Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-12-01 Thread Gary Poster
On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Chris Withers wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Zope 2 depends on Zope 3, via Five. Zope 3 does not depend on Zope 2. A very good point, but one which makes me feel that Zope 2 shouldn't be merged in with Zope 3 ;-) Actually, yes, all of my points were made to that

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-30 Thread Chris Withers
Gary Poster wrote: Zope 2 depends on Zope 3, via Five. Zope 3 does not depend on Zope 2. A very good point, but one which makes me feel that Zope 2 shouldn't be merged in with Zope 3 ;-) Put differently, if we're merging in Zope 2 into the repository, then why not SchoolTool, or any of the

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-30 Thread Chris Withers
Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 24 November 2005 09:17, Jim Fulton wrote: Now (well, after the December release :), I think it's time to revisit what the core of Zope 3 is and how we manage the repository. There has been a trend to manage important components separately and link them in. I

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 24 November 2005 09:17, Jim Fulton wrote: > Now (well, after the December release :), I think it's time to revisit > what the core of Zope 3 is and how we manage the repository.  There has > been a trend to manage important components separately and link them in.  I > see this trend con

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 06:59:46PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Cool to hear you're giving Five related talks. Is there any description > of these available online? (not that it's likely I'll be able to attend > PyCon, but I'm very curious) http://wiki.python.org/moin/PyCon2006/Talks They're

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Paul Winkler wrote: On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:03:35PM +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: I'd love to participate in some sprints on these. Me too. PyCon Dallas 2006 is only 3 months away and would be a great opportunity for such sprints. There's nothing about Zope here yet: http://wi

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:03:35PM +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > I'd love to participate in some sprints on these. > > Me too. PyCon Dallas 2006 is only 3 months away and would be a great opportunity for such sprints. There's nothing about Zope here yet: http://wiki.python.org/moin

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Chris Withers
Julien Anguenot wrote: Some Zope3 developers don't care about Zope2 and this is fair enough in my point of view. Zope2 starts to get old and appears to be really a mess compared to Zope3 in *2005*, plus it's not such an attractive platform as it used to be couple of years ago. (Don't get me wrong

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Jim Fulton wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > >> Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: >> http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository > > > I love this idea! Ok. > But I think it's still a bit too early to pursue it. Perhaps

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:17:02 -0800, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some projects that I'd really like to see worked on soon: - Use a common publisher framework - Use a common security framework - Share common ZPT implementations Can I add "use a common datetime implementation"? ;) I

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Chris McDonough
On Nov 24, 2005, at 6:42 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 24 November 2005 01:39, Chris McDonough wrote: - There doesn't seem to be as much of a commitment in the Z3 community to backwards compatibility as there is for Z2. Notes like Stephan's last one where he says "I have made d

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jim Fulton
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I love this idea! But I think it's still a bit too early to pursue it. In the next release cycle, I want to, finally, r

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: [snip] I think you're mixing the notions of "community" and of "community of interests". I don't think that the goal is to merge communities, the goal is to make good software and not have different entities fight on framework technologies.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Chris McDonough wrote: On Nov 24, 2005, at 8:37 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: I recall a slightly different discussion I was involved in. I remember Zope 2 core developers worrying about the inclusion of Five in Zope 2.8; they were worried they'd need to maintain its codebase. I was one of

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Chris McDonough
On Nov 24, 2005, at 8:37 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: I recall a slightly different discussion I was involved in. I remember Zope 2 core developers worrying about the inclusion of Five in Zope 2.8; they were worried they'd need to maintain its codebase. I was one of these people. Since the

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote: Jens Vagelpohl wrote: ... People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3 doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just inert code that won't cause any change in your Zope2 development style. Hee hee. And they believed it? Do they

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jim Fulton
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: ... People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3 doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just inert code that won't cause any change in your Zope2 development style. Hee hee. And they believed it? Do they wanna buy a bridge

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 23 November 2005 10:16, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I am -1. If I could I would veto

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: [snip] I think you're mixing the notions of "community" and of "community of interests". I don't think that the goal is to merge communities, the goal is to make good software and not have different entities fight on framework technologies. It is to stir common *int

