> >> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
> >>
> >> # pkg_info -orx linux > linux-stuff
> >> # pkg_delete -rx linux
> >>
> >> # cd /compat/linux
> >> # find . -type f -ls
> >> # rm -rf *
> >>
> >> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16
David Collins wrote:
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I
try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and
re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles.
I tried the following:
This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that
I never had tried to install Linux flash. I did install Windows flash
under Firefox on Wine and it worked. I found that the freebsd port for
Wine would not work but if I downloaded the source from WineHQ and
compiled it would work fine, however, i tried a more recent version of
Wine which did n
I have periodically tested with getting flash working, and everytime I
try it fails and I go back to undoing everything I have done and
re-installing gnash. Gnash works but it does have a few niggles.
I tried the following:
> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 03:32 +, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 +
> Freminlins wrote:
>
>
> > I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD
> > a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the
> > misery of installing heaps of crud jus
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:04:24 +
Freminlins wrote:
> I must admit I gave up ever getting Flash to work RELIABLY on FreeBSD
> a long time ago. It's just too hard, too much work, and not worth the
> misery of installing heaps of crud just to get a flipping browser
> plugin working unreliably.
S
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
>> Polytropon Polytropon replied:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>
>>> That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
>>> need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you fr
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
>
> You don't really believe that do you. Web creators attempt to make their
> sites accessible to the largest possible audience. It is probably cost
> prohibited, if even reasonably possible to make a site 100% vi
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:55:20 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
> Polytropon Polytropon replied:
>
> [snip]
>
> >That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
> >need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from
> >properly accessing it, it's thei
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:25:53 +0100
Polytropon Polytropon replied:
[snip]
>That's not FreeBSD's fault. If "professional web designers"
>need to "optimize" their content in order to prevent you from
>properly accessing it, it's their fault. I would complain to
>them, or just ignore them. Content t
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:24 -0400, PJ wrote:
> Yeah, but stupid errors are not.
Nobody can make all the errors.
> anyway I goofed somewhere. but what is strange is that
> the only obvious problem I have is this flashplugin - no matter what I
> do, I cannot get it to work.
But obviously, as o
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400, PJ wrote:
>
>> And I do wish I could use only FreeBSD... the
>> problem is that there are some limitations on compatibility with the
>> "normal" user's MS systems...
>>
>
> You're mixing up things here. Things in MICROS~1 land are
> n
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400, PJ wrote:
> And I do wish I could use only FreeBSD... the
> problem is that there are some limitations on compatibility with the
> "normal" user's MS systems...
You're mixing up things here. Things in MICROS~1 land are
not compatible to the rest of the world.
Tony McC wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +
> Tony McC wrote:
>
>
>> Hi PJ,
>>
>> ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different
>> kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the
>> part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:00:00 +
Tony McC wrote:
> Hi PJ,
>
> ok, I tried (I was also trying to offer you support, just a different
> kind). There was a lot of irrelevant material in your response but the
> part I have quoted shows such a deep misunderstanding of what I was
> trying to suggest
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:13:02 -0400
PJ wrote:
> But to study the manual is beyond the capabilities of anyone ... sure,
> you can read it and study it... but you will forget anything you have
> read almost immediately if you are not applying what you are studying
> at once... there may be some resi
Tony McC wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100
> Polytropon wrote:
>
>
>> In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The
>> misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that
>> other people have to deal with problems, while the
>> user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use.
>
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC wrote:
>
>> You seem to want everything to just work without
>> having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you?
>> [...]
>> But my
>> guess is that you really would be happier and more productive with a
>> Wi
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:10:25 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> In "Windows", things don't work without thinking. The
> misbelief that is does is grounded in the fact that
> other people have to deal with problems, while the
> user praises "Windows" for its easyness of use.
>
> In PJ's case, maybe PC-BSD
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:53:18 +, Tony McC wrote:
> You seem to want everything to just work without
> having to think about it, so perhaps Windows would be better for you?
> [...]
> But my
> guess is that you really would be happier and more productive with a
> Windows OS. That isn't meant to
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:43:11 -0500
PJ wrote:
> I wish someone could explain to me why I am no longer able to install
> flashplugin ... none of the methods work for me on amy version... I
> have literally tried them all..
