The website has been down for some time now.
It keeps returning the message: Bandwidth Exceeded ... try again later.
It sounds like a pretty sophisticated theory that only a few can properly
assess. Does it make any testable predictions? Or does it provide any
insights into the CF/LENR results
Thanks, Brad
That link works.
However, the theory rests on QCD (quantum chromodynamics) which I do not
understand. For those trained in QCD, it might be worth
google-translating the more detailed Russian web page:
http://viktor19451.narod.ru/
Aside from the diagrams, the translation looks
have not really seen related material before.
Hopefully, some more elementary introductory papers are available. If I
find any, I will post pointers to them. Do you know of any?
Regards,
Lou Pagnucco
Thanks for posting this - and it is intriguing in one way but flawed in
another - certainly
Pagnucco
At 11:53 PM 1/16/2012, you wrote:
I asked a close
friend (PhD physicist) and he said the same thing as Krivit; that fusion
[...]
Now, W-L theory predicts *lots* of transmutations. These are not
observed to be correlated with the heat. Transmutations are indeed
observed, but at levels way
My questions were motivated by definition #4 in the patent which refers to
deuterating the crystal, but it is clear (I think) from the context that
this is still just as part of proposed small, conventional (hot) impact
fusion - not really cold fusion, at all. Fusion is not claimed to take
place
?
Does it overlap any current LENR approaches?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
* THE PATENT + EXCERPTS *
HIGH ENERGY CRYSTAL GENERATORS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
Patent 7741615 Issued on June 22, 2010.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7741615/fulltext.html
Abstract
Ferroelectric, pyroelectric
New possibilities for developing minimal mass, extremely sensitive,
collective many-body, quantum mechanical neutrino 'antennas'
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-collective-manybody-qm-neutrino-antennasjan-10-2012
A pretty venturesome proposal. It seems testable.
The
In nanowires, conductance itself can change in a complex nonmonotonic,
nonlinear way as a function of current density. For example, see --
Quantum Suppression of the Rayleigh Instability in Nanowires
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0006237
James Bowery wrote:
Something that occurs to me about
on Widom-Larsen theory.
It looks quite reasonable to me, but I could be mistaken.
I would appreciate corrections or criticisms.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
[1] Stability of Metal Nanowires at Ultrahigh Current Densities
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0411058
Horace, thanks for the reply. You wrote:
You should keep in mind that in nanowires, even (laser induced)
thermal pulses move at 2x10^6 m/s, the conduction band electron speed.
Yes. There are electron-lattice mechanical couplings
(e.g,, pinches, phonons, ...) that complicate a simple,
Horace,
You parse comments way too precisely.
I should have said that your observations raise questions.
For instance, a key one is -
The WL math and QM is possibly controversial (e.g. via Hagelstein and
Chaudhary), but the logic and common sense in problem definition and
conclusions are
the threshhold as well.
Are these assumptions reasonable? Is this check on W-L theory correct?
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
[1] EMP AND HPM SUPPRESSION TECHNIQUES - http://dodreports.com/ada360541
I agree, Jed.
Forbes has deep enough pockets to send Mark Gibbs, along with a
technically sophisticated companion, to a lab claiming CF or LENR
anomalous energy or transmutation evidence. He should publicly issue a
challenge to CF/LENR researchers to allow him to witness and monitor
their
Yes, but watching paint dry is ultra-exciting if the payoff is trillion$.
Gibbs appears to be happy writing Forbes filler-pieces.
He should get more creative.
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes. It would be Win-Win-Win.
Courtesy of coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
Edmund Storms on The Nuclear Active Environment and Metals That Work
coldfusionnow.wordpress.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SorcxYf8VYg
He discusses Rossi, F-P, Piantelli, Ni-H, Pd-H
Title: WordPress.com
So why doesn't he throw down the gauntlet?
How hard is that??
Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 11:56 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Anyone who has CF/LENR tech that they are confident in would certainly
be
happy to have it showcased in Forbes.
You'd think so. So why has it
Lewis Larsen considers some of the criticisms of LENR theory by CF
dogmatists ironic.
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cold-fusioneers-new-ploy-ad-hoc-redefinition-of-technical-term-fusiondec-30-2011
Too bad it's human nature to form opposing-warring factions.
Perhaps some relic of
Daniel, you may be correct.
I do not know.
However, both Akito Takahashi and Hideo Kozima may regard W-L viable.
See -- Second Cold Fusion Theorist Cites Widom-Larsen Theory
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/23/second-cold-fusion-theorist-cites-widom-larsen-theory/
Takahashi appears to
Again, I am not sure.
