RE: MTA loop
If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin group. -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: MTA loop Question 2: My experience is that you can stop this service without any problem on a stand-alone server with nothing on it than ExchangeServer and an AV-Product. Question 3: On 5.5 I would have suggested to edit the registry and remove the entry. But on E2K I've not looked for something similar. But it's worth a try to check the registry. In the AD you don't see a computer object for it? You're on SP1 or SP2, right? And yes any EventIDs to your error descriptions? Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Januar 2002 17:02 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: MTA loop Hi folks, hope everyone had a good new year. I need some background to help troubleshoot a strange problem. Way back when, when we were still on 5.5, we moved our mailboxes to a new server, and though we had no problem with any of the boxes or connectivity (thanks Mr. Crowley!) for some reason 5.5 system administrator continued to list the old server in it's console, but it was of course unaccessible, and since it no longer existed and didn't seem to foul anything up, we didn't worry about it. When we upgraded the server to 2000, the phantom server still appears, though it is now greyed out in exchange system manager. I'm not sure what triggered it, but recently our tranaction logs started growing a a rediculous rate (3/min!) to the point where the HD was full, IS stopped, yada, yada. After sleuthing about a bit, it seemed that every time the MS Exchange MTA Stacks service started, the following errors were logged in the app log, and then the transaction logs started expanding: A loop has been detected in the message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020102152109Z-1 being transferred in. A non-delivery report was generated with reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected. [MTA XFER-IN 11 104] (14) and A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020102152109Z-1. It was originally destined for DN:CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB,CN=EXCHANGE,CN=SERVERS,CN=CONFIGURATION,OU=BLACKBAUD-DC,O=JUILLIARD§ (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:ROUTER 11 136] (12) so, there is a loop. ok got that. Question one: even after these events are logged the trans logs fill up as though the loop is continuing. why? Question two: with only one server in the network right now, do i need the MTA service? My workaround was to stop the service, and everything seems to be funtioning ok. we do plan on expanding at some point, so i will need it working properly eventually. Question three: How do i get rid of the phantom server, doing which i suspect will fix the MTA problem? If you've made it this far, and think you have some insights, a thousand thank yous. Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ?
Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ?
Are we talking NT local/global groups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ? Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ?
Both. Actually, just found it in the resource kit. Global.exe and local.exe Thanks -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ? Are we talking NT local/global groups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ? Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. Network Defence Ltd ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows 2000 License
This isn't an appropriate question for this forum. You need to be speaking with someone from Trend Micro it sounds like. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Windows 2000 License Importance: High Hi friends, I am testing trendMicro Product. I haven't installed yet the ScaMail but we wilI test it too. At the moment I have installed ScanOffice application on Windows 2000 Server( Member Server with one simple Server License). I want to know if I will need to purchase Client Server License for use TrendMicro or I can to use TrendMicro on Windows 2000 Member server with Simple Server License. Any help will be apreciate. Liliana :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: fix monitor
Sorry, but you forgot to add your Kelly Only disclaimer, so you can't make
any threats.
If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly to read, you
should add the following:
Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone else reading this
message will die.
Of course, you should probably run it by legal and have them punch it up a
bit. But then you wouldn't have to worry about anyone else on the list
reading your messages for Kelly. 8-{)
...Joel
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
That was for Kelly only...now you must die.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Did someone say lightsaber?
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
The real question is: Are you willing to try it?
That was for the light saber thing. love ya
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
Would that taste like chicken too?
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor
Mmm... fried Tener
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: fix monitor
I realize I am late to this discussion, as I have read many catapult
references, however I don't think it was addressed. I am relatively new
To the Exchange World, only a year and a half working with it. But I have
Been involved with Networking and Computers in general for the last 12
years. I got my start (as probably did everyone here) working on hardware.
Richard, I can tell you there are most certainly no user serviceable parts
In a monitor. And Opening one up can be Fatal. The Flyback Capacitor Can
hold a charge of several thousand volts for years. There is more than
enough
Voltage there to severely burn you, if not kill you. Like everyone one else
Here has said, it's cheaper to buy a new one, then get an old one
fixed.
Unless.You live near a High School that has a Vocational Education
Program that specializes in Electronics. These kinds of schools Will
usually
Fix the equipment at no charge save for parts.
Just An idea.
Ken
Kenneth Davis
IT Manager
American Wood Moulding, LLC
For a moment, nothing happened.
Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: fix monitor
for all u hardware/monitor geniuses out there do u know a good place on the
web to tell me how to open/fix a monitor?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their current dat download is at 4179. -Original Message- From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant? So has anyone actually seen this puppy in the wild? NAI states Low Risk. Curious... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99291 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Stores
Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Stores
Have you looked at the ASP hosting documentation out at Microsoft.com? I believe there are a number of good white papers on hosting Exchange which cover this in good detail. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Stores Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message Stores
If you really need true data separation, you need separate servers in separate Exchange organizations IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Stores Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Deleted Items folder
Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
It takes time for the information store to process the deleted items and update. Wait two hours, or have the user exit then go back into the client and check again. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
This is the folder size in the Outlook client right? Because deleted items in the Exchange admin doesn't correspond to the deleted items folder in the client, and the behavior you are describing would be expected if we're talking about the admin. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
Good question, but the answer is Yes it is on the client. I right click on the Deleted Items and Go to properties folder size -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder This is the folder size in the Outlook client right? Because deleted items in the Exchange admin doesn't correspond to the deleted items folder in the client, and the behavior you are describing would be expected if we're talking about the admin. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Default Permissions
By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide? TIA! To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly. Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA loop
In response to both your posts - SRS is running, and when i connect with exchange 55 admin and try to delete the phantom server i get the following error: you cannot delete the exchange server because it is still active. Shut the server down and try again. needless to say, there is no server active with that name. Strangely, there does appear to be an entry for the phantom server in the computers OU. I think it was grandfathered in due to a static mapping in the DNS server. I've removed both entries - AD and DNS, and continue to get the same error. We are on E2k SP1, and the errors that were generated in the event log are specifically: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 201 Date: 1/7/2002 Time: 4:47:17 AM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: A loop has been detected in the message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020105031501Z-5 being transferred in. A non-delivery report was generated with reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected. [MTA XFER-IN 12 104] (14) then: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 1/7/2002 Time: 4:47:07 AM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020104001500Z-2. It was originally destined for DN:CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB,CN=EXCHANGE,CN=SERVERS,CN=CONFIGURATION,OU=BLACKBAUD-DC,O=JUILLIARD§ (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:ROUTER 12 136] (12) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA loop If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin group. -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: MTA loop Question 2: My experience is that you can stop this service without any problem on a stand-alone server with nothing on it than ExchangeServer and an AV-Product. Question 3: On 5.5 I would have suggested to edit the registry and remove the entry. But on E2K I've not looked for something similar. But it's worth a try to check the registry. In the AD you don't see a computer object for it? You're on SP1 or SP2, right? And yes any EventIDs to your error descriptions? Ricki _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem solved
Hello all-- Sometime back I emailed the group about a Mailbox Manager (on E2K) problem. No one in the group was able to help me solve it, but now that I've got it fixed, I thought I'd pass along the info in case it helps anyone else. Specifically, Mailbox Manager quit working after I applied the Information Store patch Q303451engi386.exe. I called MS, and, after checking into a lot of things they suggested applying E2K SP2. After I got an update to keep my AV software working with SP2, I updated. Now Mailbox Manager is working again. Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Robert Moore, MCSE Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
Try connecting via OWA or with the Exchange client and see if there is anything in the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder Good question, but the answer is Yes it is on the client. I right click on the Deleted Items and Go to properties folder size -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder This is the folder size in the Outlook client right? Because deleted items in the Exchange admin doesn't correspond to the deleted items folder in the client, and the behavior you are describing would be expected if we're talking about the admin. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OL02 Views not presented correctly
Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation? I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will still show in the original Conversation. If you check the header, it's still got the original Thread-Topic in the header, so it keeps it in the original conversation. I don't remember ever seeing this behavior in prior versions. Though it could be I've just not had enough coffee yet. :-) Has anyone seen this behavior too? Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Deleted Items folder
What about deletec item retention on the server? And is this after the IS maintenance has run at night? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Vinny Avallone | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/07/2002 11:11 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: The Deleted Items folder | -| Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Hi all. I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with? I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the attachments. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Win2k backup and Exchange
I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
We have a 30 day retention level and yes is it after the IS Maintenance. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The Deleted Items folder What about deletec item retention on the server? And is this after the IS maintenance has run at night? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Vinny Avallone | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/07/2002 11:11 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: The Deleted Items folder | --- --| Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
