Re: flashplugin

2009-11-18 Thread Steve Polyack
David Collins wrote: I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles. I tried the following: This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-18 Thread David Collins
This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility # pkg_info -orx linux linux-stuff # pkg_delete -rx linux # cd /compat/linux # find . -type f -ls # rm -rf * # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-17 Thread David Collins
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles. I tried the following: This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility

Re: flashplugin

2009-11-17 Thread David Jackson
I never had tried to install Linux flash. I did install Windows flash under Firefox on Wine and it worked. I found that the freebsd port for Wine would not work but if I downloaded the source from WineHQ and compiled it would work fine, however, i tried a more recent version of Wine which did

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-29 Thread Wayne Sierke
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 03:32 +, RW wrote: On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 + Freminlins freminl...@gmail.com wrote: I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the misery of installing heaps

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so cannot be started because a shared file freetype.so.6 cannot be found... It's there allright and is

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so cannot be started because a shared file freetype.so.6 cannot be found... It's there

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:43:11 -0500 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: I wish someone could explain to me why I am no longer able to install flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I have literally tried them all.. the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC af...@btinternet.com wrote: You seem to want everything to just work without having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you? [...] But my guess is that you really would be happier and more productive with a Windows OS. That

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: In Windows, things don't work without thinking. The misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that other people have to deal with problems, while the user praises Windows for its easyness of use. In PJ's case, maybe

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Polytropon wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC af...@btinternet.com wrote: You seem to want everything to just work without having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you? [...] But my guess is that you really would be happier and more productive

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Tony McC wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: In Windows, things don't work without thinking. The misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that other people have to deal with problems, while the user praises Windows for its easyness of use.

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400 PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: But to study the manual is beyond the capabilities of anyone ... sure, you can read it and study it... but you will forget anything you have read almost immediately if you are not applying what you are studying at once...

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Tony McC
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 + Tony McC af...@btinternet.com wrote: Hi PJ, ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of what I was

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Tony McC wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 + Tony McC af...@btinternet.com wrote: Hi PJ, ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the part I have quoted shows such a deep

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: And I do wish I could use only FreeBSD... the problem is that there are some limitations on compatibility with the normal user's MS systems... You're mixing up things here. Things in MICROS~1 land are not compatible to the

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Polytropon wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: And I do wish I could use only FreeBSD... the problem is that there are some limitations on compatibility with the normal user's MS systems... You're mixing up things here. Things in MICROS~1

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:24 -0400, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: Yeah, but stupid errors are not. Nobody can make all the errors. anyway I goofed somewhere. but what is strange is that the only obvious problem I have is this flashplugin - no matter what I do, I cannot get it to work.

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 Polytropon Polytropon free...@edvax.de replied: [snip] That's not FreeBSD's fault. If professional web designers need to optimize their content in order to prevent you from properly accessing it, it's their fault. I would complain to them, or just ignore them.

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 Polytropon Polytropon free...@edvax.de replied: [snip] That's not FreeBSD's fault. If professional web designers need to optimize their content in order to prevent you from properly

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 You don't really believe that do you. Web creators attempt to make their sites accessible to the largest possible audience. It is probably cost prohibited, if even reasonably possible to make a

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread PJ
Polytropon wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100 Polytropon Polytropon free...@edvax.de replied: [snip] That's not FreeBSD's fault. If professional web designers need to optimize their content in order to

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-28 Thread RW
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 + Freminlins freminl...@gmail.com wrote: I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the misery of installing heaps of crud just to get a flipping browser plugin

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:06:30 -0400 PJ PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca replied: Thank you very much Herbert, I appreciate your input. As I wrote in my original query, I had auccessfully installed the lilnux-flashplugin9 on FreeBSD 7.2 both on a 64 bit portable _ Acer Travelmate 4400 - and on a couple

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 04:13:52 -0500 Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote: That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter, to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially since I

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter, to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a Microsoft product. Strange..

