8
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, 13:31, you wrote
ACM If you can't make the tool simple to use then no one will use it
ACM especially if it isn't a tool that is perceived as terribly important.
ACM As soon as the typical user meets PGP, they don't wish to learn about
ACM it because of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 6:54:34 AM PST, Colin Grant wrote:
First, Allie wrote:
As soon as the typical user meets PGP, they don't wish to learn
about it because of the learning curve ... the usual response...
'Why learn all this stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Melissa Reese [MR] wrote:
...
MR If you *ever* wish to communicate with anyone over the Internet on
MR any level more private than what you would write on a postcard,
MR *strong* encryption like what PGP/GnuPG offers is a very useful
MR tool.
S/MIME
Hello Allie,
That's however besides the point when you're in need of an
immediately workable solution and not one that will work if and when
you manage to get all other parties involved to install and learn
how to use PGP.
That's one of the reasons why I'll go S/MIME, so I don't have to
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:59:09 +0100, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@24 April 2002, 19:18:00 +0200 (18:18 UK time) Miguel A. Urech wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any quick and brief explanation/opinion will be appreciated.
8
On Friday, April 26, 2002, 18:58, you wrote
DH . You are right, other than with S/MIME, PGP has to be installed on
DH both the senders and the recipients computer. What about that lets
DH you shy away?
The answer quite simply is that in the scheme of things hardly
anybody uses
Hello Colin!
On Friday, April 26, 2002 at 7:14:47 PM you wrote:
Is not also true that for PGP to be of any use the recipient must
have PGP installed also? Else they cannot decode/check signature. It
is this aspect that makes me shy away from PGP
1. You are right, other than with S/MIME,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Grant [CG] wrote:
...
CG For that reason alone I see s/mime as the preferred route, if
CG indeed such a route is really necessary. Or am I missing something
Yes. If you don't use PGP with others then S/MIME is better since you
don't need a web
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 19:58 op vrijdag 26 april 2002, Dierk Haasis:
Is not also true that for PGP to be of any use the recipient must have
PGP installed also? Else they cannot decode/check signature. It is this
aspect that makes me shy away from PGP
1. You are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mrten [M] wrote:
...
M I don't think that one can verify S/MIME signed messages when one
M uses elm as a mailer, right? Or am I mistaken? Did you mean it was
M integrated in Outlook? (and now also in TB..)
Yes. TB! will verify S/MIME signed messages
Hello Marck, Dierk, Allie,
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
S/MIME tends to be simpler all round, but getting a certificate from a
recognised authority can be a bit of a chore and there is a 3.5k(ish)
overhead per signature.
Dierk Haasis wrote:
The difference between use of S/MIME and PGP is a
Hello Costas!
On Thursday, April 25, 2002 at 6:49:39 PM you wrote:
How do I do it, then?
Try %USEPGP
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.60g on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C
A person
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 8:44:30 PM, you wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2002 at 6:49:39 PM you wrote:
How do I do it, then?
Try %USEPGP
Hmm... I placed it at the beginning of the message, but it didn't
work. The message was sent out without a PGP signature.
--
Best
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Costas,
@25 April 2002, 21:09:24 +0300 (19:09 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I do it, then?
Try %USEPGP
Hmm... I placed it at the beginning of the message, but it didn't
work. The
Hello Costas,
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 9:53:00 PM, you wrote:
Hello Marck,
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 9:37:02 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Costas,
@25 April 2002, 21:09:24 +0300 (19:09 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos
wrote in [EMAIL
Hello Marck,
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 9:37:02 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Costas,
@25 April 2002, 21:09:24 +0300 (19:09 UK time) Costas Papadopoulos
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do I do it, then?
Try %USEPGP
Hmm... I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@24 April 2002, 19:18:00 +0200 (18:18 UK time) Miguel A. Urech wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any quick and brief explanation/opinion will be appreciated.
S/MIME tends to be simpler all round, but getting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:
...
