I follow the list regularly but haven't posted any messages so far
(that I can recall, at least), in the few years subscribed.
I participate a little more actively in a few other lists, as well;
but honestly I haven't seen a list as polluted as this one. The
remarkable thing is that almost all th
Excuse me, this thread was about..?
I follow the list regularly but haven't posted any messages so far
(that I can recall, at least), in the few years subscribed.
I participate a little more actively in a few other lists, as well;
but honestly I haven't seen a list as polluted as this one. The
rem
finally clear rules! Exactly what i said in the beginning - add two zeroes
to 50-100$ to get good advert.
Hey, Puchar, good flame at all, but after reading all of these emails I
decided and make a donation. Do you ? :) Is someone else ready for this ?
Today i sent some hardware to 2 people
On 01.06.2009, at 18:48, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
every donation is highly welcome. Please have a look at
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml
As you can see, every donor is mentioned, no matter how
small the amount. They'll display a link for donations
of $5,000 or more, and a
donor"==real spammer.
I don't see why I should accept that order. You have no supporters of
your rude and outlandish behavior, and you get worse with each
all your opinions
criticism. You do not represent FreeBSD, the FreeBSD foundation, or the
freebsd-questions mailing list. You can have wh
Written by Wojciech Puchar on 06/02/09 18:01>>
>>> Some people may want both, but well you can't have everything. It's not
>>> possible to everyone will agree with everyone on mailing list, and with
>>> every potential new user.
>>
>> I know that disagreeing is inevitable. My position is that a pl
Written by Wojciech Puchar on 06/03/09 15:15>>
>>
>> I'm literally rolling on the floor laughing at your hypocritical
>> observation here. The whole reason this tangled mess of threads even
>> exists is because you were aggressive in your own response to the
>> potential donor.
>>
>> That's all I h
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:48:29PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar typed:
> >every donation is highly welcome. Please have a look at
> > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml
> >
> >As you can see, every donor is mentioned, no matter how
> >small the amount. They'll display a link for donat
matter at all. Rather if you can get answer to questions about FreeBSD.
You can, even easier if some moderation would be present here.
Considering that the mailing list is one of the few places where
support exists, I don't know that I can agree with you.
Also, I don't think that an artificial
this way - nobody should write anyone. there is always a line that missed
- completely changes a sense of sentence.
I'm sure you know that this is an absurd proposition.
It's just explanation. You can't write anything that will be absolutely
resistible to misreading.
If second - then plea
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:34:55AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Any person might look at people in the community and decide that they
> > don't want to be a part of that community after all. That's why it
>
> Just reread this and, ... don't you think it's quite like a good filter?
>
> I don
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:03:06AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Even at first post i wrote that i'm not FreeBSD owners and they will
> >> decide.
> >
> > We're all human. The potential sponsors might have missed the line
> > where you said that you were not an owner.
>
> this way -
Any person might look at people in the community and decide that they
don't want to be a part of that community after all. That's why it
Just reread this and, ... don't you think it's quite like a good filter?
I don't talk about sponsors, but a new potential users.
If someone needs good unix,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 11:20:23PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >> just added option to pay by instalments
> >
> > The original poster several days ago suggested installments. His
> > original post suggested $50-$100/month. That is $600-$1200/year.
> > You repeatedly said that he would need to
2009/6/2 Wojciech Puchar :
...
>>
>>> Do you really mean i have enough power to just dumb any sponsors
>>> (potential, not "potential") by writing a post on public mailing
>>> list?
>>
>> Any person might look at people in the community and decide that they
>> don't want to be a part of that commun
...
Even at first post i wrote that i'm not FreeBSD owners and they will
decide.
We're all human. The potential sponsors might have missed the line
where you said that you were not an owner.
this way - nobody should write anyone. there is always a line that missed
- completely changes a sens
just added option to pay by instalments
The original poster several days ago suggested installments. His original post
suggested $50-$100/month. That is $600-$1200/year. You repeatedly said that he
would need to "add two zeros". Adding "two zeros" would be $60,000 -
$120,000/year.
