Hi All,
While creating the new branch for (what I’ll be calling from now on)
Changing IPD Hack, I noticed the many branches that already exist and
that reminded me of an old conversation we had about that:
http://markmail.org/thread/mpcse3cgvdlgfi5u
If that’s ok for everyone I’ll move the followi
Done.
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> While creating the new branch for (what I’ll be calling from now on)
> Changing IPD Hack, I noticed the many branches that already exist and
> that reminded me of an old conversation we had about that:
> http://markmail.org/threa
Hi,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2009, at 20:26, Simon Pepping wrote:
>
> Hi Simon, Vincent,
>
>>
>> I get the feeling that this means that you are planning to relaunch
>> line breaking while in the page breaking phase.
Yes.
>> Is that possible?
That’s what I am currently trying to f
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> Shouldn't you be doing this in trunk? Simon
I guess I could, but I’m doing the changes as I go along the code to
figure out what I have to do where. Switching back and forth from a copy
of the Trunk to a copy of the branch would be tedious.
Even if the branch doe
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2009, at 17:50, vhennebert apache org wrote:
>
>> Author: vhennebert
>> Date: Tue Jun 23 15:50:15 2009
>> New Revision: 787733
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787733&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Code clean-up
>>
>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
Hi Andreas,
The changes generally look good. I just have two small questions:
> Author: adelmelle
> Date: Wed Jul 1 13:52:20 2009
> New Revision: 790166
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790166&view=rev
> Log:
> Further cleanup/readability improvements
>
> @@ -550,31 +563,33 @@
>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 07 Jul 2009, at 13:54, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>>> splitLength += element.getW();
>>> } else {
>>> // element is a
Hi Andreas,
Again, most of the clean up looks good, only...
> Author: adelmelle
> Date: Sat Jul 4 17:00:05 2009
> New Revision: 791153
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=791153&view=rev
> Log:
> Further cleanup/readability improvements
>
> Modified:
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> On 07 Jul 2009, at 17:55, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent
>
>>> .. Another leak from the keep-within-column patch?
>
> Indeed, but this one I caught soon after committing, so is already undone.
Of course. Stupid me :-|
Thanks
Hi,
> Author: vhennebert
> Date: Wed Jul 22 17:51:02 2009
> New Revision: 796812
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796812&view=rev
> Log:
> Blocked revision 796809 from Trunk (corresponds to changes made in this
> branch and merged back to the Trunk)
A word of explanation about this com
Hi All,
I’m basically finished with the implementation of the hack to handle
pages of different widths. As a remainder, tables and lists aren’t
supported; this means that they will flow on the new page without taking
the new width into account. So if there is a switch between e.g.
a landscape page
[Sent on behalf of the Travel Assistance Committee.]
Original Message
The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those wanting
to attend ApacheCon US 2009 (Oakland) which takes place between the 2nd and
6th November 2009.
The Travel Assistance Committee is loo
Hi Simon,
Thank you for giving a go at testing the branch. I could reproduce the
hyphenation and flow_changing-ipd_4.xml problems. Regarding the stretch
issue, could you send me a sample FO file? I suspect that this may be
normal in the sense that the layout policy is slightly different when
there
Hi,
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thank you for giving a go at testing the branch. I could reproduce the
> hyphenation and flow_changing-ipd_4.xml problems. Regarding the stretch
> issue, could you send me a sample FO file? I suspect that this may be
> normal in
Hi Simon,
The report looks good. Just a thing about the ChangingIPD hack: actually
it is still undecided whether it should be merged back to Trunk or not.
My main concern about that is that it will get in the way when
implementing the new approach. I will basically have to start with
reverting al
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:37:13AM -, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + No releases this quarter. A provisional solution for changing IPD (page
>> width) has been developed in a branch. This solution works only for simple
>> cases and is more a hack than
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe its time we moved to 1.5 like the rest of the world. Max, Vincent
> and Andreas, myself and others were all in favour of the switch in June
> 2008 (see http://www.nabble.com/Switching-to-Java-1.5-td17673100.html).
