Hello,
> Hello all , I want to install a Mail Server with Webmail,
>
> Anybody to know a good Stable Mail Server and Web Mail
I recommend the following step-by-step instructions:
http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4
--
Zbigniew Szalbot
www.fairtra
Hello all , I want to install a Mail Server with Webmail,
Anybody to know a good Stable Mail Server and Web Mail
I will appreciate
Thanks all
John Dakos
Network Administrator
Enovation Technologies
Filellinon 35, Chalandrion
15232 Athens, GREECE
Tel: +30-210
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:53:28 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
> > fetchmail, gotcha. I'll look into that.
>
> I'm using it myself and I'm still happy with it. The advantage is
> that you can use it for more than just one POP account.
>
In this case tha
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:53:28 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
> fetchmail, gotcha. I'll look into that.
I'm using it myself and I'm still happy with it. The advantage is
that you can use it for more than just one POP account.
> The Outlook Express deal is not for me, that's for another person who needs
Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
> Liontaur wrote:
>> Hi folks, I was searching around but i'm not quite sure what i'm looking
>> for. I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
>> (pop), stores the mail permanently, allows me webmail access, and a
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:26 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
> > I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
> > (pop), stores the mail permanently,
>
> This would be a task for fetchmail. It stores the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 13:49, Jon Radel wrote:
> Polytropon wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:26 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
>>
>
> I'd like to be able
>>> to sync the mail with outlook express also.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you can get Redmond to give you the source code of
>> their... erm... stuff, so
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:30 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
> > Liontaur wrote:
> >> Hi folks, I was searching around but i'm not quite sure what i'm looking
> >> for. I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP ma
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:49:01 -0400, Jon Radel wrote:
> At least one person here, and it may well be me, is somewhat confused.
>
> Outlook <> Outlook Express
Maybe. The original question included no reference to "Outlook"
but "Outlook Express". Forgive me my lack of knowledge, but I've
never used
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:26 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
I'd like to be able
to sync the mail with outlook express also.
Maybe you can get Redmond to give you the source code of
their... erm... stuff, so you can see how to interact
with it. :-)
At least one person here, and i
Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
Liontaur wrote:
Hi folks, I was searching around but i'm not quite sure what i'm looking
for. I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
(pop), stores the mail permanently, allows me webmail access, and
also lets
me grab the mail w
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:26 -0700, Liontaur wrote:
> I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
> (pop), stores the mail permanently,
This would be a task for fetchmail. It stores the mail
in mbox format in /var/mail/$USER, so you can chose any
mail prog
Liontaur wrote:
Hi folks, I was searching around but i'm not quite sure what i'm looking
for. I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
(pop), stores the mail permanently, allows me webmail access, and also lets
me grab the mail with a mail client (Outlook Exp
Hi folks, I was searching around but i'm not quite sure what i'm looking
for. I want to have a program that gets the mail from my ISP mail server
(pop), stores the mail permanently, allows me webmail access, and also lets
me grab the mail with a mail client (Outlook Express). I'd
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
> we have here a mail server running in FreeBSD 6.2 which is holding out 2
> domain (e.g u...@mydomain.com. w...@mydomain2.com) and it running very good,
> unfortunately I'm not the person who configure this mail stuff.
>
> heres
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:49:52 +0800, Ruel Luchavez
wrote:
> Hi list..
>
> we have here a mail server running in FreeBSD 6.2 which is holding out
> 2 domain (e.g u...@mydomain.com. w...@mydomain2.com) and it running
> very good, unfortunately I'm not the person who configu
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
> Hi list..
>
> we have here a mail server running in FreeBSD 6.2 which is holding out 2
> domain (e.g u...@mydomain.com. w...@mydomain2.com) and it running very
> good,
> unfortunately I'm not the person who co
Hi,
> we bought a new domain (e.g mydomain3.com) and Im planning to add the domain
> to our mail server so that I could create a new email ad with the new domain
> (e.g us...@mydomain3.com). how will I do that?
I am afraid no one can answer right now, there are many different
software
Hi list..
we have here a mail server running in FreeBSD 6.2 which is holding out 2
domain (e.g u...@mydomain.com. w...@mydomain2.com) and it running very good,
unfortunately I'm not the person who configure this mail stuff.
heres my problem:
we bought a new domain (e.g mydomain3.com) a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Karlos Linale
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: mail server
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if you could he
Karlos Linale wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if you could help me.
