[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and > > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't > > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API. > > How is it different to

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Friday, 5. June 2009 21:59:46 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well, > > it's not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral, > > and relying on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is > >

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:49:42 Ian Clarke wrote: > Its only a bugtracker. If they were to suddenly go evil (which they > have no incentive to do) then it would be an annoyance, but not a > disaster - we'd just move elsewhere. When we take a look at the current search for a new solution, I

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote: > >> Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the > >> site) > > > > No. :| > > Yes it is, its free for open source projects, see > http://sera.lighthouseapp.com/plans That's gratis but not libre, so it isn't free.

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 03:22:13 steve wrote: > As others have pointed out, we're only talking about a bug tracker, at most > it is an annoyance and not a threat to the projects security A bugtracker is _very close_ to a development dependency. How much time did we now spend with searching for a

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

On Monday, 8. June 2009 05:44:58 Ian Clarke wrote: > > And no matter how nice these people are, do you trust their strengths of > > principles not to stab our back when they get threatened, if their > > principles aren't even strong enough to make their project free software? > > What if it isn't

[freenet-dev] Trying to move forward on getting rid of emu

Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 12:10:39 schrieb Florent Daigniere: > No way. Bugzilla is everything but usable in our case. OK. So it's Trac (with complex import but DVCS integration), Mantis (which some don't like) or an unfree solution. Did I miss one? I didn't yet include roundup, because I only

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel: > I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much > about the underlying software. To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend. That way has a few

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Okay. The homepage now says: > ' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse > and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship. > Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely

[freenet-dev] The new blue gradient website background

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 02:06:06 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > Blue Gradient background won't work, because: But it looked very nice to me, and I could read the text quite well... --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free

[freenet-dev] About the website

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771: > Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites) This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a freesite and a normal website).

[freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng: > The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture. > > Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default. Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks. Wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

[freenet-dev] Looking for a working Eclipse git plugin

Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbackde at googlemail.com: > If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using > my prefered IDE, > then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you > decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command

[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes) > > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online > games? Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in Gnutella) or with graphics editing or

[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes) > > I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run > nodes at work perhaps? Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard

[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes) > > > > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online > > games? > > O

[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do > that! Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly doesn't work really well for memory consumption. I'd like an option to

[freenet-dev] Infocalypse feedback (Mercurial over Freenet)

Hi, I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right place, since it's an application on freenet. I tried it a bit and I really like it. I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the smaller repositories I tested (which are also

[freenet-dev] Infocalypse feedback (Mercurial over Freenet)

On Monday, 11. May 2009 22:24:48 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > The mirror of freenet staging worked, too. > > > > The initial pull took about an hour, and it succeeded, though I got the > > log output "GetFailed". > > Most recent revision was 13919 > > user:Daniel Cheng (???) > > date:

[freenet-dev] Request for proofreading: Announcing donation from Google

On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this > year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work, > and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not > yet

[freenet-dev] a social problem with Wot (was: Hashcash introduction, was: Question about WoT )

On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote: > In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever > message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship.. > but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even > if majority abuse the

[freenet-dev] Question about an important design decision of the WoT plugin

On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by > spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the > users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who > trust

[freenet-dev] Request for proofreading: Announcing donation from Google

On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote: > On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new > >> feature >

[freenet-dev] Current uservoice top 5

On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some > background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be > kept minimal... That would be great. As long as it doesn't access its memory

[freenet-dev] Question about an important design decision of the WoT plugin

On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Voting not on users but on messages (objects): Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much their votes correspond with yours. If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up)

[freenet-dev] Infocalypse feedback (Mercurial over Freenet)

On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central > config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while > the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the issue). This prob

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote: > Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth > connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for > routing requests if possible? I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can > choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for > this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux. But in Gentoo it

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

Hi, It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the internet). I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

On Sunday, 17. May 2009 00:59:13 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via > MDNSDiscovery! ...you're right for OpenNet... should have seen that before. I assume only a full "steganographic announcement" framework could help there

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: >use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this > idea. I just added the mailbody as comment :) Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part

[freenet-dev] Usability test results

On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a > useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use > exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens, > when the selected

[freenet-dev] Using standard ports of encrypted protocols

On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like > these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between > nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is > purely peer

[freenet-dev] Why WoTs won't work....

