ynamical interpretant--its actual effect on that
individual interpreter--along with the sign being analyzed. Hence, the *same
*sign can have *different *dynamical interpretants for different
interpreters who have different collateral experience and different habits
of interpretation.
Regards,
Jon Alan
," I prefer to
call it "mediating" because Peirce more generally defines a sign as
"anything, of whatsoever mode of being, which mediates between an object
and an interpretant" (EP 2:410, 1907).
Regards,
Jon
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:08 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
&
object through the mediation of this
"sign." The object and the interpretant are thus merely the two correlates
of the sign; the one being antecedent, the other consequent of the sign.
(EP 2:410, 1907)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher,
by that interpretant. Hence, the object
determines the interpretant through the mediation of the sign while being
unaffected by that interpretant.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com
elation of mediating (or
representing) *involves *those two dyadic relations, it is not *composed *of
them in the sense that it is not built up from them nor reducible to them.
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:39 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> Ben, List:
>
> I share
name has three dots (also called "hooks" or "pegs" in other writings) to
which Peirce assigned those names in the subsequent text. Here is an image
of that handwritten sentence in R 670 (1911).
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structura
nt of theory, I am of opinion that we ought not to limit
ourselves to signs but ought to take account of certain objects more or
less analogous to signs. In practice, however, I have paid little attention
to these quasi-signs. (EP 2:257, 1903)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Stru
gt; Best regards,
>
> Cécile
>
> --
> *Cécile Cosculluela*
> MC anglais UPPA ∗ SSH ∗ LEA
> Maître de Conférences en Etudes Anglophones
> *Associate Professor of English as a Second Language*
> *Semiotics • Linguistics • Grammar • Translation*
&
und the
perimeter of the name of the relation itself. Hence, these two examples are
equivalent.
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri
*of the triadic
relation of *representing
*or (more generally) *mediating*. As such, it corresponds to one of the
three lines of identity in CP 1.347, while its object and interpretant
correspond to the other two.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist
egards,
Jon
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 1:45 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> Gary R., List:
>
> I did not say anything one way or the other about involution, I just
> explained why I used "determines." However, carefully parsing that quote
> (CP 5.72, EP 2:162, 1903),
at he says that for any
class in whose essential idea the predominant element is 3ns, there are
three subclasses--one involving a relatively genuine 3ns, one involving a
relatively reactional 3ns, and one involving a relatively qualitative 3ns.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structura
lowed by the two genera of
> degeneracy seem to me marked categorially: dynamic/"reactional" (2ns) and
> immediate/"qualitative"1ns) as are all the other elements in Peirce's
> classification as I read it. So why exclude the three interpretants from
> Peirce's classificat
Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at
https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at
https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll
ct, please see my recent *Semiotica *paper, "Peirce's Evolving
Interpretants" (https://philpapers.org/archive/SCHPEI-12.pdf).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitte
gin. (CP 6.582, 1890)
[image: image.png]
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:03 PM Mary Libertin
wrote:
> Jon,
>
> You
905) is an undivided whole from
which we prescind predicates, hypostasize some of those predicates into
subjects, and then attribute others to those subjects by formulating
propositions--namely, perceptual judgments, "the first premisses of all our
reasonings" (CP 5.116, EP 2:191, 1903).
Regards,
rful methods in logical analysis.
>
> BTW, the link provided did not work for me. Here is a similar one that
> did: https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.2023.a900117. Hat tip for the reference;
> it looks very interesting.
>
> Best, Mike
> On 10/5/2023 12:17 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt wro
tic] abstraction creates subjects. Both predicates and
subjects are creations of thought. (NEM 3:917, 1904)
A recent paper by Garzón-Rodríguez and Niño (
https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.59.1.04) similarly discusses the
continuity of cognition.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kans
id's Fifth Proposition (*Pons
Asinorum*) as an illustrative example. A book chapter that I recently
co-authored with Joseph Dauben and List moderator Gary Richmond, "Peirce on
Abduction and Diagrams in Mathematical Reasoning" (
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_25), might also pro
ive essence of theoric thought is. I
can at present say this much with some confidence. It is the directing of
the attention to a sort of object not explicitly referred to in the
enunciation of the problem in hand. (NEM 3:622, 1908)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural E
must be based on mathematical/probabilistic chance,
not metaphysical/absolute chance; so it is only useful for simulating "the
evolution of order in the early cosmos" to a limited degree, like the
"pseudo-continuum" of real numbers is useful for *approximating *a true
con
Names are creations of a second
order serving to render the representation of propositions possible. (R
295, 1906)
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Mon, J
the object. A pure index would denote its object without signifying
any interpretant, and the closest that we can come to such a sign is one
whose only effect is drawing attention to something else.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran
sed exclusively of signs" (CP 5.448n, EP
2:394, 1906)--which is precisely why it is intelligible at all. In short,
everything is, in itself, of the nature of a sign, and therefore cognizable.
