Nicholas Wieland wrote:
First of all thanks everyone for the help, I've resolved my problems one
after the other thanks to the suggestions I've found here.
Now I'm rewriting urls by substituting the href attribute with custom
data, and everything works fine.
What I'd like is having an url
Thomas Adams wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a newbie to Zope, using version 2.7.3 (okay it is not the newest one)
and I want to know if there is something
like a MVC approach available for Zope, i.e. Model-View-Controller
approach, as it is for instance in Java with the Struts framework from
Apache.
Hello all,
[Sorry for the cross-post, please CC replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] only.]
two months ago, I started an initiative [1] to translate Zope 3.1 using
Ubuntu's Launchpad system [2]. Since then, I've received a lot of emails
from numerous volunteers around the world and many of them made
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I agree that is should be replaced but I also mentioned that we tried
to achieve that already some years ago and we gave upso talking
about deprecation really makes sense when someone puts a replacement
module on the table. I know that the
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
| 2. If we find it's possible, we rid the current DateTime implementation
| and recreate the DateTime class by subclassing datetime.datetime. For
| backwards compatability, we make sure that old pickles can
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Datetimes are dull values, they should just pickle nicely.
They do.
Yes, that's my point. That's why we don't need added persistency.
A module with extra utilities + timezone support would be nice.
pytz provides some extensive timezone support. Not sure what the extra
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I think we need Zope to use some frankendatetime (a datetime.datetime
that also supports the old DateTime API) throughout the deprecation
period. Whenever people make a call to the old DateTime API on a
frankendatetime object, they'll
Lennart Regebro wrote:
I agree, official deprecation and warnings should only happen when we
have a real backwards compatibility and transition-path. Which would
include what you call a frankendatetime. :-)
Which, as I understand it, is what Jürgen Herrman wanted to create...
Not if I
I'm happy to announce that I've finally managed to document the
internationalization (i18n) features that Five has brought to the Zope 2
world since version 1.1:
http://worldcookery.com/files/fivei18n
This short tutorial compares current Zope-2-based solutions to the i18n
problem with the Zope 3
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Stephan Richter ]--
| Hello everyone,
|
| With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
| development process and higher software quality guidelines. With the
adoption
| of Zope 3 technologies in the wider Zope
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
| Andrew Milton wrote:
| +---[ Stephan Richter ]--
| | Hello everyone,
| |
| | With the development of Zope 3, the Zope developers committed to a new
| | development process
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
|
| Handing over ownership to the ZF and therefore having signed a
| Contributor Agreement are the terms of the svn.zope.org repository, just
| like that code is to be made ZPL.
The license part is irrelevant
Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Philipp von Weitershausen ]--
|
| | * putting a project/package under the wings of the ZF ensures long-term
| | IP protection
|
| How? I think my death + 70 years is further away than the death of ZF, or
in
| fact the death of Zope
Duncan Booth wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Mark Gibson wrote:
I know zope makes a copy of Data.fs before packing. Is it possible to
specify a location other than zope/var to place that copy?
Actually, it makes a *new* file when packing, and then unlinks the old
file and re-links the copy
Chris Withers wrote:
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Actually, I am starting to think there should be a big notice on the
frontpage of the http://www.zope.org/Documentation/ section saying:
don't bother with this, just read the source
There's actually some merit to this, anyone mind if I implement?
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
What's going on here?? Which is which?
http://www.ikaaro.org/localizer
or
http://www.j-david.net/software/localizer/
They're both zope products and both with the same name.
Perhaps the author of the deprecated page could put a redirect or
something to the new one.
Do
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
But how do you use it? I installed Five 1.2.6
In my product's directory I created a configure.zcml that looks like this::
configure xmlns=http://namespaces.zope.org/zope;
xmlns:browser=http://namespaces.zope.org/browser;
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 9/5/06, Maciej Wisniowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Zope 2.9.4 with Five1.4 (linux box).
I'm trying to use DateDisplayWidget (from
/zope/app/form/browser/textwidgets.py)
[snip]
So is this something with my Zope that I don't have request.locale
or is that a
Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
DateDisplayWidget expects an IBrowserRequest. Zope 2's request only
pretends to be an IBrowserRequest. At the current state, it can't
implement the whole interface.
That's a known issue, but we can't do anything about it, at least not
in DateDisplayWidget (and
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-5 16:28 +0200:
Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
I consider this a feature request but not as a bug.
Ehm... I'm not sure whether we understand each other.
I mean the bug
There is no bug.
