On Aug 5, 2013, at 0:09, ketut.nur...@dexagroup.com wrote:
dear Samba team,
Today we have used samba ver. 3 as primary domain controller at my
company. To improve the Samba technology and feature to support our
business , we want to upgrade to Samba 4.
Is there any tools or support
On Aug 10, 2013, at 4:22, Andrew Bartlett abart...@samba.org wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 03:19 -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On Aug 5, 2013, at 0:09, ketut.nur...@dexagroup.com wrote:
dear Samba team,
Today we have used samba ver. 3 as primary domain controller at my
company
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Fernando Lozano
ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
But you know, everyone buys NASes today, it's getting harder to explaing a
common PC would be better. Here a server box with a RAID controller and a
hot-swappable disk bays is way more expensive than an iomega NAS
On 5/26/2013 3:10 PM, Michael De Groote wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to set up dfs for (among other things) profiles (i don't know if
this is a good example, but that is out of the scope of my current question)
I've been following these instructions:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Jeremy Allison j...@samba.org wrote:
Samba Team Releases Samba 4.0
=
Congrats!
--
Peace and Blessings,
-Scott.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
Hi Scott, hi everyone
Yeah, that's fine.
Does this clear up the issue with the ':'? I should have made it clearer
that I was referring to autofs and not mounting e.g. from fstab. I just
tried the automounter on cifs without the
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax (server:/share),
instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share || \\server\share), that
support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version 6.0 of the mount.cifs
utility.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
On 10/18/2012 2:07 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
no one has objected (or really said anything). Can we merge this patch?
--
Hi
I'm just trying to represent users. Can we
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM, steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 07:02 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:47:37 +0200
steve st...@steve-ss.com wrote:
On 10/23/2012 05:56 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Currently, we have this map: * -fstype=cifs,rw,sec=krb5
://myserver
The following patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax
(server:/share), instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share ||
\\server\share), that support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version
6.0 of the mount.cifs utility.
The reasoning for this is simple. Support for NFS
From: Scott Lovenberg scott.lovenb...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Scott Lovenberg scott.lovenb...@gmail.com
---
mount.cifs.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mount.cifs.c b/mount.cifs.c
index 756fce2..061ce32 100644
--- a/mount.cifs.c
+++ b/mount.cifs.c
On 10/18/2012 1:50 PM, scott.lovenb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Scott Lovenbergscott.lovenb...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Scott Lovenbergscott.lovenb...@gmail.com
---
mount.cifs.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mount.cifs.c b/mount.cifs.c
index
This patch adds a warning when using NFS mounting syntax (server:/share),
instead of the usual UNC syntax (//server/share || \\server\share), that
support for NFS style mounts will be removed in version 6.0 of the mount.cifs
utility.
The reasoning for this is simple. Support for NFS syntax
From: Scott Lovenberg scott.lovenb...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Scott Lovenberg scott.lovenb...@gmail.com
---
mount.cifs.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mount.cifs.c b/mount.cifs.c
index 756fce2..061ce32 100644
--- a/mount.cifs.c
+++ b/mount.cifs.c
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Karolin Seeger ksee...@samba.org wrote:
[...]
- Domain member support in the 'samba' binary is in it's infancy, and
is not comparable to the support found in winbindd. As such, do not
use the 'samba' binary (provided for the AD server) on a member
On 3/9/2012 2:05 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
From both the shameless self-promotion and better late
than never departments here at Samba towers :-).
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2012/03/geek-time-with-andrew-tridgell.html
It's a fun interview (at least I think so :-).
Enjoy !!!
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Derek Simkowiak der...@realloc.net wrote:
I can mount it using these options in /etc/fstab... note the use of
setuids here:
//cst6/testhome /testhome cifs
iocharset=utf8,credentials=/root/cst6_password.txt,setuids 0 0
Does it work if you change 'setuids'
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Scott Lovenberg
scott.lovenb...@gmail.comwrote:
The client code has been moved out of the samba package recently. In the
current release of the client (the client is now released separately from
the samba suite, but the two aren't in sync yet) the setuid
Karl Koch wrote:
hello,
i use samba with acl bound into a w2k3 ads domain.
i have set the option inherit acls = yes and when i change a acl on a
folder the new folders i create have the same acls.
But when i change the acl on a folder the subdirectorys of this folder
wont update automatic
jerry wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fyi...
We can into some db connection issues last night (about
10pm GMT-5 I think). This issue has been temporarily
resolved, but I expect that we'll be taking the server
offline for a short period sometime this week for further
db
As well as nodiratime.
