Server 10.6 on the new server, and SQLite seems to
have more built-in Python support than the other databases on that
platform. How would I do the dump/import? (Or at least where are the
relevant files?)
Ian
On Jul 19, 12:05 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
I would
Oh, OK, I'll use the MySQL db option then, thanks! Presumably the
only database I need to transfer with mysqldump is the one named after
my Review Board site (reviewboard in my case)?
Ian
On Jul 20, 12:49 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
SQLite should never really be used
doing a search fails, I get a 500 error and
this message emailed to me. Any ideas? Is 2.9.3 too new of a version
of PyLucene?
Ian
ERROR:root:Exception thrown for user admin at
http://mailx.apple.com/codereviews/r/search/?q=test
Documentstored/uncompressed,omitNormsid:1470
Traceback (most recent
PyLucene 2.4.1-2 looks to be the latest version before 2.9.x. I got
that installed and search is working great now; thanks!
Ian
On Jul 25, 6:20 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Yeah, the 2.9.x (which is a pre-release for 3.0) is incompatible. The
previous series before
Anyone have any ideas on this one? Would (|(uid=%s)(cn=%s)) do it
possibly? I would think that would just make it find users with
either attribute which it's already doing.
Ian
On Jul 24, 12:42 am, Ian email@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using LDAP authentication with these settings which point
Hi guys,
I see a number of people have had this issue but none of their
resolutions have helped me so I post again.
I have installed everything on Windows following the instructions and
all I see when I browse the site is Manual server updates required
and underneath that Install GNU patch.exe.
/2010/08/24/code-review-goodness-with-review...
).
Tim
-Original Message-
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ian
Sent: September-17-10 12:36 PM
To: reviewboard
Subject: Manual server updates required: Install GNU Patch problem
Have insalled memcached and restarted apache afterward. It made no
difference.
Can anyone help? I really want to use this product for my whole team
but if the installation is this hard I will have to look at
alternatives.
Thanks
On Sep 20, 1:11 pm, Ian ian.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Tim
OK, I feel dumb even asking this, but how can I tell if the highly
recommended python-memcached is working? For that matter, how can I
tell if I have memcached successfully installed? Should I see a
memcached process? Is that at all related to the Apache2
mod_mem_cache or mod_cache?
Ian
/Data/Sites/Default/codereviews/search_index
drwxr-xr-x 2 _www admin 68 Jan 20 01:04
/Library/Server/Web/Data/Sites/Default/codereviews/search_index
It’s an empty directory though. Anyone seen this one?
Ian
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
They were installed as system packages I think? sudo easy_install put them
in /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages
Ian
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 7:48:17 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
It's failing to access either django.conf.settings or reviewboard.settings
(it's not immediately clear
That is to say I started with a brand new server yesterday.
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 9:38:19 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
Yep, they were both installed in one shot; just sudo easy_install
ReviewBoard. Installed cleanly as of yesterday. Review Board itself
seems to work just fine; posting
Anything I can do about it or am I out of luck until 1.7.3?
Ian
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 8:44:52 AM UTC-8, christop...@gmail.com wrote:
Same problem on Fedora 18 / reviewboard 1.7.2
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user
Alright, thanks, I’ll keep an eye out for the next release!
Ian
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:21:56 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, that's your best bet for now. There's a pretty critical bug we're
trying desperately to solve, and then we can get a release out that will
also
Hey,
I originally installed Reviewboard using an egg to get a certain version to
migrate an existing Reviewboard server to our new one. Now we need to
upgrade the new servers Reviewboard version. I've tried using the
easy_install -U upgrade way. I've tried installing manually from a tar.gz
a search for the ReviewBoard-1.6.15*.egg, after I install
version 1.7.19, it looks like the easy_install completely removes it. I'm
using 'find / -name ReviewBoard1.6.15' to search.
By the way I'm using python 2.6.6
On Friday, December 6, 2013 8:46:53 PM UTC-6, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ian,
Can
I'm trying to use Search with ReviewBoard 2.0.2. I simply checked Enable
search and left the Search index directory empty (which the docs say
lets it use the default). Then I did rb-site manage /path/to/my/site
rebuild_index which warned me and then said this.
Removing all documents from your
.
Skipping 'class 'django_evolution.models.Version'' - no index.
Skipping 'class 'django_evolution.models.Evolution'' - no index.
Ian
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:57:57 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ian,
Just to check, is that directory and everything in it writeable by the web
at 2:32:22 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com javascript:) wrote:
Looks like I have django_haystack-2.1.0-py2.7.egg
and Whoosh-2.6.0-py2.7.egg installed.
Everything appears to be writable by the web server (_www).
$ ls -l /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root
Anyone have any ideas? =\
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:25:29 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
$ sudo -u _www rb-site manage /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
rebuild_index -- -v 3
WARNING: This will irreparably remove EVERYTHING from your search index in
connection 'default'.
Your choices
this.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On July 1, 2014 at 11:25:02 AM, Ian (iand...@mac.com javascript:) wrote:
Anyone have any ideas? =\
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 4:25:29 PM UTC
://www.beanbaginc.com
On July 1, 2014 at 2:15:19 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com javascript:) wrote:
I'm getting an error making qs. Did I type it wrong?
$ sudo rb-site manage /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard shell
Python 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014, 22:15:05)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 5.0
Hmm. My instance doesn't need multiple levels of security, is there a way
other than using review groups? If we could somehow limit overall
authentication to a particular LDAP group then we could make all our
repositories public.
Ian
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:04:26 PM UTC-7, Christian
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:39:04 AM UTC-7, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/19/2014 03:52 AM, Ian wrote:
I really don't want my entire organization to be able to log into my
Review Board server, I only want to allow a few LDAP groups to connect.
Is there any way to set up Review Board
I did the easy_install -U thing to update Review Board, and then the
rb-side upgrade thing to upgrade my site. I get this output though, and
now I can't view anything in Review Board. Any workarounds much
appreciated!
$ sudo rb-site upgrade /Library/Server/Web/Data/WebApps/ReviewBoard
. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
On September 15, 2014 at 6:37:05 PM, Ian (iand...@mac.com javascript:)
wrote:
I did the easy_install -U thing to update Review Board, and then the
rb-side upgrade thing to upgrade my site. I get this output though, and
now I can't view anything in Review Board
I was running 2.0.6. I'll try to figure out the PostgreSQL equivalent to
drop the index and try again.
Ian
On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:44:48 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hmmm, it should have tried to drop the old index in that upgrade. Very
odd.
What version were you running
Phew, that worked, thanks!
Ian
On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:45:50 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
I was running 2.0.6. I'll try to figure out the PostgreSQL equivalent to
drop the index and try again.
Ian
On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:44:48 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hmmm, it should
I'm unable to add a GitLab Enterprise Edition 6.6.2-ee repository to review
board. When I try I get the error message A repository with this name was
not found on this group, or your user may not have access to it.. If I
log in with the same username then I can see the group and repository so
, 2014 8:59:18 AM UTC+11, Ian wrote:
I'm unable to add a GitLab Enterprise Edition 6.6.2-ee repository to
review board. When I try I get the error message A repository with this
name was not found on this group, or your user may not have access to it..
If I log in with the same username
but none of them worked. This is the clone URL.
https://gitlab.sd.mycompany.com/my-group/myrepository.git
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 3:57:42 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
Can you provide a screenshot of the repository configuration, and the Git
checkout path for that repository
I forgot to mention I tried the Service URL both with and without a
trailing slash. Where are the Review Board log files?
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:30:55 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ian,
That looks correct, except it will have to be myrepository.
Can you check
I turned on logging and then tried to add the repository but it logged
nothing. Maybe I need to kick apache or something, I'll do that a little
later (since people are still using the server) and then see if I get any
better logging.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:41:20 PM UTC-8
Yep, I can fully log in from a web browser on the server.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:18:29 PM UTC-8, MoonWalker wrote:
this may sound kind of silly, but are you actually able to ping the GitLab
Server from the RB server?
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:47:46 AM UTC+11, Ian wrote
We're on 2.0.11. I tried rebooting the server, but it still logs nothing
when I try to add the repository. Trying to get logging on the GitLab side.
Ian
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:41:32 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
What version of Review Board are you using?
I'm away from
No go on that, apparently they don't have a very high log level on that
server. Would it help to do a Charles proxy from my Review Board server?
Or are there specific URLs that I can try to hit to verify what Review
Board is trying to access?
Ian
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 11:55:44 AM
To close the loop on this, our GitLab server got upgraded to 7.2.2-ee and
now it's working!
