On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 11:10:26PM +0200, Someone wrote:
What is the recommended MaxDirectMemorySize for fred with 150 connections?
Don't tell me 256MB or something like this, I really don't think it must be
that high.
The recommended size is however big the main memory setting is.
--
Matthew
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:14:33PM -0700, Scott Call wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:01:02 +0200, Martin Scheffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 02:01 schrieb Scott Call:
I get the following when I run start-freenet under mandrake 10 (log
level debug):
...
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:21:17AM -0700, miguel wrote:
Just wondering... with all this encryption permeating Freenet
there remains a gaping hole through which the nazi's could saunter through
with their spy tools and legal bypasses to incriminate any and all Freenetters
they choose to
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 03:38:35PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
miguel writes:
Just wondering... with all this encryption permeating Freenet
there remains a gaping hole through which the nazi's could saunter through
with their spy tools and legal bypasses to incriminate any and all
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:50:52PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Or something like that. The real and ever-present danger
against freenet is not in your IP being shown to your peers.
It is in (a) the integrity of its developers and (b) in the
security of the software archive. If the latter
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:22:41AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the uploader
Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had a reasonable
suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime. In fact in some cases a
deliberate attempt to not obtain knowledge
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 06:09:52PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
As for the uploader
Willful blindness can not protect you if it can be shown that you had
a reasonable suspicion to believe they you are committing a crime. In
fact in some cases a
IANAL but there HAVE been recent US cases where major P2P systems have been
found not to be in violation of the law. Otherwise INDUCE would be
unnecessary.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:35:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet.
It
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my
reading of the Induce Act, Freenet would *probably* be safe as none of
its features are expressly intended to allow people to infringe
copyright law (this is
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:31:11PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much
the same way actually. But the problem is that there is no
machine that can just tell us what your intent was.
Here's an answer from a real lawyer:
http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/p2p_copyright_wp.php
2. Your two options: total control or total anarchy.
In the wake of recent decisions on indirect copyright liability, it
appears that copyright law has foisted a binary choice on P2P
developers: either build a
Stable build 5089 is now available. Please upgrade. You will probably
need to reseed. The current seednodes.ref at
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ will be sufficient.
To upgrade:
On Windows, use the update option on the start menu, if it is there.
On linux, stop the node, run update.sh, and
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 11:08:19PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Or something like that. The real and ever-present danger
against freenet is not in your IP being shown to your peers.
It is in (a) the integrity of its developers and (b) in the
security of the software archive
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:34:53PM -0700, Scott Call wrote:
It's supposed to infinite loop. Hence waiting. It's waiting for I/O or
something. What do you see on normal? On minor?
D'oh sorry, that's my misunderstanding then.
With minor I get:
Aug 4, 2004 1:31:49 PM (freenet.node.Main,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:17:45PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:35, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:31:11PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 16:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure where your 'village' is but here it works much
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my
reading of the Induce Act, Freenet would *probably* be safe
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:00:22AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They do have a choice, nothing is forcing them to run freenet.
Shaky logic. Nothing is forcing postmen to work for the USPS, yet if
it were to be found that a postman had
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:42:49AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:38, Toad wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
While I am no fan of the Induce
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote:
The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet.
It's part of its very basic design features.
Same is true of the postal system (otherwise they would mandate
This thread is on the wrong list. At least this part of this thread.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:44:37AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 5 Aug 2004, at 01:39, Toad wrote:
The problem is that ignorance is indeed a goal in itself on Freenet.
It's part of its very basic design features.
Same
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 02:02:18AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
In any case, I don't see any reason to think that Freenet is illegal
under current US or UK law. Whereas I see every reason to expect it to
be criminalized under INDUCE - which is designed to make it easy to
criminalize things like
You mean your subscription to the mailing list?
If so, what do you think this means?:
Unsubscribe at
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
It is on all mails from this list...
Or do you mean your paypal subscription, if any?
You can also do that yourself, from
We are trying to reset the stable network because of the recent changes
leading to clashes, bugs and appaling performance. I hope that having a
network where all nodes have roughly the same routing code and rate
limiting code will improve on the present problems more quickly than
waiting for 5087
I apologize for this getting through. It's possible it was a mistake on
my part, it's also possible that the spammer subscribed to the list... I
will find out either way.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is
It's not in the post logs... Am I going crazy here?
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 06:17:52PM +0100, Toad wrote:
I apologize for this getting through. It's possible it was a mistake on
my part, it's also possible that the spammer subscribed to the list... I
will find out either way.
