Re: [Emc-users] (No Subject)

On 6/24/22 1:18 PM, fxkl47BF--- via Emc-users wrote: i bought a 5C spin indexer one of the first thing i noticed was the indexing plate is not secured to the spindle is there a reason for not keying it ___ Emc-users mailing list

Re: [Emc-users] (No Subject)

On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 at 19:21, fxkl47BF--- via Emc-users wrote: > > i bought a 5C spin indexer > one of the first thing i noticed was the indexing plate is not secured to the > spindle > is there a reason for not keying it Sounds like a typical Chinese low-end "this could never work, but is

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 01:18, John Figie wrote: > I recently > assembled the second MB and decided to install Debian 10 using a USB drive. Is this using the standard Debian installer, or the LinuxCNC installer? -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

Dammeyer < jo...@autoartisans.com> ha scritto: > What is your C++ gui app? > > > -Original Message- > > From: theman whosoldtheworld [mailto:bleachk...@gmail.com] > > Sent: December-14-19 11:01 AM > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > > Subject: Re

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

Yes I control yesterday the actual gituh linuxcnc ... position_logger.cc is disappear. Il giorno sab 14 dic 2019 alle ore 21:21 N ha scritto: > > ... > > Refer to our testsuite for a simple standalone "UI" program which is > > tested to correctly link in every build of LinuxCNC. > > > > >

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

What is your C++ gui app? > -Original Message- > From: theman whosoldtheworld [mailto:bleachk...@gmail.com] > Sent: December-14-19 11:01 AM > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler? > > These is the rep

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

> ... > Refer to our testsuite for a simple standalone "UI" program which is > tested to correctly link in every build of LinuxCNC. > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/tests/build/ui/nml-position-logger.cc > > For my side is a nice pieces of code that help me to understand the

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

These is the reply done to me by jeff epler 1 year ago more or less Refer to our testsuite for a simple standalone "UI" program which is tested to correctly link in every build of LinuxCNC. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/master/tests/build/ui/nml-position-logger.cc For my side

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

Position logger is inteded for what? > position logger is on test folder but the problem was absolute path of > linuxcnc.nml file . position_logger.cc when compile and launch need > arguments linuxcnc.nml file is the preferred one but absolute path is > needed in any case (in my

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

position logger is on test folder but the problem was absolute path of linuxcnc.nml file . position_logger.cc when compile and launch need arguments linuxcnc.nml file is the preferred one but absolute path is needed in any case (in my case i work inside linuxcnc-dev folder). regards

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Position logger, sampler?

Not sure what position_logger.cc is and do not find the file then searching but myself used sampler, it could also log position or whatever signal is selected. > About position_logger.cc and my bad memory if I use xemc as nmlfile > obtain these error: > > bkt@bkt:~/linuxcnc-dev$

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

REAL SORRY AT ALL . ABSOLUTE PATH IS THE PROBLEM THE RIGHT COMMAND FOR OUTPUT (test1) OF position_logger.cc WAS: bkt@bkt:~$ '/home/bkt/linuxcnc-dev/test1' '/home/bkt/linuxcnc-dev/configs/common/linuxcnc.nml' regards and Happy End Of Year Holiday!! bkt Il giorno sab 14 dic 2019 alle ore

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 10 April 2018 at 14:36, John Kasunich wrote: >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/wyVFvXT2BgT9YSY22 > This one looks very interesting... some kind of capacitive or inductive > encoder? Reflective optical, and not supremely successful. The target there was etched aluminium.

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, at 9:02 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 8 April 2018 at 13:47, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 08 April 2018 02:00:59 Lawrence Glaister wrote: > > >> https://www.seeedstudio.com/fusion.html for production. Smooth as silk > >> and unbeatable prices. (10

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sunday 08 April 2018 09:02:34 andy pugh wrote: > On 8 April 2018 at 13:47, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 08 April 2018 02:00:59 Lawrence Glaister wrote: > >> https://www.seeedstudio.com/fusion.html for production. Smooth as > >> silk and unbeatable prices. (10 boards

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 8 April 2018 at 13:47, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 08 April 2018 02:00:59 Lawrence Glaister wrote: >> https://www.seeedstudio.com/fusion.html for production. Smooth as silk >> and unbeatable prices. (10 boards 3.8x2.5" for $4.41(March Sale) + >> shipping). >> > Post