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread PJ
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter, to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE should work too.. supose you use AMD64 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/linux from the system, deinstall all pkg

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-27 Thread PJ
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE should work too.. supose you use AMD64 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/linux

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread Freminlins
2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk % pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32 Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32: Depends on: Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2 Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
Thank you very much Herbert, I appreciate your input. As I wrote in my original query, I had auccessfully installed the lilnux-flashplugin9 on FreeBSD 7.2 both on a 64 bit portable _ Acer Travelmate 4400 - and on a couple of disks on the same machine (i386). I followed the instructions from

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
Matthew Seaman wrote: PJ wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-26 Thread PJ
Freminlins wrote: 2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk % pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32 Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32: Depends on: Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2 Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g Dependency:

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-25 Thread herbert langhans
I have some instructions on http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html - not updated for a while, but it might be some useful input. Cheers herb langhans On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:56:58PM -0400, PJ wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
PJ wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility issues between new

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread Glen Barber
Howdy, On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works. Any errors? I thought I

Re: flashplugin

2009-10-24 Thread PJ
Glen Barber wrote: Howdy, On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote: Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin. I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-04 Thread Edwin L. Culp
Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-04 Thread David Gurvich
For youtube, gnash works better than linux-flashplugin7 and worse than wine+flash9 on i386. I understand that amd64 has difficulties with wine, making gnash or similar the only option. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-03 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to

Re: Flashplugin

2008-08-03 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500 Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Unfortunately, I don't think Adobe is likely to give a damn about people who would switch to FreeBSD (or FreeBSD spin-off like PC-BSD) if there do we need whole lot FreeBSD users? no. after certain amount of users quality starts to go down. the same was with linux whether there's a current,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread prad
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: simply don't use flash if it's author don't want you to do it - as that's what exactly is. they want only windoze and linux users to use flash, so don't use it. i don't use flash - don't need to see all those

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
flash, so don't use it. i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway. i don't use it because sites that RELY on flash rarely (almost never) have any useful contents. i occasionally like to see some

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Gerard
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: flash, so don't use it. i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway. i don't use it because sites that RELY on flash

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable. If I navigate to a URL, I fully expect to be able to view all of that site's content

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:11:50PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable. If I navigate

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Wojciech Puchar
But I agree with you: Flash is not always shit or not needed. Quite a yes you are right. not always, just USUALLY. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread prad
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, businesses that allow their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing to manage their business and are welcome to go ahead and

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread Mario Lobo
On Monday 16 June 2008 16:49:45 prad wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, businesses that allow their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing to

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread cpghost
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:50 +0200 dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable. If

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-16 Thread RW
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:36:36 +0200 cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with Flash is neither ... but the fact that Flash *content* itself is being routinely blocked / filtered at the edge of many corporate networks for security reasons, That's sounds more like the beginning of a

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-15 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:34:17AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use PC-BSD.

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
Quoting Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does is

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
Quoting herbert langhans [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not perfect, but it will do in many cases. http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html Excellent howto Herb. My problem is that it seems that firefox-devel doesn't work with

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread Robert Huff
eculp writes: I've got a question. A friend has been loaning me his old laptop at work that runs Ubuntu and flash runs fine. I have not been able to make it fail, yet at least. Could there be a clue in Ubuntu somewhare? I'm actually thinking of running it under kqemu, if there isn't

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-11 Thread eculp
Quoting Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: eculp writes: I've got a question. A friend has been loaning me his old laptop at work that runs Ubuntu and flash runs fine. I have not been able to make it fail, yet at least. Could there be a clue in Ubuntu somewhare? I'm actually thinking of

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-10 Thread herbert langhans
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not perfect, but it will do in many cases. http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html Cheers herbs -- *** Herbert Langhans, Warschau *** Sprachtraining Langhans *** http://www.langhans.com.pl *** [EMAIL

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-09 Thread Jerry McAllister
.] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flashplugin Flash is a big pain IMO. The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread sergio lenzi
Well... Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools machines with 13 120gb of disk turion 64... All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks in the first year... With a total of 35000 notebooks in 3 years... and counting... may be a total of 100,000 notebooks in 5 years...