--
Matthew J
It's a bit perplexing. I get DNFs and RNFs; the RNFs don't seem
particularly incredible... mostly.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 07:36:07PM +0200, Someone wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I put a new permanent node online. (30GB storage for FN)
But I can't really surf on freenet, not much
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 07:35:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
man... the recent changes knocked me right off the network.
Had it working in OSX for a bit using an old version
What happens exactly? RNFs? How many connections are open?
Trying in Linux, firewall on/off nothing seems to
Okay, I think I know what's causing the increased memory usage. Will be
fixed in 5088.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:06:54PM +0200, Jano wrote:
Klaus Br?ssel wrote:
Am Dienstag, 27. Juli 2004 23:26 schrieb Toad:
Stable build 5087 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Please
Umm, it ran out of memory. You can either wait for 5088 or increase the
-Xmx setting.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:32:41PM -0700, miguel wrote:
For the first time since I started Freenet some 10 months ago it has failed!
Build 5085 was fine. 5086... trash. Downhill. It would not find even YoYo,
Obviously my efforts are worthless. I should go get a job stacking
shelves.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 08:32:12AM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 06:06, Jano wrote:
Solved it changing the -Xmx128m to -Xmx256m.
I suppose this can be a general problem, I'm running stable
Please try the new freenet-ext.jar. I have arranged to link
libgcc_s.so.1 statically in libjcpuid. At least I think I have...
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 06:25:23PM -0700, S A wrote:
Linux, 2.4.18 kernel, i686
Process is niced, CPU bound using 100%. Web interface slooow to non-functional.
Maybe you are right. I did see some suspicious RNFs earlier...
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 11:15:40AM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 08:42, Toad wrote:
Obviously my efforts are worthless. I should go get a job stacking
shelves.
Not at all. I'm just pointing out the facts
Stable build 5087 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Please upgrade. You can do this on Windows by using the update option on
the start menu. On Linux, OS/X etc, you can update by using the
update.sh script (and restart the node). You can alternatively shut down
your node and
I don't think so. There are issues with routing (or there were; there
are more but I'm not sure how to approach them), there are issues with
connections, with the balance between load and routing, and so on...
Most of these can eventually be solved.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:33:07AM +, Wayne
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:14:41PM +0200, Marc wrote:
Hi toad, you wrote
Recent builds, both stable and unstable, have a bug that causes
connections to fail with crypto related errors. This is probably not due
to NativeBigInteger, as it happens on stable, which doesn't have NBI.
Iakin has
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 03:20:04AM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Will be committed to unstable soon.
Having read http://people.redhat.com/drepper/assumekernel.html I think
we can do away with the distribution check and set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
Umm, build 5029 ?!?!?
That is _REALLY_ old.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:02:26PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
When trying to insert a NIM (on the Swedish Cannabis site, which uses a
standard-looking NIM form), I get this message:
The Insert Request failed.
Reason: Request failed
Will be committed to unstable soon.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:00:03AM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Since version 9.1 SuSE is using NPTL by default. To tell an application
not to use NPTL, it is recommended to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL to 2.4.1.
You'll find a trivial patch to start-freenet.sh
You need at least 1.4.2_05, or you will get NumberFormatExceptions and
NullPointerExceptions in BigInteger.doubleValue().
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_03-b02, mixed mode) on Linux
2.6.7, Athlon XP. After running for about
Recent builds, both stable and unstable, have a bug that causes
connections to fail with crypto related errors. This is probably not due
to NativeBigInteger, as it happens on stable, which doesn't have NBI.
Iakin has produced it reliably, although most nodes seem to work anyway.
It can be reliably
Probably a hardware problem. Is it overheating?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:58:26PM -0700, Shoey Fighter wrote:
Hello. I have recently installed Slackware 10.0 (java 1.4.2) and the latest
stable build of Freenet. It worked seemingly fine for a few days, but then
after letting it go by itself
Because all the nodes are backed off. If you upgrade to 5085 this will
be clearer.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:36:08PM -0400, Nick Tarleton wrote:
I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun
JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is
Freenet stable build 5085 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, if you
are running a stable branch node (if you are running unstable, you'll
know that you're running unstable). You can do this using the update.sh
script on POSIX-like systems such as Linux and MacOS/X (or Darwin):
AAARGH. Sorry, deceived by the subject line.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:35:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mail Delivery - This mail couldn't be displayed
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is
to quit the entire freenet,
i start to use freenet because of it's working philosofy.
my $0,02
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 23:51, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| No, if you can do that, then you can portscan for Freenet nodes. That's
Unstable 60168 is now in CVS. The snapshots are updating. Stable 5086 will
be released shortly. If you are running unstable it is strongly advised
to upgrade as this build fixes a major vulnerability of Freenet to
passive traffic analysis, relating to packet sizes. It will be a little
wasteful of
Stable build 5086 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Please upgrade ASAP (if you are running the stable branch, which most
Freenet users are). This build fixes a fairly major vulnerability to
passive traffic analysis whereby an attacker could determine (on
uncongested links) the
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 10:19:55PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| java -cp freenet.jar freenet.Version on a command line?
