Re: rewrite CI pipeline

I would not expect to see any differences between openjdk distributions. Anthony > On Nov 21, 2022, at 4:34 PM, Sai Boorlagadda > wrote: > > !! External Email > > I was thinking it has to do with either JDK or ubuntu. I also tried > 'temurin' > and there were different sets of errors. So to

Re: [DRAFT] Geode Board Report for November 9th

Let’s put this statement in context. It’s not _that_ unusual for some projects to have no commits for a month. But is it is very indicative of the state of the Geode community given its history of being one of the more active ASF projects. As noted in the last board report, project activity

Re: [DRAFT] Geode Board Report for November 9th

Do you want to add the results of the PMC roll call? > On Nov 4, 2022, at 11:42 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > !! External Email > > In addition to the resolution to terminate the geode project, I think we > should file a board report for this quarter with some more details. Here is a > draft, let

Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

@geode.apache.org>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic ‼ External Email Hello, I vote to keep an open source version. Volunteer for PMC. Please ping me. Cheers. -Original Message- From: Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com>> Sent: 25 October 2022 18:38 To: dev@geode

Re: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic

I added the user@ list for visibility. I believe the purpose of taking a VOTE here is to look for community consensus on this idea and perhaps find new people interested in carrying the project forward. The votes of the existing PMC members are the ones that count, just like for a release.

Re: [DISCUSS] Move geode to the attic

Bumping this discussion onto the user@ list for visibility. > On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:49 AM, Owen Nichols > wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Once moved to the attic, it sounds like: > > * The geode github repo would become read-only (but remain world-readable > in perpetuity). > * Geode

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode 1.15.1.RC1

The vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes. @Owen - could you help finalize the release? Thanks, Anthony

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.15.1.RC1

I’m going to go ahead and close the vote since we have sufficient review. Anthony On Oct 6, 2022, at 6:15 AM, Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com.INVALID>> wrote: ⚠ External Email Mario, do you plan to close the vote soon? Anthony --- Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer<http

Re: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/ is shutting down

o know if they provide hardware resources on its own? I mention > it because it would be ideal to connect GH actions to that hardware so > executions would take less time. > > /Mario > > From: Anthony Baker > Sent: Thursday

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.15.1.RC1

Mario, do you plan to close the vote soon? Anthony --- Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer On September 29, 2022 at 5:36:39 AM PDT, Mario Kevo wrote: ⚠ External Email Hello Geode Dev Community, This is a release candidate for Apache Geode version 1.15.1.RC1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.15.1.RC1

+1 Reviewed source for binaries Built from source Ran tests with source and binary builds Anthony > On Sep 30, 2022, at 3:21 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > +1 - Ran dev-tools/release-testing/smoketest_rc.sh > > -Dan > > From: Mario Kevo >

https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/ is shutting down

At 3pm PST today the https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/ site will be shutting down. Apologies for the short notice, I just received this information today. As discussed on other threads, there are ASF-hosted CI alternatives. I’m happy to point any volunteers in the right direction.

Re: Release manager permissions

the same CI functionality as we have today, but they would be run on ASF provided resources which would most likely make the time to get results longer and less predictable. Is that correct? Thanks, Alberto ____ From: Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com.INVALID>>

Re: Release manager permissions

BTW, you should now have access to DockerHub and bulk change in JIRA. Anything else you need to create the 1.15.1 release candidate? Anthony > On Sep 26, 2022, at 8:55 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Looks like Docker is limiting access. I’ll need to rot

[ANNOUNCE] New project members

The Geode PMC is pleased to welcome Mario Kevo and Jakov Varenina as new PMC members. Jakov has also accepted an invitation to become a Committer. Welcome! As a reminder to all, ASF project roles [1] are based on earned merit, or contributions to a project. These contributions can take many

Re: Release manager permissions

would be run on ASF provided resources which would most likely make the time to get results longer and less predictable. Is that correct? Thanks, Alberto From: Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com.INVALID>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 8:1

Re: Odg: Release manager permissions

account and saw that I'm not authorized to run jobs. > Username: mkevo > > The username for Docker Hub is the same: mkevo. > > Thanks, > Mario > > ____ > Šalje: Anthony Baker > Poslano: 23. rujna 2022. 20:15 > Prima: dev@geode.apache.

Re: Release manager permissions

Just a reminder to all: we need to find an alternative to the VMware-sponsored CI pipelines currently in use. Any ideas? Should we try to resurrect the old ASF Jenkins jobs? Anthony > On Sep 23, 2022, at 3:26 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Hi devs, > > I need the following

Re: Release manager permissions

I updated your JIRA permission, please check. What is your DockerHub username? Anthony > On Sep 23, 2022, at 3:26 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Hi devs, > > I need the following permissions for the release manager: > > * bulk modification permission on Apache Geode JIRA

Re: Apache Geode 1.15.1 patch version

on.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-10076data=05%7C01%7Cbakera%40vmware.com%7Ce8179323a2ac46241d7e08da97137b34%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637988407188564545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%

Re: Apache Geode 1.15.1 patch version

Thanks Mario. I removed some entries from the list that didn’t seem relevant to a small patch release. I think previously Xu Weijie volunteered to look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-10415. Anthony On Sep 8, 2022, at 11:20 PM, Mario Kevo mailto:mario.k...@est.tech>> wrote: ⚠

Re: Release manager for 1.15.1?

14a024a2f93bb08da90391317%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637980872145197027%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7Csdata=f4%2BIdvol%2BolysK5XYg0EWVvrJWkVZ2wa6v83ltlIB04%3Dreserved=0 > > UK Registered No: 6517977 > > > > -Original Mes

Re: [DISCUSS] Opportunities to contribute

ternal Email Hi Anthony, I'm Weijie from China. I want participant release for v1.15.1. Is the task I need do that bump the dependency? Thanks. BRs/Xu Weijie -Original Message- From: Anthony Baker mailto:bak...@vmware.com>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 10:44 PM To: dev@geod

Re: Release manager for 1.15.1?

Note that we will want to bump some dependency versions in this patch release. If you would like to contribute this change, instructions can be found at https://github.com/apache/geode/tree/develop/dev-tools/dependencies. Anthony On Sep 2, 2022, at 9:27 AM, Anthony Baker mailto:bak

Release manager for 1.15.1?

Hi all, We need to ship a new Geode 1.15.1 patch to fix a few issues. Part of the Geode and ASF release process is identify a Release Manager to collect the changes, prepare a release candidate, and publish the release binaries. The good news is, we have a well-vetted set of scripts and

Re: [DISCUSS] Opportunities to contribute

Excellent! For these contributions you can just dive in, create the content, and publish it yourself. If you have questions feel free to ask on the mailing lists. Once your content is published let us know and we can link it appropriately. Here are a few examples:

[DISCUSS] Opportunities to contribute

Geode community, I want to inform you of some upcoming changes and opportunities. If you have been thinking about contributing to the Geode project, this is a great time to jump in and get started. Many of us in the Geode community are employed by VMware. While each of us participates and

Re: August board report draft

Last call for comments. > On Aug 9, 2022, at 10:34 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Here is a draft of the quarterly board report (note that board reports can > also be provided off-cycle when needed). Please let me know by EOD Thursday > if you have an

August board report draft

Here is a draft of the quarterly board report (note that board reports can also be provided off-cycle when needed). Please let me know by EOD Thursday if you have any changes / additions. Thanks, Anthony ## Description: The mission of Apache Geode is the creation and maintenance of software

Re: CODEOWNERS? (was Re: Pending PR reviews)

; part due to the way GitHub doesn’t provide enough information to determine > who is actually needed for review. > > From: Anthony Baker > Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 9:34 AM > To: dev@geode.apache.org > Subject: CODEOWNERS? (was Re: Pending PR reviews) > ⚠ External

CODEOWNERS? (was Re: Pending PR reviews)

I realize that this is a thread hijack, but hopefully a useful one. I’ve seen several requests for timely reviews in recent months. I think that the CODEOWNERS goals were important and laudable—directing review requests to those most suited to provide oversight—but the implementation has been