Vinny, Check in Outlook, under the Tools menu, look for Recover deleted items. Recover them and then delete those as well. May resolve your problem. Doug Deaton, MCSE IS Technical Support Sunterra Pacific 425-454-3065 xt 1212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. This e-mail and any attachment(s) are believed to be free from virus. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt, opening or use of this e-mail and any attachment(s). Thank You. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Deleted Items folder
I'll try that. I have to wait until he gets his mail under 98M. There will be 30days of deleted items. -Original Message- From: Deaton, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder Vinny, Check in Outlook, under the Tools menu, look for Recover deleted items. Recover them and then delete those as well. May resolve your problem. Doug Deaton, MCSE IS Technical Support Sunterra Pacific 425-454-3065 xt 1212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The Deleted Items folder Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted mail, the Deleted Items size increases, but whenever Empty Deleted Items, it doesn't go to 0, it stays at 12M. It is a laptop using the Offline Stores. Thanks for any advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. This e-mail and any attachment(s) are believed to be free from virus. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt, opening or use of this e-mail and any attachment(s). Thank You. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder
Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never look at the copy in Org Forms Library. It'll always read the one in your Personal Forms Library. S. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder I have a form that I made some time ago. It had been working fine for some time and now when someone fills out the form and clicks send it goes to there drafts folder. I found that in the options for the email the option Do not deliver before: was checked with a date in the box. This had never been checked previously and I am the only one with publish ability. The strang this is I just made a copy of the form, deleted the one from the Organizational library, edited the saved form the orignal format without the options checked and republished it. Every time i publish it, it adds the date for some reason. I must be missing something, I just don't know if it is client or server side. Any ideas, Thanks, Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
The evidence is inconclusive. He only admits that his ass is white. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Ed, you're White? - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:40 AM Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question This isn't good e- nough for you? Well, then you can kiss my big white ass! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question I especially hate the ones that are not 5-7-5 but actually 17 syllable sentences that are word-wrapped into Haiku format. S. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question I mock nothing, it's.. it's just that some of it is so BAD! And if you like, I'll mail suggestions for chi enhancing exercises. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question you mock my innermost feelings...my chi...my essence? May the goddesses have mercy on your soul. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question No, that strange poetry stuff. Hari-Kiri?? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Work? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question We can surely tell that it is Friday, can't we. I like this much better than that other thing you do on Friday. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question black widow Then you would be dead. /black widow _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clustering Book
Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Use NT backup to dump to file, then use ArgServ to dump that file to tape. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel, David Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win2k backup and Exchange I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Default Permissions
The permissions on a Public Folder apply to anyone who can reach it. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Default Permissions By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide? TIA! To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly. Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
you've not accounted for the transaction logs. full nightly backups will take care of your needs. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4
You might consider just installing the Exchange admin on the remote workstation. Or perhaps ADSI can return the data required. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Hi all. I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with? I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the attachments. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Because they are the Shiznit. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that have been placed out there for our perusal to make our jobs easier. Who'd a thunk it? D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660
RE: Clustering Book
Clustering is very hardware dependant. You may wish to try Compaq's course: Implementing Windows 2000 on Compaq ProLiant Clusters http://www.compaq.com/training/364.html Darryl AltaVista -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Book Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I keep a copy of it printed and on top of my recovery box. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or
RE: Clustering Book
I have some Exchange books clustered on my bookshelf. The whitepapers on the Microsoft site are not bad. What consulting service have you chosen to use for this deployment? If unselected, may I recommend Scharff and Associates? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Book Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I think William invented it? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that have been placed out there for our perusal to make our jobs easier. Who'd a thunk it? D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Reading? What's that? Documents? Where am I? :) T. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that have been placed out there for our perusal to make our jobs easier. Who'd a thunk it? D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer would be appreciated. ] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must
RE: Clustering Book
I understand Bob Barker has experience in this arena as well... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering Book I have some Exchange books clustered on my bookshelf. The whitepapers on the Microsoft site are not bad. What consulting service have you chosen to use for this deployment? If unselected, may I recommend Scharff and Associates? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Book Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Good answer!! If nobody can access anything, why wait until the middle of the night? Do it now! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder
Is there some code on the form that is setting this? In design mode go to Form, View code. The other way may be that the Defer Until field is added on a hidden tab and it has the initial value set. Scott -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 7, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never look at the copy in Org Forms Library. It'll always read the one in your Personal Forms Library. S. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder I have a form that I made some time ago. It had been working fine for some time and now when someone fills out the form and clicks send it goes to there drafts folder. I found that in the options for the email the option Do not deliver before: was checked with a date in the box. This had never been checked previously and I am the only one with publish ability. The strang this is I just made a copy of the form, deleted the one from the Organizational library, edited the saved form the orignal format without the options checked and republished it. Every time i publish it, it adds the date for some reason. I must be missing something, I just don't know if it is client or server side. Any ideas, Thanks, Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly
You just haven't had enough coffee. The conversation header is separate from subject line. So, what you're seeing is by design. It's been there all the time. As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by conversation and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a thread are indented based on the reply, just like a forum. S. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL02 Views not presented correctly Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation? I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will still show in the original Conversation. If you check the header, it's still got the original Thread-Topic in the header, so it keeps it in the original conversation. I don't remember ever seeing this behavior in prior versions. Though it could be I've just not had enough coffee yet. :-) Has anyone seen this behavior too? Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append rather than overwrite the media is grayed out on the differential. If this differential is going to overwrite the full backup then a single tape source for backup isn't feasible. I'm sure it is but I'm just missing something so anything you can offer
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear Andy, Yes. After installing SP4, each of the four Servers were rebooted, then I ran Performance Optimizer, then rebooted. I may run Performance Optimizer again, after the reboot at 2:00 AM on Tuesday. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 01:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear Martin, I was not clear enough. E-mail is flowing and being delivered. Users can access their mailboxes. I am not able to open a mailbox using the Exchange Admin Program from the fourth Exchange Server. I can open any mailbox, using the Exchange Admin Program, from any of the other three Exchange Servers, and it does not matter what Server is the Home Server for the mailbox. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 01:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Good answer!! If nobody can access anything, why wait until the middle of the night? Do it now! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP4 After applying SP4, I was unable to open any mailbox. So, on each Exchange Server I ran the following. MS Exchange Admin Program Select the respective Server Directory Service (General Tab) Check knowledge consistency: Check Now After this, I can open any mailbox from any of the three Exchange Servers, but not from the fourth. When running the KCC on the fourth Exchange Server, I receive the following message. Knowledge consistency has been successfully verified. The knowledge consistency checker is already running. If expected changes did not occur, try running it again later. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no: c1030b27 On Saturday, we decided to let this go until Monday, in case it took that long to run. We get the same results today. I ran this message against Tech Net on the Web and did not find any relevant hits. Event Viewer did not show anything out of the ordinary. At this point, we are going to reboot this Exchange Server at 2:00 AM on Tuesday morning. I am wresting with the idea of re-applying SP4 to this Exchange Server, which is the first Exchange Server in the site. Any other ideas? Have you seen this before? Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA loop
MAILBOX may not be running Exchange or even be running, but have you tried pinging the IP address that was associated with that server? If it pings, then you may have your DNS set to resolve that IP to that NetBIOS name. If true, E2K may think that Exchange server is still up and running? I don't know, just a SWAG, since I'm not running E2K. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA loop In response to both your posts - SRS is running, and when i connect with exchange 55 admin and try to delete the phantom server i get the following error: you cannot delete the exchange server because it is still active. Shut the server down and try again. needless to say, there is no server active with that name. Strangely, there does appear to be an entry for the phantom server in the computers OU. I think it was grandfathered in due to a static mapping in the DNS server. I've removed both entries - AD and DNS, and continue to get the same error. We are on E2k SP1, and the errors that were generated in the event log are specifically: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 201 Date: 1/7/2002 Time: 4:47:17 AM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: A loop has been detected in the message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020105031501Z-5 being transferred in. A non-delivery report was generated with reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected. [MTA XFER-IN 12 104] (14) then: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 290 Date: 1/7/2002 Time: 4:47:07 AM User: N/A Computer: MAILBOX Description: A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code loop-detected) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=Juilliard;L=MAILBOX-020104001500Z-2. It was originally destined for DN:CN=MICROSOFT PUBLIC MDB,CN=EXCHANGE,CN=SERVERS,CN=CONFIGURATION,OU=BLACKBAUD-DC,O=JUILLIARD§ (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:ROUTER 12 136] (12) For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. Jeremy -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 3:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA loop If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin group. -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: MTA loop Question 2: My experience is that you can stop this service without any problem on a stand-alone server with nothing on it than ExchangeServer and an AV-Product. Question 3: On 5.5 I would have suggested to edit the registry and remove the entry. But on E2K I've not looked for something similar. But it's worth a try to check the registry. In the AD you don't see a computer object for it? You're on SP1 or SP2, right? And yes any EventIDs to your error descriptions? Ricki _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder- RESOLVED