For some reason I keep getting hundreds of emails on my mail server spool
which are being sent to your email address. Are you able to tell me how and
why this is happening?
I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Karlos Linale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if you could help me.
>
> For some reason I keep getting hundreds of emails on my mail server spool
> which are being sent to your email address. Are you able to tell
Hello,
I was wondering if you could help me.
For some reason I keep getting hundreds of emails on my mail server spool
which are being sent to your email address. Are you able to tell me how and
why this is happening?
Thanks
Karl Linale
kde4 kmail set up, but it does not see mail on my mail
>server:: aristotle.thought.org. Anybody help me with this?
Do you get some error message from KMail like "connection refused", "wrong
password" or something? What mail-protocol are you using?
--
Servus,
I didn't set up my LAN and the guy who did, didn't explain enough
to help me get too far with things-kde3 in /usr/local/bin to
everything-kde4 in /usr/local/kde4/bin/*
I just got kde4 kmail set up, but it does not see mail on my mail
Andrew Falanga wrote:
> ...
> While diagnosing this, I connect to the server (using Putty) from a
> machine in PN1, using either a mail client or telnet I'm unable to make
> a connection to the mail server over port 25. Using tcpdump during this
> putty session I do not even
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Clients in the churches private network cannot send mail using this
server, though they can receive mail from it (POP). The church has a
private network, PN1, and the mail server sits at a church members house
because he has a static IP address; let's call tha
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't take a rocket scientist, or a computer scientist, to
figure out we've got DNS issues.
What exactly is the problem though? What problems are you having on
the mail server that lead you to the
27;ve got it improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
Now, our mail server's IP is 192.168.2.23. On the route
7;ve got
it improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
Now, our mail server's IP is 192.168.2.23. On the ro
properly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
Now, our mail server's IP is 192.168.2.23. On the router, he (the person at
Andrew Falanga wrote:
*Not having* a reverse entry for a mail server is often
the cause of issues.
This I do know very well. I had similar problems when running a sendmail
backup spooler for Syracuse Networks back in 2000. The eventual solution was
that our ISP delegated control of our
DNS and how we've got
> it improperly configured.
>
> First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
>
> 192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
> Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
>
> N
got it improperly configured.
>
> First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
>
> 192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
> Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
>
> Now, our mail server's IP is 1
#x27;ve got it
improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists in the world:
192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
Now, our mail server's IP is 192.168.2.23. On the rout
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't take a rocket scientist, or a computer scientist, to
> figure out we've got DNS issues.
What exactly is the problem though? What problems are you having on
the mail server that lead you to the above conclusion?
--
w our mail server exists in the world:
192.168.2.x/24 72.24.23.252 "lot's of networks"
Private Network <--> CableOne <--> Internet
Now, our mail server's IP is 192.168.2.23. On the router, he (the person at
whose house the mail server is) has IP forw
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
of my problems are related to DNS and how we've got it improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists i
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Matthew Seaman schrieb:
> If you're using sendmail as your MTA, then look at
> implementing the following features in your $(hostname).mc:
Would that mean a file called
/etc/mail/pukruppa.net.mc
in my case? Since I get
# hostname
pukruppa.net
or do I
Sorry, I forgot to post to the list!
Matthew Seaman schrieb:
> Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
>> Steve Bertrand schrieb:
>>> Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
>
>>>> for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my
>>>&g
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hello,
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small)
mail server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even
with my own ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Matthew's message beat me to the response but I had typed
one. There are some great
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Steve Bertrand schrieb:
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small)
mail server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even with
my own ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The only way to tell for certain is to review
On Aug 27, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small)
mail server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even
with my own ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
1) How is this possible?
Forging email headers is trivial. You can
Steve Bertrand schrieb:
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hello,
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small) mail
server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even with my
own ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
How have you identified that they are actually being delivered by
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 11:40 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small) mail
> > server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even with my own
> > ([EMA
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hello,
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small) mail
server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even with my own
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
How have you identified that they are actually being delivered by your
server itself?
