Thank you to the members whose terms are complete, and congratulations to
Wikimedia Espana on their new board. Best wishes to the new members!
Risker/Anne
On 4 October 2015 at 19:38, Tito Dutta <trulyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Best wishes and congrats.
>
> On 5 October 2015 a
of the scheduling conflict.
Risker/Anne
On 21 August 2015 at 16:22, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
From my perspective, this strikes me as part of the reason why national
organisations are well suited to running the Wikimedia fundraising
campaigns rather than a global organisation: if WMIT
to
come up with a solution that works to accommodate both groups.
Risker/Anne
On 20 August 2015 at 01:19, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, Andrew is right. Navigation is a very important focus point of
organising every Wiki Loves Monuments.
The complexity of the navigation
significantly elevated levels of protection above
'all administrators on Project ABC', although they may call for another
level of protection that can be customizable to allowing a much smaller
group or specific individuals to be the only editors.
Risker/Anne
On 11 August 2015 at 16:43, Romaine Wiki
, and Superprotect is probably the prettied-up
interface so others can do it), and if there's a problem that serious it is
going to ahve to remain in a broader range of hands.
Risker/Anne
On 11 August 2015 at 17:27, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the time, admins behave as we would hope
Who said the problem was on enwiki?
On 11 August 2015 at 17:58, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
There are situations where not even the administrators of a particular
community should be allowed to edit a page
On 11 August 2015 at 18:05, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Who said the problem was on enwiki?
If you think this issue is only a problem in some specific place or class
of wikis, then say so. Otherwise, I would
addressed within the
relevant community, or (as in this case) are not being discussed in the
relevant community at all, is not really appropriate, and I for one would
appreciate if you'd stop doing that.
Risker/Anne
On 26 July 2015 at 17:45, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Pinging WMF Legal
,
and I wonder about other geographically large countries where this would
also be more workable.
Risker
On 28 June 2015 at 01:17, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
I infer that you would have preferred a single US chapter from the start,
wouldn't you?
Il 28/06/2015 06:08
other countries, especially those with a large number of
Wikimedians or a massive geographic area, might wish they had gone with
regional affiliates rather than a national one.
Risker/Anne
On 27 June 2015 at 23:26, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
I know the confederated approach may
know them today...)
Risker/Anne
On 22 June 2015 at 13:41, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Magnus pointed the way forward when he started MediaWiki. When you look
into the whole stack of his data related tools, you will find how they make
aggregating data a whole lot
articles thinking the same way. Who knows, this might actually sell...
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
would be making more difference than being on the FDC would
have. I think there's a fair amount of truth in that.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
diversity, but very poor at implementing it.
Risker/Anne
On 6 June 2015 at 13:55, MF-Warburg mfwarb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I still think it was a big mistake (of the electcom? I don't remember, but
/someone/ pushed it through without discussions) in the 2013 election to
abolish the Schulze
On 3 June 2015 at 19:11, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a
public
list of voters who
Minor correction: Appeals are due JUNE 8, 2015, not July 8.[1]
Risker/Anne
(Member of the FDC)
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Information#Calendar
On 1 June 2015 at 11:18, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote:
Hello Wikimedians,
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC
Chen20471018752.17%
FDC Ombudsman ElectionCandidateSupportNeutralOpposeSupport Ratio
S/S+OUser:Kirill Lokshin - Kirill Lokshin37062710478.06%User:NickK - Mykola
Kozlenko33366110775.68%
Risker
On 15 May 2015 at 19:48, Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On behalf of the 2015
is extensive and my
gratitude is with you all.
Congratulations and thank you to you, Keegan, and to all who have worked on
this project over successive years. Here's hoping the process goes smoothly!
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
it unreadable for me, a person with fairly normal
vision. The Commons page should probably also have a link to the Meta
page.
Risker/Anne
On 2 April 2015 at 16:35, Jan Ainali jan.ain...@wikimedia.se wrote:
Risker: For your convenience:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ainali/sandbox
looking forward to reading this.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
).
I agree, pretty much. This is probably the best 'big picture look at the
WMF I have seen: accomplishments, plans, honest assessments of
challenges. Thanks very much!
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
March 19. You have no reason to believe that the draft report hasn't been
completed. Perhaps you could hold your concerns about deadlines being
missed until the final report is due.
Risker/Anne
On 1 March 2015 at 21:06, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Keegan,
May I point out that the term
departments have
Chiefs and the other focus departments have VPs?The organizational
chart is getting a bit tricky to follow. :-)
Risker/Anne
On 19 February 2015 at 17:15, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Wikimedians,
Among the WMF’s top priorities for 2015 is strengthening
, and for doing all the
legwork to produce the report. It's a much more interesting metric than a
lot of others that get collected! Perhaps colleagues on other projects
might want to borrow the script and see the results there.
I'll admit to sharing Rich's curiosity about who was most thanked.
Risker
for future needs of the
organization and movement, including the possibility of adjustments in
fundraising methods as appropriate.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/2014-11-21#Executive_Update_from_Fundraising
___
Wikimedia
of those banners, and they
were doing it long after the goal had been reached.
I'd say I was speechless, but actually I am working extremely hard to hold
my tongue here, awaiting an explanation for this. And yes, I think the
Wikimedia community deserves to know why this happened.
Risker/Anne
, or a single objection I've
seen raised, that wasn't about how unnecessary it is to focus on women. I
don't think we've ever heard that about the global south, or non-European
languages, or a lot of other areas where there are acknowledged biases.
Risker/Anne
On 8 January 2015 at 02:07, mcc99 mc
?
Risker/Anne
On 3 January 2015 at 13:35, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote:
For everyone here: I've asked our Grantmaking team to comment and clarify
the details of this plan.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
wrote:
Answering to Teemu and Chris:
I
that for me (Canada, using an old IE browser). However, it
IS ignoring my previously set don't show me this again cookie.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
already - the more annoying they get, the more
people block them, and the smaller the potential contribution pool. We're
starting to chase our own tails here.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki
Fae, Steven hasn't been a WMFstaffer for some months. Luis is, but he
appears to be speaking in his staff role.
Risker/Anne
On 11 December 2014 at 13:14, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Making defamatory comments about Commons volunteers on this list is
not terribly productive, nor a very nice
in the past, and it wasn't just because
certain chapters were having governance issues.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
than the version we saw just under a week ago.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
information was required than is needed for any other means of payment that
I've ever used. Banks in Canada regularly call their customers for
transactions under $5 because fraud is so common - and that is with chip
cards and PINs.
Risker
On 1 December 2014 at 00:08, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs
,
it will be difficult if not impossible for many users (particularly if they
don't have administrator permissions for the site) to lift the
filter/block. Getting donations is not more important than keeping the
sites accessible.
Please reconsider.
Risker/Anne
On 26 November 2014 at 15:33, MZMcBride z
.
Risker/Anne
On 26 November 2014 at 15:06, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
Lodewijk when the funding process stifles innovation and, it does by
design. The process is suboptimal. When the argument is made that the
chapters are second class citizens BECAUSE they are foced
Actually, as I recall, email alerts for changes in articles has never been
activated on English Wikipedia.
Risker/Anne
On 12 November 2014 22:53, Anthony Cole ahcole...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree with all that, Svetlana - though we don't have a button at the top of
articles making it easy
Very exciting news.
Risker/Anne
On 5 November 2014 14:19, Pierre-Selim ps.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Kudos \o/ and keep on the good work!
Pierre-Selim
Message d'origine
De: Lydia Pintscher
Envoyé: mercredi 5 novembre 2014 19:09
À: Wikimedia Mailing List
Répondre à: Wikimedia Mailing List
Thanks very much for developing this Fae, it's a great idea.
Risker/Anne
On 17 October 2014 03:37, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to recent vandalism a new report on Commons for page patrollers
has been started at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:F%C3%A6/BLP_overwrites.