On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote: > I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could > help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list, > this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't > want to see these posts again

[freenet-dev] Why current ui may be improved, and proposed improvements

On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:38:35 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Putting the messages only here is a bad idea. Some of these messages are > IMPORTANT. What we need to do is: - show the summary on the Browse Freenet > page and maybe others > - reduce the number of messages by coalescing them and shifting

[freenet-dev] Why current ui may be improved, and proposed improvements

On Saturday, 23. May 2009 02:20:23 Cl?ment wrote: > > > A always seeable (sorry for new words...) button 'Shutdown the node' > > > and 'Restart the node' > > > > You want to encourage people to shut down? IMHO the best way to do that > > is with a system tray icon. > > Hum, in all application you

[freenet-dev] Why WoTs won't work....

On Saturday, 23. May 2009 16:06:51 Matthew Toseland wrote: > People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who > should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is > spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former, > no? Not if

[freenet-dev] Why current ui may be improved, and proposed improvements

On Saturday, 23. May 2009 20:03:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Well, no other alert is shown in full at the moment. > > Isn't it better to just say "You have 5 messages from friends" ? Or "You > have 1 new messages from friends" ? I'm not perfectly sure, but I think it would suffice. Maybe I

[freenet-dev] Why current ui may be improved, and proposed improvements

On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote: > Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to establish > darknet connections. Maybe we should even write something about Freenet > becoming faster with more friend connections - if that's true?

[freenet-dev] The installer is NOT signed

On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daigni?re wrote: > And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better > way to get feedback from users. Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface? Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text

[freenet-dev] Why current ui may be improved, and proposed improvements

On Tuesday, 26. May 2009 19:16:14 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Sunday 24 May 2009 17:30:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote: > > > Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to > > > establish darknet connec

[freenet-dev] Question about an important design decision of the WoT plugin

On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 19:53:01 Evan Daniel wrote: > I have only very rarely had any difficulty determining whether a > message was spam or not. Why would this be any different? > > Of course Advogato gives you the same ability, that is the entire > point. The precise algorithm is different,

[freenet-dev] Getting rid of emu: an option

On Saturday, 30. May 2009 19:41:24 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Emu is constantly segfaulting in php-cgi, this is one reason to want to > move. It would be partly solved by making it all static. What exactly is needed? I have some 2GiB diskspace and unknown bandwidth laying unused (I grabbed a

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Hi, A few years back I wrote freenet-cards which you can give your friends so they can easily check your node-ref. For a long time these lived only on a freesite, but I just pushed them on a normal website to help spread freenet. -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ Please use them as you

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 21:32:36 schrieb Robert Hailey: > > -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/ > I really like the *idea*, but I wish it were easier to implement. It > would be a pain to enter that huge noderef by hand. ... > freenet://192.168.0.128:4567/14/xYaEue344 ... > Couldn't we

[freenet-dev] Freenet-Cards: ID cards with your node-ref

Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:02:52 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist: > There was a proposal more than a couple of years ago to create poems for > the node reference. In fact there were two source-ready versions posted > on this list. They would be way too long to put on a business card, but >

[freenet-dev] Future of disk encryption in Freenet?

On Sunday 01 August 2010 12:14:51 Ximin Luo wrote: > So yes we should just drop "physical security". To do it properly we'll > have to fuck with parts of people's machines we really shouldn't be > fucking with; and if they are that paranoid (I am) they should just > encrypt their entire disks,

[freenet-dev] New server, current status of services

Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010 21:34:47 schrieb Cl?ment Vollet: > last one is six months old); and by news, I don't mean a news about a > switch of server like I suggested above, but news about the life of the > project (development, new plugins, tech stuff, etc.). Maybe the users > won't understand

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1477

CryptNode writes: > I was able to verify this build. Log file > https://cryptnode.org/temp/verify-1477.log Verify instructions > https://github.com/freenet/scripts Thank you! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken signature.asc

[freenet-dev] Should we accept Flattr?