Looking at the slide on p.105 at JCF12 Abstracts at--
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2011/JCF12/JCF12ExtendedAbstracts.pdf
-- I see the reaction 59Ni + e- 59Co + v + Q
I cannot read Japanese, but this looks like a heavy electron capture,
but that is just a
Larsen has a website with slide presentations at:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen
He provides a lot of hypotheses which could be tested for what seems
modest expense. Most would involve looking for transmutations - which
would be a lot less contentious than calorimetry results.
Many have
?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
.
--- The patent application seems to cover quite a wide range of
implementations.
Unless this is a different Steven Jones, did he become a believer 14-years
after the 1989 CF-brouhaha?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
.
--- The patent application seems to cover quite a wide range of
implementations.
Unless this is a different Steven Jones, did he become a believer
14-years
after the 1989 CF-brouhaha?
Any insights?
Lou Pagnucco
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Horace,
Thanks for the comment.
What is needed are some toy models with some simple simulations.
I will check out your theory.
Do you believe any new physics is required
- or does standard QM suffice?
I am getting pretty boggled by the complexity of it all.
LP
There is no need for
Good information. Thanks for posting.
Possibly relevant to LENR, but too complicated to be sure.
Masahiro Hotta has other papers on this at --
http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/AND+au:+Hotta_Masahiro+abs:+energy/0/1/0/all/0/1
His more recent paper --
Quantum Energy Teleportation: An
I think that the frequency of the outgoing down-converted photons will
remain the same whether the incoming high frequency photon is absorbed by
one atom or collectively by N-atoms. A coherent multi-atom absorption
will create a Schroedinger-Cat-like state of one excited atom and (N-1)
ground
reactions to take any side in the controversy.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
National Instruments has an automated software package --
LabVIEW System Identification Toolkit
http://www.ni.com/pdf/labview/us/sys_id_toolkit.pdf
-- which (I assume) can converge to an optimal control strategy for an
unknown multi-input/multi-state system which may be non-linear, noisy and
If Sterling properly interpreted Rossi - i.e. -
According to Rossi, NI will be creating the controls to monitor and
regulate this process. He said that their stipulation for the agreement
is that all the instrumentation for the E-Cat plants have by National
Instruments and logo on the
A pretty counter-intuitive phenomenon.
So were super-conductivity and lasing.
I believe both emission and absorption of radiation can be strongly
enhanced in a volume of entangled (coherent) particles - even when it's
spatial extent is greater than the radiation wave-length.
See:
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs and Cold Fusion are Different Concepts - Dec 13 2011
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-and-cold-fusion-are-different-conceptsdec-13-2011
Joshua,
I believe, Zawodny does explain the creation of ULM neutrons through the
plasmonic creation of heavy electrons. See (slide 16) of
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/2010-Zawodny-AviationUnleashed.pdf
I am unsure as to whether Zawodny is correct, but page 9 of INTENSE
FOCUSING OF
?or others?
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
enhancement at metallic interfaces due to quantum confinement
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0714
Pardon if this has already been discussed on Vortex.
Comments appreciated,
Lou Pagnucco
-ph/0104035
Quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in an Unstable System with Two Bound
State
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502075
Reifenschweiler's results are a real puzzle.
Lou Pagnucco
In an experimental series performed by Piantelli, he observed the
production of either heat or gamma radiation
Lewis Larsen (Widom-Larsen) just posted a paper entitled:
Are LENRs causing some of the 'UFO' dust observed in the Large Hadron
Collider? Maybe somebody should look.
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llccould-lenrs-be-producing-ufos-in-large-hadron-colliderdec-7-2011
An
The Widom-Larsen transmutation experiments, e.g., electon beam impinging
on copper target (slides 21-23 in Widom's presentation [*]) certainly are
verifiable/falsifiable. It would be suprising if NASA's Bushnell has not
verified them. Many other credible researchers confirm them. Is it
Thanks, Robert
And, here is some forgotten LENR evidence from 1951 --
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs ca 1950s-Sternglass Expts-Einstein Bethe-Nov 25
2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-ca-1950ssternglass-exptseinstein-bethenov-25-2011
Maybe established theory has
Nanoparticles.
Vibronic Energy Technologies' upcoming presentation on Dec-7 may include
results using various approaches outlined in the patent application.
Comments?