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sunday 08 April 2018 04:23:23 Chris Albertson wrote: > The kind of PCB I want to make is simple. Many complex parts can be > bought on ebay as "breakout boards". I want to use these breakout > boards as if they were ICs In other words I want to replace my > collection of flying Dupont

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sunday 08 April 2018 02:00:59 Lawrence Glaister wrote: > Hi Chris, > > For the PCB milling, I used to use eagle and the pcbgcode plugin for > the longest time. Eagle got kind of funky after autocad bought them > and is now mostly a subscription service. > > I now use kicad for the schematic

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sunday 08 April 2018 01:05:53 Chris Albertson wrote: > Is anyone using a CNC mill to make PCBs? The video linked below shows > someone doing this on a small mill with Mach 3. The PCB is certainly > not high tech. The parts are all through hole with 0.1 inch lead > pitch and it is one side

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

When the bit gets dull it will leave some frayed edges, witch can be stoned away. I run it at 21K rpm and 550 mm/min. 3 passes with 0.17 mm stepover. Hopefully the finnish comes across. most of the traces are 0.4mm. also there are VIA's mounted in the picture.

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Peter, I looked it those engraver bits. Microscopic.What speed to you turn them at? 100K RPM? Also I looked at the autoleveller. Seem like a good idea. I'm working on adding automatic level to my 3D printer. But I hope my mill does not have a 0.1mm tilt. Are you able to solder SMDs

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Marcus Bowman < marcus.bow...@visible.eclipse.co.uk> wrote: > > On 8 Apr 2018, at 06:05, Chris Albertson wrote: > > > > Is there a Linux based tool chain? The part I don't see is how to > convert > > Gerber files to g-code files. > > The video mentions

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

The kind of PCB I want to make is simple. Many complex parts can be bought on ebay as "breakout boards". I want to use these breakout boards as if they were ICs In other words I want to replace my collection of flying Dupont wires and mini-size solderless breadboards with 1970 vintage PCBs

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

I use KiCAD for schematic and layout. A typical trace would be 0.4mm. The smallest tracers I go is 0.3mm. Anything thinner i the results vary alot. As for SMD's SOT23-6 and SOIC is a comfortable packages to work with. For CAM I use flatcam , with is quite messy at first, but

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 8 Apr 2018, at 06:05, Chris Albertson wrote: > > Is there a Linux based tool chain? The part I don't see is how to convert > Gerber files to g-code files. The video mentions CopperCAM, but the CopperCAM site says it takes in some Gerber files, but doesn't give enough details of the

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Hi Chris, For the PCB milling, I used to use eagle and the pcbgcode plugin for the longest time. Eagle got kind of funky after autocad bought them and is now mostly a subscription service. I now use kicad for the schematic and pcb design and an open source program called pcb2gcode to

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Tuesday 29 August 2017 06:26:45 Johann Beukes wrote: > Thanks Gene > Is this something that I can correct in the settings? Its my first > machine build so my learning curve is very very steep. > Thanks in advance. > If you arrived at that -322 by adjusting it until a dial indicator said it

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Thanks Gene Is this something that I can correct in the settings? Its my first machine build so my learning curve is very very steep. Thanks in advance. On 29 Aug 2017 12:13, "Gene Heskett" wrote: > On Monday 28 August 2017 16:25:06 Johann Beukes wrote: > > > Ok guys > >

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Monday 28 August 2017 16:25:06 Johann Beukes wrote: > Ok guys > Here's some more info on my problem. > I am very new to cnc so bare with me. > For example: Let say I want to cut a 10mm OD. The first part will be > spot on. The second will be 15 microns under and the third will be 15 > microns

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Ed wrote: > Am I right that 15 microns translates to .00038 inches? More like 0.6mil--slightly more but still software problems aren't the likely cause. What is the expected resolution from a single motor step?

