FAQ
On 3/5/03 5:48, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone
How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4
Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our
migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us
change our domain name from London_city to londoncity
without
Completely uninstall NAV and see if things come back up...
On 3/5/03 9:16, Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm looking for some assistance.
Ex5.5 SP4 on W2K SP3 1 Gig Mem NAV 2.12 in MAPI/VAPI Mode
Yesterday @ 2:58 NAV started reporting errors in the application log,
Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of assistance
one can provide, but if on initial connection the error you receive is 572,
it doesn't appear to be a problem on your end, assuming mail.xx.com is
actually the Mx record for that domain.
On 3/5/03 9:38, Gregory
Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problems Emailing one Domain
Not having the actual domain name severely limits the level of
assistance
one
The more substantial risk IMHO is in Human Engineering exploits of your
business. I've certainly gotten more than enough information in OOA
responses to attempt such a thing.
Snopes underestimates the difficulty of matching names to addresses,
especially when working with known domains. (e.g.
http://is.curtin.edu.au/help/hfiles/hfile01.htm
Conversion failure of attachment, resulting in undeliverable messages
If an Office document attached to an email message has been edited and saved
while attached to the message, the message may be returned undeliverable
when sent to a user
This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the
internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop.
I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all
of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them
Possibly an offshoot of the inability to accurately report mailbox sizes
over 2GB in the UI?
On 3/5/03 14:24, Matt Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine the limit is there due to the fact that an OST file is
the same as a PST file in regards to maximum size. Beyond that, would
you
Ah... Forgot to run NTDSNoMatch eh? You can disconnect a mailbox and connect
it to another. Then disconnect the disabled mailbox enabled user account
which has your mailbox and connect it to your own.
On 3/5/03 19:43, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone
This is done on the SMTP virtual server. Out of the box, only authenticated
users are allowed to relay. You can allow an IP or group of IPs to relay on
the relay restrictions button I believe.
On 3/5/03 21:20, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 5.5 I was able to lock the system down so that
I found this to be fairly useful...
http://www.davidco.com/products.php
http://www.davidco.com/productDetail.php?id=43IDoption=9SID=55ce07dfb7c781
2cb4303fac4fdae315
Of course like any system, working it is the most important component.
On 3/4/03 8:25, Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going
via
another IMS at another company
Which logs are these?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
What do the event logs say?
On 3/4/03 9:38, Niki Blowfield - Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34
I believe you've gained additional information for the 'things not to do in
Exchange' list. Sorry. :(
On 3/3/03 22:43, Jean-Francois Bourdeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XADM: Cannot Move Servers Between Administrative Groups in Exchange 2000
Server
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=261170
DNS configuration problem?
On 3/3/03 8:03, Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added a new server to our site, I moved Mailboxes to it and now it
appears that those mailboxes are only able to send and receive messages
to people that are on their Server. After about 12 hours I get a
Install and SSL certificate.
Map port 443 on the external firewall interface to the internal IP address
of the intranet server.
Assign a DNS name to the external IP address if one doesn't already exist
for it.
Connect to https://dns_name/exchange
On 2/28/03 6:14, Eve Jimah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The phrasing of the question and terms used based on the question as asked
are ambiguous. Delegate permissions is sufficient for 'send on behalf of'
rights, if that checkbox is marked. Send As permissions are another set of
permissions and can only be granted via the Exchange admin.
On 2/28/03
What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the
admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused..
In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it.
On 2/28/03 15:31, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone put these two together? I work
On 2/28/03 17:40, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can get around the security prompt if you make the COM addin trusted
within the form in the public folder. I take it you haven't done this
then...
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm
I'm aware of the
. AFAIK that script
is still running at the company where I installed it and building the DLs
nightly.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
Have them send as the second account using a client configured with the
secondary SMTP address (e.g. OE). Create a web form to allow them to send.
On 2/27/03 3:10, Andrew Hedges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are in the process of migrating a third party from Notes 5 to Exchange
5.5. As
Use restricted address book views.
On 2/27/03 6:14, Vas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Quick question, I have added another Recipients group in Exchange 5.5. Is
there anyway to exclude these mailbox's/users from the Global Address list
Cheers
Vas Constantinou MCP
No version of Outlook (nor do most mail clients) support the inclusion of
the attachment in replies. When you forward a message with an attachment
what behavior do you see?
On 2/27/03 7:04, Elmerick, Ralph H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that OWA supports the sending and receiving of
Crmb-s.zip http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm
On 2/27/03 7:37, Cartier, Quentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In order to create mailboxes, I set LDAP attributes in ADS, relying on RUS
that actually creates the mailboxes.
Only, it seems that the Mailbox Rights are not set correctly when the
You can change domains or add additional domains to individual users
mailboxes but there's nothing that will stop anyone who wanted to from
forging mail as coming from your domain if they like. This is the nature of
SMTP.