Yes - i
On Tuesday, June 02, 2009, at 12:44PM, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>> You believe he will pay for 4 years?
>>>
>>
>> No... he is suggesting quadrupling the amount.
>
>so we end in what i suggested in the beginning - 5-10 thousands.
>just added option to pay by instalments
The original poster sever
You believe he will pay for 4 years?
No... he is suggesting quadrupling the amount.
so we end in what i suggested in the beginning - 5-10 thousands.
just added option to pay by instalments
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
2009/6/2 Wojciech Puchar :
>> I can't resist. The lack of math is killing me:
>>
>> ONE zero. ONE (1) ONE zero.
>>
>> 12 months/year * 50/month = $600/year
>> 12 months/year * 100/month = $1200/year
>>
>> $600/year / $5000/year = 0.12
>> $1200/year / $5000/year = 0.24 (or about a quarter of what
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:44:01 -0500
"Gary Gatten" wrote:
>My Mom always told me if you ignore things long enough they'll go away,
>so I've been trying to do that with several of these infinite mutating
>threads. That quote though is some funny $hit! I'm gonna print it out
>on a plotter and hang i
This thread is starting to remind me of a quote:
"You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in
common. They don't alter their views to fit the facts. They
alter the facts to fit the views, which can be uncomfortable if
you happen to be one of the facts that need
---
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Monceaux
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:35 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Math/Quote (Was: Flamewar ( was: Sponsoring FreeBSD))
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:48:40PM +0200, Wojcie
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:48:40PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> $417/month = $5004/year.
>
> You believe he will pay for 4 years?
This thread is starting to remind me of a quote:
"You know, the very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in
common. They don't alter their views
I can't resist. The lack of math is killing me:
ONE zero. ONE (1) ONE zero.
12 months/year * 50/month = $600/year
12 months/year * 100/month = $1200/year
$600/year / $5000/year = 0.12
$1200/year / $5000/year = 0.24 (or about a quarter of what is needed
for a link).
$417/month = $5004/year.
On Tuesday, June 02, 2009, at 07:23AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>>
>> http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml
>>
>> So, instead of being pissed on, they might have been persuaded to pay a
>> little
>> more, get their link and help the project as a whole.
>
>That's what i told -
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml
So, instead of being pissed on, they might have been persuaded to pay a little
more, get their link and help the project as a whole.
That's what i told - add two zeroes to be advertised.
Missed opportunity.
sure not.
__
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:08:30AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar typed:
>
> >I still cannot understand why you - an active, experienced and
> >knowledgeable FBSD user - would want to scare off potential donors for the
>
> once again please reread that post. it wasn't even potential donor, but
> potenti
every donation is highly welcome. Please have a look at
http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml
As you can see, every donor is mentioned, no matter how
small the amount. They'll display a link for donations
of $5,000 or more, and a logo for donations of $10,000
or more.
finally c
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:36:18PM +0200, Kian T. Gould - AOE media GmbH wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD Team,
>
> We are a small Open Source company in Germany, and due to our close
> connection to the Open Source world we sponsor several successful
> Open Source projects that help us in our daily work and
FreeBSD owners should start moderation and define rules. What they do
is their decision.
Mostly, the people who have broad and deep enough knowledge of the
system are busy and don't have time to waste moderating a list.
it's not that much work. The traffic won't be high
___
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:00:09PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>How about it? Only STRICT RULES keep things healthy and long lived.
> >
> >I wonder what makes you think you have the right to decide for all?
>
> Why you think so? I don't mean myself as definer of tha
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
How about it? Only STRICT RULES keep things healthy and long lived.
I wonder what makes you think you have the right to decide for all?
Why you think so? I don't mean myself as definer of that rules.
FreeBSD owners should start moderation and define rules. What they do
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> How about it? Only STRICT RULES keep things healthy and long lived.