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 08/28/2017 03:25 PM, Johann Beukes wrote: Ok guys Here's some more info on my problem. I am very new to cnc so bare with me. For example: Let say I want to cut a 10mm OD. The first part will be spot on. The second will be 15 microns under and the third will be 15 microns over and so it

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Ok guys Here's some more info on my problem. I am very new to cnc so bare with me. For example: Let say I want to cut a 10mm OD. The first part will be spot on. The second will be 15 microns under and the third will be 15 microns over and so it fluctuates with no definate repeatablility. I have

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Monday 28 August 2017 07:52:14 jeremy youngs wrote: > My 860 drives gave me a very hard time early on.only much sifting > through the Chenglish did I realize the drive steps on the rise and > fall. Requiring 1/2 the steps calculated. I have not found that to be the case here with a 'DM'860.

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Hi Jeremy How do I calculage that and where would I do the correction in the settings? Thanks On 28 Aug 2017 13:52, "jeremy youngs" wrote: > My 860 drives gave me a very hard time early on.only much sifting through > the Chenglish did I realize the drive steps on the rise

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

My 860 drives gave me a very hard time early on.only much sifting through the Chenglish did I realize the drive steps on the rise and fall. Requiring 1/2 the steps calculated On Aug 27, 2017 11:12 PM, "Johann Beukes" wrote: > Hi guys > I am struggeling alot with my lathe X

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Monday 28 August 2017 07:02:27 Johann Beukes wrote: > Hi Gene > Thanks so much. Would it be possible to get yojr mail adress so I can > send you some more info on the drives and so forth please? > beukes1...@gmail.com Thanks > > On 28 Aug 2017 12:48, "Gene Heskett"

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Hi Gene Thanks so much. Would it be possible to get yojr mail adress so I can send you some more info on the drives and so forth please? beukes1...@gmail.com Thanks On 28 Aug 2017 12:48, "Gene Heskett" wrote: > On Monday 28 August 2017 03:49:17 Marius Liebenberg wrote: > >

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Monday 28 August 2017 03:49:17 Marius Liebenberg wrote: > Hi Johan > > You will have to provide a bit more detail in order to get assistance. > Please explain what you mean by "does not hold size at all" > Explain how: > 1) you discovered the problem and > 2) how you measured the result and >

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Hi Johan You will have to provide a bit more detail in order to get assistance. Please explain what you mean by "does not hold size at all" Explain how: 1) you discovered the problem and 2) how you measured the result and 3) what you done to solve it thus far. Also give details on the

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Friday 10 March 2017 11:33:05 Jon Elson wrote: > On 03/10/2017 02:22 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > > I asked about how to characterize a servo motor here, got some good > > answers. Thanks. Turns out I have some capable DC servo motors. > > > > Now one more question: How are people

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 03/10/2017 02:22 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > I asked about how to characterize a servo motor here, got some good > answers. Thanks. Turns out I have some capable DC servo motors. > > Now one more question: How are people connecting these motors? It looks > to me that machine

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 10 March 2017 at 08:22, Chris Albertson wrote: > Now one more question: How are people connecting these motors? It looks > to me that machine kit/LinuxCNC/EMC can read the quadrature encoder and > product PWM to drive the motor. If so then I'D need a dual

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 28 October 2016 at 21:48, W. Martinjak wrote: > 10 Days from Missouri to Austria. Are you aware of Duzi, just over the border? http://www.mesanet.eu -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Availability: Out Of Stock :) I would suggest http://mesaus.com/index.php?route=product/category=66 JT's support is very well and fast. 10 Days from Missouri to Austria. On 2016-10-28 22:35, andy pugh wrote: > On 28 October 2016 at 21:27, Davide <77...@tiscali.it> wrote: >> Hi, i'm reading

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 28 October 2016 at 21:35, andy pugh wrote: > http://eusurplus.com/index.php?route=product/product_id=614=7i92=true_category=true Sorry, I just noticed, out of stock. :-( I can't tell if they are out of stock here:

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 28 October 2016 at 21:27, Davide <77...@tiscali.it> wrote: > Hi, i'm reading encouraging news about using the mesa 7i92 and other > ethernet cards with lcnc , but i cannot find that through european resellers. > Do you know how to buy that in europe?

