[FairfieldLife] Re: Favorite movies to watch in Sat Yuga

2006-04-15 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 t3rinity wrote:

 Here's a very inexpert and indiscriminate list of temporary favorates
 by me:
 
 Hero
 
 Stargate
 
 Matrix I
 
 Mulholland Drive (yes, really I liked it!)
 
 Devdas (Bollywood with Aishwarya Rai)
 
 Veer and Zara
 
 Meera (with MS Subbulakshmi, something I'd love to see but couldn't
 yet get hold on)
 
 
   
 
 Meera should be available at your local Indian grocery on DVD.  Oh
don't 
 have a local Indian grocery?  There are several Indian online rental 
 places and Netflix does have some Indian movies to so you might
check there.

I checked Netflix and they don't have it. I am not even certain that
there is a DVD of the film, as it was done 1947 and 1945
http://tinyurl.com/ejkcr
see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.S._Subbulakshmi

'Mahatma Gandhi was so charmed of her Meera bhajans that he requested
her to sing the song Hari Tum haro Jan ki bheer (Lord, please dispel
the fear in mankind). She regretfully declined as she had a cold that
day. A prompt reply came back from the mahatma's side saying I would
gladly hear subbulakshmi speak it than hear it sung by others.'






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
  jpgillam@ 
wrote:
  snip
 Apparently one big reason the U.S. is coming down so 
 hard on Iran is that if we don't do it, Israel will, and 
then 
 the world of Islam will *really* be pissed.

Except that I've been reading that Israel doesn't think
Iran is that much of a threat to it.
   
   Where did you read that - Al Jazeera dot com?
  
  Uh, no, a post by Steve Clemons on TPM Cafe.  See
  some quotes and a link at the end of this post.
  
  Not sure why you'd think that would be an Al Jazeera
  position.  Seems to me the Al Jazeera position would
  be exactly the opposite.
  
  The context was criticism of the administration's
  fear-mongering, as opposed to Israel's purportedly more
  sensible perspective.  That Israel is likely to attack
  Iran, so we need to do it first, is a talking point of
  Bush's supporters, so of course it has been given great
  prominence in the mainstream media.
  
   On 7 September 1997, the CBS newsmagazine Sixty Minutes 
broadcast 
   an alarming story in which former Russian National Security 
Adviser
   Aleksandr Lebed claimed that the Russian military had lost 
track of
   more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear bombs, any one of which 
could
   kill up to 100,000 people.
   
   http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html
  
  And the relevance of this to Israel's position on Iran's
  nuclear capabilities is what, exactly?
 
 The relevance is to your un-informed, biased, wish-full,
 a-naivite-that-will-get-everyone-killed position.

Actually that was Steve Clemons's position (you know,
the post I quoted from that you weren't able to comment
on and snipped).

 A hundred nuclear suitcases on the loose (at least); an Iran that is
 threatning the extinction of another state whilst purportedly not
 yet having the Bomb.

And this is why we should bomb Iran's nuclear facilities,
to keep Iran from obtaining and using one of these nuclear
suitcases that's floating around?  I'm not sure how that
would work, exactly.  In fact, I should think it might
*inspire* Iran to get hold of a few nuclear suitcases.

Or are you advocating wiping the country out entirely?

Just how many countries would you like to wipe out in
order to feel safe from nuclear suitcases?  Remember,
we'd probably need to get rid of Great Britain and a
whole lot of other nations where terrorists are known
to live.

 Are you this stupid or is this some sort of game your playing..?

Funny, I was going to ask the same of you.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
  jpgillam@ 
wrote:
  snip
 Apparently one big reason the U.S. is coming down so 
 hard on Iran is that if we don't do it, Israel will, and then 
 the world of Islam will *really* be pissed.

Except that I've been reading that Israel doesn't think
Iran is that much of a threat to it.
   
   Where did you read that - Al Jazeera dot com?
  
  Uh, no, a post by Steve Clemons on TPM Cafe.  See
  some quotes and a link at the end of this post.
  
  Not sure why you'd think that would be an Al Jazeera
  position.  Seems to me the Al Jazeera position would
  be exactly the opposite.
  
  The context was criticism of the administration's
  fear-mongering, as opposed to Israel's purportedly more
  sensible perspective.  That Israel is likely to attack
  Iran, so we need to do it first, is a talking point of
  Bush's supporters, so of course it has been given great
  prominence in the mainstream media.
  
   On 7 September 1997, the CBS newsmagazine Sixty Minutes broadcast 
   an alarming story in which former Russian National Security Adviser
   Aleksandr Lebed claimed that the Russian military had lost track of
   more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear bombs, any one of which could
   kill up to 100,000 people.
   
   http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html
  
  And the relevance of this to Israel's position on Iran's
  nuclear capabilities is what, exactly?
 
 The relevance is to your un-informed, biased, wish-full,
 a-naivite-that-will-get-everyone-killed position.
 
 A hundred nuclear suitcases on the loose (at least); an Iran that is
 threatning the extinction of another state whilst purportedly not yet
 having the Bomb.
 
 Are you this stupid or is this some sort of game your playing..?


Just as well the missing suitcase bombs are a myth, the USSR did have
some portable nuclear devices but they were all accounted for when
dismantled at the end of the cold war.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anonyff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
 ignore me.
 

Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the worst
behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about equal to
to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.






  The basic issue is the
  caste system. The original article just DEVASTATED
  the concept of the caste system, rather effectively.
  
  So what happened?  A few people tried (successfully)
  to DIVERT attention away from the real subject of
  the parody -- the caste system and its indefensible
  evils -- and get people to focus on whether the
  style of the humor was socially acceptable.
 
 Or: That we all think the caste system is indefensible
 is a given, no debate necessary.
 
  As far as I can tell, these attempts WORKED.  In the
  posts that I can see, only Shemp kept trying to come
  back to the real subject -- the caste system and how 
  much of an affront to humanity it is.
 
 Anybody here *not* agree that the caste system is an
 affront to humanity?  If so, I'll be *delighted* to
 debate them on that point.
 
  Other folks
  got lured into the DIVERSION, and got lured into 
  arguing with people who were (essentially) trying 
  to dictate to them what is permissible as humor and 
  what is not.
 
 See, TMers (particularly me), according to Barry, are
 not allowed to express a personal opinion on ANYTHING.
 If they do, they are ipso facto attempting to dictate
 to others whatever that opinion advocates.
 
  Lesson to be learned from all this:  whenever someone
  reacts to a joke by trying to say that the humor in
  the joke is politically incorrect or racist or 
  demeaning, LOOK CLOSER.
 
 Right, it actually may *be* racist or demeaning.
 
  Chances are that this is a tactic, a DISTRACTION, 
  meant to divert attention from the thing that the 
  joke made people laugh at, and see a new side of.
 
 No, Barry, sorry, but you're once again taking your
 own bilious paranoid fantasies for reality.
 
 
 
  
  Kudos to Shemp for being the only one to be able
  to stick to the subject...
 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Will Barry and Judy please stop this infantile behavior

2006-04-15 Thread anonyff
Maybe infantile is being to kind to you both.

Your constant nipping at each other in this public venue is the most
immature behavior I have ever seen between adults. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
Care to the ways they are doing that, beyond opinion.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Of course they do, it's just a caste system by another name.  And the 
 lunatics running things now are trying their hardest to make it as 
 permanent as possible.
 
 Sal
 
 
 On Apr 15, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Vaj wrote:
 
  In a materialistic and hedonistic society do we abandon certain 
  caste-functions because of attachment to and worship of materialism 
  and hedonism? Do the wealthiest classes in America constitute a 
  faux-Brahman caste? 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Maharishi: When someone dies ...

2006-04-15 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Maharishi: When someone dies ...





From the program for the passing of Billy Dunn:

When someone dies, it is because at that point, their karma has become insurmountable in the present body. It is not possible to understand why death had to come when it did and there is certainly no point in assuming responsibility and guilt. The course of action was unfathomable. However, especialy for someone on the path of speedy evolution, the transition is purely evolutionary. They go to the celestial realms, or are reborn almost immediately.

When life leaves the body, it is the breath leaving, like transcending. For one who has been accustomed to this experience for many years, the transiktion is easy, painless and blissful, not catastrophic. Dropping the body is like letting a bird out of its cage. 

Grief is natural. At first when grief is deep and sharp, these emotions of the family and friends allow the soul to feel that they were loved very deeply. It is also natural that the grieving should taper off, allowing the soul to feel that its passing was not a drag of the life of its beloved ones, and that they are free to move onto their destiny. It is important to feel positivity and support for the departed soul wherever they be, because our attitude affects their evolution.

Maharishi






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











[FairfieldLife] All Community meeting today 1:30 p.m. Dome

2006-04-15 Thread george_deforest

did anyone from fairfield-life attend this,
or hear anything about it?

i am curius what the news from kansas is!?


- Original Message - 
From: Maureen Wynne 
To: Recipient List Suppressed: 
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 8:48 AM
Subject: All Community meeting today 1:30 p.m. Dome

Everyone is invited to an all-community meeting today, Saturday, 
April 15 with His Excellency Dr. Bevan Morris, His Excellency Dr. 
John Hagelin, His Excellency Dr. Eike Hartmann, and the Rajas who 
have just traveled here from the Brahmasthan of the United States.

It will be held in the Maharishi Patanjali Golden Dome and will run 
from 1:30 to 3:00 pm. They will be sharing all the latest news and 
knowledge.

Everyone is welcome and no badges are required.

--





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Sam Harris - the mortal dangers of Religion

2006-04-15 Thread quantum packet



Note: forwarded message attached.
		New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  







---BeginMessage---
Part two of my Point of Inquiry Podcast is available here:

http://www.pointofinquiry.org/

Best,
Sam

www.samharris.org


--
If you'd like to unsubscribe, please reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in 
the subject line.
---End Message---


[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Did anyone else notice the relevance to the current issues of  
 immigration in the US (and elsewhere)?
 
 What caste-roles do illegal Mexican immigrants primarily fulfill?
 
 In a materialistic and hedonistic society do we abandon certain caste- 
 functions because of attachment to and worship of materialism and  
 hedonism? Do the wealthiest classes in America constitute a faux- 
 Brahman caste?

It appears to me that an inherent presmption in a number of posts is
that sudras are a low and undesirable class, and to be a Brahman is
the best, and the desire and goal of all should be to rise above (to a
higher) their current caste. I thnk that is a limited, warped and even
upside down view.

First, no need to use the social and occupational classes of ancient
india. Not much call for charriot spoke makers, or arrow makers in 
current society. In the modern west we have various clusters of
occupations-- and often a social culture that develops around it [some
cliche yet indicative examples in brackets]. For example:

Blue Collar -- works with hands [country music ethos, pick-up trucks,
Nascar, hunting fishing, budweiser, meth]

White Collar (particularly business / trade related)  -- works with
social/people skills,common sense and business skills, [easy listening
music, Lexus, golf and tennis, chardonay, single malt scotches] 
  
Intellectuals (college professors, journalists, doctors, lawyers, etc)
[classical music, hyrid cars/volvo station wagons, hiking, skiing,
imported beers, obscure wines, pot]

Artists (actors, musicians, writers, artists, etc)[new wave, punk,
modern rock, world music, sports cars, modern dance, yoga, running in
the wilderness ecstasy, hallucinogens, tequilla]


Is one strata superior to the other? Do members in one class seek to
be in another? For the most part no. For example, a lot of country
music is about blue collar pride and why no person with their feet on
the ground would ever want to be a shallow yuppie (aka white collar,
or air head -- intellectual).

More so, an important transition is underway in which the work of
Intellectuals, White-collar and artists can be digitized andand
commoditized to a degree in global markets -- driving down wages. And
similar processes occur in some but not all blue-collar jobs via
transfer of jobs (assembly,etc,) overseas. But some jobs can't be
digitized nor transferred overseas: many traditional blue collar
hands on jobs. Cooks, housekeepers, gardeners, masseuses, etc. 
these jobs might become higher paying and thus prestigious than
traditional prestige jobs of Intellectuals, White Collar workers and
even some artists.

Thus, the jobs that mexican illegals do may become much more sought
after and prestigious. Classifying them as sudra and lowly jobs is
error prone on two fronts: it presumes i) a rank order to castes or
occupational stratas, and ii) that there is no long-run change to
compensation and prestige for different types of jobs as markets
continue to globalize.









 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi: When someone dies ...

2006-04-15 Thread shempmcgurk
What a terrific thing to include in a funeral progarm.

Thanks for reproducing it, Rick.

Questions:

1) Who is Billy Dunn (sounds like a prizefighter's name!)?

2) Do you know what the original source for MMY's words are?






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From the program for the passing of Billy Dunn:
 
 When someone dies, it is because at that point, their karma has 
become
 insurmountable in the present body.  It is not possible to 
understand why
 death had to come when it did and there is certainly no point in 
assuming
 responsibility and guilt.  The course of action was unfathomable.  
However,
 especialy for someone on the path of speedy evolution, the 
transition is
 purely evolutionary.  They go to the celestial realms, or are 
reborn almost
 immediately.
 
 When life leaves the body, it is the breath leaving, like 
transcending.
 For one who has been accustomed to this experience for many years, 
the
 transiktion is easy, painless and blissful, not catastrophic.  
Dropping the
 body is like letting a bird out of its cage.
 
 Grief is natural.  At first when grief is deep and sharp, these 
emotions of
 the family and friends allow the soul to feel that they were loved 
very
 deeply.  It is also natural that the grieving should taper off, 
allowing the
 soul to feel that its passing was not a drag of the life of its 
beloved
 ones, and that they are free to move onto their destiny.  It is 
important to
 feel positivity and support for the departed soul wherever they 
be, because
 our attitude affects their evolution.
 
 Maharishi








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] All Community meeting today 1:30 p.m. Dome

2006-04-15 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Apr 15, 2006, at 5:06 PM, george_deforest wrote:

 did anyone from fairfield-life attend this,
 or hear anything about it?

 i am curius what the news from kansas is!?

Dorothy and Toto just realized they weren't there anymore.

Sal





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 Based on working with him directly for fourteen 
 years, and on watching his predictions and
 proclamations in the decades since then, I 
 would probably bet anything -- much less the
 world -- that if Maharishi says that X is true,
 it isn't.  

14 years working with him directly... Let's see, that would mean that 
you were working for the TMO at the highest levels from 19xx to 
19xx+14. Just when did you learn TM and when did you become part of the 
inner circle and when did you leave?