--Original Message--
From: Miguel Medalha
Sender: samba-bounces+scott.lovenberg=gmail@lists.samba.org
To: naga_kishore_komm...@yahoo.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Query related to samba-3.2.6 and Last Access Time stamp.
Sent: Apr 6, 2009
Ross, Brian wrote:
Yes, another newbie asking for help. Please bear with me. I don't doubt my
problem has a simple solution but it has me stumped.
I have a solaris server which carries some confidential financial information on it. I
have been asked to install samba on it to share out a
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all !
I have a PDC and a BDC in 2 differents subnets.
I would like to sync their browse list but it doesn't seem to work.
Actually here are a part my smb.conf files :
PDC
--
...
remote browse sync = 10.10.20.10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all !
I have a PDC and a BDC in 2 differents subnets.
I would like to sync their browse list but it doesn't seem to work.
Actually here are a part my smb.conf files :
PDC
--
...
remote browse sync = 10.10.20.10
remote announce =
Scheidegger Patrick wrote:
Hello
I have problem with a access application, when I try to start the
application then I must wait 5 minutes ago before he started.
I do this from a WinXp Workstation to a Linux Debian Etch and samba
3.0.24 installation.
What can I do for better performance.
that samba doesn't like?
Any other ideas?
Thanks for the input!
*/JC/*
On Oct 5, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86.
I require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct
Jesse Stone wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has run across that and MUCH more importantly, if
the data can be recovered somehow.
I'll put as much details as I can at the bottom but here's the gist of the
problem:
I added my wives computer (which contains 8 years worth of pictures) to the
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86. I
require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct default location, under Solaris 10.
Example, from ./configure --help:
--with-krb5=base-dirLocate Kerberos 5
Jake Carroll wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently attempting to compile Samba 3.2.4 for Solaris 10 x86. I
require krb5 support and I realised that it would not look in the
correct default location, under Solaris 10.
Example, from ./configure --help:
--with-krb5=base-dirLocate Kerberos 5
Avery Payne wrote:
hamacker wrote:
I did that.
I test, and everything is OK.
It's not misconfiguration.
When 2 NICs bonded (or 2 NICs only enabled), WinXP can logon into
domain and win95/98 can not. If I disable one NIC then any OS can
logon into domain.
I can't understand why WinXP can
Lin Mac wrote:
hi,
I would like to know is it possible to make writing file to samba completely
in kernel?
I'm using a slow CPU (FA526) , and the memory copy is even slower. The
reading performance is over 7 MB/s, with mmap and sendfile enabled, while
writing is only 4-5 MB/s. Without
Cory Coager wrote:
So its not possible to use variables for the 'subpath' option?
Damien Dye wrote:
I don't think that will work because homes is dynamic I believe that
the snapshots have to be mounted at the root of the share and homes
has the root of the share at /home/username you have the
Jeff L wrote:
Samba version 3.0.25b-1.1.cc
I cant seem to transfer files over 40gb from a windows machine -- samba share.
as far as socket options im using
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_KEEPALIVE
Is there any other tweaks I can use to help make this system
Jason A. Nunnelley wrote:
Is anyone here running Samba 3.0 successfully with an NT4 style
domain, with the Samba box operating as the PDC?
Yes, indeed. For a little over two years now. CentOS-4.X based,
Slackware-10.2 - 12.0, and at one point Debian Sarge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have some problem, with a new configuration on a new PC.
I want to setup a SAMBA PDC using an HOWTO.
This howto was working on OPENSUSE 10.1 with a X86 processor and I have used it
a lot of time.
Now I use OPENSUSE 10.3.
The new PC run a X64 processor.
After
access attempts?
Selon Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I believe you need a |map to guest = bad user and/or guest account =
nobody for anonymous access to be automated.|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have some problem, with a new configuration on a new PC.
I want to setup
[...]
If you don't want LDAP you have to use the smbpasswd way.
(and LDAP leads to other problems ...)
Also, the same users have their home directories shared via AFP
(which works fine) and I can't complicate the setup with an
additional smbpasswd file.
How and where does AFP
Mohammed El-Afifi wrote:
I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting as a client. I've
installed samba-client 3.2.0 from a binary package. I amn't running the server
portion of samba(smbd, nmbd, or even winbindd).
I'm trying to access shares on another windows machine, on the same
Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi Scott,
thanks for the reply.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 05:39 -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Have you tried using the 'nss_ldap' with the entry 'ldap' in your
nsswitch.conf? I found that to be the best way
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi Scott,
thanks for the reply.