It
Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small) mail
> server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even with my own
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> 1) How is this possible?
> 2) What can I or do I have to
Hello,
for some time now I keep receiving spam mails from my own (small)
mail server, some of them with faked usernames some of them even
with my own ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
1) How is this possible?
2) What can I or do I have to do against it?
I am running a quite plain sendmail setup from
Hi Andrew,
Nice name :)
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
--snip--
I've verified the same timeout behavior with Outlook Express and Thunderbird.
Using Thunderbird, I was able to check different settings too. The settings
should be to use authentication on the smtp server using SSL. Someone,
Hi,
Thanks again everyone for the pointers with Outlook and my fellow church
parishoners. I'm hoping for some more pointers. Using tcpdump I'm fairly
certain that the initial SYN packets from the clients are never reaching the
server. I'll need to test one more time to be sure (I wasn't 100%
Hello,
mailserver. However, never having done this before myself, I was
wondering if anyone here
had any useful comments about this guide, particularly if you think it's
missing any key points
that will leave me cursing at my monitor late one night.
I'm currently planning on using FreeBSD 7.0
On Thursday 31 July 2008 03:31:36 Barry Byrne wrote:
>
> Andrew:
>
> I've seen a similar problem from time to time with Outlook 2003 clients.
> For seemingly no reason whatsoever, they give a timeout sending mail.
> Googling the error code throws up many with the same error and no solution
> that
"Jack Raats" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I should add postgrey and clamsmtp.
> Postgrey is a very good greylisting filter for postfix and clamsmtp I use
Actually, doing the greylisting via spamd (the one that comes with PF)
might be a better option (and it earns you the opportunity to do
greytr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Falanga
> I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that
> folks are able to
> receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently
> confi
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using
the church e
On Thursday 31 July 2008 02:35, Andrew Falanga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able
> to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for
> POP3 (I use dovecot).
>
> At home I tried to send mail to
Le Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:35:17 -0600,
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are
> able to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently
> configured for POP3 (I use dovecot).
>
&
At 07:35 PM 7/30/2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using
the church e-mail server and was
> http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4
does anyone have any links or step by step howto's to do this exact same thing
as purplehat.org, but only with PostgreSQL as the backend.
I prefer BSD licensed software when I can use it, but I have always had trouble
finding documented setups with FreeBSD an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I posted a few weeks ago about being interested in building a FreeBSD based
mail server, and got a lot of good input. In my research since then, I
found
I posted a few weeks ago about being interested in building a FreeBSD based
mail server, and got a lot of good input. In my research since then, I
found
this:
http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4
Which seems to me to be a pretty good guide to building a FreeBSD based
Postifx/SpamAssassin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Giorgos
> Keramidas
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:06 PM
> To: DAve
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
>
>
> This freebs
On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:39:03 -0400, DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Zimmerman wrote:
>> heres some interesting reading about qmail...
>> http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
>
> That so much time and effort is spent telling everyone how bad qmail
> is still amazes me.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:09:25PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
>
>
> I agree. No one should use Qmail unless they have read and completely
> understand every email-related RFC and have at least two years of
> experience running a commercial mail server. Amateurs shouldn't ev
Catalin Miclaus wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Procacci
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:21 PM
To: Bob Johnson
Cc: DAve; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
Bob Johnson wrote:
On 5/30
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Procacci
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:21 PM
To: Bob Johnson
Cc: DAve; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server
Bob Johnson wrote:
> On 5/30/08, DAve <[EMAIL PRO
I'd personally vouch for Qmail myself.
So would I, for my environment.
Having been an administrator now
for mail servers in general for nearly 15 years, with experience with
most notable mailers, Qmail by far lends itself to be the most highly
configurable mailer assuming you know what you
ompletely
understand every email-related RFC and have at least two years of
experience running a commercial mail server. Amateurs shouldn't even
consider it.
Please, use anything but Qmail. It sprays backscatter spam all over
the internet.
- Bob
__
t; Postfix, also a very capable MTA.
I agree. No one should use Qmail unless they have read and completely
understand every email-related RFC and have at least two years of
experience running a commercial mail server. Amateurs shouldn't even
consider it.