 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Research, Ethics and the Good Head

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Apr 15, 2006, at 9:45 AM, sparaig wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
  
   On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:13 PM, sparaig wrote:
  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:

 Hiya:

 I recently received this from the Shamatha Project, which  
  will be a
 rather sophisticated look at 'transcendence style 
meditation'  
  using
 all the methodologies in current brain research. You also  
  might be
 interested in the Neuroscientists who are spearheading the  
  Mind and
 Life Project:

 http://www.investigatingthemind.org/

   
Of course, there's no evidence that transcendence style  
  meditation
has anything to do with TM.
  
   TM *is* a basic form of Shamatha (transcendence style 
meditation)
   using a mantra. There are hundreds of different types of of  
  shamatha.
  
 
  That might be, but the site I quoted seemed to almost get TM 
and  
  then wandered off into
  the ozone. It will be interesting to see if the physiological  
  changes are the same for
  whatever transcendence style meditation technique they test.
 
 I suggest you read The Buddhist Tradition of Samatha: Methods for  
 Refining and Examining Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness  
 Studies, 6, No. 2-3, 1999. pp. 175-187. It is available at:
 
 http://alanwallace.org/Wallace-Samatha.pdf
 
 You'll see the model of meditation does go quite a bit deeper and  
 further, so one would expect the results will be different.


Funny, I was just thinking, as I read it, that it doesn't go very 
deep at all, so one would expect the results to be different...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Will Barry and Judy please stop this infantile behavior

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Maybe infantile is being to kind to you both.
 
 Your constant nipping at each other in this public venue is the most
 immature behavior I have ever seen between adults.


Lucky you.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
  ignore me.
 
 Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the worst
 behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about equal
 to to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.

And once again you're yelling at me rather than
Barry, when he chose to start sniping at me.

Don't you guys get a little *embarrassed* after
a while at how you inevitably pick on me instead
of him?

I mean, if you switched off, that would be one
thing.  But you don't seem to have the guts to
*ever* chide Barry, even when he starts it (all
his high-minded vows notwithstanding).

Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
you do is chide us *equally*?






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Judy / Barry (was Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating)

2006-04-15 Thread anonyff
Sorry, Judy, I didn't mean to make it so one sided.

HEY BARRY, WILL YOU STOP SNIPING AT JUDY.

I just thought that he was too dumb to get it. You seem way to smart
to keep at this kind of behavior.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
   ignore me.
  
  Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the worst
  behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about equal
  to to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.
 
 And once again you're yelling at me rather than
 Barry, when he chose to start sniping at me.
 
 Don't you guys get a little *embarrassed* after
 a while at how you inevitably pick on me instead
 of him?
 
 I mean, if you switched off, that would be one
 thing.  But you don't seem to have the guts to
 *ever* chide Barry, even when he starts it (all
 his high-minded vows notwithstanding).
 
 Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
 Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
 you do is chide us *equally*?








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
   ignore me.
  
  Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the worst
  behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about 
equal
  to to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.
 
 And once again you're yelling at me rather than
 Barry, when he chose to start sniping at me.
 
 Don't you guys get a little *embarrassed* after
 a while at how you inevitably pick on me instead
 of him?
 
 I mean, if you switched off, that would be one
 thing.  But you don't seem to have the guts to
 *ever* chide Barry, even when he starts it (all
 his high-minded vows notwithstanding).
 
 Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
 Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
 you do is chide us *equally*?


It's a good ole boys thing for some, I think. You're the uppity 
female, while Barry is, well, a guy...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Judy / Barry (was Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating)

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry, Judy, I didn't mean to make it so one sided.
 
 HEY BARRY, WILL YOU STOP SNIPING AT JUDY.
 
 I just thought that he was too dumb to get it. You seem way to smart
 to keep at this kind of behavior.
 


Actually Barry has indicated that he DOES get it --that he LIKES 
pushing Judy's buttons. He has said so litterally. He dispises her so 
much that he gets off on making her react.

 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
 wrote:

[snip]


http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html
   
   And the relevance of this to Israel's position on Iran's
   nuclear capabilities is what, exactly?
  
  The relevance is to your un-informed, biased, wish-full,
  a-naivite-that-will-get-everyone-killed position.
 
 Actually that was Steve Clemons's position (you know,
 the post I quoted from that you weren't able to comment
 on and snipped).

Lady, who are you kiddin..? 

:-)

  A hundred nuclear suitcases on the loose (at least); an Iran that is
  threatning the extinction of another state whilst purportedly not
  yet having the Bomb.
 
 And this is why we should bomb Iran's nuclear facilities,
 to keep Iran from obtaining and using one of these nuclear
 suitcases that's floating around?  I'm not sure how that
 would work, exactly.  In fact, I should think it might
 *inspire* Iran to get hold of a few nuclear suitcases.
 
 Or are you advocating wiping the country out entirely?
 
 Just how many countries would you like to wipe out in
 order to feel safe from nuclear suitcases?  Remember,
 we'd probably need to get rid of Great Britain and a
 whole lot of other nations where terrorists are known
 to live.

You're a fuckin' nutcase. Why bother to reply to people's postings
when you don't bother readoing what they say?
 
  Are you this stupid or is this some sort of game your playing..?
 
 Funny, I was going to ask the same of you.

You were not.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Judy / Barry (was Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating)

2006-04-15 Thread anonyff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
 
  Sorry, Judy, I didn't mean to make it so one sided.
  
  HEY BARRY, WILL YOU STOP SNIPING AT JUDY.
  
  I just thought that he was too dumb to get it. You seem way to smart
  to keep at this kind of behavior.
  
 
 
 Actually Barry has indicated that he DOES get it --that he LIKES 
 pushing Judy's buttons. He has said so litterally. He dispises her so 
 much that he gets off on making her react.
 

And, Judy must enjoy reacting or she would have done what we tell kids
to do from the time we hear them taunting each other-ignore the other
person. 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:

is towed behind Air India jetliners in a giant burlap 
 sack.
   
   Does this strike anybody as just a wee bit racist?
  
  
  Is Hindu a race?
 
 Indian Hindus are generally brown people.

Hence the name Caucasian...
   
   Non sequitur.
  
  +++  Brown is a new race?  Looks like a double non seequiter.  N.
 
 Oh, please.  You can't be *ignorant* of the racism
 against Indians, can you?

+++ Right,- racism everywhere, however,
Is hindu a race?
Indian Hindus are generally brown people.
Hence the name Caucasian
These few lines are a bit hard to follow.
The funny butts and drug scene was after my time so maybe that
or a little old timers syndrome is the problem.   N.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Will Barry and Judy please stop this infantile behavior

2006-04-15 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
 
  Maybe infantile is being to kind to you both.
  
  Your constant nipping at each other in this public venue is the 
most
  immature behavior I have ever seen between adults.
 

 
 Lucky you.


***

Well, Judy at least should behave better after her arrest yesterday:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/nyregion/16conduct.html







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
ignore me.
   
   Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the 
worst
   behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about 
 equal
   to to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.
  
  And once again you're yelling at me rather than
  Barry, when he chose to start sniping at me.
  
  Don't you guys get a little *embarrassed* after
  a while at how you inevitably pick on me instead
  of him?
  
  I mean, if you switched off, that would be one
  thing.  But you don't seem to have the guts to
  *ever* chide Barry, even when he starts it (all
  his high-minded vows notwithstanding).
  
  Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
  Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
  you do is chide us *equally*?
 
 It's a good ole boys thing for some, I think. You're the uppity 
 female, while Barry is, well, a guy...

I've wondered that myself.  But I think it's more
likely they just don't want to get on his bad side,
because they've seen what happens with you and me.

Anyway, this time the one-sidedness got remedied.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
  wrote:
 
 [snip]
 
 
 http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html

And the relevance of this to Israel's position on Iran's
nuclear capabilities is what, exactly?
   
   The relevance is to your un-informed, biased, wish-full,
   a-naivite-that-will-get-everyone-killed position.
  
  Actually that was Steve Clemons's position (you know,
  the post I quoted from that you weren't able to comment
  on and snipped).
 
 Lady, who are you kiddin..?

Oh, did I miss all your comments on the Clemons quote?
I didn't see any.
 
 
 :-)
 
   A hundred nuclear suitcases on the loose (at least); an Iran
   that is threatning the extinction of another state whilst 
   purportedly not yet having the Bomb.
  
  And this is why we should bomb Iran's nuclear facilities,
  to keep Iran from obtaining and using one of these nuclear
  suitcases that's floating around?  I'm not sure how that
  would work, exactly.  In fact, I should think it might
  *inspire* Iran to get hold of a few nuclear suitcases.
  
  Or are you advocating wiping the country out entirely?
  
  Just how many countries would you like to wipe out in
  order to feel safe from nuclear suitcases?  Remember,
  we'd probably need to get rid of Great Britain and a
  whole lot of other nations where terrorists are known
  to live.
 
 You're a fuckin' nutcase. Why bother to reply to people's postings
 when you don't bother readoing what they say?

Translation: She nailed me.  But I'll pretend
otherwise, 'cause I ain't got no answer.

   Are you this stupid or is this some sort of game your playing..?
  
  Funny, I was going to ask the same of you.
 
 You were not.

Well, yeah, I was, actually.  You sure haven't
said anything sensible *yet*.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Will Barry and Judy please stop this infantile behavior

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
  
   Maybe infantile is being to kind to you both.
   
   Your constant nipping at each other in this public venue is the 
 most
   immature behavior I have ever seen between adults.
  
 
  
  Lucky you.
 
 
 ***
 
 Well, Judy at least should behave better after her arrest yesterday:
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/nyregion/16conduct.html

I never liked Shea Stadium anyway.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Judy / Barry (was Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating)

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sorry, Judy, I didn't mean to make it so one sided.
 
 HEY BARRY, WILL YOU STOP SNIPING AT JUDY.

Thank you.

 I just thought that he was too dumb to get it. You seem way to smart
 to keep at this kind of behavior.

You know, I'm not the only person here who realizes
Barry's a phony.  I'm just the only one who calls
him on it frequently.  If the rest of you would do
your part, I wouldn't feel the need to.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
  no_reply@ wrote.
 snipp, 
  So what's YOUR feeling about the caste system, eh?
  Is there ANY validity to it, or is it just another
  way that the current ruling elite of a nation finds 
  a way to make sure that their children rule after 
  them and that the currently-powerless are *kept* 
  powerless?  
  
  I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
  ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
  with to support the caste system.  But that's just
  me...if you believe differently, and think that 
  the caste system makes sense, please present the 
  reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.
 
+++ With most of the people involved believing in reincarnation,
wouldnt the issue be almost a moot point?
Your choice-your caste- your problem, or lack of.  N.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff anonyff@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
ignore me.
   
   Who gives a shit, can't you JUST STOP SNIPING?   This is the 
worst
   behavior from an adult I believe I have ever seen. It's about 
 equal
   to to little kids who just can't stop no matter what.
  
  And once again you're yelling at me rather than
  Barry, when he chose to start sniping at me.
  
  Don't you guys get a little *embarrassed* after
  a while at how you inevitably pick on me instead
  of him?
  
  I mean, if you switched off, that would be one
  thing.  But you don't seem to have the guts to
  *ever* chide Barry, even when he starts it (all
  his high-minded vows notwithstanding).
  
  Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
  Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
  you do is chide us *equally*?
 
 
 It's a good ole boys thing for some, I think. You're the uppity 
 female, while Barry is, well, a guy...

I just figured you both enjoy it, or get some satisfaction from it  
on some level. Like Dr. Phil of TV fame asks, 'what's the pay-off, 
what's in it for you?'-- So, what the hell, enjoy itIf you 
didn't, one or both would stop it 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The four castes in Rgveda

2006-04-15 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 According to A.A.Macdonell, the only mention of the 
 four castes in the Rgveda is in puruSa-suukta (X 90, 12):
 
 saMhitaa-paaTha (reading with sandhi)
 
 braahmaNo 'sya mukham aasiid
 baahuu raajaniaH kRtaH;
 uuruu tad asya yad vaishyaH;
 padbhyaaM shuudro ajaayata.
 
 pada-paaTha (without sandhi):
 
 braahmaNaH | asya | mukham | aasiit |
 baahuu iti | raajanyaH | kRtaH |
 uuruu iti | tat | asya | yat | vaishyaH |
 pat 'bhyaam | shuudraH | ajaayata | 
 
 
 His [puruSa's] mouth was the Braahman,
 his two arms were made the warrior,
 his two thighs the Vaishya; from 
 his two feet the Shuudra was born.

+++ I recall seeing nearly the same thing in the Aquarian Gospell
and, Jesus taking issue with it.   N.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread Rick Archer
on 4/15/06 6:49 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
 Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
 you do is chide us *equally*?

This idiotic feud will end whenever either of you decides not to participate
in it any more. Apparently, neither of you is capable of this. If either of
you were living fully in the present, you wouldn't harbor past grudges and
the situation wouldn't continue.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 on 4/15/06 6:49 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Does he really intimidate you folks that badly?
  Are you so afraid of him jumping on you if all
  you do is chide us *equally*?
 
 This idiotic feud will end whenever either of you decides not to 
participate
 in it any more. Apparently, neither of you is capable of this. If 
either of
 you were living fully in the present, you wouldn't harbor past 
grudges and
 the situation wouldn't continue.

It really amazes me that you, Rick, and so many
other intelligent people on this forum can't see
what's actually going on here right under your
noses.

No wonder Bush is president and the Republicans
control Congress.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- shempmcgurk wrote:
  
  The DL's turn the other cheek philosophy of non-violence 
  led to a horrible bit of ultra-violence, as Little Alex 
  would say, didn't it?
 
 It's as if the Dalai Lama recognized that his people 
 could not really be killed. That life cannot really be 
 taken. Like what some spiritual masters would have 
 us believe.
 
 Or, speaking practically, as if Tibet didn't have 
 a chance standing up against China, so why embrace 
 the karma of killing?

Both, I think. Plus, he knew that Tibet had almost
no army with which to defend itself from one of the
largest armies on the planet, and no resources with
which to develop, arm, and train one.  He *asked*
for help -- very vocally -- from almost all the
nations he thought might be interested in helping
his nation stand up to the Chinese.  All of them,
including America, ignored his pleas completely.

China had been trying to take over Tibet for many
years. The Dalai Lama we are speaking about is the
Fourteenth, but the Chinese tried to invade Tibet
back in the reign of the Sixth Dalai Lama, and
actually assassinated him.  It was an inevitability
that if China really wanted Tibet, they could have 
it at any time they wanted.

Another factor to consider at that time was the
importance placed in Tibetan society on prophecy
and the ability of the State Oracle to see the
future accurately.  The Oracle in this case saw
the end of Tibet as its people had known it, and
no possibility of stopping it.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Congratulations to invincible Holland

2006-04-15 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
 
   
  In a message dated 4/14/06 4:54:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
  salsunshine@ writes:
  
  I guess  it all comes down to what you consider 'wrong,' then:
  
  Genghis Khan--65  years
  
  Adolph Hitler--56 years
  
  Henry VIII--56 years
  
  Joseph  Stalin--75 years
  
  Benito Mussolini--62 years
  
  Franciso Franco--83  years
  
  Ferdinand Marcos--72 years
  
  Pol Pot--73 years
  
  And  I'm sure others can come up with  more people who did a 
whole 
 lot 
  of  wrong and lived a long time.
  