> the latest was linux-f10 - I cleaned out all the linux stuff,
> umounted
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote:
I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with
flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so
cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be
found... It's there allright and is linked t
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:11 -0400, PJ wrote:
> I have tried them all... now I have linux-f10 with
> flashplayer10 installed and all I get is an error that flashplugin.so
> cannot be started because a shared file "freetype.so.6" cannot be
> found... It's there allright and is linked to fretype.so.
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
> Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE
> should work too..
>
> supose you use AMD64
>
> 1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable)
> (sem_enable=YES) in the loader.conf
> 2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/
Ok... supose you use FreeBSD 7.2 P3 (last version) but the RELEASE
should work too..
supose you use AMD64
1) compile a custom kernel with SEM (semaphore enable) (sem_enable=YES)
in the loader.conf
2) deinstall all linux stuff, remove the /compat/linux from the system,
deinstall all pkg with
Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell
that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter,
to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially
since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a Micros
>
> That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell
> that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter,
> to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially
> since I can do it in a matter of seconds on a Microsoft product.
>
Strang
--On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 04:13:52 -0500 Jerry wrote:
That is precisely why I keep an XP box nearby. There is no way in hell
that I would want to personally, or expect a colleague for that matter,
to waste valuable time getting a simple plug-in to work; especially
since I can do it in a ma
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:06:30 -0400
PJ PJ replied:
>Thank you very much Herbert,
>
>I appreciate your input.
>As I wrote in my original query, I had auccessfully installed the
>lilnux-flashplugin9 on FreeBSD 7.2 both on a 64 bit portable _ Acer
>Travelmate 4400 - and on a couple of disks on the sa
Freminlins wrote:
> 2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman
>
>
>
>>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32
>>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32:
>>
>>Depends on:
>>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2
>>Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g
>>Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> PJ wrote:
>> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
>> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
>> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
>
> This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compat
Thank you very much Herbert,
I appreciate your input.
As I wrote in my original query, I had auccessfully installed the
lilnux-flashplugin9 on FreeBSD 7.2 both on a 64 bit portable _ Acer
Travelmate 4400 - and on a couple of disks on the same machine (i386). I
followed the instructions from
http:
2009/10/25 Matthew Seaman
>% pkg_info -r linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32
>Information for linux-f10-flashplugin-10.0r32:
>
>Depends on:
>Dependency: linux_base-f10-10_2
>Dependency: linux-f10-openssl-0.9.8g
>Dependency: linux-f10-openldap-2.4.12_1
>Dependency: linux-f10
PJ wrote:
Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
This is what I did for a 7.2 box. Note that there are compatibility
issues between new versio
I have some instructions on http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html - not
updated for a while, but it might be some useful input.
Cheers
herb langhans
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:56:58PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
> I was able to install it on
Glen Barber wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote:
>
>> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
>> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
>> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
>>
>
> Any er
Howdy,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:56 PM, PJ wrote:
> Is there any definitive install guide for flashplugin.
> I was able to install it on a 7.2 64bit machine and then on an i386 but
> somehow it has morphed into god-knows-what and no longer works.
Any errors?
> I thought I had installed it with
For youtube, gnash works better than linux-flashplugin7 and worse than
wine+flash9 on i386. I understand that amd64 has difficulties with
wine, making gnash or similar the only option.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
"Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey all,
I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
work too well at least with firefox.
One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
> Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
>> work too well at least with firefox.
>> One ... I pr
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:00:27 -0500
Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to
> work too well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be abl
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:36:36 +0200
cpghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with Flash is neither ...
>
> but the fact that Flash *content* itself is being routinely blocked /
> filtered at the edge of many corporate networks for security reasons,
That's sounds more like the beginning o
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:11:50 +0200
dick hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
> Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download
> > content from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just
> > unacc
On Monday 16 June 2008 16:49:45 prad wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400
>
> Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, businesses that allow
> > their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any
> > other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:45 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, businesses that allow
> their web designer to supplant his|her ego by putting flash or any
> other cute trick in the way of getting business done are failing to
> manage their business and are welcome to go ahead
But I agree with you: Flash is not always shit or not needed. Quite a
yes you are right. not always, just USUALLY.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:11:50PM +0200, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
> Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content
> > from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable.
