--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi?
Not necessarily a
On Jun 17, 2007, at 2:00 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 2:00 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you aren't familiar with the tradition, it's easier to pull the
wool over your eyes.
And if you base your judgment on whether Maharishi is a yogi based on
your intellectual understanding of some tradition, you can pull the
(snip)
Veda also has a broader definition and that definition is simply
knowledge (it's actually derived from the root vid,
knowledge),
as in direct, samadhic knowledge. In that sense it is eternal and
not
limited to texts bearing the name Veda. Everyone has access to
their own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
Veda also has a broader definition and that definition is
simply
knowledge (it's actually derived from the root vid,
knowledge),
Just a minor correction: Sanskrit roots are verbal roots,
and they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily.
I'd really like to hear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily.
I'd really like to hear the details of that if you care to share it.
If not openly, then an email
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily.
I'd really like to hear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just forwarded 10 posts from this group to Swami G,
I did the best I
could to be sensible in leaving out a few posts,
why ? With all due respect, I strongly suggest she answers directly to
all the questions that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I will forward this suggestion but in all fairness, if you see
what I just said in the previous post, there are already 15 yahoo
groups Swami G is monoriting. It just took me a lot of time in just
this one group to go
Hello,
This is the original post and the forwarded response from Swami G:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System,
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is the original post and
Hello,
Going through the posts is not like normal letter, I am cutting out
the redundency or what I think is either blatently ignorant or
without sincerity or someone playing around.
There was a post like that in the other thread. I did post a response
which covers all the posts. If there are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
LOL!
[snip]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
*lol* I love YOU, Alex; Your
Re: Guru Dev's deathbed instructions to Maharishi . . .
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
Are we about to step into
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
Ron wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
Are we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru.
I have forwarded both the post here and in the other thread to Swami G
and will post a response.
I know there were 4 Gurus along the way in Swami G's path- you can see
some info about Tantra, mantra - how Swami G even defines it in
www.abide-in-self.com
Tanmay
People here tend to judge
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a
guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it!
Could we happily devolve this
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Namaste GuruJi,
Namaste
My Tantric Master was not from Rishiskesh but another part of india -
what was learned
wasn't what the west terms a left hand path - it was this Sat Guru
that also commissioned
me to go forward as a
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
#5
Namaste
mantra diksha is a far cry from becoming a sannyasi -
Yes a transmission occurs around an authorised Guru - and it
is known here having spoken with one of Mahesh Yogis Sadhakas
who WAS in direct proximity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your guru comes off to me like any other common person who has their
own opinions. Maharishi, whether he has certain initiations or
not, has a much
greater energy presence than your guru.
Agreed- felt, or didn't feel,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a
guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be
I looked at the picture, and it certainly is Swami G with, as you
righly say a pujari. Please go also to
http://youtube.com/results?search_query=Swami+Gsearch=Search and you
can see that it Swami G is an American woman who has taken sannyas
vows. About the stick I am also puzzled, by I
Thanks again for the quick response. My comments follow:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
G Now if you want to go on what is being promoted about Guru Dev
saying that only Brahmins may be sannyas then STILL Mahesh Yogi
can have no claim to being a
Come find the Beauty life has to Offer
Be a Great Existence -
Om Namo Narayana
G my training is within both Shivaite and Kali traditions as well as
esoteric christianity - as stated before i am Fully authorised by my
Tantric Guru as a Sat Guru which is beyond the state of an achraya
to
I would have expected Ron's 'swami' guru to rise above the polarity
with something meaningful to at least present some dignity. Guru Dev
[SBS] seems to have united people and done this without any apparent
effort. Instead, Ron's guru appears to be part of the conflict.
Hello,
Lets try
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in this thread?
I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following emails from 15 yahoo groups, so I am only reading the
mails in this thread and really busy. Swami G is not in FFL at all.
Tanmay
Tanmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily.
I'd really like to hear the details of that if you care to share it.
If not openly, then an email would work.:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have expected Ron's 'swami' guru to rise above the polarity
with something meaningful to at least present some dignity. Guru Dev
[SBS] seems to have united people and done this without any apparent
effort.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@
wrote:
(snip)
The dynamite never bothered me at all, and many
others. Really. It bothered a few people, and I
guess they're the ones who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But he
didn't do it because GD was his master, and he was completely
dedicated to him, served him for 13 years etc. So you think GD just
dumped him, saying: you are not a Brahmin, you are only a Brahmachari?