Thanks both Scott and Serdar, The problem was that the Defer Until fieled was added an hidden in the form. Don't know how it got there but dont really care that much anyway. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction Scott. Marty -Original Message- From: Scott Perley-TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:28 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder Subject: RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder Is there some code on the form that is setting this? In design mode go to Form, View code. The other way may be that the Defer Until field is added on a hidden tab and it has the initial value set. Scott -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 7, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never look at the copy in Org Forms Library. It'll always read the one in your Personal Forms Library. S. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder I have a form that I made some time ago. It had been working fine for some time and now when someone fills out the form and clicks send it goes to there drafts folder. I found that in the options for the email the option Do not deliver before: was checked with a date in the box. This had never been checked previously and I am the only one with publish ability. The strang this is I just made a copy of the form, deleted the one from the Organizational library, edited the saved form the orignal format without the options checked and republished it. Every time i publish it, it adds the date for some reason. I must be missing something, I just don't know if it is client or server side. Any ideas, Thanks, Marty _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
If your backups are so damn important, why do you use some crappy a$$ backup product like ArcCrap? If your lawyers want so much out of so little, why don't you explain to them that in order to reach their desired goal, they will have to spend some coin to accomplish this? Might I suggest CommVault Galaxy? Having nightly full backups or differentials will give you no love in a entire server crash. Is your system so unstable that it crashes that frequently? Would you not see a full-blown crash coming if you were performing periodic system maintenance? I would see it, I have seen it... I've done many disaster recoveries in my time and most every time, I have been able to recover every piece of mail. Exactly, what kind of service are these lawyers expecting? Are you planning on keeping backups up to date within the hour or something? Again, why are you not using a REAL backup solution if your data is sooo sensitive and your needs so great? Sounds to me like someone told these lawyers they could offer a high level SLA with a very poor plan in place... Just my opinion of course... I know what I can offer and how I will offer it though... -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much more is the question?. Yours sincerely, Sean McGilligan [ I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I decided to use NTBackup rather than ARCServe on my servers. I cannot, however, find a way to setup the backups correctly. I aim to do a nightly full backup at 11pm with differentials every two hours from 6am until 8pm when the tape would be replaced for that night's backup. I see in the backup wizard how to set the daily backup as a normal and how to schedule a second differential backup for only the information store at my selected times. However, the option to append
RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly
That's what I thought. I have my views configured the way you state (always have), but I'm still seeing weird sorting behavior. I'm seeing it on multiple machines, so I know it's not isolated. I never saw this happen with prior versions. It's probably a config problem. Take a look at the thread titled The Deleted Item Folder and look for the message from Robert Moore with the subject line Problem solved. In prior versions, that I believe that would have changed thread. I'm probably mistaken, but tell me what you think. T. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly You just haven't had enough coffee. The conversation header is separate from subject line. So, what you're seeing is by design. It's been there all the time. As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by conversation and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a thread are indented based on the reply, just like a forum. S. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL02 Views not presented correctly Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation? I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will still show in the original Conversation. If you check the header, it's still got the original Thread-Topic in the header, so it keeps it in the original conversation. I don't remember ever seeing this behavior in prior versions. Though it could be I've just not had enough coffee yet. :-) Has anyone seen this behavior too? Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly
Well, you're right. There is something weird going on. When I grouped by conversation, it did separate on mine, even though I am also running XP. BUT, I have upgraded from 2000 as opposed to a fresh install. The other thing is when you group by conversation you can't sort them. The sorting doesn't work. I tried sorting by conversation and/or subject and it's still not sorted alpabetically. This is too weird. S. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly That's what I thought. I have my views configured the way you state (always have), but I'm still seeing weird sorting behavior. I'm seeing it on multiple machines, so I know it's not isolated. I never saw this happen with prior versions. It's probably a config problem. Take a look at the thread titled The Deleted Item Folder and look for the message from Robert Moore with the subject line Problem solved. In prior versions, that I believe that would have changed thread. I'm probably mistaken, but tell me what you think. T. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly You just haven't had enough coffee. The conversation header is separate from subject line. So, what you're seeing is by design. It's been there all the time. As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by conversation and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a thread are indented based on the reply, just like a forum. S. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL02 Views not presented correctly Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation? I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will still show in the original Conversation. If you check the header, it's still got the original Thread-Topic in the header, so it keeps it in the original conversation. I don't remember ever seeing this behavior in prior versions. Though it could be I've just not had enough coffee yet. :-) Has anyone seen this behavior too? Tom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I think our friend is assuming his entire server died. In which case, he'd be what I would consider a reactive admin versus a proactive admin... Servers don't just crash David. There is always something that leads up to the crash and with real hardware in place such as Compaq, Dell, or otherwise, you will get some kind of indication ahead of time that disaster is near. As Ken mentioned, log files should always be on another spindle unless there are some financial constraints. Being that these lawyers are requiring so much, they should be willing to spend a little cheddar to get the right tools in place to accomplish the task at hand. D -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend Veritas Backupexec as NTBackup is a stripped down version albeit free, but again it comes down to the horses for courses and each person can tell a different story where backups are concerned. My reasoning is the restore times from testing are faster with Veritas. Whether you want to pay that much
Information Store growing rapidly!!!!
Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my priv IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do and offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB (was 19 went down to 18). Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag and that in only 8h. When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not +2GB. Actually the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB wile my priv.ed is now 20.5GB! I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. I also noticed that the Mailboxes resources Listing shows the Exchange Admin account as the NT account on many mailboxes. When double clicking the mailbox it shows the correct account in the details. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. regards Osama S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating mailbox in MS Exchange5.5
when a user registers on our website, we have to create a mailbox through an ASP page on MS Exchange Server5.5 on a Windows NT4.0 with IIS4.0 and ADSI2.5 installed on it. Since i am new to this please bear with my simple queries and help me out. here is my questionaire... 1. Do i need to install anything else on my server for this job? 2. Do i need to change any settings on my Exchange server or IIS? 3. How do i check the version of LDAP running on the system? 4. I have not installed any LDAP server on my system as it seems MS Exchange 5.5 has a built-in one. Is this true? Now let me tell you the trials i have made. 1. Due to reported conflicts in Port number 386 used by LDAP by default i have changed it to 777 following is the code which i am using to create a mail box. in this code 2. I am trying to first logon to the NT Server, for creating a mailbox, with administrator rights. i guess the logon itself fails. So i need some help in this area also. 3. Now i am trying to create a mailbox and then trying to associate it with an existing NT account. % OrgName = org SiteName = site strUserName = administrator ' this user has admin rights on winnt server strPassword =pass LoginId = kalyan 'mailbox name to create FirstName = Kalyan LastName = Chakravarthy 'Start Logon to NT strADsPath = WinNT://venus Set oADsObject = GetObject(strADsPath) Dim strADsNamespace Dim oADsNamespace strADsNamespace = left(strADsPath, instr(strADsPath, :)) set oADsNamespace = GetObject(strADsNamespace) Set oADsObject = oADsNamespace.OpenDSObject(strADsPath, strUserName, strPassword, 0) 'End Logon to NT 'Start Getting the SID for the user ID to which all mailboxes are associated with by using ADSItools component dim varSecurityID Set objSIDComp = Server.CreateObject(ADSITools.ExNTSID) varSecurityID = objSIDComp.GetMySID(servername, domain, Administrator) 'End Getting the SID for the user ID that all mailboxes are associated with 'Start Creating the mailbox in the DS with ADSI strPath = LDAP://venus:777/o=; OrgName /ou= SiteName /cn=Recipients Set recipcont_obj = GetObject(CStr(strPath)) 'LDAP Name...should be same as alias Set recip_obj = recipcont_obj.Create(organizationalPerson, Loginid) recip_obj.Put mailPreferenceOption, 0 recip_obj.Put sn, LastName'Last Name recip_obj.Put cn, LoginId 'Mailbox Name recip_obj.Put givenName, FirstName'First Name recip_obj.Put uid, LoginId'Alias recip_obj.Put Home-MTA, cn=Microsoft MTA,cn= ServerName ,cn=Servers,cn=Configuration,ou= SiteName ,o= OrgName recip_obj.Put Home-MDB, cn=Microsoft Private MDB,cn= ServerName ,cn=Servers,cn=Configuration,ou= SiteName ,o= OrgName Response.Write varSecurityID recip_obj.Put Assoc-NT-Account, (varSecurityID) 'Associate this mail box with a primary Windows Account of Administrator recip_obj.Put mail, LoginId @ Domain 'SMTP Address recip_obj.setinfo ' commit the contents of the adsi object to the directory 'End Creating the mailbox in the DS with ADSI Response.Write Success... Your new MailBox created. % using this code i am getting the following error:error '80072021' thank you in anticipation. kalyan. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Your posts are duplicating rapidly as well. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering Book
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/182338/qid=1010425818/sr=1-1/ref= sr_1_10_1/107-8403454-7361339 Link may wrap. Missy - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:21 PM Subject: Clustering Book Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2K Blank Repeating Menu Bars Problem
Don't want to sound like a jerk, but if you can't touch it, what good any advice you receive would do? People will make suggestions and you won't be able to try any of them. It looks like a screen refresh problem to me. Maybe she needs an updated video card driver. However, she won't stop having problems if every week a kid comes over and uses her system registry like a box of legos. S. -Original Message- From: Herrick, Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2K Blank Repeating Menu Bars Problem My wife's machine (Win98 SE) has a problem. Each time she creates a new message in Outlook, she receives a new, blank menu bar at the top of the message. It stays there after the message is sent. So 22 messages later, she has no screen space and has to restart Outlook. She works at the local University, so I can't touch the machine, and the Uni's help desk sends a kid over every week to search Q and mess with the registry, but they never actually solve the problem. I'd image it, but I can't touch it. I guess they've reinstalled Outlook and it's still an issue. NAV scans have come up empty. Does anyone have any ideas? Much appreciated, Justin Herrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