MAU I am considering using PGP or S/MIME for some business
MAU correspondence (obviously with TB) and, perhaps because I have
MAU not read enough about either, it is not clear to me what are the
MAU advantages and
Dierk,
a) a message and a mail address belong together, and
b) a message has not been tinkered with.
They are both important things in many, if not most, email situations.
But I still maintain they are irrelevent on an informal public discussion list.
There are good reasons to use PGP ...
Hello Nathalie!
On Monday, April 15, 2002 at 11:03:26 AM you wrote:
Thanks to the listmembers who sent some tips for using authentication
in The Bat!
Now that I have installed PGP and created my keys, I have a formatting
question.
It seems that PGP adds a dash + a space before lignes
Hello Nathalie Marlier Seigneuret,
On Monday, April 15 2002 at 02:03 AM PDT, you wrote:
It seems that PGP adds a dash + a space before lignes beginning with a
dash, which makes the dash dash space before a signature unusable,
as the email goes out with - -- instead.
What you see is
Hello Michael Disabato,
On Sunday, April 14 2002 at 04:49 AM PDT, you wrote:
OK, that's what I thought. I'm struggling through the implementation
of GnuPG to support IDEA (RFC1991 compatibility with TB!). Once
that's done, I'll use GPGRelay as a front end for the thing.
You have to add the
Monday, April 15, 2002, 3:20:49 PM, Nick scribbled:
NA You have to add the IDEA module. If you are using Windows you can load
NA the Nullify GnuPG 1.06 Binary which includes the IDEA Module:
NA http://www.nullify.org/
Nick,
Once again, thank you for your reply. I found nullify.org while
Saturday, April 13, 2002, 11:03:59 PM, Nick scribbled:
NA Hello Michael Disabato,
and then have it re-encrypted to the subscriber keys before sending it
back out?
NA Not without intervention.
OK, that's what I thought. I'm struggling through the implementation
of GnuPG to support IDEA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 19:45:56 +0200 [ Sun, 14 Apr 2002], Daniel Maier [DM] wrote these
words of wisdom:
...
DM I'd very much like to use the built-in PGP feature, but with all
DM encyphered messages available (v 6/Win and v 5/OS2) it says
DM Unknown OpenPGP packet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In a message dated, Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:33:55 +0200, Daniel Maier [DM]
wrote:
...
DM no. After having so much trouble with a plugin, I'd like to start
DM with the built-in PGP feature. I've got a pair of keyrings from
DM PGP 6.0.2 which are good. How
Hello Daniel Maier,
On Wednesday, April 10 2002 at 02:09 PM PDT, you wrote:
Every time I try to decrypt a message there's a message box saying The
passphrase you entered does not match any of the usable listed keys.
even though I haven't tapped a single key.
It sounds as if you have checked
Hello Michael Disabato,
On Thursday, April 11 2002 at 04:11 AM PDT, you wrote:
I'm interested in using TB! for a small mailing list. Is it possible
to have TB! detect incoming mail as being encrypted to the list key
It will not be TB that detects it, rather the Plugin will detect it upon
Hello Dierk Haasis,
On Wednesday, March 27 2002 at 02:24 AM PDT, you wrote:
Especially to Nick Andriash:
Have you gotten my encrypted message and were able to decrypt it?
I'd like to know if you see any of those characters within it. I
didn't. I haven't had them ever - with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 6:14:58 PM PST, Stephen Thomas wrote:
Hello tbudl,
I just installed PGP 7.0.3, created a new key pair, and am having
trouble with The Bat finding the key pair. The Bat wants to create a
new key pair for me. How do
Hello Hans!
On Tuesday, February 5, 2002 at 6:13:25 PM you wrote:
If you then go to the outbox and open the message you see that the
PGP options you chose have been switched off.
It actually goes back to your default PGP status - I do have this with
signing on.
