[Elecraft] Re: Subrx availability?

2007-06-12 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hallo Eric,

Eric Swartz wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


The 2nd RX should ship 30-45 days after the first K3s begin shipping.
It was the last item to leave engineering and the pipeline of parts
and PCBs takes time to arrive here. Plus we have a lot of items to
build, test and ship.


Thank you for the information!

Would it be too much to ask what the shipping schedules for the K3 and 
the other options, filters, etc. look like currently?


vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread John GM4SLV
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:02:21 -0400
Stephen W. Kercel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 As for legality, for FCC licensed stations, signing /QRP is 
 perfectly legal. FCC Regs 97.119(c) allows for self-assigned 
 indicators. There is an interesting gotcha to the rule. The last 
 sentence of the regulation says No self-assigned may conflict with 
 any other indicator specified by the FCC rules, or with any prefix 
 assigned to another country. Q signals, including QRP, pose no such 
 conflict. However, as W3BE points out, other popular self-assigned 
 indicators are illegal, particularly /M, commonly used by mobile 
 stations, a prefix assigned to the UK, 

That's an odd one! The prefix M is indeed assigned to the UK and used
in the amateur service. But in the UK /M it is also the legally
assigned suffix to be used when operating from a vehicle or as a
pedestrian (leaving aside the recent regulation change in the UK which
seems to have made the use of the suffixes for mobile/portable etc.
optional).

As far as I can read in our regs there's nothing to prevent adding /QRP
to one's callsign. As long as your basic call is given correctly then
anything else is allowed in a QSO - tagging /QRP to the end seems to me
to be just part of the rest of the QSO. It's splitting hairs to worry
about the difference between GM4SLV/QRP and GM4SLVspaceQRP and
(when I'm sending!!) GM4SLVmight be a space, might not be who can
tell/QRP

As to actually signing /QRP I tend to agree that in general it's
pointless and even counterproductive, as it seems to put some people off
- a real 559 turns into 339 in the mind of the op at the other end when
the seed of oh - it's a QRP station doubt is sown too early in the
QSO!

I do find it useful as a QRP operator to know in advance that the weak
station I can hear is actually QRP because then (through the theory of
reciprosity) I can assume that he'll hear me just as well as I can
hear him. 

Without this clue (/QRP) I tend  assume other signals are from normal
100w stations and therefore I'll be receiving 13dB more signal from them
than they will from me. I'll switch in my attenuator and see how it
still sounds. If he's still workable I'll give him a call (not
signing /QRP).

I never sign /QRP but accasionally I'll add QRP into a CQ call if I'm
on one of the QRP calling frequencies and want to inform other QRPers
that I'll be able to hear them, if they can hear me.

Cheers

John GM4SLV
Shetland Isles
UK
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3 ordered - poles apart

2007-06-12 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
WOW - how many of us just ordered and were so dazed we didn't even spot that
?

On 12/6/07 09:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 Sorry for the discrepancy and thanks for bringing to Elecraft's attention.
 
 Neither case is correct.  The FM filter is actually a 7-pole filter.  This is
 correct on the pdf printable order form.  It will be corrected online and for
 the 
 receipts.
-- 
It came to me that reform should begin at home, and since that day I have
not had time to remake the world. -Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re K2 ordering!

2007-06-12 Thread F5UL

Hi Brian,
What you are trying to do for your GB Montessori School is exactly what I 
was going to do for a youg association here near Geneva. But I failes 
because I did not get any allocation for this project, as it was termed 
unnecessary!!!

Well
You did right with the K2, because when you finish  the kit, by the book, 
you know and understand the transceiver as much as their conceptors.
As you intend, take the SSB module, beside fone you will be able to run 
digital mode too. I waited two years before ordering the KPA100 and it is 
not yet in service!

About a year after the K2 and SSB, I instaled the KAT2 antenna tuner.
So you can do lot of things whith QRP level and I will not change anything 
but for another K!!!

Good work Brian, best regards
F5UL/Bob 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re:Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Dave Sergeant
On 12 Jun 2007 at 4:03, GM4SLV wrote:

 As far as I can read in our regs there's nothing to prevent adding
 /QRP to one's callsign. As long as your basic call is given
 correctly then anything else is allowed in a QSO - tagging /QRP to the
 end seems to me to be just part of the rest of the QSO. It's splitting
 hairs to worry about the difference between GM4SLV/QRP and
 GM4SLVspaceQRP and (when I'm sending!!) GM4SLVmight be a space,
 might not be who can tell/QRP

But I see the comment earlier that US FCC licences specifically have 
a clause allowing you to add your self assigned suffixes, which does 
indicate it is legal in the USA. I know of no other licence 
administration which has this and it is certainly not the case in the 
UK. The only suffixes our standard licence allows (and which is now 
optional) are /P, /A and /M - and if you have the appropriate licence 
/MM and /AM (but aeronautical mobile is to all intents and purposes 
never licenseable in the UK). Any other suffixes are by implication 
not allowed.

I now have 220 countries worked on QRP and have NEVER put a /QRP on 
my call. I only ever say G3YMC QRP (no /) towards the end of a QSO 
with another QRP station, and normally don't even mention that I am 
QRP until well into the QSO when I give details of the rig. It is 
absolutely never justified in contests/pileups and as far as I am 
concerned /QRP is never part of any callsign and never gets logged or 
acknowledged by me.

As for calling weak signals and hoping they will come back, I have 
just had three QSOs with FY/G3SXW and FY/G3TXF. In each case their 
signal was just above the noise and I would normally never even think 
it worth calling. But since I know Roger and Nigel I decided to have 
a go. In each case he came back after just one or two calls through 
the pileup (and the usual 599...). Never underrate your ability to 
work weak stations on QRP...

73 Dave G3YMC

http://www.davesergeant.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re:Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Marc G0AZS

just had three QSOs with FY/G3SXW and FY/G3TXF. In each case their
signal was just above the noise and I would normally never even think
it worth calling. But since I know Roger and Nigel I decided to have
a go. In each case he came back after just one or two calls through
the pileup (and the usual 599...). Never underrate your ability to
work weak stations on QRP...


...and of course Roger is using his K2 isn't he? So he will hear you! :-)

73 Marc G0AZS
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Headphone output from the K2

2007-06-12 Thread zl1aih
Hi Steve, You wrote: 
I have been using a FlexRadio SDR-1000 rig mostly because of the great DSP. 
One of the advantages is the external Firewire sound card which is able to 
boost 
audio into the headphones. I even found a cheap set of KOSS UR29 headphones 
have more output than my Heil's. The headphone output on the PRO II causes the 
headphone audio to distort before its loud enough for me.

My 0.02c worth:
At ZM1A we use several transceivers - IC-746PRO, IC-780, Kenwood TS-850 and 
two Elecraft K2s in serious Multi-Single/Multi-Two Cw contesting.   With three 
or 
four regular operators, (one of whom has moderate hearing loss) each with their 
own transceiver preferences, we 'discovered' that not all headphones are 
created 
equal.   We have two Heil, one Sony and two 'el cheapo' (NZ$29.95) headphones.

At both operating positions we have dual headphone sockets available.
When the Heils are used on the K2s they are either severely mismatched or lack 
sensitivity.   The other 'phones are very loud indeed on the K2s - the Heils 
are fine 
on the other rigs.   

During contests we have reserved the Heils for use by shack visitors.   Also, 
because they rest on the external ear, they admit too much external noise - the 
cheap 'phones enclose the ears, reducing the inter-operator banter (shouted 
insults 
and cheers etc.) to a quiet roar, barely audible above the ambient blower/fan 
noise.

However, the op with moderate hearing loss uses an Audio Enhancer (in QST a 
couple of years ago) with the Sony 'phones which works very well for him in 
that he 
doesn't hear the shouted insults, cheers or blower/fan noise at all.
I have tried his Audio Enhancer unit and can thoroughly recommend it - there 
is a 
PC board available in the US.

73, Ken ZL1AIH
K2s 767, 3725
Fists #9094 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Feed PTT thrue coax for DB6NT Transceiver

2007-06-12 Thread Martin RATH

Hi !

I'm planning on using my K2 as an IF for a remote 1296 MHz DB6NT 
Transverter. I would love to switch the PTT thrue to coax line. For that 
I would need 3 to 12V on the center pin of the coax. Can I just use the 
pin 6 (8T) of the J13 connector and inject this into the antenna socket 
of my KAT2 like it is done on a FT 290R2 or IC 202 like describde there :


http://www.btinternet.com/~jewell/FT290R2.html

http://perso.orange.fr/f1bzg/technique.htm

Thank you for your help !

Martin

F4UKP / DD4UKP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re:Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Jozef Hand-Boniakowski
Simply put: when I call CQ and I have multiple stations respond, I give 
preference to the station that is the weakest or who signs /QRP which is 
not always one and the same.


Jozef WB2MIC

Dave Sergeant wrote:

On 12 Jun 2007 at 4:03, GM4SLV wrote:

  

As far as I can read in our regs there's nothing to prevent adding
/QRP to one's callsign. As long as your basic call is given
correctly then anything else is allowed in a QSO - tagging /QRP to the
end seems to me to be just part of the rest of the QSO. It's splitting
hairs to worry about the difference between GM4SLV/QRP and
GM4SLVspaceQRP and (when I'm sending!!) GM4SLVmight be a space,
might not be who can tell/QRP



But I see the comment earlier that US FCC licences specifically have 
a clause allowing you to add your self assigned suffixes, which does 
indicate it is legal in the USA. I know of no other licence 
administration which has this and it is certainly not the case in the 
UK. The only suffixes our standard licence allows (and which is now 
optional) are /P, /A and /M - and if you have the appropriate licence 
/MM and /AM (but aeronautical mobile is to all intents and purposes 
never licenseable in the UK). Any other suffixes are by implication 
not allowed.


I now have 220 countries worked on QRP and have NEVER put a /QRP on 
my call. I only ever say G3YMC QRP (no /) towards the end of a QSO 
with another QRP station, and normally don't even mention that I am 
QRP until well into the QSO when I give details of the rig. It is 
absolutely never justified in contests/pileups and as far as I am 
concerned /QRP is never part of any callsign and never gets logged or 
acknowledged by me.


As for calling weak signals and hoping they will come back, I have 
just had three QSOs with FY/G3SXW and FY/G3TXF. In each case their 
signal was just above the noise and I would normally never even think 
it worth calling. But since I know Roger and Nigel I decided to have 
a go. In each case he came back after just one or two calls through 
the pileup (and the usual 599...). Never underrate your ability to 
work weak stations on QRP...


73 Dave G3YMC

http://www.davesergeant.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Headphone output levels on the K2?

2007-06-12 Thread Brett gazdzinski
 
I have an old set of full size sony headphones 
that give way more than enough audio output
for my moderate hearing loss.
Most headphones are rated for the level of audio out
for power in, and the ones that cover the ears seem to be
more comfortable for me and reduce any outside noise.