> Sun's end of life transition period f
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:44:03AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>> Uhm, Simon, this change uses tons of Java 1.5 features. The build fails
>> now on Java 1.4. OK if we revert until you've had a chance to revisit?
>
> I am surprised. My eclipse project is set to 1
Hi All,
Having had no feedback from the users list, I’m happy to announce that
the ChangingIPDHack branch is now totally bug-free :-)
Following the discussion on general@ [1], the best way to handle this
probably is to merge the changes back into the Trunk, even if they are
hacky. Maintaining a s
Hi Clay,
The Web Maestro wrote:
> I agree about consistency w requirements... Perhaps one additional
> release req 1.4, then move to 1.5 for the next release. I don't have
> any real energy about whether the 1.0 should be 1.4 or 1.5, however...
> I do agree that there should be a significant versi
Time for the results: 7 +1, no negative vote. The vote passes.
I’ll proceed with the merge in the next days.
Thanks,
Vincent
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Having had no feedback from the users list, I’m happy to announce that
> the ChangingIPDHack branch is now tota
> Author: vhennebert
> Date: Wed Aug 26 17:42:11 2009
> New Revision: 808135
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=808135&view=rev
> Log:
> Reverted changes made in revision 796809 (manual merge of clean-up changes
> made in the ChangingIPDHack branch). Those changes will be re-applied when
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Thesing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a short status / question update.
>
>
> What remains is layout and producing the change bar areas.
>
> If I read the spec right, the intended semantics of the change-bar-elements
> is the following:
> - for all elements generating areas t
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Thesing wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>> My idea is now along the following lines:
>>> - Remember for each element during parsing the change bars it is
>> influenced by.
>>> - After layout, go over all areas produced by those influenced elements
>>> and add the areas for the chang
Hi,
does anyone know why the o.a.f.apps.Fop.getDefaultHandler method returns
an instance of org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler and not just an
org.xml.sax.ContentHandler? Could that be changed?
Thanks,
Vincent
Hi,
It may also be interesting to have a look at ICU4J [1]. I think this
dependency will be necessary anyway if we are serious about implementing
complex scripts. There may be stuff there that would avoid us
re-inventing the wheel.
[1] http://site.icu-project.org/
Vincent
spepping leverkruid e
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>
>
> As I read the grammar for the font shorthand it is ambiguous, though not
> fatally so as long as one excludes the value of "inherit" from
> individual properties in the font short hand.
>
>
>
> For instance the first optional arg
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> thanks for pointing me to fontbox. As I did not find a repository with a
> trunk, I had a look into fontbox-0.8.0-incubating. They have quite clean
> code to parse TrueType files. But they are also not able to read any
> OpenType data. They are ev
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> You make excellent points, however for font-style, font-variant and
> font-weight the initial value (the default value) is normal, not inherit.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice7.html#font-style
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR
Hi Tony,
Tony Graham wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21 2009 23:30:17 +0100, jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com wrote:
> ...
>> If inherit is allowed to be a value then the grammar truly becomes ambiguous
>> since each of these can have the value inherit and we don?t know which ones
>> are
>> omitted and mu
To those PDF specialists around here: am I right that the structure tree
could as well be converted into PDF at the end of a page sequence, as at
the beginning?
In other words: could the piece of code dealing with the structure tree
be moved from PDFDocumentHandler.startPageSequence to
PDFDocument
not
yet built, then build structure tree”?
> On 23.09.2009 13:44:11 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> To those PDF specialists around here: am I right that the structure tree
>> could as well be converted into PDF at the end of a page sequence, as at
>> the beginning?
>>
>>
Hi Alexander,
Knowing just about nothing of font file formats and libraries, I’ll play
the ignorant guy asking naive questions, hoping that it might give you
good ideas.