I would like TB! to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jim,
On 01 February 2002 at 04:03:52 -0500 (which was 09:03 where I live)
Jim wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hehehehe (boy am I in trouble!)
moderator
My left hand is reaching for the trout as the thread veers into the OT
gully.
Let's
Carren,
Thanks for letting me know I wasn't alone in having this problem. I
didn't reply for a couple of days to see if anyone had anything
further to add, but apparently not.
The ironic thing is that breaking their PGP plug-in and having to use
the PGP clipboard tools was the very reason I
Hey, hey! Did I imply I would defile myself to return to the use of
the spyware laden bloatware with its soiled diaper colored icons? Nay,
never! I just find it ironic that the thing that irritated me about
The Other Client and caused me to switch to TB! is now an irritation
(nothing more). I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Carren,
On 01 February 2002 at 17:16:00 +1300 (which was 04:16 where I live)
Carren Stuart wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Besides, the PGP tray and hotkeys really are just as quick to use as
the plugin in my humble opinion!
Yes, and
I played around a bit, but also couldn't find a common denominator.
Sometimes adding a single linefeed after makes it go away; sometimes,
before the first line; sometimes both; or not.
Like you and Carren point out, it's more of an intellectual curiosity
to me at this point. In my case, I just
I think I've been Edited. grin
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:27:53 PM, Carren Stuart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 1 February 2002 at 5:30 p.m. Clif wrote:
CO The editor however runnilng for cover!
Wow! You're in big trouble now! I'm with
Hello Gerd,
I can't confirm that. I use the ckt version for quite a long time and
I must have missed it in a first self test. Or it was just a clear
signed message that I sent to myself
--
TIA, Regards
Hanspeter
The Bat! v1.53t unter Windows 95
4.0 Build B
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 29 January 2002 at 8:27 a.m. Clif wrote:
CO Greetings, all.
CO I am using the 6.5.x PGP plug-in with TB! 1.53. Not always, but
CO frequently when I select Privacy/OpenPGP/Sign entire text it adds
CO a bunch of odd characters after the
Hello Hanspeter Schaffner !
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:42:17 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was 26.01.2002, 09:42 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
This does no more appear since I did upgrade from V. 6.5.8 to 6.5.8ckt
version.
Does anyone know why or is this normal?
I can't
Hello Carren Stuart !
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:45:21 +1300 GMT your local time,
which was 26.01.2002, 00:45 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
the plugin to me is no quicker and no more convenient
that using the tray or hotkeys function.
As usual: that depends. I for example
Hello Geordon VanTassle !
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:48:16 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was 25.01.2002, 15:48 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
Then, I went back to the folder that the cyphertext was sitting in
and saw a bunch of copies of the clear-text mail right there.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 26 January 2002 at 3:48 a.m. Geordon wrote:
GV I was decrypting an encrypted mail this morning, and I was getting
GV frustrated as to why I didn't see the cleartext.
GV Then, I went back to the folder that the cyphertext was sitting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Carren,
On 25 January 2002 at 09:18:56 +1300 (which was 20:18 where I live)
Carren Stuart wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is something that I have just recently discovered since
installing the PGP plugin. It seems to be a feature of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 12:45:21 GMT +1300 (which was 5:45 PM where I live),
this spake Carren Stuart on the subject of PGP Decrypt observation:
CS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
CS Hash: SHA1
CS On Saturday, 26 January 2002 at
Hello Geordon!
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 9:39:11 PM you wrote:
Maybe I mis-read something in the article. I thought is SAID that the
double percent sign was needed in the template. Let's try this:
You may be right; I use another scheme (see below) avoiding spaces.
I am at the moment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 9:05:36 AM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
Hello The,
I seem to be having some issues trying to set up a PGP auto-send.
[snip]
...but something seems to be screwed up.
