Chris Ilias nmo2@... writes:
On 11-06-15 2:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user it, it
gone be daxxxed.
Phillip, prejudice comments like that are not welcome here. In the past,
you've spread a lot of misinformation about
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting from 2.1, the /usr/local/seamonkey/plugins
On 12/07/2011 01:32, Alain Alain wrote:
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my
Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting
Alain Alain wrote:
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting from 2.1, the
On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
You don't understand...
No, /you/ don't understand...
No, it's you that doesn't understand...
The discussion has gone nowhere and has gone on way too long. If you
care to continue it, please take it
On 07.07.2011 01:01, Chris Ilias wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
You don't understand...
No, /you/ don't understand...
No, it's you that doesn't understand...
The discussion has gone nowhere
with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Multivac.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 06/07/2011 19:03, Rufus told the world:
No. You just don't understand what I'm getting at. I'm not saying
bring Mozilla to iOS. I'm saying it's not impossible to duplicate
the SM experience using WebKit.
For a given, very particular, very limited
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to resource constraints (and
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let
J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so
due to resource constraints (and just not wanting to -
which is argument #1 in a volunteer community).
Robert Kaiser
That's what I was looking to hear. Not that it's impossible.
Look Rufus.
You have now strayed far off the topic of criticizing Seamonkey 2.1.
Really, your rants belong
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Actually, 2.3 might be something I could be interested in. Maybe. Too
many things are changing in the Mac world at once...
My big fear remains the Lion OS, it's iOS-like full screen app
implementation (which I hope I can turn off, or find a hack to turn off)
is.
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Amstrad PCW.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 14:44, J. Weaver Jr. told the world:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another one
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari
under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my HOLMES IV.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world:
I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand
new* product - that certainly isn't impossible or not allowed, and
there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples
store
On 7/4/11, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a
cyberzen wrote:
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another one that I like
Hi,
I recently upgraded SeaMonkey from Ver. 2.0.14 to 2.1.
The lethal results were:
1. I lost the Status Bar while in Mail mode. It is there in BROWSING,
COMPOSER, ADDRESS BOOK CHAT ZILLA modes, but not when the Mail List
is displayed.
2. While composing a msg, I used to have a horizontal tool
Avraham Ariel wrote:
1. I lost the Status Bar while in Mail mode. It is there in BROWSING,
COMPOSER, ADDRESS BOOK CHAT ZILLA modes, but not when the Mail List
is displayed.
This can be caused by incompatible extensions, in this case
MailNews-related ones. For me it was Mailbox Alert 0.14.5
Avraham Ariel wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded SeaMonkey from Ver. 2.0.14 to 2.1.
The lethal results were:
1. I lost the Status Bar while in Mail mode. It is there in BROWSING,
COMPOSER, ADDRESS BOOK CHAT ZILLA modes, but not when the Mail List
is displayed.
2. While composing a msg, I used to
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I'll probably get my post taken down for this, but wouldn't it be easier
to provide a compatibility check disable in about:config that actually
WORKS instead of having some of us creating hacked xpi files and others
staying with old versions because they
Philip Chee wrote:
On 13/06/2011 08:21, bern...@nospam.com wrote:
I have just installed Seamonkey 2.1 over the last version 2.0.14. In any
event something seems strange to me. The text in the browser window
looks like a printer running out of ink. The letters are there but the
text is not clean
Craig wrote:
2. In going to other pages, I have gotten a warning bar about
re-directing. I clicked allow there and it didn't happen again.
I know there must be a setting someplace, but I cannot find it (and I
even checked the FAQ this time).
Preferences - Appearance - Content - Warn me when
Craig wrote:
I know there must be a setting someplace, but I cannot find it (and I
even checked the FAQ this time).
The answer that Herrmann gave (thanks!) is now part of the FAQ, too.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
- Content - Warn me when web sites try to
redirect...
Hope this helps
It works! It works!
Somehow I saw it when I first set up SeaMonkey 2.1 and thought it might
be helpful. Then, when I went back to correct it, I didn't see it when I
looked at the Content tab. I looked more carefully
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Craig wrote:
I know there must be a setting someplace, but I cannot find it (and I
even checked the FAQ this time).