I think Flattr is a great way to support websites. For freenet it might be useful, because Freenet is often in the news and so people who just like the idea can give their support. I use it on my sites. It is neither free software, nor anonymous, though. Best wishes, Arne

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:35:41 Matthew Toseland wrote: > Plus, ideally we'd like Freenet to support multiple logins. That would be cool! Then we could add real gateways to WoT, creating a decentral, anonymizing (as long as you can trust your gateway) social network. ?getting even more

[freenet-dev] Idea for marketing, related to GSoC student decision

On Tuesday 19 April 2011 19:22:09 Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 18 Apr 2011 15:49:50 xor wrote: > > IF we get a decent new web interface done which integrates all of those, > > we could make a theme which completely looks like Facebook and then do > > a major press release which claims

[freenet-dev] Hello

Hi Zurc, Welcome to Freenet! Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2011, 14:17:22 schrieb Zurc: > I can imagine it takes quite a bit of processing to figure out which of > those ten computers had the furry porn because the cache on each of the > computers is 30ish gig big, so thats 300 gigabytes worth of

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Montag, 29. August 2011, 14:32:13 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Yes, small tweaks have worked so well for us for the last decade, leaving us > pretty-much where we were in 2003. No, we don't understand how the current > system works, there is no point in trying to fix something when we don't > even

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

t; efficiency cost, and would probably make load management more difficult. > > I apologise if you see this as rather a broadside after I encouraged you to > analyse the problem, but it is not yet a convincing demonstration that > queueing is a viable strategy and not the spawn of satan! :)

[freenet-dev] Queueing doesn't use any bandwidth was Re: Beyond New Load Management

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 12:32:17 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Regardless, even if queueing doesn't use additional bandwidth or CPU > resources, it also doesn't use any less of these resources - so it doesn't > actually help to alleviate any load (unless it results in a timeout in which > case it

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 01:08:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > 5) solution: count each SSK as only > average_SSK_success_rate * data_to_transfer_on_success. Some more data: chances of having at least this many successful transfers for 40 SSKs with a mean success rate

[freenet-dev] Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 13:25:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Tuesday 30 Aug 2011 21:02:54 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > what this means: if a SSK has a mean success rate of 0.16, then using > > 0.25 as value makes sure that 95% of the possible cases don?t exhaust > &

[freenet-dev] Offer to help with Windows installer

Am Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011, 22:21:17 schrieb Jeff Rivett: > Greetings. According to the wiki > (http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/Status): "Windows installer - > We could do with a more active maintainer, and we definitely need more > testers (with different windows versions) for it." > > If

[freenet-dev] [RFC] Allow more people to release a Freenet build

Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 16:26:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Wednesday 14 Dec 2011 18:15:42 David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > > I?m not quite sure how to respond to this as I have received NO > > INFORMATION WHATSOEVER about what ?make a test build? actually entails. > > Do we have a build

[freenet-dev] Freenet Wikipedia page

Am Samstag, 17. Dezember 2011, 17:36:48 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 16 Dec 2011 05:44:06 Ian Clarke wrote: > > There are some issues raised at the top of Freenet's wikipedia page: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet > > > > It would be good if we could address some of these

[freenet-dev] Freenet Wikipedia page

Am Sonntag, 18. Dezember 2011, 12:38:56 schrieb Luke R.: > No one added TIME Magazine article cited source? For shame... > Don't worry I fixed it. :) I also found this guys blog: > http://onemansblog.com/2007/05/15/privacy-equals-freedom-support-the-freenet > -project/ Great! Did you link to it?

[freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 22:47:47 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > - I think that trust system of FMS is better than WoT. You have the > > opportunity to divide trust to person and his opinion to other persons > > (I > > think it's really important to divide this things). And what changes are

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

Hi, I created a mockup for a freenet theme. My main goal was getting the structure out of the way of the content, so I went for a horizontal menu with horizontal submenu (persistent) all done with CSS for performance and cleanlyness :) The rest is done with the theme ?into the rabbit hole? in

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 09:01:28 Daniel Kanaan wrote: > Nice clean theme. Thanks! -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 316 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL:

[freenet-dev] Mockup for a freenet theme: rabbit hole

On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36:14 Volodya wrote: > I had some issues with the menu. Sometimes when you hover over the menu and > submenu opens it is tricky to move the mouse in the way that doesn't close > the submenu. Is it better now? I increased the active area. > - Volodya >

[freenet-dev] Call for seednodes and explanation of current problems

On Saturday 05 February 2011 18:39:49 Matthew Toseland wrote: > We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you > can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably > static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth >

[freenet-dev] Most users drop out before the first-time wizard is finished

Update: We worked a bit on the first time user experience. Reasoning: Only 1 choice at startup: default setting or wizard. ? http://piratepad.net/H3kOp3QXuV Current version, without the text markup: 3 scenarios: - With invite. Can stay darknet or enable opennet as well for better

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Monday 14 February 2011 09:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: > I may remember this incorrectly, but I think when I tried out freenet, it's > a desktop application, and not a localhost http service, right? Freenet is a localhost http-service. I already used it remotely quite often by just

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

On Thursday 10 March 2011 19:06:46 Michiel de Jong wrote: > Still, since you're already distributing the web app, i don't see so much > added advantage in separating the app from the data (which is what unhosted > is all about). it makes sense to put javascript into freenet extension, but > not so

[freenet-dev] [GSOC2011] Transport plugins and steganography

Hi Andrea, On Saturday 12 March 2011 12:22:22 mambro wrote: > do you still consider a good GSOC project the implementation of transport > plugins to make freenet to run over TCP (and maybe HTTP) and to implement > some steganography techniques to hide the traffic from network analyzers? I do

[freenet-dev] Greetings Freenet Devs

On Sunday 29 May 2011 21:29:22 Tom Elovi Spruce wrote: > 2. Creating a free web publishing platform for everyone. This way, you can > convince people to be part of the opennet and get more nodes. Maybe this > will lead to having the opennet "feel" just as responsive as the typical > client-server

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405

Sounds great! Many Thanks! Am Dienstag, 15. November 2011, 20:03:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Freenet 0.7.5 build 1405 is now available. Please upgrade. There are many > changes, mostly client layer or FCP or filtering stuff from FMS. > Highlights: - Allow plugins to exempt themselves from

[freenet-dev] One click solution

Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011, 20:03:37 schrieb Volodya: > On 10/09/2011 06:34 PM, Dirk Bruere wrote: > > What I am looking for is a one click solution ie someone goes to our > > site, click a link, and then if they approve the installation it all > > goes ahead with a browser icon on the desktop

[freenet-dev] Filesharing application for Freenet

Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 23:58:13 schrieb Tanya Pyatigorskaya: > Now I am back, and I am happy to be able to continue my work > on my Freenet task. Welcome back! > Since I was out of the day-to-day work in the community for quite a long > period of time, what I need now is to become up to

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1401

Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011, 17:02:16 schrieb xor: > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 15:05:59 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I believed I had seriously screwed > > everything up and wasted 6 months' work at the same time; > > Don't be that strict with yourself. Even if the code isn't of much use

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland amphibian.dyndns.org > > wrote: > > > > WE NEED MORE DATA. > > Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to > fix unless we are extremely fortuitous,

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > very simple check to see if my understanding is right. > > > > Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests, > > the bandwidth

[freenet-dev] How to gather more data was Re: Beyond New Load Management: A proposal

Hi, At Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:53:58 +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a > > > very simple check to see if my understanding is ri

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1404 (BIG FIX)

Am Montag, 12. September 2011, 12:38:49 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > Thanks for using Freenet, and thanks for not leaving while the bugs get > sorted out. Thank you for sorting out the bugs! And while we?re at it: As I pledged, I just donated 50? of the money I got back because I cannot go to

[freenet-dev] Usability and functionality

Am Dienstag, 3. April 2012, 18:43:51 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > From > http://127.0.0.1:8889/USK at > X1LyFuoMhnKY7KLK5-RBQ3IHtNJLAUSV~IjzRuxi6Kw,x9otzn > rH7Y8R42TzfAqDHv5Fda2ojIhqJw7iPRzimz8,AQACAAE/Volodya/28/ > > > Old friends coming back, freenet is moving > > Some friends that i've

[freenet-dev] webui and accessibility

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012, 14:48:08 schrieb Nicolas Hernandez: > Yes i know. But we are working about accessibility for > developpers too ! > > >- Velocity for templating >- html+jsp for site rendering >- gwt+nonjs for components and components rendering How does

[freenet-dev] Download button for new site

Am Sonntag, 5. August 2012, 06:26:59 schrieb Luke R.: > Here's two test images I am proposing - > http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/7980/path4551.png <-- Colorful Box (used > for NewYears?) http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/6945/path4552.png <-- > Regular Box I like the second one, but both look

[freenet-dev] Freenet security setup redesign v2

Am Sonntag, 12. August 2012, 18:49:33 schrieb Ian Clarke: > I like the overall look but I'm just not sure about the toggle switches, I > think they create unnecessary potential for confusion. You just don't see > them used in web pages very often. Same for me. They suggest to me, that I can

[freenet-dev] Download button for new site

Am Dienstag, 7. August 2012, 11:42:12 schrieb Fabio Gonzalez: > Because Freenet does not ask the person to move the mouse, or write > something on the keyboard? Oh yes, it does? On my new homeserver my /dev/random gets emptied out very quickly, so freenet takes ages to get its startup random

[freenet-dev] bootID damaged, how to fix?

Hi tia, Can you just rename the bootID file? Best wishes, Arne Am Dienstag, 14. August 2012, 09:05:45 schrieb Maurizio Boriani: > Hi, > I got this in log file, how to fix? ? -- Konstruktive Kritik: - http://draketo.de/licht/krude-ideen/konstruktive-kritik -- next part

[freenet-dev] GSoC 2012

Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2012, 12:32:14 schrieb Ian Clarke: > I'm not sure whether people would object to this, but I would quite like to > mentor a student to work on Tahrir under the umbrella of the Freenet > project. > > Thoughts? Opinions? Insults? I personally think it would only be

[freenet-dev] Heavy WebOfTrust optimization almost done

Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:09:21 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > What actually happens is it looks up the index for both of the identities, > and intersects them. Technically this is O(n) but it is only really slow > when one of them (the in-set for an identity and the out-set for another >

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

Am Freitag, 17. Februar 2012, 00:41:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > > I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within > > freenet, so taking down github will not stop freenet. > Yes but does it w

[freenet-dev] Freenet Revival?

Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 10:08:18 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Anyone familiar with this (if you don't speak French you'll need Google > Translate): > > https://sites.google.com/site/freenetrevivaltaskforce/home No, but it sounds good. And I think we can help them with information. Best wishes,

[freenet-dev] Freenet Revival?

Am Freitag, 20. Januar 2012, 16:14:46 schrieb Michael Grube: > Somewhat related, myself and some people at the local hackerspace are > getting involved in evaluating what Freenet has vs what we'd like to see, > then going out and implementing it. Very cool! Please keep us posted! Best wishes,

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

Well, my take is that with SOPA/PIPA coming today and Megaupload busted and Wikipedia taking a stand for the open web and against censorship, our relentless promotion of freenet over the last few months seems to have taken hold. People are realizing that freenet still exists and has already

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote: > > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past week: > > ... > > Could all of this be due to the attention around SOPA? > > > > Ian. > > well, i see the

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600, Robert Hailey wrote: > > > On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: > > > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that. > > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-) > > And then we should push

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:08 -0500, Juiceman wrote: > Could we at least get an update on the front page that is newer than 13th > April 2011 please? If I didn't know better I would think this project was > abandoned... > Maybe a link to somewhere advising folks to read up on SOPA or other >

[freenet-dev] Website traffic increased substantially

Am Dienstag, 24. Januar 2012, 14:34:57 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide: > At Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:21:05 +0100, > > Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: > > On Monday 23 January 2012 07:15:07 Ian Clarke wrote: > > > Our website traffic appears to have tripled over the past wee

[freenet-dev] Some Updates on Winterface

Hi Pouyan, Thanks for getting us up to date! I just updated the plugin, and it looks partially functional, now. - A nice idea would be to get the patch for jar loader included in freenet as soon as possible! Currently the list of bookmarks looks very hectic and the cathegories are missing.

[freenet-dev] webui and accessibility

Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 13:40:56 schrieb Ian Clarke: > Yes, the vast number of people that refuse to use anything but Lynx? There > is RMS, who are the other ones? So far as I know RMS doesn't use Freenet > so we don't have to worry about him. I regularly browse freenet with a raw text

[freenet-dev] webui and accessibility

Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 15:29:45 schrieb Ian Clarke: > > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly > > shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some > > sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or > > there is no

[freenet-dev] webui and accessibility

Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2012, 22:14:39 schrieb Thomas Sachau: > So what is the experience of new users? Install freenet, see automaticly > shipped wot+freetalk, try them, see their issues, maybe browse some > sites and uninstall freenet again, since things either do rarely work or > there is no

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >