Re: TB Crashes Upon Opening URL's
On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 11:53:23 PM, Tim Hamm wrote: > Every... Is your browser already open when you try? Have you tried changing default browsers? Does some other email app successfully open the links? -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.36.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2) Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes Upon Opening URL's
Hello Dwight, Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 8:27:24 PM, you wrote: > On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 3:59:35 PM, Tim Hamm wrote: > >> TB is crashing on me whenever I try to launch a URL within my >> emails. > same url, or every url? > Every... -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes Upon Opening URL's
On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 3:59:35 PM, Tim Hamm wrote: > TB is crashing on me whenever I try to launch a URL within my > emails. same url, or every url? -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.36.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2) Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim, On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:50:40 -0700 GMT (10/Dec/09, 11:50 AM +0700 GMT), Tim Hamm wrote: >> Have you done any receive tests yet? TH> Yes, receive is all over the board when TB is actually processing, but TH> there is definitely a time-out for several seconds before TB initiates TH> the actual processing of incoming email. I think if I could figure out TH> why TB is timing out at exactly 15 seconds before initiating the TH> processing of incoming mail, this may remedy my receiving it as TH> well. Just to give another direction, what port are you using to retrieve your mail? 110 may be straight forward, but 995 may cause a delay. Not that it should cause a 15-second delay, but maybe we're up to a hidden bug here. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.10.6 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Dwight, Thursday, December 10, 2009, 9:47:49 AM, you wrote: > On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:45:57 PM, Tim Hamm wrote: > >>> Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and >>> seeing what path is reported for TEMP. >> C:\WINDOWS\TEMP > > That was where I started, but I found almost a thousand files which > were in [my user name]/appdata/local/temp instead > ccleaner cleans out all these areas so I have no temp files. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hi On Thursday 10 December 2009 at 4:47:49 PM, in , Dwight Corrin wrote: . >> C:\WINDOWS\TEMP > That was where I started, but I found almost a > thousand files which were in [my user > name]/appdata/local/temp instead That's why I suggested locating the folder by the environment variable %temp% ... If I recall correctly, C:\WINDOWS\TEMP was the Windows 98 default and C:\Documents and Settings\(username)\Local Settings\Temp was the XP default, but it could be anywhere: I have mine at T:\Temp. A thousand? I never found more than 300, and thought that was a lot! -- Best regards MFPA During an eruption - move away from the volcano - not towards it Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:45:57 PM, Tim Hamm wrote: >> Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and >> seeing what path is reported for TEMP. > C:\WINDOWS\TEMP That was where I started, but I found almost a thousand files which were in [my user name]/appdata/local/temp instead -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/5882 Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.2.13.3 ALPHA on Windows Vista version 6,0 (Service Pack 2) Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hi On Thursday 10 December 2009 at 4:45:57 AM, in , Tim Hamm wrote: >> Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a >> command window and seeing what path is reported for >> TEMP. > C:\WINDOWS\TEMP So if you were accumulating "bat*.tmp" files, C:\WINDOWS\TEMP is where they would be. -- Best regards MFPA Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello MFPA, Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 7:04:34 PM, you wrote: > Hi > On Thursday 10 December 2009 at 12:53:43 AM, in > , Tim Hamm wrote: >>> Windows Start menu | Run | Type "%temp%" (without >>> quotes) into the run box and press ENTER or click OK. >>> Search the temp folder that opens for "bat*.tmp" >>> (without quotes) and delete the found files. >>> If you just want to delete the files without looking >>> at them, you can type "del %temp%\bat*.tmp" (without >>> quotes) into a command window and press ENTER. >> No such folder exists, maybe because I use CCleaner >> often. > Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and > seeing what path is reported for TEMP. >> Have any ideas on why processing is to a snails pace? > Aside from the possibility of lots of bat*.tmp files (I don't know if > CCleaner deletes these) and having ruled out any complications with > anti-spam and anti-virus, what comes to mind is how you are connecting > to the server. Some servers allow you to send/receive through a > regular or a secure connection. If using a secure connection from TB! > to a particular server, are you also using a secure connection from > the other mail clients that connect faster? > An example is that TB! is set up to connect to one of my Yahoo > accounts via a "regular" connection and this often starts sending or > receiving within a 0-3 seconds. Another Yahoo account I have TB! set > up to contact the *same* servers via "secure to dedicated port" and > this usually starts sending in 12-15 seconds or receiving in 17-22 > seconds. If not receiving after 22 seconds I get "could not connect to > server" and have to try a few minutes later. Nothing special, I'm connecting via a "regular" connection the same as I am for Barca2 and Outlook. Talk about fast, Barca2 (Poco) is lighting fast... I wish TB retrieved and sent mail as swiftly as Barca2 -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello MFPA, Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 7:04:34 PM, you wrote: > Hi > On Thursday 10 December 2009 at 12:53:43 AM, in > , Tim Hamm wrote: >>> Windows Start menu | Run | Type "%temp%" (without >>> quotes) into the run box and press ENTER or click OK. >>> Search the temp folder that opens for "bat*.tmp" >>> (without quotes) and delete the found files. >>> If you just want to delete the files without looking >>> at them, you can type "del %temp%\bat*.tmp" (without >>> quotes) into a command window and press ENTER. >> No such folder exists, maybe because I use CCleaner >> often. > Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and > seeing what path is reported for TEMP. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP >> Have any ideas on why processing is to a snails pace? > Aside from the possibility of lots of bat*.tmp files (I don't know if > CCleaner deletes these) and having ruled out any complications with > anti-spam and anti-virus, what comes to mind is how you are connecting > to the server. Some servers allow you to send/receive through a > regular or a secure connection. If using a secure connection from TB! > to a particular server, are you also using a secure connection from > the other mail clients that connect faster? > An example is that TB! is set up to connect to one of my Yahoo > accounts via a "regular" connection and this often starts sending or > receiving within a 0-3 seconds. Another Yahoo account I have TB! set > up to contact the *same* servers via "secure to dedicated port" and > this usually starts sending in 12-15 seconds or receiving in 17-22 > seconds. If not receiving after 22 seconds I get "could not connect to > server" and have to try a few minutes later. Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 11:50:43 PM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > Monday, December 7, 2009, 5:11:26 PM, among other things, you wrote: >>> 1. Your anti virus programme turned off. TH>> Turned Off >>> 2. AntiSpamSniper and any other antispam programme turned off. TH>> Turned Off >>> 3. All message filtering turned off. TH>> Turned Off >>> 4. Any firewall programme turned off. TH>> Windows Firewall Always Off... No Third Party Firewall... Using TH>> Firewall in Router Only >>> If you will be kind enough to do as I suggest and let us all know >>> the results we will then take it from there. TH>> Here's the status of running this test. I sent a total of five emails TH>> to myself and each one took exactly 15 seconds to send. This is very TH>> odd... it appears TB has decided to time itself out until 15 seconds TH>> has elapsed before processing outgoing mail. Before anyone jumps to TH>> conclusions, my immediate send is selected. I did not run tests on TH>> retrieving email. > I have looked through my account log and actually found a recent sent > message which waited exactly 15 seconds after connecting to the SMTP server > before going out. However this is not consistent, another message completed > in two seconds, and in another case a batch of 13 almost identical messages > of about 5.1 kilobytes each went out in a total of 47 seconds. I would > usually assume this kind of variation is due to the loading on the server, > which of course can vary from moment to moment. > Have you done any receive tests yet? Yes, receive is all over the board when TB is actually processing, but there is definitely a time-out for several seconds before TB initiates the actual processing of incoming email. I think if I could figure out why TB is timing out at exactly 15 seconds before initiating the processing of incoming mail, this may remedy my receiving it as well. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim, Monday, December 7, 2009, 5:11:26 PM, among other things, you wrote: >> 1. Your anti virus programme turned off. TH> Turned Off >> 2. AntiSpamSniper and any other antispam programme turned off. TH> Turned Off >> 3. All message filtering turned off. TH> Turned Off >> 4. Any firewall programme turned off. TH> Windows Firewall Always Off... No Third Party Firewall... Using TH> Firewall in Router Only >> If you will be kind enough to do as I suggest and let us all know >> the results we will then take it from there. TH> Here's the status of running this test. I sent a total of five emails TH> to myself and each one took exactly 15 seconds to send. This is very TH> odd... it appears TB has decided to time itself out until 15 seconds TH> has elapsed before processing outgoing mail. Before anyone jumps to TH> conclusions, my immediate send is selected. I did not run tests on TH> retrieving email. I have looked through my account log and actually found a recent sent message which waited exactly 15 seconds after connecting to the SMTP server before going out. However this is not consistent, another message completed in two seconds, and in another case a batch of 13 almost identical messages of about 5.1 kilobytes each went out in a total of 47 seconds. I would usually assume this kind of variation is due to the loading on the server, which of course can vary from moment to moment. Have you done any receive tests yet? -- Best regards, Roger :flag-SouthAfrica: The Bat! v4.2.13.4 ALPHA (Home) POP3 