> > If I
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:05:19 -0400
Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All this nonsense about using third party programs to download content
> from sites such as, but not limited to YouTube, is just unacceptable.
> If I navigate to a URL, I fully expect to be able to view all of that
> site's con
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:53:05 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> flash, so don't use it.
> >>
> > i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and
> > quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway.
>
> i don't use it because sites that R
flash, so don't use it.
i don't use flash - don't need to see all those advertizements. and
quite frankly, i generally find flash sites irritating anyway.
i don't use it because sites that RELY on flash rarely (almost never) have
any useful contents.
i occasionally like to see some things
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:17:12 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> simply don't use flash if it's author don't want you to do it - as
> that's what exactly is. they want only windoze and linux users to use
> flash, so don't use it.
>
i don't use flash - don't need to see all th
Unfortunately, I don't think Adobe is likely to give a damn about people
who would switch to FreeBSD (or FreeBSD spin-off like PC-BSD) if there
do we need whole lot FreeBSD users? no. after certain amount of users
quality starts to go down. the same was with linux
whether there's a current,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:34:17AM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there
> are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows
> 2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use
> PC-BSD.
Quoting "Robert Huff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
eculp writes:
I've got a question. A friend has been loaning me his old laptop
at work that runs Ubuntu and flash runs fine. I have not been
able to make it fail, yet at least. Could there be a clue in
Ubuntu somewhare? I'm actually thinking o
eculp writes:
> I've got a question. A friend has been loaning me his old laptop
> at work that runs Ubuntu and flash runs fine. I have not been
> able to make it fail, yet at least. Could there be a clue in
> Ubuntu somewhare? I'm actually thinking of running it under
> kqemu, if there i
Quoting "herbert langhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running.
Not perfect, but it will do in many cases.
http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html
Excellent howto Herb. My problem is that it seems that firefox-devel
doesn't work wi
Quoting "Derek Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hey all,
I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work too
well at least with firefox.
One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all it does i
There are some instructions how you can get the Flashplayer running. Not
perfect, but it will do in many cases.
http://freebsd.langhans.com.pl/af/index.html
Cheers
herbs
--
*** Herbert Langhans, Warschau
*** Sprachtraining Langhans
*** http://www.langhans.com.pl
*** [EMAIL PROTE
tements
> for Adobe.]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Flashplugin
> >
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but
crashes on Flash.
What version of w
> That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
> browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
> Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs and linux-firefox which handles pdfs, but
> crashes on Flash.
>
What version of wine are you using? I believe they fixe
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:01:36AM -0300, sergio lenzi wrote:
Well...
Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools
machines with 13" 120gb of disk turion 64...
All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks
in the first year...
With a total of 35000
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:01:36AM -0300, sergio lenzi wrote:
> Well...
>
> Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools
> machines with 13" 120gb of disk turion 64...
> All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks
> in the first year...
>
> With a total of 35000 notebooks in
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:16:34 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install th
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
plugin
That worked like a charm, but Adobe Reader 8.12 not only crashes the
browser, but also wine and X. So now I have wine firefox which can handle
Flash 9, but crashes on pdfs
for what it is worth, between 3 companies that I do consulting for, there
are about 250 workstations that currently use, Windows ME, or Windows
2000.Flash and Microsoft Outlook remain the only 2 reasons we can not use
PC-BSD. Wine is making some GREAT Progress, and very shortly if not already,
Outl
On Saturday 07 June 2008 23:16:34 Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> >
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> > >
on Sunday 08 June 2008Sunday 08 June 2008 sergio lenzi sergio lenzi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well...
>
> Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools
> machines with 13" 120gb of disk turion 64...
> All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks
> in the first year...
>
> Wit
Well...
Here I am in a project of notebooks for schools
machines with 13" 120gb of disk turion 64...
All of them running FreeBSD 7.0 it is about 7000 notebooks
in the first year...
With a total of 35000 notebooks in 3 years... and counting...
may be a total of 100,000 notebooks in 5 years...