I find
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in
this thread? I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following emails from 15 yahoo groups, so I am only
reading the mails in this thread
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
I experience the presence of Guru Dev almost daily.
I'd really like to hear the details of that if you care to share it.
If not openly, then an email
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives boo_lives@ wrote:
But he
didn't do it because GD was his master, and he was completely
dedicated to him, served him for 13 years etc. So you think GD just
dumped
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in this thread?
I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following emails from 15 yahoo groups, so I am only reading the
mails in this thread and
Thanks for the correction but I could swear she said in one of the
videos she at least met her master near Rishikesh. I also got the
impression from the video that she didn't spend that much time with him
(and he has passed on). It took me 5 years to get commissioned to
Swami and I can only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize trin. for going off on the word. I agree completely with
most of what you say, and I personally don't care much for the
conservative formalisms of hinduism or any other religion. In general
I feel devotion
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Hello t3rinity,
Can you post that Judy post you are talking about here in
this thread? I think this is called a thread - right?
I am following
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
inquire into and integrate
Christ, this whole dialog is a breath of fresh air. Ron, (Tanmay) you
were born for this moment.
lurk
Hello,
Nice to see a nice comment. I have a lot of enthusiasm for what is
taking place. It is my seva, and it is a part of the whole process
that one that is in a path is doing seva, to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
I can't deny my own experience.
I am a TM teacher who has directly experienced Guru Dev during TM
initiations and otherwise. I know of at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Ron wrote:
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
* I doubt it. I've come across Swami G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those two things ( for me) are of the utmost importance in order for
significant progress- and emphasized- Sat Guru and one to one. For
those who have come across this, we can say that the universe has
offered a choice. Swami G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj?
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
On Jun 11, 2007, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Those two things ( for me) are of the utmost importance in order for
significant progress- and emphasized- Sat Guru and one to one. For
those who
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj?
The ones exposed here (sorry, accidentally
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
Hello,
Well, As was suggested by Swami G , one honors where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
there is no way a full initiate would be wearing white - and while
he may claim Guru Dev as his Guru, like stated before there is
no way a Full initiate and most certainly a Shakaracharya that
holds the rules of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
Just one minute, Vaj my man, but if *lies* are unraveling, wouldn't
that result in them revealing their truth? And what is wrong with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
there is no way a full initiate would be wearing white - and
while
he may claim Guru Dev as his Guru, like stated before there is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of
Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as
we
inquire into and integrate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I can offer a little food for thought here. There are no rules
that say one that is enlightened must keep it secret. I have been
saying things are direct and to the point here in my path. So, for a
starter, one can ask
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System, only Brahmins can
On Jun 12, 2007, at 10:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being in that living tradition
Au contraire, she claimed
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:34 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being in that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unlike Balsekar i am not going to say all is perfect as it is
- and if you are a murderer then that is quite fine it is perfect
and just be what you are.
Personally, I find Balsekar's perspective refreshing. While I haven't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System, only
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
So you think GD just
dumped him, saying: you are not a Brahmin, you are only a Brahmachari?
No, he dumped him, saying: Hit the road, Jack.
I find this logic ridiculous and even arrogant.
Me too. I mean, GD really could have gone to the trouble
On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and
Just want to echo Nablusoss' appreciation of all the information you
posted and ask a related question: the Saraswati order is one of 3
that you said are only for Brahmins; what are the other 2? Also,
I've understood that at least some of the Dashanami orders are
entirely defunct, such as
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi? Certainly, Guru Dev was spoken of as a Siddha
Yogi although no account I've read says anything about whether he did
or did not do Hatha Yoga.
And
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi?
Not necessarily a hatha yogi, but a practitioner of yoga-darshana
(which includes
Hello, I forwarded this to Swami G, there have been really a lot of
eamils today.
Anyway, what is a Braman? Swami G has pointed out in the past what a
Braman really is, as opposed to how it is practiced today- something
like what american gem society did to clasify birthstones in order to
sell
Even a worse situation- I only read one paragraph before I responded,
then noticed a long response to the post, so I reforwarded the entire
commentary and will post any replies from Swami G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even a worse situation- I only read one paragraph before I
responded, then noticed a long response to the post, so I
reforwarded the entire commentary and will post any replies
from Swami G
Her driving mind drove her to
Hello,
I just forwarded 10 posts from this group to Swami G, I did the best I
could to be sensible in leaving out a few posts, also from the new
thread with Swami G in the title.
There are two yahoo groups ( out of around 15) that Swami G monitors
and responds to posts. Some of you may consider
Hello, I will forward this suggestion but in all fairness, if you see
what I just said in the previous post, there are already 15 yahoo
groups Swami G is monoriting. It just took me a lot of time in just
this one group to go through the posts and weed out some unnecccessay
things
In addition to
Hello again,
I just remembered that one of Swami G's books should be in 21st century book
store, or also
at amazon- Kundalini from hell to heaven by Ganga Karmokar
I think I have that right
Tanmay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello group,
Since being in touch with Rick lately, I followed 2 threads- is that
what you call them? I read all the comments about Guru Dev's
deathbed
instructions, and also comments about Maharishi's latest comments
Your guru ends the message of trying to draw Maharishi down into the
mud with:
I WELCOME YOU ALL WITH GREAT LOVE AND RESPECT.
What a joke...
I forwarded this comment to Swami G and this is the reply:
G when it comes to the antics of Mahesh Yogi, this Guru is not laughing -
when so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
In the case of this situation with Maharishi, and the deathbed
instructions, I am simply no longer used to speculating about what
happened because in my camp here, I pick up the phone, or send an
email and the
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your guru ends the message of trying to draw Maharishi down into
the
mud with:
I WELCOME YOU ALL WITH GREAT LOVE AND RESPECT.
What a joke...
I forwarded this
Ron, please forward this to Swami G.
I my judgment of MMY was solely based on his
behavior I too would doubt the legitimacy of him and
his teachings. I agree with you, and there are many
others also in the TMO that see his behavior as
strange, to say the least. But while I have this
surface
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm not a great fan of Maharishi it is my understanding that TM
was not taught by Guru Dev but that it was given to Maharishi by him.
Even MMY does not actually say this literally. MMY speaks of guru dev
as the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went to that site and checked it out. I also have read what you
posted
from your Guru about Maharishi.
While I'm not a great fan of Maharishi it is my understanding that
TM
was not taught by Guru Dev but that it was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
[snip]
My meditater wife has also seen Guru Dev's expression change in a
photo we have of him, AND spoken [telepathically] with him - and she's
only
(snip)
I'd class it at the same level of veracity as the guys
on my TTC who said, when we complained about the dyna-
miting next door to our hotels, Maharishi has *definitely*
been told about the dynamite, and he told me to tell you
that you shouldn't mind it. He's working on resolving the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(snip)
I'd class it at the same level of veracity as the guys
on my TTC who said, when we complained about the dyna-
miting next door to our hotels, Maharishi has *definitely*
been told about the dynamite, and
(snip)
The dynamite never bothered me at all, and many
others. Really. It bothered a few people, and I
guess they're the ones who had talked to the course
leaders about it and been given a Go away, every-
thing is being taken care of story.
But, don't you see the metaphor of this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming from my Guru, it was said there is a tradition where a Guru was
appointed Guru by their Guru. Furthermore, Maharishi did not take full
Sanyas vows, or full vows within the tradition of GuruDev. Maybe he
was a secretary?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(snip)
The dynamite never bothered me at all, and many
others. Really. It bothered a few people, and I
guess they're the ones who had talked to the course
leaders about it and been given a Go away, every-
Hello,
I am forwarding a reply from Swami G to some of the comments:
G i don't know enough about Byron Katie to comment - so will stay
silent on this.
As far as the other comments are concerned - if they have gotten
something from
TM GREAT, if they remain in balance and not in confusion
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
I doubt it. I've come across Swami G several times in the past few
years, and it's always been in a context of conflict. She has a very
dualistic and fundamentalist
Note: I am forwarding a response from Swami G to the last post. There
is a mixture of comments from me and also the poster. Me = T ( short
for Tanmay which is my spirital name given at diksha), *= the poster,
and G = Swami G:
T: Coming from my Guru, it was said there is a tradition where a Guru
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
* I doubt it. I've come across Swami G several times in the past few
years, and it's always been in a context of conflict. She has a very
dualistic and fundamentalist mindset about spiritual rights and wrongs
G dualistic and fundamentalist ?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
inquire into and integrate our self-righteously scripted reactions
around warmongers, liars, false
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, we've often found Byron Katie (Loving what IS) to be very
useful in helping the divisive mind to catch up with Us :-)
http://www.thework.com/index.asp
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