This page
On 7 October 2014 00:57, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
IMO the election must be run by a third party, as happened prior to
2013, by SPI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_in_the_Public_Interest
, or shouldn't have been allowed to vote using a staff account, when
that was in the eligibility criteria for many previous elections (not just
the 2013 one) is just rude. As best I can tell, there were no concerns
expressed in the lead-up the 2013 election about WMF staff having franchise.
Risker/Anne
On 6
to strike were test
votes.[1]
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013/Results
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
that questions relevant to the responsibility of the team will receive a
response.
Risker/Anne
On 5 October 2014 14:13, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tilman,
Thanks for redirecting the thanks to Anna and Maria.
Erik mentioned quarterly reviews accounting for community feedback
be posting are not included
in the SUL grouping (for example, FDC wiki or other non-public wikis,
Foundation wiki, etc).
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
* standards:
formatting, manual of style, reliable sources as references (as opposed to,
say, blogs). It doesn't contain most of the elements of peer review seen
for scientific papers.
Risker/Anne
On 3 October 2014 15:56, Erlend Bjørtvedt erl...@wikimedia.no wrote:
But remember: all Wikipedia
content network, and was
responsible for all web, platform, and mobile engineering, security,
IT operations, support, and QA efforts.»)
Welcome Damon!
I am admittedly amongst the lazy, so thanks, Cristian.
Welcome, Damon.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l
, and wonder why editors at your project think that the current
level of participation is too low. I also don't understand why you find
your watchlist flooded using the current discussion process, but this may
be a difference in preferences or in the setup of your specific project.
Risker/Anne
not that. Wikimedia Affiliates Conference will do fine.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 15:12, Ilario Valdelli valde...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11.09.2014 20:48, Isarra Yos wrote:
I'm part of the Wikimedia movement, but there are no chapters nearby, nor
are there any user groups that I know of relevant to my
for Wikimedia (as a whole) nor for Meta. It's for designated
members of affiliates/chapters. It's okay for it to be what it is. But
let's call it what it is.
It's not about the colour of the bikeshed. It's about calling a bikeshed a
community centre.
Risker/Anne
We do have a community centre. It's called Meta. It may not be a very
elegant one, and there are definitely parts that can be improved, but it's
our virtual community centre.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 19:54, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
But we don't even
, and with the hackathons, too. You're not losing anything by
changing the name: you're recognizing the specialty focus of the conference.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
be if we just turned on those email
messages today. Looks brilliant on paper, but reality is a different
thing.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
to participate on many of the
larger Wikimedia projects. There are lots of ways that we can make it
easier. The most obvious one is automatic signing of comments, and it is
something that we have technically been able to impose for years; sinebot
didn't come into existence in a vacuum.
Risker/Anne
On 8
contain their username or IP (a form of automatic signature), so
I'm not convinced that there's an expectation on the part of new users that
anything they write anywhere will automatically be signed.
Risker/Anne
On 8 September 2014 10:24, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 09/08/2014
their posts.
Indeed, Jon Davies' +1 in response to this post had a 588-character
signature line, presumably added to his mail client preferences.
Risker/Anne
On 8 September 2014 11:43, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
a) This discussion actually belongs to a talk page on Meta
because they find the *technology*
unappealing.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
. :-)
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
Flow and Visual
Editor - focusing on the difference between the new product and that it
was intended to replace, instead of ensuring that things that had to be
similar or identical were considered the first step of design.
Risker/Anne
On 6 September 2014 02:13, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
not be possible to come up with a product
that is actually useful on the projects we have to replace the discussion
system we have. It seems that the Flow team has assembled the ingredients
to make a chocolate cake with the hope that it will be a suitable
replacement for vegetable stew.
Risker/Anne
On 5
in to the necessity to introduce a WYSIWYG editing
interface (that would be VisualEditor), and to recognize that wikitext
editing needs to remain in existence as well. Adding a third one whose
primary purpose will be to talk about the content being created using the
other two is counterintuitive at best.
Risker
A gmail address?
