Hi!
Find a ZX/MZ-L
It suits your need very nicely...
I'd second that. For example if you have FG battery grip it will fit
MZ-6 (ZX-L, MZ-L - same camera, different names). Other than that,
this is the last modern Pentax that is compatible with all lenses and
seems to have most of flash
Hello Herb,
I like that shot very much! However it is not crisp sharp, I think
that doesn't hurt, on the contrary, it accentuates the warm feeling of
the nest. Big kudos for that shot!
Sunday, March 14, 2004, 8:51:38 PM, you wrote:
HC taken on the *istD with a Sigma 50-500 and Sigma 2X extender
Hi, Kevin!
Your choice of colours looks way much better than mine. I'll go back and try
to duplicate that on the edited original.
Very interesting to see the similarities in approach among us.
Thanks.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Thornsberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML
Hello Butch,
Thank you very much for that info. It helped me a *lot* to understand
why minilabs scratch film.
Attila
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Bob W wrote:
The use of Re: (note the trailing space) in the subject line of
replies is regulated in the Internet standard document RFC 2822,
section 3.6.5:
I know. And it's still a crap idea. The word 'Subject' covers all the
territory that 'Re:' covers. 'Re:'
You might also consider the PZ-1p/Z-1p. US$300 will buy you a mint one.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE*
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Bob W wrote:
If the dates and times are working properly then that's all you need.
The replies must have come after the first post. Sort by subject and
date/time.
You could even better sort by thread. Each message should have a
In-Reply-To-header that tells which mail it
Hi Kevin,
you can also pull and hold the DOF-preview in M mode.
The metering scale on the right lights up as long you hold the lever in
place.
You can then track the changes in exposure balance according to your
changes of time or aperture...very convenient IMHO.
Thomas
Uh, Doh. I meant
Chris,
I strongly suggest you reduce that morphine dose.
Helmets with brake levers don't exist, you see. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
(who is off to persuade the doctor to give me an antibiotics prescription)
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
David,
My experiments with the sharpening of RAW files is just preliminary yet, but
one thing I have noticed. Images with high contrast areas (like the example
Rob Brigham posted the other day), will benefit from adjusting chromatic
aberration first.
Would be interesting to see comparisons of
Hi Frits,
It seems like the hot pixel phenomena are pretty widespread, but then some dont seem
to have any at all. It will be interesting to
see what the 'average' number of hot pixels is amongst those who submitted results to
Rob.
Cheers
Shaun
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Hello Boris,
Monday, March 15, 2004, 7:24:09 AM, you wrote:
BL Hi!
BA http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/
BA OK, don't shoot me, there are 4 pictures rather big in size. I did an
BA interesting experiment with my lens, and these are the results. You
BA could also read the text, but it is not necessary,
Hi,
Mark wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I do not like it when sellers describe an item as a
Pentax lens in the auction title and then described the item as for
Pentax, made by in the auction body.
There is one retailer that regularly describes a lens as Pentax
bayonet sometimes with
G'day All.
I picked up an as new ZX-L from KEH.com for a very good price.
The only gripe was that they shipped it UPS. Bloody shipping, customs
duty, GST cost more that the ZX-L.
I will never have anything shipped to Australia via UPS again. The next
time I buy from keh.com, I will ask if they
I am asking this one for a friend in San Francisco. He had a EXAKTA
SCHNEIDER 150/4 being cleaned in HK but was messed up. The glasses were not
properly cleaned and there is some mechanicam problem with the aperture.
Does anyone have tried any reputable service centres in that area so my
I'm going to leave a little more of the previous messages than I usually
do, for continuity.
I'm a little confused here.
Has to do with camera body nomenclature.
I had made a notation that what Pentax markets in the U.S. as a ZX-L is
called the MZ-6 in Europe. Yes? No? I think the unknown
Hi!
Let it be clear g, MZ-6, ZX-L, ZX-6, and MZ-L are different names of
the same body. I've no idea where is natural habitat of each of these
names, but the body is the same.
Boris
I also want to understand why I don't get any hot pixels when I use the
Photoshop CS raw converter and create a tiff file that way. Perhaps I
need to tweak the settings.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 10:40, Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Hi Frits,
It seems like the hot pixel phenomena are pretty
My sincere condolences to all the people who are a victim of this
attack.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G'day Keith.
Mate, In Australia the camera sold here is the MZ-6. The MZ-6 is also
sold in europe and Canada as the MZ-6.
However, They are scarce as hens teeth second hand too expensive to
buy new.
I bought the U.S. ZX-L which is the exact same camera, Just a different
model name on it.
