dkim-milter-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Debugging (was Re: Canonicalization patches) Mark Martinec
• [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter/dkim-filter 1.2 available for Ubuntu Feisty Users in feisty-backports Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter/dkim-filter 1.2 available for Ubuntu Feisty Users in feisty-backports Scott Kitterman
• [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM interop event Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] using multiple domains with different selector and keys name Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] using multiple domains with different selector and keys name Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] using multiple domains with different selector and keys name Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] using multiple domains with different selector and keys name Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Canonicalization patches Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Canonicalization patches Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Canonicalization patches Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Canonicalization patches Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Canonicalization patches Mark Martinec
• Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1? Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1? Mark Martinec
• [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whiles testing.dkim.org doesn't Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] My dkim-filter 2.1.1 failing others' whilst testing.dkim.org doesn't Tony Earnshaw
• [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] body_length troubles in dkim-milter-2.1.1 ? Mark Martinec
• [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-milter 2.1.1 SM
• [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Adam Gibson
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Adam Gibson
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Ben Lentz
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Adam Gibson
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Kaspar Brand
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available wit h CentOS5/RHEL5? Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Todd Lyons
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] rsa-sha256 not available with CentOS5/RHEL5? Adam Gibson
• [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Robert Schetterer
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Robert Schetterer
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN Robert Schetterer
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] can't read SMFIC_UNKNOWN SM
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Andy Fiddaman
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Janet N
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Unrecognized version 1 (This signature appears to be from an older draft ) Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Ben Lentz
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Ben Lentz
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Ben Lentz
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_QUERY_CACHE Scott Kitterman
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Bugs in v2.1.0 (alas) Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_STATS question Jukka Salmi
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Reminder about beta releases Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Reminder about beta releases Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Reminder about beta releases Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Reminder about beta releases Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM and Cisco PIX Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM and Cisco PIX Robert Schetterer
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM and Cisco PIX Tony Earnshaw
• [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-stats help needed Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-stats help needed Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] dkim-stats help needed Tony Earnshaw
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Dynamic header allocation Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Dynamic header allocation Tony Earnshaw
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Slow signing explained Mark Martinec
• [dkim-milter-discuss] some questions about dkim-milter Jukka Salmi
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] some questions about dkim-milter SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] some questions about dkim-milter Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [dkim-milter-discuss] cisco firewall dkim headers bug / whitelist feature request Robert Schetterer
  • [dkim-milter-discuss] cisco firewall dkim headers bug / whitelist feature request Robert Schetterer
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] cisco firewall dkim headers bug / whitelist feature request Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] some questions about dkim-milter Jukka Salmi
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Stats for 2.0Beta Graham Murray
  • [dkim-milter-discuss] Discussion of beta release issues Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libdkim packaging SM
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Gentoo Scripts Todd Lyons
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes Koski, David
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes Koski, David
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes Koski, David
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes Koski, David
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Solaris woes Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Beta testers? Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Mark Martinec
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] libmilter question re: socket permissions Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] ML Mangling Todd Lyons
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] ML Mangling Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] ML Mangling SM
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Split signing/verifying processes Todd Lyons
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Split signing/verifying processes Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Split signing/verifying processes SM
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Split signing/verifying processes Mark Martinec
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Negative results testing.... Ed Greshko
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Negative results testing.... Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Negative results testing.... Ed Greshko
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Negative results testing.... Ed Greshko
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Signing OK, but no verification SM
• [dkim-milter-discuss] _FFR_VBR is broken Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Thunderbird and simple header canonicalization Steven M Jones
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Thunderbird and simple header canonicalization Murray S. Kucherawy
  • [dkim-milter-discuss] Thunderbird and simple header canonicalization Steven M Jones
• [dkim-milter-discuss] Version option removed? Mike Markley
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] Version option removed? Mike Markley
• Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM-Filter active, but not signing Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dkim-milter-discuss] DKIM-Filter active, but not signing Murray S. Kucherawy

• Later messages