How you set up the agc effects the audio output level
of the k2, and there are resistors that can be changed
or eliminated in the headphone circuit, or you
could plug the headphones in the ext speaker output.

You can also change the tone of the CW to get in a range that
you might hear better, I seem to like a much higher CW
note than many operators as I am up against the BFO range
limit on my K2.

Brett
N2DTS




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Kallal
 Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:16 AM
 To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] Headphone output levels on the K2?
 
 Hello again!
 
 I have a requirement that my rigs have relatively high audio 
 output wo/
 distortion from the headphone jack. I have a moderate hearing 
 loss, about 45
 db down especially in the speech region. The audiologists calls that
 MODERATE. 60 db down is considered more serious. Wow! Even 
 the FCC wants tx
 spurs down 40 db or so.
 
 I have been using a FlexRadio SDR-1000 rig mostly because of 
 the great DSP.
 One of the advantages is the external Firewire sound card 
 which is able to
 boost audio into the headphones. I even found a cheap set of KOSS UR29
 headphones have more output than my Heil's. The headphone 
 output on the PRO
 II causes the headphone audio to distort before its loud 
 enough for me.
 
 But the simplicity of CW seems wasted on a lot of hardware 
 hanging off a PC.
 I am a new CW op. Started last fall getting my code speed up 
 after 31 years
 as a ham and 29 years on HF. Do about 15 wpm on a good day. A 
 friend of mine
 thinks the K2 is a good rig for copying weak CW popping 
 through the QRN. The
 SDR is the best I've found so far. It certainly puts my PRO 
 II to shame on
 rx.
 
 I think the best thing about a kit like the K2 is that adding 
 a small audio
 stage internally before the headphone jack doesn't ruin the 
 rig. But I would
 hope that won't be necessary.
 
 Also I don't wear my hearing aids with headphones because of 
 feeback. I went
 with behind the ear hearing aids. Maybe a heaphones with 
 larger deeper cups
 would help.
 
 I welcome comments from those who are familiar with the 
 headphone output
 level on the K2. I don't want to drag around some external 
 mixer to listen
 to CW, hi hi.
 
 73,
 
 Steve N6VL
 FISTS #12707
 SKCC #2383
  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Brett gazdzinski
Well, you need to get the antenna, coax, a key, microphone?

I would nix the KPA100, and the DSP, and even the SSB option as
you can receive ssb fine on the base K2.

It might be more fun to put up a G5RV and use the low power
auto tuner, you can go anyplace on any band that way.

If you really want to TRANSMIT the digital modes, I guess
you would need the KPA100, but without a tuner, the swr
needs to be almost zero, something most multi band
antenna's will not do over a useful frequency range
on the lower bands.
You can receive the digital modes fine with the base K2 I guess.

You could build the K2 this year and next year build options,
or are you going to build a K2 every year?

It seems to me like building a K1 or K2 would teach students 
a lot more useful info than most of the other stuff in school.

Brett
N2DTS

 


 
 So after all this discussion of the K3, here I am getting ready to  
 purchase a K2.
 
 As I think I have mentioned before, I am setting up a science and  
 technology center in our school, Granite Bay Montessori School.  
 (http://www.gbmontessori.com) We have received a grant from the ARRL  
 to help populate the center with equipment including an amateur  
 station. We have been asked for a list of what we would like and I  
 have decided to go against the flow and request a K2 kit. (They were  
 recommending we choose either a Yaesu FT-897, an Icom 
 IC-706mkIIg, or  
 a Kenwood TS-570SG.)
 
 My plan is to have the all the kids work on the kit so that 
 they have  
 the feeling of both participation and accomplishment. I also plan to  
 use the assembly and testing procedures to help cement what they are  
 learning about electricity.
 
 The radios mentioned above all fall into the sub $1000 range so that  
 is a calibration point for what I think we can get away with  
 spending. So my question here is, if you were going to outfit a K2  
 and try to keep the price reasonable what would you get and what  
 might you leave behind. As I see it, the absolute must-have items are:
 
 1. the K2 itself (duh);
 2. the SSB module.
 
 After that it becomes a bit fuzzy. For instance, I would like  
 opinions as to the need for the KPA-100. Note that if I don't 
 opt for  
 the KPA-100 I *will* get the KIO-2. Since I expect to be using this  
 rig mostly in in the classroom with a matched antenna (I am leaning  
 toward the GAP Titan DX as I have one and like it), I probably would  
 not opt for the KAT-2. What about the DSP module?
 
 The kids are learning the code and I hope/expect that there 
 will be a  
 fair amount of CW operation. (The kids actually think that learning  
 the code will be a cool thing in and of itself. I am using the Code  
 Quick system with them.) I also expect some SSB and digital (AFSK,  
 PSK31, MFSK, SSTV, etc.) operation.
 
 Anyway, I solicit the input from the folks on this list. You have a  
 lot of experience with the product and can help me make the right  
 decisions.
 
 Thanks!
 
 73 de Brian, WB6RQN
 Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread Kenneth A. Christiansen
I have K2 SN 1031 and an IC-746PRO. Last week my next door neighbor 
brought home a large screen TV that looks to be the rear projection 
type. I didn't pay much attention to it as they unloaded it but now find 
it puts out lots of QRN. It  puts out S9 on the PRO 60 HZ QRN on 20, 15, 
10 6 and 2 meters. Those are the bands I have antennas that work. The 
noise blanker in theK2 and the PRO both eliminate this bad QRN right 
down to the background noise :-)  when there are now strong signals on 
the band but when a strong station such as the W1AW code sessions come 
on 20 meters, (20 over 9 in ND), than the K2 using NB1 has problems 5 
KHZ or so either side of W1AW. NB2 has problems up to 10 KHZ either side 
of W1AW and the PRO has problems 15 KHZ either side of W1AW :-( . Is the 
noise blanker on the K3 ahead of the roofing filter or behind the 
roofing filter. If it is behind the roofing filter buying a K3 might put 
me back on the air :-)  but if it is ahead of the roofing filter 
than would I have the same problem as the K2 :-( ? I have looked at the 
FAQ part of the Elecraft K3 site and do not find the answer to this 
question. I just need a short answer so please do not start a long 
thread on my station or observations etc.


73 and thanks for the help.

W0CZ
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Mark Bayern

You'll need the SSB module for the digital modes. Keep it on the list.

The KAT-2 (auto tuner) also adds a real bridge and a second antenna
connector. If you have an antenna that is matched on all freqs you
plan on running, and only plan on having one antenna, the KAT-2 won't
do anything for you. However, if you'd ever like to be able to easily
switch between two antennas, or you'd like to experiment with other
antennas, the KAT-2 is a great thing to have.

I'd 'leave behind' the noise blanker and the DSP. The noise blanker
gets mixed reviews on this list, and the two I have have never blanked
any noise at my QTH. (Maybe I just have the wrong kind of noise?).

Mark  AD5SS

On 6/12/07, Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So after all this discussion of the K3, here I am getting ready to
purchase a K2.

As I think I have mentioned before, I am setting up a science and
technology center in our school, Granite Bay Montessori School.
(http://www.gbmontessori.com) We have received a grant from the ARRL
to help populate the center with equipment including an amateur
station. We have been asked for a list of what we would like and I
have decided to go against the flow and request a K2 kit. (They were
recommending we choose either a Yaesu FT-897, an Icom IC-706mkIIg, or
a Kenwood TS-570SG.)

My plan is to have the all the kids work on the kit so that they have
the feeling of both participation and accomplishment. I also plan to
use the assembly and testing procedures to help cement what they are
learning about electricity.

The radios mentioned above all fall into the sub $1000 range so that
is a calibration point for what I think we can get away with
spending. So my question here is, if you were going to outfit a K2
and try to keep the price reasonable what would you get and what
might you leave behind. As I see it, the absolute must-have items are:

1. the K2 itself (duh);
2. the SSB module.

After that it becomes a bit fuzzy. For instance, I would like
opinions as to the need for the KPA-100. Note that if I don't opt for
the KPA-100 I *will* get the KIO-2. Since I expect to be using this
rig mostly in in the classroom with a matched antenna (I am leaning
toward the GAP Titan DX as I have one and like it), I probably would
not opt for the KAT-2. What about the DSP module?

The kids are learning the code and I hope/expect that there will be a
fair amount of CW operation. (The kids actually think that learning
the code will be a cool thing in and of itself. I am using the Code
Quick system with them.) I also expect some SSB and digital (AFSK,
PSK31, MFSK, SSTV, etc.) operation.

Anyway, I solicit the input from the folks on this list. You have a
lot of experience with the product and can help me make the right
decisions.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread David Y.
As for legality, for FCC licensed stations, signing /QRP is perfectly 
legal. FCC Regs 97.119(c) allows for self-assigned indicators. There is an 
interesting gotcha to the rule. The last sentence of the regulation says No 
self-assigned may conflict with any other indicator specified by the FCC 
rules, or with any prefix assigned to another country. Q signals, including 
QRP, pose no such conflict. However, as W3BE points out, other popular 
self-assigned indicators are illegal, particularly /M, commonly used by 
mobile stations, a prefix assigned to the UK, and /R commonly used by 
repeaters, a prefix assigned to Russia, and used for special ham callsigns 
for Russian WW2 veterans.



73,

Steve Kercel
AA4AK
--

Interesting what you find when reading the rules!  However, I wonder if your 
illustration of signing /M for mobile really is a problem.  It's my 
understanding that when operating from a foreign country you would place 
that country's prefix in front of your call, not at the end as a suffix.  In 
other words, in the U.K. I would sign M/W7AQK (or G/W7AQK?) rather than 
W7AQK/M.  So, using the /M  as a mobile designator wouldn't really be in 
conflict with the rules would it?  It's being used as a suffix, and not as a 
prefix.  Maybe that's not a correct interpretation, but I've never heard of 
anyone being dinged by the FCC for signing /M when operating mobile.  Of 
course, I don't think FCC listens much any more to what goes on in the ham 
bands anyway!


Dave W7AQK






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Looking For a K2 Builder w/short Lead Time

2007-06-12 Thread David Y.
Dick, K6KR wrote:The Elecraft support guy, Gary, is excellent.  I had the 
same concerns, and a

couple
of times I had a sinking feeling that maybe I'd never get it right, but Gary
bailed me
out over the web with close-up pictures of problem areas, and I now have a 
fine

little
radio that I built from a kit.

-I just want to put a plug in for Gary Surrency.  I'm 
not trying to increase his workload, but I don't think a lot of people 
realize what a superb resource he is for Elecraft.  Usually if you need tech 
support from Elecraft, Gary is the one who gets the job of responding.  He 
knows all of these Elecraft radios inside and out, will undoubtedly focus 
very quickly of probable causes for your problem and recommended solutions. 
I think it's a shame more folks don't get a chance to meet Gary at hamfests, 
but perhaps that's by choice--he's a busy guy!  I know him because he lives 
here in Arizona, but even I don't get to see him that much anymore, and I 
guess that's because he's loaded down taking care of business.  But he's a 
fine fellow, and I encourage you to take advantage of this excellent 
resource.Dave W7AQK 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Feed PTT thrue coax for DB6NT Transceiver

2007-06-12 Thread Don Wilhelm

Martin,

I would strongly suggest using the 8R signal instead - when inverted it 
is the same as the signal from the KPA100 ext amp keying interface or 
the Amp Keying interface for the base K2 that is offered by Tom N0SS.


8R can be set to a delay in the K2 menu and is present about 15ms prior 
to the onset of RF, 8T cannot be manipulated by the menu parameters.


The amp keying interface grounds when active, but you could drive a 
small (fast) relay that will in turn provide your required voltage.


73,
Don W3FPR

Martin RATH wrote:

Hi !

I'm planning on using my K2 as an IF for a remote 1296 MHz DB6NT 
Transverter. I would love to switch the PTT thrue to coax line. For that 
I would need 3 to 12V on the center pin of the coax. Can I just use the 
pin 6 (8T) of the J13 connector and inject this into the antenna socket 
of my KAT2 like it is done on a FT 290R2 or IC 202 like describde there :


http://www.btinternet.com/~jewell/FT290R2.html

http://perso.orange.fr/f1bzg/technique.htm

Thank you for your help !

Martin

F4UKP / DD4UKP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re:Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Julian G4ILO

On 6/12/07, Jozef Hand-Boniakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Simply put: when I call CQ and I have multiple stations respond, I give
preference to the station that is the weakest or who signs /QRP which is
not always one and the same.


Which to my mind negates Dave's statement...


It is
 absolutely never justified in contests/pileups


If it helps get you the contact, then it is justified. On CW, there is
probably no benefit, but on phone, the DX may hear QRP when they
don't make out ILO or YMC.
--
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Feed PTT thru coax for DB6NT Transceiver

2007-06-12 Thread Tom Hammond

Hi Martin:

At 07:57 06/12/2007, Don Wilhelm wrote:
I would strongly suggest using the 8R signal instead - when inverted 
it is the same as the signal from the KPA100 ext amp keying 
interface or the Amp Keying interface for the base K2 that is 
offered by Tom N0SS.


See: http://www.n0ss.net/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf

73,

Tom   N0SS


8R can be set to a delay in the K2 menu and is present about 15ms 
prior to the onset of RF, 8T cannot be manipulated by the menu parameters.


The amp keying interface grounds when active, but you could drive a 
small (fast) relay that will in turn provide your required voltage.


73,
Don W3FPR


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread Dale Boresz

Hello Brett,

Sorry, this is a little off topic, but ...

Shunting loudspeaker terminals on an amplifier (or at the loudspeakers 
themselves) may cause instabilities with some amplifiers due to phase 
shift, causing them to break into oscillation well out of hearing range, 
resulting in possible failure of the output transistors (at the very 
least), and some embarrassment and expense to the applicator  :-)


It's usually more effective (and will not cause any instabilities to the 
amplifier) to place ferrite beads over the individual wires or over the 
pair of wires (whichever works best) as near to the loudspeaker 
terminals on the amplifier/receiver as possible.


Sometimes, due to the size of the connector terminals at the ends of the 
wires, it is not possible or practical to fit a ferrite bead over the 
wire. In those instances, you can obtain some split cores from Radio 
Shack, Mouser, Digi-Key, etc. that will allow you to wrap several turns 
of wire around half of the ferrite core that is temporarily opened, 
after which you can close it again. Keep adding more of these devices 
until you no longer have a problem.


73, Dale
WA8SRA


Brett gazdzinski wrote:

 Some caps across the speaker outputs cured it
totally!

Brett
N2DTS

  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Headphone output levels on the K2?

2007-06-12 Thread cloud runner
Some headfones have MUCH more gain with the K2 than others.  the Kenwood HS-5 
is a low impedance phone.  I put it on the speaker jack.  with that, I have to 
turn the AF gain down to almost 8 o'clock and the RF gain down to about 10 
o'clock to keep from blowing my head off with volume.

the HS-5 is monoaural as it comes form the manufacturer.  it came with a 1/4 
inch jack.  Change it to an 1/8 inch monoaural, and it will plug right in to 
the speaker jack on the back of the K2.

I reqired mine to stereo which can easily be done by popping the back off the 
the headfones.  The cable is already three wire, and simply requires moving one 
lead in the can to make it stereo.  If used with just a K2, however, this 
modification is not necessary.

72,  Fred - kt5x
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Wouldn't the suffix have to be include a number (i.e. /M0 or /R3) to be 
confused with a prefix?

Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 5:35 am, David Y. wrote:
/particularly /M, commonly used by mobile stations, a prefix assigned 
to the UK, and /R commonly used by repeaters, a prefix assigned to 
Russia, and used for special ham callsigns for Russian WW2 veterans.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Pelican case size for KX-1?

2007-06-12 Thread Chris Kantarjiev
I used the 1060, with no foam on the bottom. The KX1 is a pretty
robust little box already; the Pelican foam insert holds it
very securely, and there's little chance of the encoder knob 
hitting the top cover.

My setup is much like N2HTT's:

http://www.n2htt.net/KX1/

Except that I use 26g teflon-coated wire, which bundles up a lot
smaller.

73 de chris K6DBG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Re K2 ordering!

2007-06-12 Thread Brian Lloyd


On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:51 AM, F5UL wrote:


Hi Brian,
What you are trying to do for your GB Montessori School is exactly  
what I was going to do for a youg association here near Geneva. But  
I failes because I did not get any allocation for this project, as  
it was termed unnecessary!!!


I am lucky. The school is small and I am married to the  
headmistress. :-) OTOH, I did apply to the ARRL and they liked my  
proposal so they are providing the bulk of the equipment to pull this  
off. Now I have to construct the facilities.



Well
You did right with the K2, because when you finish  the kit, by the  
book, you know and understand the transceiver as much as their  
conceptors.


That is what I am thinking. As technology gets more and more complex,  
the prevailing sense is that ordinary people cannot understand it. We  
are creating a society of appliance operators. I am trying to counter  
that by bringing technical subjects back within the grasp of kids so  
that they understand that they CAN understand what is going on inside  
a computer, a cell phone, a television, a rocket, a radio, a robot, etc.


Arthur C. Clarke once stated in his third law, any sufficiently  
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. I think he was  
trying to point out that we can take things that appear magical and  
turn them into technology that we can understand. OTOH I can see that  
going back the other way. As the technology gets more complex people  
give up trying to understand it and it turns into magic. I want to  
try to stop that trend, at least for a small subset of children.


The Montessori method has children learning by manipulating. All  
their math is done by manipulation of things. The first-year children  
in a Montessori school tend to have as good a grasp of geometry as  
most high-school (years 9-12) children do. I am just taking that one  
step further and applying that to their science class as well.


Electricity is more difficult as one is dealing with an intangible so  
making it hands-on is more of a challenge. I will actually have  
several cathode-ray oscilloscopes for them to use. (Right now I have  
an HP-180A I am repairing and a Tek 465 that is working pretty well.)  
I taught myself to use a 'scope when I was in elementary school. I  
built my first 'scope from a kit (an Eico 435) when I was 11. A  
'scope is the most useful tool I have ever found for working on  
electronic equipment. I suspect that my fascination with the 'scope  
played a large part in my visual understanding of electronics.


I have one lab where they use a function generator and a 'scope to  
help the kids learn about the relationship between amplitude, time,  
frequency, and wavelength. It lets them view what they are learning  
and tie it to the geometry that has been the cornerstone of their math.


(BTW, in a Montessori school kindergarten students understand the  
concepts of multiplication, division, squares, and square roots. By  
the time they hit their 4th year they are surprisingly advanced in  
their grasp of mathematical concepts including the beginnings of  
algebra so I can begin to teach them the physics from a quantitative  
as well as a qualitative point of view. This year they were learning  
about ratio and proportion as applied to simple machines. The older  
kids designed and built their own throwing machines, e.g. mangonels,  
balistas, and trebuchets.)


As you intend, take the SSB module, beside fone you will be able to  
run digital mode too.


That is the idea. I am not sure I will get to the point where I can  
explain modulation from a mathematical point of view but I can give  
them the practical idea. I am looking around for a good, old spectrum  
analyzer so I can show them things in the frequency as well as the  
time domain.


I waited two years before ordering the KPA100 and it is not yet in  
service!


Thank you. I have had a couple of private messages say that too.


About a year after the K2 and SSB, I instaled the KAT2 antenna tuner.


I am hearing similar things from people.

So you can do lot of things whith QRP level and I will not change  
anything but for another K!!!


:-)


Good work Brian, best regards
F5UL/Bob


Thank you.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread Bill W5WVO
Most RF-spectrum noise generated by TV sets and computers and radiated by the 
power line is common-mode noise, and the typical differential-mode (in-line) 
power filter will do nothing to suppress it. You need to make a common-mode RF 
choke. Get some large ferrite toroid cores (Palomar Engineers as well as 
others sell them) and wind the entire power cord of the TV through a couple of 
these in series. (In less severe cases, just one toroid may do the trick.) The 
toroid needs to go as close to the TV set as possible, as any unshielded 
conductor between the toroid and the power supply will still radiate.


You can also encase the whole power cord in clamshell ferrites if you can find 
them in the correct size, but I've found this to be less effective than 
toroids. The benefit of this method is that you don't have to supply an 
extension cord to replace the length of the power cord you wound through the 
toroids.


Bill / W5WVO


Brett gazdzinski wrote:

I would ask the people if I could put a filter on the power
line to the TV.

That might reduce or eliminate the QRN.

Maybe get a surge protector/filter setup and convince them
it's a protection device for their investment.

I bought phone filters and installed them on the neighbors on both
sides of my house to eliminate the AM getting in the phones.
I also had to filter an audio system with extended speaker
wires as I came through quite loud even with the thing
turned off. Some caps across the speaker outputs cured it
totally!

Brett
N2DTS


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth A. Christiansen
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:50 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

I have K2 SN 1031 and an IC-746PRO. Last week my next door neighbor
brought home a large screen TV that looks to be the rear projection
type. I didn't pay much attention to it as they unloaded it
but now find
it puts out lots of QRN. It  puts out S9 on the PRO 60 HZ QRN
on 20, 15,
10 6 and 2 meters. Those are the bands I have antennas that work. The
noise blanker in theK2 and the PRO both eliminate this bad QRN right
down to the background noise :-)  when there are now strong
signals on
the band but when a strong station such as the W1AW code
sessions come
on 20 meters, (20 over 9 in ND), than the K2 using NB1 has problems 5
KHZ or so either side of W1AW. NB2 has problems up to 10 KHZ
either side
of W1AW and the PRO has problems 15 KHZ either side of W1AW
:-( . Is the
noise blanker on the K3 ahead of the roofing filter or behind the
roofing filter. If it is behind the roofing filter buying a
K3 might put
me back on the air :-)  but if it is ahead of the roofing filter
than would I have the same problem as the K2 :-( ? I have
looked at the
FAQ part of the Elecraft K3 site and do not find the answer to this
question. I just need a short answer so please do not start a long
thread on my station or observations etc.

