At 2:30 PM -0800 12/20/07, CK wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/kevon/index.html
Could use a once over for this site. any suggestions are welcome.
CK
Hi CK,
A couple quick things:
- No alt text on the holder.gif image. (line 28)
- link rel=stylesheet href=c/core.css / needs a type
Hi there,
the first thing I noticed is the fact that the footer is always at the
bottom. This is fine however I would like to suggest something to improve
this a little.
Set a z-index of say 100 on the footer, so that the content flows underneath
rather than over the footer.
Cheers
Adam
On Dec
Sorry, I just checked again and see you have done that - the problem is the
video.
On Dec 21, 2007 8:30 AM, CK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/kevon/index.html
Could use a once over for this site. any suggestions are welcome.
CK
CK wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/kevon/index.html
Could use a once over for this site. any suggestions are welcome.
CK
Not bad. Just in need of a little more cross-browser testing. See IE 6.
Those among us who ignore those among you who consistently freeze the
fonts in IE 6 an IE
Hi,
How does CSS z-index and flash commingle, or does the solution rest
with scripting?
CK
On Dec 20, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Adam Martin wrote:
Sorry, I just checked again and see you have done that - the
problem is the video.
On Dec 21, 2007 8:30 AM, CK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read somewhere that the latest gen adobe external js script method for
flash embedding fixes a stacking bug when it comes to z-index. are you
using that method to embed?
CK wrote:
Hi,
How does CSS z-index and flash commingle, or does the solution rest
with scripting?
CK
On Dec 20,
hi
From a web typography stanpoint its nice and clean but somehow its not
as comfortable to read as it could be.
Maybe crank up the leading and possibly the font size as well. maybe
make the horizontal word count less. Maybe spend a bit of time styling
some heads and subhead to break up the
On Dec 21, 2007, at 7:30 AM, CK wrote:
http://working.bushidodeep.com/kevon/index.html
The footer (#header) that covers the scrollbar is quite disturbing.
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://emps.l-c-n.com
***
List
CK wrote:
Could use a site
check(http://working.bushidodeep.com/impress/ybf/index.html). Mostly
cross-browser display. Doing my best to migrate previous code and
client to Standards. Any suggestions for changes under-the-hood are
welcome. I would like to focus on text-resizing without
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that there
is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap.
Would you be able to post a link to the form in question?
Thanks
***
List
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :)
www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
: [WSG] Site check please
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check
our new
site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that
there is not enough room for the form
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:53:13 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group, check
our new
site for problems please? :) www.clickfind.com.au
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that
there is not enough room for the form
Taco Fleur wrote:
Sorry, I meant: Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group,
check our new site for problems please? :)
www.clickfind.com.au
It is a little difficult to read. The fonts scale well. The overall look
is nice. But color on color is sometimes a difficult trick
Thanks.
It is a little difficult to read.
Can you elaborate on the above?
The fonts scale well. The overall look is nice. But color on color is
sometimes a difficult trick to pull off.
Hozriontal overlap when fonts are scaled on this page:
http://testing.clickfind.com.au:777/browse.cfm
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:31:30 +1000, Taco Fleur wrote:
Without even trying to be obsessive compulsive I can report that there
is not enough room for the form labels on my end, so several of them wrap.
Would you be able to post a link to the form in question?
The link is the one you gave. I
Usability - Poor
One off the reasons is viewing your web gallery annoyed me. I had to
click through 3 pages to view the gallery and each time the flash too
a while to load.
- There is to much flash on the site that does not need to be there.
- Colors are poor
I could point out alo of things
Kenny Graham wrote:
Can the more obsessive compulsive members of the group check our new
site for problems please? :)
http://www.trademarkads.com
I fear for their welfare.
Best,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
On Nov 16, 2007, at 7:23 PM, Kenny Graham wrote:
I don't think the grey used nicely; give me an impression that it's
an advertising firm with very conservative, uncreative image. Content
area without bg color may looks cleaner.
Home page is the most important real estate for a site, I
I fear for their welfare.
Best,
~dL
--
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Me too. Personally I like seeing h1 tags have only text content in
them, and to at least have text content in them. Hey, are we in a
timewarp? I have an issue that a lot of the content is inaccurate (eg.
