Hi Christopher,
Great pointers, thank you very much for your response!
I use pound for load balancing (from the beginning - nothing changed here).
I will investigate using your indications.
Thanks again,
Dragos
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Christopher Lozinski <
lozin...@freerecruiting.com>
On 11/5/15 12:29 PM, Dragos Chirila wrote:
> My impression is that the save itself is handled by lets say client1
> and then the redirect and render of the edit page by a different one -
> client2.
I don't know what is going on, but let me ask a few obvious questions.
How do you assign web reque
Hi Sebastian,
Am 06.05.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Sebastian Tänzer:
> After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading
ZopeUndo to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
> PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any
problems using ZopeUndo 2.
After further testing I was able to sort this one out by downgrading ZopeUndo
to 2.12.0 (pip install ZopeUndo==2.12.0 --force —upgrade).
PyPi only said 4.0 brought Py3 compability. Should I expect any problems using
ZopeUndo 2.12 + ZEO/ZODB4/ZODB3 with their latest versions?
Best, Sebastian
> A
After more „research“ I see that the ZMS3 pip packages uses completely
different versions that don’t seem to be compatible with ZEO (at least Undo is
not working). I’m aware „undo“ is not a really used feature at all as revisions
most of the time are beeing implemented by products. My only fear
Good morning all,
after further testing we noticed our Zope2 virtualenv setup was done with the
ZMS3 (CMS) install routine using pip install ZMS3 --process-dependency-links.
This installed different package versions.
The original pip Zope2 uses these versions: http://pastebin.com/ZEwhVba0
The Z
thanks for the „shot“, yet disabling IPv6 locally on the VM does not help, same
error:
(server):
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (127.0.0.1:44833) disconnected
--
2015-05-06T10:05:51 INFO ZEO.zrpc.Connection('S') (127.0.0.1:44835) received
handshake 'Z3101'
--
2015-05-06T10:0
Am 6. Mai 2015 01:24:50 MESZ, schrieb "Sebastian Tänzer" :
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 WARNING ZEO.zrpc (19205) CW: error connecting to
>('::1', ): ECONNREFUSED
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 INFO ZEO.ClientStorage zeostorage Testing
>connection
>2015-05-06 01:16:46 INFO ZEO.zrpc.Connection('C') (127.0.0.1:999
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> The ZEO client cache is a disk-based cache, separate from the RAM-based
>> cache used by any ZODB connection. It doesn't use RAM, per se, except
>> for an in-memory inde
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 03:57 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
> > I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
> > right va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> What's the difference between the to cache-size settings here?
> I've not been able to find a good description to guide me in finding the
> right values.
>
>
> mount-point /
> cache-size 1 1.
>
>
+---[ Mikael Kermorgant ]--
| Hello,
|
| We're using a zope 2.10 setup with a zeo server and several zeo clients behind
| lvs.
|
| Sometimes, we'd like to track which zeo client handled teh request, and we're
| going to need it as we'd like to proove that ha-proxy handles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Analog Kid wrote:
> I have a zeo setup which has one zeo server (say s1) and 5 zeo clients (say
> c1 through c5). All of these clients share a single Data.fs. Now, I need a
> zeo server (say s2) between just some of the zeo clients (say c1 and c2).
>
Jean Jordaan wrote at 2008-8-13 12:26 +0700:
>We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
>CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
>
>Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests across them?
Usually, this would make sense wh
--On 13. August 2008 12:26:28 +0700 Jean Jordaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi there
We have a server running many ZEO clusters (many more than the number of
CPUs, of course). Each cluster consists of a master and two clients.
Would it make sense to run both clients and spread requests acr
--On 22. April 2008 15:16:55 -0700 David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn how to migration a single zope instance with m
David Bear schrieb:
I'm trying to find more documentation about all the configuration
parameters for a zeo.conf
I *believe* on plope.org there was an introduction to it with some more
parameters explained.
Namely, I have a zope with multiple zodb's and mount points. I am trying
to learn how
FuBuJo wrote at 2008-3-14 22:06 +:
> ...
>I thought putting Apache in front of Zope was very common (using VirtualHost
>Monster) - guess not.
This is common. But, usually, a ZEO client is not abbreviated as "ZEO".
"ZEO" usually means the ZEO server.
> ...
>It's the python process on the Zeo
FuBuJo schrieb:
> I apologize that my description was so confusing.
> I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
>
> The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
> Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
>
> Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the U
I apologize that my description was so confusing.
I appreciate the feedback and so would like to clarify.
