Tomas Hlavaty writes:
Hi Tomas,
>
>> When using slime, should the inferior buffer a *inferior-lisp* or
>> rather a *inferior-picolisp* buffer? I guess, the *inferior-lisp*
>> buffer should be fine ...
>
> It is *inferior-lisp* and the repl is called *slime-repl picolisp*.
> They are numbered if
Tomas Hlavaty writes:
Hi Tomas,
>
>> so thats the solution - I have a local installation, I set the 4 links
>> to /usr/bin/ and /usr/share/ as described in INSTALL - but apparently
>> only /usr/share/picolisp is the one that works. I have no idea why.
>
> how did you install your local picolisp?
Tomas Hlavaty writes:
Hi Tomas,
>> swank-picolisp and copied your configuration except the picolisp command
>>
>> ,---
>> | usr/bin/picolisp/p
>> `---
>>
>> I have a problem there, I tried
>>
>> ,
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil
Hi Thorsten,
> When using slime, should the inferior buffer a *inferior-lisp* or
> rather a *inferior-picolisp* buffer? I guess, the *inferior-lisp*
> buffer should be fine ...
It is *inferior-lisp* and the repl is called *slime-repl picolisp*.
They are numbered if you are connecting to multiple
Hi Thorsten,
> so thats the solution - I have a local installation, I set the 4 links
> to /usr/bin/ and /usr/share/ as described in INSTALL - but apparently
> only /usr/share/picolisp is the one that works. I have no idea why.
how did you install your local picolisp? Did you "cd src; make"? C
Hi Thorsten,
> swank-picolisp and copied your configuration except the picolisp command
>
> ,---
> | usr/bin/picolisp/p
> `---
>
> I have a problem there, I tried
>
> ,
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil |
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
> What happens if you execute it in the shell
>
>$ /home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil
,
| tj1@tj-desktop:~$ /home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil
| bash: /home/tj1/bin/picolisp/
Hi Thorsten,
> > I think this error occurs because the binary 'picolisp' cannot be found.
>
> strange, I changed $PATH and emacs exec-path:
As far as the 'picolisp' executable is concerned, the $PATH doesn't
matter at all. All that counts is how it is invoked by the scripts.
About emacs exec-pat
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
>> I have a problem there, I tried
>>
>> ,
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil |
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/plmod |
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin/pil |
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin/plmod |
>> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin
Hi Thorsten,
> I have a problem there, I tried
>
> ,
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/pil |
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/plmod |
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin/pil |
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin/plmod |
> | home/tj1/bin/picolisp/bin/psh
Tomas Hlavaty writes:
Hi Henrik, Hi Tomas,
thanks for your help so far.
I now have slime and sbcl installed and working, and I downloaded
swank-picolisp and copied your configuration except the picolisp command
,---
| usr/bin/picolisp/p
`---
I have a problem t
Hi Thorsten,
> ,-
> | visit-tags-table-buffer:
> | File /home/tj1/bin/picoLisp/src64/tags is not a valid tags table
> `-
>
> Is t
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> I think that the necessary tags are already there, or can be easily
> I'm assuming that emacs can use the 'vi' tag file format. Am I wrong?
I'm afraid not, I used
,---
1.) Lisp level functions are handled anyway by the jump to documentation script.
2.) It's only a problem when jumping as you then jump to the incorrect
file but since I don't do much global functions anyway this is not a
problem for me, if I jump to http for instance I end up in the right
file.
3.)
Hi Thorsten,
> So you use the same commands/keybindings for all those different lisp
> dialects?
I do, but you can customize that if you wish.
> Didn't know that there is a R backend for slime/swank.
http://common-lisp.net/~crhodes/swankr/
Cheers,
Tomas
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@softwa
Hi Henrik,
> Not much to it, I do things "old school" ie I put the download in
> /opt/picolisp and simply cd there in a shell and do: ctags -e -R
> --languages=-JavaScript,-PHP,-C,-Make,-HTML
>
> This will recursively loop through all the folders and generate tags
> for everything, for instance a
It's at the end here:
http://www.prodevtips.com/2010/09/29/emacs-color-themes-tags-cedet-ecb-and-other-customizations/
Not much to it, I do things "old school" ie I put the download in
/opt/picolisp and simply cd there in a shell and do: ctags -e -R
--languages=-JavaScript,-PHP,-C,-Make,-HTML
Thi
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> I think that the necessary tags are already there, or can be easily
>
> I'm assuming that emacs can use the 'vi' tag file format. Am I wrong?
I must admit I'm a bit overwhelmed by all the new
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
> I think that the necessary tags are already there, or can be easily
I'm assuming that emacs can use the 'vi' tag file format. Am I wrong?
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Henrik, Thorsten,
> > Because with the help of CTags I can jump to any defined function or
> > method in a .l file.
>
> I tried it once to set up TAG files, but I didn't really succeed. I think
> I have to read a bit more in the Emacs manual and then try your tutorial
> again. TAGS seem to be
Tomas Hlavaty writes:
Hi Tomas,
>> Thats quite impressive, thanks. I thought slime/swank is only for
>> communication with compiled lisps, but well ...
>
> slime/swank is a client/server protocol. There are backends e.g. for
> Common Lisp, Scheme, Clojure, R, Picolisp and probably more. It is
Henrik Sarvell
writes:
Hi Henrik,
> Does it matter if you can see the definition instead of simply jumping
> to it?
not really.
> Because with the help of CTags I can jump to any defined function or
> method in a .l file.
I tried it once to set up TAG files, but I didn't really succeed. I thi
Hi Thorsten,
> Thats quite impressive, thanks. I thought slime/swank is only for
> communication with compiled lisps, but well ...
slime/swank is a client/server protocol. There are backends e.g. for
Common Lisp, Scheme, Clojure, R, Picolisp and probably more. It is not
difficult to write a new
Hi Thorsten,
> don't post that output again since it was quite 'toxic' the last time
> - all my mails turned blue in emacs-gnus (due to unprintable
> characters?) and I had to restart gnus.
ha, I wondered why everything turned blue;-)
Tomas
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subje
Does it matter if you can see the definition instead of simply jumping to it?
Because with the help of CTags I can jump to any defined function or
method in a .l file.
With jump to documentation you basically get this functionality for
the built in functions.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:44 AM, T
Tomas Hlavaty writes:
> Hi Tomas,
>
>> I remember that Alex recently mentioned a method how to get the
>> signature of any function or method definition loaded in the system.
>> Unfortunately, I could not find the related post again.
>>
>> Any hints where I have to look would be appreciated.
>
>
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
>
>> > Perhaps the output mode (console cooked vs. raw) is not right? Does it
>> > behave correctly if you start it - without emacs - just from the shell
>> >
>> >$ pil +
>> >
>> > in the default way?
>>
>> picolisp does work from the shell - but not 'doc:
Hi Thorsten,
> > Perhaps the output mode (console cooked vs. raw) is not right? Does it
> > behave correctly if you start it - without emacs - just from the shell
> >
> >$ pil +
> >
> > in the default way?
>
> picolisp does work from the shell - but not 'doc:
>
> ,---
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
> Perhaps the output mode (console cooked vs. raw) is not right? Does it
> behave correctly if you start it - without emacs - just from the shell
>
>$ pil +
>
> in the default way?
picolisp does work from the shell - but not 'doc:
,
Hi Thorsten,
> I remember that Alex recently mentioned a method how to get the
> signature of any function or method definition loaded in the system.
> Unfortunately, I could not find the related post again.
>
> Any hints where I have to look would be appreciated.
have a look at
$ git clone
Hi Thorsten,
> > By default, 'doc' simply calls the 'w3m' browser (if neither a browser
> > is in the environment variable BROWSER, nor one was passed as a second
> > argument to 'doc').
>
> I do use w3m and w3m-mode for emacs, and now I exported a new
> environment variable BROWSER=w3m - and w3m
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
>> > by looking at it with an editor (sorry, only 'vim' at the moment),
>> >
>> >: (vi 'insert)
>>
>> that was another question of mine - what would it take to get a
>>
>> ,
>> | (emacs 'insert)
>> `
>>
>> function, and a
Hi Thorsten,
> > by looking at it with an editor (sorry, only 'vim' at the moment),
> >
> >: (vi 'insert)
>
> that was another question of mine - what would it take to get a
>
> ,
> | (emacs 'insert)
> `
>
> function, and a
>
> ,---
> | (edit 'i
Alexander Burger writes:
Hi Alex,
>> I remember that Alex recently mentioned a method how to get the
>> signature of any function or method definition loaded in the system.
>
> I'm not completely sure what you mean with signature in this context.
>
>
> You can inspect a function by pretty-printi
Henrik Sarvell
writes:
> I don't know if this is exactly what you want but (all) can be used to
> inspect stuff, an example of getting all loaded classes:
>
> (de getClasses ()
>
> (filter
> '((S)
> (and
> (= `(char "+") (char S))
> (type S)))
> (all))
Hi Thorsten,
> I remember that Alex recently mentioned a method how to get the
> signature of any function or method definition loaded in the system.
I'm not completely sure what you mean with signature in this context.
You can inspect a function by pretty-printing,
: (pp 'insert)
(de in
I don't know if this is exactly what you want but (all) can be used to
inspect stuff, an example of getting all loaded classes:
(de getClasses ()
(filter
'((S)
(and
(= `(char "+") (char S))
(type S)))
(all)))
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Thorsten
37 matches
Mail list logo