I am sure if you ask nicely the committee can be granted a wikimedia.org
email address through Mailman that will allow more than one person to
handle applications. It could probably be done pretty quickly.
Risker/Anne
On 4 September 2014 14:35, Carlos M. Colina ma
not entirely clear why this isn't happening
onwiki, but I suppose there may be a reason for that which doesn't come
through in the original email.
Risker/Anne
On 4 September 2014 15:34, Bence Damokos bdamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion, Anne!
As some background, the reason
Wasn't the creation of the DRAFT namespace at least in part a response to
concerns raised at ACTRIAL, in particular new, poorly developed articles
showing up in mainspace?
Risker/Anne
On 1 September 2014 19:08, Joe Decker joedec...@gmail.com wrote:
This, to the best of my knowledge
Given the mission is sharing information, I'd suggest that if we have a 95%
drop in readership, we're failing the mission. Donations are only a means
to an end.
Risker/Anne
On 24 August 2014 22:57, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
First, let's make one thing
and engineers work with on a daily basis do not permit edit
summaries, so adding what for many of us is an automatic and routine
comment is for some of them a rare and unusual event. (Perhaps they should
set their work account preferences to be reminded to include an edit
summary?)
Risker/Anne
of meta data tab from
articles. The current format isn't sustainable, though.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On 21 August 2014 09:18, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 21.08.2014 14:26, Risker wrote:
On 21 August 2014 05:31, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I went to look at some of those same articles using my smartphone with the
desktop option turned on. Many of them
\2014224\E0091608.TIF
President: Scott Perry
Vice President: Ann Perry
Secretary: Danielle Lewis
Someone else can figure out how to copy/paste.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
On 18 August 2014 03:53, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker, some replies below:
snip
As I stated in my response, although the WMF failed to predict that this
would be a hot issue, I predicted it clearly in February, and so did
another longtime community member. (If anybody
a functionality I'd like to
have. It is unreasonable to hold a comparatively very small organization
to a standard that can't even be met by IT giants.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
On 17 August 2014 20:25, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, hold on here.
On 17 August 2014 19:55, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is also a problem to look at this in terms of bugs
) - but
when discussing a global project or process or software, the best place to
discuss is rarely going to be a single page on a single non-global project.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
.
Risker/Anne
On 2 August 2014 23:27, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
Re:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/aug/02/wikipedia-page-google-link-hidden-right-to-be-forgotten
If Google disappearing a Wikipedia article is a notable news event,
wouldn't that meet the Wikipedia notability
that it is a Wikipedia article that is
hidden.
Risker/Anne
On 3 August 2014 00:12, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2014 23:49, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure you're correct about what is being disappeared, Fae. I
believe that the Guardian is referring to an article
of checklist or
guidance document on how to deal with these sorts of issues. In this
particular case, it had the added element of affecting readers possibly
even more so than editors, so some thoughts on how to involve
readers in discussions that affect their usage of the site would be good.
Risker
with John Vandenberg's comments that a clear roadmap and prioritized
list of next steps is probably required for MediaViewer.
Risker/Anne
On 11 July 2014 00:56, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't want to do small opt-in trials, release software in a fully
production-ready
There's a easy, clearly accessible, one-click option for disabling
MediaViewer, Todd. Scroll to the bottom of the screen. Click disable.
Done - it automatically changes your preference.
Risker/Anne
On 11 July 2014 02:44, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Risker,
I'm actually
Actually, Trillium Corsage, I'd say that's a reason for banning you again.
It's a very serious allegation you're implying about a longstanding member
of our community.
Risker
On 11 July 2014 14:24, Trillium Corsage trillium2...@yandex.com wrote:
Hi Fae,
I was banned from the list by Austin
What project(s) are you working on?
Risker
On 3 July 2014 18:12, Leigh Thelmadatter osama...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am, at this moment, trying to give a workshop on Wikipedia to professors
and they are having their own user pages being speedily deleted by
Tarawa1943 and Taichi We have
Okay, that's enough, Trilliium. You've now made a personal attack against
an identifiable individual based on gossip and rumour.