The diagram is how the traffic flows. So we have:
Step 1 - a Load Balancer that passes traffic to Apache
Step 2 - Apache which uses mod_proxy to obfuscate the URL and proxies traffic to
the
Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-29 22:56 -0800:
> ...
>Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
>safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
>main Zope products directory are already available to the ZEO server
>without any special config
Bengt Giger wrote at 2007-4-10 15:36 +0200:
>with our new ZEO client systems, we frequently observe this problem:
>
>a ZEO process starts to use 100% CPU time (user) without a significant
>increase of requests. Sometimes (but not always) the process stops answering
>requests, still using 100% CPU.
cristopher pierson ewing, on 2007-01-23:
> I've been told that zope is not set up to utilize the extra processing
> power of multiproc machines. I have a new intel x-serve with the
> dual-core dual-proc setup, and want to get the most I can out of zope.
> I've read a few articles that mention r
- Original Message -
From: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on ea
Ola,
You can easily do this by changing the 'display' routines on each zope
instance
I feel so stupid asking but what do you mean by this...i have googled
but cannot find anything about 'zope display routines' ...
Do you mean this:
In the zope instances I can create a folder custom and place
> auaua...i didn't know that ;)...this is really cool. Now the
> inevitable question - 'Is there any documentation about how to set
> this up ?'
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/HowtoRunAZEOServer/howto.html
http://plope.com/Books/2_7Edition/ZEO.stx
and one more interesting thing:
http://longsleep.
- Original Message -
From: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Maciej Wisniowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
Ola,
thx maciej and
Ola,
thx maciej and Jonathan...your answers have helped a lot
Each zope instance can access multiple ZODB's (as Maciej mentions
later), which means that the zope instance can access both a shared zodb
and a local zodb which is specific to the zope instance.
auaua...i didn't know that ;)...thi
- Original Message -
From: "Maciej Wisniowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zeo question
2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
r
> 2. I can create a custom skin on each zope (in reality plone) instance
> right or is each zope instance is just a mirror of the other?
Nope. It is something different. In general ZEO is about sharing ZODB
(Zope Object Database) between few Zope instances. There is no mirroring
but just one ZODB.
I see references to asyncore.py near the end of the thread listing when
using DeadLockDebugger and seeing a stuck thread process. The tread
eventually clears out but sometimes an impatient user reloads, reloads,
reloads...and then all 4 threads are stuck on exact same thing. Then you
can see th
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:32:38AM +0200, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
>
> >
> >zope 2.8.5 + zeo
> >python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
> >Red Hat RHEL 4
> >Plone 2.1.2
> >
> >Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
> >problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and
zope 2.8.5 + zeo
python 2.3.4 (red hat distribution)
Red Hat RHEL 4
Plone 2.1.2
Our zeo clients hang intermittently. We have no way of reproducing the
problem, but it occurs daily. The client hangs and a restart seems to
fix the
problem.
Install DeadlockDebugger and you'll be able to see
Title: Re: [Zope] ZEO and Data.fs
No, you just need to change zope.conf to move from FileStorage to ClientStorage, and then you can move your Data.fs file to ZEO var directory and start zeo.
Pascal
De : "Sinang, Danny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date : Mon, 18 Sep 2006
--On 18. September 2006 21:38:48 +0800 "Sinang, Danny"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
We're currently not using ZEO, but may do so in the future.
Question is, do we need to export or convert our Data.fs to a
ZEO-capable format ?
No, just create a new ZEO instance and copy over the Dat
Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2006-9-14 15:50 +0200:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
>>>
>>> That's misleading wo
Brian Brinegar wrote at 2006-9-13 21:22 -0400:
> ... partioning large data sets onto different storages ...
>First off, does this make any sense?
I makes sense and we do it successfully with our large editorial
system.
However, ensure that each storage is self contained data wise:
e.g. do not
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[Zope] List Mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 15:34, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Vagelpohl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[Zope] List Mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 13:56, Jonathan wrote:
Yes: a single zeo server can deal with multiple storages (ie. a
storage can contain mount points to other storages)
That's misleading wording, a storage knows nothing at all about
mounts. The storage s
- Original Message -
From: "Martijn Pieters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Brian Brinegar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Sep 2006, at 08:54, Martijn Pieters wrote:
One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine. Transactions
involving multiple storages commit just fine.
Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
ZODBs when
On 9/14/06, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you mean having zope commit a single transaction to multiple storages,
then 'vanilla' zope won't do it (Zope Corp has a commercial product called
ZRS which does this type of thing).
No, that's not true. ZRS is used to create hot read-only or st
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Brinegar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO with Multiple Storages
We currently have a ZEO environment with FileStorage (data.fs) over 100
gigs, which continues to grow. Currently we are approach
--On 2. September 2006 12:15:47 -0400 beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
address 8100
and that your zeo server is running on the ip address specified in the
entry in zope.conf
That's logical. Why does zeo need its own port?
Because every kind of network service needs its own port.
-aj
Jonathan wrote:
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently, it needs its own port?
TIA,
beno
You need to make sure that the entry in your zeo client config file
(zope.conf)
eg
server 194.123.123.123:8100
- Original Message -
From: "beno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO Problem
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently,
I got this working by changing the following in zope.conf:
server localhost:7080
to
server 202.71.106.119:
Apparently, it needs its own port?
TIA,
beno
Jonathan wrote:
- Original Message - From: "beno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 9:24 AM
Subjec
- Original Message -
From: "beno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Zope] ZEO Problem
Hi;
I'm reading the Plone book. It states that for Zope 2.7 (I have 2.78) ZEO
is built in by default but must be instantiated thus:
cd /opt/Zope-2/7/bi
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-8 08:06 +0200:
> ... long time commit locks ...
>To understand this can you tell me when a transaction is started and when
>its closed. Does the Zeo server wait until all data is recieved bevor the
>transaction is started or does the transaktion start when the data
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:09:56PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
> > ...
> >2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
> >Transaction
> >+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
> > ...
> >2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO ZE
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-8-7 15:54 +0200:
> ...
>2006-08-07T14:29:19 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.23:52518)
>Transaction
>+blocked waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
> ...
>2006-08-07T14:29:50 INFO ZEO.StorageServer (97002/10.152.64.17:54463) Blocked
>transaction restarted.
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-3 08:20 +0200:
>On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
>> > ...
>> >I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
>> >and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Prox
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not possible,
period.
He's decribing the dead tree version of the Zope Book. Either Amos or
M
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:24:29PM +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
> > ...
> >I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
> >and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
> >at the backup site an
Gerhard Schmidt wrote at 2006-5-2 09:52 +0200:
> ...
>I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
>and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
>at the backup site an the ZEO at the main site.
You will gain nothing -- as ZEO does not impl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 May 2006, at 08:52, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I'd like to see that. The proxying you describe is simply not
possible, period.
As Andreas mentioned, the (commercial) ZRS pro
--On 2. Mai 2006 09:52:57 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A configuration like that is described in the Zope Book on page 230.
I can not see anything like that in the Zope Book 2.7 edition. As said
a ZEO client talks to a *ZEO server* and *not* to another *ZEO client*.
Any
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:51:12AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hallo,
> >
> >I am trying to install a setup like shown below
> >
> >ZEO_M
> > | -- ZEO_B
> > | | -- ZOPE
> > | | -- ZOPE
> > | | -- ZOP
--On 2. Mai 2006 08:31:17 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to install a setup like shown below
ZEO_M
| -- ZEO_B
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| | -- ZOPE
| ...
| -- ZOPE
| -- ZOPE
...
You are trying to create a cascade of multiple ZEO C
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
If I were in your shoes the first thing I'd do is bump up the log
levels
on both zope and zeo to BLATHER. Adds overhead I know, but you
need to find
the problem somehow... it's a weird one, I've never seen zope
restart "for no reason".
This
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:35:11AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
> Timing correlates to the second. Zope and ZEO live on the
> same physical box.
OK. Do you have more than one ZEO client? If not,
I'd reevaluate whether you need ZEO at all.
(It's great for zopectl debug on a live sys
Paul,
Thanks for the assist. Comments on your comments interlinearly below.
I have increased cache and other resources to see what the impact will be.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:00:45AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
> >
> > Zope 2.9.0
> >
> > We
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:00:45AM -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
>
> Zope 2.9.0
>
> We are seeing spontaneous restarts of Zope with no indication in any of
> the standard Zope logs. Looking at the ZEO log indicates that the
> restarts of Zope are due to a lost connection between Zope & ZEO but
Sascha
Ottolski
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:40 AM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO client authentication
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
> I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
> this is set in the zeo&#x
Mika, David P (Research) wrote:
I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that this
is set in the zeo's config file with the keys: authentication-protocol,
authentication-database and authentication-realm.
Further, I can see that a client can connect using e.g. ZEO.
Am Montag, 3. Oktober 2005 14:44 schrieb Mika, David P (Research):
> I see that ZEO supports a simple digest authenitcation of clients and that
> this is set in the zeo's config file with the keys:
> authentication-protocol, authentication-database and authentication-realm.
>
> Further, I can see t
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
> on your root filesystem)?
No I checked that. Nothing in /tmp (and that would have been listed by
lsof)
--
___
Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
on your root filesystem)?
-aj
--On 30. September 2005 14:06:16 +0200 Reinoud van Leeuwen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We have a ZEO setup with a Plone based intranet, and for some reason it
seems that Zope is filli
michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
Does anyone know if the 2.0.5 windows release of Plone includes ZEO?
Ask on a Plone list.
Is
there any configuration information on this?
Dunno what you mean.
Also does Zope 2.8 for linux
have ZEO as standard.
Yes.
Finally, if you don't run ZEO does this
[michael nt milne]
> ...
> Also does Zope 2.8 for linux have ZEO as standard.
All versions of Zope at and after 2.7 include ZEO, and regardless of
platform (Linux, Windows, Solaris, ..., doesn't matter).
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zo
michael nt milne wrote at 2005-8-24 11:52 +0100:
> Does anyone know if the 2.0.5 windows release of Plone includes ZEO?
Do you have installed it?
Then see whether the "Zope" part contains the folder "ZEO"
(usually in "lib/python"). If it does, then it contains "ZEO".
>Also does Zope 2.8 for lin
[Dieter Maurer]
> There is one essential thing you stress over and over again -- but
> which I am not sure:
>
> You say, the exception in "tearDown" means that
> the test completed successfully -- without any error.
Oh no, that's not what I'm saying. As you say next,
> However, I
Hi Tim,
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-19 11:15 -0400:
> ...
>"The tests are dodgy" sounds
>appealing until you think about what they do related to the point of
>failure: spawn a process, and wait for it to exit later, passing
>waitpid() the pid returned by spawnve(). There just isn't anything
>comp
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-18 17:16 -0400:
> ...
>I'm not sure Dieter's info is current either. The SIGCHLD handler in
>current Zope 2.7.7's zopectl.py explicitly catches and ignores the
>specific exception you reported:
Good!
Something like that I did for our Zope 2.7.2.
> ...
>But looks like
[Willi Langenberger]
>> Interesstingly, if i run the test with strace, i never see the test
>> fail (i tried at least 30 times):
[Jens Vagelpohl]
> This sounds like something Tim had mentioned at one point, where
> tests can fail on a machine that is "too fast"?
Dieter said that. I believe him,
[Willi Langenberger]
> Ok, here some data points...
>
> bender:~/Zope-2.7.7-final$ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.9-11.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.3 20050227
> (Red Hat 3.4.3-22)) #1 SMP Fri May 20 18:26:27 EDT 2005
>
> bender:~/Zope-2.7.7-final$ python2.3
> Python 2.3.5
On 19 Aug 2005, at 02:22, Willi Langenberger wrote:
According to
Interesstingly, if i run the test with strace, i never see the test
fail (i tried at least 30 times):
This sounds like something Tim had mentioned at one point, where
tests can fail on a machine that is "too fast"? Both with s
According to Tim Peters:
> I don't know. Dieter asked whether you ran the tests via "zopectl
> test", but I didn't see an answer to that.
Ok, here some data points...
bender:~/Zope-2.7.7-final$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.9-11.ELsmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.3 20050227
(
[Andreas Krasa]
> ...
> As I understood Dieter's mail, this strange behavior is caused by the
> way RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 system libraries handle SIG_IGN/SIGCHLD.
I don't know. Dieter asked whether you ran the tests via "zopectl
test", but I didn't see an answer to that. If you run the Zope
Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote at 2005-8-18 08:50 +0200:
> ...
>Btw. since this also happens on 5 other machines - all natively
>installed with RHEL4 - there actually might really be something wrong
>within the OS.
>
>Is that worth submitting a bug to RedHat? Or is ist more like a
>"feature"? ;)
The L
On 18 Aug 2005, at 11:00, Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote:
As I understood Dieter's mail, this strange behavior is caused by the
way RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 system libraries handle SIG_IGN/SIGCHLD.
That makes me wonder why it does not happen on my CentOS 4 box.
CentOS 4 is compiled from RHEL4 S
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
> On 18 Aug 2005, at 07:50, Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote:
>
>> Is that worth submitting a bug to RedHat? Or is ist more like a
>> "feature"? ;)
>
>
> Why would RedHat care? They will just throw it back at you and say
> "sorry, Zope is not one of our supported packages".
>
On 18 Aug 2005, at 07:50, Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote:
Is that worth submitting a bug to RedHat? Or is ist more like a
"feature"? ;)
Why would RedHat care? They will just throw it back at you and say
"sorry, Zope is not one of our supported packages".
By the way, I hope you are not running
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
> Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote at 2005-8-16 18:37 +0200:
>
>>...
>>==
>>ERROR: checkMultipleAddresses
>>(ZEO.tests.testConnection.MappingStorageConnectionTests)
>>--
Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote at 2005-8-16 18:37 +0200:
> ...
>==
>ERROR: checkMultipleAddresses
>(ZEO.tests.testConnection.MappingStorageConnectionTests)
>--
>Traceb
Tim Peters wrote at 2005-8-16 12:35 -0400:
> ...
>For example, on a slow or
>overburdened (with other simultaneous work) machine, some ZEO tests
>can fail due to not getting enough cycles soon enough.
My experience has been that ZEO tests fail with preference
on especially fast machines.
--
Diet
[Andreas Krasa]
So you showed a number of test errors here, all on line 121 of
ConnectionTests.py. They all seem indentical to the first one:
> ERROR: checkMultipleAddresses
> (ZEO.tests.testConnection.MappingStorageConnectionTests)
> -
On 16 Aug 2005, at 17:42, Andreas Krasa // WUW wrote:
Our system is a Intel Xeon 3 GHz Dual-CPU with 2.5 GB RAM running
RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 (SElinux disabled).
I just downloaded and ran all tests for Zope 2.7.7 on one of my
boxes, a CentOS 4 install (same as RHEL 4) with all the latest
Tim Peters schrieb:
> [Andreas Krasa]
>
>>We are encountering some really strange problems with Zope 2.7.7 on our
>>RedHat EL 4 Linux machines.
>>
>>During the Zope 2.7.7 compilation works - however most of the time "make
>>test" returns a random number of errors (somewhere between 20 and 30)
>>AL
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
>> During the Zope 2.7.7 compilation works - however most of the time "make
>> test" returns a random number of errors (somewhere between 20 and 30)
>> ALL related to ZEO.
>
>
> Maybe someone can help if you actually *tell us* what these errors are.
> At least my own cry
[Andreas Krasa]
> We are encountering some really strange problems with Zope 2.7.7 on our
> RedHat EL 4 Linux machines.
>
> During the Zope 2.7.7 compilation works - however most of the time "make
> test" returns a random number of errors (somewhere between 20 and 30)
> ALL related to ZEO.
>
> The
During the Zope 2.7.7 compilation works - however most of the time
"make
test" returns a random number of errors (somewhere between 20 and 30)
ALL related to ZEO.
Maybe someone can help if you actually *tell us* what these errors
are. At least my own crystal ball is in the shop for repairs r
[gabor]
> i understand that you need to use ZEO when running ZOPE on a multi-cpu
> machine (or when you want to cluster ZOPE).
>
> but from mails on this forum it seems that people are also using ZEO
> when they're running ZOPE on a single-cpu machine.
>
> why?
More here:
http://zope.org/Wik
h
Sent: 14 June 2005 10:46
To: gabor
Cc: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] ZEO recommended for single-cpu?
Typically it's because:
- Zope starts faster in a ZEO setup.
- You can use "zopectl debug" to get into a debugger session
without shutting down Zope first if you use ZEO.
Typically it's because:
- Zope starts faster in a ZEO setup.
- You can use "zopectl debug" to get into a debugger session
without shutting down Zope first if you use ZEO.
- C
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:03 +0200, gabor wrote:
> hi,
>
> i understand that you need to use ZEO when running ZOPE on
Drew Nichols wrote at 2005-6-6 18:02 +1000:
>Whenever I have zope running with a socket (as is the default for ZEO)
>my Sessions become unstable.
Unbelievable because:
1. Zope is always running with sockets (at least the HTTP socket)
2. We use ZEO and sessions without problems.
> ...
>The se
There are no known bugs in Zope itself after Zope 2.7.3 consistent with
what I *think* your observations are. There can be issues caused by not
repersisting mutable data, as Malcom described. But that said, I'm not
sure I understand what you mean when you say:
- "I have my zope running with a so
That seems to have been the problem. The ZopeProfiler version I was using
does not work with Zope2.7 although Dieter has a version (1.4) that works
with Zope2.7.3, I was not using it. I also suspect there may be a problem
with multiheaded Zope/ZEO configurations.
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Chris Mc
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