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Tobias Hoellrich wrote:
Since the last discussion I actually contacted the Flash Player team and
asked what it would take to get an official port for Flash Player on
FreeBSD. I was asked to provide numbers that would indicate how many
*desktop* FreeBSD systems are out there and how many of them
Well, there is a site that does BSD usage statistics (they recently did a
post on this list). I recommend people use their script to raise the stats.
http://www.bsdstats.org/
Camilo
"Bono Vince Malum"
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:09:08 -0700
> From: "Tobias Hoellrich"
s a long-time FreeBSD user and I'm not making any statements
> for Adobe.]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> > To: freebsd-questio
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Jona Joachim Jona Joachim
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> >
> > "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Alastair Hogge Alastair Hogge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote:
> > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam
> > Fourman
> >
> > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 7,
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> > plugin
>
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run win
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jona Joachim
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:58 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Flashplugin
>
> Flash is a big pain IMO.
> The Flash question has been asked *a lot* of times on this list.
> The answer usually bo
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:56 Derek Graham wrote:
> on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
>
> Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourma
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Derek Graham wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> too well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be able to see the flash video but all
On 2008-06-07, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
> "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
>> plugin
>
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
> sol
> People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
> solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these
> modern times, although lots of fbsd people tend to say it is not.
> That's not everyday's live however. FreeBSD does not make the web.
>
>
I agree, I made a commen
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:33:26 -0500
"Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use Firefox for Windows and use wine, then install the windows Flash 9
> plugin
People choosing FreeBSD shouldn't be "forced" to run windowish
solution. The OS is not supported. That's a major problem in these
modern
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam
> > Fourman
> >
> > Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
> Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I have t
on Saturday 07 June 2008Saturday 07 June 2008 Sam Fourman Jr. "Sam Fourman
Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> > too
> > well at le
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Derek Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have tried using swfdec-plugin to do flash, but it doesnt seem to work
> too
> well at least with firefox.
> One ... I prefer being able to select what flash loads automaticly and
> Two ... I like to be able t
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:30:58 +0300
Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, here are my computer properties: evo n800v compaq laptop with 1.8
> ghz and 512 ram.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nspluginwrapper -a -v -i
> Auto-install plugins from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins
>
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 05:36 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200
> Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300
> > Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > And is there any way to play flash files without using
> > > "
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:00 +0300, Ozan Enginoglu wrote:
> After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to
> crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses a lot
> of CPU power!
>
> I removed flash plugin libs from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and
> p
Ozan Enginoglu wrote:
After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used to
crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses a lot
of CPU power!
I removed flash plugin libs from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins and
plugins directory of firefox. Now i can surf w
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300
> Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > And is there any way to play flash files without using
> > "nspluginwrapper"?
>
> Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-f
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007 04:35:33 +0200
Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300
> Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > And is there any way to play flash files without using
> > "nspluginwrapper"?
>
> Only in linux versions (linux-opera, linux-firef
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 04:13:59 +0300
Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply,
Sure!
> On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:01 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300
> > Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > After i upgra
Thanks for the quick reply,
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 02:01 +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300
> Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used
> > to crast when i enter a site with a lot o
Hello,
On Sat, 02 Jun 2007 02:00:44 +0300
Ozan Enginoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After i upgrated to xorg 7.2 i had firefox core-dump problem. It used
> to crast when i enter a site with a lot of flash plugin. And it uses
> a lot of CPU power!
>
> I removed flash plugin libs from /usr/loca
--- Andriy Babiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
> Simple question:
>
> =
> # make install clean
> ===> linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_7 is only for
> i386, and you are running
> amd64..
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper.
>
> =
>
> Is
Andriy Babiy a écrit :
> Hi all.
> Simple question:
>
> =
> # make install clean
> ===> linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_7 is only for i386, and you are running
> amd64..
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper.
>
> =
>
> Is there another way to get
В сообщении от Среда 21 февраля 2007 11:50 Warren Liddell написал(a):
> Im running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE an dhave been trying to get flash working in
> FireFox to no avail. I have the plugin installed but it made no difference
> upon restarting the browser.
>
> What maybe wrong or may i be missing fo
On Thursday 02 March 2006 23:30, Warren Liddell wrote:
> Im using Freebsd6.1-pre
>
> I have the flash pluginwrapper isntalled and not sure if i need anything
> else, to get flash working in Mozilla .. as presently it isnt and im slowly
> getting sick of accessing all the sites i need to and not bei
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