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 08:37 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>> I don't think that rely
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>>> I had a look at SeekableStream and I can imagine how the needs resulted
>>> in the ImageInputStream interface. I haven't decided yet if I should use
>>> ImageInputStream directly. Maybe someone else can throw it's two cents
>>> in here.
>> H
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> thanks for that. I just changed the Idea output dirs to match that from
> Ant and now almost all tests run.
The test/layoutengine/disabled-testcases.xml file lists tests that don’t
currently pass. You have to set the fop.layoutengine.disable
Hi,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 27.09.2009 13:27:35 Alexander Kiel wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>>> Makes sense. I stumbled over that myself from time to time but it didn't
>>> really bother me so much to take action.
>> Okay. Can you please modify the checkstyle XML files to reflect that?
>
> Sure,
Hi Guys,
Maybe a bit late, but you may find the following page interesting:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FOPIntelliJSetup
Feel free to make any additions or corrections to this document.
As to the use of checkstyle: I think the rules were set up long after
the project was created. So th
Hi Carlos,
Carlos Villegas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I searched the mailing lists and it seems that although some people had
> worked at several times at trying to implement retrieve-table-marker,
> it's not yet done. Is somebody working on this? What's the status?
It’s not being worked on at the moment.
Hi Jonathan,
Interesting stuff!
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>
> Because font-variant font-style and font-weight can occur in any order,
> I could not (currently) come up with a grammar in which the directing
> sets were disjoint for each non-terminal. So I was unable to come up
>
nd then call startPageSequence when the first page tag
> is encountered.
That’s what I ended up doing.
Thanks for your input,
Vincent
> On 24.09.2009 13:07:11 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Not just like that (if at all). The content items being produced inside
I didn’t think of it. If
a choice had to be made between ANTLR and JavaCC, which one would win?
> JavaCC is BSD license, so we could easily integrate it in the fop build.
>
> Max
Thanks,
Vincent
> 2009/9/28 Vincent Hennebert:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Interesting s
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
Here are my two cents: if you make use of classes in javax.imagio at
only one place in your font library, then there’s no need to worry about
creating a more neutral layer. If OTOH you need to use those classes
everywhere, th
Hi Max,
Max Berger wrote:
> Alex,
>
> The checkstyle checks are historically grown, and are therefore
> incomplete. I personally would turn on much more checks for certain
> style issues I like. IMO every option set helps deciding a certain
> factor. So more the more checks the better :)
If you
Hi,
The StructTreeRoot dictionary must have a ParentTree entry whose type is
a number tree. As explained in Section 3.8.5, “Number Trees” of the PDF
Reference, Third Edition, the Nums entry of a number tree node must be
an array of key-value pairs where value is an indirect reference to the
object
Hi Max,
Max Berger wrote:
> Vincent,
>
>
> 2009/9/29 Vincent Hennebert:
>> I started to write my own checkstyle configuration from scratch some
>> time ago, enabling everything that looked important to me. But I’d like
>> to test it a bit more before submitti
ardi 29 septembre 2009 13:00
> À : fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Questionable whether font-shorthand grammar LL(1)
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
>
> 2009/9/29 Vincent Hennebert :
>>> How about specifing the grammer and using a tool such as JavaCC to
>>> gene
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Excellent ideas!
>
> The diagram you drew is extremely useful!
>
> If the font shorthand sub-language has a grammar that is regular then it also
> has a grammar that is LL(1). So recursive descent parsing will work, if
> there is a re
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> I see. I had in mind to use OpenTypeDataInputStream as the common
>> interface. It actually makes sense to use ImageInputStream instead.
>> Simpler and just as flexible. That will add a direct dependency on
>> a class in the javax.imageio pac
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> First, I will respect every code style of FOP. Its just a matter of
> discussion.
>
>>> Really? That means commenting every public method even simple Getters
>>> and Setters?
>> Yes. Simple Getter and Setters are the only place where you can
>> p
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> Should the rule be disabled because of that? Having proper javadoc on at
>> least public methods is very important. OTOH, this is actually not
>> something Checkstyle can verify. How many methods in the code base have
>> totally useless comme
Hi Max,
Thanks for your explanation.