73 and thanks for the help.

W0CZ
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread wayne burdick

Hi Ken,

The short answer is both.

The 1st I.F. noise blanker module is ahead of the roofing filters, so 
it can blank wideband pulse noise. It has a wide AGC range and various 
threshold and blanking width settings.


There's also a DSP noise blanker *after* the roofing filters. This 
blanker has the advantage of not being modulated by signals outside the 
roofing filter bandwidth. Of course you can't use it in all cases, 
because the roofing filter stretches the pulses and thus requires 
longer blanking times. But I have some noise on 160 m that the DSP 
blanker suppresses by some 40 dB, making otherwise completely inaudible 
signals stand out clearly. We're also experimenting with reconstructive 
blanking algorithms to make the DSP blanker even more effective.


The noise blanker LEVEL switch displays the parameters for both the 
hardware blanker and the DSP blanker on the VFO A and VFO B displays. 
You can then adjust either or both to see which is most effective on 
noise. The settings are stored on a per-band basis.


73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:50 AM, Kenneth A. Christiansen wrote:

Is the noise blanker on the K3 ahead of the roofing filter or behind 
the roofing filter?



---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Pelican case size for KX-1?

2007-06-12 Thread Paul - VE1DY

I use the 1120.  http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/ppike/kx1.html

I place two pieces of the pulled out foam on top of the rig to keep it
from moving vertically - foam on bottom too.

Paul


On 6/11/07, Mike Cizek  W3MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What size Pelican case do folks use for the KX-1??  I seem to remember it is
the 1060, but its internal height is barely more than the KX-1 itself.  Does
this provide enough clearance to protect the tuning knob?  For people using
this case - do you put any foam beneath the KX-1, or just let it sit on the
bottom of the case?  Thanks.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3

2007-06-12 Thread Franki ON5ZO

Hello to all.

I am new to this group and in the market for a new rig. I had a keen eye on 
another American brand that recently released a new rig. But then the K3 
popped up and made it to the top of my list.

I have two questions, sorry if they have been covered before.

1) Is the K3 ready to ship to EU when the next batch is available (CE 
label)?


2) Is the aux RX input (beverages and RX loops) available in the 'standard' 
K3/100? Or do I need an option (like ATU with 2nd Ant. Jack)?


Thanks for the input.

73 de Franki ON5ZO / OQ5M 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
I suspect John, GM4SLV, and Steve AA4AK are quite right about many responses
to those signing /QRP. 

I always perk up when I hear /QRP because it promises to be an unusually
interesting contact. When I call CQ on or near a QRP calling frequency
such as 7040 or 14060 I use 5 watts or less and sign /QRP myself. 

I hope the intrepid operators who love to promote their operating interests
will never stop signing /QRP. If someone considers a QRP signal as unworthy
of his or her time, that's their choice and I'm happy to help them avoid
being ambushed by an unrecognized QRP signal just because it happens to be
pounding in nice an strong at their end. 

Ron AC7AC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] RE:I ordered the mic kit ... but have a question

2007-06-12 Thread Gary Hvizdak
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 at 0836 Gene (WG7GW) wrote ...

Gary and Ken:

Love the Rework Eliminators. Am slowly working my way through  
a K2 construction. I ordered the mic kit ... but have a question.

Will this kit require re-soldering the current pin set on the front  
panel board? It's already in place. No, I have not soldered to the  
long pins on the back of the board.

Thanks in advance. I'm looking forward to this addition as well.

--

Hi Gene,

Thanks for writing.  The purpose of our Rework Eliminator(TM) products
is to eliminate the need for PCB rework while upgrading the K2 with options,
and where possible to avoid repeated disassembly of the enclosure.  In this
spirit, our new Internal Mic Adaptor (IMA) plugs right onto the existing Mic
Configuration header on the back of the K2's Front Panel board.

Obviously, for someone who has already completed assembly, they will
need to remove the Control board (once) to install the IMA.  However, after
that they'll be able to reconfigure their K2 for any supported mic by
removing just the left side panel of the enclosure.

--- - - - ---

What may have caused your confusion as you studied the mechanical mockup
photos on our http://www.unpcbs.com/ website, is our use of a rather unique
surface mount pass-though socket on the Mic Extender board.  With so little
space to work with between the K2's Front Panel and Control boards, the IMA
would not have fit using more conventional connectors.

73,
Gary  KI4GGX

Rework Eliminator is a trademark of K. Kaplan (WB2ART)  G. Hvizdak (KI4GGX)

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Pelican case size for K3?

2007-06-12 Thread Bill NY9H

I forgot to take real measurements at Dayton .

Any beta  or factory people able to share the actual dimensions from 
the front of the BIG tuning knob( assuming that is the most 
forward part)...
to the back of the fans...or the back of a right angle connector on 
one of the coax connectors... whichever is the rear most

And how tall is the 4 height ??  after measuring with the feet 

must be planning ahead, since there will be a shortage of K3 Pelican 
cases after July


bill

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
First of all, there was substantial interest in the K2 sitting alongside the
K3 at SeaPac in Oregon June 2 and 3. It's  a great rig and, as several
people pointed out, one is assembled at lower cost from individual parts. 

Elecraft just did a major update of the K2 Owner's Manual to be sure
everything was current and complete for those who will continue to buy K2's
for a long time to come.

I'd consider the analog or DSP audio filters entirely optional. I find the
basic I.F. filters in the K2 more than adequate for virtually any situation.
Sure, the denoiser is handy under tough signal conditions and the extra
selectivity is handy from time to time, especially if one needs the signal
to stand out alone from the QRM to copy it, but it's a significant cost for
something that isn't needed most of the time.

Was it the ARRL who recommended the Yaesu, Icom or Kenwood rigs? How dare
they leave Elecraft off of that list? If so, it's time to sharpen my
rhetoric (don't use a pencil much any more) and shoot off a letter (er...
Email) to Newington! 

Ron AC7AC



-Original Message-
As I think I have mentioned before, I am setting up a science and  
technology center in our school, Granite Bay Montessori School.  
(http://www.gbmontessori.com) We have received a grant from the ARRL  
to help populate the center with equipment including an amateur  
station. We have been asked for a list of what we would like and I  
have decided to go against the flow and request a K2 kit. (They were  
recommending we choose either a Yaesu FT-897, an Icom IC-706mkIIg, or  
a Kenwood TS-570SG.)

My plan is to have the all the kids work on the kit so that they have  
the feeling of both participation and accomplishment. I also plan to  
use the assembly and testing procedures to help cement what they are  
learning about electricity.

The radios mentioned above all fall into the sub $1000 range so that  
is a calibration point for what I think we can get away with  
spending. So my question here is, if you were going to outfit a K2  
and try to keep the price reasonable what would you get and what  
might you leave behind. As I see it, the absolute must-have items are:

1. the K2 itself (duh);
2. the SSB module.

After that it becomes a bit fuzzy. For instance, I would like  
opinions as to the need for the KPA-100. Note that if I don't opt for  
the KPA-100 I *will* get the KIO-2. Since I expect to be using this  
rig mostly in in the classroom with a matched antenna (I am leaning  
toward the GAP Titan DX as I have one and like it), I probably would  
not opt for the KAT-2. What about the DSP module?

The kids are learning the code and I hope/expect that there will be a  
fair amount of CW operation. (The kids actually think that learning  
the code will be a cool thing in and of itself. I am using the Code  
Quick system with them.) I also expect some SSB and digital (AFSK,  
PSK31, MFSK, SSTV, etc.) operation.

Anyway, I solicit the input from the folks on this list. You have a  
lot of experience with the product and can help me make the right  
decisions.

Thanks!

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3

2007-06-12 Thread ab7r
Hi Franki and thanks for the email.

I'm not sure about the first part of your question, will have to let Eric field 
that one, but I believe the answer is yes.

In order to use the RX in/out you will need the KXV3 option.  This provides the 
RX 
only connections as well as the in/out for transverter interfacing.  I think 
it's 
only around $79 for that option.

Welcome to the Elecraft group!

-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065

On Tue Jun 12 12:11 , Franki ON5ZO  sent:

Hello to all.

I am new to this group and in the market for a new rig. I had a keen eye on 
another American brand that recently released a new rig. But then the K3 
popped up and made it to the top of my list.
I have two questions, sorry if they have been covered before.

1) Is the K3 ready to ship to EU when the next batch is available (CE 
label)?

2) Is the aux RX input (beverages and RX loops) available in the 'standard' 
K3/100? Or do I need an option (like ATU with 2nd Ant. Jack)?

Thanks for the input.

73 de Franki ON5ZO / OQ5M 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Brett, N2DTS wrote:

If you really want to TRANSMIT the digital modes, I guess you would need the
KPA100,...

- 

Maybe for some modes. I haven't run all of them by any means. 

I get out fine using PSK31 at 5 watts or less! 

A few years ago it was uncommon to run into PSK stations running more than
10 watts or so. I haven't been on much lately, but it seems that more and
more stations in the 50 watt class are showing up on the common PSK
frequencies. All that means is that it's more important to tune in signals
using narrow filters (like any other mode) rather than dump the whole audio
bandwidth into the computer and do the filtering there looking at a
'waterfall' display. Trying to let the computer filter signals means the
receiver AGC is responding to the strongest signal in the passband and
suppressing all the others in proportion.  

Ron AC7AC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Mike Markowski
Ron  all,

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
 ...I hope the intrepid operators who love to promote their operating interests
 will never stop signing /QRP...

I share some of the feelings of both camps regarding signing or not signing
using /QRP.  As a result, I use a combination.  I generally call by txing:

cq cq cq de ab3ap/qrp ab3ap ab3ap

I put the /QRP in early so the responding op doesn't feel obligated to resend
it back to me, send it only once because it takes time, but send it more than
not at all so listeners know what that tiny signal is.

For what it's worth,
Mike  ab3ap
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3

2007-06-12 Thread Julian G4ILO

On 6/12/07, Franki ON5ZO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


1) Is the K3 ready to ship to EU when the next batch is available (CE
label)?


If you place an order now, you will have to wait until the second
batch (September) or perhaps even the third now, for shipment.

Fortunately the CE requirement does not apply, as it is a personal import.

I'll leave it to someone else to answer your second question.
--
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Brett gazdzinski
This was a good usable rig for very little money,
not sure if they are still selling the entire kits
or just the boards, or what, but for $80.00, it
was a well working radio, and easy to build.



 http://emtech.steadynet.com/nw.shtml



All the verticals I ever used had VERY narrow bandwidths
on the lower bands, my butternut has about 40kc on 80 and if I add 
the 160 coil, that's about 10 khz before the swr is high!
Maybe the gap stuff works different?


Its great the kids show ANY interest is anything other
than TV or video games. In my day, I built a 6SN7 regen
out of the encyclopedia we had (world book).
Next was a 6146 xtal transmitter.
What fun!

I cant say I think I learned anything in school after about
5th gradeeven science class was dull!

Sounds like you are doing great work.


Brett
N2DTS



 
 On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Brett gazdzinski wrote:
 
  Well, you need to get the antenna, coax, a key, microphone?
 
 Yes, sorry, I should have indicated that I also have on my list of  
 equipment:
 
 1. a GAP Titan DX 80M-10M vertical antenna;
 2. 40M of RG-213 or LMR-400 coax;
 3. assorted connectors;
 4. a bencher iambic key;
 5. a straight key (I have a J-38 I have just restored).
 
 I had forgotten a microphone but will probably get a good cardioid  
 dynamic mic.
 
  I would nix the KPA100, and the DSP, and even the SSB option as
  you can receive ssb fine on the base K2.
 
 I understand but I want the kids to have the opportunity to operate  
 voice and digital modes too.
 
  It might be more fun to put up a G5RV and use the low power
  auto tuner, you can go anyplace on any band that way.
 
 I may be limited in horizontal space to do that.
 
  If you really want to TRANSMIT the digital modes,
 
 Yes.
 
  I guess
  you would need the KPA100, but without a tuner, the swr
  needs to be almost zero, something most multi band
  antenna's will not do over a useful frequency range
  on the lower bands.
 
 I have a GAP Titan DX that was given to me. I was skeptical at first  
 but now am a believer. It has amazing bandwidth with lower SWR.
 
  You can receive the digital modes fine with the base K2 I guess.
 
  You could build the K2 this year and next year build options,
  or are you going to build a K2 every year?
 
 Well, the K2 will be the school rig. Some of the kids have expressed  
 an interest in building their own stations. This is why I am  
 introducing CW early as QRP CW is certainly the least expensive way  
 for a kid to have his/her own station. I will probably pick out an  
 inexpensive QRP transceiver kit for them to build. Since the school  
 usually pays for projects like this the K1 might be a bit out of  
 reach. (Hey Wayne! Do you have a good educational discount? :-) I am  
 leaning toward something like the Small Wonder SW+ transceiver kits  
 and let the kids build their own enclosures in wood shop.
 
  It seems to me like building a K1 or K2 would teach students
  a lot more useful info than most of the other stuff in school.
 
 Ah, you understand where I am going with this then.
 
 Brian Lloyd 3191 Western Drive
 brianl AT lloyd DOT com Cameron Park, CA 95682
 +1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
 
 There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest.  A good  
 citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.
 
 PGP key ID:  12095C52A32A1B6C
 PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0  CC09 1209 5C52 
 A32A 1B6C
 
 
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Fred (FL)
I wonder how a whole class of students, some
with potentially no electronics or mechanical
skills - could do, building a K2 HF Transceiver?

Who would ride herd over them, steer them,
and check their work as they soldered and placed
100's and 100's of electronic and mechanical
parts in place, in the correct order, position,
and polarity?

You might have better success, and a considerably
better communications radio, by going with the
K3 - even the 10watt model, with SSB and etc.
For under $1400 - you'd have a much better
radio.  And one wouldn't have to be concerned
with 35 students and their associated
soldering skills.  :)  :(   Rather than solder
all class long - they could study, and
be presented the theory and idea behind each
of the K3 pre-built modules.

Just a thot .

Long long time back, I took a 10-week Electronics
course in Ft. Erie, Canada - and there we each
built a simple superhetrodyne AM radio.  Very
simple, and it even had tubes.  But we learned
the electronics theory about each item, as
we built that radio.

That simple course sparked something in me,
and I went to attend the Univ. of Buffalo's
SUNY EE School - and did right well
there, graduated in 73.

Good luck on your fine educational class!
Sounds like a fun job
Fred, de N3CSY FL/NY


   

Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. 
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545469
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] [Fwd: Re: K3, CE Zeichen und AFU-Geraete]

2007-06-12 Thread Toby Deinhardt

I hope Eric will not mind forwarding this...

 Original Message 
Subject: Re: K3, CE Zeichen und AFU-Geraete
Date: 28 Apr 2007 23:19:00 -0700
From: Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm already very involved in this. The K3 will carry the CE mark before 
we ship it to Eu.


73,
Eric
_..._




vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3

2007-06-12 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hallo Julian,


Fortunately the CE requirement does not apply, as it is a personal import.


AFAIK the CE marking is not always necessary for kits, otherwise whether 
personal import or not, the CE marking is always required, even for 
stuff like a penlight!


The CE marking is not required for customs, but without it, it is highly 
questionable that you are allowed to operate the equipment, assuming it 
is not homebrew or a kit.


I'm not a lawyer, so ymmv.

vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Well, there's the huge difference between us Mike. I call W3XYX W3XYZ W3XYZ
DE AC7AC AC7AC AC7AC/QRP ;-)

Same for CQ. My thinking is that if hearing the /QRP is going to confuse
anyone, I want them to get the call right first. 

As for a QRP signal being 'tiny', it all depends upon conditions. Digging
out weak signals can be fun. I do it out of habit. I find I'm digging in
the mud for a 100 watt or greater signal at least as often as a QRP signal.


I've given and received lots of 579 to 599 reports and enjoyed long, long
rag chews when we're both running 5 watts or less to suggest that QRP is not
a all a tiny signal when conditions are right.

Ron AC7AC 


-Original Message-

Ron  all,

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
 ...I hope the intrepid operators who love to promote their operating 
 interests will never stop signing /QRP...

I share some of the feelings of both camps regarding signing or not signing
using /QRP.  As a result, I use a combination.  I generally call by txing:

cq cq cq de ab3ap/qrp ab3ap ab3ap

I put the /QRP in early so the responding op doesn't feel obligated to
resend it back to me, send it only once because it takes time, but send it
more than not at all so listeners know what that tiny signal is.

For what it's worth,
Mike  ab3ap
_

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] first snag

2007-06-12 Thread Richard Kent
Hello Mike,
Don Wilhelm usually sees these requests. Until he sees it try
checking the cap values in the vco circuit mis-interpreting the value is a
source of the symptoms you have. Check soldering, Check soldering, Check
components and then soldering. Check bad soldering/tinning of t5. If there
is a reason that you think t5 is mis-wound then by all means rewind it. If
it is a hunch check the other components and soldering first

Happy Building
Rick Kent WD8AJG K2 5296  5996
 

   hello all, 

 

Well, I hit my first snag with k2 # 5723. 

 

On page 61 of the manual in the vco alignment, I measured the
voltage of r30 first out at 2.33. that was with the tuning slug, L30 turned
all the way in. turning the slug out the voltage changed to 2.44. this is no
where near the 6 volts. My question is, the manual says if the voltage does
not change, refer to troubleshooting. I can't find anything in
troubleshooting that refers to this. With the small change, I am afraid I
will need to rewind t5. 

 

Anyone have the same problem? Words of wisdom in winding t5/

 

73 mike ku4yp 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Gary D Krause
I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does it 
meet your expectations?


The reason I am asking is because, I have the SSB board ready to install.  I 
have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW mode and I really like it 
since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP that works great on SSB so, 
I'm trying to decide if it's really worth installing the SSB option.  So, I'm 
trying to gather as many opinions as possible so that I can sit and torture 
myself further. :-)  I did own an Argonaut V for about eight months.  It would 
put out about 20 watts which made SSB a bit more of a challenge.  Since I have 
the Kenwood that will put out 170 watts, believe it or not, I'm thinking that 
I would probably not use the SSB option unless it's for QRP SSB.


Your opinions are welcome.  I should mention that I'm not planning to add the 
100 watt amp to the K2.  If I'm going to do that, I'll just buy a K3!  I also 
work a lot of QRP CW.


Thanks,
Gary, N7HTS



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Darwin, Keith
I found SSB at 10 watts to be a challenge.  I run mostly CW and didn't
want to work at the few SSB contacts I make per year.

At the same time I compared the K2's receiver with my 830s and found the
K2 to be much nicer so I sold the 830s and put in the 100 watt PA.  Then
I went back to CW.  I haven't had the mic hooked up since I did my first
post-build testing.

- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411.ssb.100 - 

-Original Message-
From: Gary D Krause

I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does
it meet your expectations?

...I have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW mode and I
really like it since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP that
works great on SSB so, I'm trying to decide if it's really worth
installing the SSB option.  
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Sandy
Can't agree with you more Ron!  I think I've had more polite QSO's with 
QRPers than other random contacts.  Another bunch that will spend some good 
QSO time with you other than the:  Good meeting you, RST, QTH, Op, 73 
QSO, is the FISTS group.  Way too many fellows these days who plain don't 
want to talk and ragchew on CW.  I have run into a lot of shooters, 
pilots, ship operators accidently while laying out fragments of my bio on 
CW QSO's.  I feel VERY uncomfortable getting a 589/599 report when running 5 
watters, then finding out the guy on the other end, who is maybe 349 or 459 
is running 100 watts!


72/72,

Sandy
Mostly W5TVW/QRP
- Original Message - 
From: Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP


Well, there's the huge difference between us Mike. I call W3XYX W3XYZ 
W3XYZ

DE AC7AC AC7AC AC7AC/QRP ;-)

Same for CQ. My thinking is that if hearing the /QRP is going to confuse
anyone, I want them to get the call right first.

As for a QRP signal being 'tiny', it all depends upon conditions. Digging
out weak signals can be fun. I do it out of habit. I find I'm digging in
the mud for a 100 watt or greater signal at least as often as a QRP 
signal.



I've given and received lots of 579 to 599 reports and enjoyed long, long
rag chews when we're both running 5 watts or less to suggest that QRP is 
not

a all a tiny signal when conditions are right.

Ron AC7AC


-Original Message-

Ron  all,

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

...I hope the intrepid operators who love to promote their operating
interests will never stop signing /QRP...


I share some of the feelings of both camps regarding signing or not 
signing

using /QRP.  As a result, I use a combination.  I generally call by txing:

cq cq cq de ab3ap/qrp ab3ap ab3ap

I put the /QRP in early so the responding op doesn't feel obligated to
resend it back to me, send it only once because it takes time, but send it
more than not at all so listeners know what that tiny signal is.

For what it's worth,
Mike  ab3ap
_

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007 
6:39 AM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Curt Milton
Gary

the K2 works nifty on SSB, either as a 15 or 100 watt
radio.  even with only a vertical I would not hesitate
to call someone DX on 20m.  of course its easier when
sunspots are higher!  i have made many contest QSO's
running SSB QRP.  and this is a great rig for running
PSK31.  so if you have the board go ahead and install
it!  

count the dB's carefully and convert them to the
number of S-units.  i am not saying don't QRO, as when
i discovered working DX on 80m CW is interesting I
added 100w to my K2.  i won't debate the K2 vs. K3
trade!  converted to $ per dB of performance, i am not
sure where this will fall.  

73, curt

--- Gary D Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was just wondering how many here use SSB with
 their 15 watt K2?  Does it 
 meet your expectations?
 
 The reason I am asking is because, I have the SSB
 board ready to install.  I 
 have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW
 mode and I really like it 
 since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP
 that works great on SSB so, 
 I'm trying to decide if it's really worth installing
 the SSB option.  So, I'm 
 trying to gather as many opinions as possible so
 that I can sit and torture 
 myself further. :-)  I did own an Argonaut V for
 about eight months.  It would 
 put out about 20 watts which made SSB a bit more of
 a challenge.  Since I have 
 the Kenwood that will put out 170 watts, believe it
 or not, I'm thinking that 
 I would probably not use the SSB option unless it's
 for QRP SSB.
 
 Your opinions are welcome.  I should mention that
 I'm not planning to add the 
 100 watt amp to the K2.  If I'm going to do that,
 I'll just buy a K3!  I also 
 work a lot of QRP CW.
 
 Thanks,
 Gary, N7HTS
 
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 



   

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Don Wilhelm

Gary,

QRP SSB contacts can be plentiful, so just put the SSB option in - you 
can also run soundcard digital modes if you want.


I usually stay away from the 80 meter roundtables where everyone is 
bragging about how much power they are running - you will just not move 
their S-meters up into the 40 over mark and those folks will frown on 
anyone who does not do that.


73,
Don W3FPR

Gary D Krause wrote:
I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does 
it meet your expectations?


The reason I am asking is because, I have the SSB board ready to 
install.  I have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW mode 
and I really like it since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP 
that works great on SSB so, I'm trying to decide if it's really worth 
installing the SSB option.  So, I'm trying to gather as many opinions as 
possible so that I can sit and torture myself further. :-)  I did own an 
Argonaut V for about eight months.  It would put out about 20 watts 
which made SSB a bit more of a challenge.  Since I have the Kenwood that 
will put out 170 watts, believe it or not, I'm thinking that I would 
probably not use the SSB option unless it's for QRP SSB.


Your opinions are welcome.  I should mention that I'm not planning to 
add the 100 watt amp to the K2.  If I'm going to do that, I'll just buy 
a K3!  I also work a lot of QRP CW.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread Kevin Rock
Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW operator to join 
them for Field Day?  
   Kevin.  KD5ONS
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread Jozef Hand-Boniakowski
Yes.  And, this is the FISTS 10th anniversary this year.  To celebrate 
FISTS is offering the 20/20 award.  Your work 20 FISTS for 20 minutes 
each (at least) in each of the 12 months during 2007.  The first month 
you get the certificate and and sticker for that month (say January).  
Then for each successive month you do it again and get another stick 
(for that month).  Get all twelve (20 QSOs X 20 minutes per month X 12 
months) and you get plaque for the anniversary award.  To allow late 
comers to get the plaque, you get a free month sticker for any two 
consecutive months the feat is achieved.  These can be used for missed 
months.  The conversations have been wonderful.  See awards at 
http://www.fists.org


73, Jozef
FISTS 12313 CC 1875

Sandy wrote:
Can't agree with you more Ron!  I think I've had more polite QSO's 
with QRPers than other random contacts.  Another bunch that will spend 
some good QSO time with you other than the:  Good meeting you, RST, 
QTH, Op, 73 QSO, is the FISTS group.  Way too many fellows these 
days who plain don't want to talk and ragchew on CW.  I have run 
into a lot of shooters, pilots, ship operators accidently while 
laying out fragments of my bio on CW QSO's.  I feel VERY 
uncomfortable getting a 589/599 report when running 5 watters, then 
finding out the guy on the other end, who is maybe 349 or 459 is 
running 100 watts!


72/72,

Sandy
Mostly W5TVW/QRP
- Original Message - From: Ron D'Eau Claire 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Signing /QRP


Well, there's the huge difference between us Mike. I call W3XYX 
W3XYZ W3XYZ

DE AC7AC AC7AC AC7AC/QRP ;-)

Same for CQ. My thinking is that if hearing the /QRP is going to confuse
anyone, I want them to get the call right first.

As for a QRP signal being 'tiny', it all depends upon conditions. 
Digging
out weak signals can be fun. I do it out of habit. I find I'm digging 
in
the mud for a 100 watt or greater signal at least as often as a QRP 
signal.



I've given and received lots of 579 to 599 reports and enjoyed long, 
long
rag chews when we're both running 5 watts or less to suggest that QRP 
is not

a all a tiny signal when conditions are right.

Ron AC7AC


-Original Message-

Ron  all,

Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

...I hope the intrepid operators who love to promote their operating
interests will never stop signing /QRP...


I share some of the feelings of both camps regarding signing or not 
signing
using /QRP.  As a result, I use a combination.  I generally call by 
txing:


cq cq cq de ab3ap/qrp ab3ap ab3ap

I put the /QRP in early so the responding op doesn't feel obligated to
resend it back to me, send it only once because it takes time, but 
send it

more than not at all so listeners know what that tiny signal is.

For what it's worth,
Mike  ab3ap
_

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 
6/12/2007 6:39 AM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Signing /QRP

2007-06-12 Thread J F
I respectfully disagree with the argument that folks
with small signals are QRP or that running more
power makes you less likely to ragchew on CW.

I know many QRPers who have significant antenna
systems and many 100 watters that have piss poor
antennas.

You can argue that folks who operate around the QRP
frequencies are more likely to ragchew, be more
polite, or whatever.

My feeling is that folks who have built their own
equipment and/or antennas, or who have challenges to
just get on the air are more likely to chew the fat.
Mostly because they are happy to play with hand-ons
stuff.

Cheers,
Julius
n2wn
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Richard Kent


The K2 is my only low bands radio. I use at home and at scout camp for
demos. Phone and digital. Use it. It work well.

Rick Kent WD8AJG K2 5296
-Original Message-

I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does it 
meet your expectations?

The reason I am asking is because, I have the SSB board ready to install.  I

have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW mode and I really like
it 
since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP that works great on SSB
so, 
I'm trying to decide if it's really worth installing the SSB option.  So,
I'm 
trying to gather as many opinions as possible so that I can sit and torture 
myself further. :-)  I did own an Argonaut V for about eight months.  It
would 
put out about 20 watts which made SSB a bit more of a challenge.  Since I
have 
the Kenwood that will put out 170 watts, believe it or not, I'm thinking
that 
I would probably not use the SSB option unless it's for QRP SSB.

Your opinions are welcome.  I should mention that I'm not planning to add
the 
100 watt amp to the K2.  If I'm going to do that, I'll just buy a K3!  I
also 
work a lot of QRP CW.

Thanks,
Gary, N7HTS

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Gary D Krause
Okay, I've decided to install the SSB option.  After all, I paid for it so I 
might as well use it.  I have a Kenwood MC-60A mic that I'm going to use with 
it.  I hope to work some of you guys on the air.  Thanks for all of your 
input.


Gary, N7HTS


On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:49:11 -0600
 Gary D Krause [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does it 
meet your expectations?


The reason I am asking is because, I have the SSB board ready to install.  I 
have been using the basic K2 the last few days in CW mode and I really like 
it since I work mostly CW.  I have a Kenwood TS-530SP that works great on SSB 
so, I'm trying to decide if it's really worth installing the SSB option.  So, 
I'm trying to gather as many opinions as possible so that I can sit and 
torture myself further. :-)  I did own an Argonaut V for about eight months. 
It would put out about 20 watts which made SSB a bit more of a challenge. 
Since I have the Kenwood that will put out 170 watts, believe it or not, I'm 
thinking that I would probably not use the SSB option unless it's for QRP 
SSB.


Your opinions are welcome.  I should mention that I'm not planning to add 
the 100 watt amp to the K2.  If I'm going to do that, I'll just buy a K3!  I 
also work a lot of QRP CW.


Thanks,
Gary, N7HTS



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker

2007-06-12 Thread Don Rasmussen
Holy cow, this is the first radio I'll have owned that
did this.

By the way, where is it? (the radio). ;-)

Hi Ken,
The short answer is both.
snip
The settings are stored on a per-band basis.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread John Magliacane
 I was just wondering how many here use SSB with their 15 watt K2?  Does it 
 meet your expectations?

Hi Gary.

I put my K2 on the air (SSB) and made a number of contacts on 20 and 80 meters
before even opening the KPA100 parts box.

If I didn't tell people I was running only 15 watts at the time, I don't think
many of them would have known.  :-)

There are just s many variables involved in propagation that under many
circumstances, a 10 dB signal deficit may not be as drastic as one might think.


73, de John, KD2BD


Visit John on the Web at:

http://kd2bd.ham.org/
.
.
.
.


   

Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mailp=summer+activities+for+kidscs=bz
 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Making Interesting QSOs (WAS: Signing /QRP)

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Sandy, those are *great* points! 

I have had a lot of new ops say that they have a very hard time chewing the
rag on CW because they can't really formulate things to say AND concentrate
on sending good CW. I suggest they write down some mini-bios that would fit
into a transmission that they can just copy as need be and append an open
ended question to the comment! For example:

BN POUNDING BRASS FOR 5 YRS NOW ES LOVE IT X HW DID U GET INTO HAM RADIO?

Or (for the Married with Children fans)

IM AN EX SHOE SALESMAN X MY TV SERIES WAS CANCELLED, MY KIDS GREW UP ES MY
XYL WANTED ME OUT OF HER LIVING ROOM SO I GOT MY HAM LICENSE X SHE LIKES CW
BECAUSE I CANT SEND AND STICK MY HANDS IN MY BELT AT THE SAME TIME X HOW DID
YOU GET INTO THE HOBBY?

Of course, one of my favorites is RIG HR ELECRAFT K2 X BUILT IT IN 2000. LV
BUILDING. WHATS UR FAVORITE HAM ACTIVITY?

I got a reply once, RIG HR KX1. BUILDING. BUILDING. BUILDING. DON'T KNOW
WHAT'S NUMBER FOUR YET. 

For folks out there who have a hard time thinking and sending each one on a
card so you can pick one out quickly. And, I can tell you from experience,
one day you'll realize you aren't using the cards any more. You're just
talking with a new friend on the air...

Ron AC7AC

 

-Original Message-

Can't agree with you more Ron!  I think I've had more polite QSO's with 
QRPers than other random contacts.  Another bunch that will spend some good 
QSO time with you other than the:  Good meeting you, RST, QTH, Op, 73 
QSO, is the FISTS group.  Way too many fellows these days who plain don't 
want to talk and ragchew on CW.  I have run into a lot of shooters, 
pilots, ship operators accidently while laying out fragments of my bio on 
CW QSO's.  I feel VERY uncomfortable getting a 589/599 report when running 5

watters, then finding out the guy on the other end, who is maybe 349 or 459 
is running 100 watts!

72/72,

Sandy
Mostly W5TVW/QRP

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 and SSB

2007-06-12 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
There's a small but significant advantage to staying with the standard
Elecraft OPT1 filter bandpass, rather than using one of the wider bandpasses
you can achieve with the optional capacitor kit. The narrower bandwidth
helps the S/N radio. The less bandwidth the 5 watts occupies, the louder
it'll be at the receiving end. 