  
  
  
  wasn't it Billy Joel that sang only the good die  young?
 
 
 *
 
 Short life does not necessarily mean an evil person -- Shankara, 
for 
 example, only lived 32 years

According to S(h)ankara-dig-vijaya by Maadhava-vidyaaraNya
He transformed Himself into His real form as the great Lord
S(h)iva and attained to His Divine Abode S(h)ivaloka in the 
heaven of Kaila(:)sa on(?) His vehicle, the divine Bull Nandi.


 
 http://tinyurl.com/kaf69
 
 However, the principle is that a person who lives wrong simply 
 cannot live long. The fact is that in the Kaliyuga, nearly 
everybody 
 lives very wrong, so lifespan is short -- and since Kaliyuga is a 
 time of wrongdoing, it's weak and short-lived, and can be 
euthanized 
 even quicker than its natural 432K years, if a wave of spiritual 
 regeneration takes place.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
   You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and 
   a tooth for a tooth. But I say to you, Do not resist one 
   who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, 
   turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you 
   and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and 
   if any one forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
   
   Matthew 5.38-41
  
  He doesn't say anything about letting yourself be truely harmed
  either. Cheek slaps, clothes and a little extra exercise might 
  not mean what everyone thinks it does... 
 
 Hey, I like that interpretation. Forbearance and forgiveness 
 only apply to slapping, the taking of clothing and forced 
 marches of one mile. In all other slights, Christians are 
 free to kick ass.
 
 Oh yeah, and to crucifiction. Jesus asked forgiveness of those
 who crucified him. Otherwise, somebody messes with you, 
 put him down.

LOL. Wonderful exchange, Patrick. Anyone can interpret
scripture any way they want to. But the bottom line of
almost all such interpretations is that it enables
people to say, See...God/Jesus/Mohammed/Krishna/Buddha/
whatever *ssid* that what *I* do is correct...so there!

Christians *re*interpret Christ because it's fuckin'
*inconvenient* to live life the way he said it should
be lived. Hindus *re*interpret their scriptures because
it's fuckin' *inconvenient* to live the way they say
live should be lived. Bunch of wimps, if you ask me.  :-)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just off the top of my head -- some comedy that possibly demean 
 some
 groups and stereotypes -- but does so in the context of so many
 mult-dimensional barbs aimed at many others that it is not bigoted
 (these are top of my head, hypotheses - not firm arguments ) 
 
 Jack (Will and Grace) [gays are queens]
 
 Pheobe (Friends) [blondes -- and women -- are ditzy]
 
 Gracie (Burns and Allen) [Women -- are ditzy]
 
 Tony (Taxi) [Italians are big, lunks with limited brains]
 
 Ross (Friends) [Jews are intellectual geeks]
 
 Latka (Taxi) [foreigners are dumb]
 
 Early Rachel (Friends) [Jewish suburban girls are princesses]
 
 All (South Park)[skewers most every one]
 
 Redd Foxx (Sanford and Sons ) [Blacks are uneducated, boisterous 
 and crude]
 
 Seinfeld (Jerry) [Jews are clever but whiny]
 
 Eddie Murphy   (48 Hours) [Blacks are uppity]
 
 Eddie Murphy (SNL Buckwheat) [Blacks are slow and dumb]
 
 All (Blazing Saddles) [So many demeaning characterizations -- 
 where
 to start .. Blacks are lazy and shiftless, WASPS are bumbling and
 corrupt, back woods hillbillies are stupid ...]
 
 HotLips, Hawkeye...  MASH [.]
 
 Ben Stiller (Meet the Fawkers,...) [Jews are .. , WASPs are ,
 Women are ..., Men are ... ]
 
 Eddie Murphy, (Bowfinger) [Blacks... ]
 
 Steve Martin (The Jerk) [Blacks,Whites ...]


I think the larger issue is that some people are 
AFRAID of the power of comedy to reveal truth.

Look at the basic issue being *ignored* in these 
discussions (or the parts of them I see as a 
result of killfiles). The basic issue is the
caste system. The original article just DEVASTATED
the concept of the caste system, rather effectively.

So what happened?  A few people tried (successfully)
to DIVERT attention away from the real subject of
the parody -- the caste system and its indefensible
evils -- and get people to focus on whether the
style of the humor was socially acceptable.  

As far as I can tell, these attempts WORKED.  In the
posts that I can see, only Shemp kept trying to come
back to the real subject -- the caste system and how 
much of an affront to humanity it is.  Other folks
got lured into the DIVERSION, and got lured into 
arguing with people who were (essentially) trying 
to dictate to them what is permissible as humor and 
what is not.

Lesson to be learned from all this:  whenever someone
reacts to a joke by trying to say that the humor in
the joke is politically incorrect or racist or 
demeaning, LOOK CLOSER.  

Chances are that this is a tactic, a DISTRACTION, 
meant to divert attention from the thing that the 
joke made people laugh at, and see a new side of.

Kudos to Shemp for being the only one to be able
to stick to the subject...








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and 
a tooth for a tooth. But I say to you, Do not resist one 
who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, 
turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you 
and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and 
if any one forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.

Matthew 5.38-41
   
   He doesn't say anything about letting yourself be truely harmed
   either. Cheek slaps, clothes and a little extra exercise might 
   not mean what everyone thinks it does... 
  
  Hey, I like that interpretation. Forbearance and forgiveness 
  only apply to slapping, the taking of clothing and forced 
  marches of one mile. In all other slights, Christians are 
  free to kick ass.
  
  Oh yeah, and to crucifiction. Jesus asked forgiveness of those
  who crucified him. Otherwise, somebody messes with you, 
  put him down.
 
 LOL. Wonderful exchange, Patrick. Anyone can interpret
 scripture any way they want to. But the bottom line of
 almost all such interpretations is that it enables
 people to say, See...God/Jesus/Mohammed/Krishna/Buddha/
 whatever *ssid* that what *I* do is correct...so there!
 
 Christians *re*interpret Christ because it's fuckin'
 *inconvenient* to live life the way he said it should
 be lived. Hindus *re*interpret their scriptures because
 it's fuckin' *inconvenient* to live the way they say
 live should be lived. Bunch of wimps, if you ask me.  :-)

Yeah, but those muslims are hanging in there: kill the infidel.
Inconvenient, but scriptural.

(of course some intellectual wimp ass whiners will say Mohommed 
meant infidels to refer to local enemies, not not muslims.) 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies - correction

2006-04-15 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- Gillam wrote:
 
  Jesus asked forgiveness of those
  who crucified him. 
 
 Should read, Jesus asked his Father to forgive the crucifiers.
 
 Of course, that may have been a specific instance, and not
universally applicable. Jesus could 
 be fickle.

Actually I was thinking about a story that Charlie told. It may have
been after he was stabbed. (I talked to him 3 days afterwords). Asking
Maharishi if he should defend himself if attacked or 'turn the other
cheek'. Maharishi's comment was defend yourself. 

  And the other thing was from the Course in Miracles about the
difference between forgivness on the level of content and action on
the level of form. Forgive in the heart and act natually on the level
of form. 

BTW, if that was an attack, I'll just turn the other check, it's only
email after all :-)  

JohnY







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- jyouells2000 wrote:
 
   You have heard that it was said, An eye for an eye and 
   a tooth for a tooth. But I say to you, Do not resist one 
   who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, 
   turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you 
   and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and 
   if any one forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
   
   Matthew 5.38-41
  
  He doesn't say anything about letting yourself be truely harmed
  either. Cheek slaps, clothes and a little extra exercise might not
  mean what everyone thinks it does... 
 
 Hey, I like that interpretation. Forbearance and forgiveness 
 only apply to slapping, the taking of clothing and forced 
 marches of one mile. In all other slights, Christians are 
 free to kick ass.
 
 Oh yeah, and to crucifiction. Jesus asked forgiveness of those
 who crucified him. Otherwise, somebody messes with you, 
 put him down.


Hey, I thought it was funny... 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
 I think the larger issue is that some people are 
 AFRAID of the power of comedy to reveal truth.
 
 Look at the basic issue being *ignored* in these 
 discussions (or the parts of them I see as a 
 result of killfiles). The basic issue is the 
 caste system. The original article just DEVASTATED
 the concept of the caste system, rather effectively.
 
 So what happened?  A few people tried (successfully)
 to DIVERT attention away from the real subject of
 the parody -- the caste system and its indefensible
 evils -- and get people to focus on whether the
 style of the humor was socially acceptable.  

Of course we are not bound to live our lives the way you think we
ought to. That it was an effective satire is obvious. Case close. 
That some other points of interst were raised, andpursued, doesn't
mean that everyone is quite as one dimensional as you appear in this post.
 
 As far as I can tell, these attempts WORKED.  

haha, thats a TELLING confession.

In the
 posts that I can see, only Shemp kept trying to come
 back to the real subject -- the caste system and how 
 much of an affront to humanity it is.  Other folks
 got lured into the DIVERSION,

oh yes, hook line and sinker. Totally disgusting isn't. Too bad we
can't stay one pointed to pursue the BIG hook you have been caught on
for apparently 10 yeas: bash judy.

 and got lured into 
 arguing with people who were (essentially) trying 
 to dictate to them what is permissible as humor and 
 what is not.

HAHAHA. Thank god they are not trying to tells us what is acceptable
topics of discussions are. Like you. That would be totally sick and
fucked-up.

 
 Lesson to be learned from all this:  whenever someone
 reacts to a joke by trying to say that the humor in
 the joke is politically incorrect or racist or 
 demeaning, LOOK CLOSER.  
 
 Chances are that this is a tactic, a DISTRACTION, 
 meant to divert attention from the thing that the 
 joke made people laugh at, and see a new side of.

You really do appear to have merde for brains on this topic. There is
a large class of humor  which is sick and destructive. For example
good ol' boy jokes about blacks, jews, women etc. Its quite one sided,
 not universal bashing depicting the human comedy -- a la John
Stewart and South Park -- but rather class elitism, using humor to
maintain racist and sexist stereotypes and rigid archaic class 
structures. 

The difference between the two are are clear on the outer edges, but
less clear on the inner sides that appear to approach  each other.
Clarifying the distinctions is useful. Except for the eternal
shit-for-brains, it appears.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies - correction

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
 wrote:
 
  --- Gillam wrote:
  
   Jesus asked forgiveness of those
   who crucified him. 
  
  Should read, Jesus asked his Father to forgive the crucifiers.
  
  Of course, that may have been a specific instance, and not
 universally applicable. Jesus could 
  be fickle.
 
 Actually I was thinking about a story that Charlie told. It may have
 been after he was stabbed. (I talked to him 3 days afterwords). Asking
 Maharishi if he should defend himself if attacked or 'turn the other
 cheek'. Maharishi's comment was defend yourself. 

Jesus, MMY, Jesus, MMY... hmmm its a tough call.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Great backgound music while working on your computer

2006-04-15 Thread shempmcgurk



http://tinyurl.com/fhj54





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 A key ally with an important voice in the debate is Israel, whose
leadership has warned for 
 years that it viewed any attempt by Iran to begin enriching uranium
as a point of no 
 return. I was told by several officials that the White House's
interest in preventing an Israeli 
 attack on a Muslim country, which would provoke a backlash across
the region, was a 
 factor in its decision to begin the current operational planning. In
a speech in Cleveland on 
 March 20th, President Bush depicted Ahmadinejad's hostility toward
Israel as a serious 
 threat. It's a threat to world peace. He added, I made it clear,
I'll make it clear again, that 
 we will use military might to protect our ally Israel.
 
 See http://tinyurl.com/hyfsf

The hypocrisy here makes me vomit, as if Israel are doing anyhting to
help world peace! There treatment of the palestinians is one of the
worst human rights abuses happening on earth. And Bush has given them
support in annexing even more land on the west bank thus guaranteeing
endless war.

The question is, would attacking Iran cause more trouble than letting
them have the Bomb? This whole situation will be a good test of MMY
prediction that we are on the brink of world peace due to the new
pundit project. I like predictions as they either come true, or they
don't...

Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Of course we are not bound to live our lives the way 
 you think we ought to. 

Nope. 

 That it [the Onion article] was an effective satire 
 [of the caste system] is obvious. Case closed.

Well, since I'm not bound to live my life the way you
think I should, I'll reopen it, in its own thread.  :-)

I honestly believe that a lot of folks here ARE
uncomfortable with the subject of the caste system
coming up on this forum. And I think that the reason 
they're uncomfortable with this is that Maharishi 
*clearly* believes in it and supports it, and they're 
*embarrassed* by the fact that he believes in it.

Only a couple of weeks ago, someone posted a long
quote of Maharishi's in which he not only supported
the concept of the caste system, but tried to
reinvent it and pretend that it was based on
Jyotish, not inheritance.  The subject sank like
a stone, with very few people even stepping up to the
plate to take a swing at it.  I noticed Ingegerd
(I think) taking a stand against the caste system, 
and I think that Shemp has consistently taken a
stand against it, but it didn't seem as if others 
wanted to deal with the subject much at all. Then,
a couple of weeks later, the subject comes up again,
this time in a parody article, and the response to 
it is a bunch of followup discussions that are basic-
ally arguments about the relative political correct-
ness of the parody's humor...nary a word on the 
subject of the parody itself.

I just find all the aversion fascinating, that's all.

So what's YOUR feeling about the caste system, eh?
Is there ANY validity to it, or is it just another
way that the current ruling elite of a nation finds 
a way to make sure that their children rule after 
them and that the currently-powerless are *kept* 
powerless?  

I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
with to support the caste system.  But that's just
me...if you believe differently, and think that 
the caste system makes sense, please present the 
reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
 wrote:
 
  A key ally with an important voice in the debate is Israel, whose
 leadership has warned for 
  years that it viewed any attempt by Iran to begin enriching 
uranium
 as a point of no 
  return. I was told by several officials that the White House's
 interest in preventing an Israeli 
  attack on a Muslim country, which would provoke a backlash across
 the region, was a 
  factor in its decision to begin the current operational planning. 
In
 a speech in Cleveland on 
  March 20th, President Bush depicted Ahmadinejad's hostility toward
 Israel as a serious 
  threat. It's a threat to world peace. He added, I made it clear,
 I'll make it clear again, that 
  we will use military might to protect our ally Israel.
  