Ajax isn't
Rick Lecoat wrote:
I'm recreating a table-based site that I did a few years back,
rebuilding it (hopefully) to web standards and making it as accessible
as I can.
http://sandbox.sharkattack.co.uk/novaRebuild/working.html
Rick,
It is working far better than when you wrote for a check a
On 31/10/07 (14:19) David said:
Rick,
It is working far better than when you wrote for a check a week or so ago.
It is, imo, a little daunting to arrive on it at 116.5 dpi-- the font
start point (at which one might begin to scale the fonts) for the
content text is very tiny; and, the value
Rick Lecoat wrote:
[...] I'm not sure how to specify media types when most of my
stylesheets are referenced by @import rules from inside a single
stylesheet called import.css.
You can leave the @import without a media type, and use @media wrappers
around the entire set of relevant styles in
Rick Lecoat wrote:
On 31/10/07 (14:19) David said:
Rick,
It is working far better than when you wrote for a check a week or so ago.
If I assign a media type to import.css, will that propogate down to the
stylesheets that are imported within it?
Rick,
I see Georg Sortun has
Hi Rick,
I loaded up your page, facinated by your achievement for a semantic
structure, it looks good, however I'm getting validation errors for the
DOC type, the img tag and trimming empty on 2 span tags,
Did you get the same?
William
Rick Lecoat wrote:
Hi;
I'm recreating a
Looks good on my iPod!
Tom
On 30 Oct 2007, at 12:38, willdonovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Rick,
I loaded up your page, facinated by your achievement for a semantic
structure, it looks good, however I'm getting validation errors for
the DOC type, the img tag and trimming empty on
Rick,
the site looks good. visually i would maybe slow down your animated gif a
bit, or include the company name or slogan or something and have it stop
after going through once or maybe looping just a couple of times and fall to
rest on the name/slogan/whatever. it's a bit fast and i found the
On 30/10/07 (13:38) willdonovan said:
I loaded up your page, facinated by your achievement for a semantic
structure
'Fascinated' is one of those worryingly ambiguous terms... ;-)
it looks good, however I'm getting validation errors for the
DOC type, the img tag and trimming empty on 2 span
On 30/10/07 (14:09) JonMarc said:
Rick,
the site looks good. visually i would maybe slow down your animated gif a
bit, or include the company name or slogan or something and have it stop
after going through once or maybe looping just a couple of times and fall to
rest on the
Rick Lecoat wrote:
Hi;
I'm recreating a table-based site that I did a few years back,
rebuilding it (hopefully) to web standards and making it as accessible
as I can. Currently it's one static page and the links largely don't go
anywhere, but I would appreciate feedback from the list before I
http://www.phillipwrayracing.com
XHTML error - img tag has been opened but not closed add alt
attributes to those images.
Other than that nice!
Thanks,
Al
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Jermayn Parker wrote:
just wondering if people can have a quick look at the following website
for any major errors, suggestions etc
http://www.phillipwrayracing.com
It is a little slow to load. I regret that font-scaling drops the floats
and/or breaks the layout.
Best,
~dL
--
Hi Jermayn, I notice the left and right columns white background
colors (or image) are overlapping the 'g-background.jpg'.
You either need to may transparent color for left/right column or if
background images are used, use nee to make them narrower or maybe
add z-index properties.
Steve Olive wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 11:19:46 pm Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Parker, Simi (DPS) wrote:
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media
On Tue, 22 May 2007 11:19:46 pm Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Parker, Simi (DPS) wrote:
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would
Parker, Simi (DPS) wrote:
Hi everyone
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would
really appreciate your feedback and/or
On 5/22/07, Parker, Simi (DPS) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting service
and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration other than
Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would really
appreciate your feedback
Parker, Simi (DPS) wrote:
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player configuration
other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows Media player, I would
really appreciate your feedback and/or assistance. I would
On 22 May 2007, at 02:31:29, Parker, Simi ((DPS)) wrote:
Hi everyone
I am investigating some potential issues with our live broadcasting
service and if you use an O/S / browser / media player
configuration other than Windows / Internet Explorer / Windows
Media player, I would really
,
Kepler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Taco Fleur
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 12:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Hi Felix thanks for the effort.
A solution to the problem would
Taco Fleur wrote:
http://web-strategists.com:888
Could do with suitable 'min-width' and 'max-width'.
Not well prepared for regular 'minimum font size', or even for 'font
resizing' in IE/win.
