work because legacy attributes are not created after switching to native mode. They could not tell us what these legacy attributes are (a quick perusal with LDP seems to indicate there is no obvious differences in AD attributes). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange
Well, currently entourage can using LDAP... But that's another kettle of fish. On 2/11/03 16:46, Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Last time someone tried to connect to our Exchange servers with a MAPI-configured Outlook for Macintosh it did not work - that dumb application only understands the Default Global Address List. I hope they will teach Entourage how to see other global address lists. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange While this doesn't answer your main question, you might find this article interesting in relation to your last question: http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984074.html?part=dht=nhl http://news.com.com/2100-1040-984074.html?part=dhttag=nhl -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mac OS X and SMTP Auth on Exchange Hi all. I have Exchange 2000 SP3. One of the customers has Macs and they are using the mail applet that comes with Mac OS X (POP3/SMTP) They are reporting that often they can't send mail using our Exchange 2000 front-end servers. They get a pop-up error: the SMTP server exchange.hosting.innerhost.com rejected the password for user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please re-enter your password or cancel. (I have changed the username for the purpose of this post) We require SMTP Authentication on our servers. Is there something special about the Macs? (like the format of the username, or maybe it does not like the @ sign) Or is Mac mail just not compatible with Exchange? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SRS
Yes? On 2/11/03 17:23, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Domain Admins and Account Operators Security permission?
Go to where it was explicitly granted and uncheck it. The information store object perhaps? On 2/5/03 23:16, Jojo Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one of those group has inherited permission. how can i remove that? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Domain Admins and Account Operators Security permission? 'Full control' does not give a user or group permission to send as any user object. 'Send as' permissions do, and those have to be explicitly granted. Undo the granting thereof and they can no longer send as another user. On 2/5/03 21:42, Jojo Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in my Exchange Server Domain Admins and Account Operators has Full Control permission by default. Meaning all members of Domain Admins and Account Operators has the priviledge to send on behalf of any Mailbox in my Organization. i think this is not the correct setup, i want to remove that priveledges from my server. please help me on how to remove that priveledges from my server. is there any security or exchange related concern if i remove that? i wonder my exchange services may not work properly if i remove that priveledges. thanks jojo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point was that this is the straw that breaks the camels back. First my application written for DOS 3.22 stops working on Windows X, then they change core OS functionality like the ability to create an Outlook:// shortcut on the desktop. I say it's time to switch to Linux and Samsung Contact. Screw Microsoft and their poor, very poor backwards compatibility. On 2/6/03 7:00, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What exactly is your point in all of this? To be honest, I can't follow any line of reasoning or an actual point to this post. You seem to be complaining a lot about something, but I am not sure exactly what it is. There's lots of sarcasm in the post, which seems to be a substitute for actual substance. My DOS application worked under Windows 2000 server, but now doesn't under XP. How is that any different than something working under Outlook 97 and not under Outlook 2002[1]? Hell, there's functionality that worked in Outlook 2000 that was stripped out in Outlook 2000 SR1. Damn that Microsoft! Bastards the whole lot of 'em. Stripping out core OS functionality like Outlook object hyperlinks. Ye gods, that's more critical than preemptive multi-tasking! Next thing you know they'll want us all to upgrade to Exchange 2000 and use these uniquely addressable hyperlink thingies and webdav. When will they learn that 640k is enough RAM for anyone? I have no idea what if any syntax will work for your Outlook:// hyperlinks Greg, but thanks for the entertainment. I'd test, but I don't exactly use Outlook 2002 any longer. [1] Counts on fingers.. Outlook 97, Outlook 98, Outlook 98, Outlook 2000, Outlook 2001, Outlook 2002... Six. Yep, only six versions. What were they thinking?[2] [2] There wasn't a similar hyperlink syntax for the Exchange client was there? Cause then I'd really be mad at them for changing things TWICE!!! On 2/5/03 18:42, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, I've already seen that Q-article. Still cannot get it to link correctly to an Excel file in Public Folder Favorites. I guess I'll just have to keep trying different combinations until I hit the magic syntax that makes it work, if it is even possible. Second, it is completely different. Last time I checked, I could still pop out to a command prompt and enter \temp\picture.gif or notepad c:\temp\file.txt and I can look at a file. This is equivalent. Backwards compatibility between an OS that has seen 6 or 7 version changes and an OS that has seen 1 version change are completely different things. In addition, one is a matter of supporting third-party applications and this is a matter of supporting core OS functionality. You cannot blame them for not providing backwards compatibility for applications written to an OS eons ago but to not provide compatibility for a core OS function of only a year or two ago is sad. KB 296071 and no it's not that different. On 2/5/03 16:36, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is a far cry from something that worked in Windows 2000 and Outlook 2000 to Windows XP and Outlook 2002. We're talking basic URL functionality here. Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2 applications don't run on Windows XP. Bastards! On 2/5/03 15:57, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, if you put in the , XP wants to add an http://; in front of it. If you do not put that in, it just creates the shortcut, but then it throws up an error message saying that Outlook cannot open the folder or file. I even tried to ~ as suggested by Slipstick. No luck. Stupid. I hate it when Microsoft puts things into their product and then strips out functionality or significantly changes things to the point that stuff does not work. Poor, very poor, backwards compatibility. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! My point is that Microsoft is an evil company which makes crap software and if it wasn't for them I'd be happily flipping burgers at Burger King or hosting my own 'news show' on Fox. On 2/6/03 9:48, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I get his point, and you don't, so I'll explain it to you. It's that every time you perceive that something doesn't work, Greg, you paint it as a giant Microsoft crusade to ruin your life. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help FREE linksys wireless router
Keep your router and reinstall the TCP/IP stack. Then if it still doesn't work, use RPCPing to test. On 2/6/03 10:16, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The workstation has internet can log into OWA no problem. Used Ip address resolves to Exchange server name not to mail box name. I can ping to the world. Lets up the anty..I got a (if you need) new in box never opened linksys cable DSL wireless router with 4 ports built in FREE to the Guru who can lead my confused mind down the right path. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help try the ip #. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help OK here goes. I am emailing this help request from my laptop using outlook 2002. Server is an exchange 2k sp3 enterprise and 2k advance server sp3 both items. My laptop is on my desk next to my workstation. It is logged into exchange and using this mail box no problems. Both laptop and Workstation are running XP pro SP1 and outlook 2002. My workstation cannot connect to the exchange Server. I keep getting name cannot be resolved. I have removed office and reinstalled no help. Does anyone have any idea's?? Help if you can I'm out of Idea's!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help FREE linksys wireless router
Sure that the user logged in has appropriate permissions to see the address list which contains the mailbox in question? Can you resolve using the DN of the mailbox in question (cn=user,cn=recipeints,dn=yadda)? If you log in as another user onto the system can you resolve this mailbox (and if you set the permissions on the Exchange Advanced tab to 'none' can you present a set of permissions which will resolve the mailbox)? On 2/6/03 10:32, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The workstation will let me resolve to another mailbox on system. The exsvr is a hosted box. My work station can see one global address list only. The default address list has been deleted. (not needed)Something is hosed in this workstations XP pro install I just do not know where. My laptop running xp pro has no problems as does my home office! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help FREE linksys wireless router Keep your router and reinstall the TCP/IP stack. Then if it still doesn't work, use RPCPing to test. On 2/6/03 10:16, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The workstation has internet can log into OWA no problem. Used Ip address resolves to Exchange server name not to mail box name. I can ping to the world. Lets up the anty..I got a (if you need) new in box never opened linksys cable DSL wireless router with 4 ports built in FREE to the Guru who can lead my confused mind down the right path. -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help try the ip #. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help OK here goes. I am emailing this help request from my laptop using outlook 2002. Server is an exchange 2k sp3 enterprise and 2k advance server sp3 both items. My laptop is on my desk next to my workstation. It is logged into exchange and using this mail box no problems. Both laptop and Workstation are running XP pro SP1 and outlook 2002. My workstation cannot connect to the exchange Server. I keep getting name cannot be resolved. I have removed office and reinstalled no help. Does anyone have any idea's?? Help if you can I'm out of Idea's!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIScan / exmerge
Tools | Recover Deleted Items? On 2/6/03 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will either of these utilities work against a public store for a contact-type folder? I have a 5.5 pub.edb but wondering whether there's any other way to recover a shared contacts folder from it except to build a 5.5 recovery server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIScan / exmerge