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Dominik Huber
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: I will always vote -1 on such a move. I just simply punishes all those early adopters of Zope 3 and throw it in their face. Great appreciation! You know I can turn this around and say that by focusing all development on Zope 3, t

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: [snip] It is a bit like this: the zope2 community wants the zope3 technology and zope3 wants the zope2 community. I like this analysis. :) I think the question about the technology should be treated as such on a technical level, by bridgin

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: [snip] It is a bit like this: the zope2 community wants the zope3 technology and zope3 wants the zope2 community. I like this analysis. :) I think the question about the technology should be treated as such on a technical level, by bridging the technical gap (Five,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 24 November 2005 01:39, Chris McDonough wrote: > - There doesn't seem to be as much of a commitment in the >   Z3 community to backwards compatibility as >   there is for Z2.  Notes like Stephan's last one where >   he says "I have made deep changes in the past that affect >   the entir

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Florent Guillaume
Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: At least no one is expecting to make such big changes by yourself. Being stubborn and refusing to do further contributions, be they large or small, isn't going to get us anywhere. The people who are so f

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository Some comments after reading this thread: This may very well be not the right time for this codebase merge to happen --

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Jean-Marc Orliaguet
Martijn Faassen wrote: ... Outside the Zope community Zope 3 doesn't have such a great image indeed. It's either ignored, or it's actively rejected. There is a lot of competition with other frameworks. Zope 3 is currently not doing particularly well in this competition, something we need to f

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Martijn Faassen
Julien Anguenot wrote: [snip] And what about the acceptance of Zope3 *outside* the Zope community ? Zope3 will look like more complicated and confusing doing a merge. People building on Zope 3 will presumably mostly be working with a Zope 3 release, which will not include Zope 2. So, they can

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-24 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Chris McDonough wrote: > I really, really appreciate Phil taking the time to propose this no > matter what happens. Chris, I won't bother you with a detailed answer (esp. to some points that were not quite correct about Zope 3 not caring about backward compat). I just wanted to say that I also r

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Chris McDonough
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 04:56 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > I think Martin Aspeli is not the only one who still has no clue on how to > move forward > beyond a certain Fivization of his Zope 2 products. If you do, then that's > great, but I > don't think everyone is in that fortunate si

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Benji York wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Really, *how* does it mess up the trunk? Half of the packages of Zope > > 2 are also in Zope 3 because they're either ZODB or Zope3-related > > anyway. Another quarter of the packages will go away within one year > > Perhaps that would be a m

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > At least no one is expecting to make such big changes by yourself. Being > > stubborn and refusing to do further contributions, be they large or small, > > isn't going to get us anywhere. The people wh

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Fred Drake
On 11/23/05, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using this group, we have about an 80-90% > -1 vote count. I'll weigh in with a -1 as well, for all the reasons cited by the other -1 voters on this issue. Zope 2 and Zope 3 are far too different at this point. The only way I see for conv

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 24. November 2005 07:09:00 +0100 "Morten W. Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We are not even getting bug reports. Likely because Zope 3 *just-works* :-) -aj pgpC8hG89OHHQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Z

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > At least no one is expecting to make such big changes by yourself. Being > stubborn and refusing to do further contributions, be they large or small, > isn't going to get us anywhere. The people who are so far backing up this >

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:57, Benji York wrote: > > not too long ago the Zope 3 repository was strongly advertised as a > > place for people to put their Zope3-related software so that it would > > be kept up to speed with refactorings and such. If that offer was for > > non-Zope-core softwar

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Benji York
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Really, *how* does it mess up the trunk? Half of the packages of Zope 2 are also in Zope 3 because they're either ZODB or Zope3-related anyway. Another quarter of the packages will go away within one year Perhaps that would be a more suitable time to consider su

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:05, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Stephan Richter wrote: > > > I totally disagree. I, as a Zope 3 developer, have to learn Zope 2 and > > > Five. > > > > What makes you think so? I, for one, have not the slightest clue of how > > zope.