Hooroo.
several reasons for the softness: lens isn't super sharp, 2X extender makes
it worse, shooting wide open is worse, and 1/500s shutter speed, even on a
good tripod, is marginal at that much magnification when you have to be
holding the camera and aiming it. the ball head couldn't be tight as i had
the RAW converter is doing noise reduction. turn on Advanced mode and look
at all of the noise reduction settings.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 5:44 AM
Subject: RE: *ist D Pixel Comparison Test
But Frits is reporting hot pixels with in-camera NR on when creating Tiffs but not
when creating RAW and converting in CS. This would suggest that the NR in Photoshop
is doing something better than the dark frame subtraction.
I must admit I am slightly puzzled - I thought the in-camera NR
Good info - thanks!
Re the cost, is there some built-in tax or other DIS-advantage to buying
that camera in OZ, vs. the U.S.?
Other than currency exchange numbers?
What _would_ the MZ-6 cost in OZ?
keith
Trevor Bailey wrote:
G'day Keith.
Mate, In Australia the camera sold here is the MZ-6.
At 03:51 AM 15/03/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Good info - thanks!
Re the cost, is there some built-in tax or other DIS-advantage to buying
that camera in OZ, vs. the U.S.?
Other than currency exchange numbers?
What _would_ the MZ-6 cost in OZ?
keith
I cannot comment on this particular camera, as
Jostein,Come on,I said the camera was in the helmet,but with miniaturisation
who knows?Look what they did to Rolleiflex.Wait a minute,you sure about the
helmet and the brake lever?
Regards Chris K
Good luck with the antibiotic.Plenty of garlic obviates the necessity of
that stuff!
Hi Alan ...
There's no place in San Francisco that I'd recommend. There
might be a good place but I've yet to find it. All my gear
goes out of town.
shel
Alan Chan wrote:
I am asking this one for a friend in San Francisco [...]
Does anyone have tried any reputable service centres in that
Maybe changing the subject of this thread will get it out of
the PAW or WOW. It's just becoming blather and is serving no
one any useful purpose. As for your previous subject line
(Re: wow for the pda users, for walkden, wow. pow wow, pee
wee prickly paw paw, how now bow wow dun cow) ... well, I
Morgan said:
I've owned a ZX-M for about three years now and suddenly decided that I
wanted to be able to do rear-curtain sync flash photography. ...
I learned of all the merits of the AF-500 FTZ flash unit. So, I purchased
it online (used, at half the price).
Imagine my surprise when I
Hopalong Cassidy never struck me as a drama.
Ryan Lee wrote:
My lecturer/tutor at uni, Dr Alan Mckee, author of Australian Television: A
Geneaology of Great Moments, selected Hopalong Cassidy (1949) and after a
deluge of suggestions (and bargaining! The shows everyone mentioned all came
The future may be very exciting, optically at least.
http://www.research.philips.com/InformationCenter/Global/FHomepage.asp?lNodeId=13lArticleId=
CRB
I wish my lens film combination were that good. The dam itself is
actually curved, and the image is full frame. The fisheye only added
the curve to the horizon. I unintentionally put a little of myself into
that photo, the lower right hand corner of that shot is the railing on
the bridge I
Thanks, Frank. I prefer His Bovinity, however, 8-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/14/04 03:52PM
Steve,
You, sir, are the Cow Man!
NOTICE TO EVERYBODY ON
Don't know about 'mulimedia software' that fly, but the fluid lenses are
interesting.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 15:57, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
The future may be very exciting, optically at least.
http://www.research.philips.com/InformationCenter/Global/FHomepage.asp?lNodeId=13lArticleId=
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, mike wilson wrote:
But even Thylvethter's film can't be as crap as Silver Dream Racer, a
film about (allegedly) motorcycle racing and (undoubtedly) in line for
being one of the naffest films ever. It's so bad, I didn't even go to
see it! 8-)))
As any fule no, the very
Hi all.
Well my new to me 28-105 finally arrived Friday,no thanks to the postal service's and
Canada
CustomsgThat part only took them 3 weeks.D'oh.
Looks in great shape and did a dry run with the PZ-1.
Now if Pentax Canada will get back to
That's a great National Geographic photo. The style seems to be out
of favor but I like them.
Larry Hodgson wrote:
Below is a link to a shot that I made yesterday (Saturday). This is called
Horseshoe Bend and is on the Colorado River just below the Glen Canyon Dam
in Arizona. This is a world
Yes they are. Thats a fairly nice composition, it prompts me to ask,
how much do you pay
them to stand in the right positions...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
More bucolic splendor (I even spelled it right this time):
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardi/
Obviously, this is a picture that relies
Did you set the camera to release with lenses without an A position on
the lens, (custom function 16 if I remember correctly).