They communicate through public bussing?? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site Exchange 5.5 servers communicate through the MTA when they're in the same site. Missy - Original Message - From: John Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site What allows them to talk to each other, i.e. what connector x.400 through RPC? Can you tell Exchange which server to put the mailboxes? Thnaks, -John Q Jr. I checked the logs and there was no receipt of mail anyhere between 12:00 - 4:00 PST from msn. You did however receive mail from a @uophx.edu connection at 15:21:27. This confirms that you were getting mail at this time.? - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:05 AM Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication You really need to give us a load more info. Is it part of an existing Ex5.5 set up with an ADC in place? Did you use the ADMT or a third-party equivalent to migrate the users? Etc, etc. Mark Briefly though, you'll need to add the NT4 accounts into the mailbox permissions of the mailbox-enabled AD accounts you must have created. This can be done through AD Users and Computers. Ensure that you turn on the Advanced View and you'll see the necessary options under the Exchange Advanced Tab of the AD accounts properties. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 04:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication Define some test users were migrated over successfully. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT4 Domain authnetication I have a customer who has an NT 4 domain and does not want to upgrade it to AD yet. He does want to use Exchange 2000. We created a seperate AD domain and installed E2K. Two way trust were created between domains and some test users were migrated over successfully. The problem is that whenever a user opens Outlook 2000, they are prompted for a username/password/domainname. Does anyone know how to correct this? please email if possible to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or post replies here. thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How Do I Create Account on Exchange WIth Visual BAsic
Hello, Ihad made an application which can make and account automatically on my windows nt but i wanna also make account automatically on my exchange server with the same application can any one help me out. if any one of you write or have the code for that then plz send me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best Regards. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store growing rapidly!!!!
Osama, Check out this article. Good luck! Troubleshooting a Rapidly Growing Information Store [Q170361] http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q170361 Flynn -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store growing rapidly Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my priv IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do and offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB (was 19 went down to 18). Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag and that in only 8h. When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not +2GB. Actually the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB wile my priv.ed is now 20.5GB! I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. I also noticed that the Mailboxes resources Listing shows the Exchange Admin account as the NT account on many mailboxes. When double clicking the mailbox it shows the correct account in the details. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. regards Osama S. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders and Address Book Views
Hi, I have public folders that I would like to include in the Address Book views. I use Custom Attribute 10 to sort the address book but apparently it has no effect on Public Folders or Distribution List. They get dropped only at the GAL root but not under the created Address book views. Is that by design? Can it be overcome? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Mailbox sizes won't change after a defrag. The size of the store itself is what changes. Missy - Original Message - From: Osama S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:48 AM Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
eTrust Content Inspection
Hi there, For those who have used eTrust Content Inspection product? Do you think it is as good as Mimesweper and Surfcontrol email filtering product ? I am still in the learning process to compare these 3 products, so far I have not found any distinct differences? Your comments are certainly helping me to make decision which to purchase, thanks. BY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Resources Questions
Have you looked in your Sent Items? Your calendar? Journal? Contacts? They add up fairly quickly. And every attachment is an item. I haven't a clue as to what's on your D: drive. Can you tell me? Missy - Original Message - From: John Navara [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:27 PM Subject: Mailbox Resources Questions How accurate is the Mailbox Resources list in the Private Information Store when using Exchange Administrator? We have been having problems with our D: drive filling up and it is showing what I believe to be inaccurate information regarding some of the mailboxes. For example, it shows my box as being 107,223k with 12,907 items. In looking closely at my Outlook program, there is no way that I have almost 13,000 items in my mail box. What can I do to update this and what effects will it have on the actual size of the D: drive in relation to drive space available? We currently have less that 200MB on a 4.3G drive. Thanks, John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows 2000 License
It may have changed in the last two years, so contact MS to be sure, but when I purchased it, it was licensed on machine blocks (0-5, 5-25 etc. for example) Trend should be able to clarify this for you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Windows 2000 License Importance: High Hi friends, I am testing trendMicro Product. I haven't installed yet the ScaMail but we wilI test it too. At the moment I have installed ScanOffice application on Windows 2000 Server( Member Server with one simple Server License). I want to know if I will need to purchase Client Server License for use TrendMicro or I can to use TrendMicro on Windows 2000 Member server with Simple Server License. Any help will be apreciate. Liliana :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
I actually use several Containers... 1 for Recipients 1 for DL's 1 for Custom Recipients 1 for Special Items PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Why does the X500 address need to be added? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
That is pretty damn funny! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
So old mail sitting in other mailboxes originally from or to the old mailbox will not ndr if there is a continued conversation. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Why does the X500 address need to be added? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for janitors. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I tried it January 1999. But I didn't inhale. William -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Did you have a sex change operation? Tom. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Oh, now his question makes sense. I didn't know about the accident. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Baa Ram Ewe Baa Ram Ewe -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4