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 21:48, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Note that I also understand your motivation on voting -1 quite well. > > Leaving everything as it is is simply the easier thing to do. For the > > moment... > > I will always vote -1 on such a move. I

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 24 November 2005 00:05, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Stephan Richter wrote: > > I totally disagree. I, as a Zope 3 developer, have to learn Zope 2 and > > Five. > > What makes you think so? I, for one, have not the slightest clue of how > zope.wfmc works. Still I'm able to contrib

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 23 November 2005 22:01, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > > Messing up Zope 3 is specifically not the intention of this proposal. It > > says so explicitly in the "Your questions answered" section. > > Though it is not your intend, the merge would in fact mess

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Stephan Richter wrote: > I totally disagree. I, as a Zope 3 developer, have to learn Zope 2 and Five. What makes you think so? I, for one, have not the slightest clue of how zope.wfmc works. Still I'm able to contribute to Zope 3, am I not? If I refactor something, I might even have to touch zop

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 22:01, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Messing up Zope 3 is specifically not the intention of this proposal. It > says so explicitly in the "Your questions answered" section. Though it is not your intend, the merge would in fact mess up the trunk, specifically fro

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Julien Anguenot wrote: > And what about the acceptance of Zope3 *outside* the Zope community ? > Zope3 will look like more complicated and confusing doing a merge. Why? The 'zope' namespace package is what Zope 3 is known as to outsiders and this will not be affected. > I understand your motivat

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 21:48, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Note that I also understand your motivation on voting -1 quite well. > Leaving everything as it is is simply the easier thing to do. For the > moment... I will always vote -1 on such a move. I just simply punishes all those ea

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 21:48, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > It raises the bar for Zope 3 developers a bit while lower the bar for Zope > 2 developers tremendously. I'm looking at the bigger picture and see it all > leans towards the positive, even for Zope 3 developers (joint efforts, m

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 22:14, Gary Poster wrote: > The question here is effectively whether all Zope 3 developers must   > become Zope 'Five' developers.  As you said, Zope 2 developers can   > choose to proceed essentially unaffected.  Zope 3 devs could not. Amen. Regards, Stephan -- Ste

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Julien Anguenot wrote: >> Some Zope3 developers don't care about Zope2 and this is fair enough in >> my point of view. Zope2 starts to get old and appears to be really a >> mess compared to Zope3 in *2005*, plus it's

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Gary Poster
While I don't agree with the +1 voters, I understand and appreciate their arguments. That said... On Nov 23, 2005, at 6:49 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3 doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just inert cod

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Julien Anguenot wrote: > Some Zope3 developers don't care about Zope2 and this is fair enough in > my point of view. Zope2 starts to get old and appears to be really a > mess compared to Zope3 in *2005*, plus it's not such an attractive > platform as it used to be couple of years ago. (Don't get me

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Dominik Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Stephan Richter wrote: > > > This may raise the contribution bar too high. > > IMO that 's the most important point. It raises the bar for Zope 3 developers a bit while lower the bar for Zope 2 developers tremendously. I'm looking at the bigger picture and see

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Gary Poster wrote: > > Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: > > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ > > ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository > > I already spoke with Philipp on IRC about this, but for the record, > and speaking personally, and very arguably selfishly

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 18:49, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > People keep telling Zope2 developers that the inclusion of Zope3   > doesn't mean you have to touch it, if you don't use it it is just   > inert code that won't cause any change in your Zope2 development   > style. Ok, I accept that, no p

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Dominik Huber
Stephan Richter wrote: This may raise the contribution bar too high. IMO that 's the most important point. I' m -1, too. Regards, Dominik begin:vcard fn:Dominik Huber n:Huber;Dominik email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:++41 56 534 77 30 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Julien Anguenot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository > I'm -1 on this as well. Some Zope3 developers don't care about Zope2 a

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Martijn Faassen
Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 23 November 2005 10:16, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I am -1. If I could I would veto this proposal. Here is why

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 10:16, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: > http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I am -1. If I could I would veto this proposal. Here is why: To be totally honest,

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Gary Poster
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository I already spoke with Philipp on IRC about this, but for the record, and speaking pers

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Martijn Faassen
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository Indeed this is madness I think I like. :) This sounds like a sensible step to make after the Zope 2.9/Zope 3.2 release.

[Zope3-dev] RFC: Reunite Zope 2 and Zope 3 in the source code repository

2005-11-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Sounds crazy, I know. But I'm serious. Looking for your comments at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/ReuniteZope2AndZope3InTheSourceCodeRepository Philipp ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/arch