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.53d under
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:39:37 GMT -0800 (which was 12:39
PM where I live) Melissa Reese wrote and made these points on the
subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
MR Hello Geordon,
MR Could you be a bit more specific about the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 10:54:41 AM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
Anyway, I have gotten to the point where I set up the auto-response
according to the instructions, but nothing goes out when I send a
mail to that account with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 12:02:28 GMT -0800 (which was 2:02 PM where I live),
this spake Melissa Reese on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
MR Could you post an example of how your mailto is presented *in the
MR template* that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 09:51:29 GMT +1300 (which was 2:51 PM
where I live), this spake Carren Stuart on the subject of PGP
auto-send setup question:
CS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
CS No, you didn't misread it - you *do*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 12:57:53 PM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
I sure hope that SOMEONE can tell me where I screwed up! I thought I
did everything right, but is seems not, for some reason.
Hello Geordon,
Sometimes, it's the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 13:19:22 GMT -0800 (which was 3:19 PM
where I live), this spake Melissa Reese on the subject of PGP
auto-send setup question:
MR Hello Geordon,
MR Sometimes, it's the most simple and obvious things we miss when we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 15:24:39 GMT -0600 (which was 3:24 PM where I live),
this spake Geordon VanTassle on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
Still doesn't seem to be working.
Any other ideas? Or have I stumped you? :)
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 1:28:34 PM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
Still doesn't seem to be working.
Any other ideas? Or have I stumped you? :)
In addition to having Active enabled, is Manually only also
enabled? Having both enabled
Hello Geordon,
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:28:34 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
GV Any other ideas? Or have I stumped you? :)
One I have left:
Delete the filter. :-)
No .. that's meant honestly :-)
Delete it, select one of the messages that should have been filtered
and hit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 13:40:16 GMT -0800 (which was 3:40 PM where I live),
this spake Melissa Reese on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
MR -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR Hash: SHA1
MR On Thursday, January 17,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 22:42:31 GMT +0100 (which was 3:42 PM where I live),
this spake Peter Palmreuther on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
PP Hello Geordon,
PP On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:28:34 PM you wrote (at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 22:42:31 GMT +0100 (which was 3:42 PM where I live),
this spake Peter Palmreuther on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
PP Hello Geordon,
PP On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:28:34 PM you wrote (at
Hello Geordon,
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:54:03 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
GV Ok, I THINK it worked! Could someone else try it?
Could, did, am satisfied :-)
It works :-)
No applause please *gdr* :-)))
EOT/
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 23:03:41 GMT +0100 (which was 4:03 PM where I live),
this spake Peter Palmreuther on the subject of PGP auto-send setup question:
PP Hello Geordon,
PP On Thursday, January 17, 2002 at 10:54:03 PM you wrote (at
In the primary program directory [in Win98 it might be c:\program
files\The Bat!], not in either of the subdirectories. You only need
to extract the particular .dll that goes with your version of PGP.
JN
Geordon VanTassle wrote on Saturday, January 12, 2002:
Hello TBUDL,
Where do I
Hello Costas!
On 1 Jan 2002 at 23:19:26 you wrote:
However, I would still prefer to be able to use version 2.6.3, if
possible.
When you open Tools/OpenPGP/Choose version do you find Command line
enabled? If not, you'll need its plug-in, too.
If it is enabled and all your paths are set
Hello Marck!
On 2 Jan 2002 at 01:15:57 you wrote:
CP 4. How do I decrypt PGP messages addressed to a nym that I created
CP for myself?
I'm not certain that I know what this means. If you can gain access to
the correct PGP version, you should be able to decrypt at will.
I think he means a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:58:06 +0200GMT (which was 21:58 +0100GMT where I live),
Costas Papadopoulos thought about PGP and The Bat - I need some help and wrote:
CP I want to use PGP 2.6.3i. This version worked on my PC with Pegasus
CP Mail, so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Costas,
On 01 January 2002 at 22:58:06 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:58 where I
live) Costas Papadopoulos wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made
these points:
CP 1. When I receive a PGP encrypted message and try and open it
CP with Tools | Open PGP
@ 12:33:48 + [ Sat, 29 Dec 2001], Geoff Lane [GL] wrote these
words of wisdom:
...
