Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

Those MU-MIMO numbers look pretty weak. The only one I've seen that bad on our network turned out to be defective. What does the VC sounding look like under stats/radio? Do you have a bunch of VCs that are un-tracked? On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Joe Novak wrote: > This doesn't tell you

Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

This doesn't tell you what group the users are apart of, more about how often you are able to group users on the downlink. https://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/450m-slot-grouping-help/td-p/71749 2nd post, " What the table shows is actually like a "histogram" of how many SMs are

Re: [AFMUG] 450M - Medusa groupings?

Beyond the grouping, I would like to know the various azimuths so I know how well or poorly we've aimed the Medusa. bp On 6/8/2018 12:41 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote: On the statistics, you can see the mummy groupings, so this means my users are mostly in 2,3,4 elements of the MUMIMO

Re: [AFMUG] 450m power

we are using netonix IDC Sw to a Eltek rectifier.. Works like a charm From: Af > on behalf of Ty Inc > Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" > Date:

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

.@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Forrest Christian > (List Account) > *Sent:* Sunday, December 31, 2017 2:38 AM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) > > > > You can also power a medusa with any PacketF

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

| Skywave Wireless, Inc. Ph: 402-372-1975 | Fax: 402-372-1058 Direct: 402-372-1052 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2017 2:38 AM To: af <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

bited. > > > > > > *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of > "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com> <ch...@wbmfg.com> > *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> <af@afmug.com&g

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

t; on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> *Date: *Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) I wou

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

that still works and if it doesn�t, Chuck�s would. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Yeah but it requires over 50W

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

copying, or storage of this message or its attachments is > strictly prohibited. > > > > > > *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" < > ch...@wbmfg.com> > *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *D

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

23G.� Without running the numbers, I�m pretty sure that still works and if it doesn�t, Chuck�s would. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

On 12/30/17 7:50 AM, Rory Conaway wrote: The 450M needs 50w?  I thought only the AirFiber needed that much power. Keep in mind that this cable is 23G.  Without running the numbers, I’m pretty sure that still works and if it doesn’t, Chuck’s would. The 450m is like 7x radios in a single

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

: Friday, December 29, 2017 10:22 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Yeah but it requires over 50W iirc vs a UBNT AP 8-10w From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Rory Conaway <r...@triadwirele

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

fmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:22 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Isn’t the 450m 48v? Rory From: Af [mailt

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

at 12:05 PM To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Andreas We used these SYNCBOX JUNIOR AUX PORT VERSION Works like a charm Neil On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>&

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

9:43 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) > > > We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andreas Wiatowski, CEO > > Silo Wireless Inc. > > 1-866-727-4138

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

ehalf of "ch...@wbmfg.com" <ch...@wbmfg.com> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:47 AM To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Do you already h

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Do you already have the CMM5? If not I would use Packetflux. From: Andreas Wiatowski Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:43 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) We need power and timing, but no data… hence the CMM5. Cheers, Andreas

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

t;af@afmug.com> Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 11:06 AM To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) I would work out ohms law on it to make sure. Do you need to run data over the CAT 5? If not, you really don’t ne

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

Isn't the 450m 48v? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino A. Villarini Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 9:19 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) Power consumption from the 450M is very different form a UBNT Unifi AP

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

to:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Friday, December 29, 2017 at 12:04 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power) If you use

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

I would work out ohms law on it to make sure. Do you need to run data over the CAT 5? If not, you really don’t need the CMM5, just connect all the wires of similar polarity and connect direct to the power supply. From: Andreas Wiatowski Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:14 AM To: af@afmug.com

Re: [AFMUG] 450M maximum length of Cat5e (Just for power)

If you use 23G Cat-6, you should be fine. We just connected a Ubiquiti Unifi radio at 490’ and it’s running fine. We used Primus direct burial cable for this run. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Wiatowski Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 7:15 AM To:

Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

The SFP port is licensed. I'm not sure if this is/was an issue with the SFP port or something else. I had set it to get DHCP in the lab to make it easier to transition to the field. When I finally got back into it, it had taken the DHCP address it had gotten in the lab and disabled the DHCP

Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

you will need a license to use the sfp port. roland > What are the default pins on a 450m with POE out set on the aux port. It is set to use the SFP but I'm getting nada on that port even with a patch cable and their SFP. It links fine but is sending zero packets. Hopefully with a reset it will

