Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> >
> > rsync -avzCH --delete rsync.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs cvsroot/
> >
> >
> >
>
> The buildfarm howto has somewhat more complete instructions (including
> how to adjust the various cvs config files if you need to). I set it up
> the other day -
> "Warren" == Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Warren> Is it possible to obtain a mirror of the CVS repository?
I use CVSup to locally mirror the repo. They've had the repo
available via CVSup for some years now.
I use this .cvsup file:
,(/mirror/CvsUp/Postgresql/pgsql.cvsup)
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:50, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
You know, you can prune what is rsynced.
I am not sure why you brought this up, but yes I did know this.
Well I thought it might be useful to prune that directory you were
having trouble with. But we h
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you
>> don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines,
>> so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you
>> don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines,
>> so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 13:50, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> You know, you can prune what is rsynced.
I am not sure why you brought this up, but yes I did know this.
> my rsync line looks like this:
>
> rsync -avzCH --delete --exclude-from=/home/cvsmirror/pg-exclude
> anoncvs.postgresql.org::pgsq
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you
don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines,
so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works.
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 12:26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I definately had added the semicolons, so I am confused why you
> don't see them. Anyway, I have remove the duplicate 'creation:' lines,
> so now there is only one line in each file. Let me know how that works.
Everything looks good n
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Warren Turkal wrote:
> > > On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote:
> > > > head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v
> > > > head ? ?1.3;
> > > > access;
> > > > symbols
> > > > ? ? ? ? R
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Warren Turkal wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote:
> > > head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v
> > > head ? ?1.3;
> > > access;
> > > symbols
> > > ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1
> > > ? ? ? ? cr
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:57:03PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> >FWIW ClearCase also offers a command line version of its merge tool, where
> >it shows three columns (a la diff --side-by-side) and allows you to pick
> >which column you want to merge in (repo, change1, or c
On Monday 26 February 2007 14:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > FWIW ClearCase also offers a command line version of its merge tool,
> > where it shows three columns (a la diff --side-by-side) and allows you to
> > pick which column you want to merge in (repo, change1, or change2
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the
> early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found.
Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an
issue with re-c
Robert Treat wrote:
FWIW ClearCase also offers a command line version of its merge tool, where it
shows three columns (a la diff --side-by-side) and allows you to pick which
column you want to merge in (repo, change1, or change2 for example). It's a
nice attempt at doing it on the command li
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the
> >>> early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found.
> >> Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an
> >> issue with re-creating the SVN repo.
> >
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:04, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'll have to try kdiff3 - but the "merge" command, although it often
> > works, I strongly dislike when it marks up the lines as "there was a
> > conflict here" and gives you three files in the direc
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Done. Any other problems?
Only figuring out the encoding issues with cvs.
Thanks,
wt
--
Warren Turkal (w00t)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the
>>> early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found.
>> Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an
>> issue with re-creating the SVN repo.
>>
>> Joshua, do you run "trac-admin
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Done. Any other problems?
>
> I don't see the fix in the rsync archive. When will it show up there? For
About an hour.
> reference, the changes were needed in the following files in
> cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces
On Monday 26 February 2007 08:04, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Others you might want to try:
>
> - meld (in python, IMO worse than kdiff3)
> - xxdiff (I've never really used that one, but other monotone hackers
> seem to like it as well)
A couple more options:
* kompare (this one is pretty)
*
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Done. Any other problems?
I don't see the fix in the rsync archive. When will it show up there? For
reference, the changes were needed in the following files in
cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic:
* ApachePg.pl,v
* test.pl.newstyle,
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote:
> > head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v
> > head ? ?1.3;
> > access;
> > symbols
> > ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1
> > ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1.1
> > ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1; ? ?<<< What the heck happene
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote:
> > head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v
> > head ? ?1.3;
> > access;
> > symbols
> > ? ? ? ? Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1
> > ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1.1
> > ? ? ? ? creation:1.1.1; ? ?<<< What the heck happene
>> I imagine the problems are caused by manual mangling of the files in the
>> early days, like the perl5 dir stuff you found.
>
> Hmm, if you only checked using the Trac interface, maybe this is an
> issue with re-creating the SVN repo.
>
> Joshua, do you run "trac-admin /path/to/trac/env resyn
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have to try kdiff3 - but the "merge" command, although it often works,
I strongly dislike when it marks up the lines as "there was a conflict here"
and gives you three files in the directory to choose to start from. This is
far too manual, which invites mistakes
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:07:01AM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Yah know, the one bit of these pitches that always sounds like pure
> >snake oil is the claim that they offer some kind of mechanical solution
> >to merge conflicts. AFAICS that has nothing to do with the SCM
Hi,
Tom Lane wrote:
Yah know, the one bit of these pitches that always sounds like pure
snake oil is the claim that they offer some kind of mechanical solution
to merge conflicts. AFAICS that has nothing to do with the SCMS in use
and everything to do with whether your "diff" command is AI-comp
Hi,
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
I would say that a far greater contributor in practice would simply be
frequency. If you diverge on your significant feature for 6 months,
then try to merge in upstream changes from the main dev, you will be
in hell no matter what merge algorithm you use.
