These messages denote a gap in the time stamps. They say nothing about
what the processor was actually doing during that interval: waiting,
stopped, etc. This is exactly how parked processors look on a trace.
Thanks, Ed. When I learned debugging, I was told that time gaps in systrace
are a bad
Donald Johnson wrote:
Can someone help me by providing a sample batch JCL member to compile
COBOL programs using HLPI for DL/I?
Perhaps, if you could tell us what is HLPI and DL/I.
(I got a few vague hits in my bookmanager for DL/I, but nothing for HLPI.)
Groete / Greetings
Elardus
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:02:24 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
If I use the C function remove() to remove a member from a PDSE, then from
that moment on, the PDSE is locked, ISPF says in use, I can't create a new
member
We also say SNAH and KICKS in The Netherlands and during a course in Atlanta it
took me a while to understand what was meant with C-I-C-S.
On the matter of screws:
I own a 91 Jeep Wrangler with a lot of torx screws and in time the torx-hole
becomes a round hole.
Allan-screws are a bit better
Including of course south of the border!
I wonder how many know that Mexico is
The United States of Mexico = Estados Unidos Mexicanos
refer wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico
which does not correctly identify the United States of America in the second
sentence.
On Mon, 26 Jul
Barbara Nitz wrote:
No, it's 64K tracks. It is the same per volume limit as many other
data set types (non-extended). But PDSes and PDSEs are also limited
to a single volume.
I am surprised. I did not know about *those* limitations. And most certainly,
since they are documented, there will
DL/I means basically IMS ... However I've not heard of HLPI :-( ...
So can't help sorry ...
Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
27/07/2010 08:41 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Steve Comstock pisze:
Barbara Nitz wrote:
[...]
PDSEs have only one advantage: They don't need to get compressed. The
rest us a huge amount of disadvantages.
Regards, Barbara
Well, they do have at least one other advantage: they can store
program objects, which allows entry points with
HI,
In response to the earlier posts:
Can someone help me by providing a sample batch JCL member to compile
COBOL programs using HLPI for DL/I?
Perhaps, if you could tell us what is HLPI and DL/I.
Historically DL/I was, and probably still is, the VSE equivalent of IMS DB
on z/OS. I suspect
Mathew,
You obviously didn't read John M's previous note The clue is to read
the bottom of every post on this list and it tells you what to do ...
As John said 'Youth of today eh ?'
Enjoy ...
- Tibish Mathew tibish.mat...@wipro.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Etienne Thijsse wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:02:24 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
If I use the C function remove() to remove a member from a PDSE, then from
that moment on, the PDSE is locked, ISPF says in
Thanks Terry, in my stupor, I had forgotten to look in the IMS Sample libs.
I will check there and hopefully have that JCL. Your analysis was spot on,
by the way.
* dj *
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Terry Sambrooks
terry.sambro...@btclick.com wrote:
HI,
In response to the earlier posts:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:02:19 +0800, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Etienne Thijsse wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:10 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:02:24 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
If I use the C function remove() to remove a
One type of screw head that I haven't seen mentioned here is the torx,
or hexalobular, head. While the Philips screw was designed to cam out
of the screw to prevent overtightening, the torx screw, like the
Robertson screw, was designed to not cam out. It came about as better
torque-limiting
Hi Lizette,
I think EMC gives us a choice with this parameter:
AUTOMATIC_DEALLOC|AUTO_DEAlloc(YES|NO)
The AUTOMATIC_DEALLOC parameter allows or disallows
automatic issuance of an S DEALLOC command to z/OS when a
device VARY ONLINE or VARY OFFLINE appears to be hung. z/OS
sometimes requires a
Well, this article is certainly a slam at Neon with this statement.
Neon Software is being a smart-alek by offering an IMS-only version of zPrime
for $1, and it is a shameless means of growing what is still a pretty small
installed base for the zPrime product.
And I love what they say at the
So, what do we in the United States of America call ourselves. We've
been called Americans, Americanos, or some other variation probably
every since we became a country. However, I was in Bolivia one year and
when I said to one of the Bolivians that I was an American he said You
know that we're
Does anyone have a comprehensive list of structure names and who uses them?
I am attempting to improve documentation and didn't want to reinvent the wheel
if someone has already produced a list of most of them and their definitions.
Thanks in advance,
Bob
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Bruce Hewson bruce_hew...@hotmail.comwrote:
snip
refer wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico
which does not correctly identify the United States of America in the
second
sentence.
So fix it...
Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote in message
news:2d14e7856646224aacdda13ab1d355570a7020b...@wdcv7exvs2.opm.gov...
Does anyone have a comprehensive list of structure names and who uses
them?
I am attempting to improve documentation and didn't want to reinvent
the wheel if
Columbia should be just fine according to wikipedia!
Col'o'mbia is already taken ;)
-
Columbia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Colombia, the country in South America.
Columbia (name) is a poetic name for America (in the sense of European
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:53:38 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Does anyone have a comprehensive list of structure names and who uses them?
I am attempting to improve documentation and didn't want to reinvent the
wheel if someone has already produced a list of most of them
Hello,
I read the announcement and it is my understanding that at first only AIX
will be supported,
*But*, later availability announced for Linux on Intel based blades.
Am I correct ?
Arye.
On 27 July 2010 02:03, Gainsford, Allen allen.gainsf...@hp.com wrote:
Which is more interesting ?-)
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:26:50 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Steve Comstock pisze:
Barbara Nitz wrote:
[...]
PDSEs have only one advantage: They don't need to get compressed. The
rest us a huge amount of disadvantages.
Regards, Barbara
And, I believe, multiple members can be written concurrently (I
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:02:19 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Thanks for responding, Gil. There is no other stream. When I run under the
debugger, the PDSE remains accessible with ISPF right up to the remove()
statement; when I step over it, it is locked.
It's yet possible
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:47:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:02:19 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Thanks for responding, Gil. There is no other stream. When I run under the
debugger, the PDSE remains accessible with ISPF right up
Kees,
I had that open when I asked the question! smile I was not very impressed.
no smile
I attempted Google searches on some of them and was, again, a little
disappointed.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
On 27 Jul 2010 00:03:45 -0700, maarten.slegtenho...@mail.ing.nl
(Maarten Slegtenhorst) wrote:
On the matter of screws:
I own a 91 Jeep Wrangler with a lot of torx screws and in time the torx-hole
becomes a round hole.
Allan-screws are a bit better but still have the same problem.
I personally
On 26 Jul 2010 14:27:44 -0700, ken.porow...@cit.com (Ken Porowski)
wrote:
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe announcement in
decades and most of the traffic on this list is on the etymology of CICS
and PoPs
I love it.
It's not like I'm going out today to buy a new mainframe.
It may be that they don't have the management piece for Linux yet
Power7/AIX supported from November
xBlades/Linux support is only a statement of direction for 1st half 2011
Maybe when that comes out we'll see Power7/Linux
-Original Message-
Kirk Wolf
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:33 PM,
On 27 Jul 2010 05:51:04 -0700, thomas.kel...@commercebank.com (Kelman,
Tom) wrote:
So, what do we in the United States of America call ourselves.
Our name is like the United Nations or the United Kingdom - a
description about what was wanted instead of a real name.
OH COME ON!
Can we PLEASE kill this thread, NOW?
Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.edu 7/27/2010 10:13 AM
On 27 Jul 2010 00:03:45 -0700, maarten.slegtenho...@mail.ing.nl
(Maarten Slegtenhorst) wrote:
On the matter of screws:
I own a 91 Jeep Wrangler with a lot of torx screws and in time the
Mark,
Thanks for the pointers. So far, my best source is the reason I am documenting
them now: the paper called System-Managed CF Structure Duplexing. I am in the
process of identifying what should/should not be duplexed and thought I would
produce a document of those decisions. Most
Did I get the VB?
We don't have any structures system managed duplexed because of the
distance between de CF's in both our data centers.
Kees.
Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote in message
news:2d14e7856646224aacdda13ab1d355570a7020b...@wdcv7exvs2.opm.gov...
Mark,
Thanks for
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:01:46 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
That may well be true. At this moment however, I know nothing about ISPF
services or how to call them from C. I'll keep this in mind as a lost resort,
if all
else fails.
The best I can say is that it's in the book.
At the moment I am
Yes, you were the first respondent. I should have made it an offline request
*and* the actual define policy JCL! :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:41 AM
To:
We are installing a new z10 with a minimal DS6800 in a very small data center
(to replace our venerable MP2003). Using the SMC, we have configured the
DS6800 with RAID 5 to give us 250GB of usable storage set up as eleven 3390-3s
and the rest as 3390-9s. (We wanted to use RAID 10 but the
PDSEs have only one advantage: snip
Well, they do have at least one other advantage: they can store
program objects, which allows entry points with long, case-sensitive
names, which is sometimes handy.
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
No not really. Longer names may be
See imbedded.
Hal
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ron Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Any ROT for DASD Response time
Hal,
I should have been clear. The statement I
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:47:15 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:01:46 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
That may well be true. At this moment however, I know nothing about ISPF
services or how to call them from C. I'll keep this in mind as a lost resort,
if
IIRC, the relationship is implicit. The first ADDRESS refers to the first
logical volume, the second ADDRESS is the second logical volume, and so on.
This can get tricky if you delete a logical volume.
HTH and good luck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Who would want a VIRTUAL beer anyway, they are not anywhere near as good as the
real thing!
Richards, Robert B. robert.richa...@opm.gov 7/27/2010 10:59 AM
Yes, you were the first respondent. I should have made it an offline request
*and* the actual define policy JCL! :-)
Bob
-Original
Hi,
One of our teams recently had difficulty downloading PTFs and again we
traced it back to servers that were in use by IBMLink that were not in
our firewall.
We complained that we had not been notified of changes. This was
acknowledged and an IBMLink news item was posted (PMR# 50090,487)
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:15:11 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Any idea how to get rid of this ENQ SHR ?
Have you verified that there's an outstanding ENQ?
Use the TSO command FREE DSN(whatever.dsn) or equivalent call to
DYNALLOC or BPXWDYN.
Use TSO LISTALC STATUS SYSNAMES and find the DDNAME and
Hope this helps if you need I can send IOCDS input file as a guide. This
is a DS6800 setup
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3000,PATH=((CSS(0),D2,D3,D4,D5)),*
UNITADD=((00,256)),CUADD=0,UNIT=1750
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(3000,256),CUNUMBR=(3000),STADET=Y,UNIT=3390
yes, very much thanks
Andy Robertson telephone mobile 0777 214 9545 home 01308 420797
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
Does the following fragment help?
*
* INFORMATION RETRIEVED FROM JES VIA IEFSSREQ
LAR1,ASSOB
MVC RVDERMAC,=CL8'IEFSSREQ'
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:47:07 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:15:11 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
Any idea how to get rid of this ENQ SHR ?
Have you verified that there's an outstanding ENQ?
Use the TSO command FREE DSN(whatever.dsn) or equivalent call
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:35:24 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
There is a SYS00035 DDNAME associated with the PDSE, but freeing it with
dynfree gave me error 4 reason 1056, which means the dataset hasn't been
closed. :-(
So that didn't work...
Was it SHR? Why does C RTL have it OPEN? (It's
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:57:07 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I don't even like ordinary PDS. Other operating systems don't need them.
That doesn't make them wrong.
There are some implementation flaws, but they exist, so use them, and know
flaws and repairs.
If you don't understand what's wrong
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:50:35 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:35:24 -0500, Etienne Thijsse wrote:
There is a SYS00035 DDNAME associated with the PDSE, but freeing it with
dynfree gave me error 4 reason 1056, which means the dataset hasn't been
closed. :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: remove() of PDSE member leaves PDS locked
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:50:35 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:49:30 -0400, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: remove() of
Barry,
I don't know if this will help or not. The DS6800 installation,
troubleshooting and recovery guide goes through building out the storage
on the array. Unfortunately it leaves a bit to be desired on how to
tie this to z-boxes. GC26-7678 (I have -08 generation) is the manual
and chapter 7
If you don't understand what's wrong with PDS, re-read Etienne Thijsse's
thread on attempting to delete a PDSE member.
I didn't say I didn't understand, I said that you had to do so.
Understand their limitations, and how to fix them when they break.
They're not going away.
Or imagine my
A little OT, but just wondering: does ISPF do the same ENQs for
PDSEs as with PDS when updating members?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Another reason to hate PDSE's
A little OT, but just wondering: does ISPF do the same ENQs for
Is there a preferred hashing algorithm for such strings? The strings will be
fixed length with trailing blanks.
I was thinking of simply doing a MOD64 (or higher) of the sum of the non-blank
part of the string by words, but as this is text with a limited character set,
would this lead to
The SHARE MVS Core Technologies Project is sponsoring the following
technical presentations surrounding zEnterprise next week at SHARE in
Boston. Be there or be square.
Session 7585: Evaluating Best Fit Architecture for Customer Workloads on
zEnterprise Systems
Session 7538: IBM zEnterprise
What's the goal of the hashing -- obfuscation? Shortening the data?
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
Is there a preferred hashing algorithm for such strings? The strings will
be
fixed length with trailing blanks.
I was thinking of simply
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:32:24 -0400 zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
:What's the goal of the hashing -- obfuscation? Shortening the data?
Lookup.
Does the entry exist, and if so what are its attributes. If does not exist,
add.
:On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Binyamin Dissen
Or imagine my astonished dismay the first time I allocated a member with
DISP=(OLD,DELETE) and watched the entire PDS vanish.
In the early 1970s, at a bank using MVT on 370/155, soon after DOS-OS
conversion, all procs were stored in SYS1.PROCLIB. Excessively neat
programmer deleted a member
OK, I have a splitting headache and may be dense anyway: how is it easier to
look it up once it's hashed? What am I missing?
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:32:24 -0400 zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
:What's the
I have used the technique of adding byte values for a hash count in two
shops over two decades to cut the length of a threaded list. Both times I
used mod256 to good effect.
The first time the string was an eight character variable name, the second
time a set of strings over 64 bytes long.
snip
IBM makes what is claimed to be the biggest Mainframe announcement in
decades and most of the traffic on this list is on the etymology of CICS
and PoPs
I love it.
At 8:47 AM -0500 on 7/27/10, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: remove()
of PDSE member leaves PDS locked:
remove() upgrades this to EXC (bad design of C RTL; as you say, SAS
(RIP) does better). Then there's no way to downgrade it to SHR (bad
design of GRS).
I agree with you about the bad
corrected text:
Worth trying first is von Neumann's classical scheme. Divide the value
obtained using the z/Architecture machine instruction CKSUM. Then use its
remainder mod(s), where s is any convenient small prime. The result will often
be an approximately rectangular distribution of
-snip
Yeah, I was astounded to see this bubble up high enough that a gas
station blabber-at-you-while-you-pump screen had the story!
unsnip---
Seems like a
This is what I have used in past mainframe applications:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?HASHWF
/Tom Kern
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Is there a preferred hashing algorithm for such strings? The strings will be
fixed length with trailing blanks.
I was thinking of simply
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:43:47 -0400 zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote:
:OK, I have a splitting headache and may be dense anyway: how is it easier to
:look it up once it's hashed? What am I missing?
Not easier, faster.
Assume 10 strings. A serial search will take on average 5 compares. A
-snip--
We also say SNAH and KICKS in The Netherlands and during a course in Atlanta it
took me a while to understand what was meant with C-I-C-S.
On the matter of screws:
I own a 91 Jeep Wrangler with a lot of torx screws
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
What is so hard (or dangerous) about just altering the status of the
EXC to SHR and then running the same code as the DEQ (after first
checking if the second entry is a SHR request [if it is an EXC do not
run the code])?
Agreed. This is a long-standing complaint.
-snip
Barbara Nitz wrote:
No, it's 64K tracks. It is the same per volume limit as many other
data set types (non-extended). But PDSes and PDSEs are also limited
to a single volume.
I am surprised. I did not know
A little OT, but just wondering: does ISPF do the same ENQs for PDSEs as
with PDS when updating members?
I don't think it's OT, but the answer is YES.
PDSEs, while different under the covers, still look like PDS's to the
uninitiated (programmes, not people).
-
I'm a SuperHero with neither
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:59:01 + john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com
wrote:
:Worth trying first is von Neumann's classical scheme. Divide the value
obtained using the z/Architecture machine instruction CKSUM. Then use its
remainder mod(s), where s is any convenient small prime. The result
snip---
One type of screw head that I haven't seen mentioned here is the torx,
or hexalobular, head. While the Philips screw was designed to cam out
of the screw to prevent overtightening, the torx screw, like the
Lizette,
Apologies for replying so late, I am not a Panvalet expert but I asked
someone who is and their reply is:
PANMODI is the Panvalet I/O processor. It is used by ROSCOE to access
Panvalet PANLIBs (IMPORT/EXPORT members between Panvalet and ROSCOE).
PANMODI gets linked with the RSSCPAN0
Um, what???
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
-snip
Yeah, I was astounded to see this bubble up high enough that a gas station
blabber-at-you-while-you-pump screen had the story!
snip--
If you don't understand what's wrong with PDS, re-read Etienne Thijsse's
thread on attempting to delete a PDSE member. Or imagine my astonished
dismay the first time I allocated a member with DISP=(OLD,DELETE)
Am I missing something? Why not use a binary chop search? That is, each compare
cuts the universe in half. For a million entries, you would need 20 or less
compares.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_algorithm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
John,
What's up with the subject lines getting destroyed when you post? It
makes threading difficult.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:mzel...@flash.net
Mark's MVS Utilities:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:43:08 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote:
Am I missing something? Why not use a binary chop search? That is, each
compare cuts the universe in half. For a million entries, you would need 20
or less compares.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_algorithm
Insertion?
For
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:42:57 -0400, Kirk Talman wrote:
Or imagine my astonished dismay the first time I allocated a member with
DISP=(OLD,DELETE) and watched the entire PDS vanish.
In the early 1970s, at a bank using MVT on 370/155, soon after DOS-OS
conversion, all procs were stored in
It depends on the number of DDM's and the size of the DDM's and if you make
1 or two array sites how your IOCDS will look like. Cuadd= has a relation
with the lcuid
2010/7/27 Schwarz, Barry A barry.a.schw...@boeing.com
We are installing a new z10 with a minimal DS6800 in a very small data
As I wrote, there is the issue of dynamically balancing the tree as random
insertions come in.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:43:08 -0500 Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
:Am I missing something? Why not use a binary chop search? That is, each
compare cuts the universe in half. For a million
Three responses:
Yes, 61, which is prime, is better than 64 = 2^6, which is composite.
A binary search/chop is easy when one has all of the values one is going to
search for compresent and available to be put into a table. When one is
acquiring these values serially in time, a
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:26:50 +0200, R.S. wrote:
Steve Comstock pisze:
Barbara Nitz wrote:
[...]
PDSEs have only one advantage: They don't need to get compressed. The
rest us a huge amount of disadvantages.
Regards, Barbara
And, I believe, multiple members can be
I suspect IBM wants to keep the penguin colonies appropriately corralled.
Hard to tout you can support hundreds/thousands of Linuses in a (native) LPAR
environment. Does Power have a z/VM analogue ?.
Shane ...
On Wed, Jul 28th, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Ken Porowski wrote:
It may be that they don't
The munging comes and the munging goes. Today it is occurring. Yesterday it
did not.
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get
Shane Ginnane wrote:
I suspect IBM wants to keep the penguin colonies appropriately corralled.
Hard to tout you can support hundreds/thousands of Linuses in a (native) LPAR
environment. Does Power have a z/VM analogue ?.
Not the same functionality as z/VM. There is PowerVM which is the Power7
On 7/27/2010 6:06 PM, john gilmore wrote:
into a table. When one is acquiring these values serially in
time, a binary-search tree can be used instead; but it must
be kept balanced/compact; and this is a non-trivial
undertaking.
It depends on one's perception of trivial. Volume 3 of Knuth's
If citizens of the United States of Mexico are called Mexicans then why
shouldn't the citizens of the United States of America be called Americans?
Other than the USA there is no one place that is simply referred to as America.
There is North America and South America, which are continents.
---snip---
It depends on one's perception of trivial. Volume 3 of Knuth's Art of
Computer Programming has a very simple algorithm for building balanced
trees.
---unsnip--
I
On 7/27/2010 8:42 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I can tell you from bitter experience that while the algorithm
is fairly simple, implementation is most assuredly NOT simple. :-(
About twelve years ago I was working as a contractor at a
government agency that routinely processed files with hundreds
Explanation of hashing functions and table look up:
If you have a table with entries identified by a key, one of the
typical requirements is to locate a table entry having some given key
(or prove the entry doesn't exist).
If the range of key values is suitably small so that all key values
may
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:06:18 +, john gilmore wrote:
Yes, 61, which is prime, is better than 64 = 2^6, which is composite.
...
If division-method hashing is used a prime divisor/modulus is highly
desirable. Clustering at the prime divisors of a composite modulus does
occur. I dislike
On 27 Jul 2010 13:18:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-snip
Barbara Nitz wrote:
No, it's 64K tracks. It is the same per volume limit as many other
data set types (non-extended). But PDSes and PDSEs are
On 27 Jul 2010 14:17:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:42:57 -0400, Kirk Talman wrote:
Or imagine my astonished dismay the first time I allocated a member with
DISP=(OLD,DELETE) and watched the entire PDS vanish.
In the early 1970s, at a bank using MVT on
Hello experts here,
Found a blog trying to comparing UNIX technology with mainframe, please comment:
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6775-Whats-so-special-about-the-Parallel-Sysplex.html
And answered questions asked by author:
What's so special with parallel sysplex?
Regards
Victor
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:06:18 +, john gilmore wrote:
Yes, 61, which is prime, is better than 64 = 2^6, which is composite.
...
If division-method hashing is used a prime divisor/modulus is highly desirable.
Clustering at the prime divisors of a composite modulus
---snip--
On 7/27/2010 8:42 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I can tell you from bitter experience that while the algorithm
is fairly simple, implementation is most assuredly NOT simple. :-(
About twelve years ago I was working as a
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