Re: [PROPOSAL] annul support/1.15

Owen, with all the recent work I think we are in an excellent position to resume work on the 1.15 release. While there are a few thing still outstanding, let’s go ahead and recut the release branch as of Monday, 2022-05-09. Would you be willing to resume release manager duties? @Everyone -

Re: Unable to run apache geode 1.14.4 instance

Are there any errors in the locator log? Did the locator log indicate that the locator started successfully? Anthony > On Mar 30, 2022, at 7:14 AM, Deepak Dixit wrote: > > ⚠ External Email > > Hello Dev Team, > > I am facing following issue while starting up Apache Geode 1.14.4 instance >

Re: Update the build to use Gradle 7.4

Hi Ryan, Welcome to Geode and thanks for the contribution! Anthony > On Feb 9, 2022, at 7:32 AM, Ryan Gardner wrote: > > Hello, > > Up-front disclaimer: I'm not a Gradle expert - but I spent a little time > poking around at what it would take to upgrade the build to go from Gradle > 6.8 ->

Re: Proposal: Cut 1.15 release branch from SHA 8f7193c827ee3198ae374101221c02039c70a561

Fair point, although my hope is that we continually and incrementally improve our code base on the /develop branch. Yes, there is an increased cost of back porting critical changes to support branches but the tradeoff is worth it IMHO. Anthony > On Jan 25, 2022, at 11:18 PM, Owen Nichols

Re: [VOTE] - Apache Geode Kafka Connector 1.1.0

Thanks Dan, makes sense. I have a “review artifacts for license compliance” on my todo list, but not likely to get done before the holidays :-) Anthony > On Dec 23, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Well, I haven't seen any votes on this and it's almost Christmas. Let's table > this

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal to pare down old-version testing

Interesting data point: 40% of maven central downloads last month were for version 1.4.0. Of course those numbers can be easily skewed by CI bots, but still! @Owen, I think your suggestion nicely improves practicality while continuing to support strong compatibility. In many cases it’s quite

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding LTGM as gating PR checks

Thanks Robert, I think this is important. I think this is a good first step. In future I think we should consider adding a CI job to ensure that pre-existing security errors are addressed. Perhaps GitHub code scanning is worth investigating since they have acquired the LGTM product. Anthony

Re: Question related to orphaned .drf files in disk-store

; max-oplog-size (1GB) and compaction-threshold (50%). > > BRs/Jakov > > On 02. 12. 2021. 17:06, Anthony Baker wrote: >> Related but different question: how many active oplogs do you normally see >> at one time? You may want to adjust the max-oplog-size if the default of 1 >> GB is too small. >>

Re: Question related to orphaned .drf files in disk-store

Related but different question: how many active oplogs do you normally see at one time? You may want to adjust the max-oplog-size if the default of 1 GB is too small. On Dec 2, 2021, at 1:11 AM, Jakov Varenina mailto:jakov.varen...@est.tech>> wrote: Hi Dan, We forget to mention that we

Re: Open socket handles build up over time (leaking?)

I’m curious - how do you assign a durable client id? The id should be unique to a client and not shared among a pool of clients. Anthony > On Nov 17, 2021, at 11:22 AM, Darrel Schneider wrote: > > I think you found the leak! > My understanding of the code in registerClientInternal (I'm

Re: Failed durable client connection initialization can sometimes leak client socket handle?

I just responded to your latest question, but if you have logs or a test case you could share that would be really helpful. Thanks, Anthony > On Nov 10, 2021, at 10:01 AM, Leon Finker wrote: > > Hi, > > In AcceptorImpl.run, the accepted client socket seems to only be > closed when there is

Re: Open socket handles build up over time (leaking?)

Hi, thanks for this report. Some questions to help us help you— - What OS for client and server? - Are you seeing the sockets clean up over time or do they persist until a reboot? - Does netstat give you any additional information about the sockets? Are any in TIME_WAIT status? - Do you have

Re: October Community Meeting

Looking forward to it! There has been some good discussion on query resource management [1] as well, perhaps we can pick up that topic another time if there sufficient interest. Anthony [1]

Re: Requesting eligibility for JIRA ticket assignment

Welcome Kaustubh! Please don’t hesitate to shout out if you have questions or need help. Anthony > On Sep 23, 2021, at 2:17 PM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > Hi Kaustubh, > > I have updated your permissions on the GEODE project, you now should be > able to edit and assign issues. > > Please let

Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization Efforts in General)

.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization > Efforts in General) > > Unfortunately I can’t do meetings that early. The earliest I could do that > day is 9am PDT. > >> On Sep 20, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Modularizing new WAN TX Batching (and Modularization Efforts in General)

The approach makes sense to me. The idea of a stable core + extensibility is a common and successful pattern in many OSS projects. @Jake, you want to discuss at the next Geode Community meeting in Oct? Anthony > On Sep 20, 2021, at 1:48 PM, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > Devs, > > We need to

ApacheCon: OLTP Application Data Services with Apache Geode

Don’t miss this great talk [1] by Gregory Green on Microservices with Apache Geode! Happens tomorrow at 7:10am PST / 14:10 UTC. From the abstract: Real-time transactions can be fast and furious. Think about building the next big retail market app. Users of the app need to get the answers as

Re: Reminder: Geode community meeting

Thanks to Patrick for a great presentation on how this new feature will make it easier to manage dependencies in server side code. The wiki page has a link to the recording if you missed it. Anthony > On Sep 8, 2021, at 1:07 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Hi all, > > Reminde

Reminder: Geode community meeting

Hi all, Reminder that tomorrow is a Geode community meeting. Patrick Johnson will be discussing his work on class loader isolation for user code. Join us at 8:00am Pacific (15:00 UTC)! Details here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Apache+Geode+Community+Meeting+Notes See

Re: Odg: NullPointerException while create region during server restart

C0%7C0%7C637613404734267138%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=viKM8UDdp5xydX0AcB03xte%2Bxsdv%2F0p68qXjyca1HW4%3Dreserved=0 > > Before this part of the code is executed it has that pdxRegistry is null, and > it throws the NPE in findDiskStore. > > > BR, > Mario

Re: NullPointerException while create region during server restart

When the NPE occurs, has the server completed its bootstrapping from cluster configuration yet? Anthony > On Jul 6, 2021, at 12:06 AM, Mario Kevo wrote: > > Hi Geode devs, > > I opened a new ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-9409 > regarding NullPointerException on

Re: CFP for ApacheCon 2021 closes in ONE WEEK

Hi Greg, great news! Forwarding your acceptance over to Rich and the ApacheCon planning team. Thanks! Anthony > On Jun 28, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Gregory Green wrote: > > Hello team, > > I do not see where I can accept the invite in the following link/info? > > Dear Gregory Green, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove stress-new-test-openjdk11 requirement from PRs

If we have consensus, no need to VOTE. > On Jun 9, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > Ok, I'm on board with changing stress-new-test from a required PR check to > non-required. It's simple, codeowners still have the final say, and it > neatly avoids the whole topic of overrides.

Fwd: [NOTICE] Git web site publishing to be done via .asf.yaml only as of July 1st

I believe we will need to update the geode-site repo. Begin forwarded message: From: Daniel Gruno Date: May 31, 2021 at 7:41:05 AM MDT To: Users Subject: [NOTICE] Git web site publishing to be done via .asf.yaml only as of July 1st Reply-To: priv...@geode.apache.org TL;DR: if your project

New PMC Chair [ was ASF Board Meeting Summary - May 19, 2021]

Hi everyone, please congratulate Dan Smith as the new PMC Chair [1] of Geode! Karen, thanks for your service! Anthony [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#chair > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Sander Striker > Subject: ASF Board Meeting

Re: Reminder to use draft mode

Side note: I think using discussion to achieve consensus on topics like this tends to work better than [VOTE] threads. If we fail to reach a consensus we can resort to a vote thread, or for reasons spelled out in [1]. IMHO, Anthony [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html On May

Re: JDK 16 Support?

Thanks for reporting this John. The next LTS version of Java (17) is due later this year. I think Geode needs to at least support every LTS version of Java and clearly we would need to fix errors like this. Do you see a need to support Java 16 now? Anthony On May 5, 2021, at 7:57 AM, John

Re: Region data corruption due to missing PdxTypes

Retaining local pox types in the client after a disconnect will cause problems as you observed. Take a look at the “ON_DISCONNECT_CLEAR_PDXTYPEIDS” property to improve this. Anthony > On May 4, 2021, at 4:36 AM, Mario Salazar de Torres > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > While debugging some

Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

, can be reproduce on geode, > if on existing connection, after request is sent, tcp reset is received. In > that case, at reception of reset > connection will be closed, and thread will get stuck while waiting on reply. > I will add reproduction steps in ticket. > > __

Re: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement

Do you have a tcpdump that demonstrates the packet loss? How long did you wait for TCP to retry the failed packet delivery (sometimes this can be tweaked with tcp_retries2). Does this manifest as a failed socket connection in geode? That ought to trigger some error handling IIRC. Anthony >

Re: [DISCUSS and NOMINATE] Time for a new Geode PMC Chair

Karen, thanks for taking on the role of PMC Chair for Geode over the last few years! The process for changing the Chair is outlined at [1]. The nominations and voting usually seem to occur on the PMC email list. I’ll start a thread on private@. Thanks, Anthony [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

I think for an active, healthy project community we need to balance two things that are somewhat oppositional: make it easy to contribute and ensure the project meets the needs of our users for stability and robust behaviors in the face of failures. > On Mar 17, 2021, at 9:45 AM, Jacob

Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback

Hi Alberto! I haven’t looked at PR review throughput metrics. I know that is certainly an interesting measure to keep an eye on w.r.t to the CODEOWNERS / CODEWATCHERS processes. I think another equally interesting metric is the “quality” of PR reviews. This is difficult to measure but you

Re: Need Access to apachegeode/geode-native-build on docker hub

Where are we hosting images for the geode (not the geode-native) pipeline? While it might make sense to use the same repo across the board, the images for geode-native and geode-site can be useful beyond just CI. I know I use the geode-native-build image to vet releases. Anthony > On Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] RFC - Add option to allow newer Geode clients to connect to older Geode servers

In my ideal world, the version represents the protocol version and not a product release number. As Dan points out, we could add a negotiation option to allow more flexibility between clients and servers. To accomplish this we would need a simpler and well-specified protocol. The current

Re: Geode Client jar dependencies

I great starting point for Geode micro services is the Spring Boot for Apache Geode project [1][2]. It’s already got all the dependencies sorted out. Anthony [1] https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot-data-geode [2] https://start.spring.io On Dec 14, 2020, at 5:48 AM, ankit Soni

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the default value of conserve-sockets to false

Udo, you’re correct that individual servers can set the property independently. I was assuming this is more like the ’security-manager` property and others that require all cluster members to be in agreement. I’m not sure I understand the use case to allow this setting to be per-member. That

Re: Requests taking too long if one member of the cluster fails

Yes, lowering the member timeout is one approach I’ve seen taken for applications that demand ultra low latency. These workloads need to provide not just low “average” or even p99 latency, but put a hard limit on the max value. When you do this you need to ensure coherency across at all

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the default value of conserve-sockets to false

BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000sdata=V65jEFWBflK8CWzFgxuFwQBD%2BV2BDlOlPa%2FtLR2N3eY%3Dreserved=0> > > ____ > From: Anthony Baker > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:57:33 PM > To: dev@geode.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the default va

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change the default value of conserve-sockets to false

I think there are many good reasons to flip the default value for this property. I do question whether requiring a user to allocate new hardware to support the changed resource requirements is appropriate for a minor version bump. In most cases I think that would come as an unwelcome surprise

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding CODEOWNERS to Apache Geode

+1 I think we as a project will need to iterator on the code owners as well as the process for code owners. But this is a model that has been adopted by a number of OSS projects both within and outside of Apache. I like that it provides visibility to PR authors and associates motivated

Re: apache-geode-1.13.0.tgz not found in LGTM analysis

Agreed…although snapshots will never be on Apache release mirrors. We do have alternate locations for builds that go through the CI pipelines we could use. Anthony On Nov 19, 2020, at 7:55 AM, Jacob Barrett mailto:jabarr...@vmware.com>> wrote: Ideally the develop branches of these other

Re: needs permission to push code to geode example repo

Hi Ashish! The best way to contribute is to open a PR via GitHub. LMK if you need help with that. What’s your JIRA username? Anthony > On Nov 18, 2020, at 10:54 AM, aashish choudhary > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > I am trying to add an example for geode rest api.I have the changes in my >

Re: Apache Geode 1.13.1 patch proposal

+1 definitely. Many of the changes are pretty critical—recovery deadlocks and TLS communication fixes. > On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > +1 sounds great! > > From: Dick Cavender > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 10:59 AM > To:

Re: Please review and contribute: draft of Nov 2020 Apache board report

Same, thanks Karen! On Nov 10, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Dave Barnes mailto:dbar...@apache.org>> wrote: LGTM

Re: PR process and etiquette

I think exploring these additions to PR reviews would be pretty helpful. It’s worth spending the extra time to get a PR right before merging. Anthony > On Oct 28, 2020, at 8:40 AM, Robert Houghton wrote: > > There are some pieces of Apache infrastructure we can control without needing >

Re: [PROPOSAL] backport GEODE-8651 to 1.13, 9.10, 9.9

+1 from me > On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Xiaojian Zhou wrote: > > Hi, all: > > The fix is to resolve a hang when Connection called notifyHandshakeWaiter the > 2nd time and cleared the NioFilter’s unwrapped buffer by mistake. > > The 2nd call should consider if the 1st call has finished

Fwd: Videos for ApacheCon Are Now Live

Great news, all the videos from the Geode track for ApacheCon @Home have been published [1]. Many thanks to all the speakers! Anthony [1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU2OcwpQkYCxKxd7dVETcwEtx5AEDIp1j Begin forwarded message: From: Brian Proffitt mailto:b...@apache.org>> Subject:

Re: [DISCUSS] Supported filename convention for Deploy Jars functionality

Given the wide variety of filenames possible do we even need a classification scheme? IOW, why not just take what the user gives us and say thank you :-). Is this restriction imposed by our *implementation* choices? Anthony > On Oct 7, 2020, at 3:24 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > Wait, that

Re: [Discussion] RFC to make Geode's working directory configurable

The plan around backwards compatibility makes sense to me. Anthony > On Oct 6, 2020, at 4:10 PM, Dale Emery wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > I spent more than a week scouring Gradle docs and code for any way to give > the parallel forks their own working directories. I couldn't find a way. At >

Fwd: [ATTN TRACK CHAIRS] Muse.dev bug bash

FYI, this might be cool. Please shout out if you’re interested and then follow the contact info below. Anthony > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Rich Bowen > Subject: [ATTN TRACK CHAIRS] Muse.dev bug bash > Date: September 24, 2020 at 6:32:09 AM PDT > To: "plann...@apachecon.com" >

Re: Clean C++ client metadata in timeouts

I’m not sure I have answers so I’ll just ask more questions :-) When a server is killed, does that provoke an asynchronous metadata update to clients? I could be wrong about that but if it IS true, then perhaps we should focus on optimizing that path. The sooner that a client can get accurate

[ANNOUNCE] Geode session track for ApacheCon @Home

HI all, With conferences going virtual due to current events, we have moved the former “Geode Summit” over to a dedicated track as part of the virtual ApacheCon event. Lucky for you, we have some great talk submissions on lots of interesting topics! The talks will be presented live

Re: JIRA issues for geode native developers

FWIW - Mike is listed on the committer roles of Geode [1]. Matthew is not yet. We typically offer JIRA permissions anytime someone asks to make it easier for them to contribute. Anthony [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/geode On Aug 21, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Dan Smith

Re: Draft of August 2020 Geode report to the board

Nice! I would also call out a significant increase in (awesome) community blog posts: https://medium.com/p/threads-used-in-apache-geode-function-execution-9dd707cf227c?source=email-9fb0d2d72e25--writer.postDistributed=bfb9703d4399c681a447389c689094af