Cheers,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran
an by "the interpretant/object generative
which is here proven" and "the structural premise of much 'interpretant
generation' in Peirce," but I hope that this is relevant and helpful.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lut
f deliberate conduct
accordingly.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:51 PM Helmut Raulien wrote:
> Jeffrey, List,
>
&g
minimum, they occupy different locations in space. Unless
they are sons of George Foreman, we can distinguish them by using their
proper names, which Peirce classified as rhematic indexical legisigns; or
if we happen to be with them in the same room, then we can do so simply by
pointing at them.
Than
sent. For both Kant and Peirce, metaphysics
depends on logic for principles, not the other way around.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Tue, Jun 6, 202
he science which
sets in order those observations which lie open to every man every day and
hour, experience can only mean the total cognitive result of living, and
includes interpretations quite as truly as it does the matter of sense" (CP
7.538, 1899).
Cheers,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Ol
*immediate *object), but it is precisely how an infinite
community *would *represent it after infinite inquiry.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sun, Jun 4,
've began drafting (not
> overly long as in the last essay-post and more conventional).
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Jack
>
> ----------
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 4, 2023 3:23 A
ey isn't
> "infinite community" but whether it is necessary to infer the existence of
> the thing in itself. For if this is necessary, then it matters not if the
> period of time be finite or infinite.
>
> And, again, I side with Peirce in the Welby exerpt. I believe it is
e *inquiry.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:04 PM JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY <
jack.cody.2...@mumail.ie> wrote:
> Jon, List,
>
&g
uot; (CP 6.95, 1903). By contrast, "Kant failed to work
out all the consequences of this third moment of thought and considerable
retractions are called for, accordingly, from some of the positions of his
Transcendental Dialectic" (ibid).
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structu
Jack, List:
Again, if the "thing in itself" can be inferred, then it can be represented
and is not incognizable after all. So, Peirce was right and Kant was wrong.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.Li
s with feedback
> given from various quarters, be inferred to exist via the formalisms I
> employ. That is, I claim here that I have proven the core part of Kant's
> thesis whilst my own does not necessarily have to stay within the Kantian
> limits but does, as you rightly point out, have
ait a long back and forth as to the entire structure and premis(ses) of
> the series/argument/conclusion (as such is necessary).
>
> I will fetch a summary and argument-treatment for you, though, - thanks
> again for offering to critique.
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> ---
these terms
seem to be central to your "proof" and thus need rigorous definitions for
how they are being used in this particular context.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / t
Jack, List:
Infinite, continuous, and recursive are not synonymous. Gödel's
incompleteness theorems pertain only to axiomatic formal systems of
mathematical logic. The term "value" is vague and still lacks a rigorous
definition for how it is being used in this particular context. No one is
the less effect it has
upon that quasi-mind other than that of determining it as if the object
itself had acted upon it. (EP 2:391, 1906)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.co
.html).
One last comment (for now)--Peirce's universal categories of 1ns, 2ns, and
3ns do not "belong to logic as semeiotic." On the contrary, as he
explicitly and repeatedly explains, they are discovered in phaneroscopy and
then applied in all the other positive sciences.
Regards,
Jon
ing *capable *of being represented, and so
far, your alleged "proof" does not come anywhere close to demonstrating
otherwise.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/Jon
nal, intelligible, conceivable, and utterly unlike a thing-in-itself.
(CP 5.553, EP 2:380)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:04 AM
ifestation (CP 1.615, EP 2:255, 1903)
Are there others?
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on &qu
List:
FYI, PhilPapers has apparently deleted the PDF of my slides at the link
that I provided below, so I have now posted it at
https://www.academia.edu/101052113/The_Basis_of_Synechism_in_Phaneroscopy
instead.
Thanks,
Jon
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 4:34 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> L
rupt beginning and end" (CP 1.274, 1902), like the
posited "Big Bang" and "Big Crunch" singularities. As Peirce points out,
the problem with such an approach is that these would be "arbitrary
exceptions not warranted by experience."
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt
inquiry to its ideal ending point. The same
> holds for the metaphysical hypothesis offered as an explanation of the
> cosmological evolution of the universe.
>
> Yours,
>
> Jeff
> ----------
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of Jo
by contraries. (CP 8.317, 1891)
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:10 PM Jeffrey Brian Downard <
peirce-l@list.iupui.edu> wrote
ongoing existential
embodiment of real generals, i.e., the conversion of indeterminate
conditional necessities into determinate individual actualities as the
contingent future is constantly becoming the accomplished past at the
nascent present.