Seems a funny interpretation of no bug for me
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-5 16:44 +0200:
...
It's an issue, not a bug.
According to Wikipedia:
A software bug is an error, flaw, mistake, failure, or fault in a
computer program that prevents it from working as intended, or
produces
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE isn't a variable. It's an HTTP header
(Accept-Language) that you really shouldn't modify. The request should
be treated as read-only.
To test languages, either write your own IUserPreferredLanguages adapter
that returns the language you want or simply
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-5 20:57 +0200:
...
Note that I'm well aware of this issue and have thought hard about it. I
think the only long term solution out of this mess is to get rid of the
__getattr__ spelling once and for all.
The __getattr__ may
Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
I'll call this an issue for now, but I won't argue semantics here.
All I can say is that the Five project's promises were never that
everything from Zope 3 works instantly. And it has also been Five's
policy to make a quick lie here and there just to get things
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Sep 2006, at 02:04, Fred Drake wrote:
On 9/5/06, Carlos de la Guardia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I frequently blog about Zope, and recently posted a list of 10
reasons why I
think Zope 3 is kind of invisible to the
Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Practically, it will very rarely hinder you to add attributes (such as
locale) to the request.
I think locale and debug are just common enough to be form variables.
Funny, I've never used either in 6 years of zoping ;-)
Me neither
Chris Withers wrote:
(Btw, just thought of another one possible name clash: 'response')
no-one uses that is Zope 2 land 'cos of RESPONSE...
Well. Could be that someone uses 'response' as a form variable, as in
the response to a question in a QandA system, perhaps.
The sad thing about this
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-9-7 15:08 +0200:
Chris Withers wrote:
(Btw, just thought of another one possible name clash: 'response')
no-one uses that is Zope 2 land 'cos of RESPONSE...
Well. Could be that someone uses 'response' as a form variable
David Bear wrote:
I wanted to assign a list object to a tal global variable but I can't
seem to find the correct syntax. I tried:
div tal:define=global mylist=['item1', 'item2']
tal:content=
blah
/div
div tal:define=mylist python:['item1', 'item2']
tal:content=mylist
This
Pascal Peregrina wrote:
I would like to know the right way to manage messages and store them in
ZODB with Zope2+Five or Zope3.
Currently, in Zope2, I use Localizer MessageCatalog objects.
Is there a new way already available through Five?
(note that I don’t want to use flat files for
Edward Pollard wrote:
Hi all,
I've got three subsites that formerly used three different templates. I'd
like for them now to use the same template, but I'd prefer not to have to
touch the thousands of pages of content that currently point in three
different places for their template.
The easy
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
Something I like about Zope3 is the View classes.
What I like about it especially is that it's a brilliant place for
putting in little extra silly python methods that are specific to your
template rather than the object class. Eg.
class ViewProduct(BrowserPage):
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I tried to use Zope3 events to get informed when requests start and end.
One of our modules (the interface module to jpype) requires such
a notification for reliable work. Therefore, it tried to register
the corresponding subscriptions on import of this module.
That is an
Chris Withers wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
If you are populating the CA before ZCML is fully parsed, then:
Why is the CA predicated on ZCML?!
It's not. And Stephan's Collect all registrations before executing
them! isn't actually necessary either (it's just necessary for conflict
Geoff Gerrietts wrote:
I have a couple questions about the current game plan for Zope
development that I was unable to answer for myself by searching through
mailing list archives and the zope.org http://zope.org website. I hope
my inability to answer them is not merely a symptom of poor
Geoff Gerrietts wrote:
[some paragraphs about scaling which I can't really comment on]
As for source control, I figure all of your code (DTML, yuck) is in the
ZODB. This went out of fashion a long time ago, most serious development
happens on the filesystem (in Python packages) which can
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote:
Here is my configure.zcml file, which is identical to the one Paul Everitt says
to write:
configure xmlns=http://namespaces.zope.org/browser;
page
name=hello
template=helloworld.html
michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
On trying to make a new zopeinstance from a Plone 2.5 instance created
using the unified installer I am getting the following error when I
attempt to run ./zopectl and start the instance.
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
NameError: name 'set' is not
Basil Shubin wrote:
Basil Shubin wrote:
Hi friends,
I want use zope.testbrowser for testing my sites, but before write it
as DocTest I want execute each statemnt interactively in python shell.
I don't know any way to see where it's works, what value it returns,
what error I can get and how
Derek Richardson wrote:
Zope 3.3
I want to add a viewlet to the rotterdam skin. I don't want to create my
own skin. is there an accepted way of doing this? I'm surprised that the
left sidebar in rotterdam doesn't appear to have a viewlet manager. I
have been unable to find any declarations
Sascha Welter wrote:
Yesterday evening I installed 2.10.3 for some tests with Zwiki (haven't
tried any of the other 2.10s). I noticed that the wiki logo wasn't
displayed. I think I narrowed it down to the default keyword in
tal:replace being treated like nothing.
My testcase (in a blank
In case anybody who's interested is not subscribed to zope-announce...
Original Message
Subject: Zope 3 training in Oslo with Philipp von Weitershausen
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:15:04 +0200
From: Andreas Johnsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bouvet is happy
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 8/7/07, Joachim Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes ZEO is involved, but where do I specify a Products-directory in
etc/zeo.conf ?
You can't, AFAICT. ZEO servers only support one Products directory in
their INSTANCE_HOME, it appears.
'Products' is just like any
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 19. August 2007 11:37:30 -0600 Sean Fulmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just read about the latest changes to MailHost:
http://blog.zopyx.com/blog_ajung/archive/2007/08/19/zopes-mailhost-overha
uled
I'm currently using MaildropHost to do async delivery and would like
Ross Patterson wrote:
Also, I can't seem to get the ReStructuredText in the long_description
on the pypi page to display as ReStructuredText instead of just
displaying as test. Anyone got any pointers?
I assume you're generating long_description from a README.txt file or
so. If you have
Gregory Dudek wrote:
A key factor is that from the zope.org web site it is not clear if the
community is healthy or not, and the general impression is that the
project is stalled since so many links are dead and defunct (and in fact
I am not so sure of the zope community health myself any
Tres Seaver wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 12:16 AM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also consider putting them in some kind
of collective-like SVN repository so that people can
make changes when they need to.
I think this is a great idea as it works
James Robertson wrote:
How do I upgrade Five (http://codespeak.net/z3/five/) from v1.3.8 to
v1.4.4 in Zope v2.9.7?
The Plone product I wish to install (Reflecto v1.2 -
http://plone.org/products/reflecto) apparentl. requires v1.4.1+.
Frustratingly, the installation page
Andreas Jung wrote:
Is there a complete documentation of the dtml-tree tag anywhere?
The dtml reference of the Zope book has the following for some options:
This attribute is for advanced usage only
Where can I find out about this 'advanced usage'?
Using DTML and related DTML tags is like
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Giampiero Benvenuti wrote at 2008-5-24 11:47 +0200:
...
after the upgrade from zope2.9.7 to 2.10.6 i get this error in the
event log:
2008-05-24T09:31:32 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog http://myurl/error_log/manage_main
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish,
On 2 Jun 2008, at 20:44 , Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2008-5-28 21:52 +0200:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
2008-05-24T09:31:32 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog http://myurl/error_log/manage_main
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish
Module
Marco Bizzarri wrote:
Hi all.
Apologies in advance if my question has a somewhat obvious answer.
I'm working on a Zope application, developed as a python product.
I've ZTC in place for this application. While I run all the ZTC, I can
see python process size growing. Can I use this as an
KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
I wonder why class constructor is never in apidoc ?
Because nobody has bothered to implement this feature. Patches are
welcome :)
Are there something in OOP concept I haven't understand ?
I don't know what you mean with this.
Jeff McNeil wrote:
That's not all that obvious to someone new to the Zope system. Most
of the documentation I've found is geared towards the 2.x branch. As
Zope 3 and Zope 2 are different animals, I wouldn't think that the
deployment steps and recommendations would be all that similar.
With
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:20:53PM -0400, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jeff McNeil wrote:
I'd love to be able to just drop an egg on the file system and tell
Zope Here, go load that one now via configuration alone.
You could also write your own ZCML directive
When relying on a third-party package with ZCML configuration, it is
sometimes desirable to disable certain directives, for instance when the
third-party package defines an event subscriber that you'd like to
disable. This is now possible with z3c.unconfigure.
While zope.configuration (the
Garito wrote:
Could someone point me where the page template code decide if an
expression is a path expression or a string or python one, please?
I'm studying the zope page template classes and I would like to
understand where this decision is taken
Garito wrote:
Use:
/path/to/the/object/with/${some/magic/variables}/to/solve/some/paths/in/a/simplest/way
Path expressions already support this.
tal:define=pathel some/magic/variables;
objpath/to/the/object/with/?pathel/to/solve/some/...