Re: [AFMUG] 450M default pins

I don't think there's default plug support on the aux port. Because it's not needed. Same as the 450i. Give it a quick 1-2 second power cycle. That will make the boot loader pause for I think 30 seconds. Open your browser to 169.254.1.1 and you'll see the reboot to defaults option. You might

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

ok.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com <mailto:cpeter...@portnetworks.com>> *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

cebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------ > *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM > *Subjec

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

g Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs > > Got the

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

m Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:15:04 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs Got the SFP kit and entitlement. Created the license and applied it, but I can't find anything in the config about the SFP port or any way to tell it to use the SFP port. Am I just being stupid and missing something? On

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

>> >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> While I have your attention, I have two more 450M questions. >>>> >>>> 1) What are the supported POE pinouts? >>>> >>>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated groun

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

t; 1) What are the supported POE pinouts? >>> >>> 2) Off chance, but it it ground agnostic, i.e isolated ground? >>> >>> It is nice to see an SFP port but I really would have LOVED to see and >>> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear. >>&g

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

ED to see and >> SFP and -48VDC or +/-48VDC like most Siklu gear. >> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> >> wrote: >> >>> In this day and age… >>> >>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mik

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

ge… >> >> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mike Hammett < >> af...@ics-il.net> >> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM >> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> &g

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

> Date: Thursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM > To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs > > A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously? > > > > - > Mike Hammet

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs > > A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously? > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

hursday, August 3, 2017 at 2:34 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs A license key to use the SFP port? Seriously? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.c

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > *From: *"Matt Mangriotis" <matt.mangrio...@cambiumnetworks.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs > > Carl – > > >

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

, August 3, 2017 10:20:32 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs Carl – 1) Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one… 2) Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit. The kit consists of three parts

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

We routinely run Bidi optics in the 820c’s with no issues. Our usual vendor is FlexOptics, which can be programmed to mimic pretty much any locked optic, but we just run a generic profile on them. They work fine though Cambium doesn’t provide any SFP diagnostics (as far as I know they don’t

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

wrote: > Are we totally stuck with Cambium only optics? > > *From:* Matt Mangriotis > *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:35 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs > > > *Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA. However, if you > mean B

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Are we totally stuck with Cambium only optics? From: Matt Mangriotis Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 9:35 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA. However, if you mean BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Further to 1) … I couldn’t find any information on BIDA. However, if you mean BIDI Simplex, then we don’t currently support this, but have plans to add this support (via software) in the near future. I don’t yet have a release this support is targeted for, but it will be on the roadmap once

Re: [AFMUG] 450M SFPs

Carl – 1) Not sure on this… I have asked engineering about support for BIDA module (not BIDI?), and will post an answer when I get one… 2) Yes, there is an “extended” gland that comes with the kit. The kit consists of three parts: the SFP module itself, the extended gland, and the

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

tflux power injectors will support 2 >> amps per channel. >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >&

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

t; Yea only one. 450M spec sheet says 80 Watts!!! Hence this 100 watt POE. >> >> >> >> I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps >> per channel. >> >> >> >> Adam >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

ill Prince > *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync > > > > That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more. > > > > bp > > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > &g

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

atts!!! Hence this 100 watt POE. I need to see if any of the Packetflux power injectors will support 2 amps per channel. Adam *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:11 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: OK SyncBox Junior works for me. � Would this

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync That would certainly power ONE 450M. Probably not a lot more. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 3/23/2017 12:08 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: OK SyncBox Junior works for me. � Would this power supply be OK? � http://tyconsyste

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

OK SyncBox Junior works for me. Would this power supply be OK? http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/ac-passive-gigabit/482-tp-poe-hp-56g Adam From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 10:29 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

23, 2017 12:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't remember. That said, I know Sean has said that

Re: [AFMUG] 450M power and Sync

The 450m uses "Cambium Sync" and I still don't know what the hell that is. AFAIK, that's only the CMM5 so far. Last Mile Gear might support it, I don't remember. That said, I know Sean has said that his 450m's are powered and receiving traditional Canopy Sync from a PacketFlux