Lou Pagnucco
A portion of the patent application follow:
Title: AMPLIFICATION OF ENERGETIC REACTIONS
Document Type and Number: WIPO Patent
I am not sure if it's relevant or what it's worth, but in the following
paper -
Anomalous Nuclear Phenomena Assocoated with Ultrafast Processes
www.iscmns.org/asti06/jianglaoshi2.pdf
- the authors speculate on whether the concept of torsion field
contributes to the LENR phenomena they observed
More controversy between LENR competitors ---
Lewis Larsen-Lattice Energy LLC-Comments re Mr. Andrea Rossi E-Cat
Technology-Nov 26 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lewis-larsenlattice-energy-llccomments-re-mr-andrea-rossi-ecat-technologynov-26-2011
The CONCLUSIONS slide (#34) states -
Weak Interaction LENR effects show the best prospects with the nuclear
burning of Ni proved possible with significant heating outputs.
It seems to me there is agreement on results, but not on theory, which is
encouraging.
Am I overlooking something?
Lou Pagnucco
More
Thanks Axil, Fran, Jones,
- for lots of intriguing information.
You have put lot of effort into this.
On the quantum entanglement/nonlocality issue - possibly relevant is:
Undetectable quantum transfer through a continuum
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2901 - but interesting even if not.
The Ni-64
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=512913
I don't think this has been posted to Vortex before.
I believe it describes Brian Ahern's approach to LENR.
Does this imply he believe Rossi's results?
Any comments?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
[...]
I don't think this has been posted to Vortex before.
I believe it describes Brian Ahern's approach to LENR.
Does this imply he believe Rossi's results?
Any comments?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
From: http://www.scribd.com/doc/55221791/Clean-Enenergy-From-Nano-Materials
/**START**
New Clean Energy
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
Also, since this is a NASA patent, doesn't it have to go through a fairly
rigorous review process? and have some empirical data backing it?
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:18 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Joshua,
If this is a real phenomenon, might it not involve complex many-body
effects that first-order approximations can't capture?
[...]
If there are some empirical data obtained by NASA on lenr or the WL
theory,
I would
.; (Poquoson, VA)
Assignee: USA as represented by the Administrator of NASA
I found it on Lewis Larsen's (Lattice Energy LLC) website at:
http://dev2.slideshare.com/lewisglarsen
Any opinions on whether this is relevant to any commercial LENR efforts?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
to account for the thermalization of
high-energy gammas or neutrons.
I welcome others' impressions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
reaction) rates, but does not appear to account for the thermalization of
high-energy gammas or neutrons.
I welcome others' impressions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
I am not an experimentalist, but is testing W-L theory expensive?
If we forget about measuring heat, several of Larsen's presentations may
provide enough details for experiments that could yield transmutations.
See, for example -
Lattice Energy LLC- Mystery of the Missing Nickel and
A couple of recent Widom-Larsen LENR presentations are at:
Lattice Energy LLC- Mystery of the Missing Nickel and Vanadium-Nov 6 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-lcc-mystery-of-the-missing-nickel-and-vanadiumnov-6-2011
Lattice Energy LLC Company Vision-September 11 2011
I omitted this recent Widom-Larsen LENR presentation:
Lattice Energy LLC-'Facts' about W-L Theory and LENRS-Oct 20 2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-facts-about-wl-theory-and-len-rsoct-20-2011
that (perhaps,
radial or spherical) symmetry.
Regards,
Lou Pagnucco
On 11/06/2011 02:49 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source
Probably, Robin, but the relatively recent discovery of the 65Fe isomer
(which likely has been lurking in the universe for a long time) makes me
wonder if other long-lived isomers have escaped attention, and written off
as statistical errors in mass measurements.
Coaxing 1 gram of 65Fe to ground
I am not sure which, if any, nickel isotopes admit isomeric states.
Perhaps, electrodes, container walls, or contaminants in nickel (or
palladium) could be the source of some yet unidentified isomers.
I am quite perplexed that isomeric-65Fe went undetected for so long.
Perhaps others have also
of a Nuclear Isomer in 65Fe...
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v100/i13/e132501)
Extremely low contamination would suffice.
I'm not sure, but I believe that detection would be difficult.
Unlikely, but I would welcome opinions.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
,
Lou Pagnucco
Hello Jed,
I just spoke to a friend, and we agreed that it is time to buy the
ultra-short oil ETF (code DUG) - I am waiting for oil keep ascending in
price for the next couple of days, then I am going to add some DUG to my
portfolio.
It is getting very difficult to believe so many smart people
Yes. I think you are correct.
The slides' text is terse. It does appear that the more current
experiments fall short of Patterson's results. But, unless the reaction
products have been measured incorrectly, some anomalous nuclear reactions
are occurring.
On 11-10-18 04:13 PM,
501 - 560 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