Also, I get the off-screen text for the click here to start selling
in at the left side on really
http://web-strategists.com:888
You've got a transparent background-color set somewhere as all of the
white space on the sides of the content and under the footer is
currently browser default (mine is set to pink so I can see sites that
aren't defining background-colors!). This prob isn't much
http://web-strategists.com:888
Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp
-best
kvn
***
List
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
http://web-strategists.com:888
Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp
-best
kvn
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:
The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand with it. The content instead eventually hides as it passes
. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks real good with one exception which should be an easy fix:
The yellow bar. As you increase the text size, the yellow bar does not
expand
[I have a minimum font size set to prevent eyestrain.]
On 2007/05/16 12:51 (GMT+1000) Taco Fleur apparently typed:
Anyways; anyone interested in a site check?
http://web-strategists.com:888
I like it a lot above the yellow, but I don't like 3.5 word line lengths at
all. An unset background
font. You can't win in every situation ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 2:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco,
Everything looks
No, its perfectly fine, its exactly what I was asking for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 3:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread
Taco
Stuart,
I did as you suggested.
I now have another bi-lingual site to do and was wondering if there
is a way to mark up for languages (Italian/English) something like:
linome/name/li
span class perhaps? Seems like it would add a lot of bytes to the page.
The declared language on the
I ran my style sheets through the w3 validator and in the style sheet
that comes with ThickBox I got the following errors.
They seem to me to be CSS hacks that the author has used to solve
problems with different browsers.
Should I leave them, or fix them?
#TB_overlay
Parse Error -
In my primary style sheet I got 29 warnings like this:
Same colors for color and background-color in two contexts .month and h5
As there are no h5's with a .month class anywhere in the site, I
would assume I can just ignore these types of warnings, but it bugs
me that the style sheet does
Kenny,
Your cites should probably not be in their own paragraphs if the cite
can be styled directly.
I took the cites out of the paragraphs and the page did not pass w3
validation, I put them back in and it did.
Bob
***
Philip,
It looks like the site may have problems displaying at widths of
less than
1000px in Opera 9 and Firefox. The backgrounds don't stay within
the three
columns properly, leaving some text unreadable. Probably an issue
with div
positioning, and the box model since the problem
Hi,
Since Bob was effectively asking for a peer review of his web design prior
to publication, I would have thought this was an entirely legitimate use
of this forum.
We can all learn new techniques from each other as part of this process,
with the result that we all increase the quality of our
Stuart,
Your menu has links with the same anchor text but different
destinations -
introduction, current and members. When you can see the menu
structure the context is obvious but when using a screen reader
this can
be confusing.
OK. I've fixed them all but one and I'm at a loss to how
Hi,
I think Dreamweaver is complaining about using the same link text to point
to different URLs not the other way round (It is OK to use different link
text to point to the same URL).
In your menu you have:
lia href=../rss/rss.html title=The FIFe RSS feed keeps you
informed.rss feed/a/li
The below sounds like a good way to discourage using this list.
Bruce P
bkdesign
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] site check - almost ready for prime time - IE weirdness
From: Bob Schwartz
OK. I've fixed them all but one and I'm at a loss to how to fix it.
Dreamweaver is complaining that I am using this more than once to
point to different URL's
Any thoughts?
Bob
Get rid of dreamweaver? ;)
Bruce P
bkdesign
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] site check - almost ready for prime time - IE
document: weirdness
You should also perhaps markup your logo H1 content as a change
from the
declared natural language of the page (English).
Thanks for you tips Stuart:
1. How do I do that?
2.I'm curious as to why you think it is necessary - it is the name
of the association - I doubt if Danone or Armani
Thanks Lyn,
During the planning for the site re-do we relied pretty heavily on a
year's worth of visitor stats in making decisions.
One of the things our stats showed us was the very low percentage of
800 x 600 and below visitors we had, plus people were complaining
that the site was
During the planning for the site re-do we relied pretty heavily on a
year's worth of visitor stats in making decisions.
One of the things our stats showed us was the very low percentage of
800 x 600 and below visitors we had, plus people were complaining that
the site was looking too small,
Thanks Kenny,
I would appreciate it if
you guys could check it out for any errors or wrong practices
Most/every page has two h1's, and there should only be one per page.
Ideally, you should keep the h1 for the page title, but not for the
site title.
I've fixed these (not yet uploaded to
Nick,
As no screenreaders read title attributes by default (and no
screenreader user ever changes the default setting, apparently) you
aren't really deriving any benefit (at least in accessibility
terms) from the title attributes, so they might as well go.