The answer that Herrmann gave (thanks!) is now part of the FAQ, too.
HTH
Jens
Thank you, Jens, for keeping up the FAQ.
Craig
Now that I have gotten my bookmarks situation straightened out, I've run
into a couple more problems:
1. In going to to some pages, I get a warning bar at the top of the
window that says, SeaMonkey prevented this page from automatically
reloading. I click the Allow button, but after going
CONGRATULATIONS, Seamonkey development crew, and contributing community
members. Your extraordinary work is certainly appreciated.
I am proud to be a Seamonkey User.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 6/20/2011 5:52 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things like A beta user
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things
On 06/20/2011 01:06 PM, James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
...
I'm not too far away, but not here as much as previously. And I feel
good getting less vitriol about my work and working with people who can
do Mozilla stuff full-time. ;-)
Robert Kaiser
As one who has read and
Ant wrote:
On 6/20/2011 5:52 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html,
On 6/21/2011 6:12 PM PT, Paul Bergsagel typed:
Check and see if NoSquint is available for 2.1
I'm using NoSquint with 2.1 and it works perfectly.
Are you using
http://downloads.mozdev.org/xsidebar/mods/nosquint-1.93.2.1-mod.xpi from
http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmisc.html, or a
Ed Mullen a écrit :
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are closely-spaced 16px
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Michael Hannon schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Who's in charge now?
The collective of the SeaMonkey Council (of which I'm remaining a part,
but just as one of
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new*
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is
Keith Whaley wrote:
Nice analogy, MC...
keith whaley
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference
Keith Whaley wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as
implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating with the new version
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm finding irritating
On 6/19/11 7:40 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm
PhillipJones wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Hi. I just upgraded to Seamonkey 2.1, and I have to say, the experience
has been largely painless, and while Seamonkey 2.0.12 used to peg one
core of my CPU at 100% for hours at a time, and 2.1 doesn't. Kudos.
However, there are two things I'm
Sridhar Ayengar schrieb:
Second, I don't like the new scrolling tab bar. I prefer the old
behavior where the tabs just become unreadably small. I tend not to pay
attention to what the tabs read. Rather, I memorize the *order* of my
tabs. In this case, being able to see, at a glance, *how many*
.
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Blueberry.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my BBC Micro.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I'll probably get my post taken down for this, but wouldn't it be easier
to provide a compatibility check disable in about:config that actually
WORKS instead of having some of us creating hacked xpi files and others
staying with old versions because they can't or won't?
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store doesn't
provide. They
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it --
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:34, d...@kd4e.com told the world:
How does Midori, which ID's as Safari, fit in the mix?
I don't have any personal experience with Midori, but I understand from
the website that it depends on a separate standard installation of
Webkit,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:55:15 -0400, PhillipJones wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a
Gecko browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices.
There's simply not enough users, not enough developer interest
to do
it, while there were real Hondas to be
developed?
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Cranberry.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and interface specifications - not
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about
are a minority.
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Apple IIe.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 22:44, Rufus told the world:
That's simply not true. I have the Atomic browser installed on my iPad
and like it...and there are others.
Atomic is not a full browser either. It does not include its own
rendering engine, but uses the iOS Safari
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far more feature-rich than
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far
.
--
MCBastos
This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.
-=-=-
... Sent from my Bic.
*Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.1 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I have
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I have forgotten which file with SM
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Please don't improve the user interface, the reason I like it is that I
don't have to learn all new keystrokes and methods every 4-6 months.
The improve, is in all aspects, we don't intend to break your
experiences/learned habits there where
Glen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free software,
after all.
How
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
PhillipJones schrieb:
Answer me a Question. How many features have we users begged and plead
for developers to keep and they were removed anyway?
Fewer than the other way round. And the totally skewed sample of people
here in this newsgroup is only a tiny piece of the overall user base.
In
Rufus schrieb:
I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad
You know that Opera Mobile is not a browser and actually send everything
you type in there to a central Opera server (and I'd guess that they try
to market the data they're collecting there - I would if I
1 - 100 of 406 matches
Mail list logo