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-

Okay, I've decided to install the SSB option.  After all, I paid for it so I

might as well use it.  I have a Kenwood MC-60A mic that I'm going to use
with 
it.  I hope to work some of you guys on the air.  Thanks for all of your 
input.

Gary, N7HTS


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Strange KPA100 behavior

2007-06-12 Thread Mike Geddes

Don,

This evening I have had a chance to look at my KPA100 again.  I verified 
that I am still unable to control output above 11 watts . . . .  above 11 
watss it is putting out 165 watts (connected to Bird 43 meter) and showing 
7:1 SWR on K2 display.  Below 11 watts the output seems correct. I was 
incorrect in an earlier email.


I DO have blue toroids at L16 and RFC1, and L15 is empty.  I did verify that 
C31 is .22mF (m22J63).


I checked T4 . . . looks okay and I seem to have proper resistance between 
1/3 and 2/4. And I do have continuity between 1/4.


One curious observation . . . as I was working through the check and 
alignment process again, I can only get 26.5k and 27.1k out of R26 and R27, 
versus the 43k recommended for C1 adjustment.


Not sure what to look at from this point?  Sorry for the prior 
misinformation.  Any suggestions?


Thanks,

Mike
N4JX

- Original Message - 
From: Don Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Mike Geddes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Strange KPA100 behavior



Mike,

Is the K2 displaying 165 watts?  Or is the K2 displaying 0.2 watts or 
lower while an external wattmeter is displaying 165 watts?
What is your test setup that gives you a 7:1 SWR?  If you are feeding a 
resistive 50 ohm dummy load with good coax, the wattmeter (either internal 
or external) should read 1:1 even with a KPA100 problem.


Tell us more so we can help with your problem -
Taking a very wild guess, you either have a non-functioning wattmeter in 
the KPA100, or the KPA100 wattmeter is not calibrated, or you have a 
parasitic oscillation in the KPA100.


Since this is a new kit - do you have blue toroid cores at L16 and RFC1 or 
do you have red toroids at L15 and L16?  And tell us what the value of C31 
is and whether you determined the value by looking at the capacitor 
(preferred) or whether you just looked at the parts list/schematic.


We need the answers to all these questions before we can advise you 
further.


73,
Don W3FPR

Mike Geddes wrote:
Greetings. I recently finished my K2 KPA100 kit. It seemed to work okay 
initially, then last night started to exhibit some strange behavior.  It 
would transmit correct power on tune under 11 watts (and show low SWR), 
but on anything over 11 watts, on tune, it would transmit around 165 
watts and show an SWR of around 7:1!!  And giving High Current message Is 
there anything I should start looking for initially?


Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike
N4JX





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Feed PTT thru coax for DB6NT Transceiver

2007-06-12 Thread Martin RATH

Don and Tom,

Thanks to both of you for your answers. I understand the flexibility 
that 8R gives your in term of T/R switching. Can I still feed my +8V to 
the center pin of the coax to switch my Transverter thrue the RF in ?


Tom I saw your t-r switch ! If I understand it right on TX there is +6V 
on P1-8. Could I use these 6V (as i need a 3-15v range) and feed them to 
the coax ?


Sorry for all my dumy questions !

Sincerly

Martin
DD4UKP / F4UKP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread John H Gibson
I just finished reading a book, CRYSTAL CLEAR, by Richard J. Thompson Jr. The 
book presents the fascinating history of the World-War-II effort to provide 
crystal frequency control for military radios. This was critically important, 
because radios without crystal control drifted badly, which made net operation 
difficult and also made it impossible to assign closely-spaced radio channels.

The book was announced in the New Book section of the June 2006 QST. The 
book's author had written a nice summary article on the same topic that 
appeared in the January 2004 QST.

I make mention of the book here because I know that many members of the 
Elecraft list have long memories and share my fascination with radio's 
technical 
history. (Like Ron, AC7AC, I too remember Edward R. Murrow's reports from 
London during the Blitz.)

I do not know Professor Thompson, and I have no vested interest in the sale of 
his book.

73,
John, no8v
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Feed PTT thru coax for DB6NT Transceiver

2007-06-12 Thread Don Wilhelm

Martin,

I would not recommend that you take the 8 volts out of the K2.

As an alternative, develop the required DC voltage at the transverter 
end, and then ground it during transmit with the K2 amp keying circuit.


OR - key a relay at the K2 end with the amp keying circuit, then use the 
relay contacts to apply voltage (from a separate supply) to the 
transverter.  The 8 volts inside the K2 should not be loaded down with 
external devices.  If the current requirement is very low, it may be OK, 
but in this case, we do not know the current requirement, so a relay is 
my recommended solution.


73,
Don W3FPR

Martin RATH wrote:

Don and Tom,

Thanks to both of you for your answers. I understand the flexibility 
that 8R gives your in term of T/R switching. Can I still feed my +8V to 
the center pin of the coax to switch my Transverter thrue the RF in ?


Tom I saw your t-r switch ! If I understand it right on TX there is +6V 
on P1-8. Could I use these 6V (as i need a 3-15v range) and feed them to 
the coax ?



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2: Size of RFC15 - No different from green ones

2007-06-12 Thread David Woolley
The manual says that RFC15, as well as being tan coloured, should be 
much smaller than the other 100 microHenry chokes, but it appears to be 
the same size as the four green ones, namely about 6.3 mm long by 2.1 mm 
diameter.  The obvious reason for this was that it was being used to 
patch between pads that are only about 3 mm apart.


Is there now no real difference except colour?

--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Strange KPA100 behavior

2007-06-12 Thread Don Wilhelm

Mike,

Fine, and thanks for clarifying that you do have the latest level KPA100.

The fact that you have lower than expected resistances at R26 and R27 
suggest that you may have something wrong with U5 (it could be damaged).


Initially, you should make the DC voltage measurements on U5 and U6 and 
Q10 and Q11 (see the DC voltage chart at the end of the manual).


The prime suspects for a problem like yours are D16 and D17, T4, U5, U6 
Q10 and Q11 - of course the associated resistors can be suspect too, but 
are usually not a problem if it worked before. (if it has never worked, 
check the resistors associated with the devices listed above (see the 
schematic to identify the resistors).


Since your KPA100 is producing maximum power, I suggest that you remove 
the power from the KPA100 and feed only the DC coaxial connector on the 
base K2 - that will limit the power output to the QRP level (but it will 
still produce maximum power from the base K2, so keep the keydown 
periods short.


If the DC voltage measurements check out with no problem indication, I 
can help you trace the detected voltage from R26 through to the VRFDET 
signal.


73,
Don W3FPR


Mike Geddes wrote:

Don,

This evening I have had a chance to look at my KPA100 again.  I verified 
that I am still unable to control output above 11 watts . . . .  above 
11 watss it is putting out 165 watts (connected to Bird 43 meter) and 
showing 7:1 SWR on K2 display.  Below 11 watts the output seems correct. 
I was incorrect in an earlier email.


I DO have blue toroids at L16 and RFC1, and L15 is empty.  I did verify 
that C31 is .22mF (m22J63).


I checked T4 . . . looks okay and I seem to have proper resistance 
between 1/3 and 2/4. And I do have continuity between 1/4.


One curious observation . . . as I was working through the check and 
alignment process again, I can only get 26.5k and 27.1k out of R26 and 
R27, versus the 43k recommended for C1 adjustment.


Not sure what to look at from this point?  Sorry for the prior 
misinformation.  Any suggestions?



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] OT: large scale production of quartz crystals during WWII

2007-06-12 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL

Of course, one of the pioneers was Hazard Reeves (K2GL, SK in 1986).
Buz was a world class engineer and beyond that, is still well known
for the winning-est Multi-Multi Contest Station in history (I
operated there from 1976 to 1986).  In fact, the Multi-Multi Category
was invented because of Buz' operations in the CQWW DX Contest.  He
won everything, so they created a new category to distinguish what he
was doing from what others were doing.  Can you imagine competing head
to head as a Single-Op with M/M because there was only one category?
LOL

I don't know if Hazard Reeves is mentioned in the book or not, but if
not, he should be.

http://www.ieee-uffc.org/fc_history/bottom.html

http://www.tedlind.net/Dickinson%20Paper.htm

de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread Bruce McLaughlin
Wayne:

Your mention of some reconstructive algorithms was very interesting to
me.  For some time, I've wondered if it would be possible to have a
circuit which would regenerate a CW signal and play it back in a noise
free environment.  I'm not an engineer, but I seem to remember that work
was done a number of years back with UARTs and the like to regenerate
fading or noisy TTY signals and they seemed to work reasonably well.  At
the very least, such a system might provide considerably improved copy
under heavy noise conditions.  I don't know of any other radio currently
using audio reconstruction.  Perhaps it's because it doesn't work or
hasn't been high on the priority list.  In any case, I think it's a very
interesting idea.

Bruce -- W8FU

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wayne burdick
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:58 AM
To: Kenneth A. Christiansen
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

Hi Ken,

The short answer is both.

The 1st I.F. noise blanker module is ahead of the roofing filters, so 
it can blank wideband pulse noise. It has a wide AGC range and various 
threshold and blanking width settings.

There's also a DSP noise blanker *after* the roofing filters. This 
blanker has the advantage of not being modulated by signals outside the 
roofing filter bandwidth. Of course you can't use it in all cases, 
because the roofing filter stretches the pulses and thus requires 
longer blanking times. But I have some noise on 160 m that the DSP 
blanker suppresses by some 40 dB, making otherwise completely inaudible 
signals stand out clearly. We're also experimenting with reconstructive 
blanking algorithms to make the DSP blanker even more effective.

The noise blanker LEVEL switch displays the parameters for both the 
hardware blanker and the DSP blanker on the VFO A and VFO B displays. 
You can then adjust either or both to see which is most effective on 
noise. The settings are stored on a per-band basis.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:50 AM, Kenneth A. Christiansen wrote:

 Is the noise blanker on the K3 ahead of the roofing filter or behind 
 the roofing filter?


---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Brian Lloyd

On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

First of all, there was substantial interest in the K2 sitting  
alongside the

K3 at SeaPac in Oregon June 2 and 3. It's  a great rig and, as several
people pointed out, one is assembled at lower cost from individual  
parts.


They are different and I certainly see value in both. I don't think  
that the K3 replaces the K2 or vice versa.


Was it the ARRL who recommended the Yaesu, Icom or Kenwood rigs?  
How dare

they leave Elecraft off of that list? If so, it's time to sharpen my
rhetoric (don't use a pencil much any more) and shoot off a letter  
(er...

Email) to Newington!


It is probably not fair to say that they recommended them. I know  
they are trying to put together packages for schools and they  
provided a package list that would be adequate for a school. I  
suspect that in many cases the trustee/elmer might not be all that  
technical or might be a newly-minted licensee and not really familiar  
with what might be needed.