Please, use anything but Qmail. It s
On Friday 30 May 2008 18:09:48 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> exim: If I were setting up a large complicated installation for say an
> ISP or a mail hosting system, exim is what I would use. I've heard
> people say that they didn't understand the configuration file, but I
> don't see what the problem
still true, then I don't care if qmail turns out to be a
great way to manage your mail server. It is a terrible network citizen.
Anyway, here are my personal prejudices about MTAs:
Sendmail: There was a time when I would set things up for clients
with sendmail because if I got hit by a
y
> Qmail, its ok, in most cases scenerios
> Exim - No way
>
> and Dovecot or Cyrus for imaps/imap
>
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Patrick Baldwin wrote:
>> > Hi all, I've got an ol
On Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:56 -0400
"N.J. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-29
> 13:35:27-0400]:
> > I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers
> > that would make for the best Fre
Eric Zimmerman wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
I like Qmail. It's not overly difficult to configure, and it's
extensible.
and requires 400 patches to do basic things =(
List them, not 100, not 399, all 400 please.
Keep in mind that when your download x.x.x release of a software package
you are down
wrote:
> Patrick Baldwin wrote:
> > Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> > mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
> > thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
> >
>
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
> Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
> thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
>
> However, it's been some t
Foo JH wrote:
I like Qmail. It's not overly difficult to configure, and it's extensible.
and requires 400 patches to do basic things =(
heres some interesting reading about qmail...
http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
___
f
I like Qmail. It's not overly difficult to configure, and it's extensible.
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice
On May 29, 2008, at 16:55, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for
Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
> thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
FreeBSD == good choi
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into opti
On Thu, 29 May 2008 15:52:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
>> Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
>> mail server right now. It's about time to
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> > mail server right now. It's about time t
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:35:27PM -0400, Patrick Baldwin wrote:
> Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
> thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
Give
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:50 PM, N.J. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-29
> 13:35:27-0400]:
> > I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
> > would make for the best FreeBSD base
* Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-29 13:35:27-0400]:
> I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail servers that
> would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
A third vote for Postfix + Dovecot here.
Thomas
--
N.J. Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eti
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Patrick Baldwin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
> mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
> thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the
Patrick Baldwin wrote:
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into opti
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:35:27 -0400
Patrick Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested in both suggestions for hardware and mail
> servers that would make for the best FreeBSD based mail server.
>
i like postfix with dovecot. (we do imap for about half-a-dozen use
Hi all, I've got an older Solaris system running Sendmail for my
mail server right now. It's about time to replace it, and I'm
thinking FreeBSD might be the best choice of OS for the replacement.
However, it's been some time since I looked into options for mail
servers. I&
Vince Hoffman wrote:
> brad davison wrote:
>
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>> Subject: Re: telnet to mail server fro
brad davison wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet
>> from inside w
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:49:07 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet from
> inside works
>
> > Trying ::1...
> > Connected to lo
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.x.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 email.x.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:01:39
-0400 (EDT)
But if I try the same thing from 'outside' the firewall I get:
%telnet email..com 25
Trying 67.x.x.x...
Connect
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:04 AM, brad davison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there something I need to configure in telnetd or sendmail to allow
> 'outside' IP addresses to telnet to the mail server and get a 220 response?
>
> When I 'telnet localhost 25&
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:55:42 -0500
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: telnet to mail server from outside does not get 220, telnet
> from inside works
>
> On May 12, 2008, at 9:04 AM, brad daviso
On May 12, 2008, at 9:04 AM, brad davison wrote:
But if I try the same thing from 'outside' the firewall I get:
%telnet email..com 25
Trying 67.x.x.x...
Connected to email.xxx.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.
Have you checked to see what yo
Is there something I need to configure in telnetd or sendmail to allow
'outside' IP addresses to telnet to the mail server and get a 220 response?
When I 'telnet localhost 25' i get:
email# telnet localhost 25
Trying ::1...
Connected to localhost.x.com.
Escape ch
At 09:20 AM 4/16/2008, John Almberg wrote:
I have a FreeBSD web/mail server in a colocation facility. They offer
many fixed and burstable bandwidth options. I am currently using
512Kbits fixed, which limits data transfer to around 64K up and down,
simultaneously. This works okay at the moment
101 - 200 of 579 matches
Mail list logo