Max Berger wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> this rule is usefull in the case where you use common names for
> attributes (such as x, or y), and accidentially "overwrite" them as
> parameters. This again comes back to the point of readability.
>
> The same variable name sh
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do we use , or {...@code}? I found all three version. Is there a
> Checkstyle for that?
Use {...@code}. HTML tags should be avoided as much as possible.
> Do we introduce a newline between the Javadoc body and the @param,
> @return or @throws clau
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 01.10.2009 15:08:55 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> Alexander Kiel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> do we use , or {...@code}? I found all three version. Is there a
>>> Checkstyle for that?
Hi,
Am I right in thinking that images are always rendered into PDF as Image
XObjects, and never as inline images (section 4.8.6 of the PDF
Reference, Third Edition)?
Thanks,
Vincent
Hi Alexander,
I can’t really help I’m afraid, as I personally don’t have the necessary
knowledge. It’s probably time to submit what you already have as a patch
attached to a Bugzilla entry:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fop
That will allow us to have a look and maybe pro
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> I noticed that if one is not careful in one's regular expression use,
> the compilation for a regular expression can take minutes. I'm not
> talking about applying the pattern just compiling it!
>
>
>
> Should regular expressions be avoided altogether a
Hi,
If I render the attached FO file into IF XML with the attached
configuration file, then render the xml file into PDF, then I get the
following error:
SEVERE: Exception
java.lang.NullPointerException: fontName must not be null
at org.apache.fop.cli.InputHandler.transformTo(InputHandler.
While I'm at it, and taking the same FO file and config file: specifying
a mime type for the intermediate format doesn’t seem to work, contrary
to the area tree. Take the config file, remove the part corresponding to
the intermediate format (
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
>> To reproduce: put the config file at the root of a FOP local copy, then
>> run the following:
>> fop -c config.xconf test.fo -if if.xml
>> fop -c config.xconf -ifin if.xml test.pdf
>
> I would like to run your example this way, but t
hich ones allow to use the lexer independently of the parser. Unless we
decide to use both the lexer and parser anyway...
Vincent
> Best Regards,
> Jonathan S. Levinson
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com]
> Sent:
Hi,
I tried every image format I could think of, none triggers the use of
PDFImageHandlerGraphics2D. AFAIU this is the only image handler that
doesn’t call PDFRenderer.placeImage or renderDocument in return, in
which accessibility is handled. So if that handler is used the generated
PDF will be in
ose can convert Barcode XML to Graphics2D which should be picked over
>> the Barcode XML -> SVG implementation in the PDF case. But that will
>> only be triggered with the new IF. With the renderer, I assume (without
>> checking) the XMLHandler interface will be used.
>>
Hi,
Just a nit:
> +private boolean useCatalogResolver = false;
> +private EntityResolver entityResolver = null;
> +private URIResolver uriResolver = null;
Those fields are being initialized to their default values. The Java
Language Specification states [1] that every field must be i
Hi,
In doubt, I added them, but is it actually necessary to put license
headers in such test files? The header is bigger than the actual
content...
Vincent
> Added:
> xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/test/accessibility/background-image_jpg_repeat.fo
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/v
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:04:09AM -, vhenneb...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: vhennebert
>> Date: Tue Oct 20 10:04:09 2009
>> New Revision: 827023
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=827023&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fixed checkstyle issues.
>> Factorized dupl
Hi,
> Log:
> Issue an error when attempting to render an intermediate XML file in
> accessibility mode, but that file wasn't generated with accessibility (i.e.,
> does not contain the structure tree)
>
> Added:
>
> xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_Accessibility/src/java/org/apache/fop/accessi
Hi,
Just a few precisions:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 22.10.2009 21:15:40 Simon Pepping wrote:
>> Can you summarize what the branch tries to achieve?
>
> I'll try. In short: it provides the Tagged PDF feature that some people
> have always wanted.