Also consider that they want these stations to go up and get kids on- 
the-air. Having to build the rig would, in many cases, keep that from  
happening. After talking with me and knowing my background they were  
quite supportive of my idea to get the K2 and build it with the kids.


So don't go beating up on them yet. :-)

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] OT: more on Xtals K2GL

2007-06-12 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL

http://www.cineramaadventure.com/reeves.htm
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] OT: large scale production of quartz crystals during WWII

2007-06-12 Thread Jack Smith
For more reading, the IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency 
Control Society has a collection of crystal tutorial papers at 
http://www.ieee-uffc.org/fcmain.asp?view=review#tutor


International Crystal has also collected many historical papers on 
crystal control, accessible via http://www.icmfg.com/frequencycontrol.html.



Jack K8ZOA
www.cliftonlaboratories.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 6/12/07 3:41:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW operator to 
 join them for Field Day?  
 

If there aren't, why not start your own? That's what I did many years ago, 
when I got fed up with the local clubs' approach to FD.

Doesn't have to be a formal club, just a Field Day group. 

73 de Jim, N2EY

Grand Poobah, Jug Southgate's Bunch


**
 See 
what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 6/12/07 6:34:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:


 because radios without crystal control drifted badly, which made net 
 operation 
 difficult and also made it impossible to assign closely-spaced radio 
 channels.
 

I don't think that was the reason for crystal control.

The WW2 ARC-5 HF sets were not crystal controlled, and they were used in 
net operations. Same for the BC-191/375 and ART-13 sets, and many others.

I think the big reasons for crystal control was to eliminate the need for 
tuning either the receiver or transmitter, and to eliminate the need for a 
trained radio operator. The BC-611 walkie-talkie is the extreme example.

73 de Jim, N2EY


**
 See what's free at 
http://www.aol.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3 Noise Blanker ahead or behind roofing filter?

2007-06-12 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy

Bruce McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I don't know of any other radio currently
using audio reconstruction.  Perhaps it's because it doesn't work or
hasn't been high on the priority list.  In any case, I think it's a very
interesting idea.




A possible reason for this might be that it becomes quite boring to listen 
to QRM and noise free CW signals after a while, putting audio reconstruction 
low on the priority list. However it is a very useful tool to have when 
searching for beacons or other signals at or just below the receiver plus 
antenna noise floor on 10m and higher frequencies.


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread Steve
I'm not sure where you mean by N.W. Oregon but the Valley Radio Club of Eugene 
will have an operation. 
If you're interested just ask on the 146.72 (W7PXL) repeater.

Whenever I've been on the road over field day, I've just asked around on the 
local repeaters and always found a FD group to operate with. (CW operators are 
always welcome)

Steve .. AI7W


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Rock
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 19:32 UTC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon


Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW operator to join 
them for Field Day?  
   Kevin.  KD5ONS
__
QRP-L mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
QRP-L mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Elecraft] RE: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread Kevin Rock
I am trying to find a group where CW is not shunned.  The two nearby groups 
treat me like I am a leper when I mention the mode.  Often it is the end of any 
conversation.  

I am not sure where the myth of CW operators are always welcome got started 
because it is not true here.

I will contact the people in Eugene but it is about three hours away from me 
due to rivers and mountains.
   Kevin.  KD5ONS

 

-Original Message-
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 12, 2007 9:51 PM
To: 'Kevin Rock' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

I'm not sure where you mean by N.W. Oregon but the Valley Radio Club of Eugene 
will have an operation. 
If you're interested just ask on the 146.72 (W7PXL) repeater.

Whenever I've been on the road over field day, I've just asked around on the 
local repeaters and always found a FD group to operate with. (CW operators are 
always welcome)

Steve .. AI7W


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Rock
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 19:32 UTC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon


Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW operator to join 
them for Field Day?  
   Kevin.  KD5ONS
__
QRP-L mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
QRP-L mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RE: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread Dan KB6NU

They obviously feel threatened by a ham with superior skills. :)

The animosity exhibited even by some old-timers when the topic of CW  
comes up is amazing to me, especially in the context of  contest.  
Don't they realize that, in most contests, you get more points for CW  
contacts than for phone contacts?


73!

Dan KB6NU
--
CW Geek and MI Affiliated Club Coordinator
Read my ham radio blog at www.kb6nu.com
LET'S GET MORE KIDS INTO HAM RADIO!



On Jun 12, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Kevin Rock wrote:
I am trying to find a group where CW is not shunned.  The two  
nearby groups treat me like I am a leper when I mention the mode.   
Often it is the end of any conversation.


I am not sure where the myth of CW operators are always welcome  
got started because it is not true here.


I will contact the people in Eugene but it is about three hours  
away from me due to rivers and mountains.

   Kevin.  KD5ONS


-Original Message-

From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 12, 2007 9:51 PM
To: 'Kevin Rock' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
elecraft@mailman.qth.net

Subject: RE: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

I'm not sure where you mean by N.W. Oregon but the Valley Radio  
Club of Eugene will have an operation.

If you're interested just ask on the 146.72 (W7PXL) repeater.

Whenever I've been on the road over field day, I've just asked  
around on the local repeaters and always found a FD group to  
operate with. (CW operators are always welcome)


Steve .. AI7W


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Rock
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 19:32 UTC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [QRP-L] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon


Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW  
operator to join them for Field Day?

  Kevin.  KD5ONS
__

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

2007-06-12 Thread Kevin Rock
This is another fantasy of mine.  Form a club of CW operators who like to 
operate in the boonies and actually build their own rigs.  Glory be I think 
that may draw a few fine souls.  Maybe even a glowbug or two :)
   Kevin.  KD5ONS

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 12, 2007 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW Field Day operations in Northwest Oregon

In a message dated 6/12/07 3:41:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Are there any groups in Northwest Oregon who would like a CW operator to 
 join them for Field Day?  
 

If there aren't, why not start your own? That's what I did many years ago, 
when I got fed up with the local clubs' approach to FD.

Doesn't have to be a formal club, just a Field Day group. 

73 de Jim, N2EY

Grand Poobah, Jug Southgate's Bunch


**
 See 
what's free at http://www.aol.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread Fred (FL)
In a battle war situation - the last thing a
operator military person needs to have to do,
is dial in an exact frequency. I suspect this
was one reason for crystal control.  Also in
secure comms nets - periodic crystal changes,
would make code book syncing net frequency very
practical and reliable.  By definition, in
the military, all radio operators - where
war fighters first.

Does anyone remember Gabriel Heater?  When I
was a kid, out at my grandparents cottage south
of Buffalo - everyone used to sit around the
Philco radio - and listen to Gabriel Heater's
news program, at that time about WWII.  
. and all the ship's at sea.

73, de Fred N3CSY
...just got a TH-F6A toy, should keep me busy,
till K3 arrives :) 


 

TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread Stuart Rohre

Hi Fred,
Yes, I remember Gabriel Heater news; but the all the ships at sea was the 
tag line of gossip commentator Walter Winchell.  Remember him?  He also had 
the snappy code burst at the start of his broadcasts.


Can you believe, Andy Rooney of CBS 60 minutes was a reporter for Stars 
and Stripes newspaper in WW2?


73,
Stuart
K5KVH 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting ready to order K2

2007-06-12 Thread Brian Lloyd

On Jun 12, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

As a member and supporter of the ARRL since 1952 I don't beat up  
on them
too easily. Considering the fact that many if not most Hams today  
would not
consider picking up a soldering iron to do more than attach a  
connector to a
cable, I agree they are probably being cautious. After all, I  
understand the
ARRL has launched their own program of technical courses to help  
Hams become

more technically competent.


They are putting me through a one-week intensive training program to  
help me integrate their recommended lesson plans into my syllabus.  
They are also training us on the Parallax Boe-Bot robot kits. I am  
going to get several of those too. The kids get to build those as  
well and it introduces them to programming. Again, the hands-on  
aspect of writing a program that then causes the robot to behave a  
certain way in the physical world should be another reinforcing  
learning tool.


The comparison is striking: when I was in the 6th grade our class  
built
crystal sets as part of science. I already had a three-tube  
regenerative

receiver so I got an A without breaking a sweat G.


We didn't even do that in our classes. I am going to show kids how  
much fun making things can be.


Oh, and I have to get T-hunting and emergency communications in there  
too. I want to make sure there is something for everyone.


73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread Fred Jensen

Stuart Rohre wrote:

Hi Fred,
Yes, I remember Gabriel Heater news; but the all the ships at sea was 
the tag line of gossip commentator Walter Winchell.  Remember him?  He 
also had the snappy code burst at the start of his broadcasts.


Can you believe, Andy Rooney of CBS 60 minutes was a reporter for 
Stars and Stripes newspaper in WW2?


Andy Rooney reported in the SS during our Vietnam adventure too.  I 
remember his sort of opening line, Ever thought about ...  When I'm in 
a CW contest, or we're in my truck and the repeater IDs, my wife will 
often say, and all the ships at sea.  She was born in 1945, and likely 
never heard Walter and I'm sure not Gabriel.  Some things do stick 
around however, I'm told it's our culture.  Often wondered what Walter 
sent, I do remember hearing it, didn't know the code then.


Really cool Eric/Wayne K3 show last night at the NCCC meeting in San 
Carlos CA.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Crystal Clear book

2007-06-12 Thread Phil Kane
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT), Fred (FL) wrote:

Does anyone remember Gabriel Heater?  When I
was a kid, out at my grandparents cottage south
of Buffalo - everyone used to sit around the
Philco radio - and listen to Gabriel Heater's
news program, at that time about WWII.
. and all the ship's at sea.

  That was Walter Windshield (Winchell...g) :

 Good evening Mister and Missus North and South America and
 all the ships at sea, let's go to press...

  Gabriel Heatters's trademark was Ah yes, there's good news
  tonight...

  Or so I remember.
--
   73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
   Elecraft K2/100   s/n 5402



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] flagrantly OT: name of WWII comedian who ...could teach Morse code to a dog....?

2007-06-12 Thread wayne burdick
I heard this very funny piece on NPR a couple of years ago about a 
40's-era comedian who did skits about military life. In one skit he 
played a radio-class instructor disgusted with a new class of 
underachieving recruits who were there to learn the code. He chastised 
them for not studying while bragging that he could teach anyone the 
code, even a dog, which cracked up the studio audience (or, I'm not 
sure which, prompted the laugh-track operator to open it up all the 
way).


Being not quite 50, I wasn't there. I bet a few of you were  :)  I 
couldn't find his name with a web search. Anyone have a clue?


tnx
Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] memories

2007-06-12 Thread Charles Harpole
At one time, Mosley offered a semi-automated rotor control box.  It 
announced in spoken English.


When u pushed an execute command button it spoke the one word GO
Repeated pushings produced Go, go go go go... etc.

Wonderful way to psych self up at beginning of contest?

Charles Harpole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
PC Magazine’s 2007 editors’ choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows 
Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-usocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com