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 28 March 2014 02:33, Greg Bentzinger skullwo...@yahoo.com wrote: My question tonite is how much hard drive space is needed with a 10.04 install then getting all the other source files, compilers etc. so that I could do a make and install master as RIP. The system I use for LinuxCNC

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

The Borg Collective of LinuxCNC must be busy ... so only one mind is responding via this email...;-) 40 gigs is plenty. I think you will find that after you install everything you can think, and do a git clone to setup a RIP, you will still have way over 30 gigs of drive space left. Dave

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

Thanks for all your help on this one. As a result I have improved performace a bit and maybe a more powerful z stepper driver will make it even better. Thanks again Aaron - Original Message - From: Gene Heskett Sent: 11/10/13 02:58 PM To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

did above, but usually reply by mixing our replies into the conversation. As I'm doing here. - Original Message - From: Gene Heskett Sent: 11/10/13 02:58 PM To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:38:22

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

As I appear to have been ignored... The problem probably is linked to the limited lookahead, but if you only notice it when the rotary is involved, then it may be that the rotary acceleration is much too low. It is acceleration that limits how fast a particular segment is allowed to run, and the

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:38:22 andy pugh did opine: As I appear to have been ignored... The problem probably is linked to the limited lookahead, but if you only notice it when the rotary is involved, then it may be that the rotary acceleration is much too low. It is acceleration that

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Aaron When you cut stuff with a lot of little cuts, especially curved cuts, the speed will always be slow. If you look at the constant velocity parameters of any CNC machine you will find that the machine has to accelerate and then decelerate again at the beginning and end of every cut or

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 9 November 2013 10:58, aaron moore aaronmo...@linuxmail.org wrote: The main one is low feed speed. I have tried editing the code and increasing feed and acceleration in the ini file to increase the speed, but in makes no difference. I am trying to cut a helical final cut, which seems to

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

I think LCNC can only execute one Gcode per servo cycle. Does it help to reduce your servo cycle time? -Original Message- From: aaron moore [mailto:aaronmo...@linuxmail.org] Sent: 09 November 2013 12:58 PM To: EMC userslist Subject: [Emc-users] (no subject) Hi I am trying to get my

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

I don't think it will help as the problem is acceleration over distance. I.E. Distance of move to short to reach max feed rate. On 2013/11/09 01:47 PM, Belli Button wrote: I think LCNC can only execute one Gcode per servo cycle. Does it help to reduce your servo cycle time? -Original

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

I have a stepper system and know nothing about servo cycles. - Original Message - From: Belli Button Sent: 11/09/13 11:47 AM To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\)' Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) I think LCNC can only execute one Gcode per servo cycle. Does it help to reduce

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

11:17 AM To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Aaron When you cut stuff with a lot of little cuts, especially curved cuts, the speed will always be slow. If you look at the constant velocity parameters of any CNC machine you will find that the machine has

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Saturday 09 November 2013 10:11:49 Marius Liebenberg did opine: I don't think it will help as the problem is acceleration over distance. I.E. Distance of move to short to reach max feed rate. The other problem no one has mentioned is that his LCNC machine is old slow, however the OP did

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

it. Do you have any tips for reducing the numer of moves in a job? Sorry. I forgot to put a subject up top, Aaron - Original Message - From: Marius Liebenberg Sent: 11/09/13 11:17 AM To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Aaron When you cut stuff

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)Rotary problems

the numer of moves in a job? Sorry. I forgot to put a subject up top, Aaron - Original Message - From: Marius Liebenberg Sent: 11/09/13 11:17 AM To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) Aaron When you cut stuff with a lot of little cuts, especially

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

If that would suit then I'm happy with that Andy I would have too much io on the intended machine for just the p port I was wanting to use the Mesa 5i25 7i76 png kit Then the strip board with uln chip - is there anything else to go with the chip apart from the required connectors Is it just a

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 8 May 2013 23:09, john d norton j...@jnfabs.co.uk wrote: I would have too much io on the intended machine for just the p port I was wanting to use the Mesa 5i25 7i76 png kit In that case you might want to discuss with Mesa. it is entirely possible that there is an easy way to make the 7i76

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 6 May 2013 19:15, john d norton j...@jnfabs.co.uk wrote: Can anybody suggest the best chip to use to get bettween the 5 volt step and dir output to 24volt that my drives will take Just about any opto-isolator should work nicely. Or a ULN2003 if you already have isolation and need

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

I often use one of the ULN2002,2003,2004 series for that sort of work You probably need the ULN2003, there are variants(later) ULN2803 too Dave Caroline -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book Graph