So basically in TALES path
Garito wrote:
Considere this case:
I have the sking value in the variable at args/Yanged/Skin
How can I do the equivalent to
args/Yanged/raiz/Skins/${args/Yanged/Skin}/arbolYanged.css/absolute_url
?
In the python way it will be:
path(path('string:' +
Garito wrote:
Finally it's possible to do what I need without the need to declare any
variable?
Not that I know of.
If not my change will be 4-6 lines of code and it's ok for me to make
this change
I only need to understand were the code decides if the expression is
standard, string
Thanks a lot for taking care of these issues, Andreas!
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 12. August 2008 16:05:47 +0200 Andreas Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 12. August 2008 14:16:44 +0200 Andreas Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*sigh*
I wished that both exploits were reported to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're contemplating the move of our Zope 2.x application to 64-bit Windows.
We rely on a few add-on packages, notably PyWin, which has 64-bit support for
Py 2.6 only.
I'd be grateful for a rough idea on when there could be a Zope 2.x release
working with Python 2.6
Encolpe Degoute wrote:
Dieter Maurer a écrit :
Garito wrote at 2008-10-8 14:22 +0200:
I'm agree with you, Tino. Plone has a lot of ugly features (as KSS, for
instance)
Why is KSS ugly?
Reading the documentation, I found it quite attractive
That is what KSS opponents atr thinking:
Five 1.0.1 released!
The Five team is happy to release Five 1.0.1, a bugfix release for
Five 1.0. The most important news is unicode support for add and edit
forms; other minor fixes are included as well. Please consult the
CHANGES_ for more details.
.. _CHANGES:
Hello all,
I'm happy to announce that a prose version of the Five for Plone
Developers tutorial is now available through the Appetizers section of
http://worldcookery.com. The text is based on a 90 minute tutorial I
gave at this year's Plone Conference in Vienna and introduces Five and
the Zope
be
nested). Thanks to Sidnei da Silva for the initial development back
in March, Lennart Regebro and Philipp von Weitershausen for bringing
it up to date for inclusion into Five 1.2.
* Improved event support
Five can now make standard Zope 2 containers (aka object managers)
send Zope 3
The Five team is happy to announce the release of two Five bugfix
releases, 1.2.4 and 1.3.5, as well as two Five betas, 1.4c and 1.5b
today.
What is Five
Five is a Zope 2 product that allows you to integrate Zope 3
technologies into Zope 2, today. Among others, it allows you to
Lovely Systems and Philipp von Weitershausen are happy to announce the
arrangement of a Lovely Zope 3 Training on 3 thru 6 Oct 2006 in
Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aimed at the Python web developer, this 4-day training will cover
every aspect of the Zope 3 application server you need to know
Hi all,
we're having a bugday for the Zope June releases this Thursday. Yes,
we know it's August. That's why we need YOUR help to get this release
out quickly.
How can you help? Look at the issue trackers at
http://www.zope.org/Collectors and search for bugs of the 'critical' or
'3.3 release'
Hi everyone,
thanks to everyone who participated in last week's bugday. A lot of
issues were worked on, but only a few were actually fixed. We managed to
release a set of new betas, though. To fix the remaining issues we're
having another bugday this Thursday.
How can you help?
* Download the
The Zope 3 development team is proud to announce Zope 3.3.0 rc1.
Zope 3 is the next major Zope release and has been written from scratch
based on the latest software design patterns and the experiences of Zope 2.
Cleanup of the Zope 3 packages has continued to ensure a flexible and
scalable
On behalf of the Zope 3 development team I'm proud to announce the final
Zope 3.3.0 release. There were no changes since the 3.3.0 release candidate.
Zope 3 is the next major Zope release and has been written from scratch
based on the latest software design patterns and the experiences of Zope
On behalf of the Zope 3 development team I have just released Zope
3.2.2, a bugfix release for the 3.2.x line.
Downloads
-
http://zope.org/Products/Zope3/3.2.2
Installation instructions for both Windows and Un*x/Linux are now
available in the top level README.txt file of the
The Five team is happy to announce the release of three Five stable
releases today! Many thanks to Rocky Burt for making those releases!
What is Five
Five is a Zope 2 product that allows you to integrate Zope 3
technologies into Zope 2, today. Among others, it allows you to use
I'm proud to announce that -- as the first Zope book ever -- my book
titled Web Component Development with Zope 3 has been released as a
second edition and is now available from online and local bookstores.
Like the first edition, the new book is targeted at all web developers
who want to get
On behalf of the Zope Foundation I'm happy to announce the release of
Zope 3.3.1, a bugfix release for the current stable 3.3.x line. Zope
3.3.1 contains a number of bugfixes, though most importantly it fixes
compatibility with Python 2.4.4.
You can find more information as well as a tarball
The Zope Foundation has been accepted as a mentoring organization in
this year's Google Summer of Code project. That means chosen students
who want to hack on one of the Zope projects (Zope 2, Zope 3, ZODB, CMF,
grok, ...) this coming summer will get paid USD 4,500 if they
successfully
zopeproject makes it easy to get started with a web application based on
Zope eggs, zc.buildout and WSGI/Paste. If you're not familiar with this
world yet, zopeproject is your easy entry to it. If you are, zopeproject
will save you lots of typing up the boilerplate.
Why eggs?
-
Because
Log message for revision 39740:
Move to Zope 3.2 in the externals. Packages that are new in this since
Zope X3 3.0 are:
- pytz
- zodbcode
- zope.deprecation
- zope.dottedname
- zope.formlib
- zope.index
- zope.testbrowser
Changed:
_U
Log message for revision 39741:
Let's try some zpkg integration. I'll probably fail miserably
Changed:
A Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/buildsupport/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/buildsupport
Log message for revision 39747:
Stab at building through zpkgutils. I don't really know what I'm doing,
though, so it doesn't work yet.
Changed:
A Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/
A Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2/
U
Log message for revision 39748:
Bring zdaemon external up to speed with the trunk
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/lib/python
Log message for revision 39749:
Don't let zpkgutils go on ZConfig cold turkey
Changed:
A Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/zpkg-support.pth
-=-
Added: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/zpkg-support.pth
Log message for revision 39750:
Of course the file has to be in buildsupport, not releases. Which again
proves my little knowledge of zpkgutils.
Changed:
A Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/buildsupport/zpkg-support.pth
D
Log message for revision 39751:
point setup.py to the right package location in zope 2.
And ... WOW. it works! Yay.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/setup.py
Log message for revision 39766:
Move the root PUBLICATION.cfg file to the release metadata
directory, overwriting the stub I copied from Zope 3.
Changed:
D Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/PUBLICATION.cfg
U
Log message for revision 39767:
Python 2.4 is required
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/configure
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/configure
===
---
Log message for revision 39771:
update zconfig to 2.3.1 for a zpkg-related case sensitivity fix
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/lib/python
Log message for revision 39813:
the skeleton dir is called differently in zope 2
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2/SETUP.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2/SETUP.cfg
Log message for revision 39814:
whitespace
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
===
---
Log message for revision 39810:
fix up the syntax of this thing.
also removed duplicate entry on docutils
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
Log message for revision 39817:
made the wrong one the module
Changed:
U Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/releases/Zope2.map
===
---
Log message for revision 39849:
Removing no longer needed branch
Changed:
D Zope/branches/philikon-zope32-integration/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
Log message for revision 40048:
use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some sort
of tag
available (e.g. a Zope 3.2 beta tag).
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python
Log message for revision 40126:
Only include *.py files for the scripts (in particular, DON'T include
the ZODBTools directory which was previously caught up in the '*' glob
and confused zpkgsetup).
Also include ZODBTools scripts (again, only *.py files).
Changed:
U
Log message for revision 40127:
Merge r40126 from the trunk:
Only include *.py files for the scripts (in particular, DON'T include
the ZODBTools directory which was previously caught up in the '*' glob
and confused zpkgsetup).
Also include ZODBTools scripts (again, only *.py
Log message for revision 40158:
Name the root collection simply Zope so that the name of the tarball will
be decent. This doesn't conflict with the collection representing the 'zope'
package because the *root* collection and a dependency of it never have to
coexist as sibling directories
Log message for revision 40159:
Merge r40158 from the trunk:
Name the root collection simply Zope so that the name of the tarball will
be decent. This doesn't conflict with the collection representing the
'zope'
package because the *root* collection and a dependency of it never
Log message for revision 40210:
Deprecated the ImageFile module for good. It will be removed in Zope 2.11.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_9-branch/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/Zope-2_9-branch/lib/python/ImageFile.py
U
Log message for revision 40211:
Merge r40210 from Zope 2.9 branch:
Deprecated the ImageFile module for good. It will be removed in Zope 2.11.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/ImageFile.py
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/OFSP/__init__.py
U
1 - 100 of 957 matches
Mail list logo