Thanks again,
Jon
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:46 PM Jon
in detail, including its implications for time and cosmology,
in sections 6-7 of my "Temporal Synechism" paper. As I said before, our
reasoning/learning *about *the universe is recursive, but the *overall *process
of semiosis is hyperbolic--from the dynamical object through the sign
tow
9th-century European-American optimism
> that landed us in the Anthropocene!
>
> Love, gary
>
> Coming from the ancestral lands of the Anishinaabeg
>
> } Open your mouth, always be busy, and life is beyond hope. [*Daodejing*
> 52 (Feng/English)] {
>
> https://gnusyste
ntains that its
final state will be different from and better than its initial state. I am
in the process of transcribing the whole text and might gain some further
insights along the way.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christia
one but I did not have any luck with those links Jon.
>
> Dan
>
> On Apr 21, 2023, at 09:49, Jon Alan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> Martin, List:
>
> Indeed, I have argued in publications about structural engineering (
> https://www.structuremag.org/?p=10373) and cognitiv
alism" and "endism" in this context.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 8:34 PM Martin W. Kettelhut
wrote:
> Thank you, Jon.
st, nor third from second." This principle goes all the way back to
"A New List of Categories" (1867) and thus is Peirce 101, or at least
Phaneroscopy 101.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchm
ause (3ns),
instead of the all-too-common approach of *pushing* them toward it as an
*efficient* cause (2ns). This allows appropriate flexibility in the
*means *that they
can employ to reach the specified end, as opposed to dictating every step
along the way.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kans
hing would have been in the future. "The
absolutely last consequent" corresponds to "The 'Truth,' the fact that is
not abstracted but complete, [which] is the ultimate interpretant of every
sign" in KS, when the sheet would be filled up because everything would be
in the past.
Than
elmut fall within the subject matter of *this *thread, which is
specifically intended for further discussion about the "10-Minute Thesis
Initiative" session that the Charles S. Peirce Society conducted last
Saturday.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, S
action, are other
elements, without the independence of which Thirdness would not have
anything upon which to operate" (CP 6.202, 1898).
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAl
*time is an indefinite moment--what we are
always experiencing as the present--not a durationless instant, nor a
finite lapse.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchm
ook forward to a point in the
infinitely distant future when there will be no indeterminacy or chance but
a complete reign of law. But at any assignable date in the past, however
early, there was already some tendency toward uniformity; and at any
assignable date in the future there will be some slight aberra
especially perception.
Applying such continuity in semeiotic and metaphysics facilitates gaining a
better understanding of semiosis and objective idealism, leading to the
plausible hypothesis of the reality of God.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher
none)
or of denying if it be shaded or *oddly-enclosed*. It is a help to shade
the oddly-enclosed areas and omit the lines that represent the cuts ... (R
670:16-17[15-16], 1911)
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christ
until
October 2024. In other words, the three volumes are actually being
published as five books, three of which can now be purchased.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com
ntity that crosses an otherwise empty ring-shaped
area may be iterated or deiterated along with the blank.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
_ _ _ _ _ _
Just to clarify, since those of us in the United States are now observing
Daylight Savings Time rather than Standard Time, is this event starting
tomorrow at 3:30 PM EDT? At what time is it expected to end?
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher
relevant views (
https://erraticus.co/2022/11/28/truth-as-pragmatisms-only-hope/). As
always, I welcome anyone's feedback.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
er be confounded by any future experiences. In short, we strive to
conform all our *dynamical *interpretants of signs to their *final
*interpretants--with
varying degrees of success, because we remain fallible and indeed operate
with incomplete information.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe,
tence
(2ns).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 6:35 AM Helmut Raulien wrote:
> Jon, List,
>
> Altough I see your explanation,
ers and
laws of nature (for example) can be said to exist.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:06 PM Helmut Raulien wrote:
> Jon,
uot;*exist *in its strict philosophical
sense of 'react with the other like things in the environment'" (CP 6.495,
c. 1906), but they do "exist" in the *logical *sense of belonging to a
universe of discourse, namely, what Peirce calls the First Universe of
Experience (CP 6.455, EP 2:435, 1908).
of conduct to be recommended or in the general
habits that must result from experiences (including perceptions) to be
expected--not in those individual experiences (and perceptions) themselves,
nor in individual mental acts of expecting them.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural
Peirce needed for #4-5 was "a
> *Delta
> *part [of Existential Graphs] in order to deal with modals" (RL 376, R
> 500:2-3, 1911)--perhaps his 1909 Logic Notebook version using heavy lines
> to denote possible states of things, which I outlined in May (
> https://list.
ir
postmodern notion of each individual constructing his/her own reality is
utterly incompatible with the very definition of reality--often invoked by
Peirce--as that which is as it is regardless of what anyone thinks about it.
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, S
peratives, which is
presumably why Peirce proposed tinctures in 1906, but he abandoned them
along with cuts in favor of simple shading for negation in 1911. Is there a
viable alternative?