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

Interestingthe VC limit had never been a practical limit the whole time I used Canopy. I guess we're saying it could be now? -- Original Message -- From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: 3/6/2017 6:51:23 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 45

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

I can say it works fine with 130+ that's what we have on up to so far. On 3/6/2017 5:51 PM, George Skorup wrote: The VC limit is still 238 on 2.5ms framing. 5ms framing cuts that in half. The HP channel enabled on an SM also sucks up a VC, so keep that in mind. On 3/6/2017 5:35 PM, Dan

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

The VC limit is still 238 on 2.5ms framing. 5ms framing cuts that in half. The HP channel enabled on an SM also sucks up a VC, so keep that in mind. On 3/6/2017 5:35 PM, Dan Petermann wrote: Maximum amount of SMs. The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of bandwidth

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

Maximum amount of SMs. The 450s have a limit of 200 (or so). Practically, you run out of bandwidth before reaching that limit. With the 450M having a potential of 3-4 times the bandwidth capacity, the number of VCs available may become a limit. Right now we hit 60-70 customers per AP before

Re: [AFMUG] 450M

I don't think there is an answer. Or are you asking what is the maximum number of SMs it will register to? At one time, in the early days of Canopy, the answer was 200. Or are you asking about loading and performance? -Original Message- From: Dan Petermann Sent: Monday, March 06,

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

ent: Friday, February 17, 2017 12:43 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector I would suggest trying it. The 450m also has 5-6 dB better uplink sensitivity. When you add the uplink beamforming gains to this, you'll see uplink modulation improvements in nearly

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

of this, that I am confident in it. Matt (@CambiumMatt) -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:31 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector > IIRC, the 450m does not have the active fil

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

> IIRC, the 450m does not have the active filter like the 450i. They are > instead relying on the beam-steering to combat the noise. That's a bit disappointing. We have sites that have PTP450 backhauls and PMP450 AP's in 5 ghz band on same tower.

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

*Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 6:17 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector Adam, do you need more processing power or the uplink noise filter? My 450 are performing just fine. I don't see a huge reason to upgrade just to a 450i. I have a few

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

it is the adaptive filter doing its thing? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Craig Schmaderer Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 6:17 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector Adam, do you need more processing power or the uplink noise

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

oun...@afmug.com> on behalf of SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:40:10 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector :) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Thursday, February 16,

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

:) From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:36 PM To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector Welcome back comrade On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband"

Re: [AFMUG] 450M limited vs 450i integrated sector

Welcome back comrade On Feb 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "SmarterBroadband" wrote: > Has anyone done a real world comparison of the 450m limited vs 450i > integrated sector? > > > > I would like to know if the 450m in sector mode works as well or better > than the new integrated sector

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

n: fb-logo-100x100.png] <http://www.facebook.com/pages/WAV-Inc/290775077620146> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Yuchasz Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 6:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Forest, We are really excited about this product as well. I have actu

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

dwh...@converge-tech.com> dwh...@converge-tech.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:00 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Cambium would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for those meddling kids! On Tue,

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Christian (List Account) Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:22 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Very very close... I'll be taking pre-orders as soon as I have a confirmed ship date on the enclosures, and am confident that I don't have a major design issue on the latest set of circuit

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

lto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 1:36 PM To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ok, Here are some pics and yes to e

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

want now! > > > -- > *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m > > > I seem to remember there was a connection b

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Forest how close are you to having that rack module ready! I want now! From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 5:12:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m I seem

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

that if I remember correctly, his PhD was actually in Experimental Psychology, and this was evident in his dealings with coworkers. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Here

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Here is a fragment of a 10 year old note to Motorola legal about a call I had with one of their guys back when I was paying pretty large royalties to be listed on their third party website. (I held H pol for over a year at their request due to their deal with Earthlink) I told him

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

/2017 10:55 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m All Ethernet gear has to have

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

om] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m > > > > All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it will > not pass certain specs. > > > > But you n

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Ken, I have not fully reviewed the specs but from what I gather the voltage is passive and the 29v has to have 29v supply. This gives it a more segmented service that is deserved by the cambium gear connected to it. I like the idea of no moving parts. I have always been a Mil-spec kind of

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Thanks, that explains a lot. So the controller exists. And it can go side-by-side with an injector. And that’s quite a honkin’ heat sink. So it’s more than 1U high. Do you think it generates regulated 56V (or 29.5V for the other version) from 48V in? If not, why the big heat sink? To be