Neither of those tools works against an unmounted store of any kind, so a recovery server would be required. Ontrack's tool might work, btu for this particular scenario a recovery server is less expensive. On 2/6/03 17:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do, but in E2K. This is an outside client with only one (SBS) server which is also now E2K. I'll help him do it if that's the only way it can be done, just wondered. (Yep, somebody forgot to copy out a shared contact file before wiping the old server...) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIScan / exmerge Build a recovery server. You should have one anyway. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIScan / exmerge Will either of these utilities work against a public store for a contact-type folder? I have a 5.5 pub.edb but wondering whether there's any other way to recover a shared contacts folder from it except to build a 5.5 recovery server. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to prevent logon during move mailbox
Move them at 3 AM. On 2/6/03 17:48, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+SP3 1 forest Do we have any Qarticle explaining how to prevent logon during an exchage 2000 move mailbox process? I have tried the article below it does work for msx2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;218920 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird event error
PF's don't accept NDRs. A message being sent somewhere within the system is being sent to an address which is ambiguous. In the scripts section of www.swinc.com can help locate whatever object has suplicate SMTP addresses. On 2/6/03 19:02, Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone seen this before? I can't find it on the web or on the support site. I am getting a ton of NDR's because of this. Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Transport Delivering Event ID: 2091 Date: 2/6/2003 Time: 4:37:29 PM User: N/A Computer: Servername Description: A message deliver to public folder store First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (Servername) with message class REPORT.IPM.NOTE.NDR is being dropped. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. The NDRs are showing this: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Sent: 2/4/2003 4:44 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Public Folder Store (Servername) on 2/6/2003 3:01 AM A configuration error in the e-mail system caused the message to bounce between two servers or to be forwarded between two recipients. Contact your administrator. server.domain.com #4.4.6 If someone can point me in the direction to trouble shoot this, I would really appreciate it. thanks Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Impugning my personal integrity?[1][2][3] [1] Ponders recommendation to several people this week of Infonition software. [2] Wonders if his statements about the abilities of Herr Deckler to a customer they met with today should be amended. [3] Decides to cross him off Christmas card list instead.. On 2/6/03 19:03, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He's probably one of those Microsoft MVP's anyway, so he's on their payroll to be a bigot. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: double contacts in address book
Outlook has faxing ability in every mode, given the proper software. On 2/5/03 9:14, Public Folder: Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2000, Outlook XP. When I make a contact and I add a fax number in the contact (then save) I see that contact twice in my address list. When I delete the fax number the contact is only once in my address book. How can I add a fax number without seeing the contact twice in the address book. This is by design. Outlook has faxing ability in Internet Mail Only mode, so MS included the fax number in the contact list (address book) The second item listed in your address book is the fax entry. I have never seen a way to disable this, but it sure would be nice. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Mailing List Software
I have a journalism degree with an English minor actually[1]. That¹s why my usage was spot on, even if the sentence itself was a bit of a run on. http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/SubjectVerb.html#none --- Begin Quoted Text --- When words like none are the subject Other words such as none, any, all,more, most, and some may take eithersingular or plural verbs, depending on the context. Some of the dollar was spent. Some of the dollars were spent. Note: here the prepositional phrase does affect the subject. It tells you whether you are talking about a part of one thing (singular) or about a number of things (plural). --- End Quoted Text --- Them refers to 3rd party products (plural). [1] Iowa State University of Science and Technology [2] [2] Go Clones. On 2/5/03 6:03, McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tut tut, Chris! none of them ARE... (!) none ARE... (!?) wasn't you taught english proper? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January, 2003 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. On 1/17/03 8:55, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an automated mailing list on MS Exchange for nowt Nik -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software What, you wanted to give away software that was free? On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free Mailing List Software Sensitivity: Private Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help Please
Sherpa Software has such a tool among others... www.mail-resources.com lists at least one other I think. On 2/5/03 10:56, Marc Mearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: User Group Can any one please help or tell me of any packages that they know of that can search the Exchange 2000 database for certain text in email messages( quite sophisticated analysis). The program would need do lexical analysis of the users emails. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Free Mailing List Software