Ian
On Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:33:18 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
No go on that, apparently they don't have a very high log level on that
server. Would it help to do a Charles proxy from my Review
Search doesn't want to work on my 2.0.15 installation. I did rebuild_index
which worked for the first time ever (all of our reviews belong to private
review groups). But when I actually try to search I get a 500 error and
then the server emails me this.
Traceback (most recent call last):
I'm searching for a ticket number, it's just a 9 digit number. Checked the
ownership, it's _www so that seems correct (that's the name of the apache
user on OS X).
Ian
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 7:14:45 PM UTC-7, MoonWalker wrote:
make sure that you still have www-data as a user/grp
groupname
Repository Name: repositoryname
Ian
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received th
Yes, existing review requests against the repository are loading, I just
can't change the repository configuration.
Ian
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:30:51 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Do existing review requests against this repository still work? Is th
Any idea on how I could fix this?
Ian
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-8, Ian wrote:
>
> Yes, existing review requests against the repository are loading, I just
> can't change the repository configuration.
>
> Ian
>
> On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:30:5
in a web browser?
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 12:00:54 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Sounds like that auth token may have also been removed. We don't really
> have a good way of resetting these for GitLab right now in Review Board.
> Th
How many repositories total? Probably way (way) more than 100. But I only
have about 10 configured in Review Board.
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:18:18 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> There's a few possible APIs that it may call, but I realize
Oh sorry I thought you meant total repositories on the server. This user
only has access to 1 group and 6 repositories under that.
Ian
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 11:58:45 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
wrote:
>
> Okay, this is likely the issue. The repositories can't be found beca
So close. That gave me a different token value from the original one, but
now I'm back to "A repository with this name was not found on this group,
or your user may not have access to it."
Ian
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 1:37:01 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> We
...) Which is kind of weird because now it has
the URL wrong (or at least it's displaying it wrong in the Review Board
UI). It says git@:/MyProject.git when it's supposed to be
git@:/myproject.git. But everything seems to be working, so
I guess who am I to argue with success? So I guess th
d":true
and doesn't show up in the GitLab UI.)
So I went back to Review Board and pasted the working private token into
the Hosting Account and saved that. But now when I try to save a
repository I get this error.
IV must be 16 bytes long
Ian
On Thursday, December 17, 2015 at 12:53:26
Our GitLab
installation has been upgraded a few times too, it's GitLab Enterprise
Edition 7.14.3-ee 60aabef if that matters.
Ian
On Monday, December 7, 2015 at 1:53:02 AM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Can you verify that the username associated with those repositories stil
to httpd.conf but it doesn't appear that ReviewBoard is
picking this up and carrying it through login.
Is this not yet support or have I missed something? If anyone else has
this working I'd be grateful to know what SSPI settings you have in
httpd.conf.
Many thanks :)
Ian
--
Want to help
setuptools-0.6c11
Python 2.6.6
Silk Subversion 1.6.12 (x64)
Memcached
WSGI Apache module
SSPI Authentication Apache module
Christian: Shout me if you want any beta testing of the installer
module :)
Regards, Ian.
On Jan 6, 8:34 pm, Andrew Leppke alep...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to determine
previously and can think all I have changed recently is
to add a trailing backslash to the repository URL.
Is there any debugging I can do further to find the issue?
Thanks, Ian.
On Jan 24, 6:34 pm, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote:
Any additional information what kind of repository You
Changed Date: 2011-01-25 16:34:26 + (Tue, 25 Jan 2011)
Cheers, Ian.
On Jan 26, 9:03 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
For Subversion repositories, we attempt to query the information on the
remote server for UUID comparisons. It sounds like this is what's failing
We've just moved to GHE and would welcome better built-in support, so +1.
Happy to contribute if I can.
Cheers, Ian.
On Friday, 8 March 2013 19:42:30 UTC, Eric Schoonover wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what the appropriate Raw file URL mask is for a
GitHub Enterprise installation. Can
Hi Christian,
Thanks, that would be excellent!
Certainly with (deserved) costs involved I would need to be able to justify
the advantage of ReviewBoard over build-in reviewing of GHE, but suspect
that won't be too hard.
Best wishes, Ian.
On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 10:09:31 UTC+1, Christian
.egg/rbtools/api/resource.py,
line 284, in __getattr__
raise AttributeError
AttributeError
hagar:gtrunk ipm$
I guess back to 0.57 for now.
Regards,
Ian
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:28:25 AM UTC-4, Lee Griffiths wrote:
Thanks for getting back to me :)
Is just running rbt with -d
56 matches
Mail list logo