>
> Long story: Without the accessibility/doc
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> There's another side-effect to tagged PDF: It allows for better text
>> extraction from the document. PDF even describes ways to make
>> round-trips from XML -> PDF -> XML -> PDF if certain conditions were met.
>>
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Kiel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can we update QDox from 1.6.3 to 1.10?
>
> I have an issue with QDox 1.6.3: It can't parse my Fixed16 class (which
> I have attached to this mail). The problem is in line 35:
>
> private static final float DENOMINATOR = (float) (1 << 14);
>
> It c
Hi Alexander,
That piece of code didn’t make sense, in addition to being wrong. It’s
up to the user to add stretching to the footnote separator if they ever
want to. Actually that code could even have led to unexpected results in
some cases.
Since it wasn’t breaking any layout test case, I remove
Hi Domján,
Domján Gergő wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thank You for Your answer.
> I would like to make clear, that it was not me, who added this "pageSize"
> element arbitrarily to the config file, it was in the sample config xml I
> downloaded with the FOP package 0.95 from the Apache FOP website.
>
Hi,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 22.10.2009 19:36:14 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Log:
>>> Issue an error when attempting to render an intermediate XML file in
>>> accessibility mode, but that file wasn't generated with accessibility
Hi,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback is from the
> design phase and lists the reasons:
> - type safety
> - check mechanism to detect missing translations
> - check mechanism to make sure all necessary parameters are really dealt
> with, especially
Time to sum up. So we have 6 +1, no other vote. The vote passes.
I’ll proceed with the merge shortly. If you could refrain from
committing anything to the Trunk until then, I would be grateful.
Thanks,
Vincent
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Work on PDF accessibility is basic
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Wed Oct 28 09:09:55 2009
> New Revision: 830476
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=830476&view=rev
> Log:
> Added missing EventModelFactory to avoid error:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Event model doesn't contain the definition
> for org.apache.fop.access
rove it as I see fit.
Sorry for the rant, but I had to get that off my chest.
Vincent
> On 28.10.2009 12:09:24 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>> Author: jeremias
>>> Date: Wed Oct 28 09:09:55 2009
>>> New Revision: 830476
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache
Hi,
Looks like Max is busy with more urgent things :-)
As this patch will affect my future work on the layout engine, I’d like
to take over the patch review.
Your suggestion to use Skype sounds good. That will ease the job a bit.
I’ll contact you off-line to exchange details and arrange a time.
Hi,
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I took a stab at applying a patch by Richard Wheeldon some time ago now
> but the solution was not complete (see
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42307).
>
> Without spending too much time looking into this, I am of the impression
Hi,
Some time ago basic PDF accessibility was implemented in FOP [1]. Part
of the job is to store the document’s logical structure into the PDF
output [2]. Basically, store the information “This content was in
a block”, “that content comes from a table-cell”, etc.
PDF defines a set of standard st
Hi Stephan,
I’m not sure I would invest any energy into improving the
CachedRenderPagesModel (-conserve option). It doesn’t look like the
right approach to me, and like you noticed it doesn’t even work out of
the box currently.
Why store the Area Tree on disk? Why not directly render it into the
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 05:17:03PM -, vhenneb...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: vhennebert
>> Date: Wed Jan 13 17:17:01 2010
>> New Revision: 898845
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=898845&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Updated reference accessible PDF files. Old
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> From a FontBox report: We are still working on integrating Villu's
> patch which adds support for Adobe CFF/Type2 fonts to FontBox.
>
> This raises my question: Can we share font handling code with FontBox?
A priori yes. Our own font code definitely needs improve
Hi,
FYI, I’ve just committed a fix for this bug:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=904467&view=rev
If you ever need to you can apply the patch to FOP 0.95’s source code as
is.
As a side note, introducing a new object just for synchronization
purpose is not necessary. The class object (PDFICCBased
Hi Martin,
Martin Edge wrote:
> Within eclipse it says it's within the 'build path' or do you mean within
> Java's class path?
You need to refresh the directory for Eclipse to take into account new
files created by the build process.
Select the project in the Package Explorer view and press ‘F5
Hi Jeremias,
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Wed Feb 10 15:37:04 2010
> New Revision: 908543
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908543&view=rev
> Log:
> Bugzilla #48512:
> Bugfix: Don't map AdobeStandardEncoding to StandardEncoding. They are not the
> same. Fixes problem with invalid character
Hi Pascal,
> Author: psancho
> Date: Mon Feb 15 15:43:32 2010
> New Revision: 910239
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910239&view=rev
> Log:
> Added complete list of 1.1 item in compliance page.
> - Udated information for page-number-citation-last, content-width,
> content-height, and
or more
information:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/doc.html#web
Feel free to ask here if you have any question.
Thanks,
Vincent
> Pascal
>
> Vincent Hennebert a écrit :
>> Hi Pascal,
>>
>>
>>> Author: psancho
>>> Date: Mon Feb 15 15:43:32 2010
>>> New
Pascal Sancho wrote:
> You are right, Simon.
> I've tried to commit deployment by hands, and it's OK.
> I have to investigate why ForrestBot did not.
FWIW, ForrestBot has never worked for me. From the quick investigation
I made (it was a long time ago), the parsing of the ‘svn st’ it was
doing to
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> [previously sent in fop-user mailing list]
>
> hi there,
>
> This is my first post to fop-dev, it is suggested to report bug here.
Actually bug reports should be made on Bugzilla:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fop
Please could y
Hi,
Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I partially agree, but...:
> - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006);
> - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
>
> I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO.
> WDYT
Simon Pepping wrote:
> Ross Gardler of ASF announced that it is time for our projects to
> start preparing for Google Summer of Code (GSoC). Do we have ideas for
> GSoC projects? Are committers willing to be a mentor?
If any student comes up with a good idea of project in the FOP area, I’d
be happ
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
> Thanks to Adrian and Vincent who want to be mentor. We also need some
> ideas for projects.
>
> 1. Our releases require too much work, which has resulted in no
> release for much too long a time. How can the work related to a
> release be minimized? Can we develop
Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:37:12PM +0000, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>
>> Speaking of the release, many parts of the website are largely outdated
>> and need a serious re-work (the Development tab, mainly). Also, any
>> reference to 0.20.5 shou
Hi,
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> HI Simon,
>
> I'm not sure it would, a very complex subject that would require a lot of
> time just to understand all the considerations involved. There is a good
> reason why it has not been implemented up to now.
Agreed. The table code is too complicated and would
Hi,
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Thu May 20 09:52:27 2010
> New Revision: 946585
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946585&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed many variables and parameters from "int" to "char" because AFP font
> support mostly uses Unicode code points unlike Type 1 and TrueType suppo
sed as some of the
> data structures in there will get insanely large if we start supporting
> characters beyong the basic plane. So unless there is a sustained veto
> against rev 946585 I'm inclined to leave it like it is.
>
> On 21.05.2010 11:46:42 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
&
Hi,
Following Jeremias’ notes about implementing support for TrueType fonts
in PostScript:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/TrueTypeInPostScript
I’d like to give it a go. I will create a branch shortly and work from
there. Any help or comments would be most welcome, as I’m mostly
inexperienc
Hi,
The PostScript Document Structuring Conventions Specification states
that the %%DocumentNeededResources: comment can be specified in the
%%Trailer section, but if this is the case it must also be present in
the header with an (atend) value.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/postscript/pdfs/5001.DSC_
y consumer can deal
> with it. We've never had any complaints about DSC comments that caused
> trouble AFAICR.
I guess using a document manager goes in pair with optimizing the
PostScript output anyway.
Thanks,
Vincent
> On 25.06.2010 13:07:51 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> H
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> hmmyes, that's tricky. An (atend) requires a corresponding comment in
>> the end, but is defined to provide at least one item. An
>> ugly work-around would be to
501 - 600 of 949 matches
Mail list logo