On 2/27/03 8:02, Dave Vantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several weeks
Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR...
On 2/27/03 8:49, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
We have a situation where exchange 5.5 users are subscribed to a list as
supplied by a unix listmanager. When a message is sent to this list, there
are 240 members, there always seem to be
!!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2003 15:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Failed delivery
Perhaps if you posted a sample DNR...
On 2/27/03 8:49, Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
We have a situation where
If you edit the items being imported, you can set their time to busy.
On 2/27/03 12:56, Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I could find. Under the calendar options all I have is Show week
numbers in the date Navigator, use Microsoft Schedule+ as my primary
calendar - grayed
and end date the second field. I tried
to put in Busy in the third but that didn't work. I have looked at MS site
and did a google search.
TIA,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Take exception all you like, for the vast majority of companies involved
in health care, patient information is not a priority
Are these CRs alternate recipients for mailboxes?
On 2/26/03 11:06, Michael Ahlfont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example the email that you sent to me I recieved in my mailbox and a
copy is sent to my yahoo account. This copy is duplicated. If this email was
internal it would not be
On 2/26/03 11:30, Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just my opinion on why it happened. From what I understand a few
bad apples had some mishaps with patient information, the media gets a
hold of this, blows it out of proportion,
Blows what out of proportion? Insufficient
Given the restraints imposed... Write a server side script to send a
notification including the details deemed relevant.
On 2/25/03 3:09, Green, Jacky {PGI~Welwyn} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have set up several moderated calendars that are accessible via the Public
Folders (running
Friggin Lyris
Remove the sendmail server from the mix and have mail delivered directly to
the Exchange server... Does the problem persist?
On 2/25/03 9:15, Insite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, there is only one way in, the incoming mail bounce at a Sendmail
server that just passes the
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224s=easterbrook022403, but the idea
of needing to use nuclear power plants to product the levels of hydrogen
needed for 'clean fuel cells' seems to make the water is the only
byproduct argument a bit disingenuous.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: Exchange server level encryption-OT
Not an expert on the science behind this essay
http://tnr.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030224
Like the usernames and passwords wouldn't still be sent in plain text. lol
On 2/24/03 1:05, Keith Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One option regardless of port mapping is to hide the exchange access deep
down in some cryptic folder structure, to access you then have a url like
:52, Keith Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
er. yes, but you can use https for that (anyone know of a free cert
provider?).
The point was that it sounded like the guy wanted to 'hide' his OWA
implementation, and this is one way of doing so.
Keith.
-Original Message-
From: Chris
What's the underlying objective?
On 2/24/03 10:38, Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I am wondering if anyone can help me with this request...
I am trying to find out if there's a way to retrieve calendar permission
list from a mailbox. I have several thousands mailboxes and I need
wants to know how many people's calendar this user has access to
for some reason, but I can't tell you for what...
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange
Perhaps if you had mentioned the troubleshooting steps you'd taken so far,
poor Jacob would not have wasted his valuable time telling you to do
something you had already done.
On 2/24/03 15:16, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could not find any error in the event logs and I have
That would be a better solution, best is subject to some debate. Simply
using SSL for all of the protocols in question would likely be better as
well.
On 2/22/03 10:52, Ryan Finnesey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would the best solution be to use a ISA Box and also a PIX?
Ryan,
-Original
Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out
ZipOut http://www.microeye.com
On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello
of outlook 97.
Thank you
Cheers!
Carine
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Files zipped when sent out
ZipOut http://www.microeye.com
On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim
We had the same thing as you silly.
On 2/21/03 9:04, Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could at least tell us what you had for lunch.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:01
IIRC there is a solution for Ol2K as well... Included in an SR or on the
officeupdate site? www.slipstick.com probably has a link. One would think
that a combination of the last good backup of the PST file + Deleted Items
Retention would have made the tale of woe unnecessary. Not that $500 is
Assuming you have an NT4 domain infrastructure yes.
On 2/20/03 10:23, Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Exchange 5.5 SP4
We have a backup recover system we built to recover mailboxes. It's running
2000 and we have been able to restore to it, but we have had two
ZipOut http://www.microeye.com
On 2/20/03 22:57, Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Everyone,
May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which
will automatically zip files when sent out.!
Thank you
Cheers!
Carine
I was thinking exactly the same thing. Well, that and that I wouldn't be
using a site connector over the Internet.
On 2/18/03 8:04, Tristan Gayford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use a VPN for this scenario every time.
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems
And PF Permissions, custom permissions on folders (similar to delegate
permissions Tristan mentioned), replying to old e-mails, modifying
reoccurring meeting requests, synchronization of OST files, downloading of
OAB files, etc. Green Field migrations are nice when you can get them, but
there's a
This has been discussed 20+ times in the last 6 months, check your archives
for some excellent insight on this topic.