Re: [PROPOSAL] one-time cleanup of stray and obsolete tags in geode repo

+1 with the exception of sga2-core. IIRC that is related to a code donation and should be preserved. All other tags you’ve listed seem reasonable to remove. I believe that tags in the rel/* are protected and will require an INFRA ticket. Anthony > On Jul 30, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Owen

Re: [VOTE] change Default branch for geode-examples to 'develop'

d.html/rfec15c0a7d5d6d57beed90868dbb53e3bfcaabca67589b28585556ee%40%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20510 On 7/14/20, 7:16 AM, "Anthony Baker" mailto:bak...@vmware.com>> wrote: Consider the use case of an application developer who wants to run geode-examples against the lates

Re: [VOTE] change Default branch for geode-examples to 'develop'

Consider the use case of an application developer who wants to run geode-examples against the latest geode release: 1) brew install apache-geode 2) git clone geode-examples 3) Get some runtime errors because geode-examples won’t connect to a previous geode release At this point, you have to do

Re: Flaky test caused by missing JDK dependency

I thought we made the dependency on the Attach API optional when we added support for JDK 11? Anthony > On Jul 8, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > To transition away from Attach API, the community needs a proposal to do so > and we'll need to deprecate the GFSH options that depend on

Re: API (Recommanded way) to get heap and disk usage for cluster nodes

Another option is JMX, see https://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/19/managing/management/list_of_mbeans.html. Anthony On Jul 8, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Jacob Barrett mailto:jabarr...@vmware.com>> wrote: Steve, Geode is in a transition from its on disk proprietary stats format to utilizing

Re: about Liberica JDK

Liberica is an OpenJDK distribution like AdoptOpenJDK, Oracle, RedHat, Amazon, Azul, etc. I have yet to find a behavioral difference between the distributions—it’s mostly about ease of acquiring binaries and LTS support. Just for simplicity I would prefer to use a single JDK distribution

Exciting news: Geode Summit + ApacheCon @Home

Hi everyone! Earlier this year VMware announced a Geode Summit as part of SpringOne [1]. Well, a lot has happened since then! Many tech conferences have gone virtual and SpringOne is no exception [2]. SpringOne is a great conference with a lot of excellent content. Unfortunately they have a

Re: Us vs Docker vs Gradle vs JUnit

When evaluating technical alternatives I think it’s helpful to look at data. Has anyone recently tried to run the entire dunit test suite in parallel w/o docker? How many tests need to be changed? IIRC, there would be non-trivial work in product code around statics and system properties as

Re: Fate of master branch

By just do it, I assume you mean: - Contact delete master where not needed - Rename master to main when needed - Contact INFRA to change the default branch - Update README and CI jobs as needed Across *all* geode repos. Anthony > On Jun 26, 2020, at 9:38 AM, Mark Hanson wrote: > > +1 to

Re: Fate of master branch

Let’s check all the repos: geode master is the latest released code work is done on develop (default branch) geode-benchmarks master is the latest released code work is done on develop (default branch) geode-dotnet-core-client master is the latest

Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization

That’s fine, I just want to understand what happens when I use this API: createdAuthenticatedView(…) Does it throw an exception? Silently work but not switch to the new user? Thanks, Anthony On Jun 19, 2020, at 10:14 AM, Jacob Barrett mailto:jabarr...@vmware.com>> wrote: 1) Multi-user

Re: Odg: Certificate Based Authorization

Hi Mario, just curious if you’ve made any progress on this as of yet. I have a few questions: 1) What is the implication for multi-user auth? Would this just become a no-op for this kind of SecurityManager implementation? See [1][2]. 2) I’m not sure that the CN is sufficiently general. What

Re: [INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results.

Thanks Mark! Can you highlight any surprises in these results compared to previous runs? Anthony > On Jun 10, 2020, at 10:59 PM, Mark Hanson wrote: > > Hello All, > > I have been doing bulk test runs of DistributedTestOpenJDK8, in this case > over 200. Here is a simplified report to kind

Re: [PROPOSAL] make Cluster Management Service CRUD operations thread safe

I think the first question to answer is: can simultaneous updates to configuration be made safely? Or what is the critical section of code that needs to be protected? Another thing to consider with dlocks is what happens in the failure case when the lock is not properly released. Does it

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >