-wet NEC limits.
Of course, our discussion is only hypothetical as the OP did not indicate
end-use safety standard and nor operating environment nor national market.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of John
Allen
Sent: Monday
Brian
Whilst I think I know what you may be getting at, the fact is that an output
considered to be SELV (Safety Extra Low Voltage, after all) of a correctly
designed and built Class I device which is connected to to a correctly
designed and grounded (earthed) supply building system will be safe
, inherently limited power,
etc). Local code requirements could also effect power source requirements.
Brian
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Piotr Galka
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 2:05 AM
To: EMC-PSTC
Subject: A very basic safety question.
All,
Consider
.
Now consider the 12V powered device connected to one of them.
Is that device CLASS III equipment in both cases?
Best Regards
Piotr Galka
MicroMade
Poland
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
All,
The Northeast Product Safety Society invites you to the 15th annual
Vendor’s Night to be held at the Boxborough Holiday Inn next Wednesday
evening, November 18th from 5:00 to 9:30 PM. Vendor's Night is
opportunity to get answers to all your product safety/EMC questions in
one evening
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf
Of ce-test,
qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:08 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Safety reqs for Lamps
Hello group,
A low voltage safety question
Hello group,
A low voltage safety question
I am familiar with the requirements of the EC market for
luminaries, but still have to learn something for the USA and Canada market.
The product in question is a decorative lamp of multiples PE sheeting
(vertically) enclosing a standard tungsten
All,
The Northeast Product Safety Society invites you to the 15th annual
Vendor’s Night to be held at the Boxborough Holiday Inn on Wednesday
evening, November 18th from 5:00 to 9:30 PM. Vendor's Night is
opportunity to get answers to all your product safety/EMC questions in
one evening
All,
The scheduled October 28th NPSS meeting is cancelled.
We hope you will join us at the 2009 Vendors Night on November 18th at
the Boxborough Holiday Inn.
If you or anyone you know would like to give a product safety technical
presentation, please contact Steve Brody by email at
steven.br
All,
The scheduled October 28th NPSS meeting is canceled.
We hope you will join us at the 2009 Vendors Night on November 18th at
the Boxborough Holiday Inn.
If you or anyone you know would like to give a product safety technical
presentation, please contact Steve Brody by email at
steven.br
All,
The scheduled October 28th NPSS meeting is cancelled.
We hope you will join us at the 2009 Vendors Night on November 18th at
the Boxborough Holiday Inn.
If you or anyone you know would like to give a product safety technical
presentation, please contact Steve Brody by email at
steven.br
, October 05, 2009 10:57 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Product Safety Engineer Position in San Diego
Req 130468
Safety Engineer
Location: San Diego, CA
Position Summary:
This position is for a Product Safety Engineer within the Platform
Hardware Development group. This position is responsible
Req 130468
Safety Engineer
Location: San Diego, CA
Position Summary:
This position is for a Product Safety Engineer within the Platform
Hardware Development group. This position is responsible for the
planning, testing, working with safety agencies and achieving product
safety certifications
if there is anyone from the Canadian Standards
Association you would recommend me connecting with.
Summary
RIM Testing Services has an opening for a Product Safety Compliance
Specialist. The keys are Product Safety Requirements for ITE
(Information Technology Equipment) i.e. BlackBerry
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting today, September 23rd, at the Holiday Inn,
Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at
7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Matt Cusson,
Siemens
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting next Wednesday, September 23rd, at the
Holiday Inn, Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will
begin at 7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. Matt
Cusson
, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http
: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:54 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Standard for AC breaker trip curve - [safety]
Greetings members.
Can someone point me to the “basic” standard that would be the
foundation
for household circuit breaker trip
__
Curtis Bender | curtis.ben...@tennantco.com
Opinions expressed here are my own and do not reflect those of my empolyeer
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list
and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p
Hi All,
Is that John waxing lyrical again? :-)
Regards
Tim
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: 03 August 2009 14:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Workplace Safety Rules
*** WARNING ***
This message has
UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used
Subject: Re: Workplace Safety Rules
If the inspector is not trained and documented as trained, they cannot enter
the inner dangerous parts of the lab. Or they have to wait until the lab is
made safe for them.
You can't let just anybody into the hazardous areas.
- Bill
John,
Since you mentioned tea-lights, I had to share this story...
We have a rental cabin in the mountains and for safety concerns we
purchased some of the battery powered candles to keep guests from
accidently burning the place down. Ironically, it only took about 2
months for someone
: Re: [PSES] Workplace Safety Rules
There's no end to the dangers around us. I recently purchased a spray
nozzle for a garden hose, and it had a label saying:
CAUTION:
Shock Hazard: Do not spray near electricity.
Detach from faucet during freezing weather.
This product intended for outdoor
PM
Subject: Workplace Safety Rules
I like to know this group's experiences regarding the following,
which has been put into my lap to resolve.
Our plant manager recently arranged a class on electrical safety
(based on OSHA regulations and the NFPA 70E standard) for our
engineering
/2009 04:01 PM
Please respond to
Philo Beddo ashwort...@yahoo.com
To
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
cc
Subject
Re: [PSES] Workplace Safety Rules
John,
I work in the EHS organization of my company. We've had to evaluate our
lab's Best Practices against the OSHA requirements
McCallum
Subject: Re: Workplace Safety Rules
I expect shortly someone will need me to affix an A4 paper at my monitor
saying Monitor screen. Read here what computer tells you.
Best Regards
Piotr Galka
MicroMade
Poland
- Original Message -
From: Flavin, John
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:56 PM
Subject: Workplace Safety Rules
I like to know this group's experiences regarding the following, which
has
been put into my lap to resolve.
Our plant manager recently arranged a class on electrical safety
, John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk wrote:
From: John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: Workplace Safety Rules
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 4:10 PM
In message E4C83436DF3D724A8D70992643
. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send
John,
I work in the EHS organization of my company. We've had to evaluate our
lab's Best Practices against the OSHA requirements. In English, how we
handle power and safety while performing EMC and safety testing. The biggest
issue at hand was exposed connectors on LISN's and breakout
quite quickly.
That said, an independent review of safety will almost always throw
up some opportunities for change which will improve safety in your
products and operations. Double insulation (particularly if the outer
layer is a different colour to the inner layer) will make it easy to
see
I like to know this group's experiences regarding the following, which has
been put into my lap to resolve.
Our plant manager recently arranged a class on electrical safety (based on
OSHA regulations and the NFPA 70E standard) for our engineering staff who work
in all of our labs
To: IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC
safety with respect to fire, flammability and toxic chemicals.
Again is there a service that provides notice of changes
or where one
can obtain world wide related regulation information such as that
provided by EIA Track for environmental issues?
Regards
for an
offline discussion.
-Original Message-
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Denis
Ryskamp
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:21 AM
To: IEEE EMC SAFETY PSTC
safety with respect to fire, flammability and toxic chemicals.
Again is there a service
.
Is there a service that will give a heads-up well in advance so that
one can plan (and justify) such product retesting?
-Currently, safety compliance for data and power cables (some cables are
large diameter and several hundred feet long) are the issue.
Understanding is that for aircraft, the FAA flammability
right of the
display. No-one tells you that!
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Nick, all,
Thanks for the information.
Can we look forward to photographs of the signatory in the DoC to aid
identification as well?
Regards
Tim
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Nick
Williams
Sent: 03 July 2009 08:22
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: New toy safety
Some members of this list may be interested to know that a new toy
safety directive was published in the OJ on Tuesday this week.
Directive 2009/48/EC replaces 88/378/EEC from 20 July 2011.
So far as I can see on the basis of a quick read, the practical
differences between the old and new
]
Sent: 16 June 2009 16:19
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] U.S. Medical Device Safety Act
Perhaps I did not understand the proposed legislation.
My interpretation is, regardless of FDA and NRTL assessments and
certification, that the failure of a fully conforming device will make
.
Please comment if I am not correct.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Andy Clifford [mailto:andy.cliff...@conformance.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 8:06 AM
To: 'Brian O'Connell'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] U.S. Medical Device Safety Act
Due to the new
Due to the new Medical Device Safety Act 2009, I might expect the risk
assessment requirements of the 3rd edition to become more important, since
the FDA, who may now share in a manufacturer's liability by approving test
reports, will need more effort from manufacturers in order to demonstrate
- like Dr Strangelove fighting
his own arm...
R/S,
Brian
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http
, May 22, 2009 7:00 AM
To: r...@weichels.dk; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: IEC 61010-1 safety standard question
Hi Peter:
A couple of quick points from my perspective.
Note that in figure 6 (61010-1, second edition) the baffle overlap distance
needs to be a least 1 inch (Y = twice X
luck.
Richard
Richard Payne
Tektronix, Inc.
Product Safety Engineering
V: (503) 627-1820
F: (503) 627-3838
E: richard.pa...@tektronix.com mailto:richard.pa...@tektronix.com
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:22 PM
-
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl
To: Peter mailto:r...@weichels.dk
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: IEC 61010-1 safety standard question
I do not see an gap in your drawing
Test is a difficult test to
comply with
Peter Merguerian
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Peter r...@weichels.dk wrote:
From: Peter r...@weichels.dk
Subject: IEC 61010-1 safety standard question
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 10:34 AM
to make a drawing (best seen using non proportional font)
Hope this is somewhat clear, have a nice day :-)
Best regards
Peter
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All
from the same source), because it is the
same situation: input in range, output out of range.
Best Regards
Piotr Galka
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc
...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Piotr Galka
Sent: 14 May 2009 08:23
To: EMC-PSTC; John Harrington
Subject: Re: Safety above 1500 V dc
John,
Thanks for the feedback. I was looking at the wording of the LVD
guidance
document which states
Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted
. Is this a wrong interpretation?
If the 230V powered device with output over 1500V is out of LVD than also 9V
power supply is out of LVD - the same situation.
Piotr Galka.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats
: RE: Safety above 1500 V dc
John
I do not believe that there is any Directive governing that. Electricity
supplies 1500V are generally outwith the Low Voltage public distribution
network, and connection would be governed by the supply authority.
If you are considering outputs from equipment 1500V
Subject: RE: Safety above 1500 V dc
John
I do not believe that there is any Directive governing that.
Electricity supplies 1500V are generally outwith the Low Voltage
public distribution network, and connection would be governed by the
supply authority.
If you are considering outputs from
: RE: Safety above 1500 V dc
John
I do not believe that there is any Directive governing that. Electricity
supplies 1500V are generally outwith the Low Voltage public distribution
network, and connection would be governed by the supply authority.
If you are considering outputs from equipment
...@ieee.org
Subject: Safety above 1500 V dc
Hi All
In Europe the LVD covers equipment rated up to 1500 V dc. Which directive
applies to equipment rated above 1500 V?
Thanks
John Harrington
Compliance Engineer
Keithley Instruments, Inc.
jharring...@keithley.com
Tel: 440 498 2727
_
Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For
more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
Dear Colleagues;
Can I thank all those who replied to my question regarding the availability of
a safety testing lab located in the Memphis area?
I now have enough information to proceed.
Kind regards;
Ian McBurney.
Allen Heath Ltd.
email:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com
P Please
Dear colleagues;
Can anyone let me know if there is a safety testing lab in the Memphis
Tennessee area of the USA that can test audio products (mainly professional)
to UL60065 CAN/CSA C22.2 No 60065-03 and apply a recognised mark e.g. UL,
ETL, TUV etc.
Thanks in advance;
Ian McBurney
...@echostar.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 8:55 AM
To: Ted Eckert; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: Safety: Japan PSE vs UL Power Cords and Japan CB Cert to IEC 1010
Isn’t it more efficient to have a detachable cord (i.e. an AC connector) and
locally source the line cord
: RE: Safety: Japan PSE vs UL Power Cords and Japan CB Cert to IEC 1010
My previous employer purchased UL/CSA/PSE cords from a number of vendors. It
is possible to design a cord that meets the requirements of North America and
Japan. However, as Peter Merguerian noted, it is expensive. The sales
.
From: peter merguerian [mailto:pmerguerian2...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 7:20 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Safety: Japan PSE vs UL Power Cords and Japan CB Cert to IEC 1010
Jeff,
The standard for cords and plugs are different than in the US
are not covered by Denan) and requires a PSE Mark, the invertor
can be tested for compliance with Japanese Appedix 8 standard that covers
various electrical equipment for safety and emc. If invertor is not covered by
Denan and does not require the PSE Mark, you can approach a Japanese
certification body like TUV
. You can get a form from UL for
this. You will need to fill it out, then ask your OEM
to fill in his parts, then submit it to UL. Then, you
can get access to UL for the OEM product, and UL will
talk to you.
Best regards,
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: a question on safety report formats
Hi George:
Since it was a UL report, I called UL to talk about it, however, they were
only able to respond that they couldn’t comment on the report because it’s
the proprietary information of a customer
Group,
( Sleepless in Japan )
I'm having a hard time finding a standard 120VAC 15 amp, 18 AWG power cord
with both the UL and PSE Safety Marks. I've tried several power cord
manufacturers and they state this combo does not exist. If so why not I
have power supplies that are both PSE
There is a specific reason for the content and structure of product safety
reports in general, and UL FUS reports in particular.
Older reports are stored as separate image and/or rtf files; where the
construction details (which become the 'FUS' report) are separate from
each test data file. UL
is sorting this out.
br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety Regulatory Consultant
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201fone/fax
p.perk...@ieee.org
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message
Hi Folks,
When I recently asked an OEM for a UL EN60950-1 safety report for an ITE
product, instead of the usual single PDF, compiled with all the required
sections, I got a zip file containing all the sections as loose-leaf rtf and
jpg documents. In this case, there were sections from
All,
The scheduled April 22nd NPSS meeting is cancelled as our scheduled
speaker will not be available for the NPSS meeting due to other
commitments
If you or anyone you know would like to give a product safety technical
presentation, please contact Steve Brody by email at
steven.br
Dear all,
is anybody aware of scientific data or technical standards giving
information on safety limits for vacuum (suction) in medical
applications, specifically for skin suction?
Thanks,
Paolo Peruzzi
Regulatory Medical RD
El.En. S.p.A.
Via Baldanzese, 17
50041 Calenzano (FI)
Italy
Tel
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting today, March 25th, at the Holiday Inn,
Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin at
7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. John M.
Freudenberg
All,
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting on Wednesday, March 25th, at the Holiday
Inn, Boxborough MA. A social hour with light refreshments will begin
at 7:00 PM and the technical meeting will start at 7:30 PM. John M.
Freudenberg
Thanks for info Joe
From: Joe Randolph [mailto:j...@randolph-telecom.com]
Sent: 11 March 2009 18:32
To: Petrie, Craig D; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Indian Product Safety Standards
On 3/11/2009, Craig Petrie wrote:
Are there any product safety
On 3/11/2009, Craig Petrie wrote:
Are there any product safety standards which apply to IT equipment to
be sold
for Indian market? Are there some minimum mandatory requirements? My web
trawl so far has turned up no mandatory requirements.
Hi Craig:
I know that for telecom
Good afternoon,
Are there any product safety standards which apply to IT equipment to be sold
for Indian market? Are there some minimum mandatory requirements? My web
trawl so far has turned up no mandatory requirements.
Regards,
Craig
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
: Re: Australia C-Tick and safety requirements
Hi Dan:
As far as question 2 is concerned (line frequency devices CISPR 22),
CISPR 22 does address it.
The Introduction says:
The scope is extended to the whole radio-frequency range from 9 kHz to
400 GHz, . . . . 50Hz is below the range.
It also
All,
NOTE - The NORTHEAST PRODUCT SAFETY SOCIETY has a new web address –
WWW.NEPSS.NET. Please make sure you change your shortcuts and links or
you will miss out on all we have to offer!
There will be a Northeast Product Safety Society / CNEC Product Safety
Engineering Society meeting tomorrow
All,
A couple of clarifications may be helpful.
EMC Requirements
Australian EMC regulations do not include any 'product safety' requirements.
As such, the Compliance Folder for EMC should include:
* a DoC declaring compliance with currently acceptable versions of AS/NZS
CISPR 22
a safety report, I believe it’s a good idea to include one anyway, but
that’s a preference and not a requirement.
Dan,
I hope you can now answer your friend’s questions.