I believe Sherpa Software has a tool which will do this. http://www.sherpasoftware.com/ Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Hi all. I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with? I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the attachments. Thanks in advance for your help, Denyse _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Sorry I'm still new to the group. Me not know when you being sarcastic The Duh is on me... PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked the Mailbox sizes now and compared them to the mailbox sizes before the defrag I found the difference to be 27MB only and not 2GB. Also weiredm, the total of my mailboxes is only 8.5GB while my priv.edb is now 20.5GB. I have mailbox limitations on most mailboxes and none are unusually high. The biggest two mailboxes are 200MB each. I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. On double clicking the mailbox I can see the correct NT account in that view. What is going on? Would appreciate any help. Osama Salah _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Containers
Joe Smith hires on and goes to work for Mike Bloggs in Engineering. So you create his mailbox in Engineering. A few years later he moves to Marketing to be a technical rep. How do you move his mailbox from the Engineering container to the Marketing containter? You don't. Not without deleting and recreating his account. - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
Well, sorta. The directories talk to each other, er... directly. - Original Message - From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site Exchange 5.5 servers communicate through the MTA when they're in the same site. Missy - Original Message - From: John Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site What allows them to talk to each other, i.e. what connector x.400 through RPC? Can you tell Exchange which server to put the mailboxes? Thnaks, -John Q Jr. I checked the logs and there was no receipt of mail anyhere between 12:00 - 4:00 PST from msn. You did however receive mail from a @uophx.edu connection at 15:21:27. This confirms that you were getting mail at this time.? - Original Message - From: Mark Harford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:05 AM Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication You really need to give us a load more info. Is it part of an existing Ex5.5 set up with an ADC in place? Did you use the ADMT or a third-party equivalent to migrate the users? Etc, etc. Mark Briefly though, you'll need to add the NT4 accounts into the mailbox permissions of the mailbox-enabled AD accounts you must have created. This can be done through AD Users and Computers. Ensure that you turn on the Advanced View and you'll see the necessary options under the Exchange Advanced Tab of the AD accounts properties. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 January 2002 04:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT4 Domain authnetication Define some test users were migrated over successfully. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT4 Domain authnetication I have a customer who has an NT 4 domain and does not want to upgrade it to AD yet. He does want to use Exchange 2000. We created a seperate AD domain and installed E2K. Two way trust were created between domains and some test users were migrated over successfully. The problem is that whenever a user opens Outlook 2000, they are prompted for a username/password/domainname. Does anyone know how to correct this? please email if possible to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or post replies here. thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Containers
Well, he said guys go in one container Does this mean there is something you want to tell us, Andy? What was the *real* reason behind the job switch ;) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Andy David | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/07/2002 02:57 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Containers | -| What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm missing that damned accent character), Darcy, and several other members of this list that I have met over the years. After that I place all other women in containers after a subjective review based on my own personal tastes. After all, it's all about me. This method only fails if someone has a sex change operation or has plastic surgery that goes horribly wrong. Tragic farm equipment accidents can affect the outcome also. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What nightmare do you create by using different containers? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Just use the recipients container. You will create a nightmare for your self if you do anything else. -Original Message- From: Sparrow, Teresa (GOT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Containers Wanting to gather information. In a large Exchange 5.5 environment organization would you place everyone in the recipients container or make different containers for organizational levels? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended
RE: Mailbox Resources Questions
The D: drive is the location where exchange is loaded on our server. John -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Resources Questions Have you looked in your Sent Items? Your calendar? Journal? Contacts? They add up fairly quickly. And every attachment is an item. I haven't a clue as to what's on your D: drive. Can you tell me? Missy - Original Message - From: John Navara [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:27 PM Subject: Mailbox Resources Questions How accurate is the Mailbox Resources list in the Private Information Store when using Exchange Administrator? We have been having problems with our D: drive filling up and it is showing what I believe to be inaccurate information regarding some of the mailboxes. For example, it shows my box as being 107,223k with 12,907 items. In looking closely at my Outlook program, there is no way that I have almost 13,000 items in my mail box. What can I do to update this and what effects will it have on the actual size of the D: drive in relation to drive space available? We currently have less that 200MB on a 4.3G drive. Thanks, John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