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 05:39 -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Have you tried using the 'nss_ldap' with the entry 'ldap' in your
nsswitch.conf? I found
Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi,
sorry, it's me again:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:35 +0200, Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi again,
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 13:31 +0200, Samba-Liste wrote:
Hi,
I read at least 100 different documentations during the last week and
didn't get it. So I decided to ask the list
Russell Curtis wrote:
Hi Guys
It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
Basically, we have a problem when users have Offline Files enabled
in Windows XP. When they log off, create or modify a file,
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Russell Curtis wrote:
Hi Guys
It saddens me to say so, but I'm going to have to order a copy of
Windows Server unless I can get this issue of offline files resolved.
Basically, we have a problem when users have Offline Files enabled
in Windows XP. When they log off
Doug Tucker wrote:
Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a
simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file
system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write
access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of
Marcus Sobchak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
are there any know problems with f-secure scanner and roaming profiles?
We have a lot of users with problems syncing their roaming profile from
the domain server. It seems to be a problem with f-secure's on-access
scanning (may be timeout problem?).
Brian Cowan wrote:
Hi All,
I have a Samba system I fire up once in a blue moon for testing, and
had a bit of a minor heart attack when it suddenly stopped letting
me access shares as anyone other than root. Security is set to user
since it's not a domain member server. My office requires
iLinux wrote:
Thanks but no help
John Drescher-2 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:08 AM, iLinux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a samba version 3.024 server
That is an old version (3.0.30 is current) but it probably is not the
problem.
vary slow file transfer when
Robert wrote:
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, John Drescher wrote:
We have a domain with more than 100 users and we need to replace our PDC.
The PDC main function is to authenticate our users to connect to the
shared drive and to authenticate computer login. The PDC is running
samba with
Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:38:37PM +0200, Deon Steyn wrote:
Is it possible to run Samba on Xp Pro
No.
You could run Samba in a *nix VM sitting on top of a XP host.
Performance is going to suck, but it can be done.
Greg
If you go this route, make sure to
Jason Greene wrote:
smbd version 3.0.25b-0.4E.5
Our server was functioning very well for several months. Our SAN crapped
out and the LUN the server was using was gone. Everything is back up except
SAMBA is acting crazy.
I am looking at the logs and I am getting
/var/log/samba/winbindd.log
Jason Greene wrote:
I take it back... winbind is taking 99% of the CPU again
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I reinstalled Samba and that cleared up the issue. Thanks for the
response.
Jason
Could you provide
L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
Also try to set you nic fixed speeds.
and your profile is 1.1. MB ?? thats very very small.
a normal profile is about 10-25 Mb.
Louis
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Greg Koch
Verzonden: dinsdag 27 mei 2008
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/28/2008, Scott Lovenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Also, I've found that roaming profiles seem to choke when you've got
lots of very small files. Those files are usually in local settings
under the profile, but not always.
Roaming Profiles do NOT contain *anything
Charles Marcus wrote:
DNS was my kneejerk reaction, too, but I thought that it would be
good to mention small files which may or may not be in local
settings.
Another thought that just occurred, there seems to be a significant
speed difference when the Web Client service is turned off. Many
ScottZ wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Samba] Somewhat bizzare share issue
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, May 23, 2008 10:21 am
To: ScottZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Michael Heydon [EMAIL PROTECTED], samba@lists.samba.org
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at
Iris Lames wrote:
Hi,
I'm using samba-3.0.28-0.fc8. I'm trying to build a file server for 100
users. I created a perl script that automatically adds the 100 users plus
their passwords with success. Now I'm having difficulty creating a script
using the smbpasswd command because passwords must be
Michael Heydon wrote:
Jack Lauman wrote:
snip
I compared the open files with one computer in Lacerte vs. two
computers in Lacerte and noticed one thing peculiar: when one computer
is using Lacerte, all files are opened with exclusive+batch oplocks
including Data1i07.dbf, however when 2
Oliver Weinmann wrote:
Dear All,
I came across a really strange behaviour when using winbind on solaris 8.
Normally nscd should be turned off because it's causing problems in the
username resolution etc. When I turn it off I can login e.g. using ssh as an
AD users but when i start a command
Rick Johnson wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Rick Johnson wrote:
Adam Williams wrote:
what are the settings on the share you're trying to mount? does it
have something like valid users = rickj
Well, that is hard to determine. If you're asking whether the drive
has something like an smb.conf
Rick Johnson wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Rick Johnson wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Rick Johnson wrote:
Adam Williams wrote:
what are the settings on the share you're trying to mount? does
it have something like valid users = rickj
Well, that is hard to determine. If you're asking
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Rick Johnson wrote:
Toby Bluhm wrote:
Rick Johnson wrote:
Adam Williams wrote:
what are the settings on the share you're trying to mount? does
it have something like valid users = rickj
Well, that is hard to determine. If you're asking whether the drive
has
Paulo Almeida wrote:
Hi,
After a serious power failure two days ago and a abrupt shutdown
of our Samba server, i noticed today that winbind could not get info
on some users from a Win2003 AD.
wbinfo -u work fine;
wbinfo -g work fine;
but, for example:
wbinfo -i ep2025 returns
Could not get
Matt Richardson wrote:
Is it possible to take a SSHA password from an ldif and create a
proper sambaNTpassword from it? Here's the scenario: the ldap
servers in our organization do not have the samba schema installed and
the likelihood of that happening is slim. I still want to provide
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:13:28AM -0500, James A. Dinkel wrote:
Anyway, the server will be fine and snappy for a week or so, then out of
the blue, nobody can connect. Top shows a few smbd processes maxing out
the cpu and the load (which is usually 1.0) gradually
Brantley Allen wrote:
Samba appears to be running ok, but I cannon authenticate from Windows.
Winbindd doesn't appear to be anywhere on my system.
Should I load a 2.2.6 or an older version that works with SCO
OpenServer?
Brantley
What happens when you try to start the winbindd
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Elvar wrote:
|
| Just an update on this. I recompiled and installed putting in 600 as
the
| max simultaneous clients since they have 550 computers. After having
| done that, internet connectivity was working great for
Ash Gosh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Ash Gosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I need to create a share that will be readoble by root only (by owner) and
writeable for all. We replacing a dead Windows NT 4.0 server and there was a
permission type called Add and our users uses this
Ash Gosh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I did this once a couple of years ago using NT style policy and
the firewall policy object. IIRC, I did it all at the file system level;
each computers' SYSTEM service was allowed to write
Alan Bunch wrote:
I am currently running Red Hat v 3 samba rpm's.
samba-common-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
samba-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
samba-client-3.0.9-1.3E.14.3
I would like to run the current release version to see if I can clean up
some of the problems I am having. File locking and not releasing are
the
Robert Pollard wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to connect to Samba over the Internet as I have static IP
that is publicly available for connection. I can use this IP to connect to our
Intranet web site but Samba doesn't work correctly when trying to connect to it
from outside. Our internal
Hector Blanco wrote:
Shouldn't it? I mean...Taking a look to the output produced by
smbldap-useradd -? it says -w is a windows machine account
(otherwise, posix stuff only) or something similar... I don't have
the exact output right now.
As far as I understand, it should add all the Samba
JJB wrote:
Forced Election:
In workgroup WORKGROUP when announced server was:
SYSTEM-1 (192.168.1.248) : 50 Time(s)
SYSTEM-2 (192.168.1.183) : 2 Time(s)
SYSTEM-3 (192.168.1.248) : 1 Time(s)
Cannot get workgroup name from domain name browser:
192.168.1.153 : 96 Time(s)
Ryan Bair wrote:
I have single directories with over 100,000 entries and about 4
million files on the system total spanning about 15TB. I don't think
you should have a problem. Only problem I have is that directory
listings take a while with 100K entries but that's to be expected.
On Mon, Mar
Yan Seiner wrote:
I built an embedded box which uses mount.cifs to mount network
shares.I've shipped several of these and all are working fine
except for one, which gives me permission denied on certain files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/mnt/bgrp1/c/Ballance Group Folders/Scully/Client
Dave Kempe wrote:
gianfranco pra floriani wrote:
using ip address (\\10.0.0.7) does not change anything in response time.
then it might not be wins/name resolution at all.
Perhaps a packet sniffer might shed some light on it?
run tethereal Or tshark as its not called on the tun interface on
Chris wrote:
We have a DLink DNS-323 NAS box. It uses Samba internally.
Whenever I map a drive to the NAS box using Windows Explorer, it gets
intermittently slow to browse any drive. Even clicking in the c:\
drive will cause a pause of several seconds. If I unmap the drive the
problem goes
Dean Guenther wrote:
Greetings,
Since rebooting our samba server last night, we are no longer able to
access the documents on the private or public file shares. A Word document
is giving an error like:
The document name or path is not valid. Try these suggestions:
* check the file
joop gerritse wrote:
I have posted more messages, essentially to the same effect... had quite a few
good answers, but somehow I seem to be missing something ... :-(
Well, I told you already about the workgroup DAARO, which refused to show
up... I got some suggestions, and, indeed, there it
joop gerritse wrote:
Hello, *
After some good advice from the list, I now have my workgroup visible. Next
problem.