  See http://tinyurl.com/hyfsf
 
 The hypocrisy here makes me vomit, as if Israel are doing anyhting 
to
 help world peace! There treatment of the palestinians is one of the
 worst human rights abuses happening on earth. And Bush has given 
them
 support in annexing even more land on the west bank thus 
guaranteeing
 endless war.
 
 The question is, would attacking Iran cause more trouble than 
letting
 them have the Bomb? This whole situation will be a good test of MMY
 prediction that we are on the brink of world peace due to the new
 pundit project. I like predictions as they either come true, or they
 don't...
 
 Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?


Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a failure...






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
 ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
 with to support the caste system.  But that's just
 me...if you believe differently, and think that 
 the caste system makes sense, please present the 
 reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.


Some kind of caste system will always exist, whether its meritocracy 
or based on your family ties or on your birth chart or on personal 
wealth or on *something*.

Usually, that *something* is several things combined, no matter what 
social conventions claim.


The caste system in India pre-British was somewhat different than it 
was during the British rule or post-British. WHich was better? How do 
you define better?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] The Zero Year Curse is over?

2006-04-15 Thread cardemaister

http://www.mysticaluniverse.com/index/Everest_Climbers/zyc/zyc.html






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Zero Year Curse is over?

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 http://www.mysticaluniverse.com/index/Everest_Climbers/zyc/zyc.html



Reagan, it appears, has broken the curse.

He had Sidhas in the family :-)

Baby-G junior?

http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/21/96/383/15835_Bush.html

http://www.prophecywatcher.com/bush.html





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 [...]
  I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
  ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
  with to support the caste system.  But that's just
  me...if you believe differently, and think that 
  the caste system makes sense, please present the 
  reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.
 
 Some kind of caste system will always exist, whether its 
 meritocracy or based on your family ties or on your birth 
 chart or on personal wealth or on *something*.
 
 Usually, that *something* is several things combined, no 
 matter what social conventions claim.
 
 The caste system in India pre-British was somewhat different 
 than it was during the British rule or post-British. WHich 
 was better? How do you define better?

Interesting, but I couldn't help but notice that you
didn't really answer the question.  You tried to divert
the subject into nitpicking about the caste system itself.

So, once more -- do YOU personally believe that the 
Indian caste system is a good system, and a valid one?  
(You can have a different answer for pre-British rule 
and post-British rule if you'd like.)

If you believe it *is* a good system, and based on
valid principles, please explain what you think those
principles are.  Thanks.

P.S. I'm not picking on you personally here, Lawson.
I'm just pointing out what happens a *LOT* when 
someone asks people to express an opinion on a 
subject on which Maharishi's opinion is controversial.
All too often, they hem and haw and hedge their bets
and *fail* to say what *they* believe one way or
another.  I think it's a wimpy-assed thing to do, 
is all.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
 
 
  Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?
 
 
 Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a failure...



Absolutely, looks like we'll have to wait and see...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
  richardhughes103@ wrote:
  
   Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?
  
  Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a failure...
 
 Absolutely, looks like we'll have to wait and see...

I have to back up one step and challenge the 
thought-stopper, Only a madman wants the pundit
project to be a failure.  I don't agree with
that statement.

I *fervently* hope that it's a failure, and is
perceived as one as soon as possible.  My reasons
for thinking this way are that I have never seen
*any* indications that a bunch of pundits chanting,
no matter how many of them there are, can affect
the conditions of life for anyone on this planet.
And yet, the TMO continues to piss away millions
and millions and millions of dollars on projects
that *claim* to be producing more and more of 
these pundits.  So far, very little can be shown
to have resulted from all of this money spent.
The TMO can't produce very many of the actual
pundits themselves, and they can't produce any
research that says that the ones who do exist
have changed diddleysquat in the world since
they've been chanting.

So it's a very *pragmatic* and *practical* thing
on my part to hope that EITHER 1) proof of the
pundit's effectiveness is forthcoming, and soon, 
OR 2) the pundit project is recognized as the
dismal failure it is, and the money that is being
pissed away on it is diverted to more productive
ends, such as helping more people to learn TM.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
   richardhughes103@ wrote:
   
Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?
   
   Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a failure...
  
  Absolutely, looks like we'll have to wait and see...
 
 I have to back up one step and challenge the 
 thought-stopper, Only a madman wants the pundit
 project to be a failure.  I don't agree with
 that statement.
 
 I *fervently* hope that it's a failure, and is
 perceived as one as soon as possible.  My reasons
 for thinking this way are that I have never seen
 *any* indications that a bunch of pundits chanting,
 no matter how many of them there are, can affect
 the conditions of life for anyone on this planet.

Just because you fail to experience or cognize a correlation 
does not mean there isn't one.

Are you willing to bet the world on that you are right and other
people, such as HH MMY, is wrong in their cognizing and experiencing?










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
 wrote:
 
  A key ally with an important voice in the debate is Israel, whose
 leadership has warned for 
  years that it viewed any attempt by Iran to begin enriching uranium
 as a point of no 
  return. I was told by several officials that the White House's
 interest in preventing an Israeli 
  attack on a Muslim country, which would provoke a backlash across
 the region, was a 
  factor in its decision to begin the current operational planning. In
 a speech in Cleveland on 
  March 20th, President Bush depicted Ahmadinejad's hostility toward
 Israel as a serious 
  threat. It's a threat to world peace. He added, I made it clear,
 I'll make it clear again, that 
  we will use military might to protect our ally Israel.
  
  See http://tinyurl.com/hyfsf
 
 The hypocrisy here makes me vomit, as if Israel are doing anyhting to
 help world peace! There treatment of the palestinians is one of the
 worst human rights abuses happening on earth. And Bush has given them
 support in annexing even more land on the west bank thus guaranteeing
 endless war.
 
 The question is, would attacking Iran cause more trouble than letting
 them have the Bomb? This whole situation will be a good test of MMY
 prediction that we are on the brink of world peace due to the new
 pundit project. I like predictions as they either come true, or they
 don't...
 
 Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?

Yeah, you'll be proven wrong in all your mindless babbling about Israel.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam jpgillam@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- sparaig wrote:
  
   --- peterklutz wrote:
   
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a recent statement: The 
 Zionist
regime is a rotten, dried tree that will be eliminated by one 
   storm.
   
   Israel should beable to withstand any conventional attack, but at 
   what cost? No-one survives a nuclear exchange unscathed.
  
  Apparently one big reason the U.S. is coming down so 
  hard on Iran is that if we don't do it, Israel will, and then 
  the world of Islam will *really* be pissed.
 
 Except that I've been reading that Israel doesn't think
 Iran is that much of a threat to it.

Where did you read that - Al Jazeera dot com?

On 7 September 1997, the CBS newsmagazine Sixty Minutes broadcast an
alarming story in which former Russian National Security Adviser
Aleksandr Lebed claimed that the Russian military had lost track of
more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear bombs, any one of which could
kill up to 100,000 people.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:16 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
 
   Redd Foxx (Sanford and Sons ) [Blacks are uneducated, boisterous and
   crude]
 
 Don't forget Carroll O'Connor (Archie Bunker) White men can be all of 
 the above, too.


White womenk, too, I am sure..





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
  richardhughes103@ wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ 
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
richardhughes103@ wrote:

 Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?

Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a 
failure...
   
   Absolutely, looks like we'll have to wait and see...
  
  I have to back up one step and challenge the 
  thought-stopper, Only a madman wants the pundit
  project to be a failure.  I don't agree with
  that statement.
  
  I *fervently* hope that it's a failure, and is
  perceived as one as soon as possible.  My reasons
  for thinking this way are that I have never seen
  *any* indications that a bunch of pundits chanting,
  no matter how many of them there are, can affect
  the conditions of life for anyone on this planet.
 
 Just because you fail to experience or cognize a correlation 
 does not mean there isn't one.
 
 Are you willing to bet the world on that you are right and 
 other people, such as HH MMY, is wrong in their cognizing and 
 experiencing?

Based on working with him directly for fourteen 
years, and on watching his predictions and
proclamations in the decades since then, I 
would probably bet anything -- much less the
world -- that if Maharishi says that X is true,
it isn't.  

He just doesn't have a very good track record 
when it comes to seeing.  In fact, he has a 
rather *dismal* record...very *little* of what 
he has predicted or pronounced over the 
years has ever come to pass.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread peterklutz
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
   richardhughes103@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ 
 wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo 
 richardhughes103@ wrote:
 
  Anyone care to lay a bet on the outcome?
 
 Nope, but only a madman wants the pundit project to be a 
 failure...

Absolutely, looks like we'll have to wait and see...
   
   I have to back up one step and challenge the 
   thought-stopper, Only a madman wants the pundit
   project to be a failure.  I don't agree with
   that statement.
   
   I *fervently* hope that it's a failure, and is
   perceived as one as soon as possible.  My reasons
   for thinking this way are that I have never seen
   *any* indications that a bunch of pundits chanting,
   no matter how many of them there are, can affect
   the conditions of life for anyone on this planet.
  
  Just because you fail to experience or cognize a correlation 
  does not mean there isn't one.
  
  Are you willing to bet the world on that you are right and 
  other people, such as HH MMY, is wrong in their cognizing and 
  experiencing?
 
 Based on working with him directly for fourteen 
 years, and on watching his predictions and
 proclamations in the decades since then, I 
 would probably bet anything -- much less the
 world -- that if Maharishi says that X is true,
 it isn't.  
 
 He just doesn't have a very good track record 
 when it comes to seeing.  In fact, he has a 
 rather *dismal* record...very *little* of what 
 he has predicted or pronounced over the 
 years has ever come to pass.

You may believe this or not, but there are people out there who
probably understands the work of the TMO better than any the whining 
'insiders' that seem to populate this list.

I dare say so since what you are questioning here does not appear to
be the succesful application of something but its applicability in the
first place.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Research, Ethics and the Good Head

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj


On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:13 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiya:  I recently received this from the Shamatha Project, which will be a   rather sophisticated look at 'transcendence style meditation' using   all the methodologies in current brain research. You also might be   interested in the Neuroscientists who are spearheading the Mind and   Life Project:  http://www.investigatingthemind.org/ Of course, there's no evidence that "transcendence style meditation" has anything to do with TM.TM *is* a basic form of Shamatha (transcendence style meditation) using a mantra. There are hundreds of different types of of shamatha. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:16 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
 
   Redd Foxx (Sanford and Sons ) [Blacks are uneducated, 
  boisterous and crude]
 
 Don't forget Carroll O'Connor (Archie Bunker) White men 
 can be all of the above, too.

Or the classic example, Amos and Andy.

The original actors on the radio show were white. When
the show became so popular that it was ready to move to
television, they did a talent search and found two
black actors to play Amos and Andy on that show, which
went on to gain one of the most loyal fan bases and 
some of the highest ratings in television history.

Today, it's difficult if not impossible to find 
episodes of either the radio or the TV shows.  They've
become so politically incorrect that a huge piece of
broadcast history is unavailable to the general public.

And the reason is that some people set themselves up
as knowing what is appropriate for the public to see
and hear, and the public is so pussywhipped that they
allow these petty tyrants to get away with it.

As you can tell, I feel strongly about censorship,
especially censorship of humor.  In general, I think
it is important to examine the motives of anyone, 
anywhere who claims that humor should be censored.  
Look into it, and 9 times out of 10 I think you'll 
find a person with an agenda, someone who considers 
himself *worthy* of deciding what's appropriate and 
what's not, and considers the general public
*unworthy* of making those decisions for themselves.

In other words, a tyrant.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 4/15/06 1:03:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the 
  ability of the State Oracle to "see" thefuture accurately. The 
  Oracle in this case "saw"the end of Tibet as its people had known it, 
  andno possibility of stopping it.

Al Gore. America's state 
Oracle.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj

On Apr 14, 2006, at 7:52 PM, authfriend wrote:

 (I can hear Barry revving his engines now.)

You just *can't* let it go, can you?

If you can hear Barry revving his engines in your imagination  
before the poor guy has even said anything, you need to get a life.

Have ever considered aversion therapy?


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Just off the top of my head -- some comedy that possibly demean
  some groups and stereotypes -- but does so in the context of so 
  many mult-dimensional barbs aimed at many others that it is not 
  bigoted (these are top of my head, hypotheses - not firm 
  arguments ) 
snip
 
 I think the larger issue is that some people are 
 AFRAID of the power of comedy to reveal truth.
 
 Look at the basic issue being *ignored* in these 
 discussions (or the parts of them I see as a 
 result of killfiles).

Second time now Barry has broken his latest vow to
ignore me.

 The basic issue is the
 caste system. The original article just DEVASTATED
 the concept of the caste system, rather effectively.
 
 So what happened?  A few people tried (successfully)
 to DIVERT attention away from the real subject of
 the parody -- the caste system and its indefensible
 evils -- and get people to focus on whether the
 style of the humor was socially acceptable.

Or: That we all think the caste system is indefensible
is a given, no debate necessary.

 As far as I can tell, these attempts WORKED.  In the
 posts that I can see, only Shemp kept trying to come
 back to the real subject -- the caste system and how 
 much of an affront to humanity it is.

Anybody here *not* agree that the caste system is an
affront to humanity?  If so, I'll be *delighted* to
debate them on that point.

 Other folks
 got lured into the DIVERSION, and got lured into 
 arguing with people who were (essentially) trying 
 to dictate to them what is permissible as humor and 
 what is not.

See, TMers (particularly me), according to Barry, are
not allowed to express a personal opinion on ANYTHING.
If they do, they are ipso facto attempting to dictate
to others whatever that opinion advocates.

 Lesson to be learned from all this:  whenever someone
 reacts to a joke by trying to say that the humor in
 the joke is politically incorrect or racist or 
 demeaning, LOOK CLOSER.

Right, it actually may *be* racist or demeaning.

 Chances are that this is a tactic, a DISTRACTION, 
 meant to divert attention from the thing that the 
 joke made people laugh at, and see a new side of.

No, Barry, sorry, but you're once again taking your
own bilious paranoid fantasies for reality.



 
 Kudos to Shemp for being the only one to be able
 to stick to the subject...








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  [...]
   I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
   ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
   with to support the caste system.  But that's just
   me...if you believe differently, and think that 
   the caste system makes sense, please present the 
   reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.
  
  Some kind of caste system will always exist, whether its 
  meritocracy or based on your family ties or on your birth 
  chart or on personal wealth or on *something*.
  
  Usually, that *something* is several things combined, no 
  matter what social conventions claim.
  
  The caste system in India pre-British was somewhat different 
  than it was during the British rule or post-British. WHich 
  was better? How do you define better?
 
 Interesting, but I couldn't help but notice that you
 didn't really answer the question.  You tried to divert
 the subject into nitpicking about the caste system itself.
 
 So, once more -- do YOU personally believe that the 
 Indian caste system is a good system, and a valid one?  
 (You can have a different answer for pre-British rule 
 and post-British rule if you'd like.)
 
 If you believe it *is* a good system, and based on
 valid principles, please explain what you think those
 principles are.  Thanks.
 
 P.S. I'm not picking on you personally here, Lawson.
 I'm just pointing out what happens a *LOT* when 
 someone asks people to express an opinion on a 
 subject on which Maharishi's opinion is controversial.
 All too often, they hem and haw and hedge their bets
 and *fail* to say what *they* believe one way or
 another.  I think it's a wimpy-assed thing to do, 
 is all.


Actually, my opinion is based on... realizing that its a complex subject that 
even Hindus 
can't agree on. 







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:16 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
 
   Redd Foxx (Sanford and Sons ) [Blacks are uneducated, boisterous and
   crude]
 
 Don't forget Carroll O'Connor (Archie Bunker) White men can be all of 
 the above, too.


Carroll O'Conner once commented that he was scared by the number of people who 
watched 
the show because they AGREED with archie...






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Research, Ethics and the Good Head

2006-04-15 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:13 PM, sparaig wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   Hiya:
  
   I recently received this from the Shamatha Project, which will be a
   rather sophisticated look at 'transcendence style meditation' using
   all the methodologies in current brain research. You also might be
   interested in the Neuroscientists who are spearheading the Mind and
   Life Project:
  
   http://www.investigatingthemind.org/
  
 
  Of course, there's no evidence that transcendence style meditation
  has anything to do with TM.
 
 TM *is* a basic form of Shamatha (transcendence style meditation)  
 using a mantra. There are hundreds of different types of of shamatha.


That might be, but the site I quoted seemed to almost get TM and then 
wandered off into 
the ozone. It will be interesting to see if the physiological changes are the 
same for 
whatever transcendence style meditation technique they test.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  First, I don't think a comedy that features a
  particular minority-type character with flaws can
  really be said to be attributing the flaws to the
  minority as a whole, especially if the character
  is a sympathetic one.
 
 Some of the examples do this, some don't.

As I said, I haven't seen all the shows. 

  And if it's a group being demeaned, but at the same
  time the members of the group featured in the comedy
  are also shown to have attractive characteristics,
  it also falls short of the kind of thing I think is
  offensive.
 
 Some of the examples do this, some don't.

As I said, I haven't seen all the shows.

  At any rate, the shows you mention, partly because
  they're *shows*, are all in pretty much a different
  category than a piece of writing in which a group is
  demeaned without ever showing the group's positive side.
 
 Well South Park -- from what I have seen of it, pretty much demans
 everyone -- does not show a positive side when doing so --  and is
 hilarious.

I don't watch South Park, but I don't have any
argument with your thesis that if a comedy demeans
*everybody*, it's not bigoted.  But that is a different
point than the one I was making.

  One other point: When the unattractive characteristic
  is actually harmful, there's a lot more basis for
  holding it up to ridicule.  The caste system in
  India is clearly harmful.  I've heard the veneration of
  cows criticized as harmful--can't recall the reasons--but
  among the world's evils, it doesn't seem like such a
  big deal.  And what on earth is harmful about cooking
  over a fire?
  
  Those two were just plain gratuitous, suggesting that
  Indians are basically uncivilized.  Of course these
  things would be harmful *on a plane*, but nobody actually
  brings cows on a plane or tries to do their cooking over
  a fire on a plane.
  
  If they'd wanted to keep it consistent and inoffensive
  while still criticizing the caste system, they'd have
  thought of something that lower-caste people tend to
  do on planes that *isn't* harmful but is disdained by
  the higher castes, so that the criticism remained
  focused on those who are scornful of the lower castes,
  not those who are the object of the scorn.
 
 I think its pretty clear (to me) that if you tried your hand at
 writing comedy, it would be political correct, inoffensive, and not 
 funny.

I don't think I ever claimed to be a comedy writer,
actually.  But if a good comedy writer attempted what
I suggested, I suspect the result could very well be
inoffensive but quite funny (maybe not politically
correct--that's a whole 'nother can of worms).

  I'm sure it wasn't intended to be bigoted, it was just
  not well thought out.
 
 My take on the two lines you found offensive in the piece are
 different from yours. Why you don't find the satire (I didn't say
 high satire) in the piece -- ridiculing stereotypes -- by making 
 such extreme and silly, is a bit mystifying.

Where exactly did I say I didn't find the satire
in the piece?  I said to the contrary several times.
I laughed out loud at the burlap bag bit.

I can't see where you actually addressed the points I
made regarding those two lines and why they stuck out
from the rest of the piece.  Instead you set up a couple
of straw men to knock down.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Research, Ethics and the Good Head

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj


On Apr 15, 2006, at 9:45 AM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  On Apr 14, 2006, at 8:13 PM, sparaig wrote:   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: Hiya: I recently received this from the Shamatha Project, which will be a   rather sophisticated look at 'transcendence style meditation' using   all the methodologies in current brain research. You also might be   interested in the Neuroscientists who are spearheading the Mind and   Life Project: http://www.investigatingthemind.org/ Of course, there's no evidence that "transcendence style meditation"  has anything to do with TM.  TM *is* a basic form of Shamatha (transcendence style meditation)   using a mantra. There are hundreds of different types of of shamatha.That might be, but the site I quoted seemed to almost "get" TM and then wandered off into the ozone. It will be interesting to see if the physiological changes are the same for whatever "transcendence style meditation" technique they test.I suggest you read "The Buddhist Tradition of Samatha: Methods for Refining and Examining Consciousness." Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, No. 2-3, 1999. pp. 175-187. It is available at:http://alanwallace.org/Wallace-Samatha.pdfYou'll see the model of meditation does go quite a bit deeper and further, so one would expect the results will be different.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread markmeredith2002
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
 markmeredith@ wrote:
 
  From The OnionApril 12, 2006 | Issue 42•15
  
  MUMBAI—Air India, the subcontinent's largest airline, announced it
  will offer upgraded Business Caste seating on all flights starting in
  July. More legroom, wider seats—and no need to associate with the
  manual laborers, a spokesman for the airline said Tuesday. Our
  business travelers must have lived good past lives to deserve this.
  Air India still ranks at the bottom of the airline industry in
  customer satisfaction, with a high volume of complaints about cooking
  fires in the climate-uncontrolled cabins, wandering cows that flight
  attendants refuse to remove, and the Untouchable Coach Caste, which
  is towed behind Air India jetliners in a giant burlap sack.
 
 Does this strike anybody as just a wee bit racist?

The Onion is poking fun at the belief in the caste system, not a race
of people.  While beliefs may permeate a culture for some time, but it
does not define the race.  Ammachi, who has represented Hinduism at
the world parliament of religions, has spoken out against the caste
system, saying it is not scripture, but was added to the scriptures
later on by powerful men wanting to preserve power.  IT may take a
long time to dissolve, but the caste system belief will probably
decline in influence as India continues to develop technologically.

Were cartoons in 19th century Boston that poked fun at slavery racist
against whites?  or southern baptists??  Anyway, I'm glad those
cartoons were published then and that the Onion is doing what it does now.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Onion is poking fun at the belief in the caste system, not a 
 race
 of people.  While beliefs may permeate a culture for some time, 
 but it
 does not define the race.  Ammachi, who has represented Hinduism at
 the world parliament of religions, has spoken out against the caste
 system, saying it is not scripture, but was added to the scriptures
 later on by powerful men wanting to preserve power.  IT may take a
 long time to dissolve, but the caste system belief will probably
 decline in influence as India continues to develop technologically.
 
 Were cartoons in 19th century Boston that poked fun at slavery 
 racist against whites?  or southern baptists??  Anyway, I'm glad 
 those cartoons were published then and that the Onion is doing 
 what it does now.

Hear, hear.  That's my belief as well.

The caste system is indefensible, a blight upon 
humanity. IMO satirizing a belief in it, using
any means whatsoever, is not only legitimate but
overdue.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:11 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 > Don't forget Carroll O'Connor (Archie Bunker) White men 
 > can be all of the above, too.

 Or the classic example, Amos and Andy.

 The original actors on the radio show were white. When
 the show became so popular that it was ready to move to
 television, they did a talent search and found two
 black actors to play Amos and Andy on that show, which
 went on to gain one of the most loyal fan bases and 
 some of the highest ratings in television history.

Interesting, I didn't know that.

 Today, it's difficult if not impossible to find 
 episodes of either the radio or the TV shows.  They've
 become so politically incorrect that a huge piece of
 broadcast history is unavailable to the general public.

 And the reason is that some people set themselves up
 as knowing what is appropriate for the public to see
 and hear, and the public is so pussywhipped that they
 allow these petty tyrants to get away with it.

Same thing with the 3 Stooges--much of their humor is pretty racist by today's standards, but was fine in the 50s.  It should all be available as IMO it's one of the best ways for society to deal with it's racist past and  finally move on.


[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
jpgillam@ 
  wrote:
snip
   Apparently one big reason the U.S. is coming down so 
   hard on Iran is that if we don't do it, Israel will, and then 
   the world of Islam will *really* be pissed.
  
  Except that I've been reading that Israel doesn't think
  Iran is that much of a threat to it.
 
 Where did you read that - Al Jazeera dot com?

Uh, no, a post by Steve Clemons on TPM Cafe.  See
some quotes and a link at the end of this post.

Not sure why you'd think that would be an Al Jazeera
position.  Seems to me the Al Jazeera position would
be exactly the opposite.

The context was criticism of the administration's
fear-mongering, as opposed to Israel's purportedly more
sensible perspective.  That Israel is likely to attack
Iran, so we need to do it first, is a talking point of
Bush's supporters, so of course it has been given great
prominence in the mainstream media.

 On 7 September 1997, the CBS newsmagazine Sixty Minutes broadcast 
 an alarming story in which former Russian National Security Adviser
 Aleksandr Lebed claimed that the Russian military had lost track of
 more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear bombs, any one of which could
 kill up to 100,000 people.
 
 http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/News/Lebedbomb.html

And the relevance of this to Israel's position on Iran's
nuclear capabilities is what, exactly?

From Clemons's post, titled U.S. War Planners Should
Listen to Israel Regarding Iran:

As I stated on Christopher Lydon's NPR show, Radio Open Source, 
tonight -- one of the take-aways from my recent Israel trip is that 
Israeli national security bureaucrats -- diplomats and generals -- 
have far greater confidence that there are numerous potential 
solutions to the growing Iran crisis short of bombing them in an 
invasive, hot attack.

One of the issues that came up in many of the national security 
related discussions I had was that Israel has maintained and 
cultivated a very strong human intelligence network inside Iran. The 
two nations were close strategic allies 25 years ago -- and continue, 
in many behind-the-scenes ways, to communicate and possibly even to 
coordinate certain actions. It doesn't mean that Israel is ready to 
appease Iran's regional ambitions, but it does mean that I have 
witnessed far more worries about Iranian President Ahmadinejad's anti-
Holocaust and anti-Israel rhetoric in the U.S. than I did in Tel Aviv 
or Jerusalem. 

Many serious Iran watchers in Israel think that chances are 
relatively high that internal developments will emerge in Iran to 
constrain Ahmadinejad's political options and political life

Yes, those putting war plans together for Iran think carefully. We 
have botched so much already; don't repeat errors. 

And in this case, TALK TO THE ISRAELIS -- the ones responsible for 
national security there. I found their sensibilities on Iran to be 
remarkably well informed, nuanced, confident, and sensible. 

Nearly everyone I spoke to in Israel who ranged in political 
sympathies from the Likud right to Maretz left thought that the tone 
of the AIPAC conference had been too shrill and that Israel thought 
it wrong-headed and too impulsive to be engaged in saber-rattling 
with Iran at this stage. 

In the past, I've been occasionally critical of Israeli influence 
over U.S. decisionmakers when I felt that American and Israeli 
national security interests were not as convergent in some respective 
case as some argued. However, in this instance on Iran, Israel's 
national security thinkers and diplomats are on the side of logic -- 
and it is in American national interests to hear the Israeli position 
and consider the roots of their surprising position.

Steven Clemons is Senior Fellow and Director of the American Strategy 
Program at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular 
political blog, The Washington Note.

http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/28567







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Apr 14, 2006, at 7:52 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  (I can hear Barry revving his engines now.)
 
 You just *can't* let it go, can you?
 
 If you can hear Barry revving his engines in your imagination  
 before the poor guy has even said anything, you need to get a life.

Ah, yes, poor Barry.

As it happens, Barry was revving his engines about
my views on a different topic, as we've seen all too
clearly this morning.  This only a few days after
his latest public vow to ignore me (after the earlier
one had collapsed in a matter of a few weeks).

But I'll *guarantee* you that if someone had quoted
my comment to which I was referring and Barry had
seen it, he'd have posted a rant about it.

Now, if I were Barry and you were me, I'd claim you
were attempting to distract attention from Barry's
racist parallel attempting to cast the Israelites
as terrorists.  But of course you would never do
anything like that, would you?




 
 Have ever considered aversion therapy?








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
  markmeredith@ wrote:
  
   From The OnionApril 12, 2006 | Issue 42•15
   
   MUMBAI—Air India, the subcontinent's largest airline, announced 
it
   will offer upgraded Business Caste seating on all flights 
starting in
   July. More legroom, wider seats—and no need to associate with 
the
   manual laborers, a spokesman for the airline said Tuesday. Our
   business travelers must have lived good past lives to deserve 
this.
   Air India still ranks at the bottom of the airline industry in
   customer satisfaction, with a high volume of complaints about
   cooking fires in the climate-uncontrolled cabins, wandering 
   cows that flight attendants refuse to remove, and
   the Untouchable Coach Caste, which is towed behind Air India 
   jetliners in a giant burlap sack.
  
  Does this strike anybody as just a wee bit racist?
 
 The Onion is poking fun at the belief in the caste system, not a
 race of people.

That it's poking fun at belief in the caste system is
obvious.

My comment referred to the lines concerning the cooking
fires in the cabin and cows wandering around loose.  I
had thought *that* would be obvious, but apparently not.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Getting 'Lost'

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Last Christmas my brother gave me a DVD set of the 
 first season of the TV series 'Lost.'  Evil bastard.
 
 It's a weird soap opera, but as addicting (and as
 revelatory) as any other soap opera, if you allow 
 it to be.  I allowed it to be.  I have a weakness 
 for soap operas because they tend to portray the
 reality of most people's everyday lives *much* more
 accurately than the great works do.  The great
 works are all about pretense and trying to see 
 nobility in the stupid shit we do; soap operas are
 about *accepting* the stupid shit we do, laughing 
 at it, and thus learning a little from it.
 
 Besides, 'Lost' is a TV show for which the 'pitch' 
 was probably something along the lines of, Well...
 it's basically 'Survivor' meets 'X Files'...we'll 
 get them hooked on the basic concept in the first 
 season, and then *really* fuck with their minds in 
 the next seasons...
 
 Their marketing ploy worked, at least on me. I've
 been waiting with 'bated breath for the second 
 season to run in France, and unfortunately need 
 to keep waiting, cuz it doesn't seem to be on the 
 horizon anytime soon.  But it is showing in the 
 US, for those of you who need a good addiction to 
 add to your lives.  Here's a good review of the 
 series, from (of all places) Tricycle, a respected 
 Buddhist periodical:
 
 http://tricycle.com/issues/editors_pick/1899-1.html
 
 The reviewer's book, Cinema Nirvana: Enlightenment 
 Lessons from the Movies, sounds worth looking into, 
 too...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies - correction

2006-04-15 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- jyouells2000 wrote:
 
And the other thing was from the Course in Miracles about the
  difference between forgivness on the level of content and action on
  the level of form. Forgive in the heart and act natually on the level
  of form. 
 
 Can you elaborate?
 
 Seems to me that forgiveness in the heart will have 
 a profound influence on what actions ensue.
  
  BTW, if that was an attack, I'll just turn the other check, it's only
  email after all :-)  
 
 It wasn't meant as an attack, but I admit it was aggressive humor. 
 Thanks for your forbearance.


Seems to me that forgiveness in the heart will have 
a profound influence on what actions ensue.


Yup, but not necessarly Ghandi-like non-violence in a personal defense
situation, is what I was clumsily trying to convey. And as far as the
subtle interpretation of re-re-re-re translated scripture, I think
that's taken far too literally. And that's what I was trying to show
as well. Take the recent stir about the 'Gospel of Judas' - lots more
than we thought we knew. 


And TorquoiseB, as far as the caste system - strongly against it. I
think there are more chances for it's distortion for control purposes
than even our flawed system. Think Vedic Surf ... u    

JohnY
  






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Getting 'Lost'

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
I've been watching this series again, and y'know the
reviewer from Tricycle is right on...it really *IS*
a spiritual series, and a *consciously* spiritual
series at that. Its brilliance is that it managed to 
suck the general public in on the surface plot level, 
while on a more subtle level it gave them some very
high dharma talks indeed. 

Nice series, highly recommended, and even friendly
to the eyes. It's filmed on the Big Island of Hawaii,
for those who have been there...one of the more beau-
tiful spots on the planet.  For the women Matthew 
Fox, Naveen Andrews and Josh Holloway provide 
bablicious eye candy. And for the guys, Evangeline 
Lilly and Yunjin Kim are both To Die For.  :-)

My favorite episode so far in this re-viewing is
called 'Tabula Rasa.' Look up the term on Wikipedia
to get an idea of the mindset of the creators of
'Lost.'  They're interesting people.  The series 
is, from one point of view, a mystical-adventure-
soap opera that takes place in the Bardo. Everyone
on the island has a past, and carries some baggage
(samskaras) with them. But at the same time, they
have been given a new chance to push the Reboot
button, to leave the past behind them and Start 
Over.

And Start Over is exactly what they get to do,
every episode. :-) The mystery doesn't really ever
resolve itself. Instead, it gets deeper and deeper.
The writing reminds me of a line from the Tao Te 
Ching:  From wonder into wonder life will open.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Last Christmas my brother gave me a DVD set of the 
 first season of the TV series 'Lost.'  Evil bastard.
 
 It's a weird soap opera, but as addicting (and as
 revelatory) as any other soap opera, if you allow 
 it to be.  I allowed it to be.  I have a weakness 
 for soap operas because they tend to portray the
 reality of most people's everyday lives *much* more
 accurately than the great works do.  The great
 works are all about pretense and trying to see 
 nobility in the stupid shit we do; soap operas are
 about *accepting* the stupid shit we do, laughing 
 at it, and thus learning a little from it.
 
 Besides, 'Lost' is a TV show for which the 'pitch' 
 was probably something along the lines of, Well...
 it's basically 'Survivor' meets 'X Files'...we'll 
 get them hooked on the basic concept in the first 
 season, and then *really* fuck with their minds in 
 the next seasons...
 
 Their marketing ploy worked, at least on me. I've
 been waiting with 'bated breath for the second 
 season to run in France, and unfortunately need 
 to keep waiting, cuz it doesn't seem to be on the 
 horizon anytime soon.  But it is showing in the 
 US, for those of you who need a good addiction to 
 add to your lives.  Here's a good review of the 
 series, from (of all places) Tricycle, a respected 
 Buddhist periodical:
 
 http://tricycle.com/issues/editors_pick/1899-1.html
 
 The reviewer's book, Cinema Nirvana: Enlightenment 
 Lessons from the Movies, sounds worth looking into, 
 too...







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  That it [the Onion article] was an effective satire 
  [of the caste system] is obvious. Case closed.
 
 Well, since I'm not bound to live my life the way you
 think I should, I'll reopen it, in its own thread.  :-)

My wording was not well-crafted. I did not mean to imply that the
thread or topic should be closed -- but rather we are not obligated to
discuss something you feel we should (was the satire effective), and
ignore all others (the different types of satire)  -- because you deem
them diversions. 

But since you raise the topic in its OWN thread, well that changes
everything. :)

 I honestly believe that a lot of folks here ARE
 uncomfortable with the subject of the caste system
 coming up on this forum. And I think that the reason 
 they're uncomfortable with this is that Maharishi 
 *clearly* believes in it and supports it, and they're 
 *embarrassed* by the fact that he believes in it.

Well MMY says a lot of things that an employee and tight, close
follower would and should feel uncomfortable with. Thats why a lot of
people who were such, are no longer (close followers). I think the
latter is a much larger group here, and in the world, is much larger
that the former. So when you say a lot of people, its a bit odd to
me --  its a relatively small group.
 
 Only a couple of weeks ago, someone posted a long
 quote of Maharishi's in which he not only supported
 the concept of the caste system, 

The BIG question is how various parties are defining the LABEL caste
system. I think there are many different connotations and
implications for the same word. Without clearly defining the what the
words caste system means to then, people are discussing apples and
oranges. Or apples and fish.

In his MMY high level way -- a la its easier for people to learn the
craft, business or professon of thier family -- and then they have
more time for spiritual stuff. Thats basically HIS definition. He
didn't say anything or support social discrimination, sub-castes, or
even inter-caste marriage (which the vedas allow -- with guidelines).

 but tried to
 reinvent it and pretend that it was based on
 Jyotish, not inheritance.  

MMY said that-- based on jyotish? I thought that was a respondant
who got a bit mixed-up about the use of a fairly obscure jyotish
calculation.

The subject sank like
 a stone, with very few people even stepping up to the
 plate to take a swing at it.  

As is the case with many topics. For eample, I think Iran being
successful in processing weapons grade plutonium is quite important --
but I have not commented. No comment does not imply no interest.

I noticed Ingegerd
 (I think) taking a stand against the caste system, 
 and I think that Shemp has consistently taken a
 stand against it, but it didn't seem as if others 
 wanted to deal with the subject much at all. 

Seems is the operative word. Seems to you is the key concept.


Then,
 a couple of weeks later, the subject comes up again,
 this time in a parody article, and the response to 
 it is a bunch of followup discussions that are basic-
 ally arguments about the relative political correct-
 ness of the parody's humor...nary a word on the 
 subject of the  parody itself.

Like so many other good, worthy and interesting points. So is your
point that the group is filled with dullards, slackers, apathetic
skimmers, etc.?
 
 I just find all the aversion fascinating, that's all.

Thats your mistake imo, that lack of comment on something you want to
discuss, means that other readers are lacking or devious. Frankly, its
often hard to make a worhty topic STICK here. (Though often effortless
to have a silly topic STICK) If you are really interested in getting a
discussion going on a topic, you (often) have to work at it. Like
starting a new thread. Good start. But calling everyone pathetic
retards (paraphrasing) is less of a good start.
 
 So what's YOUR feeling about the caste system, eh?

Are you canadian now?

 Is there ANY validity to it, 

I think MMY's high level version of caste, as stated above, has some
logic and common sense. And it is followed successfully by many
families in the US and elsewhere. Without all the abberations of caste
that you seem hung up on and which MMY did not endorse.

or is it just another
 way that the current ruling elite of a nation finds 
 a way to make sure that their children rule after 
 them 

All parents want their kids to be successful. But just because a
doctor mother and father want their med school kid to be successful,
does not guarantee much. The kid has to perform and compete in a very
competitive meritocracy.

and that the currently-powerless are *kept* 
powerless?  

You have not made any case, other than rhetoric, to support this
contention based on the MMY definition of caste system.
 
 I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
 ANY 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  [...]
   I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
   ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
   with to support the caste system.  But that's just
   me...if you believe differently, and think that 
   the caste system makes sense, please present the 
   reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.
  
  Some kind of caste system will always exist, whether its 
  meritocracy or based on your family ties or on your birth 
  chart or on personal wealth or on *something*.
  
  Usually, that *something* is several things combined, no 
  matter what social conventions claim.
  
  The caste system in India pre-British was somewhat different 
  than it was during the British rule or post-British. WHich 
  was better? How do you define better?
 
 Interesting, but I couldn't help but notice that you
 didn't really answer the question.  You tried to divert
 the subject into nitpicking about the caste system itself.
 
 So, once more -- do YOU personally believe that the 
 Indian caste system is a good system, and a valid one?  
 (You can have a different answer for pre-British rule 
 and post-British rule if you'd like.)
 
 If you believe it *is* a good system, and based on
 valid principles, please explain what you think those
 principles are.  Thanks.
 
 P.S. I'm not picking on you personally here, Lawson.
 I'm just pointing out what happens a *LOT* when 
 someone asks people to express an opinion on a 
 subject on which Maharishi's opinion is controversial.
 All too often, they hem and haw and hedge their bets
 and *fail* to say what *they* believe one way or
 another.  I think it's a wimpy-assed thing to do, 
 is all.

Worse yet are people who ask for comments on non-defined terms, then
bash the person for not responding. Thats not only a wimpy-assed thing
to do, its a dumb-ass thing to do.


 is all.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
 gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
 mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
 to argue abstraact labels...

I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
thought about the caste system, you answered.
End of story.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   First, I don't think a comedy that features a
   particular minority-type character with flaws can
   really be said to be attributing the flaws to the
   minority as a whole, especially if the character
   is a sympathetic one.
  
  Some of the examples do this, some don't.
 
 As I said, I haven't seen all the shows. 
 
   And if it's a group being demeaned, but at the same
   time the members of the group featured in the comedy
   are also shown to have attractive characteristics,
   it also falls short of the kind of thing I think is
   offensive.
  
  Some of the examples do this, some don't.
 
 As I said, I haven't seen all the shows.
 
   At any rate, the shows you mention, partly because
   they're *shows*, are all in pretty much a different
   category than a piece of writing in which a group is
   demeaned without ever showing the group's positive side.
  
  Well South Park -- from what I have seen of it, pretty much demans
  everyone -- does not show a positive side when doing so --  and is
  hilarious.
 
 I don't watch South Park, but I don't have any
 argument with your thesis that if a comedy demeans
 *everybody*, it's not bigoted.  But that is a different
 point than the one I was making.

Well as I understood you, you made a distinction between a comedian or
forum that pokes barbs at everyone (all agreed its ok) and when such
becomes demeaning of a particular groups -- even its all groups
(overtime). I was responding to the demeaing part of your arguemnt. 

 
   One other point: When the unattractive characteristic
   is actually harmful, there's a lot more basis for
   holding it up to ridicule.  The caste system in
   India is clearly harmful.  I've heard the veneration of
   cows criticized as harmful--can't recall the reasons--but
   among the world's evils, it doesn't seem like such a
   big deal.  And what on earth is harmful about cooking
   over a fire?
   
   Those two were just plain gratuitous, suggesting that
   Indians are basically uncivilized.  Of course these
   things would be harmful *on a plane*, but nobody actually
   brings cows on a plane or tries to do their cooking over
   a fire on a plane.
   
   If they'd wanted to keep it consistent and inoffensive
   while still criticizing the caste system, they'd have
   thought of something that lower-caste people tend to
   do on planes that *isn't* harmful but is disdained by
   the higher castes, so that the criticism remained
   focused on those who are scornful of the lower castes,
   not those who are the object of the scorn.
  
  I think its pretty clear (to me) that if you tried your hand at
  writing comedy, it would be political correct, inoffensive, and not 
  funny.
 
 I don't think I ever claimed to be a comedy writer,
 actually.  But if a good comedy writer attempted what
 I suggested, I suspect the result could very well be
 inoffensive but quite funny (maybe not politically
 correct--that's a whole 'nother can of worms).
 
   I'm sure it wasn't intended to be bigoted, it was just
   not well thought out.
  
  My take on the two lines you found offensive in the piece are
  different from yours. Why you don't find the satire (I didn't say
  high satire) in the piece -- ridiculing stereotypes -- by making 
  such extreme and silly, is a bit mystifying.
 
 Where exactly did I say I didn't find the satire
 in the piece?  I said to the contrary several times.
 I laughed out loud at the burlap bag bit.

OK. But now Iam getting confused on your point.
 
 I can't see where you actually addressed the points I
 made regarding those two lines and why they stuck out
 from the rest of the piece.  

As above, I thought you were saying that when a particular group is
demeaned its inappropriate. I countered (over several posts) that
while I agree that if the demeaining is limited to a particular group
-- for example, good ol' boys in the south in the 50's, 60's with
racial jokes, or the boys club in corp america in 70's-90's with women
jokes, then thats a social stratifying power thing. But if the
demeaning is broad-based its fair game. 

Instead you set up a couple
 of straw men to knock down.

Not on purpose. I have tried to address your points as I understood them.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
 markmeredith@ wrote:
 
  The Onion is poking fun at the belief in the caste system, not a 
  race
  of people.  While beliefs may permeate a culture for some time, 
  but it
  does not define the race.  Ammachi, who has represented Hinduism at
  the world parliament of religions, has spoken out against the caste
  system, saying it is not scripture, but was added to the scriptures
  later on by powerful men wanting to preserve power.  IT may take a
  long time to dissolve, but the caste system belief will probably
  decline in influence as India continues to develop technologically.
  
  Were cartoons in 19th century Boston that poked fun at slavery 
  racist against whites?  or southern baptists??  Anyway, I'm glad 
  those cartoons were published then and that the Onion is doing 
  what it does now.
 
 Hear, hear.  That's my belief as well.
 
 The caste system is indefensible, a blight upon 
 humanity. IMO satirizing a belief in it, using
 any means whatsoever, is not only legitimate but
 overdue.