Do you h
Hi,
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
O.k. everyone pay attention, I am about to agree with Greg! ;)
Greg are their tools to migrate CVS to monotone or whatever your
favorite is? The reason I ask is that I migrate the CVS to SVN every 4
hours I think it is and it isn't perfect.
monotone ships it's own cv
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is
strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways.
Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my
convert
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:06:57PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Neil Conway, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> The ability to do history-sensitive merges actually results in a
> significant reduction in the need for manual conflict resolution.
I would say that a far greater contributor in practice would s
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 14:49 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> For example, currently if I have a patch and somebody reviews it and
> opines that I have to change foo to bar; then I resubmit the patch. How
> do they find out whether I actually changed foo to bar? Currently there
> are two alternative
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 18:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yah know, the one bit of these pitches that always sounds like pure
> snake oil is the claim that they offer some kind of mechanical solution
> to merge conflicts. AFAICS that has nothing to do with the SCMS in use
> and everything to do with wh
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:28:07AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:42:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100,
> > > > Markus Schilt
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:42:13 -0300, Alvaro
Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
alvherre> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
alvherre> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100,
Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
alvherre> >
alv
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus
Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
markus> Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on what
markus> replacement system to use". This has not much to do with the
markus> want or need (for lack of a better alt
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:42:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus
> > Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > markus> Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on w
On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:47, Chad Wagner wrote:
> head pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.oldstyle,v
> head 1.3;
> access;
> symbols
> Release-1-6-0:1.1.1.1
> creation:1.1.1.1
> creation:1.1.1; <<< What the heck happened here?
> locks; strict;
> comment @#
On 2/24/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know :-( I've tried to use the Trac site looking for particular
changesets and found that for some of them, the list of files are out of
sync with reality, and sometimes the diff don't have anything to do with
what the commit message
On 2/24/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in
'../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v'
>>> ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in
'../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/per
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is
> > strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways.
>
> Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my
> converted reposit
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Warren Turkal wrote:
>
>>> As a followup, the cvs2svn conversion says the following.
>>>
>>> Error summary:
>>> ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in
>>> '../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v'
On Saturday 24 February 2007 15:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Keep in mind that the repository as converted by Josh, above, is
> strangely corrupted in weird and unpredictable ways.
Would you care to elaborate on that statement? I'd like to check my converted
repositories for what you're referring
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Warren Turkal wrote:
> > As a followup, the cvs2svn conversion says the following.
> >
> > Error summary:
> > ERROR: Multiple definitions of the symbol 'creation' in
> > '../pgsql-cvs/cvsroot/pgsql/src/interfaces/perl5/Attic/test.pl.newstyle,v'
> > ERROR: Multiple defini
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
AFAIK, git still does not support windows properly[1], which I would say
is a killer... Unless you can of course to everything you need through
one of those frontend protocols, but if you can do everything that wa
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:24, Warren Turkal wrote:
>> The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a
>> SVN repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real
>> time to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I
On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:24, Warren Turkal wrote:
> The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a
> SVN repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real
> time to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would like to
> try conver
On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> AFAIK, git still does not support windows properly[1], which I would say
> is a killer... Unless you can of course to everything you need through
> one of those frontend protocols, but if you can do everything that way
> then why would yo
Jeremy Drake wrote:
rsync -avzCH --delete rsync.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs cvsroot/
The buildfarm howto has somewhat more complete instructions (including
how to adjust the various cvs config files if you need to). I set it up
the other day - took me about 10 minutes.
http://pgfoundry.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:32, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > Use cvsup, or if you don't want to go through the effort of getting that
> > set up, use rsync:
> >
> > rsync -avzCH --delete rsync.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs cvsroot/
>
> Thanks for this. Is thi
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 17:30, Gregory Stark wrote:
>> The distributed systems sound neat and do sound like they match our style
>> of working. But they seem like a big leap for a project that's still using
>> a buggy unmaintained pile of spaghetti code for fear of change.
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 21:23, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Are there any plans to move to another SCMS in the future? I am curious, I
> guess.
Is it possible to obtain a mirror of the CVS repository? The version of CVS on
the repository server is incompatible with cvsps (at least the version on
On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:32, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> Use cvsup, or if you don't want to go through the effort of getting that
> set up, use rsync:
>
> rsync -avzCH --delete rsync.postgresql.org::pgsql-cvs cvsroot/
Thanks for this. Is this documented somewhere that I should have looked?
wt
--
On Friday 23 February 2007 23:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> To be frank, I don't like Git's data model. Git has always seemed
> much too complex to use to me. I have more than enough with a single
> distributed SCM.
