On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 07:55:26 UTC, drug wrote:
09.03.2018 18:38, Adam D. Ruppe пишет:
Now also on dub:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/arsd-official%3Ananovega
Hasn't somebody started porting nanogui
(https://github.com/wjakob/nanogui)? I'd like to do it, but
don't want to duplicate
On 5/28/16 4:23 AM, Seb wrote:
On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 19:18:11 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 17:32:06 UTC, André wrote:
[...]
Hello André,
Congratulations. Job well done on a much need resource for the
community. I sent you an email almost two weeks ago via your
On Monday, 16 May 2016 at 17:32:06 UTC, André wrote:
Hi,
after another round of polishing, bug fixing, very useful user
contributions and suggestions, I'd like to present the new home
of the D language online tour:
http://tour.dlang.org/
Thank you very much to the D foundation for hosting
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 10:53:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-01-25 07:39, Andrew Edwards wrote:
I truly doubt that. It would be truly amazing if that were to
occur but
history has proven otherwise. The sentiment was expressed so
many times
that Walter was finally moved
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 20:44:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-01-25 14:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Glad to see your spirit is not easily broken. That, however,
does not
invalidate my statement. One would think that 10 years after
being
dubbed the official graphics library
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 03:21:51 UTC, Puming wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 02:37:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Hot off the press! http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2016H1 --
Andrei
[snip]
For tooling, I suggest a look at GUI/IDEs, now that
dlangui/dlangide seems a good
On Monday, 13 July 2015 at 22:03:42 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 10:10:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-07-12 02:29, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note, the current packaging format is incompatible with with
OSX 10.11
(El Capitan). No previous release of DMD can
On Sunday, 12 July 2015 at 10:10:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-07-12 02:29, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note, the current packaging format is incompatible with with
OSX 10.11
(El Capitan). No previous release of DMD can be installed via
the dmg
files available on downloads.dlang.org
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 23:14:05 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.068.0 release.
http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2.x/2.068.0/
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/
Also available on Travis-CI as dmd-2.068.0-b1.
A changelog containing all the upcoming changes will be
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 at 21:26:20 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/555471499893944323
They're available through May 12, but the number of rooms
reserved is reserved and first-come-first-served, so book soon.
Many thanks to Chuck Allison for
The second release candidate for v2.066.1 is now available for
testing. Binaries may be obtained at
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing/. Happy testing.
DMD 2.066.1-rc1 is now available for testing. Visit
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing to download. Please submit all bugs
to bugzilla at https://issues.dlang.org/.
Happy testing
On 9/12/14, 3:20 AM, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2014 01:51:33 +0900
schrieb Andrew Edwards rid...@yahoo.com:
DMD 2.066.1-rc1 is now available for testing. Visit
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing to download. Please submit all bugs
to bugzilla at https://issues.dlang.org/.
Happy
On 9/12/14, 3:28 AM, Marco Leise wrote:
P.S. Is this supposed to contain all 2.066 regression
fixes pulled into master up to this point?
As far as I can tell at least
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3961
from 4 days ago didn't get cherry picked yet.
Or are these RCs more of a
Hello all,
Binaries for beta 1 is available for download and testing. You can find
them at: http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
Test!!! Document bugs/regressions!!! Enjoy!!!
Thanks to those who have contributed to the maintenance/upkeep of the
wiki page. As I am no a full-time student with
On 8/23/14, 3:33 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/22/14, 10:05 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As I'm sure has been mentioned elsewhere, the website changes should be
part of the release process, not an afterthought.
Agreed. Who would like to volunteer being our webmaster? We'll discuss
with our
On 8/19/14, 7:42 PM, KrzaQ wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 19:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to everyone involved!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2dwqvy/d_2066_nogc_c_namespaces_multidimensional_slices/
On 8/20/14, 8:38 AM, safety0ff wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:18:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 18 August 2014 at 23:14:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it
yet another bug-fixing release.
Isn't this what
On 8/19/14, 1:26 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/18/14, 5:23 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 8/18/2014 7:14 PM, Dicebot wrote:
I also propose to start 2.067 beta branch right now and declare it yet
another bug-fixing release.