Which is what I am saying, and I beleive everyone is saying. But
because we don't discuss things the way you want them discussed, we
are either (paraphrasing) slackers, retards, racists, or
classelitists. Or all. Barry world is a strange place dude.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
  gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
  mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
  to argue abstraact labels...
 
 I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
 thought about the caste system, you answered.
 End of story.

OK. So I am asking you. What does caste system mean to you. What are
the specific attributes that you object to. And why do you object to
them? 

Up until now, on this VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC, as you have stated, all
that you have done is bash a label. You have provided no substance to
the debate. Thats seems to be a shame, if not a total cop-out on this
VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC.
 
Or are you a member of a caste that gets to ask quesions but not
answer them. or debate them.








 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Getting 'Lost'

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've been watching this series again, and y'know the
 reviewer from Tricycle is right on...it really *IS*
 a spiritual series, and a *consciously* spiritual
 series at that. 


Or maybe thats a feel good justification for watching crap-TV. :)





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj

On Apr 15, 2006, at 10:34 AM, authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Apr 14, 2006, at 7:52 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
   (I can hear Barry revving his engines now.)
 
  You just *can't* let it go, can you?
 
  If you can hear Barry revving his engines in your imagination
  before the poor guy has even said anything, you need to get a life.

 Ah, yes, poor Barry.

 As it happens, Barry was revving his engines about
 my views on a different topic, as we've seen all too
 clearly this morning.  This only a few days after
 his latest public vow to ignore me (after the earlier
 one had collapsed in a matter of a few weeks).

 But I'll *guarantee* you that if someone had quoted
 my comment to which I was referring and Barry had
 seen it, he'd have posted a rant about it.

 Now, if I were Barry and you were me, I'd claim you
 were attempting to distract attention from Barry's
 racist parallel attempting to cast the Israelites
 as terrorists.  But of course you would never do
 anything like that, would you?


Considering I had not read any those posts, it's rather unlikely.

If you're not pleased with Barry's performance in ignoring you, why  
don't you see if you can counter that with a longer period of non- 
response to his posts?

Or try aversion therapy.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
   gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
   mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
   to argue abstraact labels...
  
  I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
  thought about the caste system, you answered.
  End of story.
 
 OK. So I am asking you. 

And I'm ignoring you.  Life sucks sometimes, doesn't it.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
  gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
  mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
  to argue abstraact labels...
 
 I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
 thought about the caste system, you answered.


 End of story.

Ah, the discussion MUST conform to Barry's way of wishing it to go.

Its my football (thread) so you gotta play by my rules or I am going
to take my football home.

It seems to me you apitomize many characteristics of the caste system
that you appear to dispise.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
   gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
   mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
   to argue abstraact labels...
  
  I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
  thought about the caste system, you answered.
  
  End of story.
 
 Ah, the discussion MUST conform to Barry's way of wishing it to go.
 
 Its my football (thread) so you gotta play by my rules or I 
 am going to take my football home.
 
 It seems to me you apitomize many characteristics of the 
 caste system that you appear to dispise.

Whatever.

From my point of view, you're bored and are trying
to start an argument.

I'm not bored, and am avoiding the argument.

I think I've got the better deal...  :-)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread Bhairitu
The operative word in your comment is the word system.  We all 
position ourselves in society by our ability to deal with society and 
nature in general.  We seek to improve our ability to do that by seeking 
not just enlightenment but education.  By nature there then are castes 
(which I think is the point Maharishi is making).  The system part is 
where the power holders seek to keep people from rising to take away 
their power.  They tell people they can't rise above their caste but 
obviously people can.  If the rich were the smartest then they would all 
be the ones graduating with honors from colleges and universities and 
the poor would be flunking out.  Be we know that is not true as you will 
probably find more poor and middle income folks graduating with honors 
than the lazy rich kids.

Currently we have a bunch in the world that would like to keep the 
scenario I just mentioned from happening by taking away the funding that 
makes it possible to rise above their caste or class as we call it 
in the west.  They also seek to pay all labor even skilled and educated 
cheap wages.  They are using all their weapons including their control 
of the media to try to make that happen.  But they themselves are 
ignorant and karma dictates that because they've made a push to do this 
society will react in an equal and opposite reaction against them and 
probably too far a swing of the pendulum too.

I was musing the other day what divine justice it would be if the 
first tenants of the detention camps that Halliburton is building here 
in the US would be the Halliburton executives themselves.  ;-)


TurquoiseB wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Of course we are not bound to live our lives the way 
you think we ought to. 



Nope. 

  

That it [the Onion article] was an effective satire 
[of the caste system] is obvious. Case closed.



Well, since I'm not bound to live my life the way you
think I should, I'll reopen it, in its own thread.  :-)

I honestly believe that a lot of folks here ARE
uncomfortable with the subject of the caste system
coming up on this forum. And I think that the reason 
they're uncomfortable with this is that Maharishi 
*clearly* believes in it and supports it, and they're 
*embarrassed* by the fact that he believes in it.

Only a couple of weeks ago, someone posted a long
quote of Maharishi's in which he not only supported
the concept of the caste system, but tried to
reinvent it and pretend that it was based on
Jyotish, not inheritance.  The subject sank like
a stone, with very few people even stepping up to the
plate to take a swing at it.  I noticed Ingegerd
(I think) taking a stand against the caste system, 
and I think that Shemp has consistently taken a
stand against it, but it didn't seem as if others 
wanted to deal with the subject much at all. Then,
a couple of weeks later, the subject comes up again,
this time in a parody article, and the response to 
it is a bunch of followup discussions that are basic-
ally arguments about the relative political correct-
ness of the parody's humor...nary a word on the 
subject of the parody itself.

I just find all the aversion fascinating, that's all.

So what's YOUR feeling about the caste system, eh?
Is there ANY validity to it, or is it just another
way that the current ruling elite of a nation finds 
a way to make sure that their children rule after 
them and that the currently-powerless are *kept* 
powerless?  

I think it's the latter. I don't think there are
ANY rational arguments that someone can come up
with to support the caste system.  But that's just
me...if you believe differently, and think that 
the caste system makes sense, please present the 
reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advance.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




  




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj


On Apr 15, 2006, at 4:09 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:I think it's the latter. I don't think there areANY rational arguments that someone can come upwith to support the caste system.  But that's justme...if you believe differently, and think that the caste system makes sense, please present the reasons why you feel that way.  Thanks in advanceFrom: While the Gods Play by Alain Danielou. You'll also find out why the Maharishi wants to lay out cities like he does...The Castes (Varnä) MAN is a social animal, which is to say that the human species forms a whole, an organism, whose various cells have their own distinct functions. This is why the different lineages of mankind exist. The qualities and abilities of each improve over the generations so as to form an efficient, harmonious society that is capable of carrying out the role assigned to the human species in the plan of creation. In the same way that the different organs of the body have different functions, even though they originate in cells, so in the plan laid out for the species there exist particular lineages that are more adapted to certain functions and whose abilities, once they are recognized, encouraged, and developed, become hereditary. Each human grouping, each race, each family, must seek to uphold its integrity, to improve its particular speciality, and to play the social role corresponding to its nature, and above all else to preserve and transmit its own special genetic and cultural heritage. Our virtues are to a great extent transmissible, being connected to aspects of character that can be inherited. This is why they must be cultivated and improved so that we may play our role to the full in the brief span of our existence. There is thus for everyone a "natural law" (Dharmä) that regulates the use and development of mental and physical characteristics, inherited at birth, together with the gift of life itself, so that we may play to the full our part in the evolution of our lineage. Ancestor worship involves above all else the respect and transmission of our double heritage, genetic and cultural. Each being is born unique. In the almost infinite number of possible combinations of the elements that constitute the living being, it is beyond belief that the same arrangement could be repeated, that two beings could be absolutely identical, with the same nature, appearance, function, and station; nevertheless, the human types defined by heredity can be classified. In order to achieve his physical and spiritual destiny, each individual must establish his basis; determine the class to which he belongs, the duties and qualities inherent in that class, and its unique characteristics so that he may make them productive; and, eventually, go beyond them. Everyone must achieve the perfection of a social or exterior role before he can perfect his personal or interior role. The two roles can be vastly different and even contradictory; thus, we see that men from the artisan castes can earn their living in their humble professions and yet can at the same time be philosophers, holy men, and artists before whom kings and Brahmans bow with respect. The circumstances of our birth correspond to the level of development of our own lineage and to the conditions in which we can best progress. Each of the links in the lineage is found at a particular stage of the evolution of that species‑in its youth, maturity, or decline. This is why individuals of different races are not at the same level in their evolution. There is no advantage to anyone in wanting to change one's situation or function, nor in wanting to perform the duties of another. Thus, except in very rare cases, one does not change one's sex, species, race, or caste during one's life. The external hierarchy of beings and things is often the opposite of the interior order. This is the reason why, during the Kali Yuga (the present world age), it is most desirable to be either woman or worker (Shudrä), for through mere humility and devotion to their role or work, these people can attain exterior perfection, which in turn permits the interior development that frees them from the weighty chains of life and leads them effortlessly toward the higher spheres of knowledge. The state of prince, or Brahman, noble and magnificent though it may seem, is disastrous in the dark age, for the discipline that they demand is so severe and the virtues so difficult that failure is almost certain. It is not at all by chance that for nearly the last thousand years, almost all the great mystic poets and holy men of India have been men of humble birth who could so easily free themselves from their social and ritual responsibilities and devote themselves to their inner life. An organic society can only exist on the basis of a division of powers and functions. With the appearance of urban societies at the dawn of the Kali Yuga, a system developed in India whereby the different groups were able to intermingle and collaborate; each 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   
Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
to argue abstraact labels...
   
   I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
   thought about the caste system, you answered.
   End of story.
  
  OK. So I am asking you. 
 
 And I'm ignoring you.  Life sucks sometimes, doesn't it.

Which for me, is good thing.

But you are the one that started this thread because you said it was
so important to discuss. And you slammed all slackers, TB's and
retards (in your view) on the list for not fully engaging in the topic
you felt to be so important. So when someone asks you to actually
provide some substantive discussion, you punt. Shutdown. 

Wow, you can't make this stuff up. I looked in the dictionary under
hypocrite and it had your picture. 
 






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?

2006-04-15 Thread Vaj


Continued from DanielouCoexistence EVERY society must make way for invaders and migrants. In this way, linguistic, religious, and professional groupings develop. These must be recognized and linked to the four principal groups, even while maintaining their separate identity, solidarity, and the means of defending their cultural uniqueness. Besides a few exceptional individuals, who are mutants and therefore tend to associate together in a kind of parallel society, the problems of individual freedom in relation to social order are the concern of groups rather than of individuals Every caste or ethnic, religious, or professional grouping Wilds to establish rules appropriate for itself, building up codes of behavior that cannot be generalized. Rules of morality that imply codes of honor regulate the activities of each group. If these rules are not followed, the groups self‑destruct. Immigrants belonging to a foreign culture will alter the social order if their autonomy is denied and they are forced to assimilate. The hierarchy of the caste system allows for the coexistence and collaboration of human groups even though they belong to different levels of evolution. Attempts to bring about equality are destructive of the individuality of the person and of the group. Coexistence demands respect for all the differences and varieties in human beings. In this sense, traditional Hindu society is fundamentally antiracist. It rejects the colonialization through assimilation that the current Indian government, infected by Western ideas, is using to assassinate the primitive tribes left over from the Satya Yuga and totally unable to adapt to the ways of life of the modern world. The government claims that these groups are the backward elements of a single population; but one cannot respect and protect the various human societies by refusing to acknowledge their very existence, autonomy, importance, rights, and uniqueness. Every group has its usefulness, a role to play in the balance of nature and society. The caste system tries to determine this role, stabilize it, and make it easier. The abilities, duties, virtues, and rules of each group are different: it is impossible to establish behavioral laws that would apply to all. A division into castes, whatever may be its defects, is essential to the smooth running of every society. If, as a consequence of ill‑considered intermingling, a society no longer has these distinct categories, they will tend to re‑form, slowly but inevitably, just as a wound heals over: the social framework is its own healer. According to the Manu Smriti, the codified laws of Manu, abilities and talents should then be the basis on which to reestablish castes. There is a similar idea behind the modern I.Q. tests. However, we do not have the established corporate bodies that could make these abilities productive and provide a way of life, security, and a social family for those oriented toward a particular vocation. All this is crucial for the well‑being of any society. The Western world's vanity (the implicit belief by which Westerners consider themselves a superior species) is revealed in its determination to impose upon all peoples its languages, beliefs, and social and moral concepts, in the belief that these represent progress. Those attached to Indian culture liken themselves to the Aryan Brahmans, whose rites they pretend to practice and whose codes of behavior they claim to follow. This has cut them off from the other brands of Indian tradition. The study of Shaiva tradition has been neglected to the point that most of the Westerners who claim to study India and its rites, customs, and knowledge have not even the slightest idea that there are other strands besides Vedic Brahmanism, even though it is these strands which are most suited to their own needs. Why does a Westerner who, at home, would study architecture, medicine, music, or perhaps astrology, alchemy, or magic, ignore the related fields which in India carry on similar traditions, with their particular initiations and rites, and which continue to teach the related religious and philosophic concepts? The few Westerners who have really been able to enter the Hindu world are those who have taken an interest in the study of the crafts (music in particular) and have been accepted into an artisanal group. Others, in investigating religious or magical practices, have been able to find a place for themselves in the Tantric world that has opened before them. Such was the case of Sir John Woodroffe for Tantrism or Verrier Elwyn for the Munda tribes. There are no exclusions in Shaivism and Tantrism concerning religious and ritual practices. Tiruvallur, the author of the Kural, the most venerated work in Tamil literature, was of very humble origins. He wrote: "All men are equal. The differences between them come about through their occupations . . . . Even today, a pariah who has undergone the Shaiva initiation (Shivädikshâ) can transmit it to 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
 Then,
  a couple of weeks later, the subject comes up again,
  this time in a parody article, and the response to 
  it is a bunch of followup discussions that are basic-
  ally arguments about the relative political correct-
  ness of the parody's humor...nary a word on the 
  subject of the  parody itself.
 
 Like so many other good, worthy and interesting points. So is your
 point that the group is filled with dullards, slackers, apathetic
 skimmers, etc.?

Heads up: The *only* reason Barry decided it was
important to discuss the caste system is because he
saw an opportunity to dump on me (and you) for *not*
discussing it.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing TO DISCUSS SUBSATANCE.

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   
Well, I can't play bait and switch, musical chairs here. I 
gave my comments about MMY defined caste system. You clearly 
mean some thing else -- but it is not defined. I am not going 
to argue abstraact labels...
   
   I'm not going to argue, period. I asked what you
   thought about the caste system, you answered.
   
   End of story.
  
  Ah, the discussion MUST conform to Barry's way of wishing it to go.
  
  Its my football (thread) so you gotta play by my rules or I 
  am going to take my football home.
  
  It seems to me you apitomize many characteristics of the 
  caste system that you appear to dispise.
 
 Whatever.
 
 From my point of view, you're bored and are trying
 to start an argument.
 
 I'm not bored, and am avoiding the argument.
 
 I think I've got the better deal...  :-)

I am not trying to start an argument. I am responding to your call for
substantive discussion. 

I don't have a POV onthe topic. I offered a few observations. I think
you raised a good point -- people do feel uncomfortable with the
topic. Not because many are TM TB's but because most of us have some
interests and connections to India and Indian culture and caste system
is a bit of a puzzle. Does it have any redeemng qualities is a fair
and good question for discussion,IMO. 

That you do not care to discuss a question that you raised is quite
odd, but I have come to expect that from you. And your absence from
the discussion is bound to raise it to a higher level, absent your
strong tendency to mischaracterize other's positons and imput
dastardly motives for anyone exploring a  position differing from yours.

So thanks for raising the topic. And thanks for having the good sense
of not participating and polluting it (with the above).







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
At any rate, the shows you mention, partly because
they're *shows*, are all in pretty much a different
category than a piece of writing in which a group is
demeaned without ever showing the group's positive side.
   
   Well South Park -- from what I have seen of it, pretty much 
demans
   everyone -- does not show a positive side when doing so --  and 
is
   hilarious.
  
  I don't watch South Park, but I don't have any
  argument with your thesis that if a comedy demeans
  *everybody*, it's not bigoted.  But that is a different
  point than the one I was making.
 
 Well as I understood you, you made a distinction between a comedian
 or forum that pokes barbs at everyone (all agreed its ok) and when 
 such becomes demeaning of a particular groups -- even its all groups
 (overtime). I was responding to the demeaing part of your arguemnt.

No, I never said that, sorry.  To the contrary, I
said I couldn't recall The Onion ever having demeaned
Jews as a group or blacks as a group or Muslims as a
group.  You said you thought you recalled pieces along
those lines but couldn't come up with any and brought
forth a list of sitcoms and movies instead.

Then I said (above) written satirical pieces and sitcoms/
movies are in different categories--and then you cited
South Park, which was a non sequitur as far as I can
tell.

One other point: When the unattractive characteristic
is actually harmful, there's a lot more basis for
holding it up to ridicule.  The caste system in
India is clearly harmful.  I've heard the veneration of
cows criticized as harmful--can't recall the reasons--but
among the world's evils, it doesn't seem like such a
big deal.  And what on earth is harmful about cooking
over a fire?

Those two were just plain gratuitous, suggesting that
Indians are basically uncivilized.  Of course these
things would be harmful *on a plane*, but nobody actually
brings cows on a plane or tries to do their cooking over
a fire on a plane.

If they'd wanted to keep it consistent and inoffensive
while still criticizing the caste system, they'd have
thought of something that lower-caste people tend to
do on planes that *isn't* harmful but is disdained by
the higher castes, so that the criticism remained
focused on those who are scornful of the lower castes,
not those who are the object of the scorn.
   
   I think its pretty clear (to me) that if you tried your hand at
   writing comedy, it would be political correct, inoffensive, and 
   not funny.
  
  I don't think I ever claimed to be a comedy writer,
  actually.  But if a good comedy writer attempted what
  I suggested, I suspect the result could very well be
  inoffensive but quite funny (maybe not politically
  correct--that's a whole 'nother can of worms).
  
I'm sure it wasn't intended to be bigoted, it was just
not well thought out.
   
   My take on the two lines you found offensive in the piece are
   different from yours. Why you don't find the satire (I didn't 
   say high satire) in the piece -- ridiculing stereotypes -- by 
   making such extreme and silly, is a bit mystifying.
  
  Where exactly did I say I didn't find the satire
  in the piece?  I said to the contrary several times.
  I laughed out loud at the burlap bag bit.
 
 OK. But now Iam getting confused on your point.
  
  I can't see where you actually addressed the points I
  made regarding those two lines and why they stuck out
  from the rest of the piece.  
 
 As above, I thought you were saying that when a particular group is
 demeaned its inappropriate. I countered (over several posts) that
 while I agree that if the demeaining is limited to a particular 
 group -- for example, good ol' boys in the south in the 50's, 60's 
 with racial jokes, or the boys club in corp america in 70's-90's 
 with women jokes, then thats a social stratifying power thing. But 
 if the demeaning is broad-based its fair game. 

This is now so utterly confused and far from my 
original point that it's not worth trying to
straighten out.

 Instead you set up a couple
  of straw men to knock down.
 
 Not on purpose. I have tried to address your points as I understood 
 them.

You didn't address any of them.  And you came up with
yet another straw man above.

Finis.  If you aren't going to debate in good faith,
forget it.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing to take a stand?, close

2006-04-15 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
  no_reply@ wrote:
  
   That it [the Onion article] was an effective satire 
   [of the caste system] is obvious. Case closed.
  
  Well, since I'm not bound to live my life the way you
  think I should, I'll reopen it, in its own thread.  :-)
 
 My wording was not well-crafted. I did not mean to imply that the
 thread or topic should be closed -- but rather we are not 
obligated to
 discuss something you feel we should (was the satire effective), 
and
 ignore all others (the different types of satire)  -- because you 
deem
 them diversions. 
 
 But since you raise the topic in its OWN thread, well that changes
 everything. :)
 
  I honestly believe that a lot of folks here ARE
  uncomfortable with the subject of the caste system
  coming up on this forum. And I think that the reason 
  they're uncomfortable with this is that Maharishi 
  *clearly* believes in it and supports it, and they're 
  *embarrassed* by the fact that he believes in it.
 
 Well MMY says a lot of things that an employee and tight, close
 follower would and should feel uncomfortable with. Thats why a lot 
of
 people who were such, are no longer (close followers). I think the
 latter is a much larger group here, and in the world, is much 
larger
 that the former. So when you say a lot of people, its a bit odd 
to
 me --  its a relatively small group.
  
  Only a couple of weeks ago, someone posted a long
  quote of Maharishi's in which he not only supported
  the concept of the caste system, 
 
 The BIG question is how various parties are defining the 
LABEL caste
 system. I think there are many different connotations and
 implications for the same word. Without clearly defining the what 
the
 words caste system means to then, people are discussing apples 
and
 oranges. Or apples and fish.
 
 In his MMY high level way -- a la its easier for people to learn 
the
 craft, business or professon of thier family -- and then they have
 more time for spiritual stuff. Thats basically HIS definition. He
 didn't say anything or support social discrimination, sub-castes, 
or
 even inter-caste marriage (which the vedas allow -- with 
guidelines).
 
I tend to agree with anon on this one. What I recall of Maharishi 
saying about caste was just that, that society operates most 
efficiently when family dharmas are maintained. 

Does this provide huge potential for abuse? Of course. Look what has 
happened both in India and Britain where the class/caste system is 
used not to promote the well being of society, but to 'keep people 
in their place'. Really damaging stuff.

On the other hand, what MMY is talking about in a practical way is 
really just common sense, that someone coming from a family of 
writers for example, may encounter a great difficulty in becoming an 
Indy 500 race car driver.  





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Caste System...anyone willing TO DISCUSS SUBSTANCE.

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff

Here are some links to provide some background and different POVs.


http://www.brookings.edu/views/articles/toch/19991201.htm

http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdisplay.aspx?cid=6

http://www.genome.org/cgi/content/full/11/6/931

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/10/11/news/dalit.php

http://www.bioethics.umn.edu/genetics_and_identity/case.html

http://www.colaco.net/1/caste.htm

http://www.answers.com/topic/caste

http://www.aliciapatterson.org/APF2101/Wells/Wells.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_Archaeogenetics_of_South_Asia

http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2005/04/20050426_b_main.asp

https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/pi/pitchappan_profile.html

http://www.dalitstan.org/holocaust/invasion/histgene.html

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0226169634/104-1423200-8312725?v=glancen=283155

http://wps.prenhall.com/ca_ph_macionis_sociology_5/0,9516,1544047-content,00.html

http://www.freeessays.cc/db/26/hsz102.shtml

http://www.friesian.com/caste.htm 

http://www.csuchico.edu/~cheinz/syllabi/asst001/spring98/india.htm

http://adaniel.tripod.com/castes.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system

http://www.english.emory.edu/Bahri/caste.html

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYZ/is_4_29/ai_95445135

http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Caste_System.htm

http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/21st/projects/GeneticDiversity/jorde.html







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 snip
 At any rate, the shows you mention, partly because
 they're *shows*, are all in pretty much a different
 category than a piece of writing in which a group is
 demeaned without ever showing the group's positive side.

Well South Park -- from what I have seen of it, pretty much 
 demans
everyone -- does not show a positive side when doing so --  and 
 is
hilarious.
   
   I don't watch South Park, but I don't have any
   argument with your thesis that if a comedy demeans
   *everybody*, it's not bigoted.  But that is a different
   point than the one I was making.
  
  Well as I understood you, you made a distinction between a comedian
  or forum that pokes barbs at everyone (all agreed its ok) and when 
  such becomes demeaning of a particular groups -- even its all groups
  (overtime). I was responding to the demeaing part of your arguemnt.
 
 No, I never said that, sorry.  

I am pretty sure you did in last nights posts. But maybe I misread
you. I don't have time to look for the quote

Regardless, you are clarified your position.

I
To the contrary, I
 said I couldn't recall The Onion ever having demeaned
 Jews as a group or blacks as a group or Muslims as a
 group.  You said you thought you recalled pieces along
 those lines but couldn't come up with any and brought
 forth a list of sitcoms and movies instead.
 
 Then I said (above) written satirical pieces and sitcoms/
 movies are in different categories--and then you cited
 South Park, which was a non sequitur as far as I can
 tell.

 
 One other point: When the unattractive characteristic
 is actually harmful, there's a lot more basis for
 holding it up to ridicule.  The caste system in
 India is clearly harmful.  I've heard the veneration of
 cows criticized as harmful--can't recall the reasons--but
 among the world's evils, it doesn't seem like such a
 big deal.  And what on earth is harmful about cooking
 over a fire?
 
 Those two were just plain gratuitous, suggesting that
 Indians are basically uncivilized.  Of course these
 things would be harmful *on a plane*, but nobody actually
 brings cows on a plane or tries to do their cooking over
 a fire on a plane.
 
 If they'd wanted to keep it consistent and inoffensive
 while still criticizing the caste system, they'd have
 thought of something that lower-caste people tend to
 do on planes that *isn't* harmful but is disdained by
 the higher castes, so that the criticism remained
 focused on those who are scornful of the lower castes,
 not those who are the object of the scorn.

I think its pretty clear (to me) that if you tried your hand at
writing comedy, it would be political correct, inoffensive, and 
not funny.
   
   I don't think I ever claimed to be a comedy writer,
   actually.  But if a good comedy writer attempted what
   I suggested, I suspect the result could very well be
   inoffensive but quite funny (maybe not politically
   correct--that's a whole 'nother can of worms).
   
 I'm sure it wasn't intended to be bigoted, it was just
 not well thought out.

My take on the two lines you found offensive in the piece are
different from yours. Why you don't find the satire (I didn't 
say high satire) in the piece -- ridiculing stereotypes -- by 
making such extreme and silly, is a bit mystifying.
   
   Where exactly did I say I didn't find the satire
   in the piece?  I said to the contrary several times.
   I laughed out loud at the burlap bag bit.
  
  OK. But now Iam getting confused on your point.
   
   I can't see where you actually addressed the points I
   made regarding those two lines and why they stuck out
   from the rest of the piece.  
  
  As above, I thought you were saying that when a particular group is
  demeaned its inappropriate. I countered (over several posts) that
  while I agree that if the demeaining is limited to a particular 
  group -- for example, good ol' boys in the south in the 50's, 60's 
  with racial jokes, or the boys club in corp america in 70's-90's 
  with women jokes, then thats a social stratifying power thing. But 
  if the demeaning is broad-based its fair game. 
 
 This is now so utterly confused and far from my 
 original point that it's not worth trying to
 straighten out.

There is confusion, it could be at many points of writing and
understanding. But good. Lets drop it.

 
  Instead you set up a couple
   of straw men to knock down.
  
  Not on purpose. I have tried to address your points as I understood  
  them.
 
 You didn't address any of them.  And you came up with
 yet another straw man above.

If you say so.It was not my intent. And I don't see it.
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
no_reply@ 
  wrote:
   Well as I understood you, you made a distinction between a 
comedian
   or forum that pokes barbs at everyone (all agreed its ok) and 
when 
   such becomes demeaning of a particular groups -- even its all 
groups
   (overtime). I was responding to the demeaing part of your 
arguemnt.
  
  No, I never said that, sorry.  
 
 I am pretty sure you did in last nights posts.

Nope, didn't.  I never disagreed that equal-opportunity
bashing was OK.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Air India Now Offers Business Caste Seating

2006-04-15 Thread anon_couscous_ff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff 
 no_reply@ 
   wrote:
Well as I understood you, you made a distinction between a 
 comedian
or forum that pokes barbs at everyone (all agreed its ok) and 
 when 
such becomes demeaning of a particular groups -- even its all 
 groups
(overtime). I was responding to the demeaing part of your 
 arguemnt.
   
   No, I never said that, sorry.  
  
  I am pretty sure you did in last nights posts.
 
 Nope, didn't.  I never disagreed that equal-opportunity
 bashing was OK.


Fine. But that is not the point I was saying I understood you to be
making last night. Perhaps I misread you. 

So since we are in a huge web of miscommunication here, lets move on
to other,perhaps more interesting topics.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Heresies

2006-04-15 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In a message dated 4/14/06 6:28:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 Ok. I  see your initial question and this response as basically a 
nit-
 pick  regarding my original post. No big deal- we'll see what 
happens 
 soon  enough...
 
 
 
 Nit Pick? You may see it that way, but I saw a serious  allegation 
of the 
 United States providing arms, including chemical weapons,  to 
Saddam, to use 
 against Iran, which was not true or at least not proven to be  
true. The only 
 thing Saddam got from the United States of real military value  
was Satellite 
 intelligence. Russia and France have provided the overwhelming  
majority of 
 Saddam's military weaponry. But if anybody has any real proof,  
documented proof, 
 that the US supplied Iraq with Gas or chemical weapon, I'll be  
happy to read it.

Fair enough, but the real issue I was addressing was a poster's 
contention that we had been turning the other cheek with regard to 
Iran, which has NOT been the case... Funny how that was overlooked.





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





  1   2   >