They were originally put there
Stuart,
Your menu has links with the same anchor text but different
destinations -
introduction, current and members. When you can see the menu
structure the context is obvious but when using a screen reader
this can
This is a real head-scratcher.
I'm having trouble finding other words
Rob,
The navigation is dependent on javascript for the flyouts which not
only
do the flyouts cease to work when js is turned off they also become
dead
links leaving only a partial working menu.
What browser - OS are you using?
In everything I've checked it in, the links are not dead with
meta name=author content=Penny Bydlinski Bob Schwartz /
The '' should be escaped as amp;
You can see that you've only got one 'warning' and that's it! http://
tinyurl.com/2m4pey
Em 2007/03/20, às 18:46, Bob Schwartz escreveu:
In the test site I put up the other day for scrutiny http:///
An try to use http://www.sidar.org/hera/ (you can choose you're
language) to check your site
And you're site has 1 error for the Priority 3: Keyboard shortcuts:
No keyboard shortcuts provided.
Em 2007/03/20, às 18:46, Bob Schwartz escreveu:
In the test site I put up the other day for
On Tue, March 20, 2007 11:56 am, Bob Schwartz wrote:
You should also perhaps markup your logo H1 content as a change
from the
declared natural language of the page (English).
Thanks for you tips Stuart:
1. How do I do that?
2.I'm curious as to why you think it is necessary - it is the
OK, you convinced me.
Your reason for doing so is far more valid than my lame reasoning
with the Danone and Armani examples.
Thanks.
On Tue, March 20, 2007 11:56 am, Bob Schwartz wrote:
You should also perhaps markup your logo H1 content as a change
from the
declared natural language of
Looks pretty strong.
*Joseph R. B. Taylor*
Sites by Joe, LLC
/Custom Web Design Development/
Phone: (609) 335-3076
www.sitesbyjoe.com http://www.sitesbyjoe.com
Bob Schwartz wrote:
The test site at
http://www.fotografics.it/fife/
has been refurbished to make it more standards compliant,
I would appreciate it if
you guys could check it out for any errors or wrong practices
Most/every page has two h1's, and there should only be one per page.
Ideally, you should keep the h1 for the page title, but not for the
site title.
Your cites should probably not be in their own paragraphs
On 19 Mar 2007, at 14:42:38, Bob Schwartz wrote:
The test site at
http://www.fotografics.it/fife/
has been refurbished to make it more standards compliant,
before moving on to the accessibility layer I would appreciate it
if you guys could check it out for any errors or wrong practices
On 3/19/07, Kenny Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some may also say that having a splash screen page (a page with no
other navigation other than enter) is a bad practice, but I think
that's more a matter of personal preference.
Personally, I'd have links to the major sections of the site,
Hi,
From an WAI accessibility point of view:
Your menu has links with the same anchor text but different destinations -
introduction, current and members. When you can see the menu
structure the context is obvious but when using a screen reader this can
be confusing.
You should also perhaps
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Bob Schwartz wrote:
The test site at
http://www.fotografics.it/fife/
has been refurbished to make it more standards compliant,
before moving on to the accessibility layer I would appreciate it if you
guys could check it out for any errors or wrong practices
Bob,
Bob Schwartz wrote:
The test site at
http://www.fotografics.it/fife/
has been refurbished [...] I would appreciate it
if you guys could check it out for any errors or wrong practices
It looks like the site may have problems displaying at widths of less than
1000px in Opera 9 and Firefox. The
Bob - I was wondering about the width of the #wrappers- 980px/960px
which causes horizontal scrolling if viewed on a smaller screen
resolution such as 800 x 600. I have always tried to avoid horizontal
scolling sometimes with great difficulty - does it not matter so much
now that many people
Hey Dylan,
Great job on the site - it looks really good! I particularly like the way
you've added click to return home on your logo, a really nice touch.
Only criticism I would say is not to do with the standards or anything, but
I'd give a rough idea of how long it takes you to build each
Dylan Lindgren wrote:
If I could get you guys to have a look at the website
www.lagunadesigns.com.au it would be greatly appreciated.
Dylan Lindgren
Dylan,
I think you are off to a good start. The w3c markup validation service
will point to the same few errors on all pages. It is important
Sorry, all the pages were validating correctly half a week ago, but I made a
few changes since then. I've fixed this up, and all the pages now validate
to XHTML strict.
I will have a look at the text scaling and IE6 issue.
Thanks for your help guys.
d.
On 3/7/07, ~davidLaakso [EMAIL
On 3/7/07, Dylan Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
...
If I could get you guys to have a look at the website
www.lagunadesigns.com.au it would be greatly appreciated. I am going to list
this on Google AdWords under a few keywords once I'm completely happy with
it. I tried to go for
1. Text of validation errors sometimes overlaps 'error' icon2. When email address and confirm email address fields have invalid entries, error should be 'enter valid email format', not 'values must match'.3. If edentiti is targeting Australian market, I would validate state and postcode as well.
A quick scan with WebLight turned up a few problems, see the report
at http://www.illumit.com/reports/edentiti.html
The problem found on https://edentiti.com/about-partners has me baffled.
Here's the source:
Epicorp - a href=http://www.epicorp.com.au/www.epicorp.com.au//
a/p
On 3/2/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
A new site I recently developed the front-end for over the past few
months, called Edentiti [1], has just officially launched and I wanted
to get some feedback about the usability, accessibility and over
functionality in
On 02/03/06, Rob Mientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good, everything works. Just not sure about the logo and left
chunk of site. Why is that below the header bar? Is that just Safari
or was it a conscious decision? Please do explain.
Of course it was conscious, but I still don't get it.
On 3/2/06 10:31 AM, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] http://edentiti.com/
Took _minutes_ for the home page to display, and once it did, it still
wasn't finished loading things.
Mac OS 10.4.5 Safari 2.0.3
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Hopkins Programming wrote:
Why must I have javascript enabled for the site to be styled?
Um... You don't need to, although IE users without script enabled with
have a slightly degraded style (not totally unstyled) due to Dead
Edwards' IE7 script not working.
Which browser are you testing
Rob Mientjes wrote:
On 02/03/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
A new site I recently developed the front-end for over the past few
months, called Edentiti [1], has just officially launched and I wanted
to get some feedback...
Looks good, everything works. Just not sure
Hi Lachlan,
Just a design opinion...
The main area (#main) looks a little squeezed between the rather heavy
right and left sides. Maybe make the h2 bigger and make the intro below
strong. (It is, but double strong!!... I don't know if that's why it
doesn't come up as strong on my screen
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
[1] http://edentiti.com/
The layout can't cope with any degree of font-resizing in any browser,
which I think is a weak point.
In my testing, I can resize a substantial amount before seeing any
problems occur, and even then it's just slightly
Tom Livingston wrote:
On 3/2/06 10:31 AM, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] http://edentiti.com/
Took _minutes_ for the home page to display, and once it did, it still
wasn't finished loading things.
Mac OS 10.4.5 Safari 2.0.3
Really? Maybe the server can't cope with the load
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
It was decided by the designer and management that they wanted the logo
on the homepage to be slightly larger and more prominent as a branding
exercise, but to then move it up to the header, out of the way for all
the sub pages.
offtopic class=slightly
You may want to
Kim Kruse wrote:
Hi Lachlan,
Just a design opinion...
Ok, I'll pass it on to the designers.
The main area (#main) looks a little squeezed between the rather heavy
right and left sides. Maybe make the h2 bigger and
I know. It worked better when there was less introductory text on the
Lachlan,
It was the most semantically correct way I could find to markup the
different levels of importance. There's are other combinations of
nested em aswell (see the stylesheet).
OK. I just never seen it in use before.
I don't know if that's why it doesn't come up as strong on my
On 02/03/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was decided by the designer and management that they wanted the logo
on the homepage to be slightly larger and more prominent as a branding
exercise, but to then move it up to the header, out of the way for all
the sub pages.
Okay, fair
Hi Lachlan,
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
/Um... You don't need to, although IE users without script enabled
with have a slightly degraded style (not totally unstyled) due to Dead
Edwards' IE7 script not working. /
Oh dear. Will there be an obituary somewhere? :-)
Site looks great overall. Nice and
Firefox 1.07. The siute stayed unstyled despite 10 or so Ctrl+F5's.
--ZacharyOn 3/2/06, Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopkins Programming wrote: Why must I have _javascript_ enabled for the site to be styled?Um... You don't need to, although IE users without script enabled withhave a
1 - 100 of 475 matches
Mail list logo