I wonder what makes you think you have the right to decide for all?
I'm pretty happy as it is, except for this thread.
-- Frederique
___
freebsd-questions@fre
and browse http://localhost:8000
it certainly work ;)
I use the proxy to protect my entire browsing session when on a public
network -- not just for accessing freebsd.org.
vtun could be useful for you, and it's much more straightforward method
for tunneling ANY IP traffic.
__
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:16:13PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > set SOCKS Host: 127.0.0.1
> > set Port: 8080
> > select "SOCKS v5"
> >
> >Using the proxy, trying to reach freebsd.org just gives me a blank page
> >and (Untitled) in the Firefox tab.
> >
> well - same here. If you like to
set SOCKS Host: 127.0.0.1
set Port: 8080
select "SOCKS v5"
Using the proxy, trying to reach freebsd.org just gives me a blank page
and (Untitled) in the Firefox tab.
well - same here. If you like to see just FreeBSD page then
ssh -C -L 8000:69.147.83.33:80 yourhost
and browse http:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:47:04PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> >>Actually it's known to render poorly in a lot of browser configurations:
> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=www/91539
> >
> >My only problem has been that the FreeBSD site won't load if I'm using an
> >SSH proxy (
1: Many (note all) of your posts in response to questions carry what
we might call a snippy, kind of put down attitude toward the
questioner. Even when you are quite correct in information and
criticism, it is not received well if you also say something that
appears to ridicule
Why did you (attempt to) answer the question in the first place then?
Maybe he's trolling. Look how successful he was at instigating a flame
war. . . .
will not get any success without people like Chris Rees and few others.
Actually - starting it was not my plan at all.
__
OMFG Can someone PLEASE just shoot me now!!! How much do I have to
pay to make this thread and all the worthless babble therein go away forever?
no way, but please think about financing, or even better gathering few
people and convincing core team for setting up official MODERATED li
Actually it's known to render poorly in a lot of browser configurations:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=www/91539
My only problem has been that the FreeBSD site won't load if I'm using an
SSH proxy (even though both the local machine and the proxy machine are
FreeBSD systems, ironic
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >FreeBSD developers know enough to avoid speaking 'on behalf' of anyone,
> >unless they are explicitly asked to do so and it makes sense. We usually
> >just point the users gently towards an appropriate resource: a webpage, a
>
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:00:56PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > > > 3. Drafts for a possible redesign of your project's website
> > > >
> > > current webpage is excellent - no need to :) Most important - it works in
> > > every brows
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 2:15 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:57:57PM +0200, Peter Boosten wrote:
>> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> >>
>> > exactly d
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:57:57PM +0200, Peter Boosten wrote:
>> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> >>
>> > exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while stopping using it
>> > because of forum - still read and posts here.
>>
>> None of your concern:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:12:11PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:38:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Of course - ban it!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Just my 2c... Snotty comments like this in a p
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:57:57PM +0200, Peter Boosten wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> > exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while stopping using it
> > because of forum - still read and posts here.
>
> None of your concern: this is just what everybody is writing about.
> Whether som
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:44:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar :
> >>
> >> It is NOT an opinion that you were rude in your reply, and it is NOT
> >> an opinion that it's not your place to advise on how much constitutes
> >> an 'acceptable' or 'sufficient' donation.
> >>
> >
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:00:56PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> > > 3. Drafts for a possible redesign of your project's website
> > >
> > current webpage is excellent - no need to :) Most important - it works in
> > every browser.
>
> Actually it's known to ren
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:12:16AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> >FreeBSD developers know enough to avoid speaking 'on behalf' of anyone,
> >unless they are explicitly asked to do so and it makes sense. We usually
> >just point the users gently towards an appropriate resource: a webpage, a
Would all the children fighting in this thread please go suck your binkies and
leave the list alone. This has gone on for far too long, has worn out any
entertainment value it ever had and is clearly sucking up valuable bandwidth.