GL I'm trying to get my head around PGP. I'm using the internal
GL version of OpenPGP. So far, I've managed to generate a key pair
GL and I can sign messages. However, I can't find any way to provide
GL my
@ 21:30:42 + [ Sat, 29 Dec 2001], Geoff Lane [GL] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
GL I've now got 6.5.8ckt installed and (after some kerfuffle with
GL time-zones and permissions) I can now use it via PGPTray. However, I
GL can't find a TB! Plugin and can find nothing in the PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, December 29, 2001, at 2:44:23 PM PST, Geoff Lane wrote:
Thanks for that -- I've installed the 6.5 plugin from RitLabs and it
all appears to work. I've uploaded my public key to the root server
and to the UK server. So, hopefully,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 22:44:23 + [ Sat, 29 Dec 2001], Geoff Lane [GL] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
GL Thanks for that -- I've installed the 6.5 plugin from RitLabs and it
GL all appears to work. I've uploaded my public key to the root server
GL and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mrten!
On Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 at 23:40:58 you wrote:
2) Is there an easy way to encrypt an attachment together with the
message? (I use the internal PGP implementation.)
no, there is not, not to my knowledge, that is. you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Joseph N. !
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:38:25 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was 28.11.2001, 23:38 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
The PGP plug-in
signs first and then encrypts, so the message appears to be only
encrypted, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 14:42 op woensdag 28 november 2001, Joseph N.:
When I compose a message, if I click Privacy and both Sign When
Completed and Encrypt When Completed, TB! only encrypts. It does not
add a signature. Can anyone using a similar configuration
Hi Joseph,
[...]
JN When I compose a message, if I click Privacy and both Sign When
JN Completed and Encrypt When Completed, TB! only encrypts. It does not
JN add a signature. [...]
not confirmed.
(TB! 1.54/10e, PGP 6.5.8ckt(Build 06), Ritlabs-Plugin)
--
Best regards, Carsten
The Bat!
Hello Joseph,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:42:10 -0600 GMT (28/11/2001, 21:42 +0800 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
JN When I compose a message, if I click Privacy and both Sign When
JN Completed and Encrypt When Completed, TB! only encrypts. It does not
JN add a signature. Can anyone using a similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Joseph N.,
On Wednesday, November 28 2001 at 05:42 AM PDT, you wrote:
When I compose a message, if I click Privacy and both Sign When
Completed and Encrypt When Completed, TB! only encrypts. It does not
add a signature.
If you want both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:42:10 -0600GMT (which was 14:42 +0100GMT where I live),
Joseph N. thought about PGP and wrote:
JN I use PGP 6.5.8, with the plug-in from Ritlabs. My default is set to
JN enable OpenPGP, but neither to sign nor to encrypt. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 at 16:59:48 you wrote:
If you want both actions, then you have to choose Sign Encrypt
rather than each action separately.
Not with the plug-in. What you mean is how it works with PGPTray.
- --
Dierk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
I am new to PGP, so my questions may be stupid... but:
1) When I sign a message, the text Hash=MD5 is automatically
inserted on the second line. Does it serve any purpose and, if not, is
there a way to get rid of it?
2) Is there an easy way to
Wednesday, November 28, 2001, 2:41:51 PM, Rémi Pach wrote:
1) When I sign a message, the text Hash=MD5 is automatically
inserted on the second line. Does it serve any purpose and, if not, is
there a way to get rid of it?
Since there are several different versions and builds of PGP in use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Om 22:41 op woensdag 28 november 2001, Rémi Pach:
1) When I sign a message, the text Hash=MD5 is automatically
inserted on the second line. Does it serve any purpose and, if not,
is there a way to get rid of it?
no, there is no way to get rid of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Joseph N.,
On Wednesday, November 28 2001 at 02:14 PM PDT, you wrote:
I think that about takes care of all possibilities. Anyone have any
ideas what could be causing the problem?
Would you have perhaps enabled Encrypt all Messages by
Hello Mrten,
On Wednesday, November 28 2001 at 02:40 PM PDT, you wrote:
don't bother to. S/MIME is an ugly way to sign your messages, it
attaches a 5K signature to a 100 byte body.
I agree... and the size is related to the fact that S/MIME sends out
your Public Key with every message. :o(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
I disagree. Ritlabs should offer a DLL with the correct version
number, or even better: a DLL that finds the correct version number.
Offering a DLL with a wrong version number is plainly wrong.
I pretty much agree with that. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
It should have worked, see my version string.
Looks nice, I want to edit mine too! :-)
Maybe you just edited the version string in either the wrong DLL
6.5, I was told?
or the wrong place
That's what I assume. I don't really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On Friday, November 02, 2001 at 11:13:25 AM you wrote:
or the wrong place
That's what I assume. I don't really know where to edit what. Could
you maybe explain that to me in more detail? Off-list, maybe?
Actually I can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 12:51:36 PM you wrote:
Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
is no DLL with a correct version number. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Han!
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 8:45:32 AM you wrote:
Personally I'd recommend getting this one: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/
(Use the NT version if you run Windows 2000)
You may also have a look at the PGP version from
Hi Dierk,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:10:04 +0100GMT (31/10/2001, 22:10 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
DH Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
DH is no DLL with a correct version number. It doesn't make sense
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 09:49:49 +0700 [ Thu, 1 Nov 2001], Han Thomas [HT] contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
...
HT Correct. :) I've head my share of 'testing' what happens when you
HT have a PGP Disk open en the computer suddenly shuts down. PGP Disk
HT always
On Thursday, November 01, 2001, Allie C Martin wrote something about
PGP - config.problem, to which I'd like to add the following...
HT One issue for example I have with PGPDisk is that it behaves TOO
HT MUCH like a regular disk, in that if your computer is on a
HT network, an administrator
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 10:49:48 AM, you wrote:
AL Why does it show 6.0.2i instead of 6.5.8??
You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor and replace
the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall correctly) with
6.5.8. Then if you sign a message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Han Thomas:
Personally I'd recommend getting this one:
http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/ (Use the NT version if you run
Windows 2000)
please, if you must use PGPdisk, download from http://www.ipgpp.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:43:40 +0100, Mrten [M] graced us with these
comments:
...
M i think i have a tendency to go off-topic on this list, apologies :)
e-mail security? Off-topic? Nah. :-) It's very relevant and Ritlabs
has a very good solution for
Hello David,
You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor
Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?
and replace the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall
correctly) with 6.5.8.
Well, that didn't work. But if that is the only reason why the numbers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:12:07 +0700, Han Thomas [HT] wrote these
comments:
...
HT Yes... I will.. but PGP has been under development for decades.
HT SecureBat is very promising, but it is new. There will be
HT weaknesses. So even with SecureBat I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:15:22 +0530, Pkroy [P] graced us with these
comments:
...
P i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features..
P want to use PGP features but couldnot configure ..
P can anyone help..
Well, you can use TB! using PGP Tray which
Hello pkroy,
Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:59:00 PM, you wrote:
p i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features..
p want to use PGP features but couldnot configure ..
If you've never used PGP before then it's probably best if you download and
install it and read the documentation. It takes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Melissa!
On Monday, October 22, 2001 at 7:21:00 AM you wrote:
I don't use any of the plug-ins, so someone else will have to provide
more details as to their degree of integration. But the basic answer
is yes - it is possible.
Regarding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello World Cruise Travel,
On Sunday, October 21 2001 at 09:57 PM PDT, you wrote:
Is it possible to set up PGP to work from The Bat! ?
I mean, with some buttons on the menu bars?
AFAIK, no... There is no way to add a button on the Toolbars... if
401 - 500 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