Freenet: Fred 0.5 (protocol STABLE-1.50) build 5084 (last good build: 5083)
| Show me it.
Same
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:52:05PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
People have run public nodes before, but Google never indexed them
beyond the main Web Interface page, so their audience consisted of
people who a) were already Freenet users and b) knew exactly what to
search for in Google to
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Well, this contradics what you just wrote above. If you are right
on this point, then your fears about thousands of users leeching
and burdening freenet without giving anything back are unfounded
already because
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:48:29PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
|Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node
|looks fine, only I get
Probably you just need to continue waiting. A few things to check
though:
1. What did you change max connections to?
2. Are you firewalled or behind any sort of NAT? The Transports box on
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env would be interesting
to see (it will give me your IP
Seems a bit flaky. Every so often I get an Apache error.
For example:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],aAEwN5~NVmuIvZdfqlORxg/BSIT/20// on
this server.
The blocks appear to prevent access to anything sensitive. I think you
probably want to set publicNode=true
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:26:04PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Is there a list somewhere of the query strings used?
For fproxy:
?key=key
?htl=number
?linkhtl=number
?mime=mime type
?date=date
?rdate=true|false
?force=short hex cookie
Probably there are more
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Indeed. Thus we have NIMs, FreeMail and Frost within Freenet, and
outside it we have Mixmaster remailers, IIP, I2P, various kinds of
proxies and so on. Sadly some people use hushmail too, which is not
exactly the safest option.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:14:49AM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
I wrote:
Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion
up to this point is probably a meaningless exchange based
on some misunderstanding on my part. But what?
[URIs from logs]
Would be interested to see
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zenon Panoussis wrote:
|
| Toad wrote:
|
| The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces
| the useability of freenet
|
|
| Of course. There are ways to implement
I need the output of:
java -version 21 | head -n 1 | sed s/java version \\(.*\)\/\1/
on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the
JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta).
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey -
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 02:14:38PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Hello everyone.
I started a node on a machine with lots of bandwidth and a very
lousy I/O subsystem. Not much else is going on on the machine, so
without freenet the load is steadily between 0.01 and 0.10. When
freenet runs,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:37:41PM +0300, Roger Oksanen wrote:
I run freenet niced at +10 on a 2x500MHz computer, load stays at 2-3 all
the time.
I suspect the problem you have lies in the fact that freenet will eat
ALL available bandwidth that you give it, which will lead to
starvation,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Roger Oksanen wrote:
I run freenet niced at +10 on a 2x500MHz computer, load stays at 2-3 all
the time.
Ah yes, I forgot to mention that. It's niced at 19. Beats me how
something that's niced 19 can bring the load to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Arnold Weizendrescher wrote:
Hello,
yesterday, there was a post on the Frost-board
freenet where the anonymous poster claims to have
found a severe freenet exploit. He explains that he
could determine anyones IP address, no matter how many
hops the
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
Strange. What is your logLevel ?
Well, that's relative. The log level is set to debug, but the
log file is a FIFO, where a simple perl script greps for URIs
and dumps the rest. My idea was to feed those URIs
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
Toad wrote:
I recommend you set the following:
logLevelDetail=freenet.client:debug
You did uncomment it, right?
Of course :)
...that now the URIs don't get logged. '
That's strange. What URIs were you after
Should be fixed in 60160.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:50:31PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
15.7.2004 12:46:37 (freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread, YThread-29,
ERROR): Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:57:54AM +, Phil wrote:
sysrq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe he was refering to someone on listening on your connection so
that they could see what you are inserting and browsing on freenet.
That's what I was saying. People seem to be under the
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:01:23PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
David Masover writes:
In theory (and practice, according to Kenman's tests), NGRouting favors
fast nodes, but due to request intervals, the local node will also contact
other nodes.
In theory, it also favours WORKING nodes. :)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:47:42PM +, phil wrote:
Yes, it is. What precisely is not encrypted?:
I was under the impression that key requests themselves were not encrypted and
might be matched by a determined eavesdropper to eg a requested known nasty
freesite (which is encrypted)?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:03:37PM +, phil wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. All inter-node communications are encrypted. Separately, all data is
encrypted at the file level.