Kevin Waterson wrote:
I have a Porst 135mm 1.8-16 lense that I cannot get to work with
the *istD. I have tried all modes but the camera will not fire.
If it is set to M
The only f2.8's that come close to that range are the FA 28-70 and the
AF 35-70, that I know of anyway.
keller.schaefer wrote:
Does any body know of a Pentax 28-80/2,8 (!) sold only in the USA and
Switzerland - at least that is what the (Ebay) seller claims (and still
does, even after being
I'm fairly new to the list and was hoping I could get an explanation of the terms:
PAW and WOW.
I did not find terms on the PDML FAQ and hoped to 'get a clue' from the group.
Thanks,
Cedric Milan
- Original Message -
From: Cedric
Subject: Explanation of terms
I'm fairly new to the list and was hoping I could get an
explanation of the terms:
PAW and WOW.
PAW: Whats on the end of my dog's legs.
WOW: What I say when I see my wife.
Seriously, PAW is Picture A Week, and is
PAW = Picture a Week: List members can post photos made
with any gear for comments criticism or suggestions, or just
for fun.
WOW = Workshop of the Week: List members post photos that
they would like some editing help with, maybe Photoshop
adjustments, and so on. Other listers make the
They both have the same optical formula, which is best probably boils
down to sample variation. You'll
like the manual focus feel of the A/50 much better than the FA.
William Robb wrote:
Optically, what are the differences between the A/50mm f/1.4 and the
FA50mm f/1.4?
Thanks
William Robb
A direct link:
http://www.research.philips.com/InformationCenter/Global/FNewPressRelease.asp?lArticleId=2904lNodeId=13
S
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
The future may be very exciting, optically at least.
http://www.research.philips.com/InformationCenter/Global/FHomepage.asp?lNodeId=13lArticleId=
It's the MZ-6 in Europe. Many of your nomenclature questions can be
answered here:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
Keith Whaley wrote:
I'm going to leave a little more of the previous messages than I
usually do, for continuity.
I'm a little confused here.
Has to do with camera body
--- Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: That's a great National Geographic photo.
The
style seems to be out
of favor but I like them.
Larry Hodgson wrote:
Below is a link to a shot that I made yesterday
(Saturday). This is called
Horseshoe Bend and is on the Colorado River just
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Whats the better 50mm
They both have the same optical formula, which is best probably
boils
down to sample variation. You'll
like the manual focus feel of the A/50 much better than the FA.
William Robb wrote:
Optically,
The SF1/SFX and SF1n/SFXn cameras, the series that introduced the RTF
TTL flash to the SLR world, were nevertheless criticized (in reviews,
at least) for the limited film range the flash was useable with: ASA
25-400. Does this mean that the flash won't fire at all with ASA 800
film in the
Okay,
after all this (very diverting, amusing interesting!) I will reveal my
true self ;-) here:
http://www.MurderAtTheRegistry.com
Of course it's very unhip 80ties Postpunk-stuff, but who cares - not me
:-)
There are also some mp3s to download, albeit not the latest ones.
And of course:some
You are in serious trouble now...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly new to the list and was hoping I could get an explanation of the terms:
PAW and WOW.
I did not find terms on the PDML FAQ and hoped to 'get a clue' from the group.
Thanks,
Cedric Milan
Intereting. Its eems to me photography looks more like the human eye fvery
day - first the digital sensor, then the lens!
all the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15.
Trying again:
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 6:25 PM
Subject: OT: Damn Windows!
Dear friends,
I've got a silly problem with Windows 98, and I hope someboby will be able
to suggest me a solution. In
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 10:12:47 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
WOW: What I say when I see my wife.
You see. You can be diplomatic when you want to be! :-)
John
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
That begins to make sense. I will have to run sum numbers and see if I can not
get my head around it.
Bob Blakely wrote:
The energy dispersion math relates to angle. f/(N/2) is the cotangent of an
angle.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you are
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Peter J. Alling wrote:
down to sample variation. You'll
like the manual focus feel of the A/50 much better than the FA.
Except if you are me :-)
Kostas
Surely you mean Drama, my good man. Take off that high hat, opera cape, and
the monocular. You are fooling no one.
--
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hopalong Cassidy never struck me as a drama.
Ryan Lee wrote:
My lecturer/tutor at uni, Dr Alan Mckee, author of Australian Television: A
Geneaology of
Some of the results are awesome as I tried a bit the other day and got no
where close to what some of the guys did. I'm getting the impression though
that some of you had a better original file to work with then the original
one posted. Did you send a bigger version to the participants Kevin?