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

It's mainly having something to switch as fast as needed for step outputs Is this going to be a custom job or is there some kind of dev board I could get that'd have say just a subtitle chip on it ? On 6 May 2013, at 19:42, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 May 2013 19:15, john d norton

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 6 May 2013 21:57, john d norton j...@jnfabs.co.uk wrote: It's mainly having something to switch as fast as needed for step outputs Is this going to be a custom job or is there some kind of dev board I could get that'd have say just a subtitle chip on it ? It's probably simplest to make

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Yes http://www.baldor.com/support/Literature/Load.ashx/MN1942?ManNumber=MN1942 Section 5.2.4.1 Many thanks John d norton C/o John Norton Fabs On 7 May 2013, at 00:09, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 May 2013 21:57, john d norton j...@jnfabs.co.uk wrote: It's mainly having

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 7 May 2013 01:07, john d norton j...@jnfabs.co.uk wrote: http://www.baldor.com/support/Literature/Load.ashx/MN1942?ManNumber=MN1942 Ah, OK, servo in step-dir mode. I was assuming stepper motors. 8.1.6 says minimum 12V, max 30V, so you are going to need a buffer. The inputs are already

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 22 August 2012 16:54, Ricardo Moscoloni rmoscol...@gmail.com wrote: The setup is a fairly simple aplication for a filament winding machine, similar to a lathe, but with naming convention as this: Do you really want to drive this machine with G-code? I would be tempted just to mathematically

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

is that a link to an easter egg? --- On Sun, 4/8/12, Geoff Roehm 1947...@att.net wrote: From: Geoff Roehm 1947...@att.net Subject: [Emc-users] (no subject) To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sunday, April 8, 2012, 8:23 PM 1947...@att.net

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

what do you suppose the laser wattage is? --- On Tue, 3/13/12, dave dengv...@charter.net wrote: From: dave dengv...@charter.net Subject: [Emc-users] (no subject) To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2012, 11:38 AM This was sent to me

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Renishaw website seems to indicate between 100 and 400 W. The description ytterbium fibre laser would suggest a wavelength around 1064nm (not the CO2 10um usually used for laser-cutters) On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:19 PM, charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote: what do you suppose the laser

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Saturday, February 25, 2012 04:32:33 PM Greg Bernard did opine: The factory of the future: http://www.youtube.com/embed/nd5WGLWNllA?rel=0 Now that is how it should be done. Unforch it doesn't seem to extend downward to the likes of the Jetta. The one (a 2002 with a very healthy 4 banger)

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

The factory of the future: http://www.youtube.com/embed/nd5WGLWNllA?rel=0 Almost. I still see humans on the assembly line. -- Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 11/26/2011 5:32 PM, Robert van dyke wrote: Please remove me from your mailing list. Bob Van Dyke -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers,

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Chris, was this a genuine posting or your personal spambot?? jan. On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Chris Reynolds c_reynolds2...@yahoo.comwrote: It’s awesome!!! In no time you’ll rid of your problems!!!.. http://news-trial.com/friends_links.php?coPage=14pj1

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

It’s awesome!!! In no time you’ll rid of your problems!!!.. http://news-trial.com/friends_links.php?coPage=14pj1 -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Jon Elson wrote: The IBM move elevated the least capable chip set to dominance and crippled the superior chip manufactures. Oh, we're talking about almost 30 years ago, now. OK, yes, the I86 architecture is an abomination of incomprehensible magnitude. I have always said that IBM made

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Yeh, how else would we get to see toyl porn pics of Stuart's Enshu? ;-) Mark On 09/22/2010 04:38 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:58 -0400, Don Stanley wrote: ... snip I think you are totally correct, the industry has been hijacked for fun instead of work. Where

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 07:42 +0100, Lester Caine wrote: Jon Elson wrote: The IBM move elevated the least capable chip set to dominance and crippled the superior chip manufactures. Oh, we're talking about almost 30 years ago, now. OK, yes, the I86 architecture is an abomination of

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 22 September 2010 04:15, Don Stanley dstanley1...@gmail.com wrote: If Anyone has a list of things needed it would be a life extender for me. Also if anyone has a favorite online store for these items I could work and live even longer. The D510MO comes with only a back panel and 2 SATA