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hi On Thursday 10 December 2009 at 12:53:43 AM, in , Tim Hamm wrote: >> Windows Start menu | Run | Type "%temp%" (without >> quotes) into the run box and press ENTER or click OK. >> Search the temp folder that opens for "bat*.tmp" >> (without quotes) and delete the found files. >> If you just want to delete the files without looking >> at them, you can type "del %temp%\bat*.tmp" (without >> quotes) into a command window and press ENTER. > No such folder exists, maybe because I use CCleaner > often. Strange. Try typing "set" (without quotes) in a command window and seeing what path is reported for TEMP. > Have any ideas on why processing is to a snails pace? Aside from the possibility of lots of bat*.tmp files (I don't know if CCleaner deletes these) and having ruled out any complications with anti-spam and anti-virus, what comes to mind is how you are connecting to the server. Some servers allow you to send/receive through a regular or a secure connection. If using a secure connection from TB! to a particular server, are you also using a secure connection from the other mail clients that connect faster? An example is that TB! is set up to connect to one of my Yahoo accounts via a "regular" connection and this often starts sending or receiving within a 0-3 seconds. Another Yahoo account I have TB! set up to contact the *same* servers via "secure to dedicated port" and this usually starts sending in 12-15 seconds or receiving in 17-22 seconds. If not receiving after 22 seconds I get "could not connect to server" and have to try a few minutes later. -- Best regards MFPA Hard work never killed anyone, but why take a risk? Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello MFPA, Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 12:47:22 PM, you wrote: > Hi > On Wednesday 9 December 2009 at 6:33:41 PM, in > , Tim Hamm wrote: >> Hello Stuart, >> Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:37:20 AM, you wrote: >>> Hello Roger, A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed >>> on: Monday, December 07, 2009 at 08:23:36 GMT +0200 >> We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving >> it! TH> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. >>> When running slow, try looking for temp files in the >>> bat directory. Sometimes there can be way too many >>> left behind.. >> This is news to me, and where and how do you check the >> temp directory to see if it's overloaded? > Windows Start menu | Run | Type "%temp%" (without quotes) into the run > box and press ENTER or click OK. > Search the temp folder that opens for "bat*.tmp" (without quotes) and > delete the found files. > If you just want to delete the files without looking at them, you can > type "del %temp%\bat*.tmp" (without quotes) into a command window and > press ENTER. No such folder exists, maybe because I use CCleaner often. Have any ideas on why processing is to a snails pace? -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hi On Wednesday 9 December 2009 at 6:33:41 PM, in , Tim Hamm wrote: > Hello Stuart, > Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:37:20 AM, you wrote: >> Hello Roger, A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed >> on: Monday, December 07, 2009 at 08:23:36 GMT +0200 > We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving > it! TH I'm referring to both sending and receiving. >> When running slow, try looking for temp files in the >> bat directory. Sometimes there can be way too many >> left behind.. > This is news to me, and where and how do you check the > temp directory to see if it's overloaded? Windows Start menu | Run | Type "%temp%" (without quotes) into the run box and press ENTER or click OK. Search the temp folder that opens for "bat*.tmp" (without quotes) and delete the found files. If you just want to delete the files without looking at them, you can type "del %temp%\bat*.tmp" (without quotes) into a command window and press ENTER. -- Best regards MFPA Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Stuart, Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:37:20 AM, you wrote: > Hello Roger, > A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on: > Monday, December 07, 2009 at 08:23:36 GMT +0200 We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! TH>>> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. > When running slow, try looking for temp files in the bat directory. Sometimes > there can be way too many left behind.. Oh, Another thing, I don't quite understand it but like clockwork, TB is taking exactly 15 seconds to send outgoing mail. Why 15, why not 2, why not 3. What determines how long TB takes to send mail? I remember several versions ago, TB would send mail almost immediately. This has been going on for quite some time now upgrading to the newer versions but I can't quite figure at what point this started happening. Receiving is a different story, it's never the same... sometimes TB retrieves mail almost immediately upon launching program and other times the mail takes forever and a day for TB to process incoming mail. This is very puzzling and if someone knows the answer I would be forever in your debt to get this one straightened out. There's nothing worse than to sit there waiting for TB to process outgoing email. I've already isolated any anti-virus, spam or firewall program out of the equation. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Stuart, Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:37:20 AM, you wrote: > Hello Roger, > A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on: > Monday, December 07, 2009 at 08:23:36 GMT +0200 We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! TH>>> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. > When running slow, try looking for temp files in the bat directory. Sometimes > there can be way too many left behind.. This is news to me, and where and how do you check the temp directory to see if it's overloaded? -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on: Monday, December 07, 2009 at 08:23:36 GMT +0200 >>> We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! TH>> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. When running slow, try looking for temp files in the bat directory. Sometimes there can be way too many left behind.. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm Using The Bat! v4.2.13.1 ALPHA On Windows 7 6.1 Build #7600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 11:23:36 PM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > Sunday, December 6, 2009, 9:33:11 PM, among other things, you wrote: TH I have tried re-installing TB twice now with the same results. I TH failed to mention before that even getting web pages from TB takes TH forever sometimes. >>> This kind of variability can be due to server overloading or heavy traffic >>> to the particular web address. i.e. nothing to do with TB. TH>> Again, I excluded the fact that this is related to server TH>> overloading... I ran my other two email clients with no issues TH>> what-so-ever. >>> We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! TH>> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. >>> It is possible that subsidiary programmes may be slowing things down on the >>> receiving side. Did all the mail clients have EXACTLY the same anti >>> virus >>> and anti spam programmes operating during your receiving tests? TH>> Yes, except for the AntiSpamSniper I have for TB. > OK Tim, to find out if TB is really the culprit, and why, we need to repeat > the comparative tests with all paramaters exactly the same with all three > e-mail clients. I suggest therefore you try the download tests with all of > the following in place: > 1. Your anti virus programme turned off. Turned Off > 2. AntiSpamSniper and any other antispam programme turned off. Turned Off > 3. All message filtering turned off. Turned Off > 4. Any firewall programme turned off. Windows Firewall Always Off... No Third Party Firewall... Using Firewall in Router Only > > To try to avoid any 'nasties' download first with your antvirus still > operating, but 'leave messages on the server'. Then run your tests as > quickly as possible thereafter with the antivirus turned off. > If you will be kind enough to do as I suggest and let us all know > the results we will then take it from there. Here's the status of running this test. I sent a total of five emails to myself and each one took exactly 15 seconds to send. This is very odd... it appears TB has decided to time itself out until 15 seconds has elapsed before processing outgoing mail. Before anyone jumps to conclusions, my immediate send is selected. I did not run tests on retrieving email. > > Good luck! -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim Hamm, On Sunday, December 6, 2009, 5:12:18 AM, Tim Hamm wrote: > Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word > doc? This has become extremely annoying to say the least. And why > does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though it's on > it's last leg. You don't mention what version of Word you are using and I guess that the lack of reports of such problems previously on the list means that the problem is specific to the configuration of your machine. Word is involved in the composing of Outlook mail, so there is a potential interaction between Word and email. I would have a look at the Email settings in Outlook - check what the default settings are for sending messages (and switch to text only as a test). It would also be worth what the default programs are for email related activities are (in Outlook 2007, look under Tools|Options|Other|Default programs. If TB is not handling all the email related activities then change it. The other thing that can sometimes cause strange application crashes is a graphic driver issue. It would be worth checking whether there are more up to date drivers available. The final thing, as others have mentioned, are firewall and anti-virus issues. Turning off these (one at a time and then both) may help to rule this out. Both are likely to have a hand in the sending of mail. I hope that you find a solution soon. I know how frustrating it is to have a difficult IT problem that no-one else experiences. -- Julian Using The Bat! v4.2.10.1 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 9:33:11 PM, among other things, you wrote: TH>>> I have tried re-installing TB twice now with the same results. I TH>>> failed to mention before that even getting web pages from TB takes TH>>> forever sometimes. >> This kind of variability can be due to server overloading or heavy traffic >> to the particular web address. i.e. nothing to do with TB. TH> Again, I excluded the fact that this is related to server TH> overloading... I ran my other two email clients with no issues TH> what-so-ever. >> We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! TH> I'm referring to both sending and receiving. >> It is possible that subsidiary programmes may be slowing things down on the >> receiving side. Did all the mail clients have EXACTLY the same anti virus >> and anti spam programmes operating during your receiving tests? TH> Yes, except for the AntiSpamSniper I have for TB. OK Tim, to find out if TB is really