On 2/18/03 11:14, Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSX2000+SP3
1forest,1Org
We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current
Other than the Q article in the URL referenced below?
On 2/18/03 19:16, Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Those steps seems to be ok if the servername will be different, in this case
the server name must stay the same because this client routes their emails
Add an entry to the list of 'hosts and clients with these IP addresses' for
the IP address of the host to relay.
On 2/17/03 12:18, Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having difficulty finding information on this either in MS's
Knowledgebase or in the various books I have:
We have
That sounds correct and would be consistent with past behavior.
On 2/17/03 16:22, Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scenario 1: If you use Titanium front-end OWA server and access mailboxes on
Ex2000, you get the Ex2000 OWA interface (not the E3k rich or basic).
Scenario 2: If
-1018 error point towards hardware errors on the server. Make sure you have
the latest bios, drivers and firmware for your hardware and contact the HW
vendor for additional support if needed.
On 2/16/03 20:34, Phil Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
We're currently testing our planned
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected
I'd swing to 5.5 and then swing back to an upgraded E2K server. No hard
reason why, just feels better all other things being equal.
On 2/13/03 13:17, Joe Pochedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the very beginning of the year I finally managed to install Win2k and AD
into our environment (more
Archives.
On 2/11/03 20:28, Anthony Roark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange,
I have many rules set in outlook. After activating all of them I get
the following message: there is insufficient space to store all of
your rules. Once I re-open the Rules Wizard I notice some rules have
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected to and that
server is also not a gateway for it. Either your DNS is fscked or one or
more of their Mx records is improperly configured. Using telnet and the
basic SMTP
Outlook? www.slipstick.com
On 2/12/03 9:27, Tony Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just install Outlook 2000 and when I open Outlook to config for
Exchange the Services is not there. I was looking under Tools menu. Right
now it show account. When do I need to install? I have been
I should hope so.
On 2/12/03 10:35, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Liddil would like to recall the message, IIScan / exmerge.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Not sure who suggested that, but I'd put them on the short list for the next
layoffs.
On 2/12/03 10:22, HOLLIDAY, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a remote office connected via T1. They have their own server
(Exch2k Enterprise SP3 , Win2k Server SP3), and the database is close to
Is slipstick.com down?
On 2/12/03 10:40, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok I found that the .txt file needs updating. How can I do this from
Exchange 2000 to all clients?
Jim Liddil
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:37 AM
To:
NoOST=3
On 2/12/03 11:46, McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 5.5. Windows 2000, Outlook 2000.
I have a user that keeps getting a synchronization error message..
7:46:32 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
7:46:32 Error synchronizing message 'Network Team Staff'
7:46:32
). Any suggestions on how to use the info in rfc821 to
determine what the issue is and why it is sporadic? Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
of the site.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange
MessageOne
Emergency Messaging System: http://www.messageone.com/EMS.asp
Free Custom OWA Screens:http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp
On 2/11/03 6:56, Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list
We have Exchange Server 2000
Why would anyone want to do this exactly?
On 2/7/03 16:10, Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSX2000+sp3
1 Org
Hi All
We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to
rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems
What the is a pfbackup utility? Is it some 3rd party product? If so, what
does the vendor say?
On 2/10/03 2:12, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pfbackup is installed but not showing up in the outlook file menu
Does any one know how to manually remove the pfbackup utility from
Roflmao somewhere a firewall admin needs a beatin.
On 2/10/03 8:24, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a firewall smtp filter (say, WatchGuard) was stripping the MIME Headers
off of all outgoing emails, would this effectively strip off the
attachments? Ever since our partner company
SIS support is nice, but still not necessary for my needs.
On 2/10/03 12:51, James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Internet.com said this got rejected. So I'll try again.
I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 =
hours
on the phone with veritas fixing
www.slipstick.com www.slovaktech.com writes solutions like this for
customers all the time. Mention my name and get my standard 0% discount.
On 2/10/03 18:19, Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to create a public contacts folder that contains the contacts
from a custom
Yes, that's one of the products listed at the URL I mentioned.
On 2/11/03 10:22, TWU-Durham, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.doubletake.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange replication as fallback server
www.doubletake.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange replication as fallback server
A personal folders tool? Bah Who would need one of those?
On 2/11/03 11:19, Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's from MS
http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/pfbackup.aspx
What the is a pfbackup utility? Is it some 3rd party product? If so, what
does the vendor say?
I use domain\username for my authentication and it works just fine. Haven't
tried it with the SMTP address (can't at the moment either unfortunately).
On 2/11/03 15:22, Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I have Exchange 2000 SP3.