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Don Stanley said, in part: I was grudgingly coming to the same conclusion. I did some comparisons today. I could not believe the fastest computers in the shop with minimum graphics (the AMD Atahlon 64 4000+ we have trying to fix) only performs slightly better than a Pentium IV 400MHZ

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:05 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote: Don Stanley said, in part: The user's perception of the speed and responsiveness of these machines has almost nothing to do with the qualities we need in real-time control. The qualities we need for real-time control have been

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:19 -0700, dave wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:05 -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote: Don Stanley said, in part: ... snip Old, un-improved Pentiums end up looking very good when your foremost goal is consistent, low latency. ... snip Good post. Sorry to have snipped so

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Kirk Wallace wrote: Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:01:24 -0700 From: Kirk Wallace kwall...@wallacecompany.com Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

dave wrote: Good post. Sorry to have snipped so much of it but... All of the above is what makes the ARM/Beagle-board port so attractive. We don't need blazing speed, just blazing interrupt response and context switching. And, the irritating part is, we still have NO IDEA what the real

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:05:07 -0400 From: Kent A. Reed knbr...@erols.com Subject: Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system I feel your pain and I know that trying to explain why you have it doesn't make it go away. A lot of us on this mail list and its companion

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Andy Pugh a...@andypugh.fsnet.co.ukwrote: On 22 September 2010 04:15, Don Stanley dstanley1...@gmail.com wrote: If Anyone has a list of things needed it would be a life extender for me. Also if anyone has a favorite online store for these items I could work

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:29 -0700, Peter C. Wallace wrote: On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Kirk Wallace wrote: ... snip Whats wrong with the Intel D510 motherboards at ~$80. I think they have ~8-10 usec latency with the SMP 10.04 kernel. Peter Wallace Nothing. It would probably save temporal money.

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Thanks Kent; I guess my greatest disappointment is that was an AMD processor. I have been routing for them from their beginning, and Zialog and Motorola before that. If IBM had not chose to Dumb Down their PC to stop the threat to their computer line, we would have unimaginable computing

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:58 -0400, Don Stanley wrote: ... snip I think you are totally correct, the industry has been hijacked for fun instead of work. Where would the Internet (and in someway EMC2) be without porn? -- Kirk Wallace http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On 9/21/2010 11:15 PM, Don Stanley wrote: This is going to be an extra effort for me living on the back side of the moon in the Appalachian mountains where the nearest computer store isn't, and all this has to be done on the Internet. That is pretty much the norm for city folk now also...

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On 9/22/2010 4:38 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:58 -0400, Don Stanley wrote: ... snip I think you are totally correct, the industry has been hijacked for fun instead of work. Where would the Internet (and in someway EMC2) be without porn? Uh?? .. care

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

Don Stanley wrote: It had not entered my mind to power the USC from the computer 12Volts. The old keep the noise out of the computer mind set. But the printer cable has already piped the USC ground into the motherboard. If the USC input filter capacitor is able to swamp any noise from the USC

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Don Stanley wrote: If IBM had not chose to Dumb Down their PC to stop the threat to their computer line, we would have unimaginable computing capability in a chips now. No, not really. IBM has not been involved in the PC business for at least 4 years, now, they sold their name (for the PC

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

Dave wrote: On 9/22/2010 4:38 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:58 -0400, Don Stanley wrote: ... snip Where would the Internet (and in someway EMC2) be without porn? Uh?? .. care to explain further...?? He's talking about computer porn, I think

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 19:48 -0400, Dave wrote: On 9/22/2010 4:38 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote: On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 15:58 -0400, Don Stanley wrote: ... snip I think you are totally correct, the industry has been hijacked for fun instead of work. Where would the Internet (and in

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject)

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote: Don Stanley wrote: It had not entered my mind to power the USC from the computer 12Volts. The old keep the noise out of the computer mind set. But the printer cable has already piped the USC ground into the

Re: [Emc-users] (no subject) or, old system vs new system

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote: The problem is Gordon Moore's law has finally expired (long live Gordon Moore!) Notice that CPU speeds (about 3 GHz) have totally flattened out after 3 decades of continuous increase. Speeds have not increased at

  1   2   >