should be enough for him to make significant progress.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
Systems / Solaris / Core
http://www.jmcpdotcom.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 17/02/13 08:48 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 02/16/2013 10:47 PM, James C. McPherson wrote:
...
Whether that message winds up being something you need
to talk with a Oracle about is entirely different.
He got a kernel panic on a completely legitimate operation (booting with
one half
that
MPxIO isn't working.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
Systems / Solaris / Core
http://www.jmcpdotcom.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
devid's in
preference to physical paths.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
Systems / Solaris / Core
http://www.jmcpdotcom.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 19/10/12 09:27 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of James C. McPherson
As far as I'm aware, having an rpool on multipathed devices is fine.
Even a year ago
On 12/06/12 06:40 AM, David Combs wrote:
Actual newsgroup for zfs-discuss?
Actually, no. Where's the value in having a newsgroup
as well as a mailing list?
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
location information in format, and
using the diskinfo too.
Otherwise, if you're running S11, you could try using
/usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmti - a tool which blinks LEDs at you
and prompts for label confirmation.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
in order for those changes to be correctly propagated.
You can (and should) read about this in the stmsboot(1m) manpage,
and there's more information available in my blog post
http://blogs.oracle.com/jmcp/entry/on_stmsboot_1m
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
On 1/02/12 12:40 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
...
I still don't really get what stmsboot -u actually does (and if - and if
so how much - this differs between x86 and sparc).
Would it be impolite to ask you to elaborate on this a little?
Not at all. Here goes.
/usr/sbin/stmsboot -u arms the
and/or prtconf -v.
hth,
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
that was supplied
to the manufacturer by a third party.
Personally, I'd start looking at the cables first - in my
experience they seem to incur more physical stress through the
connect/disconnect operations than HBAs.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
which tracks the inclusion in a Solaris 10 Update.
I'd also like to know where you're getting your information from
on this topic.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 14/03/11 11:26 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 9:20 AM
Just for clarity:
The in-kernel CIFS service is indeed available in solaris 10.
Are you really, really sure about that? Please point the RFE number
which
On 1/03/11 03:00 AM, Dave Pooser wrote:
On 2/27/11 11:13 PM, James C. McPhersonj...@opensolaris.org wrote:
/pci@0,0/pci8086,340c@5/pci1000,3020@0
and
/pci@0,0/pci8086,340e@7/pci1000,3020@0
which are in different slots on your motherboard and connected to
different PCI Express Root Ports -
employer.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to see bay numbers with the
fmtopo command - when you run it as root:
# /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmtopo -V
If this doesn't work for you, then you'll have to resort to the
tried and tested use of dd to /dev/null for each disk, and see
which lights blink.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http
and has different firmware to what you have
in your 9211 card. The 9211 card is also 2nd generation SAS, not 1st
generation like the 3081.
Personally, having worked on the mpt_sas(7d) project, I'm disappointed
that you believe the card and its driver are a failed bit.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
are fairly closely tied
to the PC architecture, that perhaps they do some bios calls to
try to figure out correct order mappings.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
, then you'll have pretty much
the same mpt_sas(7d) driver that S11x has.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 28/02/11 12:46 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:
On 2/27/11 4:07 PM, James C. McPhersonj...@opensolaris.org wrote:
...
PHY iport@
01
12
24
38
410
520
640
780
OK, bear with me for a moment because I'm feeling extra dense this evening.
The PHY tells me which port on
On 28/02/11 02:51 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:
On 2/27/11 10:06 PM, James C. McPhersonj...@opensolaris.org wrote:
...
2nd controller
c16t5000CCA222DDD7BAd0
/pci@0,0/pci8086,340c@5/pci1000,3020@0/iport@2/disk@w5000cca222ddd7ba,0
3rd controller
c14t5000CCA222DF8FBEd0
C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On 18/11/10 03:05 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Yeah, no driver issue.
BTW, any new storage-controller-related drivers introduced in snv151a?
LSI seems the only one who works very closely with Oracle/Sun.
You would have to have a look at what's in the repo,
I'm not allowed to tell you :|
James C
runs under OSOL build134 or solaris10?
I can.
This card should attach using the mpt_sas(7d) driver.
This is *different* to the mpt(7d) driver.