Have you ever tried cogito or any of the other apps for interacting with a git
re
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Warren Turkal wrote:
> The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a SVN
> repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real time
> to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would like to try
> converting the CVS r
On Friday 23 February 2007 12:03, Andrew Hammond wrote:
> While annoying, this is something that really only a problem for the
> CVS maintainer (and anyone who's stuck waiting for the maintainer to
> shuffle stuff). I suggest that while it would be nice to solve this
> problem, it's more of a bonus
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:30, Gregory Stark wrote:
> The distributed systems sound neat and do sound like they match our style
> of working. But they seem like a big leap for a project that's still using
> a buggy unmaintained pile of spaghetti code for fear of change. Subversion
> is the path
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 08:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Sorry, I mean Windows. We're taken pains to ensure Postgres runs on
> > Windows, we're not going to abandon that platform now.
>
> This is why I would propose the use of the CVS gateway on top of git. Also,
> Wiki
On Friday 23 February 2007 08:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Sorry, I mean Windows. We're taken pains to ensure Postgres runs on
> Windows, we're not going to abandon that platform now.
This is why I would propose the use of the CVS gateway on top of git. Also,
Wikipedia claims there is a MingW32 p
Gregory Stark wrote:
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I note also that CVS does have the ability to merge changes across
branches, we just choose not to use it that way.
And the reason why, I assume, is because it's hard to grant access to CVS
without granting access to do anythi
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, it's nice. Consider this: Andrew develops some changes to PL/perl
>> in his branch. Neil doesn't like something in those changes, so he
>> commits a fix there. In the meantime, Tom has been busy with hi
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:24:29PM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 15:50, you wrote:
> > How to people get a branch? Do they have their own logins?
>
> If monotone is something like Git, you just create it in your local working
> copy and push is somewhere public when yo
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Yes, it's nice. Consider this: Andrew develops some changes to PL/perl
> in his branch. Neil doesn't like something in those changes, so he
> commits a fix there.
If I understand right, another advantage is that the SCM will keep
track of which of those changes came fr
On Friday 23 February 2007 00:55, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Anyone who followed the thread willing to list the mentioned
> requirements as well as the pro's and con's of the differnent options in
> the developer wiki [1]?
Does the dev wiki even have a link from the site? I can't find a link under
* Bruce Momjian:
>> The fact that you're still thinking in "patch application" means you're
>> still stuck in the CVS worldview. To "apply a patch" in a distributed
>> SCM(*) really means to merge a branch into the main development branch.
>> Of course, you can still see the entire "diff -c" if y
On Friday 23 February 2007 15:50, you wrote:
> How to people get a branch? Do they have their own logins?
If monotone is something like Git, you just create it in your local working
copy and push is somewhere public when you are ready, or you can just
generate the changeset and submit that.
wt
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it's nice. Consider this: Andrew develops some changes to PL/perl
> in his branch. Neil doesn't like something in those changes, so he
> commits a fix there. In the meantime, Tom has been busy with his own
> stuff and committing to the main branc
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > My typical cycle is to take the patch, apply it to my tree, then cvs
> > diff and look at the diff, adjust the source, and rerun until I like the
> > diff and apply. How do I do that with this setup?
>
> The same, except that you don't need to t
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> My typical cycle is to take the patch, apply it to my tree, then cvs
> diff and look at the diff, adjust the source, and rerun until I like the
> diff and apply. How do I do that with this setup?
The same, except that you don't need to take the patch out of an email
and in
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> My typical cycle is to take the patch, apply it to my tree, then cvs
> diff and look at the diff, adjust the source, and rerun until I like the
> diff and apply. How do I do that with this setup?
The most similar to what you're doing would be to
merge the patch's branch
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Gregory Stark wrote:
> > > > > You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without
> > > > > any of the
> > > > > tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Gregory Stark wrote:
> > > > You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any
> > > > of the
> > > > tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the
> > > > logs
> > > > of t
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> > > You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any
> > > of the
> > > tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the
> > > logs
> > > of the branch, merge the branch into the
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any of
> > the
> > tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the logs
> > of the branch, merge the branch into the code automatically taking into
> > accoun
Gregory Stark wrote:
> You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any of the
> tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the logs
> of the branch, merge the branch into the code automatically taking into
> account the known common ancestor. Instead
On Feb 22, 9:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > It's also fair to say that this is a subject about which we usually get
> > much more noise from partisans of other SCM systems than from the
> > relatively small number of people who actually have to maintain
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:32:34AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I am happy to help with this any way I can, because I would love to see
> CVS take a big diving leap off the backend of mysql into the truncated
> data set of hell.