Seconded.
Well that's what happened - someone started 2.067.
DMD v2.066.0-rc2 binaries are available for testing:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
DMD v2.066.0-rc1 binaries are available for testing:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
DMD v2.066.0-b6 binaries are available for testing:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing
Note that Linux installers are not yet available due to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13210.
The v2.066.0-b5 binaries are now available:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DMD_v2.066.0-b5
H... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is
smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that.
Binaries are located here:
ALL
http://downloads.dlang.org/pre-releases/2014/dmd.2.066.0-b4.zip
FREEBSD
On Wednesday, 16 July 2014 at 04:56:14 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write
your
report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the
result
will be the same.
i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very
On 7/17/14, 2:09 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/16/14, 4:05 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
H... Seems copy and paste only works when the person doing it is
smart enough to do it correctly. Sorry about that.
Binaries are located here:
[snip]
Idea: how about pasting all of that stuff
On 7/17/14, 6:35 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
That actually have already prepared this for B5.
Actually, I have prepared this for B5.
The v2.066.0-b4 binaries are now available. The review period for beta 4
will run until 0700 UTC ( PDT, 0300 EDT, 1600 JST) on 21 July 2014,
at which time binaries for B5 will be produced and released. Due
diligence in identifying regressions as early as possible is requested
and
On Saturday, 12 July 2014 at 00:13:47 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
For convenience, the list of unresolved issues marked as
regressions:
https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=regressionresolution=---
Seems like there is still quite a way to go until we can
release RC1.
David
The v2.066.0-b3 binaries are now available. The review period for beta 3
will run until 0700 UTC ( PDT, 0300 EDT, 1600 JST) on 14 July 2014,
at which time binaries for RC1 will be produced and released. Due
diligence in identifying regressions as early as possible is requested
and
On 7/10/14, 2:35 AM, Bob wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 15:39:50 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 14:57:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
My concern is that this shouldn't compile in the first place. What is
xyz?, Is it a free function? Is it a member variable
On 7/9/14, 4:18 PM, Bob wrote:
Hi, I hit problem with templates/opDispatch.
http://pastebin.com/rc09yWNt
% uname -a
Linux machine 3.11.0-20-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 21:32:49 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
What does this event mean? Where does xyz come from? The code below
On 7/9/14, 5:58 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
On 7/9/14, 4:18 PM, Bob wrote:
Hi, I hit problem with templates/opDispatch.
http://pastebin.com/rc09yWNt
% uname -a
Linux machine 3.11.0-20-generic #35-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 2 21:32:49 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
What does this event mean
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:21:20 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 12:11:13 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
remove the string components parameter form opDispatch to
reveal the same error.
Hm, could you elaborate a bit further on this? As per the spec,
opDispatch
The v2.066.0-b2 binaries are now available. The review period will run until
0700 UTC ( PDT) 14 July 2014. Your assistance in identifying and reporting
bugs are
greatly appreciated.
Binaries are located here:
ALL
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.066.0-b2.zip
OSX
On 7/8/14, 11:16 PM, NCrashed . via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Also the link on main page is broken.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13080
On 7/8/14, 11:47 PM, NCrashed wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The v2.066.0-b2 binaries are now available. The review period will run
until 0700 UTC ( PDT) 14 July 2014. Your assistance in identifying
and reporting bugs are
greatly appreciated.
Link
On 7/8/14, 11:39 PM, John wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 10:38:52 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
If nothing is identified, I will abandon the idea of providing point
releases.
Managing multiple Alpha or Beta builds with a1, a2 .. or b1, b2 etc look
good.
Adding another point-number
All binaries are now posted. Following the updated links:
ALL
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.066.0-b1.zip
OSX
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.066.0-b1.osx.zip
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.066.0-b1.dmg
FREEBSD
On 7/5/14, 2:42 AM, klasbo wrote:
On Friday, 4 July 2014 at 01:13:24 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Your assistance in identifying and
reporting bugs are greatly appreciated.
Hi, Private here (ie neither Sergeant or Lieutenant, I enlisted to
post this).