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Chri
l to follow his example and
ethics of terminology (CP 2.219-226, EP 2:263-266, 1903) by adopting one of
these distinctly philosophical alternatives.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitt
after it was written--at about the same time as William James's
book with the same name. Since it has obviously become quite familiar to me
by now, I am interested in finding out and then discussing what (if
anything) jumps out at others upon reading it, presumably for the very
first time.
Regards,
Jon
's entire
vast corpus of still-unpublished post-1892 writings available to those who
lack the patience to wade through the online manuscript images.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twit
,
the contrast between successive notes to 2ns, and the melody comprised of a
series of such notes to 3ns (CP 5.395, EP 1:128-129, 1878).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com
List:
My paper has now been published officially in *Semiotica*, volume 2022,
issue 246, pp. 211-223.
Regards,
Jon S.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 1:43 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> List:
>
> The subject line is the title of my paper that has just been published
> online by *Semio
between distinct facts that corresponds to a possibility, and
thereby serves as the additional convention enabling Delta EG to express a
strict implication that is and would be true of the AST and every PST, thus
representing a law.
Regards,
Jon S.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:36 PM Jon Alan S
oll with an LoC attached to
>the graphs in both closes vs. a scroll enclosed by a broken cut enclosed by
>a solid cut.
>- As Peirce shows with his last example, a single graph represents two
>propositions being possibly true individually but not together
>(incomp
en, perhaps Pollock's "basic" system should instead
be named P for him along with Parry, Peirce, and pragmaticism
Regards,
Jon S.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 7:49 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> List:
>
> In a recent post (
> https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2022-04
s://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2022-04/msg9.html).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 11:34 PM John F Sowa wrote:
> J
e many different
formal systems of modal logic is most appropriate for such reasoning.
Perhaps that will be a subject for another post.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twitter.com
ctual relation. It must reach, however vaguely, beyond this
> geological epoch, beyond all bounds. He who would not sacrifice his own
> soul to save the whole world, is, as it seems to me, illogical in all his
> inferences, collectively. Logic is rooted in the social principle.”Martin
&
G with
appropriate adjustments, but what about triadic logic? Thanks in advance
for sharing any thoughts about these questions that I have been pondering
recently.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/Jon
elded by the sign
itself, is the immediate interpretant that is *internal *to that sign. The
final interpretant is absent from this passage because it is the *telos *or
ideal aim of semiosis, and the phenomenon being discussed is a discrete
event prescinded from that continuous process.
Regards,
Jon Alan
ompletely under the domination of habit as to act with
almost perfect regularity & to have lost its powers of forgetting & of
learning" (R 936:3, no date).
GR: For the principle of what is the equivalent of created ur-continuity
reveals that nothing is truly independent of, if not lite
te as repugnant to scientific logic as to common sense" and rejects
it accordingly, despite acknowledging that there is much to be said for it.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.c
we are brought to the
more elevating theory of *idealism*" (R 936:3). "The one intelligible
theory of the universe is that of objective idealism, that matter is effete
mind, inveterate habits becoming physical laws" (CP 6.25, EP 1:293).
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas
that another
distinguishing feature of (degenerate) physicosemiosis is its *lack *of a
final interpretant, since it is entirely a matter of efficient causation
rather than involving final causation.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher
efficiently causes
S, and then S efficiently causes I, such that O causes I by causing S; for
example, when three billiard balls impact each other sequentially. However,
the interaction of the three correlates is reducible to those two
*dyadic *relations
rather than being a genuine *triadic *relation.
Regard
by the smoke. These admittedly mundane interpretants *do not* "depend
on a living entity" in Champagne's restrictive sense, and thus meet his
requirement to be legitimate instances of physicosemiosis
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philoso
hibit the development
of a comprehensive theory of interpretation in speculative rhetoric. It
seems to me that this would *only *be a danger if I were requiring all
dynamical interpretants to be further signs (3ns), but as outlined above,
my approach fully recognizes that they can be and often are exert
n trichotomies, which
together result in 66 classes of signs. Where I think we agree is that this
whole approach of classifying "individual" *signs *is less important than
studying the continuous process of *semiosis*. However, I believe that a
theory of interpretation--concerned with the relat
specific bearing do they have on the order of the last six trichotomies for
sign classification?
Thanks,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:28 AM
) or an
abducent (assurance of instinct) but cannot be a deducent (assurance of
form).
Again, this all generally makes sense to me, more so than any of the
alternatives.
Regards,
Jon S.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:33 PM Jon Alan Schmidt
wrote:
> Bernard, List:
>
> Thanks
up a norm, or standard which
ought to be conformed to.
Regards,
Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian
www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:25 PM Bernard Morand
wrote:
> JAS, Vinic
101 - 200 of 2002 matches
Mail list logo