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Derek Graham
on Sunday 08 June 2008Sunday 08 June 2008 sergio lenzi sergio lenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well... Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools machines with 13 120gb of disk turion 64... All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks in the first year... With a total

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Saturday 07 June 2008 23:16:34 Jerry McAllister wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use PC-BSD. Wine is making some GREAT Progress, and very shortly if not already,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Lars Eighner
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread dick hoogendijk
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:16:34 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:01:36AM -0300, sergio lenzi wrote: Well... Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools machines with 13 120gb of disk turion 64... All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks in the first year... With a total of 35000 notebooks in 3

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Jerry McAllister wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:01:36AM -0300, sergio lenzi wrote: Well... Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools machines with 13 120gb of disk turion 64... All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks in the first year... With a total of 35000

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but crashes on Flash. What version of wine are you using? I believe they fixed

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-08 Thread Lars Eighner
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but crashes on Flash. What version of

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to see

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, I have tried using

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be forced to run windowish solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these modern times,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be forced to run windowish solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these modern times, although lots of fbsd people tend to say it is not. That's not everyday's live however. FreeBSD does not make the web. I agree, I made a comment, last

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be forced to run windowish solution. The OS is

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread LtCdData
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Derek Graham wrote: Hey all, I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too well at least with firefox. One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Alastair Hogge
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote: on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam

RE: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Tobias Hoellrich
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flashplugin Flash is a big pain IMO. The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times on this list. The answer usually boils down to use www/nspluginwrapper or use linux

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9 plugin People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be forced to run windowish

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Alastair Hogge Alastair Hogge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote: on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM,

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Jona Joachim Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500 Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Derek Graham
not making any statements for Adobe.] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Flashplugin Flash is a big pain IMO. The Flash question

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Camilo Reyes
Well, there is a site that does BSD usage statistics (they recently did a post on this list). I recommend people use their script to raise the stats. http://www.bsdstats.org/  Camilo Bono Vince Malum Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:09:08 -0700 From: Tobias Hoellrich Subject: RE: Flashplugin

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin

2008-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tobias Hoellrich wrote: Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many *desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-03 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:30:58 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, here are my computer properties: evo n800v compaq laptop with 1.8 ghz and 512 ram. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nspluginwrapper -a -v -i Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Christopher Hilton
Ozan Enginoglu wrote: After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses a lot of CPU power! I removed flash plugin libs from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and plugins directory of firefox. Now i can surf

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:00 +0300, Ozan Enginoglu wrote: After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses a lot of CPU power! I removed flash plugin libs from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-02 Thread Ozan Enginoglu
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 05:36 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200 Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And is there any way to play flash files without using nspluginwrapper?

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-01 Thread Nikola Lecic
Hello, On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses a lot of CPU power! I removed flash plugin libs from

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-01 Thread Ozan Enginoglu
Thanks for the quick reply, On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:01 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: Hello, On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-01 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick reply, Sure! On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:01 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote: Hello, On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-01 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200 Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And is there any way to play flash files without using nspluginwrapper? Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...). There

Re: Flashplugin problem after xorg 7.2 upgrade

2007-06-01 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200 Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300 Ozan Enginoglu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] And is there any way to play flash files without using nspluginwrapper? Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firefox...).

Re: flashplugin on amd64

2007-02-28 Thread Guillaume
Andriy Babiy a écrit : Hi all. Simple question: = # make install clean === linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_7 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. = Is there another way to get it working on

Re: flashplugin on amd64

2007-02-28 Thread Paulette McGee
--- Andriy Babiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. Simple question: = # make install clean === linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_7 is only for i386, and you are running amd64.. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper. = Is there another

Re: FlashPlugin for Mozilla FireFox

2007-02-20 Thread Bachilo Dmitry
В сообщении от Среда 21 февраля 2007 11:50 Warren Liddell написал(a): Im running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE an dhave been trying to get flash working in FireFox to no avail. I have the plugin installed but it made no difference upon restarting the browser. What maybe wrong or may i be missing for it

Re: flashplugin not working

2006-03-02 Thread dgmm
On Thursday 02 March 2006 23:30, Warren Liddell wrote: Im using Freebsd6.1-pre I have the flash pluginwrapper isntalled and not sure if i need anything else, to get flash working in Mozilla .. as presently it isnt and im slowly getting sick of accessing all the sites i need to and not being

  1   2   >