Journalists don't make any money unless they go on TV and pontificate about insignificant things which don't upset their corporate handlers.[1] I thankfully don't live in a country which has to submit to EU rulings on soccer for pigs or language rules based on 400 year old usage. So, my usage of none and the corresponding verb agreement conforms to every example of current proper usage I could find and I'll stick with that for the moment. :) [1] Apparently asking public officials during a press conference if they honestly expect anyone with a high school education to believe the crap they are spouting doesn't get you too far either. On 2/5/03 12:05, McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, nice degree to have (what you messing around with computers for, then? And at a time when we need good journalists more than ever!) but... None is an abbreviated form of NOT ONE. It is always singular. Well, in GB English at least. Common usage may be otherwise but is still generally considered incorrect. The products to which you are referring are Countable and thus you are saying, Not one of the products IS free. If you were referring to an uncountable, you could in modern - grammatically dubious - English say, None of the soup was eaten, where None here is an abbreviated (though dubious) form of NOT ANY. 'Properly' you would say, Not any of the soup was eaten. However, since we have the American people to thank for modern 'English', and English is a beautifully fluid and democratic language, I will not clip my children's ears for such utterances as was my fate. (I was an English teacher in another life) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February, 2003 17:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software I have a journalism degree with an English minor actually[1]. That's why my usage was spot on, even if the sentence itself was a bit of a run on. http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/SubjectVerb.html#none --- Begin Quoted Text --- When words like none are the subject Other words such as none, any, all,more, most, and some may take eithersingular or plural verbs, depending on the context. Some of the dollar was spent. Some of the dollars were spent. Note: here the prepositional phrase does affect the subject. It tells you whether you are talking about a part of one thing (singular) or about a number of things (plural). --- End Quoted Text --- Them refers to 3rd party products (plural). [1] Iowa State University of Science and Technology [2] [2] Go Clones. On 2/5/03 6:03, McCarthy, Eugene (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tut tut, Chris! none of them ARE... (!) none ARE... (!?) wasn't you taught english proper? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January, 2003 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange, none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry. On 1/17/03 8:55, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its not a commercial thing, just a group of people who have had enough of yahoogroups, and I wondered if it was possible to run an automated mailing list on MS Exchange for nowt Nik -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 14:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software What, you wanted to give away software that was free? On 1/17/03 8:26, Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Makes me wish I had time to continue developing this. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free Mailing List Software Sensitivity: Private Hello Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS Exchange Server 5.5 Thanks in advance Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Re: Global Address List problem
The e-mail address field where in the GAL? Step by step it for the guys who ride the short bus please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem When a user opens the GAL the Email address field is populated with /o=orgname/ou=sitename/cn=Recipients/cn=username. I don't have any 5.5 servers in the site but I haven't switched to Native mode until I am sure I won't need to do a restore from an 5.5 backup. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Where exactly do you mean that they are displaying users' email addresses as an x.400 address rather than the SMTP address? What does your Exchange 5.5 Site Addressing show? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem So if that is normal, how do I get the display of my GAL to show the SMTP address rather than the x.400 address? -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, that is normal for an upgraded Exchange 5.5 site and as far as I know, this policy is required while you are running in a mixed-mode site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, the detail templates are set correctly. The one thing I found is the recipient policy for my site is: ((mailNickname=*)(legacyExchangeDN=/O=MYORG/OU=MYSITE/*)) while the default policy is: (mailnickname=*) The site policy has a higher priority than the default policy. I am still playing catch-up on some of the finer points of Exchange 2000 so I don't fully understand this process. Would this effect the layout of the GAL? What are the ramifications of moving the default policy higher than the site policy? Thanks, -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Serini, Siro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R: Global Address List problem Did you check if the details templates are set correctly. I mean is the details templates control (it must be a multi value control) pointing to the proxy-addresses field? -Messaggio originale- Da: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Inviato: martedì 4 febbraio 2003 19.03 A: Exchange Discussions Oggetto: Global Address List problem I recently used the swing method to upgrade 2 Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange 2000 SP3. The Global Address List is now displaying users email addresses as an x.400 address rather than the SMTP address. Users have both a x.400 address and an SMTP address. When I go into System Manager and preview the Global Address List it displays correctly but from Outlook clients it doesn't. I haven't been able to locate a knowledge base article that covers this. Anybody have any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Browser addresses drop down arrow list