the culprit, and why, we need to repeat the comparative tests with all paramaters exactly the same with all three e-mail clients. I suggest therefore you try the download tests with all of the following in place: 1. Your anti virus programme turned off. 2. AntiSpamSniper and any other antispam programme turned off. 3. All message filtering turned off. 4. Any firewall programme turned off. To try to avoid any 'nasties' download first with your antvirus still operating, but 'leave messages on the server'. Then run your tests as quickly as possible thereafter with the antivirus turned off. If you will be kind enough to do as I suggest and let us all know the results we will then take it from there. Good luck! -- Best regards, Roger :flag-SouthAfrica: The Bat! v4.2.13.4 ALPHA (Home) POP3 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello tracer, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 7:27:19 PM, you wrote: > Hello Greg, > sounds like you could have found the culprit as anti virus , antispam > and antispyware acts in unpredictable ways with emails... I am running Avira AntiVir Premium for my antivirus and the antispam is AntiSpamSniper for TB. I don't know why this would have any affect on my sending and receiving of emails. I have used AntiSpamSniper for years with no problems... I even uninstalled it and uninstalled Avira and there was no change in receiving and sending of emails. The delay was the same. > Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:13:56 AM, you wrote: >> Hello Tim, >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:33:11 -0700 GMT(12/6/2009, 1:33 PM -0600 GMT), >> per mid:716668702.20091206123...@cox.net Tim Hamm wrote: TH>>> Yes, except for the AntiSpamSniper I have for TB. >> Something unique to TB which maybe the culprit. :) > Maybe another question to ask is- how many and which tools check your > mail coming in? It really should in all cases be keept to the same set > of emails so you can really compare them properly!! > Ie, as you should be able to grab some emails which you know to be > clean resend them and switch all checking off... I kept all mail on the server so each client was retrieving the same emails and this made no difference in TB. > Best regards, > tracermailto:0tra...@gmail.com > > Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: > http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Greg, sounds like you could have found the culprit as anti virus , antispam and antispyware acts in unpredictable ways with emails... Monday, December 7, 2009, 8:13:56 AM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:33:11 -0700 GMT(12/6/2009, 1:33 PM -0600 GMT), > per mid:716668702.20091206123...@cox.net Tim Hamm wrote: TH>> Yes, except for the AntiSpamSniper I have for TB. > Something unique to TB which maybe the culprit. :) Maybe another question to ask is- how many and which tools check your mail coming in? It really should in all cases be keept to the same set of emails so you can really compare them properly!! Ie, as you should be able to grab some emails which you know to be clean resend them and switch all checking off... Best regards, tracermailto:0tra...@gmail.com Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Ian, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 12:14:43 PM, you wrote: > G'day Tim, > On Monday, December 7, 2009, at 3:53:07 AM, you (Tim Hamm) wrote: >>> On the sending of mail, do you have delayed sending enabled, but the >>> alert dialog suppressed? TH>> I have immediate sending enables and not sure what you are referring TH>> to on the alert dialog suppresses. I have the mail ticker suppressed TH>> if that's what you mean. > No. With delayed sending is enabled, you can get a dialog come up > telling you when the message will actually be sent. You can turn this > dialog off. It was a possibility that this dialog might have been > turned off and so there was an apparently a delay. Under delivery type I have immediate and I have a check mark in Combined Delivery (send and receive). This problem of very slow sending and receiving has nothing to do with my smtp server or network congestion with the server. I have tested all three of my email clients, TB, Barca 2, and Outlook and TB wins the prize for taking the longest (and I mean more than 1 minute longer) to send and receive email. This problem started with version 4.1. If anyone has any ideas other than what has already been discussed, I would love to hear them. Thanks All, -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 11:03:11 AM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > Sunday, December 6, 2009, 6:45:59 PM, among other things, you wrote: TH Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH doc? >>> It does not crash for everybody, it works OK for me. I have no idea what >>> your problem may be, but suggest you try reinstalling The Bat! and then MS >>> Word if you still have a problem.. TH>> I have tried re-installing TB twice now with the same results. I TH>> failed to mention before that even getting web pages from TB takes TH>> forever sometimes. > This kind of variability can be due to server overloading or heavy traffic > to the particular web address. i.e. nothing to do with TB. Again, I excluded the fact that this is related to server overloading... I ran my other two email clients with no issues what-so-ever. TH And why does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though TH it's on it's last leg. >>> Again, I have no problem. I think it is more likely a problem with your >>> SMTP server, perhaps it is overloaded. See answer above TH>> It took 1:28 to retrieve 11 messages of which none had attachments. I TH>> have two other email clients installed, Barca2 and Outlook and the TH>> email retrieves within seconds for the same 11 messages. > We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! I'm referring to both sending and receiving. > It is possible that subsidiary programmes may be slowing things down on the > receiving side. Did all the mail clients have EXACTLY the same anti virus > and anti spam programmes operating during your receiving tests? Yes, except for the AntiSpamSniper I have for TB. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 6:45:59 PM, among other things, you wrote: TH>>> Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH>>> doc? >> It does not crash for everybody, it works OK for me. I have no idea what >> your problem may be, but suggest you try reinstalling The Bat! and then MS >> Word if you still have a problem.. TH> I have tried re-installing TB twice now with the same results. I TH> failed to mention before that even getting web pages from TB takes TH> forever sometimes. This kind of variability can be due to server overloading or heavy traffic to the particular web address. i.e. nothing to do with TB. TH>>> And why does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though TH>>> it's on it's last leg. >> Again, I have no problem. I think it is more likely a problem with your >> SMTP server, perhaps it is overloaded. TH> It took 1:28 to retrieve 11 messages of which none had attachments. I TH> have two other email clients installed, Barca2 and Outlook and the TH> email retrieves within seconds for the same 11 messages. We were talking about SENDING mail, not receiving it! It is possible that subsidiary programmes may be slowing things down on the receiving side. Did all the mail clients have EXACTLY the same anti virus and anti spam programmes operating during your receiving tests? -- Best regards, Roger :flag-SouthAfrica: The Bat! v4.2.13.4 ALPHA (Home) POP3 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 12:14:27 AM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > Sunday, December 6, 2009, 7:12:18 AM, among other things, you wrote: TH>> Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH>> doc? > It does not crash for everybody, it works OK for me. I have no idea what > your problem may be, but suggest you try reinstalling The Bat! and then MS > Word if you still have a problem.. TH>> And why does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though TH>> it's on it's last leg. > Again, I have no problem. I think it is more likely a problem with your > SMTP server, perhaps it is overloaded. I also failed to mention that this delay happens when sending email as well. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Roger, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 12:14:27 AM, you wrote: > Hello Tim, > Sunday, December 6, 2009, 7:12:18 AM, among other things, you wrote: TH>> Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH>> doc? > It does not crash for everybody, it works OK for me. I have no idea what > your problem may be, but suggest you try reinstalling The Bat! and then MS > Word if you still have a problem.. I have tried re-installing TB twice now with the same results. I failed to mention before that even getting web pages from TB takes forever sometimes. TH>> And why does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though TH>> it's on it's last leg. > Again, I have no problem. I think it is more likely a problem with your > SMTP server, perhaps it is overloaded. It took 1:28 to retrieve 11 messages of which none had attachments. I have two other email clients installed, Barca2 and Outlook and the email retrieves within seconds for the same 11 messages. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Ian, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 2:22:06 AM, you wrote: > G'day Tim, > On Sunday, December 6, 2009, at 4:12:18 PM, you (Tim Hamm) wrote: TH>> Hello TBUDL, TH>> Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH>> doc? This has become extremely annoying to say the least. And why TH>> does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though it's on TH>> it's last leg. > I am using Word 2000 and have no such issues. > Does this happen with any Word file, or just particular ones? Any > Does the file open OK if you save it first and then open it from > either Word or Explorer? Yes, sometimes this happens from other folders and Explorer. I will try reinstalling Word to see if this solves that issue. > On the sending of mail, do you have delayed sending enabled, but the > alert dialog suppressed? I have immediate sending enables and not sure what you are referring to on the alert dialog suppresses. I have the mail ticker suppressed if that's what you mean. -- Best regards, Timmailto:timh...@cox.net Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB Crashes
Hello Tim, Sunday, December 6, 2009, 7:12:18 AM, among other things, you wrote: TH> Can anyone tell me why TB crashes all the time when launching a Word TH> doc? It does not crash for everybody, it works OK for me. I have no idea what your problem may be, but suggest you try reinstalling The Bat! and then MS Word if you still have a problem.. TH> And why does TB hesitate so long in sending mail? It acts as though TH> it's on it's last leg. Again, I have no problem. I think it is more likely a problem with your SMTP server, perhaps it is overloaded. -- Best regards, Roger :flag-SouthAfrica: The Bat! v4.2.13.4 ALPHA (Home) POP3 , on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.12.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html