Best regards,
Ron Pickard
ron.pick...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
Ron,
I absolutely support your recommendation to include a safety test report in an
EMC Compliance Folder anyway.
That is my recommendation to anyone also.
Best regards,
Kevin Richardson
Stanimore Pty Limited
Compliance Advice Solutions for Technology
(Legislation/Regulations/Standards
Hi Jim,
A declaration of conformity is required under the EMC regs, but not the safety
regs.
Under the safety regs there are two main categories of product in Australia,
prescribed and non-prescribed. For prescribed equipment to be legally sold it
must be approved by a recognised authority
Hi Ron,
The ACMA normally only audit for EMC, C-Tick, radiocommunications and similar
issues not involving safety. However, where a RCM (Regulatory Compliance Mark)
declaration has been made this is audited by the ACMA.
The RCM involves both safety and EMC, and the problem is that most ACMA
components (some coils,
caps, and MOVs).
1. Does the C-Tick mark for non-telecom equipment require both
EMC and safety declarations? I know that for the telecom equipment
my company produces, the ACA requires telecom, safety, and EMC (A-
tick and C-tick) but I don’t know if the safety
. Does the C-Tick mark for non-telecom equipment require both EMC and
safety declarations? I know that for the telecom equipment my company
produces, the ACA requires telecom, safety, and EMC (A-tick and C-tick) but I
don’t know if the safety portion is a telecom specific requirement
For safety, this is not a perscribed equipment and therefore does not require
a safety approval from a state authority
However, the product must still comply with the Australia safety requirements
in AS/NZS 60950.1. This standard is harmonized with IEC60950-1 so if you
comply with the standard
calls out AS/NZS 60950 for Telco equipment.
The Radiocommunications Labeling (EMC) Notice 2008 which covers ITE does not
call out AS/NZS 60950.
You also wrote does not require a safety approval from a state authority.
Do mean AS/NZS 60950 testing must be done at an approved lab and then cite
/emcbook.pdf
The ACMA does not impose safety requirements for C-tick (ACMA) or RCM
(Regulatory Compliance Mark, owned by AU NZ regulators) markings, but I
believe the “state authorities” that Peter refers to do and are the
provincial electrical authorities (refer to Appendix D) which must
Dan,
You will need to consult the Electrical Safety Act 2002
Non-prescribed electrical equipment
A person who sells non-prescribed electrical equipment must comply with
section 120 of the Regulation. Generally speaking all non-prescribed
electrical equipment must comply with the safety
of electrical products in CSA C22.1-2009, Section 0, or in the 26th
edition of the Ontario Electrical Code), 1) you must be registered and
2) if the same product is sold elsewhere in the world, and you are
aware of a safety problem with it, then you are required to inform ESA
of the problem
...@intermec.com mailto:ron.pick...@intermec.com
From: Doug Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:10 PM
To: Pickard, Ron
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Ontario, Canada safety regulation 438/07
Ron,
I think you're giving ESA
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: Ontario, Canada safety regulation 438/07
Dan,
I wish that ESA had that much of a sense of humour, but I doubt it!
Canadian Provinces are not very good at copying ideas from each other,
so I doubt that you will see a run of copy-cat legislation in the
other
://www.linkedin.com/in/dougnix
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics
fax (519) 653-1318
Find me LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougnix
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
emc-p...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web
-
From: Gawrzyjal, Kazimier
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
To: 'Doug Nix'; Brian O'Connell
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Ontario, Canada safety regulation 438/07
Doug, Brian,
ESA WG6 recommendations (see option 4):
http://esasafe.com/pdf/wg
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Things can always get better. But that's not the only option.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail
in the Cons column outlining option 4 in the WG6 document I
refer to below.
Regards,
Kaz
From: Gawrzyjal, Kazimier
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:30 PM
To: 'Doug Nix'; Brian O'Connell
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Ontario, Canada safety regulation 438/07
Doug, Brian,
ESA WG6 recommendations
, 2009 11:52 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: Ontario, Canada safety regulation 438/07
Hi Kaz et al,
Aside from the bureaucratic revenue generating machine ESA is
creating, I'm wondering, would this is the first government
mandated regulation that could be construed as introducing HBSE
to some
1201 - 1300 of 3451 matches
Mail list logo