One of the customers has Macs and they are
It's not the MS Exchange legacy DN? Call PSS back and tell them to find the
attribute(s) in question, they can and if they won't ask them who they'd
like to escalate the call to. You'll likely be able to set those attributes
programmatically.
On 2/11/03 16:02, Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, currently entourage can using LDAP... But that's another kettle of
fish.
On 2/11/03 16:46, Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks
Last time someone tried to connect to our Exchange servers with a
MAPI-configured Outlook for Macintosh it did not work - that dumb
application
Yes?
On 2/11/03 17:23, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SRS used and/or necessary with ADCs?
tia
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Go to where it was explicitly granted and uncheck it. The information store
object perhaps?
On 2/5/03 23:16, Jojo Solis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one of those group has inherited permission. how can i remove that?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
My point was that this is the straw that breaks the camels back. First my
application written for DOS 3.22 stops working on Windows X, then they
change core OS functionality like the ability to create an Outlook://
shortcut on the desktop. I say it's time to switch to Linux and Samsung
Contact.
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!
My point is that Microsoft is an evil company which makes crap software and
if it wasn't for them I'd be happily flipping burgers at Burger King or
hosting my own 'news show' on Fox.
On 2/6/03 9:48, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I get his point, and you
Keep your router and reinstall the TCP/IP stack. Then if it still doesn't
work, use RPCPing to test.
On 2/6/03 10:16, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The workstation has internet can log into OWA no problem. Used Ip
address resolves to Exchange server name not to mail box name. I can
ping to
one global address list
only. The default address list has been deleted. (not needed)Something
is hosed in this workstations XP pro install I just do not know where.
My laptop running xp pro has no problems as does my home office!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto
Tools | Recover Deleted Items?
On 2/6/03 16:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will either of these utilities work against a public store for a
contact-type folder? I have a 5.5 pub.edb but wondering whether there's
any other way to recover a shared contacts folder from it
Neither of those tools works against an unmounted store of any kind, so a
recovery server would be required. Ontrack's tool might work, btu for this
particular scenario a recovery server is less expensive.
On 2/6/03 17:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do, but in E2K. This is
Move them at 3 AM.
On 2/6/03 17:48, Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSX2000+SP3
1 forest
Do we have any Qarticle explaining how to prevent logon during an exchage
2000 move mailbox process?
I have tried the article below it does work for msx2000
PF's don't accept NDRs. A message being sent somewhere within the system is
being sent to an address which is ambiguous. In the scripts section of
www.swinc.com can help locate whatever object has suplicate SMTP addresses.
On 2/6/03 19:02, Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone
Impugning my personal integrity?[1][2][3]
[1] Ponders recommendation to several people this week of Infonition
software.
[2] Wonders if his statements about the abilities of Herr Deckler to a
customer they met with today should be amended.
[3] Decides to cross him off Christmas card list
Outlook has faxing ability in every mode, given the proper software.
On 2/5/03 9:14, Public Folder: Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 2000, Outlook XP. When I make a contact and I add a
fax number in
the contact (then save) I see that contact twice in my
address list. When
ARE... (!)
none ARE... (!?)
wasn't you taught english proper?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 January, 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Free Mailing List Software
There are some 3rd party mailing list products
Sherpa Software has such a tool among others... www.mail-resources.com lists
at least one other I think.
On 2/5/03 10:56, Marc Mearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
User Group
Can any one please help or tell me of any packages that they know of that
can search the Exchange 2000 database for
is a beautifully fluid and democratic language, I will not clip
my children's ears for such utterances as was my fate.
(I was an English teacher in another life)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February, 2003 17:15
To: Exchange Discussions
The e-mail address field where in the GAL? Step by step it for the guys who
ride the short bus please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bailey, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Huh?
On 2/5/03 13:36, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you control how many and how long URLs stay in the list?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Ah... There's some good kiosk software for that.
On 2/5/03 15:52, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone wanted to limit the URLs to ONLY the OWA URL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday
Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2 applications don't run on Windows XP.
Bastards!
On 2/5/03 15:57, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you put in the , XP wants to add an http://; in front of it.
If you do not put that in, it just creates the shortcut, but then it
throws up an
-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Global Address List problem
The e-mail address field where in the GAL? Step by step it for the guys who
ride the short bus please.
-Original Message
KB 296071 and no it's not that different.
On 2/5/03 16:36, Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is a far cry from something that worked in Windows 2000 and Outlook
2000 to Windows XP and Outlook 2002. We're talking basic URL functionality
here.
Right, I'm still pissed my DOS 3.2
There's no exact way to predict what effect SIS will have on the mailbox
store is a move done using PST files. Using Tools | Move Mailbox SIS is
maintained.
On 2/5/03 17:18, John Strongosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In going over the 20 Tips for Exchange 2000 Migration paper from Kieran
401 - 500 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