Huh? On 2/5/03 13:36, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Browser addresses drop down arrow list
Ah... There's some good kiosk software for that. On 2/5/03 15:52, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone wanted to limit the URLs to ONLY the OWA URL. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Browser addresses drop down arrow list Huh? On 2/5/03 13:36, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2 applications don't run on Windows XP. Bastards! On 2/5/03 15:57, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, if you put in the , XP wants to add an http://; in front of it. If you do not put that in, it just creates the shortcut, but then it throws up an error message saying that Outlook cannot open the folder or file. I even tried to ~ as suggested by Slipstick. No luck. Stupid. I hate it when Microsoft puts things into their product and then strips out functionality or significantly changes things to the point that stuff does not work. Poor, very poor, backwards compatibility. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Global Address List problem
I haven't touched Outlook in a few months so forgive me if I've forgotten a thing or 3, but isn't this true in all versions of Outlook against all versions of Exchange? IIRC what you are seeing is by product design. On 2/5/03 15:57, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, When I (or any other user) open the GAL from Outlook they see the following fields: Name Business Phone Office Title Alsas E-Mail Type E-Mail Address All the fields display as expected except E-Mail address. E-Mail address has the X.500 address and I would rather it display the SMTP address. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Global Address List problem The e-mail address field where in the GAL? Step by step it for the guys who ride the short bus please. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem When a user opens the GAL the Email address field is populated with /o=orgname/ou=sitename/cn=Recipients/cn=username. I don't have any 5.5 servers in the site but I haven't switched to Native mode until I am sure I won't need to do a restore from an 5.5 backup. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Where exactly do you mean that they are displaying users' email addresses as an x.400 address rather than the SMTP address? What does your Exchange 5.5 Site Addressing show? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem So if that is normal, how do I get the display of my GAL to show the SMTP address rather than the x.400 address? -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, that is normal for an upgraded Exchange 5.5 site and as far as I know, this policy is required while you are running in a mixed-mode site. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Global Address List problem Yes, the detail templates are set correctly. The one thing I found is the recipient policy for my site is: ((mailNickname=*)(legacyExchangeDN=/O=MYORG/OU=MYSITE/*)) while the default policy is: (mailnickname=*) The site policy has a higher priority than the default policy. I am still playing catch-up on some of the finer points of Exchange 2000 so I don't fully understand this process. Would this effect the layout of the GAL? What are the ramifications of moving the default policy higher than the site policy? Thanks, -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Serini, Siro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R: Global Address List problem Did you check if the details templates are set correctly. I mean is the details templates control (it must be a multi value control) pointing to the proxy-addresses field? -Messaggio originale- Da: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
KB 296071 and no it's not that different. On 2/5/03 16:36, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is a far cry from something that worked in Windows 2000 and Outlook 2000 to Windows XP and Outlook 2002. We're talking basic URL functionality here. Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2 applications don't run on Windows XP. Bastards! On 2/5/03 15:57, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, if you put in the , XP wants to add an http://; in front of it. If you do not put that in, it just creates the shortcut, but then it throws up an error message saying that Outlook cannot open the folder or file. I even tried to ~ as suggested by Slipstick. No luck. Stupid. I hate it when Microsoft puts things into their product and then strips out functionality or significantly changes things to the point that stuff does not work. Poor, very poor, backwards compatibility. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Analyze your single Instance Ratio.
There's no exact way to predict what effect SIS will have on the mailbox store is a move done using PST files. Using Tools | Move Mailbox SIS is maintained. On 2/5/03 17:18, John Strongosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In going over the 20 Tips for Exchange 2000 Migration paper from Kieran McCorry, I looked at our Single instance Ratio for our biggest Server and it has a 4.21 which is somewhat ok, I guess. What I want to know if I'm reading this correct if I do a Move Mailbox migration,to 2000 my Information store will increase in size about 4 times? Am I right and why would anybody dispute the benefit of a single instance store? ___ \\ - - // (--@-@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