Where do I pose the question Is X a bug
Encountering issues posting the 2.066.0-b1
A number of technical difficulties resulted in a delayed beta review.
The review period has commenced and will continue until 0700 UTC (
PDT) 14 July 2014. Your assistance in identifying and reporting bugs are
greatly appreciated.
Binaries are located here:
ALL
On 6/12/14, 8:31 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3655
Seems you missed a few:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/search?q=Artistic+Licenseref=cmdform
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant.
In my world a lieutenant is absolutely useless. Given the tutelage and
guidance of solid staff non-commissioned officer, some day they will
become productive members of the
On 6/11/14, 11:24 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 11 June 2014 14:19, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 6/11/14, 2:23 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I'll be there to test and bug report ! Thank for being the release
lieutenant
It is time to begin preparations for the next release of DMD. I am aim
for a two week beta release to commence on 30 June with branching of
2.066 and end on 7 July with the release of 2.066.0.
Concurrently with this release, I would like to produce a maintenance
release for 2.065. Please
On 6/10/14, 10:01 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
Please do not tag anything until we decide if virtual is a keyword in D.
See: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/584
The branch will not be created until 30 June. I trust that this will be
sorted out by then.
On 6/4/14, 2:37 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 18:14:22 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 18:03:48 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
clip
void main() {
var a = 10;
var b = 20;
b += a;
b -= 4;
import std.stdio;
On 5/27/14, 2:57 PM, w0rp wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself to educate others, and that D should focus on
behaviour which makes sense not only in a particular context, but with
respect to the other contexts. (Which is what C++ lacks
On 4/1/14, 3:01 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Hi everyone,
It is my great pleasure to announce a new feature addition to the tool
Digger.
Digger's goal is to be able to build D versions from any point in D's
history. As it has already conquered the present (building D from git
master) and past
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
Available binaries can be accessed at [2]. Since the website will lag
slightly behind, links are provided below for convenience.
All Systems:
On 2/24/14, 3:45 AM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete
descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
[1] http://dlang.org/chagelog.html
Correction: http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Note that this page is still
First I would like to say thanks to Martin Nowak, Kenji Hara, Jordi
Sayol and Brad Anderson for their support. Their efforts directly impact
my ability to prepare the releases and they work tirelessly to ensure
that it happens.
RC1 is available for review:
All Systems:
Following are the changes incorporated since beta 2:
DMD
Issue 10133 - ICE for templated static conditional lambda
Issue 11993 - typeof(this) in constraint of member function
template should reflect method qualifier
Issue 11447 - Closure provide bogus values
Issue 12016 -
Windows users, please give the new installer a try. It has been updated
to facilitate proper installation.
On 2/3/14, 1:14 PM, evilrat wrote:
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 23:38:56 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
We've made a lot of progress towards the 2.065 stable release.
Available binaries are as follows:
Windows
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.exe
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd
On 2/3/14, 1:34 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Binaries have been published:
Linux
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0-b3-0_i386.deb
Should be:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/libphobos2-65_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb
On 2/3/14, 2:12 PM, Rory McGuire wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/__dmd_2.065.0-b3-0_amd64.deb is 404 for me.
Linux
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0~b3-0_i386.deb
On 2/3/14, 5:29 PM, Meta wrote:
When installing on Windows, it lists the required space on disk as 0KB.
That's something we can work towards fixing. But does it install? Is it
working for you? Are you having any problems with it that needs to be
addressed?
On 1/26/14, 6:38 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: There are no RPMs available for Suse and Fedora at the moment.
They will be provided upon becoming available.
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0~b2-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0~b2-0
On Wednesday, 29 January 2014 at 06:33:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 at 23:38:56 UTC, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
Linux
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.linux.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0-b2-0_amd64.deb
http://ftp.digitalmars.com
On 1/26/14, 11:19 AM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 16:23, Dejan Lekic ha escrit:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 08:25:05 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 22/01/14 02:06, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit
On 1/26/14, 3:59 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Jordi, I need you to explain this. You wrote the scripts for the pkg
installers right? What happens when you pass a version number containing
a - to dmd_rpm.sh? I'll tell you:
Building for target platforms: i386
Building for target i386
On 1/26/14, 4:20 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 26/01/14 21:59, Andrew Edwards ha escrit:
Jordi, I need you to explain this. You wrote the scripts for the pkg installers right?
What happens when you pass a version number containing a - to dmd_rpm.sh?
I'll tell you:
Building for target
We've made a lot of progress towards the 2.065 stable release. Available
binaries are as follows:
All Systems
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.zip
FreeBSD
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0-b2.freebsd-32.zip
On 1/24/14, 9:17 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/23/2014 01:44 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
1) The link for nsisunz.zip per readme.txt does not work.
I wrote the author of the plugin.
He no longer has posses this file.
@Brad Anderson, maybe you or Walter still have a download laying around?
On 1/24/14, 10:04 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Could you please make a 2.065.b1 tag on the GitHub as well so we
finally start using the release naming scheme you mentioned in the
previous beta-release thread here on the NG?
2.065.b1 is not going to work for FreeBSD and Debian OSes. The tags will
On 1/23/14, 7:25 PM, vitaly_m wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
For a description of these packages, visit
http://dlang.org/downloads.html.
The link should be http://dlang.org/download.html (no 's' before
.html)
Thanks
On 1/22/14, 3:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-01-21 23:22, Andrew Edwards wrote:
ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.b1.dmg
The installer is old. The text contains links to D1. The content seem to
be correct though. How are you building the installer.
That might be the case. I'm
On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme for tags and
packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you as frustrated as
me?
I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent issues
with using the packaging
Due to building an packaging requirements and a need to address the
concerns of the community, I changed the naming convention for this and
all future releases.
The following is our new naming convention:
major.minor.qualifier
Examples follow:
#.###.b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# == 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# == 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 == 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.# == 2.065.1 // hotfix
On Debian, 2.065.rc1 is bigger than
On 1/21/14, 5:22 PM, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
It is now added: ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.b1.exe
On 1/21/14, 5:29 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 22:22:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Note: An installer is not yet prepared for Windows.
Let me know if you need any guidance on getting the Windows installer
working. Please use the one in windows/dinstaller.nsi (I
On 1/18/14, 8:42 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrew Edwards wrote in message news:lbdumk$2oki$1...@digitalmars.com...
[1] ftp://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.beta.1.zip
Windows bin folder is empty. I'd post on the list but I'm not sure it's
working at the moment.
Thanks. New file uploaded.
Beta testing for dmd 2.065 is under way. You can access the associated
zip at [1] and view the current list of regressions at [2]. Make every
effort to provide a thorough review so we can get the best product out
the door.
Please refrain from discussing the review here in the dlang.org
On 12/10/13, 2:16 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-12-09 16:30, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Make sure I got GCC, I don't think the test suite passes if DMD built
with Clang.
* you got.
Ok... will do.
On 12/10/13, 12:45 AM, Kenji Hara wrote:
On Monday, 9 December 2013 at 15:51:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 9 December 2013 at 14:49:05 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
2) What is the process to update a branch with all changes
master? I will need to do this because a lot of changes have
On 12/10/13, 10:18 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 15:09:13 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I don't understand. Rebasing the release branch on top of master
shouldn't be an option, as it means you are taking all the changes to
master and put them in the release branch. That's
All,
The following lists my progress and few points for which I need
clarification.
I created a git hub account (AndrewEdwards) and obtained necessary
access to all repos at github.com/D-Programming-Language. Access to the
ftp is pending but should be granted shortly.
I've forked the
On 12/9/13, 10:28 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 9 December 2013 at 14:49:05 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
I am experiencing a slight problem on Fedora though. After initial
config, I was able to login remotely but now receive the error
Connection refused. Can't remember changing anything to cause
On 12/9/13, 10:36 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Also I don't think you need to bother with maintaining own forks unless
you are planning to actually push something upstream. Just cloning core
repos on build systems should be enough.
At least for the time being, the only things I need to push are
82 matches
Mail list logo
