The answer is simple. Create your own footprint for the vertically mounted TO-220 part.
-Original Message-
>From: Peter Moreton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I'm trying to create my first PCB with Protel 99SE, and having a
>difficulty with a TO220 voltage regulator. The footprint (TO-220)
>re
BTW, some of you might also want to download this
http://www.intel.com/support/processors/pentiumiii/psover.htm
On 07:46 PM 1/15/2003 -0500, Andrew Jenkins wrote:
>On 11:01 AM 1/13/2003 -0600, Brad Velander wrote:
> >Andrew,
> > I was not advocating "dumbing down&
On 11:01 AM 1/13/2003 -0600, Brad Velander wrote:
>Andrew,
> I was not advocating "dumbing down"
Chill, didn't mean any harm. Try this. It might be something of value...
http://support.intel.com/support/processors/tools/frequencyid/freqid.htm
r,
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
It's at your end Jami. Probably a glitch in some new anti-viral scanner your MIS team
came up with. nada (no duplicates) here or at work.
On 12:25 PM 12/20/2002 -0800, JaMi Smith wrote:
>Brad,
>
>Thanks for the response.
>
>It will be interesting to see if you get anything.
>
>I have just receive
On 09:24 AM 12/14/2002 -0800, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
>what about the infamous runaway panning problem ?
>
>is that finally nailed in DXP?
I would hold out on any evaluation of this particular feature until some time has
passed. As evidenced by the nearly half dozen previous attempts that Protel
Ah...
Thanks for the explanation. Now that you mention it, I do remember something from a
thread or two on that very subject.
aj
On 10:41 PM 12/15/2002 +, Terry Harris wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:40:17 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Just for curiosity's sake, do you know how OrCad ports got
> >
On 04:22 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, John Branthoover wrote:
>I'm A Fool!!!,
> That was it. I thought that I had did a good look around for
>something that was turned on that was not suppose to be. I guess that I
>didn't. Thank you for setting me straight. Now mabe I can get some
>work around he
Well, I'm not exactly sure, but I think I'm glad to have been of some help.
Makes a watchdog feel all warm and fuzzy...
On 04:15 PM 12/15/2002 -0500, John Branthoover wrote:
>I'm A Fool!!!,
>
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/15/02 10:51 AM >>>
>...the only reference I came up with indicates that you _
John,
I did a quick check of the PEDA messages in my personal archive, and the only
reference I came up with indicates that you _may_ have inadvertently changed the port
type to ORCAD ports. Check and see if that is your problem. Other than that, I can't
really comment, as I've not seen the pro
Not sure that "formal" instructions are really necessary. My own informal isntructions
might go something like this:
1. Bend leads just past neckdown to 90 degrees.
2. apply heatsink compound to screw tab (underside of TO-220)
3. Insert component.
4. Solder component.
5. Attach using screw/nut
J
All,
When I "grab" an entity within the P99SE Schematic editor, specifically one such as a
wire or wire-end, I have a difficult time actually attaching my cursor to the entity,
unless I have magnified the local area to an often unacceptable zoom level.
For clarity's sake, suppose you have a sc
On 05:32 PM 12/3/2002 -0800, JaMi Smith wrote:
>AJ,
>
>Not sure that anyone ever replied to this one.
Nope. Thanks for the reply. Yes, it would be nice if there was such a beast, but I
have a feeling that there isn't.
The reason I was interested is probably pretty obvious, but if not, it's simp
Received same. now is deletia. AFAIK, the PEDA server filters out attachments, so it
must have been a direct attack.
Rick be warned, Your system appears to be infected.
aj
On 01:23 PM 11/29/2002 -0500, Phillip Stevens wrote:
>---Phil
>
>
>My e-mail program just quarantined an e-mail (It ident
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Now that I know of the P L command, I went into the PCB
> library editor to
> create a component and the P L command does not exist!
There are no "lines" in the PCB editor. They're all polylines, or, in Protel
nomencl
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> It's freeware for 15 or 30 days, right?
According to the author, "it has no timebomb", therefore, it should not be
time-limited. I highly doubt that the authopr intends this product as
freeware, but instead I do get the feeling that he has re
> From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Wasn't AutoTrax the predecessor to Protel?
Yes. I was surprised to see that the name was being used. 'Suppose someone
will make issue. Didn't want to be the one. My understanding is that the
original code had been sold to a third party
> From: Mike Ingle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I purchased Auto-Trax from Protel along with The initial
> windows schematic
> software. Way back when they were in Santa Clara Ca.
Protel has always been an Aussie company, though they did have a
sales/support group here in the states.
aj
***
> From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> The guys who made this web site should convert their screen
> shot .BMPs to .PNGs. I gave up after the first page in the
> "viewing" of
> their online manuals.
>
> Looks really cheap...
At $195, that's an understatment...
aj
*
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I use 1/5 of
> the Protel tool
> set but paid for all of itI don't want their
> autorouter, their
> PLD tools etc. So why should I have to pay for them? Most
> likely, I will
> have to pay for the f
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Gilley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> At 04:45 PM 8/15/2002 -0400, Matt Daggett wrote:
> >Also if anyone is thinking about installing Win2K SP3 better
> real the EULA
> >very closely. I basically gives Bill the ability to
> remotely install/remove
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Danny Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>...
> I wonder what conclusion we can draw from any potential
> benefits of using a thick trace for a tricky trace, but
> thinning it down when required to get through tight
> spots?
I suppose that might depend on how
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> On 08:57 AM 1/08/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins said:
>
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> AFAIR, 99SE was to first to have servicepacks.
> 2.8 was halfway working, the next year came 3.0.
> The next year came 98, the next year came 99, then came
> 99SE and then the servicepacks. And I paid for ever
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Reagan (EDSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> I don't think any of us can complain that Protel went the
> extra mile and
> offered SP5 and SP6 free.
Offered for free? How very nice. I feel really warm and fuzzy
IMO, "offer for free", or any other t
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:59 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Re[2]: Not DXP or P99SE, but have you seen the
> Cadence offer
>
>
> Get ready to bend over for the maintenance fees on $26,000
> -Original Message-
> From: Rene Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> You're wrong. The NDA applies for afterwards too.
> The NDA covers the NDA too, I guess.
> The beta was a lot of tiring work, so let's forget about
> the beta and focus on the release.
>
> You do your
> purch
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> As far as the Zoom issue. It was obviously a design decision.
> As such with user
> interface decisions, some people will like it, and some
> won't. If the majority
> find the decision useable and can adapt to i
> -Original Message-
> From: Schmitt Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Hey Folks ...
>
> One uppon a time there was a Protel Eda Users Forum that was
> a goof adress
> for Protel related questions and answers where tip and tricks were
> discussed.
Mr Schmitt would like to offer his w
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Ingle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:53 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Fastest possible Protel system, price is not a
> concern.
>
>
> I would guess that your money on Protel would go the furthest
> with a low
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Sherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Not quite.We provide a service, not manufacture a product. Our
> clients set the target product functionality, and specify performance.
> If the computer trade were based on a service model, I'm sure we'd
> hav
On 11:45 AM 7/5/2002 -0400, Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
>Buy this new cell phone - it has downloadable ring tunes and 3 new
>interchangeable case colors! Woo hoo!
>Buy this new car - it has state-of-the-art LED taillights and is all new for
>this model year! Woo hoo!
>Buy this new TV - it has
On 11:30 AM 7/3/2002 +1000, Ian Wilson wrote:
>On 10:27 AM 2/07/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins said:
>
>>Studies have shown time and time again that a pair of XMhz processors will
>>out-perform a single 1.5X processor in most real-world tasking environments.
>
>Andrew,
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Bagotronix Tech Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I actually have been wondering for years where all the CPU
> cycles go. Each
> successive generation of software runs slower and slower...
Well, At the risk of upsetting our rich, oak-lined brethren, th
> -Original Message-
> From: mike ingle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:08 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] Anyone know of a Altera listserver? and
> Single/Dual CPU
>
>
> Compilation timess are getting too slow on my pokey old 1Ghz
> Athalon ;)
> I
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Sherer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:03 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: [PEDA] Protel / MSoft
>
>
> My personal reservation to Altium's new pricing structure is that
> both Microsoft and Protel have historically used
> -Original Message-
> From: Darryl Newberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: [PEDA] how to expend DIGEST mode
>
>
> I switched my list prefs to DIGEST mode, but was annoyed to
> discover that
> the "digest" is a hie
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:09 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 3D VIEW USING RADEON7000
>
>
> Not at all. However, if Protel is using an aspect of OpenGL
> that is not
> common or often correctly
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Creer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:32 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Autopan in PCB (99SE)
>
>
> Hmmm, I think you had a bit more success than I, Tom. No go
> unfortunately.
> Strange, it didn't do it
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> OK GREAT!
>
> Can ANYBODY recommend a card that has dual screen capability
> AND a PROPER OpenGL implemetation?
Exactly what does OpenGL have to do with proper performance of Protel?
aj
* * * * * * * * * * *
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> i had terrible problems with a generic geforce2 card using
> the supplied
> drivers with rats nest lines not disapearing when moving and
> the 3d display
> taking 3 mins to update on a simple board. However, after
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Uijtenhaak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:54 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 1.5 PCB Lib to Protel 99SE PCB Lib
>
>
> Suresh,
>
> I just managed to import an old AUTOTRAX library (last update
> in 1994) i
>I don't understand your comment. I didn't ask any questions
>to have answered.
>You said: "...Just what might have happened to you..." Nothing happened to
me.
It was a "clever" attempt at a dig. See. Nyah...See?
aj1
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a messag
On 09:08 PM 4/23/2002 -0400, Andrew Jenkins wrote like an idiot about plating:
I hate when I don't think...Too much coffee, too little sleep, and, well...I'll just
shut up now...
Skip the flames, I'm already flogging myself.
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On 08:08 PM 3/22/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
>That's a good question. I would bet Protel has something that reads DDBs and
>puts all the files in a directory. Maybe someone there would like to chime
>in???
As I remember from the early description of Phoenix's expected file storage systems,
Hi,
Just received an unsolicited advertisement (IMO spam) for PCB services from the
subj-title address. No reason, as I can see, expect for my inclusion into this group.
Curious, and concerned that another spammer is trying to use information gathered by
subscription into this group for spammi
On 01:40 PM 2/25/2002 -0500, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>At 10:00 AM 2/25/2002 +0100, Edi Im Hof wrote:
>
>>As far as I know, it's legally to downgrade. That means buy XP and install W2000.
>
>Where does Mr. Im Hof get that idea? If Microsoft allows it in the XP license, yes,
>of course it would
On 03:47 PM 2/20/2002 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote:
>How do others interpret the following terms?
>PCB (printed circuit board)
Printed circuit board, ie, FR4 or other base material(s), etched and/or plated with a
very thin layer of metal to form an electrical circuit. Specifically, one that has
alr
On 11:58 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote:
>Matt Pobursky wrote:
>>I'm wondering if Nvidia has cracked the Win2K dual monitor/dual
>>resolution thing or if it just works with Win9x/WinXP (like
>>everyone else but Matrox). I've got a Geforce2 GTS card with dual
>>head outputs I'd love t
Hey,
For those of you who, like me, were pleasantly surprised by Tony Karavidas's post on
the subject of NView, (and the long awaited dual-resolution feature) check with your
video card company for the latest drivers. NView is now available for download (at
least from Evga). Here, I assume tha
On 09:25 AM 2/12/2002 -0500, Narinder Kumar wrote:
>Is this 1986 or 1886.
>
>I was using Protel Dos previous to Autotrax and Easytrax. In 1990 I
>purchased Easytrax.
'86...a typo. Was that easytrax or Autotrax that you purchased? Easytrax was always,
TTBOMK, free.
aj
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
On 04:19 PM 2/8/2002 -0500, Michael Reagan wrote:
>yea yea yea Acel was so damn good they went out of business. Dont get my
>going slamming bit mapped crayola like Accel.
Well...not exactly. And obviously, the program had enough of a value that Protel
purchased the company, and appears to have
On 05:09 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Mr Lomax,
>I don't believe that I missed your point at all, I just don't agree. There
>is no such thing as a "simple" 3D model. If all you want is simple height,
>you might want to follow Robi's advice and calculate the separations with a
>penc
On 01:56 PM 2/7/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>"Many users will not want to have to convert all their libraries to include
>3-D information"
>This is my point exactly. Some PCB designers have no interest in the 3D
>world, so let's not create a proverbial white elephant inside of Protel.
On 01:17 AM 1/26/2002 +1100, Graeme Zimmer wrote:
>Hi,
>
> > I have run second P99SE processes all the time, same for P98 and
> > combinations of P98/P99SE/V2.8. Has never caused a crash yet, using either
> > NT4 or now W2K.
>
>All our machines run Win2K with oodles of resources.
>
>Running more
On 10:53 PM 12/3/2001 +0100, Christoph Brudy wrote:
>Hello,
>can somebody recommend a way to handle components that I want to appear
>in the schematic, but are not mounted on the PCB (e.g. switches, lamps,
>fuses ...).
For moderately complex system designs, I have generally created at least one s
On 09:13 PM 11/21/2001 +1000, Don Ingram wrote:
>We vowed to stick with M$ to save having to deal with 'yet more different
>software' but since our experience with dealing with Win2K server and M$'s
>new direction in licensing we decided to have a look at Linux.
I think that readers may be confus
On 04:59 PM 11/20/2001 -0800, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
>according to Brian Livingston ("Window Manager" columnist from InfoWorld
>who recommends against using XP) the hardware detection/protection is by
>design very weak
>
>he suggests that there will be hacks freely available shortly to defeat
>th
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