I click on it from my win98 station (yes, it is old; I even have a w95
workstation somewhere :-) ) and I get can't find share name.
Now I look in the samba logs, and I see
John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Adam Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a PDC named GOMER w/ IP of 10.8.3.37 and a BDC named BLDG2 w/ ip
of 10.8.7.2. when someone on the 10.8.7.x network using the WINS server
of 10.8.7.2 logs in and out, their roaming profile
Douglas VanLeuven wrote:
Adam Zimmer wrote:
At the moment I have enabled timeSync with vmware tools.
In the general area of time keeping on the host, I added the following
settings which avoided errors about the RTC missing interrupts:
host.usefastclock=false
host.cpukHz=240
Suphakit wrote:
Thank you Mr.William, as you know I am a linux beginner ,meaning that I
am not familiar with technical terms that's why I can't get myself
understand the howto stuffs. The posted question is a myth to me which
I couldn't extract of out of many instruction found from website.
Tim Bates wrote:
Hello people
Just wondering how people deal with deletion of roaming profiles and
homes on their servers.
I currently have a script that moves old homes for one subset of our
users... but it's very messy. I'm considering re-writing it, and
including the profile dirs too,
ip guy wrote:
hi all
my samba installation 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4, installed via yum on a CentOS5
sever seems to ignore the server string...
no matter what i supply the string variable, the drive is mapped to the
win32 clients and echo's the samba version.
anyone having the same issue ?
Have you
Paul Rijke wrote:
Hi,
I have currently a department called HRM which have their own share
/data/hrm
Within that share is a folder called recruitment.
We recently hired an external recruiter to do some work for us. The folder
is /data/hrm/recruitment
How can I enforce that
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
What are the samba server side settings(smb.conf) for the share you
are mounting?
[data]
comment = Shared Application Data Files
path = /srv/shares/data
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0666
directory mask = 0777
Do you
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available
Alex Hooper wrote:
Scott Lovenberg uttered:
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available to a collocated production
environment comprising
Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings-
I am working through coming up with a Linux client integration to Samba
PDC's.
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o
credentials=/home/userid/.smbcredentials,uid=userid,gid=userid,dmask=0777,fmask=0666
//ldslnx01/data
Michael Lueck wrote:
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Could it be that '/' is mounted with an explicit permission setting
that is shadowing your mount settings?
I do not think so, but have a look. This share happens to be on the /srv
partition.
/dev/sda1 / xfs defaults
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
That may be possible, but like I said, sometimes it works and sometimes it
doesn't. Sometimes the span between the two is only a few seconds.
From: Scott Lovenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:05 PM
To: Trimble, Ronald D
Cc: samba
Alex Hooper wrote:
Hi,
We have an office-based Windows-locked publishing system whose only
delivery mechanism is to write to a local filesystem, and a
requirement for its output to be available to a collocated production
environment comprising Solaris and Linux boxes. The 'obvious' solution
/Location
*From:* Scott Lovenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:27 PM
*To:* Trimble, Ronald D
*Cc:* samba@lists.samba.org
*Subject:* Re: [Samba] Problem with winbind not seeing a user as part
of a group
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
It looks like
to winbind for each session. Why do some
work and others don't? Could it be that winbind is overwhelmed and thus
doesn't return anything?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lovenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 9:09 PM
To: Trimble, Ronald D
Cc: samba
Ed Kasky wrote:
I am currently running Samba 3.0.28.0 from rpm on FC6. I have the
following in smb.conf:
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
Yet, when I start the daemons, I get log.%m:
drwx-- 4 root root 4096 Feb 12 06:55 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 root bin 4096 Feb 12 05:02 ..
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
Everyone,
Here is a challenge for all of you samba experts! Lately I
have been seeing a problem where winbind is not correctly identifying a user as
a member of a group he most certainly belong to. This is with a Domain Local
group so I know samba
On Feb 11, 2008 8:15 AM, Adam Tauno Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have something setup here (on a smaller scale) that might be
useful. Our main file server rsync's with our backup server every
hour (using hardlinks to keep snapshots). Since relatively little
data changes
On Feb 9, 2008 8:49 AM, markus neis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available
with
redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while
doing this:
If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes
On Feb 9, 2008 3:01 PM, markus neis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i set oplocks = yes , kernel oplocks = yes and as I said locking = yes,
but this slows down everything
OK, from what I gather (which very well could be inaccurate), it looks like
you might be stuck on a spinlock timeout on a
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can
refute what you say ;-)
gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused.
No offense intended, but Scott's description is not really
correct.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