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built in or it will not pass certain specs. But you need replicable/expendable robust external surge suppressors as the first line of defense. If the surge suppressor is designed properly it will not degrade

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

wrote: I sent the gang out to look for any Cambium documentation on the CMM5. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:28 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m All Ethernet gear has to have some surge protection built

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Hohhof Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:05 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Looks like a stealth product. Maybe WikiLeaks can get us a spec sheet. David, can you post a photo of your setup? It looks like around $1000 street price for 4 ports, plus a separate controller, plus

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

connect to the module? As opposed to generating the appropriate voltages internally from the 48V input? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m If anyone is going 450m I would

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

If anyone is going 450m I would really suggest the CMM5 line of products to go with it. Takes all the guess work out of gps timing and surge protection at the base or control point. Also, its a long term solution for those needing high capacity within highly dense areas. Just got our

Re: [AFMUG] 450M and 5.4ghz?

As soon as the FCC grants approval. Which should be "soon". If I were a betting man I'd say 1-2 months. -Sean On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:02 PM Sam Lambie wrote: > When is it slated to operate in the 5.4 band? > > > -- > -- > *Sam Lambie* > > > Taosnet Wireless Tech. > >

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

with them. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 3:43 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland Yeah, those aren't perfect, but they work. Glad those worked for you too. Took me like 3 hours of scouring catalogs

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

Yeah, those aren't perfect, but they work. Glad those worked for you too. Took me like 3 hours of scouring catalogs to find those. I was initially searching for a plastic PG16, but you have to have the short base threads like Cambium's version or it will run into the circuit board on a 450i.

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

I bought 10 of these the other day: http://www.newark.com/lapp-kabel/52015810/cable-clamp-gland/dp/19M8609 They are shorter, and the rubber bushing inside has a bigger hole, so we'll need to work harder to seal it, but it is a heck of a lot cheaper than the official Cambium gland. From: Af

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

*Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it for long term use but just getting started is fine. Thanks, Josh *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Broadwick -

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

com> On 12/30/2016 8:52 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 450i and 450m do not. *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Joshua Heide *Sent:* Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t rec

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

450i and 450m do not. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joshua Heide Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 9:38 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it for long term use but just getting started

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Ethernet cable gland

FYI... Cable Glands are a 'standard' item, PG16 is the size. Feel free to search ebay for 'PG16 cable gland' and you can pick your choice of material and qty. :) Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Well the 450 ap’s have a built in gps that works, I don’t recommend it for long term use but just getting started is fine. Thanks, Josh From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 7:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m

Re: [AFMUG] 450m

No, like all 450 gear it requires an external source. Jeff Broadwick ConVergence Technologies, Inc. 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@converge-tech.com > On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Joshua Heide wrote: > > Does the 450m have a built in gps? If so has anyone

Re: [AFMUG] 450M resource usage?

15.0.2 adds uplink steering and some other performance fixes. We don't have any 450m's deployed, but I did update the entire 450 network to 15.0.2 last week and it seems to be pretty stable. On 12/26/2016 8:21 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: Got a 450M AP running 15.0.1, where can I see the MU_MIMO

Re: [AFMUG] 450m-epmp Frankenstein

behalf of Bill Prince < > part15...@gmail.com> > > > Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > > > Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 2:06 PM > > > > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m-epmp Fr

Re: [AFMUG] 450m-epmp Frankenstein

Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 2:06 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m-epmp Frankenstein My thought is if you need to replace either unit, you've essentially "married" them together;

Re: [AFMUG] 450m-epmp Frankenstein

com <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 12:51 PM To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Pictures Needed

Gino Villarini > *Sent:* Saturday, December 17, 2016 7:37 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450m Pictures Needed > > > > On 12/16/16, 10:52 AM, "Af on behalf of Matt Mangriotis" > <af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of matt.mangrio...@cambiumne

Re: [AFMUG] 450m Pictures Needed

Best looking mount I have ever seen. From: Gino Villarini Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 7:37 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m Pictures Needed On 12/16/16, 10:52 AM, "Af on behalf of Matt Mangriotis" <af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of matt.mangrio...@cambiu

  1   2   3   4   >