And yes, I'm well aware you'll feel compelled to respond, so al
it's UNMODERATED mailing list, so i can share my opinion.
And you are really the last person i care about when presenting my opinion.
So are you going to answer my question?
Why did you answer his question?
already did.
___
freebsd-questions@freeb
2009/5/28 Wojciech Puchar :
>>
>> Actually he said:
>>
>> > href=http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/12268152.html>
>> What we ask for in return for our sponsorships is a short mentioning
>> on the site somewhere with a link to our website.
>
> so if you believe it m
Actually he said:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/12268152.html>
What we ask for in return for our sponsorships is a short mentioning
on the site somewhere with a link to our website.
so if you believe it means that he will be happy with being on list, i can
2009/5/28 Wojciech Puchar :
>>> anyway, i reread the original "sponsoring" offer and i think i understand
>>> well. so - if FreeBSD team like to accept donations that way, my 100$ is
>>> still waiting :)
>>
>> I am afraid you still do not understand it. This sponsorship offer was NOT
>> directed to
On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:36:10 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> Dunno, I saw too many messages in the thread to remember if there
>> *was* anything wrong. I'm not saying that there was something wrong
>> with what
>
> so look back, as there wasn't.
>
> I think you just followed trend to cri
Dunno, I saw too many messages in the thread to remember if there *was*
anything wrong. I'm not saying that there was something wrong with what
so look back, as there wasn't.
I think you just followed trend to criticize my "just because", while you
didn't start it.
_
On Thu, 28 May 2009 11:12:16 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> FreeBSD developers know enough to avoid speaking 'on behalf' of
>> anyone, unless they are explicitly asked to do so and it makes sense.
>> We usually just point the users gently towards an appropriate
>> resource: a webpage, a
FreeBSD developers know enough to avoid speaking 'on behalf' of anyone,
unless they are explicitly asked to do so and it makes sense. We usually
just point the users gently towards an appropriate resource: a webpage, a
mailing list, or a team of more knowledgeable folks, etc.
Boris did the righ
could only do this, or stop being moderator.
If rules would allow any discussion if moderator should or should not delete
post, then rules are wrong and must be fixed.
moderator can not have any power to resolve personal things through it.
I read what you posted "carefully." I'm asking you to
anyway, i reread the original "sponsoring" offer and i think i understand
well. so - if FreeBSD team like to accept donations that way, my 100$ is
still waiting :)
I am afraid you still do not understand it. This sponsorship offer was NOT
directed to you.
did you really read my sentence.
I TOO
On Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:23 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
- post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD == what is created by FreeBSD
fundation and contributors.
>>>
>>> But you're the troublemaker that needs shutting up.
>>
>> i don't see the matureness of comments like this. possibly you
On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:29:24 -0500, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> What I can gather from this thread is that he, as a developer, might
> possibly have the right to speak on behalf of FreeBSD in regards to a
> sponsorship offer. On the other hand, you, who are neither a
> developer nor a core team membe
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> No! Unless you think that fBSd is the only functional/reliable OS. If
>
> for my needs it's actually true. Only FreeBSD meets my requirements.
ok . . .
>
>> Wojciech, I, like many others who have responded on this thread,
>> appreciate
No! Unless you think that fBSd is the only functional/reliable OS. If
for my needs it's actually true. Only FreeBSD meets my requirements.
Wojciech, I, like many others who have responded on this thread,
appreciate much of the help that you provide on this list. You seem to
fail (for whatever
therefore, it seems that keeping the list to fbsd issues is a valid
point.
Which WILL end up with moderated list within some time. Current quality
will not improve, only will get worse sooner or later.
The moderated list should be started quickly for simple reason:
at the beginning (almost)
I am afraid you still do not understand it. This sponsorship offer was NOT
directed to you. Neither was it to me. I did not reply to it because it
was clearly addressed to the core team.
it was addressed to mailing list. if he would like to address it to core
team, then he would do this!
to b
to miss those.
Everyone is right, Everyone is wrong, kiss and make up - and then PLEASE
STFU! And that's said with ALL due respect and not directed toward any
one person!
All this $hit DID make me realize I need to get my company to pony up
some $$$ - FreeBSD has been beneficial to u, so thanks
On Wed, 27 May 2009 17:15:58 -0500
Neal Hogan wrote:
> > of course it's very mature response :) it was repeated so many
> > times this or similar way at me that it matured!
>
> That's actually pretty funny! Nice!
>
yes that is very well done!
> As far as having the right to post your opinion
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, that certainly doesn't follow.
>>
>> Actually, that one does.
>
> Don't bother, he just answered that after reading "wojciech puchar" in mail
> header, so he had to be against.
No! Unless you think that fBSd is the only functio
Hi there,
First of all, if anyone is still reading it, I apologize if I sounded
harsh but I do care about FreeBSD so it does bother me that potential
supporters are turned down. Explanation below.
> anyway, i reread the original "sponsoring" offer and i think i understand
> well. so - if FreeBSD
As far as having the right to post your opinion . . sure . . . but
that does not mean that your opinions are just as good as others.
Being of the opinion that the earth is flat is just not a very good
opinion . . . no?
exactly. but as you may compare some of my opinions to "flat earth" as i
m
Well, that certainly doesn't follow.
Actually, that one does.
Don't bother, he just answered that after reading "wojciech puchar" in
mail header, so he had to be against.
If you use FreeBSD because of the OS functionality/reliability, etc
then trashy noise on the questions list wouldn't m
Sorry to wade in to this, but the reality has been and is just the
oposite. It is m. Puchar who has been making reactionary responses
and somewhat unkind ones at that.Is it a language issue? Or is
this. please tell me (privately) the fragment that you read as this,
because everything i t
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
- post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD == what is created by FreeBSD
fundation and contributors.
>>>
>>> But you're the troublemaker that needs shutting up.
>>>
>> i don't see the matureness of comments like this. possibly you meant it
reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech
Puchar
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:06 PM
To: utis...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD
>> Once again - please do moderated forum that posting rules will be
>>
>> - post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD =
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:38:46PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Of course - ban it!
> >>
> >>
> >> Just my 2c... Snotty comments like this in a public forum, is exactly why
> >> I
> >> no longer use FreeBSD. Just about everythin
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>"mainstream", or because i have opinion at all, i just respond normally.
> >
> >Wojtek - I also think you have the capacity to help and you often do. But
> >don't pretend to be speaking for the FreeBSD team because you are doing
Once again - please do moderated forum that posting rules will be
- post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD == what is created by FreeBSD fundation
and contributors. This means - base system+port system. And mean for example
that:
But you're the troublemaker that needs shutting up.
I'm very sorry f
- post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD == what is created by FreeBSD
fundation and contributors.
But you're the troublemaker that needs shutting up.
i don't see the matureness of comments like this. possibly you meant it
in a different way.
of course it's very mature response :) it was repeated
On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:20:15 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> > - post ONLY about FreeBSD. FreeBSD == what is created by FreeBSD
> > fundation and contributors.
>
> But you're the troublemaker that needs shutting up.
>
i don't see the matureness of comments like this. possibly you meant it
in a differe
2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar :
>> thread is a PERFECT example there of, but there are many, many, many
>> threads that got COMPLETELY derailed because someone said the smallest
>> little thing that annoyed someone else. GROW UP PEOPLE FFS.
>
> no matter what you think and what your opinion is, you wi
thread is a PERFECT example there of, but there are many, many, many
threads that got COMPLETELY derailed because someone said the smallest little
thing that annoyed someone else. GROW UP PEOPLE FFS.
no matter what you think and what your opinion is, you will always find
part of forum users to
On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:30:01 +0200
Chris Knipe wrote:
> If you want the world to believe you have a mature OS, *ACT* like you
> have a mature OS...