OK welcome to blab-out-my-arse-ville!! I'm glad to be corrected clearly need
to study-up
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require an academic university level of bandwidth
This is because of an interaction between 60149 and 60147's bugs. I am
resetting the unstable network. Anyone who wants in early, please mail
me and I will send you seednodes and a jar. I won't update the snapshots
until there are at least 10 nodes on the new network.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet
managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB cap, not good. Anyway,
that's the sort of transfer you can expect
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:31:23PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
| Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node
| responds in a reasonable
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:48:41PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Todd, now that you're back with us: Obviously going into the 100% state
after loosing a connection does nothing beneficial for the network. If
I kill my note each evening in anticipation of the death and then
reactivate it
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
Unfortunately sometimes the providers put in some NAT boxes or a proxy
that prevents this system from
Anyway, how does the code work? Is it open source? Does it use UPP?
Could we adapt it?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:29:36AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 10:20:59PM +0100, Toad wrote:
Ouch. I thought it just got dyndns to detect your IP on the other end?
Unfortunately
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:55:53 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I installed from
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:06:46AM -0400, Stephen P. Schaefer wrote:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple
days
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:00:28PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Florian Streck wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 01:30:57PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Saw the port 8891 in freenet.conf only today What are distribution
servlets used for? My nodes seems to be running ok with this port
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us with monthly bandwidth caps.
It does?! I
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:27:35AM +0200, Dynamo wrote:
HI,
I got a problem with freenet . I am sure I configured freenet correctly and
forwarded the right ports I although createt an dyndns.org account only for
freenet
Do you have incoming connections on
it'd be nice.
There's a suggestion for you Toad ;)
Changing bandwidth limits on the fly may be quite difficult, but we'll get
around to it eventually.. :)
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our
When was outputBandwidthLimit EVER in kilobytes/sec? Maybe the Windows
configurator used kB/sec...
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:46:29AM +0200, Florian Streck wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Toad wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:50:55AM +0200, Garb wrote:
Yes, it works really
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 08:38:28AM +, phil wrote:
Security policy won't allow setting of fixed IP freenet won't work.
Well, technically, you could run Freenet anyway. It's just that it would
take a little longer to learn its way around the network. You do have
the ability to open
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:15:50PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?
I'm not sure. It depends on various factors. For example, which branch
you are running.
I'm getting lots of
pages taking
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:18:28AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Which of these two shows the specialisation of a node?
Both...
--
Best regards,
Weiliang
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:12:59PM -0500, Robert Greenage wrote:
is active x required to d/l node references? i have been unable to d/l references
using any browser other than ie. after installing the ie patch that alledgely stops
ie from allowing javascript to write to teh os /disk i could
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Specifically, the I am referring to the histograms that you can get from
/servlet/nodestatus/. Also does the Y axis represent the entire key space?
Counts of keys usually. Try the raw links...
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL
Strange.
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html (top 10 or so
lines?)
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/ocmContents.html (top few
lines) ?
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 03:23:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the opposite problem. My node can retrieve pages (very
Please send everything to me directly.
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:43:16PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Toad: I will not try to send the log(s) unless request.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:37:00PM +0200, Jano wrote:
Phil wrote:
Sorry, hold on! I finally found the full set up instructions under the
Frost guide. Unfortunately the newbie windows guide gave me (and no
doubt many who 'no speak geek') the impression all I had to do was
download
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:06:00PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:56:13AM -0400, Paul wrote:
Many dialup connections are regularly reset. They probably would have
locked his account if he had gone over bandwidth or connection time.
Getting
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 03:04:32PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
The second day that it occurred, I was quite unable to evaluate the
system as I had to kill javaw and freenet
to get loose from the state. Ctr-Alt-Del finally interrupted, but that
only got me to the Windows Security
window
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:08:53 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have no idea WHY it lost the connection to the ISP? Did they contact
you to complain about bandwidth usage or anything? How do you connect to
the internet? Has that changed recently?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 06:38:37PM
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 02:22:39AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
What are the difference between these two set of data?
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/inboundContacts.txt
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/inboundRequests.txt
Inbound contact attempts is different from
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:27:31AM -0400, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
Anyway the freenet-related stuff at the bottom looks interesting. I
think the reputation stuff may be quite generalizable for a lot of
other stuff. There's occasionally talk of how to influence unwanted
stuff into expiring
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:41:17PM +0200, Jano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean, like Freemail?
http://www.freenet.org.nz/freemail/
Freemail is an idea I like a lot but at least my windows experience has
been... lacking. The alpha 20 has been there for ages... is it still
under
You have no idea WHY it lost the connection to the ISP? Did they contact
you to complain about bandwidth usage or anything? How do you connect to
the internet? Has that changed recently?
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 06:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Restarted freenet last night. Slow to make
301 - 400 of 706 matches
Mail list logo