Stop.
Risker
On 29 June 2014 10:18, Trillium Corsage trillium2...@yandex.com wrote:
Pine,
An analogous argument to the one you're making is: someone who intends
On 17 June 2014 12:56, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm so very disappointed in the Board and the WMF for this TOU amendment,
which was obviously written to quell concerns about English Wikipedia
the primary
target project couldn't come to consensus on a policy, everyone else gets
stuck with one designed for enwiki.
Risker
On 16 June 2014 13:58, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
WOW,
CAN SOMEONE WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO CLARIFY IF THIS WILL GET A
HEARING
On 16 June 2014 20:48, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Not quite sure what you're shouting about, Gerard. The amendment clearly
gives individual projects the right to have an alternative to this
particular
of this forum to start moderating your posts.
Just stop, Pete. And everyone else, please stop responding and let these
threads die.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
projects, but he was put in a
situation that was well outside his comfort level. Wikipedia, Wikimedia and
the conference itself were inaccurately portrayed by a media outlet. We
all know it happens all the time; it's why we look for multiple reliable
sources in our articles.
Risker
On 7 June 2014
an appropriate one
unless there is some specific reason to ask (e.g., accommodation
arrangements). Therefore, there is no accurate method to assess the number
of women who attended.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https
for the community to make a considered decision.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
On 3 June 2014 09:05, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 03:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because VE has repeatedly been mentioned in this list as something that
is improving and may help us with acquisition of editors and their
knowledge, I have started
On 3 June 2014 12:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 16:37, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, further to what I've said aboveI think that before having an
RFC,
we should seek community assistance to carry out a small-scale study so
that there is some
naturally base their opinions on their personal experiences from that very
early period.
Risker/Anne
On 3 June 2014 12:15, Edward Saperia e...@wikimanialondon.org wrote:
Sounds like your suggestion would be a perfect contribution to some kind of
community discussion to try and decide
,
including but not limited to women. And I think that it's pretty close to
being ready for hands-on use by those who are new to our projects, now that
it can handle pretty well most of the essential editing tasks. It's not
perfect, but it's getting there.
Risker/Anne
I'm still stuck on bylaws. Why is AffCom asking for bylaws?
Risker
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
Wil, the deletion log of the page in question is publicly visible. There
are no WMF employees who have deleted anything on that page, ever. This is
information you can check for yourself instead of relying on the words of
others.
Risker
On 28 May 2014 12:23, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote
, where you
have been invited. That would include questions about how to tell if
something has been deleted from a page, how to read page histories, or even
how to tell whether or not someone is WMF staff.
Risker
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mailing_lists
[2] https
of the 100 most powerful women:
http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/
That's a great start.
Risker
On 28 May 2014 08:58, Anna Torres a...@wikimedia.org.ar wrote:
+1
Great to hearing your experience. As being a new ED too (3 months now) I
can indentify myself with your experience
the kind of
behaviour that makes Wikimedia projects so unpleasant for women.
I've been trying very hard to keep an open mind about you, despite your
unwillingness to modify your behaviour or even try to work with the
Wikimedia community. But today, you went too far.
Risker
contribute to the projects for which she will be
imminently responsible for. That's sad beyond words.
Risker
On 28 May 2014 23:54, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Ah. You mean the edit that I didn't write, I didn't post to IRC, and
I've never actually seen.
Got it.
,Wil
On Wed, May 28, 2014
Wil, the links? They're harassment. If you don't understand that, you're
in no position to initiate a discussion about the subject.
Risker
On 29 May 2014 01:46, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Thanks, Risker. I think there are a few inaccuracies in there.
* I link to threads
there is some truth that its original form
more or less documented existing practice at the time.
Risker/Anne
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On 23 May 2014 13:09, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2014 13:05, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Is the following a full statement of Wikipedia's Child Protection
Policy, reflecting all responsibilities that the Wikipedia community
and the Wikimedia Foundation have taken
201 - 300 of 420 matches
Mail list logo