>
i think it is a good idea for people to act maturely on forums
otherwise we stop communicating and start screammunicating.
> Why am I still here
On Wed 27 May 2009 at 09:44:03 PDT Glen Barber wrote:
This is enough.
I agree.
It is characteristic of flamewars that the participants are no longer
talking about anything except each other. It's entirely off-topic.
I don't know which is more tiresome, Wojciech's edgy remarks or the
const
On 27/05/09 12:40 -0700, prad wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009 19:34:04 +0200
"Chris Knipe" wrote:
Snotty comments like this in a public forum, is exactly why I
no longer use FreeBSD.
i really don't understand this.
it would make sense for you to ignore the forum, but why take it out on
the os?
Wojciech Puchar writes:
1. Monthly sponsoring of around 50 to 100 USD
(restore a quote Wojciech deletted intentionally)
>>> add two zeroes to this values then maybe FreeBSD core team will be
>>> interested. of course i can't speak of them, but i think so.
>>
>> No, any financial co
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>> exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while stopping using it
>>> because of forum - still read and posts here.
>>>
>>
>> None of your concern: this is just what everybody is writing about.
>> Whether someone is using FreeBSD or not, and reading here or not, is
>
2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar :
>>> "mainstream", or because i have opinion at all, i just respond normally.
>>
>> Wojtek - I also think you have the capacity to help and you often do. But
>> don't pretend to be speaking for the FreeBSD team because you are doing
>
> reread my posts. i didn't speak for
On Wed, 27 May 2009 19:34:04 +0200
"Chris Knipe" wrote:
> Snotty comments like this in a public forum, is exactly why I
> no longer use FreeBSD.
>
i really don't understand this.
it would make sense for you to ignore the forum, but why take it out on
the os?
--
In friendship,
prad
2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar :
>>> exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while stopping using it
>>> because of forum - still read and posts here.
>>>
>>
>> None of your concern: this is just what everybody is writing about.
>> Whether someone is using FreeBSD or not, and reading here or not,
exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while stopping using it
because of forum - still read and posts here.
None of your concern: this is just what everybody is writing about.
Whether someone is using FreeBSD or not, and reading here or not, is
irrelevant to most (and probably to all) dis
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
no longer use FreeBSD. Just about everything in these mailing lists
turns
>>>
>>> If you stopped using FreeBSD BECAUSE OF FORUM, congratulations ;)
>>>
>>> This means that OS functionality is not important for you at all!
>>
>> Well, that certainly doesn't follow.
no longer use FreeBSD. Just about everything in these mailing lists turns
If you stopped using FreeBSD BECAUSE OF FORUM, congratulations ;)
This means that OS functionality is not important for you at all!
Well, that certainly doesn't follow.
exactly does. i just don't catch why he - while
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>>
>>> Of course - ban it!
>>
>>
>> Just my 2c... Snotty comments like this in a public forum, is exactly why
>> I
>> no longer use FreeBSD. Just about everything in these mailing lists turns
>
> If you stopped using FreeBSD BECAUSE OF FORU
Of course - ban it!
Just my 2c... Snotty comments like this in a public forum, is exactly why I
no longer use FreeBSD. Just about everything in these mailing lists turns
If you stopped using FreeBSD BECAUSE OF FORUM, congratulations ;)
This means that OS functionality is not important for
"mainstream", or because i have opinion at all, i just respond normally.
Wojtek - I also think you have the capacity to help and you often do. But
don't pretend to be speaking for the FreeBSD team because you are doing
reread my posts. i didn't speak for them and i said that i'm not them.
i AS
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: 27 May 2009 05:57 PM
To: Zbigniew Szalbot
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; utis...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Sponsoring FreeBSD
>>
>>> as usually - i speak for m
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>> Do you know who Boris is?
>
> checked a FreeBSD site - he is a listed as a developer.
>
> but how does it compare to what i said about logo of main webpage
> and "improving" website.
What I can gather from this thread is that he,
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