Um...
As all good magicians, we don't really give away our secrets.
But since it's you asking...:-)
The first thing to do is always to make a copy of the background layer.
If in doubt, you can then always take a look at the original by just turning
off the visibility of the copy. With Kevin's
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Joe Wilensky wrote:
The SF1/SFX and SF1n/SFXn cameras, the series that introduced the RTF
TTL flash to the SLR world, were nevertheless criticized (in reviews,
at least) for the limited film range the flash was useable with: ASA
25-400. Does this mean that the flash won't
Welcome back, Don.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:20 PM
Subject: P: C-41 Tetenal Tabs Kit continued
I see I omitted to say in the previous post that one dose of 150 ml is
enough, according
I don't get it.
Nor do I. Nothing amusing there.
Those of us in technology will only photograph tucows at a time.
:)
Collin
Thanks, Peter. I actually knew that, but it didn't pop up when I was
thinking about the various names. A minor retrieval problem...faulty
RAM, you know.
keith
Peter J. Alling wrote:
It's the MZ-6 in Europe. Many of your nomenclature questions can be
answered here:
I get it ... not funny ... perhaps more a contemporary
homage to Dorothea Lange than a joke.
John Francis wrote:
I don't get it.
Nor do I. Nothing amusing there.
In addition to keeping up with e-mail, deleting spam, checking for viruses,
miscellaneous software upgrades, I now feel that I have to download and install a
Pentax Program a Week.
Joe
All for sale, but hoping to sell as complete outfit:
67II w/ AE prism, strap, cap
Excellent cond.
6x7 w/ prism, polaroid back, 2 standard backs, strap, cap Bargain cond.
400/4 Takumar w/case, caps
jtainter a écrit :
In addition to keeping up with e-mail, deleting spam, checking for viruses, miscellaneous software upgrades, I now feel that I have to download and install a Pentax Program a Week.
and ..
PRA
I want download Pentax Remote Assistant !
A friend of mine (who owns Ferraris) says: Porsches have no soul. To him
they are too functional and lack the style and soul of his Italian works
of art. Personally, I've always liked the 911 and all its derivatives.
Another friend, who has had the chance to drive many cars in a spirited
Thanks Jos.
I bought a big bag of outdated film a month or so ago thinking it would last
a while. But it's going faster than I thought possible. I'll have to find
more soon. But I do have a dozen or so chromes -- Astia -- and as soon as I
get chemicals I'll be able to try it out.
By the way and
Hi folks,
since der komkon server seems to be down again I decided to put at least the
March PUG on my own website.
This means:
Some links on this page are NOT!!! working.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of March.
Since I changed some typos
Looks like there is a Dorothea Lange in Germany - and the images are a
joke compared to the real ones.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http:\\www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: mike.wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Ryan,
Hopalong Cassidy ('49) was probably more of a kids show than a drama that aired in the
evening for adults. The Lone Ranger and Hoppy were the start of kids merchandising
tie-ins. But they were dramas for Saturday morning TV, when the kids were home from
school. Of course, Howdy Doody
Larry,
I agree with Tom. It's a wonderful shot. I like it so much that I put a copy into
the rotation I use for wallpaper. Will you be printing big copies of it for sale?
Regards, Bob S.
Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes:
--- Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: That's a great
Bob S. wrote:
Larry,
I agree with Tom. It's a wonderful shot. I like it so much that I put a
copy into the rotation I use for wallpaper. Will you be printing big
copies of it for sale?
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks again to all for the kind words on HorseShoe Bend.
Bob, I'll be getting an Epson
H... That would work on t-shirts, Bill. You'd sell a boatload of 'em.
g
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dreaming of a UPS free world.
Neither my MX nor LX have Av or Tv dials. No menus either. Perhaps I got
defective samples. I'll write to Pentax Canada and axe. vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: mapson [EMAIL
Now you tell me.
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course I am talking about *istD and the menu on the back.
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is why I am hesitant to report this Adelheid: hen I click on my
submission, I see there are three photographs on the page. The second
and third are not mine.
But thanks for doing this, the photo's load very fast.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:38, Peter J. Alling wrote:
As this is above and
Hi,
George Pake died recently. He led the team at Xerox PARC that produced the Star
system, the forerunner of all the commercial GUI/WIMP systems we now
use.
http://news.independent.co.uk/people/obituaries/story.jsp?story=501284
While surfing around just now looking for information about him, I
They were hoping you'd buy four.
John
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:39:43 -0800, Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is quite common to have 2 names for some Pentax cameras, but 4???
What were they thinking?
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Let it be clear g, MZ-6, ZX-L, ZX-6, and
Cesar and Malcolm,
Actually, I do many of my own bike repairs. That's one thing about track
bikes - not much to go wrong/replace. A new chain (I have a chain breaker)
every couple of months or so (time to get one, BTW), along with a daily
clean and oil of the chain is about it.
But, yeah, I
AFAIK, the human eye does not alter its focal length by changing it's
shape. It doesn't alter it's focal length at all! Unless I'm in the
minority in being unable to zoom in and out. g
I guess they meant focus?
Or maybe they meant that (no matter what the human eye does) their lenses
will
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: RE: My discovery ;-)
Neither my MX nor LX have Av or Tv dials. No menus either.
Perhaps I got
defective samples. I'll write to Pentax Canada and axe. vbg
They both certainly have Av and TV dials, though no menus.
If yours are
frank theriault wrote:
AFAIK, the human eye does not alter its focal length by changing it's
shape. It doesn't alter it's focal length at all! Unless I'm in the
minority in being unable to zoom in and out. g
you can't??? you must be kidding. the next thing you'll tell us that you
focus your
Not my taste, I'm afraid.
I think it would be a nice shot left bw. The comp's really nice. I find
the coloured keys a distraction.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: David Madsen [EMAIL
These guys are really starting to piss me off. They were down last week for
several days, IIRC. I put up my PAW on Saturday evening, and about an hour
after they posted, down again. Yesterday morning, still down. Going
yesterday afternoon and evening.
Now, down again for the last couple of
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: My discovery ;-)
Just went and checked. No Av dial. No Tv dial.
I'm quite certain that I got bad cameras.
I recall that I got the MX from you. Can I have a refund?
Nope, that MX went out the door with a TV dial, you must
thermal noise will cause pixels to be bright enough to seem like a hot pixel
on a long enough exposure. dark field subtraction can remove only pixels
that hot in the dark field. if the actual exposure has bright pixels
different from the dark field, they will remain. Photoshop can detect these
and
I spend too much money for an unlimited Earthlink account. 10 meg of
webspace for each e-mail address and I'm allowed to create up to 7
for the price of one. On the upside I can post just about anything I
want to.
frank theriault wrote:
These guys are really starting to piss me off. They
I'm not offended or confused, I'm in pain!
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
At 16:40 2004.03.15 -0500, you wrote:
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARR.
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Those of us in technology will only photograph tucows at a time.
:)
On 15 Mar 2004 at 18:39, frank theriault wrote:
AFAIK, the human eye does not alter its focal length by changing it's
shape. It doesn't alter it's focal length at all! Unless I'm in the
minority in being unable to zoom in and out. g
I guess they meant focus?
No, it changes it's FL by
Fellow biker Frank,
Yes, I also got annoyed at not getting in to photo.net.
Last week, a post by Jens Bladt took me to
http://fotopic.net/
It looks alright, or maybe even good, as they are lots of customising stuff.
I registered for an account, but haven't yet made any use of it.
Good luck,
they weren't making a lot of sounds when i was watching them. i'm still
learning about birding, so i would have to sit and study them as opposed to
concentrating on taking the photos. it took about an hour of standing beside
the car before they got comfortable enough to come as close as they did.
On Mar 15, 2004, at 5:36 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Must have been aerodynamics or suspension or something, because I
refuse to believe that those big Chevy V8's could move the cars as
fast as that Turbo.
It wasn't aerodynamics. In truth, it's not hard to make well over 1000
horsepower with
But surely if it is a hot pixel then it will always be hot at that
exposure? If it was only hot for one of the two frames then it must
have been an error in the data rather than a stuck hot pixel. It is my
understanding that the dark frame exposure is the same 'shutter' time as
the main shot, so
there are other pixels coming through bright enough to register as hot
because of thermal noise. note that the test program is using a pretty
liberal definition of hot. thermal noise can be pretty high on some sensors.
look at the actual TIFF image and see just how bright they are. it takes
some
As a work-around solution, I suggest you get yourself a pen and a couple
of sticky labels.
S
frank theriault wrote:
Just to make certain, I went and put a lens (it was a Pentax lens, just
to make sure there are no compatibilty problems) on and off each body
several times. I didn't see
Another world 1st I supposed? g
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
They were hoping you'd buy four.
John
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2 months FREE*
How about pink colour LIMITED for ladies?
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Pentax's marketing strategy has been revealed.
Now they have to think up something else.
Way to go John.
_
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
