Nothing I have seen reported, has *proven* Rossi has no technology now and
never had any. Maybe it is not as good as Rossi claims. Maybe even Rossi
is deceiving himself. Maybe Rossi has "guilded the lilly" - has
deceptively over reported his results. I don't believe Focardi was
deceived - I
The problem with the strategy presented by Smith/Edison is that the big
electric power utility companies have *already made the big investment in
distribution*. Smith describes a new installation. The technology for the
power management he describes is available today - you can go out and buy
it
Incentives and net metering were great... I say were. They are now largely
a thing of the past. When I lived in S. FL, I installed a grid-tie system
(5.4 kW rated) and was able to net 0 kWH for about 6 months out of the year
(3500 sq ft home with two high efficiency A/C units). I got incentives
You say the solution is obvious, but that is far from the case. If the
power companies charged everyone a flat fee for their share of the grid
maintenance and repayment of capital, I guarantee you that the bills of the
apartment dwellers would go way up. The power company makes money on each
kWH
of increased utility prices. Yay for rich people and their solar
> installations though, I guess.
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There is a residential solar power war going on now (see Scientific
>> American iss
There is a residential solar power war going on now (see Scientific
American issue 11/2014) between homeowners having rooftop solar panels and
the power companies. The power companies believe they have a right to
supply all of your power and are charging additional fees if you have
panels on your
After having read Dufour's paper, it appears that it is complete hypothesis
on the basis of the fact that the other forces seem to converge in
magnitude at a sub-nuclear scale - so why shouldn't gravitation? He
presents no apparent data that his hypothesis has any basis. Gravitation
would have
Russ, have you estimated the number of people that would have standing in
such a case against the USPTO? I think, to have standing, an inventor
would have had to make a LENR patent application that was rejected. They
may be later found to have been rejected for reasons other than LENR, but
rent would have to be flowing as a tube in the
direction of the axis of the pore - in which case, what is the current
flowing from and to?
Any thoughts on these?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
> Ø What
Hi Jones,
What you describe is certainly an interesting and scary proposition - that
protons could be sheared or broken apart. However, it is hard to imagine a
number of thing in this hypothesis and that of Olafssen/Holmlid. First of
all, where did the potential energy come from to put two
Another possibility is the conduction of alumina. Alan has measured the
electrical conductivity of alumina to increase rapidly above 900C. The
heater coils are wound directly on the mullite reactor tube and they are
covered with thick alumina tubes. When the outer cover alumina tube is
over
.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Tue, Apr 12, 2016 12:12 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Bob Hig
h an experiment over so long a period.
Jones, can you elaborate on Holmlid's call for replication?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
> Since the Rossi/IH announcements, Vortex-L has been deluged with useless
> and bor
Since the Rossi/IH announcements, Vortex-L has been deluged with useless
and boring posturing and insulting angry remarks. In a month we will all
wonder why we wasted so much of our collective time - like waving fans in
the vacuum of space to improve the convective cooling. Soon data will
emerge
ossi’s (and all
> pioneers of cold fusion) history has demonstrated is required and all their
> grousing about and poking at Rossi to reveal all is science at its worst
> but also sadly normal condition.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
> *Sen
It is amazing that there are so many lofty positions being taken on the
basis of little-to-no released data. If IH and Rossi each believe their
positions, then I say, "PUBLICLY RELEASE THE RAW DATA ALONG WITH OBSERVER
COMMENTS". Play chicken. See who objects to release of the data.
Let the
e...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
> Don't get me wrong, Tom Clarke did good forensic research and wrote a good
> paper. In Clarke's comment about the translucency, he states:
>
> "This error is impossible to quantify because it depends on the heater
&
gt; alumina emissivity. Thus the argument for high differential COP used by the
> Report as additional evidence falls and both the COP and differential COP
> are as expected for a system with no excess heat.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> As I have previously point
Jones,
As I have previously pointed out, Clarke's analysis is flawed in terms of
COP analysis - perhaps as badly as the analysis by the Lugano researchers.
Failure to recognize and account for the transmitted radiation through the
outer envelope is a BIG error. Insufficient data was taken and/or
It is interesting to note that address is right next door to a Pepsi
beverage plant.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> One of the legal documents lists Rossi's customer:
>
>
>
Jones,
It sounds like my understanding of IRH is wrong and I need to find the
source of the description. Can you point to a particular paper, where IRH
is described? Perhaps by Lawandy or Miley? From what you described, it
doesn't sound like IRH is a plausible state of condensed matter.
In
See below...
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Bob Higgins etal.
>
> I agree that the definitions are confusing. I have understood that
> Rydberg matter refers to an ionic state of an element where there are no
> associate
e can spontaneously form from the
RM state because we are talking about condensed matter changing state all
at once, and the resulting state, while being highly dense, is also HIGH
energy.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Bob,
>
Jones, isn't there a distinction between [UDH and UDD] and the [IRH and
DDL]? As I understood it [IRH and DDL] are references to sub-ground states
for an individual hydrogen atom. OTOH, [UDH and UDD] are condensed matter
states of multiple atoms. Did I get this wrong?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at
We should forget about the patho-skeptics (Cude, Yugo), as their tripe is
not worth the time spent reading. I don't know why such people exist in
the forums unless they are getting paid to help slow development of LENR.
I can't imaging that they get much enjoyment from the time they spend
igrams of zinc is sufficient and
> the two together are synergetic since zinc operates in the lowest Rydberg
> regime whereas either lithium or potassium operate at the 3x multiple of
> 81.6 eV which is significantly more difficult to access, even at 1200 C.
>
>
>
> In s
See below ...
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would
>>
Jones,
While all of this Zn speculation is an interesting theory/hypothesis, it
stemmed from a completely improbable hypothesis - that the 4.4% of measured
64Ni was due to contamination by Zn in Parkhomov's Sochi analyses.
First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would
Don't know if this will come through, but it is small... Here is the image
of the label unwrapped from the jar:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Okay, without the noise:
>
> http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM,
This is an interesting prospect. 64Ni and 64Zn are not separable by even
high resolution ICP-MS. HR-ICP-MS can have resolving powers up to about
10k, but separating 64Ni and 64Zn would require a resolving power of about
55k. It is also relatively difficult to separate Ni and Zn chemically.
element should sum to 100%.
It is likely that the graph on the the left did not come from ICP-MS, but
rather from SIMS analysis.
Bob Higgins
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The AP test results at slide 14 did not make sense to me. In par
ce
> of BS out the window into the garden where it might do some good.
>
>
>
> The isotope in question was 62Ni. It was reported by two third-party
> groups who did the assays. It's obviously not bogus. The question is how
> it got there. There is no need to presume that t
We could ask Parkhomov through Bob Greenyer if the Ni powder he used was
enriched in 64Ni. However, as far as we know, and in particular during
these reported runs, Parkhomov was on a shoestring budget that would have
precluded buying isotopically enriched Ni. As far as we know all of his
ition inside the EM Drive might be made, a simple small amount of
> crystalline Li2D2 could well provide more available reactant than what the
> ordinary copper which always has some tramp H2 the EM Drive is made of
> holds.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmai
I have not analyzed Shawyer's cavity design to understand what resonant
mode is responsible for his thrust, and what other resonant cavity modes
are supported by the cavity. The microwave oven magnetron can be pulled in
frequency somewhat by a highly coupled resonant mode. You want to make
sure
You can get about a 6% improvement in Q of the resonator by plating several
skin depths of Ag on top of the Cu. This is frequently done to reduce
filter loss where the loss is dominated by metal losses. It is possible to
choose resonant cavity modes that have higher Q due to less coupling to the
be a significant observation. I wonder if Ni-64 is significantly
> less stable than the rest of the Ni isotopes and has a long half life that
> we do not know about. It may like cold neutrons. It would transmute to
> Ni-65 which decays with a beta to Cu-65 which is stable. I do not know
have done. It is a marvelous mystery and perhaps
someday I will participate. For now, I am trying to stay focused on LENR.
Bob
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
undertaking. Properly funded, it could be built in 1-2 months,
but it may take another 2 months of test runs to produce an accurate
thermal model for it (that is the hardest part).
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
> Ø
>
&
My understanding, and I could be wrong, is that the thrust Shawyer
calculates and measures from his devices is several orders of magnitude
higher than what could be obtained from photon radiation recoil - even if
all of the generated RF were radiated unidirectionally. A small leak of RF
would
Muons with less than about 4MeV are not going to escape the reactor.