That quote made the whole argument coming up again worthwhile. :)
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Moreover work on things like bitmapped indexes that other people want to help
on is hampered by this need to be mailing around patches. If two or three
people submit changes (based possibly on different old versions of the patch)
the main developer has to merge them into hi
> Moreover work on things like bitmapped indexes that other people want to help
> on is hampered by this need to be mailing around patches. If two or three
> people submit changes (based possibly on different old versions of the patch)
> the main developer has to merge them into his version of the
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 20:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Git is also pretty cool, too. You can even present a CVS interface on a
> > > git repository. That might address the build farm issue.
> >
> > But it wasn't portable, last time I checked.
>
> Git is in the FreeB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:42:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus
> > > Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > markus> Uh, yah. But I was r
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus
> Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> markus> Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on what
> markus> replacement system to use". This has not much to do with the
Hey,
Anyone who followed the thread willing to list the mentioned
requirements as well as the pro's and con's of the differnent options in
the developer wiki [1]? I think this would help a lot in making a
decision and it could be a lot of help for other OSS projects
considering to switch.
I
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 21:23, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Are there any plans to move to another SCMS in the future? I am curious, I
> guess.
Speaking of which...Are there any plans to upgrade the CVS server to the
latest version?
wt
--
Warren Turkal (w00t)
---(end of
Hi,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:38:26 +0100, Markus
Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
markus> > So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of
markus> > opinions on what replacement system to use, a bit carelessly
marku
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [much snipped]
>> Why are so few people committers?
>> ...
>> The answer to both questions is because CVS limitations make it hard to do
>> better.
>
> Uh, no. The reason there are so few committers is that ther
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [much snipped]
> Why are so few people committers?
> ...
> The answer to both questions is because CVS limitations make it hard to do
> better.
Uh, no. The reason there are so few committers is that there are so few
people qualified not to break things.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 20:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Git is also pretty cool, too. You can even present a CVS interface on a
> > git repository. That might address the build farm issue.
>
> But it wasn't portable, last time I checked.
Git is in the FreeBSD ports. The cvs gateway server co
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
1. It has an api that can be written to, that may or may not be helpful
to buildfarm.
2. It has mindshare. I know that isn't a big deal to a lot of people
here, but the it is becoming
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > 1. It has an api that can be written to, that may or may not be helpful
> > to buildfarm.
> >
> > 2. It has mindshare. I know that isn't a big deal to a lot of people
> > here, but the it is becoming the new cvs.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 1. It has an api that can be written to, that may or may not be helpful
> to buildfarm.
>
> 2. It has mindshare. I know that isn't a big deal to a lot of people
> here, but the it is becoming the new cvs. There are others of course
> (lik
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:13:49PM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> one sparc (osol). So far all gcc compiled, AFAIK.
I think, that buildbot was gcc on solaris9/sparc. I care for support of
monotone built with sunpro on solaris10
(and opensolaris) on x86 and sparc (but no buildbot for those).
If I may, I'll add a few words to this discussion:
Basically, I'm seeing that three things need to be decided upon:
1. Do you want to stay with CVS or do you want to move to something
else?
2. If you want to move, when? Is now a good time, or is it better
to look at it another time
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:38:26 +0100, Markus
Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
markus> > So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of
markus> > opinions on what replacement system to use, a bit carelessly
markus> > before having answered the above questi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:09:48 -0800, "Joshua D.
Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jd> I believe that is much more accurate. The reality is, switching to
jd> something else will be painful. I would prefer not to be on CVS as
jd> well but it would take a lot of work and
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2. Many people (and some buildfarm members) operate against mirrors of the
> > main
> > repo which are created with rsync or CVSup. I am not aware of any way to do
> > the
> > equivalent with SVN - any info would be grate
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
[...]
> It's also the easiest to get ahold of. Easier I would say than CVS which you
> have to download some bug fixes from various unofficial sites to get a good
> working version of.
just to mention it - the openbsd gyus are
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to stay with CVS. Only some
> desperate souls including myself are fiddling with other VCSes.
I think if you took a head count, a majority of developers would
probably want to switch, but I doubt that there would be a consensu
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Warren Turkal wrote:
>> On Thursday 22 February 2007 05:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Many people (and some buildfarm members) operate against mirrors of
>>> the main repo which are created with rsync or CVSup. I am not aware of
>>> any way to do the equivalent with
Warren Turkal wrote:
On Thursday 22 February 2007 05:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
2. Many people (and some buildfarm members) operate against mirrors of
the main repo which are created with rsync or CVSup. I am not aware of
any way to do the equivalent with SVN - any info would be gratefully
re
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