PSARC 2008/443 Driver for LSI MPT2.0 compliant SAS controller
went into build 118.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
On 8/10/10 03:28 PM, Anand Bhakthavatsala wrote:
...
--
*From:* James C. McPherson j...@opensolaris.org
*To:* Ramesh Babu rama.b...@gmail.com
On 7/10/10 03:46 PM, Ramesh Babu wrote:
I am trying to create ZPool using
the kernel.
Do you have the panic stack trace we can look at, and/or a
crash dump?
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
which was fixed in snv_135.
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
0 0 0
c5t50024E90037AF38Cd0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
for them within the pool should
stick around over an export/import operation. If they
don't, I would be very, very surprised.
[note: everybody was a noob at some point]
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss
,
why crypto bits are you using, and what changeset is your own workspace
synced with?
James C. McPherson
--
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
On 3/07/10 12:25 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
Given that the most basic of functionality was broken in Nexenta, and not
Opensolaris, and I couldn't get a single response, I have a hard time
recommending ANYONE go to Nexenta. It's great they're
On 21/06/10 10:38 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: James C. McPherson [mailto:j...@opensolaris.org]
On the build systems that I maintain inside the firewall,
we mandate one filesystem per user, which is a very great
boon for system administration.
What's the reasoning behind
On 22/06/10 01:05 AM, Fredrich Maney wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:59 AM, James C. McPherson
j...@opensolaris.org wrote:
[...]
So when I'm
trying to figure out who I need to yell at because they're
using more than our acceptable limit (30Gb), I have to run
du -s /builds/[zyx
RESPONDING to this thread?
It's not about ZFS at all.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
don't have to traverse
whole directory trees (ala ufs).
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
device.
It really shouldn't be a problem for you.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
/dsk/c5t50014EE1007EE473d0s0(sd39)
unavailable disk-pathn
/devices/p...@ff,0/pci10de,3...@f/pci1000,3...@0:scsi::6,0
No need to use luxadm.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs
/dsk/c5t50014EE1007EE473d0s0(sd39)
unavailable disk-pathn
/devices/p...@ff,0/pci10de,3...@f/pci1000,3...@0:scsi::6,0
No need to use luxadm.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs
On 2/06/10 11:39 AM, Fred Liu wrote:
Thanks.
No.
If you must disable MPxIO, then you do so after installation,
using the stmsboot command.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs
plain old targets, or
that no disk devices of any sort show up in your host when
you are installing?
What is your actual problem, and why do you think that
turning off MPxIO will solve it?
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
...@tata_st3320620as_4qf01rze'
And while I'm at it, let me recommend my presentation on
devids and guids
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/~jmcp/WhatIsAGuid.pdf
hth,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
believe you are talking through your hat.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
on a driver that
I worked on (mpt_sas), and I'm still trying to find out from
you and others what you think is a problem with it.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
in progress in
regards to being 'production ready'.
What metric are you using for production ready ?
Are there features missing which you expect to see
in the driver, or is it just oh noes, I haven't
seen enough big customers with it ?
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http
it.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
it.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.
Note that not all of those will be applicable for ZFS.
You should read the ZFS Best Practices Guide
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
and the ZFS Config Guide too
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Configuration_Guide
James C. McPherson
:-)
I don't know of any other specific difference between Enterprise
SATA and SAS drives.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Oracle
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
)
driver name:mr_sas
This should be using the mpt_sas driver, not the mr_sas driver.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
user0m0.458s
sys 0m5.260s
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
sata
Memory 16 GB
Processor Processor 1GH 6 core
Solaris 10 8/07 s10s_u4wos_12b SPARC
Since you are seeing this on a Solaris 10 update
release, you should log a call with your support
provider to get this investigated.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
build
snv_118.
So you could either wait until 2010.$spring comes out,
or start using the /dev repo instead.
hth,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs
On 8/03/10 01:42 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:12 AM, James C. McPherson j...@opensolaris.org
mailto:j...@opensolaris.org wrote:
On 7/03/10 12:28 PM, norm.tallant wrote:
I'm about to try it! My LSI SAS 9211-8i should arrive Monday or
Tuesday. I bought
to be used or
as extra swap ?
Yes. This is what I do at home, and what we do on the onnv
gate machines - we've got swap in rpool and a separate,
dedicated, swap pool.