Cosmic muons are average 2GeV. No magnetic field that I could generate is
going to significantly deflect either of these.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> @Bob
>
> Use a magnetic shield
gt;
> If the counts are higher inside the lead cave, compared to outside (bare),
> it is very likely that the source is muonic from the reactor, not cosmic -
> and the target is lead.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> I don't know if other Vorts thought of this already
the bremsstrahlung.
Bob Higgins
Eric,
I know the 610 keV peak is right where it should be. The scaling was done
as a single multiplicative scale based on the 2.2 MeV peak in the source
graph (I.E. 2-point scaling was not done). Once it was scaled, since the
610 keV peak was in the correct place, I presumed the others had been
Based on comments from Jones and others, I have done some analysis to
determine if the GS5.2 signal in Spectrum-07 could have come from gamma
produced from radon gas decay progeny. First, Alan Goldwater produced a
map showing the areas where radon levels were high in his area. In the
area of his
n isotopes have gamma decay channels in addition to alpha.
> The signatures are well known (around 6 MeV).
>
>
>
> Radon detection is a cottage industry in silicon valley
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> Jeff's setup may be more sensitive to radon
Jeff's setup may be more sensitive to radon than Alan's. The NaI detector
that Alan used is only sensitive to gamma, and not beta. Radon decay
chains are primarily alpha and beta emissions. With the foil wrapped
around Jeff's GM detector, he probably does not have much alpha
sensitivity, but he
I think at least an equal concern to radiation exposure is the incidental
exposure to vented nickel tetracarbonyl vapor. I believe this can cause
pulmonary distress at quite low concentrations. The tolerance for nickel
tetracarbonyl may be quite low. The nickel tetracarbonyl can come from
One of the characteristics of at least Ni-H LENR is the likelihood that the
energy from the NAE is transported away from the reaction site via low
energy radiation. This creates the possibility that, like seen in a
microwave oven, the surrounding apparatus may become hotter than the
source. Rossi
The events leading up to the excess heat are also significant. Apparently
in the heat treatment phase the H2 pressure was topped up with a tank to
500kPa and it stayed there a while. Then the pressure began to fall
gradually to 300kPa where, at about 14:15, the pressure was topped up again
to
=0B5Pc25a4cOM2X1F6TjJ1RkI5eGc
Bob Higgins
T3 is not connected.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jack Cole wrote:
>
> T1 is in an air gap apparently. Possibly that could make more sense.
>>
>
> Let's see . . . You mean it is installed in the middle of the "T-Bone"
>
- and in fact, there were some gems hidden in there.
For your reading pleasure ... on my Google Drive
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2bV9DLUp1MTkwU1U
Bob Higgins
orber, and then the aluminum absorbs the 6 keV from the
Fe, but gives off 1.5 keV Al characteristic x-ray in small amount.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
> Ø Jones, the moral of the story is that the large amount of lead
>
Jones, the moral of the story is that the large amount of lead (and it
probably took a whole lot for the HPGe detector) converted some of the
cosmic rays into a small *neutron* flux. MFMP did not measure neutrons.
The Lugano evaluation only made intermittent spot checks for neutrons -
they found
Well, this is partly true. Only charged particles will come to rest
quickly and generate Bremsstrahlung. Protons, because they are so heavy
compared to an electron, must be 1800x the energy of the electron to have
the same initial velocity. Then the heavier proton will basically
decelerate 1800
The sensors were placed relatively far away, and the total "dose" was low.
For the electronic rate meters, they did not report what they detected,
simply that it was below the alarm level that they had set (set where?).
There was no spectrometry.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:12 PM, H LV
OR, the materials in the stack of his flat plate reactor include a thermal
resistance material. It doesn't have to be an air gap to provide the
thermal resistance that would allow the fuel to be at a different
temperature than the molten lead.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 1:09 PM, David Roberson
Magnetic materials have hysteresis in the B-H curve that causes work to be
done when the magnetic field changes.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:34 AM, H Ucar wrote:
> I observed dramatic heating of iron/steel rods of 2-4 mm diameter at 5 to
> 10 mm distance to spinning Nd magnet
I looked at the math again. The 5 uS was for the full 4pi steradians. It
would be more like 0.4 uS for 1 steradian. A person would have to be
really chubby or really close to subtend 1 steradian.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> From t
>From the signal pulse, I estimate about 5 micro-Sieverts (uS) per
steradian. So, it depends on how close you were.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Russ George wrote:
> If the radiation signal in the recent MFMP experiment holds up what does
> this infer as a dose for
16 at 8:39 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> OTOH, radiation measurements are an excellent metric.
>>
>
> I do not think so. There are many reports of experiments that produced
> massive e
You on touching on one of the fundamental issues with experimental LENR -
what do you use for a metric? If you want to progress from no results or
poor results in your experiment, you need to have a way to measure whether
you are getting better or worse as you introduce changes - you need a
Like local DC magnetic fields, evanescent fields quickly decay to 0. These
are non-propagating local fields. These are the fields responsible for
inductance and capacitance. It is the opposite of a radiating field.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Stephen Cooke
You can get high electric fields at small scale, but that is not the same
as having a total electric potential of 500kV. In a vacuum, a 500kV
potential can generate 500keV electrons.
It is interesting to think about in light of our recent measurement of high
energy emissions from the Ni-H
This is conceptually what we are thinking the distribution probably looks
like, but I will have to see it in log scale. I will check. The peak
would have to be below the 30keV cutoff seen in the GS5.2 spectrum. In the
region of the GS5.2 spectrum just above 30keV, the slope just above 30keV
has
As I said in the article, the deepest DDL level (see JofCMNS vol-18 Paillet
and Meulenberg) is about 509keV. That is energy TAKEN from the atom to
shrink it into that deepest state. Suppose that all of that energy
catalyzed out by evanescent means was suddenly released applied to a photon
or a
the Fusor
>
>
>
>
> http://www.fusor.net/board/download/file.php?id=3829=a1b499f80621282e42d797de7b48729a
>
>
>
> There are several related threads on Fusor.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> I have never seen a properly taken gamma spectrum from the FF, have you?
>
>
>
That's an interesting question. The problem is that the FF is a known
producer of neutrons, so you would need to measure the gamma spectrum on
the far side of a neutron absorber. I have never seen a properly taken
gamma spectrum from the FF, have you?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Russ
Santilli has also published a number of papers documenting massive (pun)
transmutations. See:
ADDITIONAL CONFIRMATION OF "INTERMEDIATE
CONTROLLED NUCLEAR FUSION" WITHOUT
HARMFUL RADIATIONS OR WASTE
Ruggero Maria Santilli
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Cooke
as a
line in the gamma spectrum. That would nicely localize the source of the
high energy.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Also, the
il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> There is presently no description in a hydroton theory for MeV+ electron
>> emission.
>>
>
> Although I do not find Ed Storms's theory persuasive, I suspect I kn
I agree, this paper is a nice find. It used high end equipment - 4" NaI
sensors and HPGe detector. It is presently beyond the scope of MFMP (at
the moment). The advantage of the HPGe detector over the NaI is that it
has a narrow detection bandwidth. The NaI detector has a 6.5% FWHM while
the
Alan has a full set of gamma check sources. Initial calibration was done
with 137Cs. The energy scale drifted over time with heating from the
reactor. The background always showed the 78keV x-ray and 1461 40K
background peaks. I re-calibrated the energy scale on every file,
resampled each to
billion K and other parts are at 100 million K? The temperatures are just
absurd. Can you check my calculations?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bob Higgins,
>>
>
> It could really be a black body radiation. Cons
urface lower temperature. Most people decided this was a
> consequence of their camera's settings. Did the Lugano team say this
> was reason?
>
> Harry
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I don't think that is the
peaks which is the opposite of a
> > blackbody distribution.
> >
> > Harry
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> One of the researchers that I discussed this with suggested that the
> >&
This is akin to ascribing a temperature to an electron ensemble having a
certain distribution of kinetic energy. It is valid to consider it that
way, but it is still the electron energy distribution that is determining
the "characteristic temperature". May turn out to have some meaning if
looked
I would have to investigate this further, but this distribution as an E^2
in the denominator and the measured spectrum is approx. 1/E^2 .
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Bob Higgins, what about a
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relati
all or due to radon
variation.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
>
>
>
> Ø
>
> Ø Where is your analysis that this spectrum could have come from a puff
> of radon gas?
>
>
>
> Bob, Santa Cruz CA i
10x more than that of you provided...
>
> Bob Higgins, in my work with Akito, I proposed that in cold fusion you
> have, unlike the conventional fusion, the fusion of more than 2 nuclei.
> There are not experiments with more than 2 nuclei fusioning (C12 is formed
> by B8, which is
Jones,
Where is your analysis that this spectrum could have come from a puff of
radon gas? There were longer background measurements that were entirely
constant in photometric reduction. The indications of radon come primarily
from the characteristic x-ray peak at 78keV (due to lead and bismuth
d will become an important probe into the science behind the
curtain. It will lead to replication and then to engineering.
Bob Higgins
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Well - OK... there is a tiny signal - but let's look at the counts per
> min
to handling the nickel tetracarbonyl.
The MFMP plan is to run with about a 4x enrichment over natural Ni - not
pure 62Ni.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> *From:* Bob Higgins
> > MFMP intends to find out by purchasing some 96% enriched 62Ni to run i
The Lugano report states that the ~1g of fuel was poured into the reactor.
However, I am told that when the researchers were retrieving a sample of
ash, it was firmly attached to the tube walls. The reactor had to be
broken open (maybe Rossi did this for them) and the ash sample was scraped
off
While I have plenty of reasons to criticize the means of analysis of the
Lugano experiment, the time it took to release the report is not something
I would criticize. The analysis of the ash could only be conducted after
the experiment was completed. After termination of the experiment,
m less skeptical than
> before that there is a real energy anomaly here. This does not mean that
> Steorn is capable of harnessing it, since they have demonstrated no level
> of high skill or acumen (other than in fundraising) so the door is still
> open for others with the proper skills.
>
It appears from the Steorn video description pointed to by Jones below that
the the "power packs" behave as an unusual capacitor. The device appears
to have separate charge and discharge modes. In charge mode the
capacitor-like "power-packs" are "charged" from a high voltage source (2x9V
battery
The USPTO was created by congress under authority to do so granted by the
Constitution of the USA. They are responsible to the US congress. The
mission granted to congress is:
"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for
limited Times to Authors and Inventors the
When Mills described his latest device, it wasn't clear to me how he was
delivering the water along with his molten silver droplets. In the
previous incarnation of his machine, he has porous solid pellets that were
delivered into the discharge with water in the porosity. Now he has
switched to
Sorry, I mis-counted my divisions ... the supercaps would expire after 16.7
MINUTES - they are only rated for 1M discharges, so at 1000/sec, you get
1000sec or 16.7 minutes.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> One of the things I noticed
One of the things I noticed in Mills' apparatus is his use of supercaps -
in this case Maxwell P285 supercaps. Supercaps sound great until you dig
into the details. Supercaps are somewhere between a battery and a
capacitor in specifications. One of the core specifications that is a
problem for
neering.
>
> Would you like to add to my speculations?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Sun, Feb 7, 2016 11:11 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: BLP demo video
>
>
idal silver internally.
>
>
>
> I am ever more convinced that what is being produced is ‘cooled fusion’
> perhaps hydrino cooled fusion.
> http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2016/02/04/cooled-fusion/
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com]
>
s of water it takes to get a
MW-H? Only a very small amount is turning into hydrinos that cannot be
recovered.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Ho
Dave,
I am not sure what you say is entirely true. The 10V source can provide
direct heating to a certain temperature, and can create a plasma from
electron impact. A plasma is comprised of ionized gas. However, the ions
don't need to be bare nuclei, and typically are not for anything but a
In the presentation, Mills showed the spectrum from Ag plasma. It included
a soft x-ray band of lines and a UV band of lines. The spectrum did not
look blackbody. If there was any evidence that Mills was producing
something other than resistive plasma heating, *perhaps* the spectrum was
some
Thank you, Axil, for this link. It is slide 49, in particular to which I
am making reference. In this slide you can see the soft x-ray set of lines
around 20-60nm, and another set of deep UV lines from 120-300nm. What I
was saying is that the band from 120-300nm is explain-able from the 10V
long at that temperature? Maybe it is a
> metal hydrino compound [image: Smile]
>
> Bob Cook
>
> *From:* Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 05, 2016 8:03 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video
>
>
Mills talked about the source voltage being "only 10V", but 10V has at
least the potential to deliver 10eV of energy. 10eV of energy is the
energy of a photon at 124nm in the extreme UV. His "only 10V" statement
was meant to dissuade the listener that high energy photons were not
possible
201 - 300 of 777 matches
Mail list logo