Would this have any performance implications ?
Negative performance implications? none that I know of.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior
for the
official word to be announced - as will we all.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
=0xc
Feb 17 04:47:57 thecratewall scsi: [ID 365881 kern.info]
/p...@0,0/pci15ad,7...@15/pci1000,3...@0 (mpt_sas0):
Feb 17 04:47:57 thecratewall Log info 0x31110630 received for target 33.
Feb 17 04:47:57 thecratewall scsi_status=0x0, ioc_status=0x804b,
scsi_state=0xc
--
James C. McPherson
--
Senior
was fixed in snv_122.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
is different. The
qualification is done with the assumption that the disks will be
spinning every single second for a number of years, and that
they will have a much, *much* higher duty cycle than consumer
grade hardware.
Please stop assuming that all this only costs a few pennies.
It doesn't.
James C
/Community+Group+on/2009052003
and the update to the pluggable fwflash spec is
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/163/
original pluggable fwflash case
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2008/151
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http
of the whole
picture that is the SS7000 appliance series, as well as the
J4x00 series.
Personally, I'm quite happy with the LSISAS3081E that I have
installed in my system, with the attached 320Gb consumer-grade
SATA2 disks.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun
-USAS2-L8i
2. LSI SAS 9211-8i
No, the 2nd generation non-RAID LSI SAS controllers make
use of the mpt_sas(7d).
Second generation RAID LSI SAS controllers use mr_sas(7d).
Code for both of these drivers is Open and you can find
it on src.opensolaris.org.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software
to the task.
If you do come across problems, please bring it up in storage-discuss
or zfs-discuss, and if necessary file a bug on bugs.opensolaris.org
solaris/driver/mpt-sas, and solaris/driver/mr_sas are the two subcats
that you'll need in that case.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel
?
Anything else I should know before buying one of these cards ?
These cards work very well with OpenSolaris, and attach using
the mpt(7d) driver - supports hotplugging and MPxIO too.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http
/WhatIsAGuid.pdf
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
proving so is, however, another thing
entirely.
Could you send the output from prtconf -v for your host please,
so that we can have a look at the vital information for the
enclosure services and SMP nodes that the SAS Expander presents/
thankyou,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software
Tru Huynh wrote:
follow up, another crash today.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:35:07AM +0100, Tru Huynh wrote:
1) OS
SunOS xargos.bis.pasteur.fr 5.10 Generic_141445-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
You should be logging a support call for this issue.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer
Dennis Clarke wrote:
FYI,
OpenSolaris b128a is available for download or image-update from the
dev repository. Enjoy.
I thought that dedupe has been out for weeks now ?
The source has, yes. But what Richard was referring to was the
respun build now available via IPS.
cheers,
James C
Tru Huynh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 07:08:20PM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
If you and everybody else who is seeing this problem could provide
details about your configuration (output from cfgadm -lva, raidctl
-l, prtconf -v, what your zpool configs are, and the firmware rev
of each
here, we're just trying to nail down specifics of what
seems to be a likely cause.
thankyou in advance,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
LSI SAS3081E-R PCI-E 8 port SAS controllers, with
8 drives each.
Are these disks internal to your server's chassis, or external in
a jbod? If in a jbod, which one? Also, which cables are you using?
thankyou,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http
Chad Cantwell wrote:
Hi,
Replied to your previous general query already, but in summary, they are in the
server chassis. It's a Chenbro 16 hotswap bay case. It has 4 mini backplanes
that each connect via an SFF-8087 cable (1m) to my LSI cards (2 cables / 8
drives
per card).
Hi Chad,
thanks
the config space
(that's the pci bus config space), then you've got about
1/2 the nails in the coffin hammered in. Then the failure
to restart the IOC (io controller unit) == the rest of
the lid hammered down.
best regards,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun
to.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
of the CR, and removed
the reference to xVM from the synopsis - hopefully the mail gateway
will send your copy reasonably soon :-)
Best regards,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
on for the moment, thankyou.
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
command should have automatically run bootadm update-archive
for you, I have this habit of running it by hand whenever I change a
driver or /etc/system to make sure that I have an up to date boot archive
from that point in time onwards.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer
Thankyou for all who've procvided data about this. I've updated
the bugs mentioned earlier and I believe we can now make progress
on diagnosis.
The new synopsis (should show up on b.o.o tomorrow) is as follows:
6894775 mpt's msi support is suboptimal with xVM
James C. McPherson
--
Senior
(2SS00_01) of which we take
the last 4 bytes as the actual revision field, and the vendor and
product ids. The devid information helps here too.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
us sort through and find
any commonalities and hopefully a fix.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
?
Hi Travis,
your bug showed up - it's 6900767. Since bugs.opensolaris.org
isn't a live system, you won't be able to see it at
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6900767
until tomorrow.
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
that there might be a problem outside of the ones
that we identify.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
Travis Tabbal wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:25 PM, James C. McPherson
j...@opensolaris.org mailto:j...@opensolaris.org wrote:
The first step towards acknowledging that there is a problem
is you logging a bug in bugs.opensolaris.org
http://bugs.opensolaris.org. If you don't
Roman Naumenko wrote:
Interesting stuff.
By the way, is there a place to watch lated news like this on zfs/opensolaris?
rss maybe?
You could subscribe to onnv-not...@opensolaris.org...
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com
/view/Community+Group+on/flag-days
The flag days page has not been updated since the switch
to XWiki, it's on my todo list but I don't have an ETA
for when it'll be done.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http
Roman Naumenko wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote, On 09-11-09 04:40 PM:
Roman Naumenko wrote:
Interesting stuff.
By the way, is there a place to watch lated news like this on
zfs/opensolaris?
rss maybe?
You could subscribe to onnv-not...@opensolaris.org...
James C. McPherson
-discuss/2009-November/033672.html
On Mon Nov 9 14:26:54 PST 2009, James C. McPherson wrote:
The flag days page has not been updated since the switch
to XWiki, it's on my todo list but I don't have an ETA
for when it'll be done.
Perhaps anyone interested in seeing the flags days page
resurrected
or
pkg.opensolaris.org by early December.
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 :
neptune console login: root
Password:
Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console
Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009
SunOS Internal
, but missed seeing it, not sure why.
I've now moved the bug to the appropriate category so it will
get attention from the right people.
Thanks,
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
Adam Cheal wrote:
Cindy: How can I view the bug report you referenced? Standard methods
show my the bug number is valid (6694909) but no content or notes. We are
having similar messages appear with snv_118 with a busy LSI controller,
especially during scrubbing, and I'd be interested to see what
Adam Cheal wrote:
James: We are running Phase 16 on our LSISAS3801E's, and have also tried
the recently released Phase 17 but it didn't help. All firmware NVRAM
settings are default. Basically, when we put the disks behind this
controller under load (e.g. scrubbing, recursive ls on large ZFS
I'd ask before forking out
for a SATA DVD drive - just hate to put perfectly good drives
out for recycling.
It might work. It certainly wouldn't hurt to try.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http
Trevor Pretty wrote:
It think James said there was audio problems and that's why it took so
long to get published.
Well, one of the reasons. The other, more major, reason is that there's
been a heckuvalot of video generated lately that we want to get up on
slx.sun.com etc, and we don't have
they are ready I will
announce their availability as soon as I possibly can.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
were definitely not the recommended actions!
Given the rest of this thread, I'm really keen to see (as somebody
who works on mpt(7d)) how your system behaves with fixed SSD
firmware, using mpt(7d) and with disk fma turned on again.
After that, let's talk about broken drivers.
James C
. The video from the session is now being edited, however, with
more than one hour of footage to process, and only one person to do it
this is taking a while to get finished.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Andre Lue no-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
No.
If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which form will we
see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
No, and no.
Sorry,
James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer,
Loop disk device driver
SYNOPSIS
s...@port,target:partition
You won't see an ssd instance on x86, only on sparc.
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
Kernel Conference Australia
An introduction to btrfs, from somebody who used to work on ZFS:
http://www.osnews.com/story/21920/A_Short_History_of_btrfs
James C. McPherson
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
Kernel Conference
in both
Bill and Jeff's keynote as well as their roundtable discussion.
We had some problems with audio and video quality during the
conference, I think that's had an impact on what we've been
able to put up for viewing. I will find out more and post when
I have some facts on it.
James C
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo
